So, taking this on board there is no difference biologically speaking with the plight of the Scottish Wildcat being bred out of existence by invading domestic cats and white Europeans being outbred by Muslims who have three times as many children, or by the mainstream media which puts out the message that mixed race families are superior or some sort of fashion statement.

Why is it therefore acceptable to say to 'racists' that race is simply a social construct, that it doesn't exist, that the 'melting pot' is a good thing, when there is clearly a desire and noble cause to save sub-species such as the Wildcat from extinction. Despite what this BBC article has said the Wildcat population will live on in the genes passed on to its young when interbreeding with domestic cats, so why this concern for these wild animals, and not the concern for the European man and woman which like the Wildcat is facing utter destruction at the hands of encroachment into its home environment.

But of course, I'm just a racist Wildcat supremacist...