the lioness is a guy IRL (AKA Cassiterides) #fundie

the lioness is a guy IRL (AKA Cassiterides) #fundie egyptsearch.com

(Seemed to fit both RSTDT and FSTDT, flipped a coin)

[cassiterides says evolution is a fairytale, that GOD created each of the "races" separately about 6000 years ago ]

I claimed Aryans (Indo-Europeans) are around 6,000-7,000 years old and they are the Adamites of the Bible. Aryan = ploughman and Genesis states Adam was a 'tiller' or plougher of the ground. The etymology of Adam is also 'ruddy, to show blood in the face' - only people with pale white skin show blood in the face.

Science estimates the Australian aborigines around 60,000 years old, East Asians 20,000-30,000 years, and the Bushmen up to 100,000.

I only ever claimed Aryans are 6,000 years old. The non-white races are far older pre-adamite creations.

But yes all races have seperate origins and evolution is a fairytale.

Only a crank would believe a negro morphed into a white man or a white man into a negro. Yet there are afrocentrics on the forum who think this happened. Time to take their medication.

25 comments

old comment by TimeToTurn

Aryan = ploughman and Genesis states Adam was a 'tiller' or plougher of the ground

The only thing we know for certain "Aryan" means is "noble". Any previous meanings of the word are only thereotical.

You would also think that the people of the Near East would be Aryan, since they were using agriculture far earlier than Indo-Europeans were. Not to mention the Garden of Eden was kinda located there, according to basically every non-Mormon account of that story.

Science estimates the Australian aborigines around 60,000 years old, East Asians 20,000-30,000 years, and the Bushmen up to 100,000.

Science also says that the human race in general is about 200,000 years old. Plenty of time to migrate to every part of the world.

But yes all races have seperate origins and evolution is a fairytale.

There's some science which might back you up on the first part (like pre-Homo sapiens humans contributing to the gene pool of Europeans and Asians), but absolutely zero which will back you up on the second.

I only ever claimed Aryans are 6,000 years old. The non-white races are far older pre-adamite creations.

There are some very, very unfortunate implications here. Do non-whites have souls? If they don't, then do mixed-race people have souls?

Only a crank would believe a negro morphed into a white man or a white man into a negro

Aside from the need to absorb vitamin D in climates without much vitamin D due to lower sunlight. Like, say, Europe and Asia.

@Swede

Indo-Europeans were probably the skin colour of Siberians (i.e. white), they mixed with the peoples of India whom they linguistically displaced to get the darker skin colours of the Indian peoples. Same thing in Persia, for that matter.

old comment by

Ruddy, to show blood in the face... Like Native Americans who you'd probably call "red niggers" amongst other epithets? What about Mexicans, Filipinos, and others whose complexions are *constantly* showing a reddish tinge from time in the sun and fields?

But what you take away from that is to look for whoever is easily seen blushing or flushed from overexertion which shows shame or poor health... okay then.

So white people are much younger than other races... but Adam being the first man is the first child of God. But perhaps the great white race are children of Samael and Lillith, said to have sired a "race" of men after Adam and Eve? It would make sense that the children of darkness would have skin intolerant to God's gift of the sun, setting a mark on them so that Creation would know the lies born of their pride and arrogance.

See, your psuedoscience and quasi-mystical hokum can very easily mean everything other than what you want it to.

the lioness is a guy IRL (AKA Cassiterides) #fundie egyptsearch.com

25 comments

Confused?