top

Joel Davis #racist #psycho angrywhitemen.org

Elijah Schaffer hosted a debate on diversity between Australian Neo-Nazi Joel Davis and Drew Pavlou[…]
One of the first questions posed by[…]Schaffer was for Davis and Pavlou to define diversity[…]
“Our country was founded by white nationalists,” Davis asserted

“Every single founding father and the first 16 prime ministers of Australia[…]they were all white nationalists[…]They explicitly founded this place as a white nationalist state with something called the ‘White Australia policy’[…]”

Davis explained that “being against diversity” was about “preserving the white man’s land” and “maintain[ing] white values”[…]“What diversity really means is white genocide on a long enough timeline”[…]
Davis went on to say that his ancestors “for thousands of years” fought wars, “engaged in settler-colonialism”[…]“I would be pissing in their face if I was to just allow it to be thrown away”[…]
He added that even if he wanted to leave Australia due to the country’s racial diversity he would have “nowhere to go”[…]Claimed that everywhere white people were “previously the dominant culture” has been “systematically attacked”[…]
“I wanna have a country in which people like me are in charge,” Davis declared. “Where my culture is maintained. Where my way of life is maintained. And I want that to be passed down to my children. And I don’t care if I have to fight for it and some people have to get hurt[…]Because that’s the essence of human existence”

“You use euphemisms because you’re talking about killing millions of people,” Pavlou countered

“I don’t think we would — in Australia[…]I think me becoming dictator and going ‘You best be fuckin’ off,’ I think they would mostly leave”[…]
“You would have to kill so many people. Your ideology is one of nihilism and bloodshed,” Pavlou replied

“Fine,” said Davis, who compared the violent ethnic cleansing of an entire country to Ukrainians defending themselves from Russian invasion and Palestinians resisting Israeli occupation

Laura Loomer #racist #wingnut angrywhitemen.org

Laura Loomer interviewed white nationalist Peter Brimelow whose organization, VDARE, is currently being investigated by New York Attorney General Letitia James[…]
“Why do you think you came under fire from Letitia James?” Loomer asked Brimelow. “Do you think it’s because you are talking about white replacement theory and you’re exposing the invasion and your publication is one of the only honest publications about what’s truly happening with this invasion?”[…]
Loomer went on to say that Letitia James, who also filed a civil suit against former president Donald Trump and his Trump Organization, “obviously hates white people”

And she attacked James, as well as other Black public figures, in crudely racist terms. Loomer declared that “there’s a commonality between Letitia James, Kamala Harris, and Fanni Willis,” which is that they’re “ghetto Black women” and “trap queens” who attended Howard University, a prestigious HBCU. “I don’t think it’s a coincidence, right, that these DAs, Vice President, and the Attorney General, they have no sense of ethics,” she said

Peter Brimelow appeared to agree, and complained that “it’s not possible to run a First World justice system with Third World people”

“I mean, the culture of the Third World is so different than the First World,” he told Loomer. “It’s not just Blacks, although I think you’re right, and we’ve written about this a lot on VDARE.com, there’s a lot of angry, Black women out there in positions of authority. And there’s a real question as to whether they can be trusted, and whether they can be relied upon to behave fairly”

Brimelow also attacked Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over former president Trump’s hush money trial, for having been born in Colombia. “What kind of cultural baggage does he bring?” he asked. “Why should we expect — is Colombia such a great haven of law and order and fair dealing, that we can expect someone from Colombia to make a good judge in New York state?”

Heather Mac Donald and Megyn Kelly #racist #wingnut #conspiracy angrywhitemen.org

On The Megyn Kelly Show, Heather Mac Donald endorsed the[…]“Great Replacement” conspiracy theory. Mac Donald, a fellow at the right-wing Manhattan Institute, declared that the “Great Replacement theory is real”[…]
While discussing campus protests against colleges doing business with Israel, Mac Donald said that conservatives should “shut down as much of the universities as we can” and “create as many alternatives as we can.” She added that they also must “speak up for Western civilization” and its values: “equality, tolerance, human rights, limited government”

“These are all exclusively Western ideas,” she said. “They came out of no place outside of the West. They didn’t come out of Africa. They didn’t come out of China. They didn’t come out of Arabia. They didn’t come out of India. And now the Left uses the bounty of beautiful Enlightenment ideas to try and tear down the Enlightenment”[…]
Mac Donald pivoted to giving a full-throated endorsement of the[…]“Great Replacement” conspiracy theory[…]
“The Great Replacement theory is real,” she declared. “We have decided to destroy our birthrate and to flood our country with cultures that en masse — en masse — are not compatible. We cannot assimilate the number of people who are coming, and we’ve decided we don’t even want to try”

And she said the “most galling thing” was that “the Left” claims that the U.S. and Europe are “fundamentally hostile to people of color” while at the same time claiming that Western nations are “oppressive” for not allowing in “millions of people” from “Third World places of color”[…]
“You can’t say that the West is endemically lethal to people of color, and at the same time say we want as many people of color to come in illegally into Western countries as possible because that’s where their lives will be improved[…]You get one or the other”

Kelly wholeheartedly agreed with Mac Donald, and mockingly said “That’s right. Or as they now put it, it’s not safe for brown and Black bodies”

Matt Walsh #racist #dunning-kruger #pratt angrywhitemen.org

On the Apr. 17, 2024 episode of The Matt Walsh Show,[…]Matt Walsh claimed that Aboriginal Australians “happen to have, on average, the second lowest IQ of any demographic group on the planet”[…]Walsh cited an anonymous X account[…]

What do these activists mean when they say they wanna decolonize math, given that the entire idea of decolonizing math is completely incoherent? The Arabs were colonizers too. And why are Australians of all people so interested in promoting this idea? Well one possibility is that, by some estimates as the Twitter account i/o points out, Aboriginal Australians happen to have, on average, the second lowest IQ out of any demographic group on the planet
Now that’s the sort of thing that’s supposed to be unciteable, but it’s impossible to talk about certain groups struggling academically without bringing up the intellectual elephant in the room. I mean there might be a reason why there aren’t many Aboriginals working at NASA[…]It’s an important point because it means that decolonization, practically speaking, entails dumbing down these subjects or destroying them altogether
And mainly we see, with this decolonization agenda, the embarrassment that liberal Westerners feel about the fact that their ancestors were far more advanced[…]The liberal Westerner’s constantly looking for ways to even out the score. And we’re seeing that more and more in this country as well[…]
But as we just established, some cultures and civilizations did indeed advance science and mathematics more than others. I mean there were some cultures and civilizations that didn’t advance it at all because they didn’t even have the concepts. And there were others that did quite a bit to advance it. And some of those were colonizers[…]
I mean maybe you could argue that this belongs in some elective history course somewhere, but it has no place affecting courses on the fundamentals of mathematics, which is exactly what’s happening in this country

Charlie Kirk and Jeremy Carl #racist #conspiracy angrywhitemen.org

On the Apr. 16, 2024 episode of his Rumble show,[…]Charlie Kirk interviewed Jeremy Carl — a Senior Fellow at the[…]Claremont Institute who authored a book bemoaning “anti-white racism”

Charlie Kirk: So let’s get back into the anti-white racism. How do we then best fight back and withstand the criticism where they’re gonna say this is just a whitelash, or this is just you being a white nationalist?
Jeremy Carl: Right. Well I mean the simple answer to the white nationalist question is I’m just — I’m not[…]I mean there should be a backlash against the fact that there being racists, because that’s good[…]You shouldn’t be able to be racist without accountability. So I don’t have any problem with that
But I think there’s lots of different tactics. Whether it’s lawfare[…]we need to really re-look at how we’ve enforced civil rights laws[…]I’m not saying that because I think we need to relitigate the wisdom of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It was put in at a particular time to solve —
CK: Oh I’ll criticize it
JC: Yeah, yeah. But it’s — but I mean —
CK: That’s Caldwell’s thing
JC:[…]Chris Caldwell is a colleague of mine[…]It’s fine to do that. But I think just as a political strategy, I think if people wanna say ‘Hey, there were absolutely real problems that it was addressing,’ whether you think it did it in the perfect way or not. But we’re as far from that time right now as they were from the Wright brothers. So there’s a lot of things that’ve changed in American society. We’re not worried about people not being served at lunch counters anymore
CK: Yeah, and the Civil Rights Act, though let’s be clear, created a beast. And that beast has now turned into an anti-white weapon
JC: Yeah. And that’s the reality. And so we just need to fundamentally re-look at a lot of our civil rights legal regime. And without that, even though I don’t think it’s sort of the magic bullet, but I think without that there’s limits to the amount of progress we’re gonna make