(In response to an article in Nature pointing out the jury-rigged nature of human anatomy.)
Many of these "errors" can now be pinpointed to genetic mutations: at a recent count, around 75,000 of them are disease-linked. Given that the central tennent of creationism is that everything God made was 'good' prior to the fall, and only subsequent to this, did disease, death etc come into being, this seems rather ironically to point towards God as our creator.
[About the fossil "Ida"]
This is obviously a complete fossil. What Evolution has to show us is fossils of transtional forms with incomplete organs. Half fish half reptile, half reptile half bird. Montrous creatures. And the transitional forms must outnumber the stable species. we must have trillions of hem if evolution is a fact. But we dont have any. We have 100 million fossils today belonging to complete stable species. we dont have even single transitional form. That scientific fact refutes all the claims of Darwinism. Scientific fact disproves the theory of evolution. Species appear abruptly, complete and perfectly formed. This fact poves us an exalted Creation by Allah.
How much longer will Darwinism be able to survive? If the Darwinian dogmas require politicians to be propagated in classrooms, it tells us Darwin is dead and so are his hypotheses. Darwinians must be in dispair now their ideas are completely overturned by the new biology. That Darwin's ideas are not in agreement with observations has been known since the release of "The origin of Species" and is currently being demonstrated on the molecular level. More and more scientists are tacitly turning away from Darwin's inventions. Scientists have wasted 150 years by following this 19th century naturalist.
[Comment left on an article in Nature, the UK's premier science journal...]
Let's look at simple facts: is it really scientific to teach a theory that relies on Random Big Bangs, Chance chemical soup & Trillions of genetic mistakes turning hydrogen into you & i?! 'In the beginning God created the heavens & the earth': a 'round earth', 'hanging on nothing', in 'stretched out' space, where the 'sun circuits the heavens', & everything only reproduces 'After its Kind' - now that's observable science, written down under inspiration some 700 to 2000 yrs ago. What you should be doing is teaching how to think, not what to think.
Let's look at simple facts: is it really scientific to teach a theory that relies on Random Big Bangs, Chance chemical soup & Trillions of genetic mistakes turning hydrogen into you & i?! 'In the beginning God created the heavens & the earth': a 'round earth', 'hanging on nothing', in 'stretched out' space, where the 'sun circuits the heavens', & everything only reproduces 'After its Kind' - now that's observable science, written down under inspiration some 700 to 2000 yrs ago. What you should be doing is teaching how to think, not what to think.