If God made the world and us he also gave us the power to understand science so if he made the rules of science he could easily make it look like there was no proof of anything he's done 'cause if there was he'd dissapear
I could also add noone can actually prove whether the earth revolves round the sun or the sun revolves round the earth either, which do you believe to be true ?
Do you actually think the hardcore scientific community would let through a paper from a creationist bulldog if it seriously fucked up some of their ideas even if it was absolutely water-tight with? I don't think so somehow.
If you talk in a non religious sense you don't have the right for anything. Awww you don't get a lawyer ? Tough shit, get over it. Awww you got murdered? Tough shit, only the strong survive. You have to get religious before you start mentioning rights.
If it doesn't fit in with current thinking it just has to be wrong. Look what almost happened to galileo!!
... the ark [Noah built] would have to carry the genetic data banks to allow for the creation of all these species.
... its ok most of the scientists you are obviously reading about just guess alot of their work anyway.
There are scientists currently challenging some of einsteins theories of relativity, talking about a variable speed of light and so on, will this mean he will fall into the same realm as [Kent] Hovind then?
If you;d read the rest of my post I said one theory for God not providing any solid proof is that to reveal himself to everyone would disprove other beliefs or maybe all beliefs so he disprove the existance of himself.
Would it even matter if I did quote you some examples as I am sure you would find some way to discredit them, people believe what they want to believe. Not necessarily what evidence points towards.
By saying you do not belive in God you are acknowledging its existance. If people believe in a God, then it exists for them and from their point of view it exists for other people aswell.