Show post
Eurasian Tiger (Red Pill Comics) #sexist #racist incels.wiki

Warning: Source NSFW!)
Panel 1: Private Kuk*, a soldier, hugs his girlfriend/wife (henceforth “Love Interest”). In the background, a church.
Kuk: “I’m sorry baby, but I need to defend our freedoms.”

Panel 2: Kuk waves Love Interest goodbye.
Kuk: “Remember the 14 words! 88 White Pride”
Love Interest: “I’ll wait for you, baby!”

Panel 3: Battle scene. Kuk is standing in the open, firing his rifle, as a grenade comes flying towards him. Behind a fortification, another soldier cries out in shock.
Kuk: “Die you fuckin’ ragheads! You’ll never take our freedom! The beauty of the Aryan wo-”
Soldier: “Private Kuk, look out!”

Panel 4: The grenade explodes directly in front of Kuk.
Kuk: “Fuckin’ Ay-rab Sand N***ers**! I’ll be back to kill all you subhumans!”

Panel 5: Kuk, now walking with a crutch, is opening a door.
Kuk: “Babe, I’m home!”

Panel 6: Kuk is slack-jawed as he sees Love Interest having sex with a white jock, whose penis is thicker than her arms.
Sound effects: *squeak* *squeak*

Panel 7: Kuk, now with a beard and wearing what may be supposed to be a turban, is moving towards a Middle Eastern town.


* Seriously, that’s his name.
** Censorship mine. There’s no way I’m going to write that word!

Show post
Nick Conrad #racist #psycho #wtf bbc.com

A French rapper who was on trial over an online music video entitled Hang White People has been found guilty of incitement to violence and given a suspended €5,000 (£4,280) fine.

Nick Conrad, who is self-produced, was virtually unknown to the French public before he released the video last year calling for white babies to be killed.

The video showing the rapper acting out the kidnap, torture and hanging of a white man sparked outrage.

Conrad has said he will appeal.

The rapper, who denies any racism towards white people, had argued the song was a comment on racism, and that the video was a fictional depiction of racism, designed to shock by inverting roles, and therefore not to be taken at face value.

"The court had a reading of freedom of expression that does not satisfy us," his lawyer said after the hearing.

The court said in its judgement that if "the permissible limits of freedom of expression are assessed with greater flexibility" when it comes to rap, "the freedom of artistic creation is, however, not absolute", the AFP news agency reports.

The nine-minute video, first published on YouTube in September, was quickly suspended for violating the company's terms of service.

It depicts a white man being shot and tortured by the rapper and an accomplice. He is forced to bite the pavement and is kicked in the head before being hanged.

One section of the lyrics reads: "I go to the nurseries, I kill the white babies. Catch them quick and hang their parents!"

Anti-racism groups had called the clip an incitement to violence and racial hatred.

The charge against Conrad could have resulted in up to five years in prison and €45,000 in fines, but prosecutors requested a suspended fine of €5,000, saying he had "already to a certain extent paid the consequences" after he lost his job as a hotel receptionist.

He was ordered to pay €1,000 in damages to each of the two anti-racism associations which brought the case.

Show post
Karina Baha #wtf #ableism psychologytoday.com

Because you are fat

You're the idiot. Did you ever heard about the master and slave morality? Of course you are the slave and if you can'to loose weight, well. Stop making children like you. You know there are shinny happy people in this world and we don't t want to see these slaves and their children. If you can't loose weight, than stop being. If stop eating doesn't to help you. Or pay taxes. But don't make people accept cause we don't! And we don't t have Tim we to accept your ilness. It's just time to multiply yourself!

Show post
Incel Wiki #sexist incels.wiki

Feminine imperative

The feminine imperative is for a foid to pursue alpha fucks and beta bucks by keeping various men around to serve her various needs, while being loyal to none of them. The incel doesn't figure into this equation at all as a sexual partner; in her world, he is either invisible or exists solely for the resources he can provide without getting anything in return.

Foids justify behaving in this way, and treating men as means to an end, using the "romantic" argument that they should be free to makes sexual decisions based solely on tingles. When a foid does this, this is known as "following her pussy". Men, of course, are expected to be responsible and have integrity rather than being free to follow their penises, except in the case of Chad, the attractive man whom she hopes to arouse and provoke to the point that he uses his masculine strength to sexually dominate her.

Under feminism, foids expect to have both the freedom to follow their pussies and to have the assistance of betas and incels in dealing with the fallout from making these decisions. For example, if she gets impregnated and dumped by Chad, then other men must open the wallets to support the child. This can take the form of a betabuxxes' wifing her up, or it can take the form of men orbiting her on social media and offering her free financial assistance in (often vain) hopes of eventually getting sexual favors for being a nice guy. It can also include men's being forced to pay taxes to fund her welfare checks, or to give her equal opportunity to be employed at a company they own, even if she is less productive, and more distracting to her co-workers, than a man would be.

One might say that the feminine imperative is for a foid to be treated as a child in terms of being let off the hook and protected from the consequences of her decisions, yet treated like an adult in terms of being allowed to make potentially disastrous choices without supervision.[1]

References

[1] The Feminine Imperative, Jim's Blog

Show post
Eurasian Tiger (Red Pill Comics) #sexist i.imgur.com

(Transscript because NSFW)
Panel 1
Woman to Man 1:"I'm sorry, we should take it slower. Friends?"

Panel 2
Woman to Man 2: "You're great, but as a Catholic I can't date a [sic] atheist. And no sex before marriage."

Panel 3
Woman to Man 3: "I'd prefer a guy with better career prospects. You'll find someone."

Panel 4
Woman to Man 4: "You're Wonderful, but I'm a vegan and you eat meat."

Panel 5
Man 5, who has a greaser hairstyle, an oversized angular jaw, an extremely thick neck and several tatoos, including one reading "6'4" no e-stax" [?], wears a shirt with an inverted pentagram and the sentence "I love Satan" on it, and holds a burger in one hand and a McDonalds paycheck in the other: "Yo, wut time iz it?"
Woman: "3:07 - Ohmygawd"

Panel 6
It is 3:27. Man 5, who is revealed to have a swastika tatoo on his chest, ejaculates on Woman.


(Take a guess which character is drawn with the greatest attention to detail...)

Show post
The_Truth_Hurts #fundie arstechnica.com

This would be an interesting point if Language stayed still and definitions did not change. The term Person, in its modern usage, has no religious meaning at all.


"Modern usage"???
Seriously? You consider 50 years ago ancient history or something?
The term "person" is a religious term. The fact that atheists are trying to culturally appropriate the word is suddenly ok, simply because you need to steal the term in order to make an absolutely false point, right?

"Person" has a theological meaning, always has, always will.
The UN Declaration on Human Rights uses the term in its theological context. The three Persons of the Trinity are distinguished only by the relationships (begetting, begotten, spiration, spirated). Made in the image and likeness of God, human persons are likewise distinguished by their relationships.

The whole UN document drips with Catholic theology explaining how this applies in the political realm. Not a surprise, since Jacques Mauritain, one of the principle advisors, was a devout Catholic. The modern political international world is built around the UN. So, yeah, "person" remains an intensely religious term, even if the people who throw it around are too ignorant of religion to realize what they are attempting to culturally appropriate.

Show post
camletoejoe #conspiracy #wingnut np.reddit.com

They are more likely to fight asymmetrically. And you are foolish to underestimate your opponent. Considering the complete obliteration of the white male in the USA by the opioid epidemic and HOW the leftists seek to continue the killings and the profits, its almost, like, maybe it already began. Take a look at the homeless. All men. Real USA loving God loving men. Vote Republican. All over the place. And they are getting killed on the streets left and right every single day. Maybe that is just a coincidence, but, it almost seems like warfare..
They are more likely to fight asymmetrically. And you are foolish to underestimate your opponent. Considering the complete obliteration of the white male in the USA by the opioid epidemic and HOW the leftists seek to continue the killings and the profits, its almost, like, maybe it already began. Take a look at the homeless. All men. Real USA loving God loving men. Vote Republican. All over the place. And they are getting killed on the streets left and right every single day. Maybe that is just a coincidence, but, it almost seems like warfare..

Show post
Stefan Molyneux #conspiracy #racist twitter.com

The Irish government:

1. We really need to reduce our environmental impact

2. We’re going to import a million people from the third world, so we’re going to need over half a million new houses

“Environmentalism” is a codeword for population replacement.

Show post
Incel Wiki #sexist #pratt #wtf incels.wiki

Dating is an RPG videogame where you need to pass a minimum looks threshold to pass levels. If the player does not meet the minimum looks treshold, he can still pass levels by compensating via money and status. In recent times, the games' difficulty levels have been increased, primarily in the West.
image
Part 1: At a bar, a man and a woman are smiling at each other. The woman’s eyes are photoshopped to glow red and emit a cone of light scanning the man’s face.
Part 2: A sinister red science-fiction computer display, showing the man’s head frontal and in profile. In the buttom-right corner, a purple female symbol with a fist inside the circle.

PERSONALITY.EXE

ARYAN SKULL SHAPE DETECTED
»INITIATE BREEDING PROTOCOL»

POS. CANTHAL DETECTED

SCANNING ONLINE COMMENT HISTORY FOR MISOGYNY…
HTTPS://WWW.REDDIT.COM/R/BRAINCELS…
|SCANNING INTENSIFIES|
»SCAN COMPLETE»
SCANNING BANK ACCOUNT FOR RESSOURCE EXTRACTION…
»RESOURCES DETECTED»

TARGET ACQUIRED: CHAD

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
PREGNANCY
EXTRACT SEMEN A.S.A.P.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
RESOURCE EXTRACTION
KILL SEQUENCE: DIVORCE.EXE

Show post
punished_thn #racist #fundie #conspiracy #psycho reddit.com

Ever since blessed saint Adolf lost the war, the church has become a vassal of Israel. The Vatican was an ally of Hitler during the war, Jews know this. That’s why after Hitler died and the protection he offered his ally from Communists, pedophiles, and Jews was dissolved, the synagogue of Satan sent thousands of “priests” to infiltrate and destroy the church from within. Google “Bella Dodd.”

Speaking as a former high ranking official of the American Communist Party, Mrs. Dodd said: "In the 1930s we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within." The idea was for these men to be ordained and progress to positions of influence and authority as Monsignors and Bishops. A dozen years before Vatican II she stated that: "Right now they are in the highest places in the Church" — where they were working to bring about change in order to weaken the Church's effectiveness against Communism. She also said that these changes would be so drastic that "you will not recognize the Catholic Church.”

That’s why 75% of church pedophile cases occurred from 1950-1980. That’s why Vatican II happened. That’s why mainstream Christian Zionism happened.

Blessed Saint Adolf was a martyr for Europa, slain by the same Jews who murdered Christ and in a similar way too: by tricking/forcing the gentiles into doing it.

Jesus was a Nazarene from Galilee, descended from ancient Israelites who shared a common ancestor with the Spartans according to the Bible. He was not a modern Jew.

Show post
majtommm (“Oberführer SchutzFren”) #racist #wingnut reddit.com

(“Fren” is a deliberately goofy dog whistle for “fellow Nazi”)

Cautious awareness is the correct way to approach the NonFren, but you need not fear. You are home amongst your own kind.

If you should see a NonFren in the wild here you need to alert the mods or your closet ShutzFren so they can be bopped on site.

Show post
nowig #sexist #psycho reddit.com

What our cuck society does not understand, is that women only want to consume, nothing more. They continually establish consumption baseline and advance from it, unless there is an external limitation

It's an evolutionary adaptation. Men form cooperative groups and hunt, risk lives for each other. Women just sit home and nag, "what did you bring, a rabbit, why not a deer, the guys at the other cave brought a deer." If it's a deer it would be "why not a mammoth?" That's why there always was a patriarchy. To shut them up, because they would not regulate themselves. If there was an ancient society that mutated into the prohibition of "mansplaining", it did not survive, it died out very fast. There is no record of such society, that's how fast it died.

The women evolved as part of the system where they are put in place by external force. I am not saying they are wrong or immoral, they are just that part of the system. Western men are now cucked and will be pushed further and further, until Ahmed assumes the role of now missing forceful restraint. The women who file lawsuits because they were told they look nice, will be struck in the face, per Koran, if they argue. And they will like it. It will feel very safe. I am not sure what's the way out of this predicament. It's all very sad

Show post
James “Chateau Heartiste” Weilman #sexist #psycho web.archive.org

Catfish Game

An emailer asks me for the details about how I run Catfish Game.

Hi,

I want the details about the fake profile pics and pulling girls. You basically catfish them?

Thanks

Basically, yes. Sometimes. Or the fake pic is so obviously fake that it’s not really a catfish, but an opportunity to wildly flirt with the girl and issue increasingly brazen challenges to her to overcome her “weird suspicions”. It’s what I call Gaslight Game, and the objective is to corrupt the girl’s comfortable grip on reality and make her think she’s going a little bit crazy believin’ her lyin’ eyes and her gatekeepin’ thighs. It’s akin to the advice I have given to men who get caught cheating: deny deny deny, until your woman starts to question her sanity.

It’s hard to give too many revealing details, what with the heat around every corner, but a couple of commenters provided personal techniques that are similar to what I do. From Chris,

I did exactly this all throughout 2012-2015 when I was on POF.

I used to hate being seen by locals on that sewer of a site, and so always used fake pics (that were, admittedly, a reasonably close resemblance to how I actually looked). I used to hunt for someone like me on Google Images.

The thing is, 50% of chicks never remarked on anything untoward when they met me, and when the other 50% mentioned me not looking like my photos I shrugged my shoulders and said “photos can be funny like that”. I actually had a girl I had been seeing on the regular (for around 4 months) finally discover one afternoon I had used fake pics; she was really upset that she had been duped, but it didn’t stop me from continuing to plough her.

One of the other reasons I used fake pics was that I could run no-holds-barred asshole game on these girls with the confidence of anonymity.

Those were my best years in game.

100% cosign. I use two methods. The one Chris describes here (similar looking photo and nonchalant dismissal of the woman’s suspicions) and a supplementary method where I choose a fake photo looking nothing like me and then challenge the girl to see past the pic and ask herself what kind of sexy asshole would think he could get away with this *wink*. Or, like I mentioned above, I’ll turn on the gaslight and make her think she’s nuts for even questioning my moral rectitude. The overall effect is a positive one: “who does this guy think he is?”

From HEM, a reminder that if you’re gonna try Catfish Game, you had better have command of your frame,

I like to do this when I get bored. I actually prefer not even using a pic at all. But, sometimes I’ll use a scenic pic of some exotic place. Put something interesting in the profile bio (eg something that illustrates you’re intelligent and witty, as well as explicitly state that you’re alpha; the alpha can also be referenced in the screen name) and prob about 30% will respond. Of those, half will immediately ask for a pic. I usually trash them. The other half are receptive to what you have to say. Be straight-forward, brash and cocky. Never compliment their looks. Never apologize for something jerky that you say. You’ll be amazed at the results.
These are generally useful rules for online and offline dating. Truth is, there is plenty of overlap between the techniques advised for each realm of pickup.

No Pic Game is a cousin of Fake Pic Game, and the tactical payload is the same: zero fucks given sexiness combined with an enticing challenge to a woman to rise above her lameness. Plus, follow the general rule that a big component of any online pickup is radical pre-screening. The numbers are there, so there’s no good reason not to screen.

Final note. I can drop one vagnette from my worldstar. If I meet an online prospect for a first date who has not seen my real pic, she naturally will be stunned once our faces are inches apart. I immediately move to reduce her anxiety: “Yeah, I know, you’re pleasantly surprised. Even better in real life than in photos.” This gets a laugh. If it doesn’t, I follow up, “If you keep acting weird, I’m gonna think you’re a serial killer. Some guys are into that. Not me.” See what I did there? What would normally be a defensive position is upturned and the onus to act like a normal person is placed on her.

If she bites on all this, she will get around to asking me why I chose a fake pic. I measure her buying temp and use that to decide wether to continue whimsically gaslighting her or to get real and confess that the fake pic is there to a) evade the feds or b) screen for really shallow women. Now she’s feeling a need to prove she’s not shallow. Off to the races!

Show post
Take-The-Honk-Pill #racist #wingnut reddit.com

Frens let me tell you a little story (Lights smoke takes a big drag) back before the nonfrens came and destroyed our home. Life was good then a family could get by on a single frens income people were having babies and life was good. Then in 1965 it all changed the (((Nonfrens))) made sure of that

Show post
David J. Stewart #fundie #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

The bottom line is that the righteous and the ungodly cannot co-exist! Proverbs 29:27, “An unjust man is an abomination to the just: and he that is upright in the way is abomination to the wicked.” There is no common ground! The problem is that public schools legally demand for all children attend, unless parents can afford private school (which most cannot). You've got ungodly reprobates removing the Holy Bible and replacing it with the blatant lies of Evolution, inflicting these evils upon impressionable children, which horribly violates, offends and assaults Christian children and their parents! Only a Satanic-controlled Masonic federal U.S. government could get away with such a heinous crime! Freemasons should all be tried in a legitimate court (one not controlled by them), convicted and immediately hung until dead! That is how traitors were dealt with during The American Civil War. Freemasons are traitors to God, country and man!!! Hell will be filled with upper-level Freemasons, whose entire shameful organization wreaks of occult Luciferianism! Psalms 97:10a, “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil...” I hate Freemasonry, because it is evil!!!

The most prominent symbol of the Masonic control over America is the Washington Monument (which stands tall as a 666 foot erect male phallus; and 666 inches wide). Look on the reverse of any U.S. one-dollar bill, which is covered in Masonic occult symbols. What does that mean? It sadly means that Satan is the god of this wicked world, and Luciferians rule over America!!! That is why the land's highest courts today are legalizing all manner of filth, perversion, murder, adultery, greed, dishonesty, injustice and debauchery! I rejoice in knowing that their shallow victory will be very short lived. Job 20:5, “That the triumphing of the wicked is short, and the joy of the hypocrite but for a moment?” Ecclesiastes 5:8, “If thou seest the oppression of the poor, and violent perverting of judgment and justice in a province, marvel not at the matter: for he that is higher than the highest regardeth; and there be higher than they.” Born-again Christians alone are already on the winning side in Christ Jesus, more than conquerors through faith in God!!!

Show post
Incel Party #quack incelparty.win

Incel Party

is a new political party

The Incel Party is a non-violent political party devoted to helping all people on the inceldom spectrum find a partner. Incel is short for, and means, "involuntary celibacy", a life condition.

Policies

Key policies of the Incel Party include:

* Military seizure of boomer real-estate to give to millenials for free

* Pay femcels and incels to date each other

* A monthly, inflation-adjusted, government allowance of $500 for all the poor

* Legalize suicide and abolish psychiatry

Combatting Incelphobia

At the Incel Party, we will call out incelphobia, and bring about a new societal appreciation for all that men are weak, non-violently.

Show post
Caamib #fundie #sexist drakhianlibrary.wordpress.com

The main problem with porn isn’t degradation of women or extreme acts but that ejaculating via masturbation denies you the much greater pleasure of ejaculating in a vagina. Masturbation should be frowned upon by male sexualists for that reason.

Show post
Mainländer #sexist #vogon incels.wiki

(Line breaks added by submitter; link includes a video of him performing the “song”)

Going outside sucks so much
I get to see
So many cute white young girls whom
I won't ever even kiss
Going outside sucks so much I saw a boy
Playing Pokémon with his dad
Something I have never enjoyed
Going outside sucks
I wish that I could be
Till the day I die
A full blown NEET hiki
Why aren't foids forced to pay incels
To be NEETs just like men do with the kids
Foids have outside of the wedlock
With Chads and thugs, scoundrels and bandits
I wish I was Jeremy Meeks
And got paid well only to exist
Even after his violent crimes
Looks are indeed everything in life
I go outside and see the
People working on
The streets under the hot sun all are
Men foids never fawn upon
I go outside and I see the Normies with gfs
All of them are fat, tattooed roasties
Either that or ancient hags
Going outside sucks
I wish that I could be
Till the day I die
A full blown NEET hiki
Why aren't foids forced to pay incels
To be NEETs just like men do with the kids
Foids have outside of the wedlock
With Chads and thugs, scoundrels and bandits
I wish I was Jeremy Meeks
And got paid well only to exist
Even after his violent crimes
Looks are indeed everything in life

Show post
14words_of_truth #conspiracy #racist #ufo stormfront.org

Buzz Aldrin says he was evacuated from the South Pole last week because he became short of breath and began showing signs of altitude sickness.

The 86-year-old adventurer, who was the second man to walk on the moon, released details on Sunday of his dramatic medical evacuation from Antarctica. He is continuing to recuperate in a hospital in Christchurch, New Zealand.

Aldrin said in a statement on Sunday he still has some congestion in his lungs and so has been advised to rest in New Zealand until it clears up and to avoid the long flight back to the US for now.

Buzz Aldrin evacuated from Antarctica after showing signs of altitude sickness

The key evidence in what happened in Antarctica was Buzz Aldrin being rushed to New Zealand for treatment of "altitude sickness".

We know he wasn't climbing a mountain, and he wasn't by himself, but no one else got altitude sickness.

The original story was that world leaders (including Trump) other powerful politicians, top religious leaders, and astronaut Buzz Aldrin were all brought to a location below the ice in a large ice cavern to see ruins of a city there built by aliens, thousands of years ago.

But is that true, and how did Buzz Aldrin get a case of altitude sickness visiting alien ruins?

There are elements in the story that are verified by the old history, so yes, that is true.

A whistleblower stated that besides being shown the ruins and alien artifacts, the VIP's were also put on a craft (of the secret space program) and flown to the moon.

And that is where "altitude sickness" comes in!

The Secret Space Program has 3 large bases on the Moon, and the VIP's would have been brought to one of them and possibly shown additional alien artifacts there.

The Moon has an atmosphere which at ground level is about equivalent to Earth's atmosphere at 20,000 feet.

I expect that the old astronaut took his space suit helmet off and breathed the Moon's atmosphere, just because he wanted to do that, this time around. Doing so gave him altitude sickness. It was dangerous but he did not die, and it is just the sort of thing that he would have done.

If you look into the UFO story at all, you will begin hearing a "Peace & Love" message from everyone in the UFO investigation field.

Peace & Love

What has that got to do with White Survival?

There are alien species that have always been at war. From the first time that one of their kind encountered one of the other kind, they have been at war. That has gone on for millions of years!

The Nordic aliens have had huge and terrible wars against their own kind (just like European wars). They have fought wars with the intention of genocide against an ideology (such as communism) and claim to have annihilated the population of an entire planet in such a war.

Peace & Love?

What we need is better, more powerful, advanced weapons!

Peace & Love is what you have when all of your enemies are too afraid of you to attack!

Better living through a massive display of power.

Show post
Brian Niemeier #fundie brianniemeier.com

As Vox Day has noted, the United States is no longer a nation. Since the first Civil War it has been a multi-ethnic empire increasingly obsessed with micromanaging at home and meddling abroad. If that scenario sounds familiar, it should.

Despite its inherent flaws, this arrangement remained relatively stable until early in the last century, when the coastal elite who'd come to dominate American politics, media, and academia abandoned the mainline Protestantism that was their nominal faith and fully embraced the heretical death cult of globalist, socialist utopianism.

America's conquest by Massachusetts trundled along rather smoothly until the ruling class turned openly apostate. Now the majority of Americans who identify as Christians labor under the yoke of a managerial class who hate them--and who waste no opening to mock and deride their subjects.

Consider the scale of this apostasy. Then look at the murder rates--especially the glut of infanticide--in the original post. Better peoples have faced more severe divine chastisements for far less.

The enemy, as always, is Satan and sin. Pause from the incessant chatter of Weimerica, and take a long moment for introspection. If you don't like what you see inside yourself; repent, resolve to do better, and beg the Christ to mitigate His just judgment against us.

Divine punishments are also divine gifts. Pray the lesson takes quickly and sticks this time.

Show post
Stéphane Poussier #moonbat bbc.com

A former French left-wing parliamentary candidate has been arrested over his tweets about a policeman killed during a jihadist siege in southern France last week.

Stéphane Poussier appeared to celebrate the death of Lt-Col Arnaud Beltrame, saying it was great.

He added that the death in the town of Trèbes meant one less voter for President Emmanuel Macron.

Show post
Nabih al-Wahsh #racist #sexist #psycho bbc.com

An Egyptian lawyer has been sentenced to three years in prison for saying that women who wear ripped jeans should be raped in punishment.

Nabih al-Wahsh, a prominent conservative, was also fined 20,000 Egyptian pounds (£839; $1,130).

The lawyer made the remarks on a TV panel show in October, during a debate on a draft law on prostitution.

"Are you happy when you see a girl walking down the street with half of her behind showing?" he said.

He added: "I say that when a girl walks about like that, it is a patriotic duty to sexually harass her and a national duty to rape her."

Mr Wahsh said that women who wore revealing clothing were "inviting men to harass them", and said "protecting morals is more important than protecting borders".

The prosecutor brought charges against Mr Wahsh after a public outcry.

The National Council for Women's Rights condemned the remarks, saying they were a "flagrant call" for rape, in violation of "everything in the Egyptian constitution".

The council has now filed a complaint about the statement to the Supreme Council for Media Regulation about the broadcast which aired on 19 October.

Mr Wahsh has previously called the Holocaust "imaginary" and declared himself a proud anti-Semite.

"If I see any Israeli, I will kill him," he said during a separate TV panel show.

In October last year, Mr Wahsh was involved in a TV studio brawl with a cleric, after the cleric suggested women should not necessarily have to wear a headscarf.

Show post
Kathy Dettwyler #fundie bbc.com

A Delaware college has severed ties with a professor who said a student who was held by North Korea and later died "got exactly what he deserved".

Kathy Dettwyler sparked a backlash on Facebook when she wrote Otto Warmbier was "typical of a mindset of a lot of young, white, rich, clueless males".

Mr Warmbier, 22, died a week after he was freed by North Korea, where he was serving 15 years hard labour.

He was medically evacuated earlier this month and died in a coma.

Ms Dettwyler, an anthropology professor at the University of Delaware, criticised Mr Warmbier in a post on her Facebook page, blaming his parents for what happened to him.

"These are the same kids who cry about their grades because they didn't think they'd really have to read and study the material to get a good grade," she wrote.

"His parents ultimately are to blame for his growing up thinking he could get away with whatever he wanted."

"Maybe in the US, where young, white, rich, clueless white males routinely get away with raping women," she continued.

"Not so much in North Korea. And of course, it's Otto's parents who will pay the price for the rest of their lives."

Show post
Anti-yaoi-guild #homophobia deviantart.com


We're NOT here to start a war against homosexuals. This is against the gay literature and material itself, NOT against the gay population.
....

Some of us have friends that are actually homosexual, and we're ok with that too.
Just because we've decided to start this club does NOT make us homophobes. Actually, we should probably explain what an actual "homophobe" is just to clear the air of any confusion. Just because someone doesn't like to watch homosexual activity does NOT MAKE THAT PERSON A HOMOPHOBE!! A phobia, for those who don't know, is a very strong FEAR, a complete fight/flight response when extreme, of something that in itself is not dangerous. A person that actually suffers from homophobia is a person that is either TERRIFIED of anyone the same sex as the homophobe OR a person who is TERRIFIED of homosexuals and homosexual activities. It can also apply to a person who is terrified of sameness in general and becoming homosexual themselves. Therefore, disliking someone or even hating someone who actually suffers from homophobia, a real homophobe, is really unfair and rather discriminating. So don't go around telling everyone how you dislike homophobes because that really sounds stupid anyways. Is this clear? Good.

Show post
Unidentified vegan activist #fundie bbc.com

A vegan activist in France who posted a Facebook message saying the killing of a butcher by an Islamist militant was "justice" has received a suspended prison sentence, court sources say.

She reportedly wrote that she had "zero compassion" for the victim of the supermarket attack in Trèbes last week.

Her seven-month sentence was issued as punishment for condoning terrorism.

The victim, butcher Christian Medvès, was one of four people killed by gunman Radouane Lakdim on 23 March.

The animal rights activist was prosecuted under France's tough anti-terror laws by a judge at a court in Saint-Gaudens, not far from Toulouse, in the south-west of the country.

Condoning terrorism carries a maximum seven-year jail sentence and a fine of up to €100,000 (£88,000).

Police said they were alerted to her Facebook post on Monday evening.

"So does it shock you that a murderer gets killed by a terrorist? Not me, I have zero compassion for him, there is justice in it," she is said to have posted, according to a judicial source quoted by the French news agency AFP.

France's butchers federation said it had filed a legal complaint over the post, which has since been removed.

The woman's appearance in court came two days after a left-wing activist received a one-year suspended sentence for celebrating the death of another victim of the same attack, gendarme Arnaud Beltrame.

Lt-Col Beltrame, 44, was killed after offering himself in exchange for a hostage being held by Lakdim after he attacked the Super U grocery in Trèbes on Friday.

Col Beltrame was honoured as a national hero at a ceremony in Paris on Wednesday.

Sixteen people were injured, two seriously, in what was the worst jihadist attack under Mr Macron's presidency. The gunman was shot dead by police.

Show post
Stefan Molyneux #racist twitter.com

You know there are modern colour images of white farmers slaughtered by blacks right?

If you keep ginning up racial hatred, the blacks will kill the whites and/or drive them off.

Then the blacks will starve. Avg IQ low 70s

Have some compassion for them all man. Don’t do this.

Show post
Sepean #sexist reddit.com

We often recommend guys with a misbehaving wife to withdraw affection but continue owning his shit. The problem with an FA wife is that not showing her any attention but still doing stuff around the house and with the kids is probably the state she is most comfortable in. In MRP this may be the default OI behavior for her not living up to your standards, and women without attachment issues will become slightly uncomfortable and seek to regain some attention, but an FA wife will not do that. To correct her behavior you will have to "check out".

You emotionally check out of the relationship for a period. Leave the house. Be selfish. Shift chores you'd do unto her. Hog the TV and watch stuff she doesn't like. You need to do this more often and for smaller things than secure girls. Make her earn her way back in your good favor. And don't be afraid to ramp it up, go really cold and aloof - at this point the other end of her attachment issues begin to work in your favor. The fearful response kicks in and she will freak out more than women without attachment issues and be willing to do more to get back in your favor. As always be careful of not seeming butthurt since that isn't sexy, shoot for something more along the lines of her not living up to your expectations, so why does it matter what she wants. Down the line I had to stay disappointed for longer even as she tried to earn her way back in, because she seemed to get the idea she could be a bitch and then just fuck me when she wanted me back. If you’re new to MRP, reward good behavior right away, but you may have to change tactics later to beat her girl game.

Show post
Objective Scrutator #fundie freerepublic.com

This isn't Germany, businesses actually have freedom in the American South. I hope VW is just suffering from Stockholm syndrome, because the last thing we need is a feckless business. I'm not really sure why union members are even allowed to have rights to life, liberty, and property, considering that they are eager to violently deny those very rights to their pragmatic betters.

Show post
Daz the Druid #quack #wtf #conspiracy dazthedruid.blogspot.com

{Vman's note: This is from 2013, but I approved it for its sheer, wonderful nuttery}

Please don't have a go if you take offence to the truth. Go read The Secret History of the world by Jonathon Black, then come back and tell me if you still believe history and authority, because i believe in neither.
And you can really go take a running jump if you don't know how to meditate, because without meditation, the odds of the complainant being wise too are vastly reduced. I am a channel of the higher realms who takes meticulous care(unlike many other channels) before gleaning any information whatsoever. I get guided to truth, books, and people, and people get guided to me; the law of attraction, such a wonderful thing.

thanks for reading...

FOOLPROOF INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASTRAL TRAVEL.

required.
Crystals, bigger the better.
apopholite crystal
a few small zebrastones
lots of spring water
earplugs
blanket

fast for as long as possible(3 days optimum)., drinking only spring water at this time. 2 hours before lift off (better for some reason after dark), start drinking water. lots of water. 1 pint every 20 mins. During this time, if you have lots of crystals available lay them out in two lines either side of you (so you do not touch them with your body) and put some zebrastones in the arrangement too.

When 2 hours up earth yourself as best you can, call on your guardian angel to appear to you and guide you, lay down, loosen your clothing, put the apopholite on your heart chakra, cover yourself over with blanket ensuring you cannot feel it.(being comfortable is a key) do not use a pillow, your head needs to be flat'ish. nothing wrong with something under your head just not elevated) earplugs will ensure your not disturbed. wait a little if you have to to go to the toilet to maximise your flight time.

start concious breathing and mantra to yourself 'I want to leave your body' and enjoy the ride.

when you return, your ears will be ringing like you have been up in a plane

Do not try astral travel after illness or under the influence of drink or drugs. do not travel more than twice weekly.

enjoy

Will leave you with the words of the Buddha before my stuff. best piece of advice anyone could give anyone if you ask me.
'To he who can master his own mind, wisdom will naturally come to him'

GET OFF ALL STATE BENEFITS IN 2 YRS IN WESTERN WORLD ELSE RFID CHIP- DREAM DATED JANUARY 2013

find me a coffee shop that uses spring water and mexican coffee and i will drink there. (The reason i said this was there is lead in the petrol of every coffee producing country except Mexico, and flouride was hitlers most feared chemical weopon)

Dont do dairy heres proof. 2 teas , both with milk, brew 4 same time, but put milk in after brewing 4 1. milk cloggs bag n we are 85% water. (The proof everyone needs that its no good for you and me)

Noone can win any battle against dark, got to manage it usin anything you can. magic rites sigls crystals. (the non jewish kabbalah at its finest: Ultimate truth)

Power of the brains amazin, proven easily. car alarm remote, go well out of range, stick under chin. brain amplifies signal proof brain. (Check also my ode scientific method is wrong below)

Beyer made all the gas for Hitlers gas chambers, and pope JP 2 was the rep...SERIOUSLY. THE CURRENT POPE HITLER YOUTH TOO...CAN YOU SEE THE PATTERN NOW???

trust me there is NOWHERE TO HIDE; KARMIC CHECKS.AND BALANCES EVERYWHERE.(EVERYONES CARDS PERMANENTLY MARKED)

etheric tune ups. just pm me name, dob and town, your guardian angel n the light will do the rest(open offer to all, contribution based)

i will never forget palestine; why? master jesus was from there, is why the torah forbids an israeli state. (and the state of israel worship JC like the god he is not. see my ode god is a 3 letter word)

adam(f adam and eve fame) lived till 670 years of age, and they call it progress???

tonight before bed, glass of water, put your thoughts into the water what u want to dream about, drink the water n dream away

stonehenge was built by magicians with levitation, merlins family, they were showing off, its no sacred site its an ego trip. guided tours of stonehenge and Avebury available (contribution based)

if needed a reason not to shop at Tesco its the horsemeat, another is Master Jesus was from palestine, and tesco fund settlements(in gaza), the blockade will be busted in 2014 i assure
A part of you that believes that abundance can only come from cash, this limits all the other ways can come but u dont see.(bashar on abundance my inspiration for this)
levitation is against all the parameters of modern science on purpose, to disempower, levitation is mind/no-mind/will in one (this belief system don't want us empowered do they????)
secret history of he world-jonathan black, dictionary of angels- Gustav Davidson. other books recommended below, all from the higher realms

Show post
Michael Gibbens #sexist bbc.com

A US judge has found that two girls, aged 13 and 14, were partly to blame in a sex abuse case involving a 67-year-old man - and reduced his sentence.

County District Judge Michael Gibbens said "the victims in this case, in particular, were more an aggressor than a participant in the criminal conduct".

He reduced the sentence of Raymond Soden, who was convicted last year.

Prosecutors are considering an appeal. A child rights group said the girls were the victims, not the aggressors.

Soden was sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison, less than the minimum of 13 years called for by Kansas sentencing guidelines.

The judge said the girls went to Soden's house voluntarily and had taken money for sexual favours.

"They were certainly selling things monetarily that it's against the law for even an adult to sell."

Show post
Lorin Scicluna and Francesco Fenech #racist #psycho stripes.com

VALLETTA, Malta — Two Maltese soldiers have pleaded not guilty to charges they participated in a racially-motivated, fatal drive-by shooting of a migrant from Ivory Coast.

The two men, Lorin Scicluna and Francesco Fenech, were also charged Sunday with the April 6 attempted murder of two other men from Guinea and Gambia, who were seriously injured in the attack. The death of Ivorian Lassana Cisse was believed to be Malta's first-ever racially motivated attack.

The charges, which include racial hatred and committing a racially motivated crime, carry a maximum of life in prison.

Migration is a key political issue for the Mediterranean island nation, particularly ahead of European Parliament elections this week. Maltese political leaders and Catholic Church officials have been speaking out against growing hate speech against migrants, particularly on social media.

Show post
Rick Wiles #racist #fundie rightwingwatch.org

On Wednesday night’s episode of his “TruNews” program, during which he praised Alabama’s radical new anti-abortion law and warned that those who support reproductive rights will spend eternity being “aborted continuously forever” by demons in Hell, End Times broadcaster Rick Wiles also found time to blame Jews for the legalization of abortion in this nation in the first place, declaring that “we would not have abortion in America if it was not for powerful, influential rich Jews in America.”

Wiles returned to that theme on last night’s program, where he read from an op-ed in the Israeli paper Haaretz written by Debra Nussbaum Cohen, in which she argued that Alabama’s law is “a threat to my religious freedom as a Jew … because according to classical Jewish text and most rabbinic interpreters, a developing embryo or fetus is not ‘an unborn child’ or ‘person,’ but has the legal status of an appendage of the pregnant woman. It is part of her body, not a separate person, until the moment that a majority of a viable baby capable of independent life has been born.”

Wiles, who is deeply anti-Semitic and dedicates many of his TruNews programs to railing against Israel and the Jews yet still regularly receives press credentials from the White House, blasted Cohen’s op-ed and boldly declared that Christians are going to take back America from the Jews “and we are going to impose Christian rule.”

“We Christians are standing up and pushing out Zionism,” Wiles said. “That’s what we’re doing. Zionism brought the slaughter of 65 million babies to America and we’re going to end it and we are going to impose Christian rule in this country.”

“Why are you imposing Judaism on me?” he asked. “Because that’s exactly what’s been done in America since 1973 with Roe v. Wade. Judaism was imposed on me, on my Christian nation and we became a Jewish nation that kills babies. That’s against my Christian beliefs … Judaism became the law of the land in America. That’s precisely what the courts have ruled. They have based their rulings on the Zohar, on the Talmud, and now we have Zionistic Talmudic law ruling this country and resulting in the death of millions of babies. And Ms. Cohen, we Christians are standing up and we’re telling you that we’re done with Zionism, we’re done with your values. We are going to impose Christian values in America again, whether you like it or not.”

Wiles went on to declare that Jews have been able to impose their values on America because they controls the banks, the technology, and the media in this country, and have even been able to gain control over most Christian churches through bribery.

Show post
amethystuf #moonbat #wtf reye-chan.tumblr.com

(NOTE: The link leads to a reblog of the post, as the OP has deleted their blog.)

can i just say like telling people not to smoke or drink alcohol while they’re pregnant is ableist and classist as fuck and it needs to stop

first off the majority of smokers/substance abusers are from disadvantaged and poor backgrounds or are struggling with mental health issues and they use it as a coping method so to tell them theyre a bad person for doing that is both classist and ableist

the main argument against it is that your child will come out disabled but honestly if that happens so what??? whats wrong with that??? this whole mindset has deep fucking roots in ableist thought process and im fucking sick of it. like. why do you hate people with disabilities lol

Show post
Incel Wiki #wingnut incels.wiki

Galting is a by-product of non-altruist and Beta Upriser thoughts which leads those on the inceldom spectrum to believe that they should financially punish bluepilled normies of society for its apathy towards inceldom. This is done by contributing as little tax as possible, through either the off-gridder lifestyle, by refusing to betabux or other similar lifestyle choices wherein taxation is minimal. It is a form of protest characterized by economical subversion of society, such as participating in brain drain, refusing to invest within society, divestment from pro-feminist companies and boycottage of bluepilled brands.

It is a Gandhistic variation of the Beta Uprising.

Show post
KatieMarie999 #fundie #wingnut katiemarie999.tumblr.com

@Anonymous

Katie, I just want to tell you I don't give a rat's ass that you think we can still be friends because I honestly wouldn't touch your raw chicken looking ass with a ten foot pole... anyone propagating that a clump of cellular life is more important than the financial, medical and psychological wellbeing of an already existing human being is a fucking sociopath


Sociopath: a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

I’m impressed that you’ve been able to diagnose me and about 50% of the population with a personality disorder based solely on one position on one issue.

I mean if you’re on anon, I assume you’re not someone I’ve ever spoken to before because I have faith in my friends and even in the people who just follow me from a distance. They’re good people, regardless of what side they’re on. And I don’t believe any of them would ever send hate anons to anyone. I hope one day, the same can be said for you.

I’m not going to have an argument with you. I don’t want to waste my time trying to talk to someone so intolerant that they’re willing to send something this immature. So here is a lovely pro-life master post someone made. Lots of great information about embryology and the ways the pro-life movement are helping women in need.

I don’t reach my beliefs or positions blindly, which is why I don’t align myself with a political party or with either liberalism or conservatism. I don’t sit here twirling my fake mustache asking myself “how can I hurt and oppress my own sex today for no reason?” If that’s what you think about the pro-life cause, perhaps you should do some research. I’d recommend logging off tumblr, to start.

Show post
Some incels #sexist #transphobia np.reddit.com

Re: I'm Shocked, Who would have guessed ITcels is filled with trannies?

image

(LyricThrowAgay)

God I love when women go trans. That dipshit is in for one hell of a rude Awakening.

(Fakercel)

yeah ahahaha, she won't be able to keep giving platitudes like just have confidence, and put yourself out there and respect women for long when she realizes none of them want her.

(JucheforWhitePeople)

They'll be posting on r/detrans in no time. Almost all of them were FtM trannies who thought being a male would be easier.

(SaintcopeceI)

Life Fuel indeed. Thanks for sharing the sub. That sub is hilarious in which proves that living life as a man is not as privileged than being a woman. So much for muh patriarchy and muh privilege. JFL at those idiotic roasties.

(MayflyEng)

Thanks for linking that sub. The vast majority of trans people are MTF, yet that sub is 76% regretful ftm.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Show post
Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

you can put powdered sugar on a turd .... i does not then become a jelly donut ..... you defend DEPRAVITY ....... you are for abortion so you really do not care for children ..... so therefore you defend what pedophiles do ...... and the people using homosexual topics to make cartoons for children about sexual DEPRAVITY of HOMOMIRAGE ..... IS PEDOPHILIA ......

AND YOU DEFEND IT ..... BY DEFAULT .... YOU DEFEND PEDOPHILES AND WHAT THEY DO ..... you are not a real man ...... you are a homosexualist .... one who supports depravity ......... is that bigoted .... then .... COUNT ME IN ........

Show post
innocent_butungu & Administrative_Worth #sexist #homophobia #transphobia np.reddit.com

image

(innocent_butungu)

Can lesbians be incel? I'm honestly not sure, we need some high-IQ-cels to conduct a scientific study.

If lesbians existed, probably. But reality is lesbians do not exist. Lesbians are just etero girls going bisexual for shit and giggles.

The only true lesbians are basically FtM trans without gender dysphoria

(Administrative_Worth)

Reminder that women can get women easier than us. And most have already at some point.

So fucking true. Women's preference for fuckng goes chad, chad-lite, and high tier stacies. Stacy's becky's. 5.5/10 guys, Dogs, and then genetic trash both male and female. Male, below 3.5 women see you as trash, foids, below 2.5 you're genetic trash.

Show post
Lawrence C Makin Snr #conspiracy #wingnut books.google.co.uk

General Kelly, accompanied by another dozen individuals including Sean Dominguez and Joe Annino, approached the door to the private residence. The door was opened for them and they entered the residence. Obama looked at them.

“What are you doing in here I have not summoned you, get out now!” He demanded.

They just stood there staring at him. Obama repeated himself in a much louder “Get out.”

General Kelly did not say a word. As Obama watched dumbfounded, Kelly pushed the play button. Obama heard his speech from the East room of the White House to the mullahs. A frantic look came over him, as he screamed at the Secret Service and FBI agents.

“Arrest him, get them out of here!”

No one made any move; Obama sank down onto the sofa and began to whimper.

“I am The President of the United States.”

They all just stared at him. General Kelly spoke in a voice filled with contempt. “You were never worthy of holding the office of President of this great republic. In the name of the people of the United States of America, I arrest you and charge you with treason, with failing, no not even failing, with deliberately lying to the American people, violating our laws both knowingly and intentionally, and I will tell you, coming very close to destroying this country. Get him out of here.”

As soon as the general spoke, Secret Service Agents grabbed Obama by the arms and pulled him to his feet. Obama fell to the floor and cried hysterically. The agents picked him up bodily and carried him out to the waiting marine helicopter; he would not be travelling on Marine One or Air Force One ever again. The Obama family had watched in silence as the scene played out before them. They silently followed the agents out to the helicopter and, along with a dozen agents, boarded the copter that would take them to Camp David where Obama would be held in isolation until the next President decided his fate.

As the copter was lifting off from the White House lawn, a motorcade carrying Senator Rand Paul entered the White House grounds.

Show post
Dennis Markuze #fundie #psycho scienceblogs.com

i will execute you. the police wont save you

God told me to MURDER you...

pz and his entire family will burn in HELL...
police won't save that fucker from me...

you will be executed without mercy...

you have forfeit your lives...
and the police wont save you...

see, the entire university is going to be destroyed because of blaspheming PZ...
this will be sent to every member of the University...

police won't save that fucker from me...

did you know that blasphemy is punishable by DEATH and I am here to execute all of you?

Show post
John Howard #sexist #homophobia #transphobia #ufo #wtf wehuntedthemammoth.com

Congress needs to protect people from exploitation by giving them full information about their reproductive rights. Males only have a right to produce with their own genitals, they don't have a right to gestate a baby in a box or make eggs from stem cells.

[...]

[M]y comment was about the future. Trans women will never be allowed to gestate, even with future technology from aliens. Congress will ban it and end gay marriage so kids are taught the truth about the future and their reproductive rights.

Show post
Stefan Molyneux #racist #quack #ableism twitter.com

@Scientific American

ADHD is typically described by the problems it presents, but it may also provide an advantage: the ability to think more creatively
“ADHD” grew in proportion to mass immigration.
Hyper-creative white boys got crazy bored with dumbed-down value-less “education.”
Show post
Judge Jim Lammey #racist #conspiracy jta.org

(JTA) — A Tennessee judge posted racist and anti-Semitic articles on his Facebook page, including one saying that Jews should “get the f**k over the Holocaust.”

A coalition of organizations, including Jewish ones, have called for a reprimand of Jim Lammey of the Shelby County Criminal Court.

Lammey posted a link to an article written by known Holocaust denier David Cole that referred to Muslim immigrants as “foreign mud” and made the Holocaust slur. He also shared anti-immigration articles, memes and conspiracy theories, The Commercial Appeal reported.

The judge has denied being racist or anti-Semitic and says he has the right to free speech, according to the report. He also says that nothing that he has shared on Facebook would prevent him from judging all cases fairly.

“I certainly don’t agree with that, being a Holocaust denier. My best friend — who’s deceased now — was Jewish and I wouldn’t do that,” he told The Commercial Appeal.

Lammey said that he accidentally allowed his Facebook posts to be public earlier this year. They are now no longer visible to the public.

He was elected to office in 2006 and re-elected to serve an eight-year term in 2014.

Among the Jewish groups that have called for Lammey’s censure are the Anti-Defamation League Southeast Region, Jewish Federation and Jewish Foundation of Nashville & Middle Tennessee, Jewish Community Partners and the Tennessee Holocaust Commission. Others include the NAACP Memphis Branch, Memphis Islamic Center, American Muslim Advisory Council, Bridges, Facing History and Ourselves, Memphis Islamic Center and the National Civil Rights Museum.

Show post
Ray Comfort #fundie m.facebook.com

www.livingwaters.com
"Jews laugh at Christianity."

Jesus was Jewish. The disciples were Jewish. The first 13,000 converts were Jewish, Christianity was birthed in the land of the Jews, the New Testament was written by Jews, and Christians believe that the Jewish scriptures are God's Word. I'm Jewish, and any Jew who believes the God-breathed Old Testament will embrace Jesus of Nazareth as their promised Messiah.

Show post
Mencius Moldbug #fundie unqualified-reservations.blogspot.de

(Extract from A gentle introduction to Unqualified Reservations (part 1))

First, we need to define left and right. In my opinion, obviously a controversial one, the explanation for this mysterious asymmetric dimension is easy: it is political entropy. Right represents peace, order and security; left represents war, anarchy and crime.

Because values are inherently subjective, it is possible to argue that left can be good and right can be bad. For example, you can say that the Civil War was good - the North needed to conquer the South and free the slaves.

On the other hand, it is also quite easy to construct a very clean value system in which order is simply good, and chaos is simply evil. I have chosen this path. It leaves quite a capacious cavity in the back of my skull, and allows me to call myself a reactionary. To you, perhaps, it is the dark side. But this is only because the treatment is not yet complete.

Whatever you make of the left-right axis, you have to admit that there exists some force which has been pulling the Anglo-American political system leftward for at least the last three centuries. Whatever this unfathomable stellar emanation may be, it has gotten us from the Stuarts to Barack Obama. Personally, I would like a refund. But that's just me.

It is time to understand this force. My theory is that what we're looking at is the attraction of power itself. The left attracts a natural coalition because it always attracts those whose only interest is in the pure thrill of domination. Most will join them through peer pressure alone, leaving only the misfits.

Let's look, for a minute, at the minds of the people who hold these positions of power. Your R1 professors, your Times reporters, and so on. These are, of course, very competitive jobs, and only a tiny minority of the people who want them and are capable of doing them will get to have them. They have certainly worked very hard to get where they are. And they perceive that effort as one made in the interest of humanity at large.

I think the salaries at this level are reasonable, but it is not money that makes people want these jobs. It is power, which brings with it status. I define power as personal influence over important events; I don't know of any other definition.

One of the key reasons that intellectuals are fascinated by disorder, in my opinion, is the fact that disorder is an extreme case of complexity. And as you make the structure of authority in an organization more complex, more informal, or both - as you fragment it, eliminating hierarchical execution structures under which one individual decides and is responsible for the result, and replacing them with highly fragmented, highly consensual, and highly process-oriented structures in which ten, twenty or a hundred people can truthfully claim to have contributed to the outcome, you increase the amount of power, status, patronage, and employment produced.

Of course, you also make the organization less efficient and effective, and you make working in it a lot less fun for everyone - you have gone from startup to Dilbert. This is Brezhnevian sclerosis, the fatal disease of organizations in a highly regulated environment. All work is guided by some systematic process, in which each rule was contributed by someone whose importance was a function of how many rules he added. In the future, we will all work for the government. Individually, this is the last thing your average intellectual wants to do, but it is the direction in which his collective acts are pushing us.

In short: intellectuals cluster to the left, generally adopting as a social norm the principle of pas d'ennemis a gauche, pas d'amis a droit, because like everyone else they are drawn to power. The left is chaos and anarchy, and the more anarchy you have, the more power there is to go around. The more orderly a system is, the fewer people get to issue orders. The same asymmetry is why corporations and the military, whose system of hierarchical executive authority is inherently orderly, cluster to the right.

Once the cluster exists, however, it works by any means necessary. The reverence of anarchy is a mindset in which an essentially Machiavellian, tribal model of power flourishes. To the bishops of the Cathedral, anything that strengthens their influence is a good thing, and vice versa. The analysis is completely reflexive, far below the conscious level. Consider this comparison of the coverage between the regime of Pinochet and that of Castro. Despite atrocities that are comparable at most - not to mention a much better record in providing responsible and effective government - Pinochet receives the full-out two-minute hate, whereas the treatment of Castro tends to have, at most, a gentle and wistful disapproval.

This is because Pinochet's regime was something completely alien to the American intellectual, whereas - the relationship between Puritan divines and Bolshevism being exactly as the mad Arab, Abdul Alhazred, says - Castro's regime was something much more understandable. If you sketch the relative weights of the social networks connecting Pinochet to the Cathedral, versus Castro to the Cathedral, you are comparing a thread to a bicep.

Show post
Some incels #sexist np.reddit.com

Re: Found on IT. The memes write themselves

image

(RadiantUpstairs)

Confirmed from IRL conversation.

"I'd date a guy my height, it's just, like, all guys are over 6'2, where would I even meet a guy under 6'2?"

"Are you serious? Maybe you just don't even register guys under 6'2"

"... oh, wow, I never thought about that..."

(Dorkydor)

I'm starting to think those comments are some kind of conspiracy or something. There are hundreds of comments like that worded almost exactly the same, describing the same situation with the same argument

(MentalAnon)

There is such a thing as the wrong person to say something, whether they're correct or not. Even if it really was true that she wouldn't mind dating a short guy at all and her current boyfriend being tall is a coincidence and outlier, it still undermines her credibility to admit as much. It's a pretty basic concept in rhetoric. Naturally, foids are completely unable to argue using anything but pathos. It's kinda like the ultralogical hyperautists without an empathetic bone in their body who are poor at convincing people no matter how correct they are, except for women it's all about feelings instead. For women, though, it's considered totally normal and acceptable. Even convincing to the soyboys. Really weird world we live in.

Show post
GoodTidings #fundie #homophobia baptistboard.com

Christians are persecuted in America. The persecution of the baker who would not make a cake for a gay wedding was just such a case. He was not subjecting anyone to his Christian beliefs. Rather, he was being told to bow to the demands of homosexuals or face prosecution. He didn't bow, they prosecuted him and they lost and freedom of religion won. Freedom of religion is not the stifling of rights of Christians to openly practice their faith.

The truth is that the Left continues to show us the kind of Stalinist police-state they would subject America to if they ever get their hands on the levers of power in this country.

Show post
Pete Hegseth #wingnut #fundie foxnews.com

Graduates, it's time to unlearn college

[...] The vast majority of graduation speakers are leftists and Democrats, predictably extolling diversity, globalism, identity politics, gender empowerment and – of course – climate change. Most graduates hungover and bored, absorb the platitudes. After the speech, a degree in hand, the indoctrination is complete. [...]
I simply want to highlight three stark realities that students and parents should know, rather than accept the onslaught of advice from liberals, leftists, and Democrats. A little common sense that otherwise gets missed in the mad rush to get a degree.

First, you just wasted a lot of time and money.
Plenty of students drift through four-year colleges because, well, that’s what you do. I did the same thing. Now you have a degree you didn’t really need, and mountains of debt to boot. A better option for many students is a non-ideological, private-sector vocational or trade school. Schools focused on specific skills that actually prepare you to get real jobs with great pay.

Predictably, Democrats want to destroy private-sector higher education in favor of their existing network of cash-machine indoctrination camps. Democrats are using a simple, but effective, playbook to destroy private sector higher education: define taxpaying colleges as evil, propose policies to restrict access to private career colleges and offer “free” public college to the masses as a solution. It’s false but sounds great. Nothing is free – you might not have learned that in Economics 101.

The mafia of higher education – just like government-run public high schools – seeks to demagogue and destroy all competing educational opportunities and choices. Our only option, at this level and every level of our education system, is to rebel. Start our own schools, advance for-profit colleges, homeschool our kids, and challenge the government-run, public-school orthodoxy.

Even the “good schools” with shiny new buildings and small classroom sizes are infected with liberal indoctrination. Assume nothing. Watchdog everything. Does your kid’s school say the Pledge of Allegiance? You probably don’t know (and don’t want to know). What holiday is more important at your kid’s school – Earth Day or Veterans Day? Or Presidents Day? Don’t even try to mention God – that could get you expelled. Public, government-run institutions are P.C. indoctrination camps. Our only hope is private sector schools and vigilant private citizens.

Second, most of what you just learned is garbage.
How much time during your education did you study civics, U.S. history, or the Constitution? Did you learn about how our founding generation viewed human nature and government, or just that they were slave owners? Did you ever study the Bible (the textbook of Western Civilization) – or just deconstruct academic skepticism about the life of Jesus? (The very Ivy League institutions founded on biblical education now loathe Christianity, must I say more).

Or, instead, were you required to take courses on gender studies, ethnic studies, and the lost art of underwater basket weaving? It’s not that we shouldn't study the plight of women and minorities in American history – of course, we should. The problem is that most students leave college (and middle school!) with a strong sense of America’s sins, and very little idea of why America is the freest, most fair, most tolerant, most just, most prosperous, and most powerful country in human history. The American “experiment” has worked…if we teach it.

The perfect example of the listlessness of higher education today comes from Harvard Law School – the so-called gold-standard of law schools. Law students who matriculate there are not required to take a class on…wait for it…the U.S. Constitution. We are now looking at a generation of high-powered lawyers who may or may not understand the greatest political document in human history. It’s lunacy, and very dangerous.

Finally, your real education starts now. No more safe spaces or trigger warnings. Your debt needs to be paid off, the world doesn’t care about your feelings, and your parents’ basement is embarrassing. You have your life in front of you – and a country that needs you. Get to work, follow your passions, and – if necessary – get the skills somewhere else that you actually need to achieve the American dream.
You may have wasted a lot of time and money in college, but so did everyone else. Now is the time to open up your Bible, pick up a history book, and get a job. History is not over, and you can choose to be a part of it. Toss your cap and gown in the garbage (you’ll never wear them again) and join the American experiment. We’re hiring: Patriots wanted!

Show post
r00000000 #sexist #fundie np.reddit.com

I always thought NPC meme was really disrespectful when I first saw it and was just a way to strawman people, but then I talked to these type of people that spend all their time on subs like IT, niceguys, etc., and like 90% of them are the exact same, even off reddit (which is where I think the "women can sense your online misogyny" thing comes from because they assume everyone is like them and acts the same on and off internet).

Not even just opinions because you could say that about any community, but the things the say regarding those opinions, the way they type, it's literally like they're all the same person typing it. I've seen so many posts saying the exact same thing, nearly word for word, on 4chan, IT, etc.

Show post
Rev. Kenneth Molyneaux #racist #wtf #psycho creativityalliance.com

[Rules of the role-playing game "Racial Holy War"]

Sometime in the near future, the world is torn by chaos, anarchy, and mayhem as the world has been devastated by the non-White population growth. All the lands of the world have been overrun by these despicable hordes while the noble White Man has been reduced to a tiny minority, barely surviving the terrors unleashed by the heinous forces of the malicious Jew.

Many scholars predicted the ravaged Earth that oppresses the superior White Race but few yielded these concerns. As a direct result, all civilization has been destroyed in a fiery blaze of disaster.

There is hope though. A small, yet growing, force is gaining power and is dedicated to cleansing the world of all the vermin. This band of White Warriors knows full well that defeat is not an option. Either they will carry the banner of the White Race to form a grandiose White Empire or all will be consumed in cold, dark blackness.

You are one of those warriors. Shall you arm yourself for battle or will you watch the beautiful White Women die? The choice is simple. The Racial Holy War will ensure triumphant victory. That victory is inevitable. RAHOWA!

[...]

There are 5 basic enemies in Racial Holy War--niggers, sand niggers, latrinos, gooks, and kikes. Each enemy has different strengths and weaknesses. Each also has a special attack that is more effective depending on the ability of the enemy. As such, the enemies do not have skills like the White Warriors, but do have a special attack. These special attacks can be employed in place of an attack, once per character per round of combat. The enemy chooses which White Warrior he wishes to use his special attack on and it therefore only effects that character, if successful. If it fails, no effect occurs and that enemy is done for the round (so can’t use a special attack and a normal attack in same round). Some enemies can use their special attacks and some normal attacks during a round of combat though (a single enemy just can’t use both in one round). The special attacks are more potent and more likely to succeed the more skilled the enemy is. To determine whether the special attacks are successful, the enemy must roll a so sided die and get a roll that is equal to or less than the designated number (depending on enemy). The effect and specifics of the special attacks are listed below.

Nigger
Niggers are smelly and stupid creatures who tend to possess thick skulls. These beasts are one of nature’s worst specimen, and it is the duty of a White Warrior to eradicate them at every possible chance. Their special attack is known as Stench and, if successful, the powerful odor that a nigger exudes.

[...]

Latrino
Latrinos are lazy and criminal vermin who waste valuable air on Earth, that should be reserved for Nature’s Finest--the White Race. Due to their history of illegal immigration, they are adept at crossing borders and sneaking around. Therefore their special attack is known as Stealth. This skill, if successful, allows the latrino to attack first as part of the special attack.

[...]

Sand Nigger
Sand Niggers are scumbags that have a militant religion in Islam. They have declared the White Race as one of their many enemies in their "Jihad" or holy war. Woe to the sand nigger who meets a White Warrior on the battlefield. Due to their fanatical faith, the special attack possessed by sand niggers is known as a Suicide Run. If successful, the sand nigger blows himself and a White Warrior up (sand nigger automatically dies while target White Warrior suffers damage); but if he fails, he simply perishes with a loud boom.

[...]

Gook
Gooks are timid, annoying, slanty-eyed pieces of excrement that so desperately wish they were White. Of course, they are not. They have reproduced quite prolifically and there is no doubt that the world will be a better place without them. From watching fake martial arts movies, the gooks have acquired an increased proficiency in hand-to-hand fighting. Therefore, this talent can only be applied with hand-to-hand fighting. If successful, this ability increases the amount of attacks that the character gets (a successful role means the gook goes on to attack as many times as his skill level designates) for that round of combat. If he fails, he doesn’t attack.

[...]

Kike
Kikes are undoubtedly the worst and most evil parasites that the world has over seen. They pervert all that is holy, honorable, and just. Once the kikes are removed, the formation of a glorious White Empire is but a step away. Through the years of lying, manipulation, and outright debauchery, the kike has succeeded through brain pollution. This talent is manifested in the kike’s special attack of Bribery.
A kike must spend 50 credits to do utilize this ability every time he uses it (credits are subtracted from kike’s total credits). If successful, the targeted White Warrior loses his turn for that round. If it fails, then the money is spent and target White Warrior receives the credits with no adverse affects. The kike is able to increase his chances of success by spending 50 credits per Bribe attempt to gain a point (up to 20, which is automatic success). This means that a Perfidious Kike, with a special attack value of 10, could add 50 credits to his Bribe and therefore need an 11 or less to achieve success (on a roll of a 20 sided die). Or, he could spend 500 (50 times 10) credits on the Bribe and bring the special attack value to 20, which is an automatic success.

[...]

The primary purpose of Racial Holy War is to provide entertainment to those loyal to the White Race. It as an experience where our dedicated White Warriors can do like many of us want to--slaughter the foul enemies of our people who are destroying our race. I therefore hope that it does allow our comrades to crush our enemies.
The world created in Racial Holy War is one of strife and mayhem where the White Warriors fight to bring about a glorious White Empire. If the laws of this realm do not conform to the tastes of some, then they can obviously change them. Someone might not like this or that rule, so change or get rid of this or that rule.
The important aspect is to have fun.
Input is very welcome and changes to the game are very possible. Any improvements to the game would also be optional and up to the players playing.
Of course for those who play strictly by the rules, then this is fine as that is what the rules are there for. In conclusion, have fun building a Whiter, Brighter World! RAHOWA!

Show post
Ruthless #racist stormfront.org

Re: All-girls robotics team from Ghana wins World Robofest Championship in the U.S.

Some more digging around into this. Appatently these negresses didn't design a robot and don't know crap about robotics. The competition is done completely with LEGO Mindstorm "robots." LEGO Mindstorms are basically a super fancy remote controlled car. These stupid bitches won a contest where several of the 10 overall categories are judging the "robot" for looks like you do for boyscouts toy derby cars. One of the categories is actually how well the "robot" looks in the robot parade. They let all the retards take their robots out for a spin to show off to all the mommies and daddies. Lol

Homes - Mindstorms LEGO.com

These retarded blacks didn't even purchase the LEGO Mindstorm themselves. Texas A&M University donated it to them AND taught them how to use it because they were too stupid to figure it out for themselves.

Bringing Robotics To Girls In Ghana - Texas A&M Today

And everyone received a medal for participating in this retarded "robotics" competition.

Quote:

All registered participants received medals and personalized certificates while winners of qualifying and championship rounds received trophies.
Show post
Krešimir Bagarić #fundie #psycho #homophobia index.hr

{Translation from Croatian by Vman; translator's notes will be given in brackets and italicized, like this}

The Matija Gubec school in Zagreb's Knežžija quarter has a peculiar catechist {= teacher of Religious Education}. While Krešimir Bagarić ought to be teaching his pupils Catholic catechesis, love and forgiveness, he instead tells them which Croatian politicians ought to be killed, whose heads should be impaled on a spike, and he also praises a war criminal, the Serb general Ratko Mladić.


Pupils encourage the catechist in his hatred

Index has obtained a recording of Bagarić's ranting at a lecture for an eighth grade class. One of the pupils recorded it. This is not the first time Bagarić has acted this way, so the child summoned the courage to tape the catechist and deliver the recording to Index. Some children's voices were changed and surnames hidden in the recording in order to protect their identities - even the voices of those who are star pupils and encourage their teacher's hatred.

{audio of Bagarić's rant (in Croatian)}


Impaling people on a spike, all the way to Rijeka and Zagreb

For starters, teacher Bagarić explained to the pupils how he thinks Operation Storm should have looked like.

“We're fools, we should have allowed two corridors {for the Serb refugees and army that were fleeing}. One to Zagreb, the other to Rijeka {major cities in Croatia, they hadn't been occupied by Serb forces}. So after their [citizens'] heads were impaled on spikes, then we come in. That's what should have happened to the fine gentlemen in Zagreb who think that Croatia ends in Karlovac {a city not very far from Zagreb that was on the frontlines during the war}. Idiots and cretins. Short-sighted,” Bagarić put forth as his tactical plan. But that wasn't enough for him. The recording was made in the immediate aftermath of the verdict against Slobodan Praljak, so Bagarić dedicated most of his presentation to the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, throwing in praise for the [war] crimes [Bosnian Serb army general and Chief of Staff] Ratko Mladić committed against the Bosniaks.


The General was right

“It turns out that the General was right. He protected his own people. The General was right when it comes to Serb interests. While we have suckers. With all due respect to suckers. Even a teacher can be crazy sometimes,” Bagarić added a bit of self-criticism along with the praise.

Following his praise for the man who ordered the killing of thousands of Muslims [in Srebrenica], who kept [Bosnian capital city] Sarajevo under siege for years, who prior to that had no qualms about killing [Croatian] people in Dalmatia, Bagarić then expounded to the students on who in Croatia ought to be killed.


Hanging, suicide with three bullets to the back, being thrown into a septic tank

“Two former presidents and one former minister of foreign affairs ought to be hanged for this, right away. On the double. The man {Stipe Mesić, former President of Croatia} opened the presidential safe and gave away the transcripts. Damn your family to the seventh generation, you traitor. Filthy, smelly traitor. May you never have peace,” the catechist cursed during religious ed class. But a curse and the invocation of hanging weren't enough for him. Bagarić gave other suggestions as well.

“You have the minister of foreign affairs, Vesna Pusić, who speaks openly around the world. You don't have that anywhere but here. Try to imagine a French minister doing a single thing against the Republic. You'll just disappear. Take your pick - heart attack, brain stroke, suicide with three bullets to the back, however it goes. Only we give our prostitutes and traitors important positions.

Only we are such a pathetic nation, there is no nation more pathetic than the Croats,” claimed Bagaric, who has an interesting perspective on Christian love. Bagarić once more returned to the subject of Mesić and Vesna Pusić, stating that they require “a bullet to the head on the double. Throw them into the nearest septic tank. The traitor.”


Croats are 4.2 million cretins

In addition to the aforementioned insults, Bagarić graced the Croatian people with epithets such as “ungrateful rabble, morons, cretins, dunces, 4.2 million cretins”. We repeat, this was during religious education classes.

“We've got neoliberal democratic cretins who think gay is ok and that all of us ought to hold hands together under the rainbow flag,” teacher Bagarić said, adding a bit of homophobic message. At one moment he also commented on his colleagues, the teachers of the Matija Gubec Elementary School.


The colleagues celebrate the Day of the Republic

“You know, in the staff room, it's the Day of the Republic* for 50 percent of the employees,” he claimed, probably considering them to be Yugoslavs or at the very least nostalgic for the former state.

{* The Day of the Republic was a holiday during the socialist Yugoslavia. It was celebrated on the 29th of November. By accusing people of celebrating it, Bagarić wants to imply that they are closet Yugoslavs (read: traitors), closet communists (read: godless traitors) and/or hate everything Croat. All of which are unicorn concepts in modern day Croatia, that is, they are almost non-existent. Simply put, he's basically verbally bludgeoning everyone to the left of Donald Trump.}

We asked the school's principal, Ljiljana Klinger, for an explanation regarding the way Bagarić holds his classes. She answered a few of our questions very briefly.


The principal uses the Vatican Agreements as a cop-out

“In accordance with the Agreements between the Holy See and the Republic of Croatia, the appointment of catechists is within the juristiction of the Catechist Office, as is the responsibility for catechists' professional development and progress. That said, if these allegations are accurate and truthful, there is no doubt that serious professional and legal sanctions will be undertaken. For such drastic offenses we are also obliged to involve the other relevant institutions,” replied the principal of the school, which is - in addition to children from the Knežžija quarter - also attended by the children of foreign diplomats and foreigners working in Zagreb. The school, part of whose teaching is done in the English language, has long been reputed to be one of the best schools in Zagreb, having earned the City of Zagreb Award.

Show post
Faustus Crow #fundie #wtf faustuscrow.wordpress.com

(FSTDT fanfiction!)

This is an answer for the Reptilian Jew and the FSTDT coven:

Pharaoh Bastethotep: “Okay, I’d like to commmission a voluptous torbie catgirl in pearly power armour, riding a kirin through an alien fungal jungle with a tricorder in her hand, from outa my Tulpa creating lamp, of an Illuminated Fiery brain.”
image
Vman: “Dafuq, did I just read yer right? That’s, Airily politically incorrect…Bastethotep… Better to Flee, before you’ll get picked up by the Thought-Police for that porny Entartete Kunst comment”
image
Pharaoh Bastethotep: “Damn it to Fiery Amenta! Okay, I’d like to commmission a transgender cat-girl-boy in black power armour, riding a drone through the policed urban jungle, with a rainbow flag in her-his, its, Fornicating hand, from outa my over-watched brain.”
image
Adey: “Sheesh! Drinking the bong Water is not a good idea. So quit doing it guys. Fight your addiction! As the great joker said, “I don’t do Drugs, I am Drugs.”
image
Anon-e-moose: “Don’t know about the others intake of addictive Foods on this here FSTDT coven forum. But I don’t do drugs, Adey; I’m going cyber druggie beyond my Earthy Persona.
image
Anon-e-moose: continues: “The 55 Gb installation file for “DOOM IV” is downloadable via the Bethesda/id Software site, no box required. Get with the times, ‘boys and girls;’ its yer reactive Reptilian-brain-stem, which is initiating these Elemental four F’s games.”

Show post
bishop Vlado Košić #conspiracy #racist vijesti.rtl.hr

{Original text in Croatian; translation and explanations by me, Vman. The bolded parts in Košić's speech are ones that I considered especially WTF.}

THE SPEECH OF BISHOP KOŠIĆ
'Ustashism was not fascism, it was organized military action in the defense of Croatia as a country'

26th Oct 2017

The bishop of Sisak, Vlado Košić, gave a speech at the presentation of a book about Marko Perković Thompson* which was written by academician Josip Pečarić. Many media outlets have reported Košić's speech in which he made the claim that some people are forcibly trying to shut up both the singer and academician Pečarić. We relay Košić's speech in its entirety:

* {Vman's note: Thompson is a far-right singer notorious for his pro-Ustashe leanings. During World War II, the Ustashe were basically the Croatian equivalent of the Nazis. Anyway, here's Košić's speech:}

I wish we had more brave people such as the famed singer Marko Perković Thompson and academician Josip Pečarić.

Those who have no arguments would like to forcibly silence them: thus they ban famed singer Marko from having concerts, put forth criminal charges against him on count of public order disturbance, they defame his reputation and declare his work to be - outright fascist. Such people also use every means available against academician Pečarić just in order to silence him, they persecute his family, and - they most often ignore him.

However, both these great men - Croats and patriots - are people of whom our Homeland should be proud. Maybe in some future time, when we are freed of - as per the song of bishop Ante Ivas - all those traitors, perjurers, fraudsters, and also - as so poetically said by [far-right minor politician] Anto Kovačević - all the drpislavs {thieves}; only in a future, calmer history of Croatia will these great people of ours, Marko and Josip, be given their rightful place, a place of the utmost respect.

[...]

This book bears witness to the greatness of these two Croatian men, to honest men in dishonest times, to great men in times of small souls, to the audacity of the few who dare to be bold during times of betrayal. This is why their trail will be an inspiration to future generations, and in twenty or thirty years books will be written about them, films made and they will be an example of bravery in the struggle against the evil which is destroying the truth and our homeland.

[...]

Marko the singer and Josip the academician are being linked to the salute "Za dom spremni!".* It's interesting to note why this patriotic salute is being contested and by whom, and to note how the state reacts to it. Firstly, it ought to be said that this salute was spontaneously used during the Homeland War, and not only by the members of the Croatian Defense Forces (Hrvatske Obrambene Snage, HOS) who included it in their coat of arms, but also by the "Tigrovi" and the "Gromovi".** There are YouTube recordings of this. Interestingly enough, nobody was bothered by it at that time.

* {"Za dom spremni!" means "For home(land), ready!". This was the official Ustashe salute and is our equivalent of "Heil Hitler!"}
** {the Tigrovi (Tigers) and the Gromovi (Thunders) were respectively the 1st and 2nd Guards Brigade of the Croatian Army, and before it of its main predecessor force, the Croatian National Guard}

Likewise, nobody used to be bothered by the fact that Marko uttered that war cry in his first patriotic song, Bojna Čavoglave. The witch-hunt on both Marko and that salute began only two or three years ago, with everyone who used it being accused of ustashism and fascism. Firstly, it ought to be said that ustashism wasn't fascism, but rather an organized military action in the defense of Croatia as a country. Both Blessed Alojzije Stepinac and {Croatia's first president} dr Franjo Tuđman have spoken positively about the nature of the {WW2-era} state of Croatia. The Ustashe defended Croatia using all "permissible and impermissible means", which was a part of their oath.

That illegality, that is, those impermissible means are of course not acceptable to us as Christians. Neither are the crimes they had committed, and which the Church condemns, although it should be noted that they were an answer to the numerous Chetnik and Partisan crimes. But why did it, in recent years, come to the public political and police persecution of the "Za dom spremni!" salute and the people who use it - yet throughout the 25 years following the Homeland War this had not happened? Let's take a moment to remember the lawsuits against Joe Šimunić* initiated by the association 'Korak Ispred' from Rijeka, an association led by a Serb named Zoran Stevanović.

* {Joe Šimunić is a soccer player who landed into hot water when, during a game, he took a microphone and yelled four times "Za dom!", to which the audience responded with the second part of the salute ("Spremni!"). A video of the incident can be found here.}

Furthermore, let us remember that the Serbian politician Aleksandar Vulin repeatedly called out the current Croatia due to "ustashization and fascization". Other Serbian pro-Chetnik politicians did this as well. But it was actually the Croatian politicians who gave them cause for this when, led by the country's former President and then also the Prime Minister, they spoke of the "Ustashe viper" and accused Croats of "a turn towards ustashism". First they did this in the Jewish Knesset, then when the new government under the leadership of Tomislav Karamarko was being formed.

There was no evidence for any of this. On the other hand, there was more and more evidence that the governmental structures in Croatia still have plenty of UDBA* men and criminals - or their sons - who murdered many Croats, whether abroad, in Croatia or in Bosnia and Herzegovina. I too think that this loud witch-hunt for non-existent Ustashe was launched by the very people who were afraid of being subjected to lustration, which is increasingly being called for as a realistic and necessary option for Croatia's legislature.

* {UDBA is an acronym for the State Security Administration (Uprava držžavne bezbednosti), which was one of the names that was used for the state security service / secret police of socialist Yugoslavia.}

[...]

Anyway, I will openly say that the political demands of the representatives of the defeated Serb minority in Croatia, a minority which had - together with Serbia and the Yugoslav People's Army - initiated a rebellion against Croatia, are based upon myths and lies. They are now also supported by Serbia's official politics, because it is once again ruled by Chetniks. Unfortunately, they also have the support of the Serb Orthodox Church. These myths and lies include not only the interpretation of Jasenovac {as an Ustashe-run death camp for Serbs, Jews, Roma and political prisoners], but also the role of the Blessed Alojzije Stepinac, of the Srb Uprising which is actually a celebration of the massacre of Croats rather than of an antifascist revolution, then the statue in Banski Grabovac, as well as the fabrication of a non-existent camp for the killing of Serb children in Sisak.

[...]

Unfortunately our Croatian political scene is either powerless, or doesn't know how to answer all of these lies. A law should be passed which would state that all those who rebelled against the Republic of Croatia may not take part in any form of government; then, I think, it is necessary to request war reparations for the damage that the Republic of Serbia has caused to Croatia through its aggression, and this should be a prerequisite for any form of support for Serbia's entry into the European Union. Furthermore, it is necessary to remove the privilege for Serb children to learn a history of the Homeland War that is different than the historical truth; we should also forbid entry into Croatia to warmongers and those who spread lies - not only Serbian ministers and politicians, but also the representatives of the Serb Orthodox Church.

That is the only way a proud and victorious Croatia would act. It is the only way we could save that which we defended in the Homeland War, a war which must remain the only foundation* of modern-day Croatia. For this defense we should primarily thank the Croatian defenders, among whom we certainly include both Marko P. Thompson and academician J. Pečarić.

* {This is a very deliberate phrasing. He's implying that Croatia should give up claiming that anti-fascism as one of its foundations. By extension, he is also implying that the Ustashe movement should take its place. This subtext might not be obvious to someone who doesn't live in Croatia, but it is very clear to native people.}

Finally, I will reiterate one of the first things I said here: Oh, if only there were more people like Marko and Josip in Croatia!"

Show post
bishop Vlado Košić #fundie #conspiracy #homophobia #transphobia sibenskiportal.rtl.hr

{original article is in Croatian, translation and additional notes are by Vman. You can see the video of the speech (also in Croatian) in the middle section of the article}

September 29, 2017

Vlado Košić, the (Catholic) bishop of Sisak, led a holiday mass honoring St. Michael, the protector of the Croatian city of Šibenik. He also spoke about secular topics like the media, the Homeland War (1991-95) and the Istanbul Convention. (link was not in original text, it's given here for explanation's sake)

"These days Satan has camouflaged himself within the most influential media, which are more against Croatia than for Croatia. Indeed, look at how many untruths and half-truths they constantly frame people for, and how they accuse their brothers of having committed fictitious crimes, while the other people have almost no space in our media," said Košić.

The bishop of Sisak asked himself how to win and overcome evil in such circumstances. He claims that truth will win, and victory is God's and of his people.

"St. Michael is like a heavenly military commander who defends this nation from the Devil. It may seem as if these days we don't need him so much anymore. However, we could argue that today his protection is more necessary than ever, because modern man is increasingly losing his direction," Košić noted.

[...]

"The Istanbul Convention misleads us all because it brings gender ideology. We must decisively say 'no' to this swindle. It gives a distorted image of man and seduces the youth in order to create a new order and a society without God and moral values. The Devil wants to destroy the family because through that he aims to destroy man," said Košić.

Is it not the most normal thing that Croatia, with the greatest number of Catholics, isn't [sic] being compared to Poland, asked the bishop.

"Croatia is trying to be among the countries which dechristianized themselves, allowed same-sex unions, allowed abortion and euthanasia, legalized drugs and accepted a large number of non-Christian immigrants who are mostly unintegrated and violent towards the native people and our Christian culture. What do we want to follow, which examples? We are called upon to join in so we could take part in God's victory," bishop Košić concluded.

Show post
Manly-Chicken #ableism kiwifarms.net

image(holly: “I have not spoken out sooner because on May 9th, I checked myself into a hospital because I was having self-harming thoughts. I’m not ashamed of this at all, it was the right thing to do and I was safe there. It’s okay to ask for mental health help when you need it.)

As soon as someone plays the "mental health" card, I tune out.

It's exclusively used by awful people to excuse their shitty behavior without having to take responsibility or apologize for their actions.

Show post
Croatian attackers #racist #wingnut jutarnji.hr

{Translated by Vman, because no English-language reports of this could be found. You can see the original text (in Croatian) at the link provided in the URL below the text.
The incident happened in the Croatian city of Vukovar on the 16th of January, 2019. Vukovar has a population that is roughly 60% Croat and 35% Serb.}

YOUTH ATTENDING SERBIAN-LANGUAGE SCHOOL ATTACKED IN VUKOVAR
Multiple masked minors swooped in on him at the bus station

AUTHOR: Jutarnji.hr
PUBLISHING DATE: 17 Jan 2019, at 18:22

Wednesday evening around 7 PM in Vukovar, a student of the 3rd grade of 'Nikola Tesla' Technical School attending classes in the Serbian language was attacked at the bus station, writes the news portal Novosti.

According to unofficial sources, he was attacked by five or six minors wearing ski masks, including one without a mask. The assaulted youth identified that one; allegedly, the suspect is a student attending the same school, but in the Croatian-language program.

The non-masked minor is allegedly a member of the Bad Blue Boys football fan group. According to Novosti, he is notorious for causing trouble in the school.

"Currently I can only tell you that on Wednesday, at around 7 PM, the police were notified of five or six youths being present at the Vukovar bus station, and that they were involved in a physical altercation. The police went afield and there we came upon some of the participants of the event. However, we are still working on the case, that is, we are trying to ascertain all the circumstances. I believe that will be finished by the end of this day, so the public will be notified about everything in a communication which we should release on Friday," said Domagoj Džigmunovic, spokesman of the Vukovar-Syrmia Police Department.

The assaulted student of the Technical School sustained light injuries, and the attack occurred just two days after Vukovar mayor Ivan Penava called out the students of the Technical School who attend the Serbian language program. The reason was that they did not stand while the national anthem of the Republic of Croatia was being played at the Vukovar Cup football finals match between the NK Vuteks Sloga Vukovar and the HNK Vukovar '91 clubs. Penava further substantiated the allegation by way of a video recording where the faces of these youths are visible. According to Novosti, the video is still available at Vukovar.hr, the city's webpage.


{Vman's notes}: Public education in Vukovar is unique in that it is fully segregated according to ethnicity. Croat and Serb students attend separate classes (often in the same school building), even though the Croatian and the Serbian language are so similar as to be mutually intelligible - indeed, prior to 1991 the children were educated together.
The segregation occurred as a result of the 1990s war and the resulting fallout in inter-ethnic relations. Vukovar was the city most devastated during the war in Croatia. Serb forces besieged and shelled it for three months in 1991, and its capture was accompanied by war crimes against the captured Croatian defenders and civilians.

In the meantime, Vukovar and its wartime destruction has become a major symbol, even a sort of national myth in Croatia. Its wartime history and the interpretations of it are also a source of periodic tensions between Croatia and Serbia.

This symbol is often used and abused in Croatian politics, especially by right-wing Croat figures such as the current mayor of Vukovar, Ivan Penava. {/notes}

Show post
David J, Stewart #fundie #homophobia #transphobia #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

Queer rights, transgenderism, bisexuality, homosexual marriage, and gender transition—these are not the real battle ground. The real battle ground is against God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Church, the Holy Bible, and the Gospel. Any blasphemy against God comes from God-haters, Christ-haters, Bible-haters, Gospel-haters, and are fueled by the arch-hater, who is Satan himself! Since marriage is vital to God's design—His way to pass on order in society, sensible civilization, peace, temporal blessing and even righteousness from one generation to the next—the family has always been under assault. God made humans MALE and FEMALE (Genesis 1:27), nothing in between! After the fall of man in Genesis, we see all manner of sexual immorality in Genesis—polygamy, prostitution, incest, and rampant homosexuality by Genesis chapter 19. The true sinister agenda of demons and Satan is to DESTROY everything that God has made!!! They are the enemies of God, Christ, and the truth of Scripture, and the Gospel. Their objective is not simply to redefine gender and marriage, but to effectively destroy what God has designed!

Families provide a small sovereign unit that acts as a small barrier against the corruption that seeks to dominate. Destroy the family and the small sovereign barrier is disintegrated. The goal in all of this is not homosexual same sex marriage, but the total elimination of ALL MARRIAGE! Which then means, that you don't possess any privacy, you don't have that small sovereign unit, and your children are not yours! They're public children and they belong to the education system, and they belong to the country, and they belong to the village, but not to you! And so in Oregon your 15 year old child can have a sex-change, without parental permission, and the state will pay for it! This is not about same sex marriage, this is about the total obliteration of the family. So that there will be no more family, no more covenants, no more private sovereign units that stand up against the corruption!

Where did this all begin? It began with contraception, which allowed people to have sex without the risk of having children. This fueled the sexual revolution. But that wasn't good enough, so they legalized abortion to be more complete, eliminating all risk! So we've come all the way from sex without children, to children without sex!!! Laboratories can manufacture a baby nowadays! Two lesbians can have a baby today! A lesbian can have, planted in her womb, a living being from somebody else, manufacturing a child. This eliminates the need for a man and woman in a normal marriage. So we've deteriorated from sex without having children, to the insanity of having children without sex! They can just make them, so who needs a family? Right? It's going to get worse and worse and worse! Same sex, polygamy, anything to destroy the family!!! Just as Sodom tried to rape the angels sent from Heaven, who appeared in human form in Genesis, so also do queers today rape all that is pure, holy and chaste! HOMOSEXUALITY IS OF THE DEVIL!!!

Show post
Andrea Hardie AKA Janet Bloomfield AKA JudgyBitch #racist #wingnut #psycho archive.is

Yes, I’m a Nazi. And how are you?

I’m the daughter of a Lebensborn. Grand-daughter of an SS Officer. I’m Aryan by culture and by blood. The word “Nazi” is getting thrown around quite a lot lately, and I think it’s time we settled on a definition. I’m rather offended by the broadening of who gets to call themselves a Nazi.

Quite frankly, I’m sick of the cultural appropriation.

Nazi is a short form way of saying National Socialist, but most current Nazis realize that socialism is completely bonkers and the reason Hitler lost. Had he been a proper capitalist, he would not have had such supply chain management issues and his Army would have survived that disastrous winter on the Russian front. Stalingrad would have fallen. Socialists can’t do anything right. Also, the Russians were willing to eat each other. We Nazis might have a well-deserved reputation for savagery, but even we have standards.

Simply sharing the political ideology of socialism is not a sufficient condition for calling anyone a Nazi. The world is filled with wingnut socialists like Bernie Sanders and Mitt Romney and they can’t all be Nazis. That is too broad a brush.

Being a Nazi, much like being a Muslim, is far more than just a set of ideas about how to structure society. It’s ultimately about annihilation. The complete and utter destruction of the weak, the inferior, the non-believers. There is a profound science based on biological fact that underwrites real Nazism. Yes, your eye color matters. Yes, the shade of your hair matters. Your height matters. Your weight matters. This is not based on some sort of preference derived purely from aesthetics. That’s nonsense. It is settled science that height and weight and the amount of melanin in your body is correlated with intelligence, accomplishment, leadership ability and just general superiority.

Tall, fit blondes are better than everyone else.

Sorry. Not liking that fact does not alter the truth value. You only need to see Wilm Hosenfeld standing next to the starving Jew pianist to see clearly the pre-eminence of Nazi blood.

Nazi is a synonym for physical superiority. Genetic superiority. The promise of what humanity can become. Low IQ Trump voters clearly do not qualify, on body weight alone. Real Nazis have an intrinsic pride that renounces thuggery and street violence. If we are going to eradicate deplorables, we do so with elegance and efficacy. Nazis are still Germans, after all.

There is much talk about resisting Nazis by punching them.

This is a grave mistake. Nazis don’t punch back. They exterminate. Be careful what you wish for. Be careful you do not give rise to what you are protesting. I’m happy with a police state. I have no fear. I have no need to fear the authority.

I am the authority.

And I do not fear making difficult, fraught decisions. Strength, after all, lies in attack, not defense. I am the daughter of a Lebensborn. I have blonde hair and blue eyes and I have borne three children who also have blonde hair and blue eyes. I am the future. I claim my place by declaring proudly that I am a Nazi.

The future has no room for gay Jews who may be charming and silly and great fun, but who will never father beautiful Aryan children.

Let’s be more precise about how we use the term Nazi. It would be such a shame if the word were to be used so irreverently and casually that it lost all meaning.

That’s just not reich.

Lots of love,

JB

Show post
Oboehner #fundie #wingnut disqus.com

(Commenting on story "NYC De Blasio Admin Staffer, Young Democrats President Arrested for Possession of over 3000 Child Porn Files":)

Oboehner:
Notice the complete lack of leftist trolls on stories such as this?

Sisyphus:
You are expecting someone to attempt to defend his repulsive behavior? Violent career criminals love to get a new pedophile as a new prison guest. Not sure how my radical left politics precludes me from thinking prison is where he belongs.

Oboehner:
What, no "born that way" nonsense?

Sisyphus:
Even if he was "born that way" if his sickness compels him to abuse and exploit others, he needs to be kept away from society. Maybe banished to a remote island.

Oboehner:
Gays exploit each other but that's fine by you.

James Blue:
What do gays have to do with this?

Oboehner:
If you need an explanation, you may wish to troll elsewhere.

Show post
Oboehner #fundie #wingnut christiannews.net

Ambulance Chaser:
I don't think you get this. Although I believe there are constitutional grounds for judicial review, and we've been over it already, that's not the point.

I'm not interested in debating whether or not there SHOULD be judicial review. That's above my pay grade.

All I know is that there is, it's an indisputable fact, and it's the basis of American law. I simply don't care to debate the esoteric nuances of early constitutional history. That's for professors and historians to duke it out. I practice law, I don't write or theorize about it.

Oboehner:
You can believe the moon is made of green cheese too if you want, doesn't make it any more factual.
Consider this, how can we have government by the people for the people if some judge can insert his/her opinion as law with no recourse? What would make the Supreme Court any different than the Communist Party in China? I see no difference other than the illusion of freedom with representation if courts can make binding (law) decisions.

Ambulance Chaser:
Again, you fail to listen. I'm not arguing what SHOULD BE. I'm telling you how it works.

I know you don't like it. You've made that abundantly clear. It doesn't matter. Your dislike for the system won't change it.

Oboehner:
Could have fooled me.
There are many things wrong with this country, that is just a fine example. What is even more disturbing is that the masses are completely ignorant, even defending the wrongs (even as far as flagging my posts for whatever reason).

Ambulance Chaser:
Yes, as we've gone over before: every lawyer, judge, law professor, elected official and civil servant in America is wrong about how judicial review works. Only you are correct.

Makes perfect sense.

Oboehner:
Resorting to that now? Sad. When you have the inmates running the asylum, what do you expect?

Ambulance Chaser:
Here's the long and the short of it. There are two questions here. One is whether the courts HAVE judicial review powers and the other is whether the SHOULD HAVE judicial review powers.

To the first question, yes, obviously they do. That's not disputable. It would be like denying that the sky is blue.

To the second question, I think they should but simply don't care enough about it to argue. It doesn't interest me, has no real-world implications, and I simply can't be bothered to argue it.

Oboehner:
The question is whether that "power" is legal or not, it is not and that is not disputable.

"has no real-world implications" Usurping power and violating the Constitution has no real-world implications? There's one.

"I simply can't be bothered to argue it." I suppose that's as good a cop out as any.

Ambulance Chaser:
"The question is whether that "power" is legal or not, it is not and that is not disputable"

Of course it is. I've told you that Article 3 Sec 2 gives the courts the power of judicial review. There, I disputed it. However, I'm not going to debate this any further because it's a pointless argument

"Usurping power and violating the Constitution has no real-world implications? There's one"

No, debating whether that happened or not had no real-world implications because we can't change anything even if it did (which I'm not conceding).

Oboehner:
(Posts the entirety of Art. 3, Sec. 2)
Not seeing the striking down of laws anywhere in there, guess you were wrong, and the courts are acting illegally. But we can't change that so we'll just have to bend over, right?

Ambulance Chaser:
We've already been over this, and I said I was done with this stupid argument, so I'm not going to do it again. We obviously have differing views on this.

The only difference is that mine is the view held consistently by the entire legal system for 200 years, but by all means, don't let that stand in your way.

Oboehner:
We obviously do have differing views, mine is constitutional, and yours is based on an out of control judiciary.
But by all means let popular opinion and tradition rule over what's right. Viva oligarchy!!

Show post
Oboehner #fundie christiannews.net

Oboehner:
Again with the single case court opinions as if they are relevant to others beside the ones in that case, hmmm...

Ambulance Chaser:
That's because they are, and your obstinate refusal to accept that reality does nothing to change it.

Citing case law is LITERALLY Day 1 material in law school. Citing cases is just about as natural to a lawyer as breathing. Any lawyer who doesn't cite cases regularly and abundantly is simply not practicing law.

The position you take is not just wrong, it's fractally wrong. It demonstrates not just an ignorance of the law in this case, but an ignorance of even the most fundamental basics of how law operates.

To attempt to put this into some kind of perspective, your position is the equivalent of playing Tetris and announcing that you're the winner because you got to the top of the screen faster than anyone else. Or thinking you won a round of golf because you got the highest score.

TheLastHonestLawyer:
And to build on what Ambulance Chaser said, I was taught to look for the cases that contained numerous case citations themselves. You look for the most recent, most supported decision to bolster your case.

Oboehner:
Let's see, reality...

Article I: Legislative
Section 1 -
"ALL legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the
United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of
Representatives."

"Citing case law is LITERALLY Day 1 material in law school." Can you say the inmates are running the asylum?
Do explain how non-law is binding though, I'm all a-twitter with anticipation!

TheLastHonestLawyer:
OK, I'll use small words.

Courts do not make law.

Courts examine the law.

They use the Constitution to examine laws.

The Constitution is the highest law in our nation.

This includes the Amendments.

Laws cannot violate the Constitution.

If the judge(s) find the law violates the Constitution, they issue a ruling.

That ruling says the law cannot be enforced.

It does not remove the law from the state laws.

It just neuters it.

States can appeal this decision.

But once SCOTUS has made a decision (or refused to hear the case) it is over. The last appellate ruling stands.

So, what can the state do?

They can try to rewrite the law to address what the courts found unconstitutional.

They can push for a Constitutional Amendment.

Or they can accept that they lost and move on.

This, by the way, is the reason Roy Moore lost his seat on the Alabama Supreme Court. SCOTUS ruled that laws banning same-sex marriage were in violation of the 14th Amendment. Moore tried to order county clerks to ignore the order. His own state's review board kicked him out of office for that.

Oboehner:
OK, I'll use small words too.
Only laws are binding, court cases are not either.
Courts gave themselves the power to examine laws.
The courts examining laws is not in the Constitution.
The Constitution is the highest law in our nation.
This includes the Amendments (the Tenth as well).
Laws cannot violate the Constitution.
If the judge(s) find the law violates the Constitution, they issue a ruling, which is as pretty as Billy's kindergarten drawing on the fridge.
That ruling says the law cannot be enforced, but they have no constitutional power to say that.
The ruling is the only thing neutered.
States don't have to appeal this decision as it is unconstitutional.
But once SCOTUS has made a decision (or refused to hear the case) it is over. The last appellate ruling stands ONLY over the single case that came from a lower court.

TheKingOfRhye:
"The last appellate ruling stands ONLY over the single case that came from a lower court."

That line of thinking makes no sense to me. When the Supreme Court rules, in an appeal that is brought before them, that a law is unconstitutional, how can it only apply in a single case then? The 14th Amendment gives equal protection of the law (the existing laws, not the laws you say they supposedly create) to all citizens.

Oboehner:
And?

TheKingOfRhye
And when the court rules the law applies in a certain way in one case, because of the 14th, it applies that way to everyone else.

Oh, and judicial review is in the Constitution.

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

In other words, unconstitutional laws don't apply. And if you're going to tell me next that it isn't the court's job to interpret laws...well, I'm no legal expert, but I don't understand how a court system could exist without doing that. If nothing else, they have to deal with old laws, and interpret how they would apply to situations that the people who made them would have never imagined.

Oboehner:
"And when the court rules the law applies in a certain way in one case" is ONLY relevant to that case as anything else would be a usurpation of power and unconstitutional - rendering the rest of your argument null and void. In other words, unconstitutional laws or actions don't apply.

Show post
Grace Mugabe #fundie ewn.co.za

If you walk around wearing miniskirts displaying your thighs and inviting men to drool over you, then you want to complain when you have been raped? It’s unfortunate because it will be your fault.

Show post
Russell Moore #fundie erlc.com

Speak directly to these people. To the woman who has had the abortion. To the man who has paid for an abortion. To the health care worker who has profited off of tearing apart the bodies of the young and the consciences of their parents.

Speak clearly of the horror of judgement to come. Confirm what every accusing conscience already knows: clinic privacy laws cannot keep all this from being exposed at the tribunal of Christ. When the Light shines, there’s not enough darkness in which to hide and cringe.

But don’t stop there.

Proclaim just as openly that judgment has fallen on the quivering body of a crucified Jesus—accused by Satan, indicted by the Law, enveloped by the curse.

An abortion culture knows that hell exists, and they know judgment waits (Rom 2:14-16). Agree with them, but point them to the truth that God is not simply willing to forgive them. Show them how in Christ God is both just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus (Rom 3:26).

[...]

The consciences around us don’t believe what they’re telling themselves. They’re scared and accused. Shine the light in the eyes of their consciences. Prophetically. All for justice, legally and culturally, for the unborn. But don’t stop there.

After all, the spirit of murder doesn’t start or end in the abortion clinic (Matt. 5:21, 15:19; Jn. 8:44; Acts 9:1; Rom. 1:29; Jn. 3:15). And the blood of Christ has cleansed the consciences of rebels like all of us.

Show post
John Eidsmoe #racist christiannewswire.com

As Christians, we recognize that the Bible commands us to be kind to ‘the sojourner within our gates.’ But this assumes the ‘sojourner’ is here legally and is not a threat to innocent Americans.

Show post
Ann Barnhardt #fundie barnhardt.biz

1. The March ARSH 2015 Holy Sacrifice of the Mass offered for my Benefactors will be on March 19th, which is the Feast of St. Joseph! I thought it most fitting, considering the Novena we all did together last month to St. Joseph. He did indeed find me a new parking spot for the Van, and while more expensive in absolute terms, it is an excellent value, and much closer to my job where I Clean All the Things. I won’t miss the commute, such as it was.

I hope all is going well for youse guys, both supporters and enemies. I pray for you every day, specifically that you make it to heaven, because in the end, that is really all that is going to matter. The interim details I leave to God.

2. Many people have asked about specific courses of action. Let me re-post my list of action items:

1.) Media strike
2.) Education system strike (or, put another way, not engaging in child abuse by sending your kids to Marxist-Sodomite indoctrination centers.)
3.) Financial market strike
4.) Tax strike (Max out withholding (if not self-employed) and then don’t file. DO NOT file a false return.)
5.) General strike
6.) Armed counter-revolution

Failure to engage in options one through five GUARANTEES the necessity of number six. Sadly, that is where we are going.

3. Of course, prayer and fasting are antecedents to the six points above. Inspired by the tremendous number of folks who joined in my St. Joseph Novena last month, I have put together a special Rosary – the Sorrowful Mysteries – in Latin, for the “Crushing of and in Reparation for the Heresy of Modernism”, which I have been saying daily for a while now. Modernism is the “synthesis of all heresies” as Pope St. Pius X called it, and it pretty much covers everything. Pope Francis and all of the infiltrators of the Church are Modernists.

Show post
Uncle Jeebers #conspiracy banjohollow.wordpress.com

Judith Reisman’s role is to exhonerate jews, who in fact control the porn industry and could make it stop today if they wanted – and who run the world’s largest pedophilia network, an official list of mohels who humiliate, exploit and sexually torture jewish baby boys. This list functions for practically every city in the whole world. The jewish role in porn and pedophilia is the most important aspect of this issue today, i.e., to make any gains against it means to punish jews who are directly organized around the concept of being jewish. IF it were possible to stop circumcision among jews, it would immediately provide relief to jewish boys, and furthermore cause a dramatic reduction of sexual perversions later on in life which are a direct result of the genital mutilation experience.
steve hirsch, high criminal, mafia boss

Jews such as Steve Hirsch are free to resign their positions as porn masters, and thus free themselves of the responsibility of putting millions of women and children into sex slavery around the world (the films only being an offshoot). HOWEVER, since they are in control of it, they should either order it to stop or resign control. Whoever takes control of a situation has responsibility for the resulting outcome.

This criticism is a public service message provided free of charge from the Knights of Banjo Hollow. What we represent at the KBH is constructive criticism, justice and honor. If anyone among us has a problem, we provide positive assistance. Concerning society, we must as the fundamental principle of ahimsa and brother’s keeper dictates, uphold justice. In order to reduce suffering of all souls in the world, there must be a general order of justice. Dangerous criminals must suffer temporarily in a world with justice. The suffering and punishment we inflict as agents of justice against them will hopefully instruct them and in their next lives their criminality will be reduced, just as the suffering of victims.

What Judith Reisman is doing is to divert blame and attempt to render powerless any possible agent of justice against the organized crime of porn. Furthermore, she goes on to blame agents who have little or nothing to do with porn – Nazis. As Nazis (now an unofficial party in Germany) have no known members having any known role in the porn industry, blaming Nazis would, in a court case, cause no one to be punished and no victims to be freed. Thus, Reisman herself is a criminal and actively working with the jewish mafia to protect the evil that is porn.

– Uncle Jeebers

Show post
Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

Silas Jennings:
“Science has been proving the Bible correct for decades”
Source please? We know Noah’s flood was impossible, that snakes cannot talk and let’s not get started about Jonah...

Amos Moses:
back at cha ..... Source please? .......

Silas Jennings:
You shouldn't need one unless you possess the answer about how those two penguins walked all the way from Antarctica, but this is a good starting place:
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_flood

Amos Moses:
penguins can SWIM .... next ........ and FYI ..... there were more than 2 ......

Silas Jennings:
I see. And the kangaroos hopped?

Amos Moses:
kangaroos can also swim ...... need the video? ...... and you are making assumptions NOT based in science and on YOUR desire to believe what you want to believe .......... FAIL ............

Silas Jennings:
The video of two kangaroos taking a little transcontinental swim? Yes please. And penguins too if you don’t mind.
Do take your time. I think you’re going to be a while.

Amos Moses:
AGAIN .... you are making ASSUMPTIONS not based on any facts .... just what you want to believe .... you have no evidence it was a "transcontinental swim" ..... and penguins spend MONTHS at sea except for when they lay eggs and hatch ..... so "long swims" .... EASY .....

Show post
Mark Jones #fundie theologyreview.co.uk

Over the weekend I was involved in a conversation revolving around the release of The Nashville Statement (you can read the article on that here). Due to the subject nature of the statement, the conversation got pretty heated. And unfortunately, some shots were fired in my direction. This conversation reminded me greatly of the importance of standing firm upon God’s word, hence the title of this article.

The intent of this article is to in no way show the shots that were thrown my way for what they were. But to encourage the readers of this site to stand firm on God’s word, even if that makes us unpopular and sometimes even hated. A grim reality of the times we’re living in is that if we as Christians do not acquiesce to the opinions of those who sit on the more liberal side of the fence, we will be loathed. We will be told that we are not “loving” or are “taking scripture out of context”, two things that I was accused of with no evidence (I requested a defence of these accusations that was based in scripture, and they never came). It is an unfortunate reality, but it is one that we must be prepared to face.

We were warned about this by the Apostle Paul in his second letter to Timothy, particularly in 2 Timothy 4:3-4. Yet just one verse later in 2 Timothy 4:5 we are reminded of the importance of standing firm upon God’s word. It is this encouragement that I want to use for the core of this article.

But first, let me offer up some context for the reason for writing this article.

Why I Am Writing This Article

As already stated, this article comes out of a discussion I was involved in over the weekend on Facebook in relation to the release of The Nashville Statement. A discussion that became unnecessarily heated.

I won’t go into too much detail on the conversation as I don’t think that is fair to the people involved. But what I will say is that I got involved in this discussion by adding in a Biblically accurate defence for the understanding that both Jesus and Paul did address the issue of homosexuality during their ministries.

I met some very harsh opposition from two people in particular, due to the fact that I was willing to stand firm on God’s word, unlike them who wanted a more “loving” response, meaning a response compromising my integrity as a Christian. At one point I was told that I should not be pursuing full-time ministry due to not affirming the LGBT choice of lifestyle. Needless to say, I found this rather hurtful and unnecessary, whilst at the same time being fairly comical. The conversation was ended when I was blocked on Facebook by the original poster after they accused me of being unbiblical and ungodly. For both of these strong accusations, a defence was requested, one was never made.

This altercation really reminded me of the urgent need to commit to doing some solid Biblical teaching on subjects like this. This is because the unfortunate reality seems to be that without this said solid Biblical teaching, many people will start to conform to the patterns of this world, something we’re warned not to do in Romans 12:2.

It is this desire to bring in some solid Biblical teaching on the subject that I want to use as the basis for the remainder of the article.

How Can We Stand Firm Upon God’s Word Today?

Now just to offer a bit of a preamble to this section here. I subscribe to what we would call reformed theology. In a nutshell, reformed theology has a high view of both God and scripture. Believing in the sovereignty of God, the authority of scripture, and salvation by grace alone. If you want a bit more information on reformed theology, Got Questions have put together a good introduction to it on their website. So some people may call be a fundamentalist (I was in the altercation), but I’m OK with that. Because I believe in the fundamental truths of scripture. Plus between you and me, if you ever get called a fundamentalist or a “fundie”, it’s always a dig from people who compromise on scripture for the sake of their opinion. But let’s get back to the question at hand.

How can we stand firm upon God’s word today? The answer to this is relatively simple actually, it’s the outworking of that answer that can get complicated. We stand firm upon God’s word today by refusing to compromise to the truths that God has revealed to us in scripture. So that’s the simple part.

The complicated part is the outworking of this.See, it’s all too easy to consider compromising scripture. Let’s take the example of you having a gay friend (it’s an appropriate example considering the reason for writing this article), many people would feel it’s more “loving” or more “Christ-like” to affirm their lifestyle.

See, it’s all too easy to consider compromising scripture. Let’s take the example of you having a gay friend (it’s an appropriate example considering the reason for writing this article), many people would feel it’s more “loving” or more “Christ-like” to affirm their lifestyle. The issue with this is that the Bible clearly defines this lifestyle as sinful, and Jesus gives clear instruction that once someone is forgiven, that they are to go and sin no more (John 8:11). However, unfortunately, pop culture has decided that our identity as a person is found in our sexuality, whereas as Christians our identity should be found in Christ (Galatians 2:20).

We have to always remember that Jesus is at the very core of what we do. It is upon the acceptance of Jesus Christ as Lord and His resurrection from the dead by God that we receive true salvation (Romans 10:9). And it is the on the revelation that Jesus is the Messiah in which He has decided to build His Church, we see Peter confirm Jesus as Messiah in Matthew 16:16 and Jesus’ statement that this is the grounding of the Church in Matthew 16:18. So it is Jesus Christ who is at the center of the Church, not man, and we must always be mindful of that.

We must also remember that God has breathed out His word, He has inspired it, and therefore it is inclusive of the authority of God, we see this in 2 Timothy 3:16-17. This is not to say that the Bible is higher in authority than God, but it is on the same level, as the Bible is the chosen tool of God that He reveals His will and direction for our lives through. So as Christians we should never put the Bible to the side. Neither should we come up with silly arguments such as we should focus on Jesus’ teachings, despite the fact that Jesus’ teachings are all found in the Bible.

A conscious decision must be made by us as believers to follow the instruction that Christ has laid out for us in His word. We are told in Psalm 119:89 that His word is settled forever in heaven. This means that we have no right to change the doctrine that Christ has laid out for us through His word, no right to change it at all. We need to decide to fall in line with scripture, whether we agree with it or not. God is the final authority here, not us.

I cannot stress that last point enough, God is the final authority here, not us.

So the question then becomes, if God is the final authority, not us, how does that affect how we should interpreate scripture? That is a question for our next article.

A Closing Encouragement

Before we close I wanted to give a brief encouragement to those who desire to stay true to scripture. At times doing this can be very difficult, sometimes we’ll face opposition from Christians who think they’re doing right by God and others. What we need to remember is that Jesus has told us that if we truly love Him, then we are to keep His commands (John 14:15, John 14:23). God’s desire for us is to ultimately give Him all the glory, and we do this by honouring what He has commanded us to do in His word … the Bible.

So if you encounter hostility in doing this, remember that Jesus met this same hostility, and take comfort in the fact that we have already been forewarned that this would happen.

In this encounter over the week, the original poster mentioned that I should be forgiven because I didn’t know what I was doing (lots of Biblically inaccurate overtones there). However, I did know what I was doing, and it was standing firm upon God’s word. It will always be my intention to do this, I hope you will share in that with me.

Show post
Zachary K Hubbard #conspiracy freetofindtruth.blogspot.ca

Alex Jones, Waco and Controlled Opposition- “Man of Prophecy”

Following this theme of ‘forty-two’ and Waco, let us also take a moment to expose the truth about Alex Jones, who is controlled opposition, and who started his brand of journalism after the events of Waco and Oklahoma City in 1995. For the record, controlled opposition means a person or source that shares some truth with their audience, while at the same time gatekeeping greater truths that are to remain secret. In the case of Alex Jones, his main purpose is to sell fear while promoting merchandise that ties in with the false fear threats. He will occasionally also mislead his audience by demonizing important theories such as “no planes” hit the World Trade Centers. If you have never heard Alex Jones cuss out the people who share this very logical argument, please investigate it. The way he approaches the subject is very harmful and abrasive.

Those points aside, let’s decode Alex Jones, the man who supposedly turned forty-two years old, February 11, the forty-second day of the year, 2015. As most people I know say, Alex looks about a decade older than that. We’ll begin with his name and date of birth.

Alexander = 1+3+5+6+1+5+4+5+9 = 39 (Alex = 1+3+5+6 = 15)
Emerick = 5+4+5+9+9+3+2/11 = 37/46
Jones = 1+6+5+5+1/10 = 18/27
Alexander Emerick Jones = 94/103/112 (Born 11/2, February 11) (911 alt)
Alex Jones = 33/42

Notice the gematria of thirty-three and forty-two. The thirty-three ties in with him broadcasting on the ‘Genesis’ Communication Network, which he is the flagship program of. Alex Jones began his radio career in ’96, the number connected to ‘forty-two’ through Freemason and its divisors. He would join with “GCN” in 1998.

Genesis = 7+5+5+5+1/10+9+1/10 = 33/51

Also notice how Genesis is the first of thirty-nine Books in the Old Testament. His birth name Alexander, has gematria of thirty-nine. The Book of Revelation, the book of Prophecy, is based on the thirty-nine books of the Old Testament. Again, the Genesis Communication Network launched in 1998. There are two numbers connected to ‘prophecy’ largely in gematria. They are ‘ninety-eight’ and ‘one-hundred-six’.

Prophet = 16+18+15+16+8+5+20 = 98
Prophecy = 16+18+15+16+8+5+3+25 = 106

I bring up this point, because Alex Jones has birth numerology of 106 and his radio program launched in ’98. He has been preaching apocalypse, much in line with the Book of Revelation, for most of that time since.

2/11/1974 = 2+11+19+74 = 106

The use of the word ‘Network’, as in ‘Genesis Radio Network’, might even factor into the whole pre-planned, manmade prophecy angle.

Network = 14+5+20+23+15+18+11 = 106

Below we will see Alex Jones also has name gematria of 211, the 47th prime number. In the year 1947, on the 333rd day of the year, November 29, 1947, a date with ‘106’ numerology, Israel was first recognized as a nation by a thirty-three-member vote coming from the United Nations. The nation had been drawn up just months earlier, September 3, 1947, and the agreement to give Israel statehood had been reached twelve weeks and three-days later. It is remembered as a date of ‘prophecy’ in Jewish culture, “returning to the promised land”.

11/29/1947 = 11+29+19+47 = 106 (Prophecy)
11/29/1947 = 11+29+(1+9+4+7+) = 61 (God, Jewish Gematria)
11/29/1947 = 1+1+2+9+1+9+4+7 = 34 (One)
11/29/47 = 11+29+47 = 87

The year ’47 cannot be overlooked either, nor that it was the 333rd day of the year. Notice the numerology of each values of the date; X / X/ X; 11 / 29 / 47.

11 = 11; 29 = 2+9 = 11; 47 = 4+7 = 11; 11/29/47 = 11/11/11 = 33

From the date the nation was drawn up, September 3, to the date of it being approved by thirty-three votes, was eighty-seven days later, matching the eighty-seven date numerology of November 29, 1947. Words such as ‘truth’ and ‘justice’ have gematria of ‘eighty-seven’, but one must ask, whose truth? Whose justice?

Truth = 20+18+21+20+8 = 87
Justice = 10+21+19+20+9+3+5 = 87

The clues point to those who worship Saturn and the occult, the date of September 3, is very much like the numbers thirty-nine and ninety-three. Recall how ‘ninety-three’ connects to ‘Saturn’, the keeper of time, and ‘time’ shares gematria of ‘forty-seven’. Here we are talking about September 3 in the year ’47, and the creation of Israel, a new nation, a prophetic nation. Following the theme, Israel’s equivalent of the U.S. Congress is known as ‘Knesset’.

Knesset = 2/11+5+5+1/10+1/10+5+2 = 21/30/39/48
Knesset = 11+14+5+19+19+5+20 = 93

This goes back to the thirty-nine signers of the Declaration of Independence and more. If you are not aware, the logo of the United States, the map of the flat earth, is divided into thirty-three spaces. Think about how in New York, the United Nations is thirty-nine floors tall.

York = 7+6+9+2/11 = 24/33

Regarding Alex Jones, he has a ‘ninety-three’ connection through his birth as well, being born in Dallas, TX, in the year ‘1974’. Keep in mind the word ‘propaganda’ has gematria of ‘ninety-three’, and Alex Jones spews a lot of it.

Dallas = 4+1+12+12+1+19 = 49 (Revelation); TX = 20+24 = 44 (Clock)
Dallas, TX = 93 (Propaganda) (Saturn)
1974 = 19+74 = 93

As we covered, Alex Jones full birth name gematria summed to ‘112’, much like his February 11, or 11/2 birthday. His program greatly grew after September 11, 2001. This is interesting in light of 1-1-2 being the alternate dialing code for 9-1-1. In almost all fifty-states, if you dial 1-1-2, you will be connected to 9-1-1. 1-1-2 is the emergency dialing code in many international countries, especially those that are European. Interestingly enough, from September 11 to January 12 (1/12) is 123-days later, and from September 11 to February 11 (11/2) is 153-days later, the number often paired with ‘forty-two’, and again, February 11 is the forty-second day of the year.

Now on with the decoding of his birth name, this time in Simple English Gematria.

Alexander = 1+12+5+24+1+14+4+5+18 = 84 (Alex = 1+12+5+24 = 42)
Emerick = 5+13+5+18+9+3+11 = 64
Jones = 10+15+14+5+19 = 63
Alexander Emerick Jones = 211 (47th prime number) *Born on 2/11
Alex Jones = 105 (Zionism) (Masonry)

Notice that his full birth name sums to 211, which is the forty-seventh prime number. Again, Alex Jones was born in the year 1974, emphasis on ’74, the reflection of forty-seven, the numbers with the special duality as we covered in the introduction. Also, recall how that number relates to ‘Masonic’ and ‘Jewish’. Alex Jones is essentially a front man for these same masonic entities who rule over us. He is here to trick and appease a part of the population, which he does, daily, by the millions. If only his audience knew the truth of what he was really doing. Taking advantage I say! Shameful I say!

The eighty-four in Alexander pops out as well. As you might recall, ‘United States of America’ sums to eighty-four, reminding me always of the Orwell novel. The main character in 1984 is ‘Winston’.

Winston = 5+9+5+1+2+6+5 = 33/42

Did you notice Alex summed to ‘forty-two’? If you have never read the novel, I’ll ruin the ending for you. Or, you can just skip to the next paragraph. In the end, the guy you thought was on your side, Winston, well he’s not anymore. They got him too. Kind of like those who put their faith in “AJ”. Alex Jones's show is known as 'InfoWars', continuing the theme of ‘forty-two’.

InfoWars = 9+5+6+6+5+1+9+1 = 42/51
InfoWars = 9+14+6+15+23+1+18+19 = 105

Notice the gematria of ‘105’. Alex Jones has a bumper sticker and slogan he has sold for a number of years, ‘End the Fed’. It is interesting that traditionally, the Federal Reserve requires all tax payments to be due for the past year April 15, the 105th day of the year, and the 106th day in leap years.

Let us examine the gematria of the phrases ‘End the Fed’ and ‘Arrest the Banksters’, they’re quite fascinating. ‘End the Fed’ is a perfect match with ‘Federal Reserve’ and ‘Arrest the Banksters’ is identical with ‘The Synagogue of Satan’ and ‘Masonic’.

End the Fed = 5+14+4+20+8+5+6+5+4 = 71

Federal = 6+5+4+5+9+1+3 = 33
Reserve = 9+5+1+5+9+4+5 = 38
Federal Reserve = 71

Recall the ‘223’ gematria of ‘masonic’ and ‘The Synagogue of Satan’, the reflection of ‘322’, the number affiliated with the masonic order ‘Skull and Bones’.

Arrest = 1+18+18+5+19+20 = 81
The = 20+8+5 = 33
Banksters = 2+1+14+11+19+20+5+18+19 = 109
Arrest the Banksters = 223 (Masonic) (The Synagogue of Satan)

It is a mocking, in numbers! From Alex Jones, to the details of these made for TV propaganda events, they’re all a satire of the masses. On one hand you have a loud-mouthed fear mongering Christian who is preaching apocalypse, on the other you have stories with absurd details that are hardly believable in their presentation. Two teens who place enough bombs to takeout Denver, a man with a U-Haul who causes half of a city block to disappear in Oklahoma City and David Koresh, the last prophet? Who is buying it? Hopefully not you truth seeker!

Show post
Lance Wallnau #fundie rightwingwatch.org

On Tuesday, conservative pastor Lance Wallnau appeared on “The Jim Bakker Show” to discuss President Trump’s inauguration and the Women’s March on Washington.

Wallnau said he knows the real reason that millions of people marched against the new president the day after the inauguration: Upon taking office, Trump evicted an evil spirit of witchcraft from the White House, causing that demonic spirit to go out into the general population.

“What I believe is happening is there was a deliverance of the nation from the spirit of witchcraft in the Oval Office,” he said. “The spirit of witchcraft was in the Oval Office, it was about to intensify to a higher level demon principality, and God came along with a wrecking ball [Trump] and shocked everyone, the church cried out for mercy and bam—God knocked that spirit out, and what you’re looking at is the manifestation of an enraged demon through the spirit.”


If Trump had lost the election, Bakker said, America would have seen “a destruction, a total end of the church.”

Show post
sjfrellc #sexist google.no

I’m not bitter, not a misogynist, not a threat to others (except when I want to be) and have improved myself as a self respecting masculine male with red pill awareness and game actions. I’m ten times the husband over the last two years and a much better father. I love and support my wife and children without regret. That could change tomorrow, but for now it holds as self evident to me, (Ego-Investment or not). In short I’m not evil now, where I could have been bitter and malevolent 5 years ago until I gained red pill awareness out of evo-psych principles. I’m feeling great this week.
And I think (in my INTJ brain) that you have to be ignorant, dumb, stupid or lazy to not see evo-psych proven premises as not actually being self evident and observing behavior for 50 years. Or reading a book or two (or hundreds).

Show post
Cindy Jacobs #fundie generals.org

In prayer, we came to understand that the Lion's Market was actually the insertion of biblical economics into the financial system of the nation. It has been prophesied that modern-day Josephs will arise and take their place in society to implement God’s plans, reforming the nation back to a biblical worldview and fulfilling the part of the Great Commission that calls us to make disciples of nations. (You can read more about this in my book, Reformation Manifesto.)

We also realized that, through prayer, we needed to "uproot" laws put in place that would restrict the growth of a free-market economy and pray that God's modern-day Daniels would field new legislation to reform laws.

Additionally, with the new world of lightning-speed buying and selling, we prayed against what is known as a "flash crash"—a rapid, deep fall in security prices over an extremely short time period. We also asked God to expose corruption in these kind of transactions and any other transactions being made in the worldwide financial systems.

These represent the broad-brush picture of our strategies, although by no means includes them all. As in 2008, we would wait to see what would transpire as we made prayer journeys later in the day to the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Hall, the NYSE, and the statue of the bull right up the street (or, as some have called it, the golden calf because people from around the world rub its horns for luck. It is called guerrilla art as it was not commissioned by Wall Street, but just "appeared" there one night.).

At the stock exchange, we were given a tour and were delighted to meet some fellow believers who pray together for the exchange and for each other. This was greatly encouraging to us.

We met at the bull and prayed for the Lion's Market to emerge with biblical economics and the transfer of wealth. We also prayed that God would shake the market in a way that would bring a course correction and avert another Great Depression for the future.

As always, we are grateful for the mercies of God.

We had a prayer meeting at Federal Hall, where George Washington was inaugurated and our first congress met 226 years before. The hall is an impressive structure, catty-cornered to the NYSE. Earlier that day, musicians in colonial garb played the fife and drum, and an actor dressed as George Washington read his inaugural address that evoked Almighty God.

As we gathered to pray and commemorate Washington’s historical inauguration, we had a deep sense that we stood on the shoulders of giants as we cried out for freedom of religion to remain in the land. Our forefathers paid for such freedom with their blood and hammered our Bill of Rights together with iron-clad, irrevocable declarations that now seem in danger of being done away with in our time.

We made our Appeal to Heaven with the flag that George Washington had hung from the Navy ships—those same words emblazoned across the top. We humbled ourselves and cried for a return to the covenants our forefathers made, and we invoked the name of the great Peacemaker for our nation that is seeing rioting in the streets from the pain of racism. We felt the weight of knowing our society has turned from the loving Hand of God who had made us a great people, and we believe that His powerful presence will once again shake our nation with another Great Awakening from sea to shining sea.

Show post
Tim and Bill Jackson #fundie rawstory.com

Two brothers who support President Donald Trump argued over the weekend that the president was right to place a ban on travel from seven majority-Muslim countries because Jesus Christ is “the reason this country is here and safe today.”

In an interview with NPR that was published on Sunday, brothers Tim and Bill Jackson of Elizabethtown, New York called on Americans to give the president a chance.

“You know, I mean, everybody [is saying] he’s signed this, he’s signed that,” Tim opined. “It’s only been a week.”

“I’m sick of people who just stand by,” brother Bill agreed. “Now that someone’s gone in there and stirred the waters up, boy them Democrats are pissed. They’re trying to come up with every way they can to push him down.”

The brothers also linked Trump’s travel ban directly to Christianity.

“I feel that if a Muslim woman wants to move into this country, she needs to leave her towel home,” Bill explained. “Because the reason this country is here and safe today is because of Jesus Christ.”

He continued: “We were one nation under God. The Muslims are into Allah. They can’t live there [in their home countries] anymore because of all the turmoil and unrest. Here we still have somewhat peace. So if you’re going to come here to enjoy this peace, follow our rules and be one nation under God. Or stay home. I’m not making you change your religion, or whatever you want to call it, your belief. But if you want this, what we want, then you got to do what we’re doing to get it.”

Bill also disagreed with the notion that the Constitution gives Americans the right to worship the god of their choice.

“That is something I believe that has come along with political correctness and all this other garbage,” he insisted.

Show post
Andye Murphy #conspiracy gaia.com

13 Signs You Are an Indigo Child

Indigo Children are an upgraded blueprint of humanity. The term Indigo Child first came up when addressing the aura colors of these very different kids. Prior to their predominance, human auric fields were expected shades of the rainbow, the Indigos’ field however was dominated by this royal blue color which established a change of course for humanity.

WHO ARE THE INDIGO CHILDREN?
Gifted souls, on a clear mission to challenge and shift reality, they first began appearing in the 1970’s. Beyond psychic awareness, they are highly driven and creative with a perception that sees through the established norms of society. Old souls indeed, their mission is clearly laid out to shake up the modern world and pave the way for future generations to create greater peace and harmony for all.
Both of these generations of “children” are well into their teens and adulthood, so don’t allow the label to dissuade you from exploring the possibility that you are of this unique soul group.

13 COMMON TRAITS OF AN INDIGO CHILD
If you wonder if you might be of this distinct soul lineage, here are a few traits which may feel familiar.
1. YOU FEEL ENTITLED
You were born feeling special and know it.
2. YOU ARE DESTINED TO BE HERE
You are confident and even arrogant at times – and emboldened by something larger than you can name.
3. YOU HAVE HIGH EXPECTATIONS OF YOURSELF AND OTHERS
This can make for a challenging relationships and interactions. You see only the best and expect others to live up to it. Toward yourself, you can be unrelentingly self critical.
4. YOU ARE PERCEPTIVE
Indigos see the world differently. Coupled with innate-self assurance, you often think your way is right and are offended if others cannot see, much less take action, on your point of view. If Indigos ruled the world, you are confident no problems would exist.
5. YOU QUESTION AUTHORITY
You are not one to negotiate, so certain in your views and ways, you are often rebellious and critical of those in power.
6. YOU WANT TO OVERTURN THE MAN
Difficult and rigid systems seem foolish to you and you often become antagonistic to what others experience as normal.
7. YOU ARE CREATIVE
Musically and artistically gifted, your art invites others to see the world around through your eyes.
8. YOU ARE A CHANGE MAKER
Your perception on the failings of society is so keen that you are a magnificent leader, offering better methods of business, society and ways of being.
9. YOU ARE A LOST SOUL
You feel out of place with others as you recognize you are different than most people. You can tend toward being a loner or rebel, unwilling to compromise just to fit in.
10. YOU ARE DRIVEN
As the Indigo soul mission is encoded in your very being, you are unwilling to back down from confronting what feels out of integrity.
11. YOU ARE PASSIONATE AND FOCUSED
While fiery temperaments may be hard to take, you are not one to be still or silenced.
12. YOU ARE HIGHLY PSYCHIC
Without any need for development, your psychic capacity is finely tuned. While you see nothing special in your ability, it gives you an advantage in reading others with ease and seeing through masks.
13. YOU ARE FRUSTRATED
Coupled with their big-picture vision and restless soul drive for change, you become easily frustrated with society and others who are not shifting quickly enough. Patience is something that should be developed.

Show post
Mark Ballenger #fundie applygodsword.com

Perhaps the hardest question I’ve personally asked about the Bible is, “Why does God kill babies in the Old Testament?” I’ve never doubted God’s goodness, but if I’m being honest, seeing God command the death of children in the Old Testament has been very difficult to grapple with.

We are taught from a young age at church that God is love. We are told he is the kindest being who has or ever could exist. But then as we grow older we begin to read books of Scripture like Hosea and we read that God condones “little ones” being dashed against the rocks and pregnant women being torn open. If people don’t fully reject God because they find these things repulsive, often times people come to the conclusion that the Old Testament and the New Testament are divided. The Old Testament is about the God of anger but in the New Testament God changes and becomes a God of love.

There is a better way, however, to interpret these difficult passages. Everything in the Bible becomes much clearer when we have Jesus and the Gospel in mind. Jesus said that all of Scripture is actually about him (Matthew 24:27, John 5:39). Therefore when we read about children dying in the Old Testament we must think, “How does this point to Jesus and the Gospel?”

Everything in the Bible points to Jesus Christ, even the death of babies.

Why Does God Kill Babies in the Old Testament? Answer: Man’s Sin

There are many places in the Old Testament where God commands people to wipe out other people, including women, children, and even infants. Common examples include the death of the first born babies in Egypt when Pharaoh refused to release the Israelites (Exodus 11:1-10), the total annihilation of Sodom and Gomora which included the children (Genesis 19:23-29), God’s command to Saul to destroy Amalek including “both man and woman, child and infant” (1 Samuel 15:3), and throughout Deuteronomy God commands the people to destroy the people in the lands they will be invading (Deuteronomy 2:34; 3:6; 20:16-18).

Why does he do this? Why does God kill babies throughout the Old Testament? When Moses receives the 10 Commandments, God said:

You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.” (Exodus 20:4-6)

The simple answer to why God killed babies in the Old Testament is because of their parents’ sin. When we do not understand the scope of sin and the punishment a holy God requires of those who transgress against him, we will not understand how God could command the Israelites to destroy whole nations, including their children and infants.

The Death of Babies Does Not Mean God’s Love Is Lower Than We Thought. It Means Man’s Sin Is Greater Than We Thought

We get upset and confused when we read about God commanding the Israelites to wipe out groups of people, including children and infants, because we think this is not fair. By “not fair” we mean those children did not deserve to be killed. The Bible affirms this. It never says God punished the children for the children’s’ sins. In fact, all those children who died all went to heaven.

2 Samuel 12 gives us some good context here. David and Bathsheba sinned in adultery. They had a child through that affair. It states:

13 Then David confessed to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.”

Nathan replied, “Yes, but the Lord has forgiven you, and you won’t die for this sin. 14 Nevertheless, because you have shown utter contempt for the word of the Lord by doing this, your child will die.”

15 After Nathan returned to his home, the Lord sent a deadly illness to the child of David and Uriah’s wife. . . .

22 David replied, “I fasted and wept while the child was alive, for I said, ‘Perhaps the Lord will be gracious to me and let the child live.’ 23 But why should I fast when he is dead? Can I bring him back again? I will go to him one day, but he cannot return to me.”

24 Then David comforted Bathsheba, his wife, and slept with her. She became pregnant and gave birth to a son, and David named him Solomon. The Lord loved the child 25 and sent word through Nathan the prophet that they should name him Jedidiah (which means “beloved of the Lord”), as the Lord had commanded. (2 Samuel 12:13-15, 22-25).

The child dies because of David’s sin, not its own sin. But the child does go to heaven as we see in 2 Samuel 12:23. As we will talk about later in this article, all of this seems to foreshadow the death of Jesus. The first born died, which is a theme we see throughout Scripture. Surely this points to Jesus, who is the ultimate atoning sacrifice. When God chooses Solomon, David and Bathsheba’s second child, this shows God’s desire to restore what was lost because of sin, just as he restores those who put their faith in Jesus.

God “punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate [him]” (Exodus 20:5) is the law that was enforced when God commanded the death of babies in the Old Testament. This law does not cast a shadow on the love of God but a light on the sin of man. When we read about the deaths of babies in the Old Testament, the response should not be, “Wow, God’s love is so small.” Rather, we should say, “Man’s sin is so bad. Thank God Jesus came to pay this price so we do not have to.” When we read about the punishment of sin, we should say, “That’s why Jesus had to come.”

(Note: There is a biblical difference between “kill” and “murder.” Kill is used when you have the right to take a life. Capital punishment, war, and in other such contexts it is never murder since taking life here is appropriate. Murder occurs when you take a life and you do not have that right. God can never murder anyone since he is sovereign over all life. When and how we all die is God ordained. He decides when we will enter into our eternal destination. Whether it be at two weeks old our 102 years old, God is the one who decides when our time on this earth begins and ends.

Also, in the context of when these laws were given, Israel was a theocracy. Thus the commands were given literally by God himself. God lived with them in the tabernacle and the temple and showed himself in visible ways through incredible and miraculous ways (parting the red sea, appearing as a cloud of fire, producing water out of rocks, manna from heaven, etc.). These extreme laws were validated by God’s extreme clarity and manifest presence. As we will discuss next, the New Covenant changes our relationship with these laws. God is not dwelling among us like in a theocracy. Thus any argument to obey or recreate new laws like these old law are unbiblical.)

Children Should No Longer Be Punished for Their Parents Sin Because the New Covenant Replaced the Old Covenant

What makes this whole topic even a bit more confusing at first glance is that in other parts of Scripture God says that children should not be held responsible for the sins of their parents or ancestors. Ezekiel 18:1-4 states:

The word of the Lord came to me: 2 “What do you mean by repeating this proverb concerning the land of Israel, ‘The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge’? 3 As I live, declares the Lord God, this proverb shall no more be used by you in Israel. 4 Behold, all souls are mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is mine: the soul who sins shall die.

So does Exodus 20:5-6 contradict with Ezekiel 18:1-4? No. It is important to realize that the Bible is a progressive narrative outlining God’s redemptive plan for humanity. The Bible has a story line and there are many seasons in the Bible which are different than other seasons. Exodus 20:5-6 is describing the penalty for sin. Ezekiel 18:1-4 is pointing to the ultimate solution for sin in the cross of Jesus Christ. Our children will not need to pay for our sins because our sins are paid for by God’s Son. Look at the movement found in Jeremiah 31:27-33, for example:

27 “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man and the seed of beast. 28 And it shall come to pass that as I have watched over them to pluck up and break down, to overthrow, destroy, and bring harm, so I will watch over them to build and to plant, declares the Lord.29 In those days they shall no longer say:

“‘The fathers have eaten sour grapes,
and the children’s teeth are set on edge.’

30 But everyone shall die for his own iniquity. Each man who eats sour grapes, his teeth shall be set on edge.

31 “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. 33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people.”

Ezekiel 18:3 says “this proverb shall no more be used” and Jeremiah 31:27 says “the days are coming” and Jeremiah 31:29 says, “no longer say.” Why were these proverbs about children being punished for their parents sins once relevant but then we have passages speaking about the day when they will no longer be relevant? Jeremiah 31:31 states, “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant . . .” Of course we know this New Covenant is accomplished through Christ. Christ is the reason the punishment of our parents’ sin should no longer affect us. 2 Corinthians 3:7-11 again shows us how the Old Covenant was never meant to last but was to be replaced by the New Covenant ratified by the blood of Christ:

Now if the ministry of death, carved in letters on stone, came with such glory that the Israelites could not gaze at Moses’ face because of its glory, which was being brought to an end, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit have even more glory? 9 For if there was glory in the ministry of condemnation, the ministry of righteousness must far exceed it in glory.10 Indeed, in this case, what once had glory has come to have no glory at all, because of the glory that surpasses it. 11 For if what was being brought to an end came with glory, much more will what is permanent have glory.”

The Old Covenant brought through Moses “was being brought to an end.” In other words, no, the Bible does not contradict itself. When Exodus 20:5-6 says the children will be punished because of their parent’s hatred towards God, this reminds us of the terrible consequence of sin. That was the purpose of the law, to show us how terrible our sin is, “For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin” (Romans 3:20). Human sin was present before the law, but when we are given the law we become aware of how wrong our sin actually is.

While Exodus 20:5-6 and passages about God commanding babies and children to be killed in the Old Testament show us how terrible human sin is, Bible verses like Ezekiel 18:1-4 and Jeremiah 31:27-33 point to the coming solution in Jesus Christ. We are living in the days talked about in those Bible passages. Christ has come. Christ has died for our sins. Therefore no one needs to bear the punishment of sin anymore. Now the only people who will be punished for their own sin are those who refuse to allow Christ, God himself, to take their punishment on himself.

Jesus came to fulfill the law, including the law that children will have to pay the remaining balance on their parent’s sin.

The Death of Babies Mentioned in Hosea Remind Us of the Gospel

Hosea is a beautiful book that contains historical accounts that actually happened. However, this is clearly also a book that points to Jesus. God tells Hosea to marry a prostitute, Gomer. Hosea marries her, has children with her, but despite all his kindness and love towards her she returns to her life of prostitution. Instead of killing her as she deserves for her betrayal, God tells Hosea to purchase her back again (Hosea 3:1-5). Clearly this is a picture of Christ and his church. He saves us from our sin, he gives us good gifts, we still rebel, but he still pays the price of our sin and takes us back again and again because of the work of Christ on our behalf.

When you read further in Hosea, God begins to prophesy through Hosea about the sins and consequences of rebellious people. Notice in every passage where there is a promise of severe punishment like the death of children, there is also a very clear explanation that this consequence is due to sin:

. . . as Shalman devastated Beth Arbel on the day of battle, when mothers were dashed to the ground with their children. So will it happen to you, Bethel, because your wickedness is great” (Hosea 10:14-15).

“. . . Even if they bear children, I will slay their cherished offspring.” My God will reject them because they have not obeyed him; they will be wanderers among the nations (Hosea 9:16-17).

Notice that these massive consequences of sin are “because your wickedness is great” and “because they have not obeyed him.”

Sometimes It’s Not About Punishment. Sometimes God Allows Children to Die Because of the Choices of Their Parents

I’ve never heard an atheist or someone who despises God for the death of children in the Old Testament say something like, “God could have taken away the adults freedom and allowed their choices not to matter thus saving the children.” No, they want it both ways. They don’t like the idea of God being God but they also don’t like it when he allows people to feel the weight of freedom. When nations sin, God often removes his favor. When enemies invade, the children suffer because the parents’ actions caused God’s favor to be removed.

In Matthew 18:21-35 Jesus tells a parable where a servant could not pay a great debt owed to his master, “Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt” (Matthew 18:25). Here the Old Testament and the New Testament mirror each other in that it shows the consequences of our sins actually can affect other people, including our children. The wickedness of Nazi Germany brought Allie bombs to the whole country of Germany, killing not just soldiers but many innocent babies. The consequences of sinful adults in war often affect innocent children.

Human sin never happens in a vacuum. Your sin never just affects you. Just read through Joshua 7 and see how Achan’s sin caused God’s favor to be removed from his community. Eventually his sin caused the death of his whole family. Likewise, all humans have been given the weighty gift of real freedom. But real freedom has real consequences. No one could stand living in an existence where our choices really didn’t matter, where human freedom was just a mirage. And yet in our sin we also complain about human consequences.

Consequences are an essential ingredient to true freedom. We are free whether we like it or not, therefore our sin will hurt other people in our lives whether we like this truth or not. When you don’t go to work, your kids don’t have food to eat. When adults go to war with one another, children die. That’s the reality of our world. Likewise, that’s the clear takeaway when we see the how the parent’s sin caused the death of their children in the Old Testament. The parents were given a true choice to protect or not to protect their kids. When they forsook God, they forsook his favor and protection and the children suffered the consequences of the parent’s choices.

As horrible as this reality is, God uses this fact – the fact that our sin is so evil it will affect the innocent in our lives – to reveal to us just how evil our sinfulness really is. Nothing will awaken you more to the atrocity of your sinfulness than when you see it hurting those you love most.

In Matthew 18:27 it adds, “The servant’s master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.” The way God cancels our debt is through the blood of Christ. The point God is making through the death of innocent children due to the sin of their parents is not to show that God is hateful but to show how great and wicked our sin really is. Only when we realize this will we rely on the sacrifice of Christ as we should.

Why Did God Kill Babies in the Old Testament? He Ultimately Didn’t, Man’s Sin Killed These Innocent Children. Sin Always Produces Death

Everything in the Bible is about Jesus and his Gospel. God even uses the sins of parents which bring great consequences of evil upon innocent children as a means of pointing everyone to our need for Jesus. The death of babies in the Bible is not because of God’s wrath, but because of God’s wrath in response to evil sins committed by people. Man’s sin brings God’s judgment and removes God’s favor, and often the result of this horrible atrocity results in children being affected.

But this is why Jesus came to save us. He came to save us from these awful sins and the consequences of them. So when we read of babies dying at the command of God, we must praise God for the gospel which is able to save us from such divine wrath towards sin. We must reexamine our poor understanding of how awful our sin really is. We mustn’t blame God, we must blame human sin for the death of babies in the Old Testament. This should then awaken in us a greater appreciation and love for the gospel of Jesus Christ which alone can save us from such wrath.

Next time you come to a difficult passage in Scripture, filter it through the lens of Jesus and the Cross and see if it does not become instantly clear. God killed his own son in the New Testament so none of us would have to see the effects of human sin that are so clearly displayed in the Old Testament.

Show post
Jacob Harrison #fundie jacobharrisonanglocatholicsociety.blogspot.com

hydrolythe:
For somebody trying not to be homophobic you sure do are pretty damn homophobic. Here are all my issues:
1: There are no innate laws of nature. We didn't even reproduce sexually until the algae came along, which is certainly a long time. There is definitely the Christian metaphysical statement that we are created male and female, but it remains just that.
2: Great that you're propagating the theory that being gay causes AIDS. I'd say that the main reason AIDS is so prevalent is because of religious rallies against the condom and comprehensive sexual education. The virus will spread regardless of what our sexual orientation is.
3: The Bible clearly says that it was because they wanted to distance themselves from other cultures where homosexual seks was prevalent. Why even adding AIDS to the equation?
4: For some reasons Christians like you don't seem to have trouble with people who lend at interest, despite it clearly being against the Bible. Why is that? I'd say because that doesn't disgust people anymore.

Jacob Harrison:
1. Well what cause Algea to evolve sexually was for reproductive purposes.

2. Lack of sanitation in a hot desert environment like Ancient Israel causes aids. Ass fucking is generally less sanitary than normal vaginal sex. And abstinence only sex education teaches people the harms of sex to scare people into not having sex. It reduces the amount of people who have sex and therefore reduces aids.

3. I was referring to why it was dealt with harshly in the Old Testament not why it is forbidden in the New Testament.

4. I have a problem with lending at interest but unfortunetely that has prevailed today. In Merry Old England, laws were passed against lending at interest.

hydrolythe:
1. There is no "higher purpose" in evolution. I'd say that it was because sexual reproduction offered advantages at the time of the evolution happening.
2: Nope. Ass fucking and vaginal sex are equally unsanitory. Also, you act like you've never heard of the condom.
3: I too was referring to this. We might have differing translations, but mine clearly states that it was because of this.

Jacob Harrison:
1. Since our sexual hormones evolved for procreation, we should use it for procreation.

2. I heard of condoms but heard that even condoms are not 100 percent effective at preventing infections. Besides it is better to teach abstinence so that people don’t accidentally forget to use a condom which happens.

In the harsh unsanitary environment in ancient Israel the buttcrack would be full of bacteria from the persons shit so back then, anal sex was less sanitary.

3. Does it say that in the Old Testament or the New Testament in your Bible. Show me the verses and I’ll see what those verses say in the Latin Vulgate.

hydrolythe:
1: It is not because something has evolved for procreation that we ought to use it for procreation. Just because something "is" it does not mean that we "ought" to do it.
2: And what when abstinence fails?

You're also delusional if you think that the butt is less sanitary than the vagina. Both are equally likely to get you an STD.

3: It does say in the Old Testament. Specifically Leviticus 18:3

Jacob Harrison:

1. But not using it for what it is supposed to do goes against the laws of nature.

2. Well it will fail less when people will be taught abstinence. And when it fails, well a new baby ?? will be born.

3. It does say that it is an abomination. But that was not the reason why it was dealt with harshly in Leviticus. Remember, it was a harsh desert environment and toilet paper has not been invented yet. Imagine all the bacteria from the dirty buttcrack. ??

hydrolythe:

1: What laws of nature?

2: Dude. Having a baby should not be taken lightly. You'll lose time and money raising it.

3: Leviticus 18:3 says this: "Don't live following the habits of Egyptians where you lived, nor those of the Kana'n where I'll bring you. Don't live your life according to their predicaments and commandments, "

Also, I never said it was harshly dealt with in Leviticus because they believed it was an abomination. I said it was harshly dealt with it because they wanted to differentiate themselves from the other people in their surroundings.

Jacob Harrison:

1. The laws of nature is doing what is most natural. Since sexual hormones evolved for procreation, they should be used for procreation.

2. The baby can be adopted.

3. It was forbidden because God saw it as an abomination. God did not want the Israelites to practice the abominations of the surrounding cultures. However the Bible never says that it was the reason why the punishment was so harsh in the Old Testament.

hydrolythe:

1: There is no "doing most natural". Things mutate first and only after they've mutated we know if they've a purpose or not. Sexual hormones didn't evolve for procreation, they evolved due to different physical-chemical bonds being combined to form a being that can reproduce sexually.

2: Don't you think that adoption clinics are already filled with children? Why add more?

3: Therefore you can't claim to know the answer either.

Jacob Harrison:

1. Yes sexual hormones evolved to produce a being that can reproduce sexually so that there would be genetic diversity. So they did evolve for procreation.

2. The reason why there are so many is because abstinence is not taught.

3. I don’t know all the answers but I try to make the best guesses. It is the most likely explanation because otherwise it makes God’s morality subjective to the context of the time.

hydrolythe:

1: Evolution is not a guided process, but, by our standards, a random process. Homosexuality is just as much a product of evolution as heterosexuality. And since you didn't propose me any moral argument against it, let me propose one in favor of it. Namely, that they have happiness acting upon it and that if you forbid it, that you don't maximise happiness.

2: So does abstinence. And besides you're commiting the perfect solution fallacy. It's not because a solution isn't perfect that we shouldn't learn how to use it.

I'll leave you with this: "The perfect is the enemy of good." - Voltaire

3: So you agree that if a dog does something right and decent, even if that dog has no knowledge of what is right and decent, that it is a moral agent. This is weird, but I'll go with it. I disagree, for one, that one needs God in order to be moral under the definition you propose. Utilitarianism, for instance, is an objective moral code without God under the definition you proposed, since it says that maximizing the human happiness is a goal in itself. I would even say that it is more moral than God under that definition, because there are several rules in the Bible that prevent you from doing good works to people, such as not allowing the Ammonites and Moabites to become citizens of Israel.

Jacob Harrison:
1. Regardless of whether you believe that God was the mastermind, guiding the process of evolution or not, we know that it is the environment that causes the organisms to evolve. I am aware of the evidence that some homosexuals evolved as population control, but that does not mean that all homosexuals are born homosexual. Besides, for the ones that are, well that makes their sexual hormones a useless holdover like the appendix. It cannot be used for it’s evolutionary purpose of procreation, so it must not be used. Homosexuals can have as much happiness master-bating.

2. I am not commiting the perfect solution fallacy. I am saying that abstinence is a better solution than contraception because it is the only way to prevent pregnancies.

3. God wants to maximize human happiness, but he sets righteous guidelines to prevent bad things from happening. The Ammonites and Moabites were not allowed to become citizens because they were a threat to Israel.

Show post
Laneen "Dr. Intimacy" Haniah #fundie christiansexuality.wordpress.com

Someone sent me this article about a sect of Gay and Lesbian “Christians” from the Metropolitan Community Church and one of their leaders. I could not believe what I was reading:

“My technique of meditative prayer was to envision Christ with me and experience him as a lover. Scott Haleman, Betty Dodson, and Joe Kramer argue that masturbation can be spiritual and can become a form of transcendental meditation. Masturbation can harness fantasies and sexual energy. When prolonged, it can stimulate and extend pleasure. When fantasies are focused into making love with Christ, the experience opens itself to a fundamental and profound consciousness of God. My visualizations of Jesus were certainly explicit, erotically envisioning various forms of making love to Jesus the Christ. I had sexual intercourse with Jesus. Sometimes he was the top, and sometimes he was the bottom. My relationship with Christ was mutual and deep. (Rev. Dr. Robert E. Goss, senior pastor of the MCC’s “Church of the Valley” in North Hollywood, CA. In his 2002 book, Queering Christ) ”

I am sorry to even have to repeat such filth, but I think it is important for us all to understand the depth of depravity that exists in the world today. I have heard unrepentive homosexuals say some far out things about Jesus and his supposed homosexual lifestyle with the apostles, but this by far surpasses anything I’ve heard before.

In my book, The Spirits of Sexual Perversion Handbook, I talk about the spirit of sexual fantasy and how it detaches one from reality. Notice how in the above article sexual fantasy is mentioned. I also talk about the spirit of lust and how once you are taken by lasciviousness (extreme lust), you often become deeply involved in witchcraft and spiritualism and are forever lost. Notice how in the above they talk about transcendental meditation, a common form of witchcraft.

I hate to keep pounding the pavement on the masturbation issue, but I believe it to be such a dangerous practice. Have you ever heard of a gateway drug? Marijuana is often referred to as a gateway drug because it has been scientifically proved that it is not physically addictive. It is however mentally and emotionally addictive. Furthermore, it has also been proved through studies that the use of marijuana often leads to heavier drug use, such as crack and heroin. Therefore it is called the gateway drug. I call masturbation “the gateway sex”. Like marijuana, there is nothing about masturbation that is physically addictive, but it extremely mentally and emotionally addictive. It is difficult to masturbate without it leading to other acts of sexual depravity, especially sexual fantasy. It is also a door opener for homosexuality, fornication, lust and all other forms of perversion. The Bible says that we should give the devil no foothold. To all of you masturbation advocates, I would like to know why you would even want to toy around with this gateway sex called masturbation. Besides, how many practicing masturbators can honestly say that they do not fantasize while masturbating? If you think you can continue to masturbate and keep your sexual activity just at that level, you are fooling yourself!

I hope this will give you all something to think about concerning the dangers of masturbation because out of even those of us Christians that admit masturbation is a dangerous and unclean practice, very few of us really do what we have to do to get delivered from this activity. We say we want to stop, but do we really? Are you really willing to die to self, turn over your plate, turn off the TV and war with satan until you are free?

Have a lovely weekend. ??

In His Power,

Show post
Sargon of Akkad and Colin Robertson #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

Carl Benjamin, known online by his popular persona “Sargon of Akkad,” expressed his sympathies with the racist alt-right movement this week, including perpetuating alt-right propaganda that Heather Heyer was not killed by a car attack at the Unite the Right earlier this year, but instead suffered a heart attack due to poor health.

Benjamin joined Colin Robertson, known online as “Millennial Woes,” in the first installment of Robertson’s “Millenniyule 2017” interview series on Sunday, to discuss the future of the alt-right. As first pointed out by leftist twitter personality “Tom Bloke,” an early part of the discussion included Benjamin echoing white nationalist propaganda surrounding the murder of Heyer, a liberal counter-protester at the racist Unite the Right rally earlier this year in Charlottesville, Virginia.

“As I understand it, I thought Heather Hayes or Heyer or whatever her name was, I thought she died of a heart attack,” Benjamin said.

“Yes. It looks like what happened is that she was shocked by seeing the car crash happening and had a heart attack,” Robertson said.

Benjamin laughed and when Robertson remarked Heyer’s alleged heart attacked seemed “a bit dramatic,” Benjamin said, “It’s more that the alt-right being blamed for someone having a heart attack, someone in tremendously bad physical condition has a heart attack, and suddenly the alt-right has murdered someone.”

[...]

Later in the interview, Benjamin pushed another alt-right conspiracy theory that National Policy Institute white nationalist Richard Spencer was “controlled opposition,” meaning that he was a government agent embedded in the movement to give the alt-right a bad public image.

“The mainstream media could just have a policy of non-engagement and that would be more successful for kettling the alt-right than it would be promoting them. But I mean Richard Spencer is only a household name because of the media. Is Richard Spencer controlled opposition? I’m genuinely curious,” Benjamin asked Robertson.

As the interview began to wrap up, Benjamin gave parting advice to Robertson about successfully advancing the alt-right agenda because he believes that social justice advocates are “a fucking massive problem”

“You’ve got diversity in everything—everything,” Benjamin said.

“I know. I know, it’s terrible,” Robertson said.

“Yeah, it’s terrifying, isn’t it? But like [social justice warriors are] not just a loud fringe. They’re not. This what people have to—say ‘Oh, SJWs, they’re not a big problem’—no, they’re a fucking massive problem. I mean holy fuck, the reason thousands of young girls are getting raped is not because the police didn’t want to do something or couldn’t do something. It was because they were afraid of social justice warriors calling them racist,” Benjamin explained.

Benjamin later went on to conclude that “worst case scenario for the alt-right’s success in this endeavor,” referring to racial segregation, “is less intolerable to me and my family than the SJW success. So from a tactical evaluation, I have to choose this angle. I have to try and explain to the alt-right that they can get what they want and they should take this gambit, even if it means the end of liberal democracy.”

Show post
Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

American4Truth:
If you "identity" as something that you are not, then you are mentally ill, Period!

swibily:
Doesn't it require a mental health professional to make a diagnosis like that?

Amos Moses:
nope........

swibily:
Really, because I think it does. Otherwise it's an opinion.

Amos Moses:
and that is just YOUR opinion ........ so NOPE ........

swibily:
No, it isn't my opinion that making a medical diagnosis requires someone with medical credentials, so NOPE right back at you.

Amos Moses:
BUT .... it is JUST YOUR OPINION that this is a MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS ...... and FYI ..... NO "medical credentials" are required ....... so NOPE .......... it is however a SPIRITUAL diagnosis ..... and YOU are not qualified to make it .......... YUP .........

swibily:
You are not qualified to give a spiritual nor a medical diagnosis. I'm not providing either, just saying that if someone makes such a pronouncement they better have medical proof to back it up.

Amos Moses:
"You are not qualified to give a spiritual nor a medical diagnosis."

and again ..... THAT IS JUST YOUR OPINION ......... so who cares .... YOU are not qualified to judge if it is SPIRITUALLY diagnosed correctly as you reject those things ....... and we do not REQUIRE YOUR PERMISSION to do so ..... so NOPE .......... whatta ya gonna do about it hot shot ......... you and your multiple SOCK ACCOUNTS ..... and all of your ~200 comments here ........... DIDDLY .........

swibily:
I'm not here to argue with you. The bottom line is you cannot call something a mental illness if you're not in an intellectual position to make such a diagnosis.

Amos Moses:
"The bottom line is you cannot call something a mental illness if you're not in an intellectual position to make such a diagnosis."
ROTFL AGAIN ......... ummm ... again .... YOU are not an AUTHORITY HERE ..... and it is JUST YOUR OPINION that it is a MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS ...... and despite your objections to it ..... YES ..... we certainly CAN ..... FYI ..... it is not a "medical diagnosis" here as this is not a medical setting ...... so BOO to you .... and as i said ..... whatta ya gonna do about it hot shot ......... you and your multiple SOCK ACCOUNTS ..... and all of your ~200 comments here ...... right ..... DIDDLY .........

swibily:
I’m not attempting to BE an authority. You are. You are the one calling everything a mental illness just because you want to call it that.

Amos Moses:
"I’m not attempting to BE an authority. You are." ..... ROTFL .... LIE ....
ummmm .... okay ..... NOPE ...... the one, the only and the FINAL AUTHORITY here is scripture ..... not MY OPINION ..... and NOT YOURS ............ when and IF you ever can prove anything you say or accuse others here arises to meet scripture ..... then maybe some of what you say may be proven true ...... but none of it has so far ..... as you reject God and scripture ........
"You are the one calling everything a mental illness just because you want to call it that."
more lies .........

swibily:
Why are you dragging in all this irrelevant mush? All I am saying is you aren’t a medical professional so you aren’t qualified to cite mental illness. Which is perfectly true. A religious person with an opinion is just that.

Amos Moses:
Okay where is YOUR evidence that i am not .... right .... you have none .... and .... YOU constantly try to assert yourself as authority here .... AS YOU JUST DID .... with your assertion about my education .... and you LIED as you did so .... so NOT "irrelevant mush" ..

swibily:
Where did you obtain your Ph.d. from?

Amos Moses:
so you understand that to ask that question is a DIRECT admission that you have no evidence and that you lied ..... so thnx for your admission of guilt ...... and that is also an admission you are again trying to assert YOUR authority as if you had any to demand it be proven one way or the other and that you have again admitted that you lied that YOU do not try to assert authority here ... again ..... thnx for your admission ......
and to answer your question ...... nunya ... as in none of your business .... and my question to you is ..... WHY do you think you get to ask a person to DOX themselves in a public forum ..... and if you think that is not a big deal ...... ANSWER YOUR OWN question and DOX yourself ............
FYI ..... you have yet to prove such documentation is a requirement for anything outside of a medical setting ...... and you have to prove that just because a person has an alphabet behind their name that they are competent to determine anything especially in the field of inquiry they profess to be "expert" ............ see ..... that is ALSO an authority issue ..... and YOU are again asserting that as authority .....

swibily:
It isn’t about me.
I’m not making scientific claims.
That would be YOU doing that.
Problem is, you have no qualifications.

Amos Moses:
you are not a man (or woman) under authority ...... and therefore you have no authority ....... "Problem is, you have no qualifications." ..... you are not a competent judge to make that assessment ......... AND THAT IS A CLAIM YOU MADE .......

swibily:
None of this is about me, it’s about you calling things mental illness because you disapprove of them and not because they are actually mental illness. Unless you’d care to tell me where you got your Ph.d. from.

Amos Moses:
again .... trying to get a person to DOX themselves ... so ... YOU FIRST .... but the fact is YOU HAVE NO AUTHORITY to make any demand .... nor is your demand even worth considering as you have not PROVEN YOUR CLAIM that a FUD (Ph.D) is a requirement here or that it is a requirement OUTSIDE a medical setting ..... SO FIRST ...... PROVE YOUR CLAIM .........

swibily:
I do not require authority to request authority. I would not get on an airplane if I didn't know the pilot was qualified to fly the plane. I don't need authority to make such a request.

Amos Moses:
"I do not require authority to request authority."
sure ... request DENIED ........ you have no authority here .......... i do not grant you any authority ever and there is no one here able to grant it to you ..... the AUTHORITY here is scripture ... learn to use it and be under it ..... or take a hike .....
FYI .... i do not know what kind of an airplane you are referring to .... but if you get on a passenger jet ... and ask to see the pilots credentials .... i think the pilot would ask to see your credentials first i.e. your FAA credentials (AUTHORITY) .... and if you had none he or she would tell you to get off his plane ........... they are the captain ....... so nice bluff .....

swibily:
I don't have authority. I don't need it, and I am not using it. Understand that yet?
A patient doesn't need authority to request it of his doctor.
A passenger doesn't need authority to request it of his pilot.
A student doesn't need authority to request it of his teacher.
You are being requested for authority because you are diagnosing things as "mental illness" but you are not a doctor.

Amos Moses:
"A patient doesn't need authority to request it of his doctor.
A passenger doesn't need authority to request it of his pilot.
A student doesn't need authority to request it of his teacher."
you can try and assert that authority ... they might grant it .... we have NO authority to grant YOU authority to judge scripture ..... DENIED ....
"You are being requested for authority because you are diagnosing things as "mental illness" but you are not a doctor."....
you have no authority to make that assessment ...... you would have to have GREATER OR EQUAL AUTHORITY to do so .... if you do not hold at least equal authority YOU are not a competent judge .....SO ....
where is YOUR authority .......

swibily:
No one's asserting authority by asking a question. You are having a hard time with that one, aren't you?

Amos Moses:
YUP .... you are asserting a desire to judge it .... you are not a competent judge ........

Show post
Unknown author #conspiracy eng.the-liberty.com

In 1937, to bring the fight with the Chinese Nationalist Party to an end, Japan captured the capital, Nanking. At that time, it is alleged that the Japanese Army massacred 300 thousand people during a period of two months in what’s called the “Nanking Massacre”. But the evidences presented contradict each other and shows itself to be a clear forgery.

In Nanking at the time, the Nationalist Party troop’s Chiang Kai-Shek had retreated, and the remaining soldiers fought back as guerrilla fighters disguising themselves as civilians. As guerrilla warfare is illegal under international law, it is not a war crime to kill on sight. This was then called a “massacre of the citizens”.

Furthermore, the foreign journalist who reported on the massacre was someone who had deep relations with the Nationalist Party. For instance, Timperley of Australia, published “What War Means” in London in 1938, and reported this incident for the first time. As a third-party reporter, the work was considered as objective evidence for a long time, but it was later revealed that he was a consultant to the Nationalist Party. In his work, it is written that “300 thousand people were massacred,” but in 1938, an international committee reported that there were 49 cases of murder by the Japanese military during a period of 2 months.

Moreover, the Nationalist Party held press conferences in Hankou numerous times during the war, but they never touched upon the Nanking massacre. Not even Chiang Kai-shek claimed that a massacre had occured. If there indeed was a massacre, they would have announced it right away. Afterwards, there were no conspicuous reports about a massacre taking place until the issue was revisited at the Tokyo Trials that began in 1946. General Iwane Matsui, who was in command of the Nanking invasion, received the death penalty.

However, there were contradictions in the trial as well. Professor Bates who was part of the international committee in court stated that, “12 thousand people were massacred.” However, he also states later to a journalist of Asahi Newspaper, “It was a good thing that the well-ordered Japanese troops entered Nanking and brought peace,” (Masaaki Tanaka, “A Review of the ‘Nanking Incident’”) a complete opposite of what he said elsewhere. Furthermore, the population of Nanking at the time was some 200 thousand people, making it impossible that 300 thousand people were killed. It was in 1971 that the “Nanking Massacre” was brought to light after the war, via Asahi Newspaper journalist Mr. Katsuichi Honda’s “Travels in China”. In it, there are Chinese accounts about “the cruelty of the Japanese Army”, which was used to ignite condemnation of Japan by China. However, Mr. Honda had not done any background investigations to verify the Chinese accounts, and the published photos were also shown to be fabrications.

“The Rape of Nanking” (by Iris Chang) published in 1997, is well-known. This book, however, relies on one-sided accounts by the Chinese to support its claims. Furthermore, the author died a mysterious death thereafter. Unfortunately, due to propaganda by Chinese as well as by Allied powers, many in the world, including those in Japan, now mistakenly believe that the Nanking Massacre actually took place.

While it is widely believed that the Japanese Imperial Army, as can be seen in its description in the “Nanking Massacre”, was cruel, there is much evidence to suggest that the Army was actually very well-disciplined. General Matsui gave an order after capturing Nanking that “those who commit murder, looting, or violate military law will be severely punished”, and indeed punished misbehaving soldiers to the point that his subordinates voiced complaints.

The fact that the population of Nanking increased when refugees felt safe enough to return to the city after the Japanese Army expelled the Nationalist Party Army shows that there were no mass killings. Further, in the Great Famine of Henan, the Japanese Army gave food supplies to starving farmers. The French legal scholar Fauchille had judged that, “in the Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese Army observed international law in spite of their enemy having ignored it, and had pride in being a Japanese soldier.” Indeed, it was just a month before the Nanking Incident that the Japanese Army had decided as a matter of policy to protect the Jews. It is contradictory to claim that the same Army would observe human rights to protect a group of people, while committing mass murder against another. It is a historical truth that the Japanese Army dealt with the Chinese as Asian brethren humanely.

Show post
"the biggest skeptic in the world" #fundie w3school.com

PROOF THE BIBLE IS TRUE The WORLD'S BIGGEST SKEPTIC regarding the Bible
Later, he went to Israel and saw the evidence of Biblical places and prophecies.
There are app 10,385 Bible prophecies. NOT ONE has ever been wrong.
Life's #1 decision: Will you trust in Jesus plus read and obey the Bible?
God's Word reveals “What Lies Ahead” with 100% accuracy. Nuclear Blast

[...]

What you may be about to read or hear is true.
It has not been watered–down or modified to try and keep your attention.
It has not been altered, so it would say what your itching ears might want to hear.
An estimated 40,000 hours of Bible study & research over 35 years has been invested,
including trips to the actual places many events will or have already taken place.
Only Jesus Christ, Who is come in the flesh, is to be glorified.

[begins describing the rapture and its aftermath]

(Russia and Its Allies Attack Israel)

Not long after the Rapture, God will bring Russia forth against Israel. Iran and others will come also. Russian fighter planes Russia attacks Israel to carry away silver, gold, and food, and to take a great spoil. This indicates they will be hurting for food and finances. Are there any signs that this is beginning to happen now? Tiny Israel, despite its military advances, will have no chance. But, then, God steps in and makes His presence known. He destroys nearly all the invaders in such a way that the world will recognize Jesus Christ is alive and is protecting Israel–Ez 38,39.
The destruction of the invading armies will start with an earthquake. The invaders will go into a state of confusion and turn their weapons on each other. A plague and sickness will strike them. Heavy rains will come. Huge hailstones will rain down on them. Burning coals of sulfur will also come down. Only one–sixth of the Russian invaders will be left alive. The birds and wild animals will have a great feast. God will be glorified as a result. Those that plunder Israel will become plunder for Israel. The dead bodies will be buried for seven months. Then men will search for more bones.

(World War 3)

The USA becomes involved, but at what point is unclear. The destruction of the land of Russia (or Magog) and the USA follows. God will send fire upon both nations. The massive destruction will come from aircraft, missiles, and satellites of the opposing nation. The battle will take 4 hours of the day and 4 hours of the night. Thick clouds will cover one–third of the earth. The fiery red horse will have been unleashed. Are there any problems developing between the USA and Russia right now? Is much of the world turning against Israel, even though, in 1948, much of the world was “for” Israel? If you claim to be born again, but do not love God’s people, the Jews, you should examine yourself by God’s Word and repent.

(Results of World War 3)

One–fourth of the world’s population will ultimately die. The nearly two billion people that will die will have had no chance to repent, as this happens soon after the Rapture. Therefore, ALL perish to hell–ref Rev 6:8. Hell followed all that died. As a result of the Russian–USA exchange, one–third of trees will be burned up. All green grass worldwide will be burned up, as the radio active fallout follows the wind currents. This includes farm crops. One–third of the waters will become wormwood (or poisoned, or radioactive, or bitter). One–third of the sea will become blood. One–third of the creatures in the sea will die—thus, a shortage of fish. One–third of the ships will be destroyed. Few ever thought this war would happen. From this point on, much of the USA and Russia can be expected to be a radioactive pile of ash. They will no longer be on the world scene. The USA will be as a tree that is reduced to a stump. Few are left alive. The dead bodies will become food for the wild animals and birds. The USA has turned their back on God. The preaching has become watered–down. Nearly every perverse sin imaginable has become acceptable. Thus, God’s judgment will come.

How often do you fast unto the Lord—perhaps for a week each year? Do you ever fast even for a day? Do you tithe? God’s people that understand His Word do. The Bible teaches FEW go to heaven. Did you ever hear a clergy say any deceased person went to hell? Some even teach there is a purgatory. It is unbiblical–Lk 16:22,23; 2 Cor 5:8.

(After WW3)

A united Europe led by the Antichrist will reach far and wide. China and the Kings of the East will dominate the east. 144,000 male, virgin Jews will go forth with the Gospel. They should alert the world as to what is happening and lead many to repent and follow Christ. However, children will betray their parents to the authorities. Wives and husbands will betray each other. Hate and coldness will be everywhere, but even more toward those that would dare to believe in Christ. False christs and false prophets that do miracles will come forth causing many to be confused and misled.

(The Jews Return to Israel)

Israeli flag Following WW3, Jews from around the world that survived will be gathered to their own land of Israel, and none will be left behind. THEN THE INCREDIBLE HAPPENS. ONE–THIRD OF ISRAEL WILL BECOME FOLLOWERS OF JESUS. GOD REFINES THEM. HE TEACHES AND CORRECTS THEM. YET THE REST OF ISRAEL WILL STILL WALK CONTRARY TO GOD’S WAYS.

Massive famines will follow WW3. The price of a day’s food will be a day’s wages, if a person can find it. The black horse of starvation will be released. Increased earthquakes, unusual weather patterns, and huge tidal waves (or tsunamis) will continue to increase as birth pangs of a woman.

Show post
Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera #conspiracy miamiherald.com

Florida has a U.S. senator who once flew aboard the Space Shuttle. A congressional candidate from Miami can go one better: Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera says she’s been aboard a spaceship too. But this one was crewed by aliens. As in extraterrestrials. Three blond, big-bodied beings — two females, one male — visited her when she was 7 years old and have communicated telepathically with her several times in her life, she says. (Sen. Bill Nelson served as payload officer aboard the Space Shuttle Columbia in 1986. All seven people aboard were from Earth. As far as is known.)

Rodriguez Aguilera, 59, a Republican who is running to replace retiring Miami Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, recounted her experience with the ETs during a 2009 television interview. She described “going up” inside the spaceship — though whether it went into space or just hovered around town was left unclear. “I went in. There were some round seats that were there, and some quartz rocks that controlled the ship — not like airplanes,” Rodriguez Aguilera said.

In two separate videos posted to YouTube years ago, one by local Spanish-language station America TeVe and another by a political critic with the user name DoralGirl26, Rodriguez Aguilera spoke on television in detail about her extraterrestrial experiences. She said the alien beings reminded her of the famous statue in Rio de Janeiro, Christ the Redeemer, with arms outstretched.

Among the things she said she found out from the aliens:

? There are 30,000 skulls — “different from humans” — in a cave in the Mediterranean island of Malta.

? The world’s “energy center” is in Africa.

? The Coral Castle, a limestone tourist attraction South Miami-Dade, is actually an ancient Egyptian pyramid.

? “God is a universal energy.”

She also said that the aliens had mentioned Isis, though she didn’t clarify if they meant the terrorist organization or the ancient Egyptian goddess. The Miami Herald asked Rodriguez Aguilera about her experiences Friday. She responded with a statement that waxed astronomical, but sadly failed to mention close encounters of any kind.

“For years people, including Presidents like Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter and astronauts have publicly claimed to have seen unidentified flying objects and scientists like Stephen Hawking and institutions like the Vatican have stated that there are billions of galaxies in the universe and we are probably not alone,” she said. “I personally am a Christian and have a strong belief in God, I join the majority of Americans who believe that there must be intelligent life in the billions of planets and galaxies in the universe.”

Rodriguez Aguilera was a Doral councilwoman from 2012-14 and served as the city's first economic developer. She works as an entrepreneur and has taught leadership seminars at local universities. She declared her candidacy in late August and raised about $10,000 during the most recent fundraising quarter, she said — a paltry amount she attributed to halting her campaign during Hurricane Irma.

Rodriguez Aguilera’s daughter is former Republican National Committee Hispanic outreach director Bettina Inclán Agen. Her son-in-law, Jarrod Agen, is Vice President Mike Pence’s deputy chief of staff. Miami attorney Rick Yabor, a frequent political commentator in Spanish-language media, said Friday that Rodriguez Aguilera’s account could hurt her congressional campaign. Miami-Dade Commissioner Bruno Barreiro and former school board member and Miami-Dade County mayoral candidate Raquel Regalado, both far better known than Rodriguez Aguilera, are also running in the Republican primary.

“Being a politician, to come out and say that, it’s odd,” Yabor said. “She got into details that are not very mainstream. Someone who’s running for Congress — you’ve got to raise a lot of money. A donor might have second thoughts. “Miami politics are unusual,” Yabor said. “This one takes it to a new level.”

Show post
Tim Nolan #fundie rawstory.com

A former judge now serving as a school board member in suburban Cincinnati has been charged with felony human trafficking of a minor, felony inducing a minor to engage in sex and a third count of giving alcohol to a minor. The indictment was obtained by River City News publisher Michael Monks, who described Nolan as an, “outspoken and controversial” political figure.

Judge Tim Nolan of California, Kentucky represents District 5 on the Campbell County School Board. Yesterday afternoon he was lead into court wearing handcuffs as the “perp walk” was filmed by the local CBS station.

News anchor Cammy Dierking of WKRC described Judge Nolan as an, “outspoken supporter of the local Tea Party.”

The sex trafficking allegedly occurred in August 2016 — while Judge Nolan was serving as the chair of the Donald Trump campaign in Campbell County, KY. Trump beat Hillary Clinton 59% to 35% in the county while voters also elected Nolan.

In April of 2016, Nolan unsuccessfully attempted to remove Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell as a delegate to the RNC Convention. Between fighting Senator McConnell in April and the alleged crimes in August, Nolan was appointed by Governor Matt Bevin to the Kentucky Boxing and Wrestling Commission, but was removed only days later when a scandal erupted over a Ku Klux Klan photo posted to Nolan’s Facebook.

Unlike Republican Governor Bevin, the Trump Campaign chose not to drop Judge Nolan after the KKK scandal.

The alleged sex crimes were investigated by Campbell County Police, but Nolan was arraigned in front of Judge Elizabeth Chandler in Boone County District Court as Campbell County Circuit Court Clerk Taunya Nolan Jack is the daughter of the defendant — who served as a Campbell County Judge from 1978 to 1986.

Last November, Judge Nolan won a school board seat for a district with 5,000 students and 700 employees. Nolan beat an incumbent with 10 years of school board experience and 27 years experience as a teacher in the district by campaigning for so-called, “school choice vouchers” and for the elimination of all local property tax revenue for schools.

Rumors of the investigation surfaced in early April when Cincinnati Enquirer reporter Scott Wartman broke the news that Campbell County Police Chief Craig Sorrell had denied an open-records request that sought documents involving any investigation of Tim Nolan.

In announcing that the state’s Special Prosecution Division would be handling the case, the office of Attorney General Andy Beshear stated that, “a core mission of Beshear’s is to bring justice to the victims of rape, sexual assault and human trafficking.”

Nolan is being tracked by a court mandated ankle monitor after being released on $50,000 bond. A preliminary hearing has been scheduled for May 5 in Boone District Court.

Show post
NKP_Vet #fundie freerepublic.com

[Washington State Legislature has enough votes to legalize same-sex marriage.]

Christine Gregoire, just another pro-abortion, pro-sodomite “catholic”, that should be excommunicated from the Catholic Church. She can take that monkey-looking Cuomo creep from NY State with her. 95% of the land-mass of Washington State is as conservative as hell, but the millions of California transplants which make up socialist King County and surrounding Seattle domimate the politics in the state. And ground control to Gregoire, Cuomo, and the rest of the anti-God creeps that make up the democrat/socialist party there is no such thing as “gay marriage” and never will be. Marriage is between a man and woman, and these liberal anti-God morons will one day have to answer to their maker for mocking the Lord Jesus Christ.
Look for Hussein in tomorrow’s State of the Union address to come out in support of “gay marriage”. Larry Sinclair will be in attendance.

Show post
John MacArthur #fundie gty.org

If you’ve been a parent for any time at all, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that your child came into the world with an insatiable faculty for evil. Even before birth, your baby’s little heart was already programmed for sin and selfishness. The inclination toward depravity is such that, given free reign, every baby has the potential to become a monster.

Show post
Lark #fundie wattsupwiththat.com

CAGW gives its devotees a reason to have Power (control over others’ lives), Pelf (other peoples’ money) and Position (reason to consider themselves better than others). PPP is the holy trinity of the parasite class; CAGW can’t possibly be a lie.

But a parasite is never satisfied; taking stuff from the people who make stuff is their job and their joy; they will do it ’til the end of the world and never have enough.

Show post
SubMareener #fundie freerepublic.com

Remember when Caiaphas, the High Priest, prophesied about Jesus being the “one man” to die for the “nation”?

Well, I think we are seeing the same thing here. Of course, President Donald Trump doesn’t fear God in the sense Liberals mean, and he sure doesn’t fear “existential consequences”.

President Donald Trump is God’s Anointed for this time and purpose, and will be caught up with the rest of the Believers when Jesus calls for us.

Show post
Arnold Kennedy #fundie hope-of-israel.org

[Formatting in original]

One of the things peculiar to Western Society (as opposed to any others) is the teaching that racism is totally wrong. Yet, those who seek to enforce anti-discrimination laws (which include race, racial and national or ethnic origins, and religion) will immediately jump to the support of modern Jewry, as a special religious-racial group, even if modern Jewry is made up of people from many different races. In New Zealand people are actively discouraged from even questioning events of history that might undermine the enforcers’ determination of history in regard to “The Jews”. Their determination is very important to them, and, as such, is in itself racist. What is it that they are trying so hard to either protect or to promote? Might it be their false presentation that the Jews are Israel? Might not this be a mechanism by which the prince of this world seeks to eliminate the right message of the Bible? This is the master deception of Satan.

Would it not be Satan who is saying that the Potter does not make one vessel unto honor and another to dishonor, as Scripture says? Anti-racism is saying that every person of every race is the same in the eyes of man, and in Satan’s religious doctrines, this is the same in the eyes of YEHOVAH God. The issue is multi-culturism -- and this does not feature favorably through the Bible pages. Mixture of cultures is a source of conflict, both in religion and custom. Israel was separated from the other races, for a purpose. For Israel the Biblical message is still, "come ye out from amongst them, and be ye separate, saith the LORD" in the New Testament. The people being addressed in Corinthians had the “fathers” and were "baptized unto Moses" (1 Corinthians 4:1). They were Israelites!

Jeremiah 10:2, 3: "This saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen,…"

The "way" is derek which Strong's gives as "course of life, or mode of action." We should not be teaching indigenous culture in our schools.

Not one person can read the Old Testament without agreeing that YEHOVAH God is shown to be totally racist. YEHOVAH discriminated on the grounds of race and YEHOVAH God clearly treated races differently -- and even made differences between the tribes of Israel themselves.

The Children of Israel had a mission to eliminate the Canaanite races right down to women, children and even their animals. There are those whom YEHOVAH God says He will eliminate when the Messiah returns "at the brightness of his coming." The matter has to be faced; YEHOVAH God was totally racist in the Old Testament and we understand that He is unchanging for all time.

Show post
Red Subijano #fundie quora.com

How do I deal with a husband (stepdad to my daughter since she was 2; biological dad is not around) who tried to touch my 16 year-old daughter’s private parts?

Divorce is legal in the USA and I am sure there are advantages to it. But people should not use divorce whenever however etc. Stop using divorce as an excuse to every little problem.

When there’s a will there’s a way.

Many people have suggested “NO TALK!” here. I am trying to compose and control myself here to abide with the BNBR policy but every time I see that, and remember the broken families very much common in western countries, I feel my blood boiling inside.

No talk? Imagine if nations on the brink of war had a “no talk” policy? An ambassador was assassinated? No talk, we bomb you! A foreign national was kidnapped and beheaded? No talk, our soldiers are landing at your beaches.

Sometimes problems can’t be resolved by communication but it SHOULD be the first attempt. You send a message or call the other head of state instead of launching missiles at once.

Am I saying a divorced family is worse than an abusive family? No.

Am I saying an abusive family is worse than a divorced family? No.

Both are terrible things. Both are things a child should not go through.

What I noticed though, is that the OP has a daughter and this husband is her stepdad. Which means the OP has already left and divorced her first husband, and daughter’s biological dad. These ladies have already gone through the experience of being in a broken family and divorce.

This incident has happened. That is clear. What’s done is done. The man has done it. He did this. He has broken their trust. He is at fault. I am clear on that.

Let us consider the possible outcomes.

She does get up and leave right there and then, taking the daughter with her. This will 100% guaranteed they are both going to go through the pains and struggles of divorced and being in a broken family again. That we can be sure of.

If they all decide to sit and talk it can end as:

he is given a 2nd chance. He tries it again sadly. Abusive family. They divorce and leave.
she decided to leave regardless of talking. Divorced family.
they work things out. He becomes the father he wanted to be, she gets the father she never had, OP gets the husband she deserves. Happy family.
There is a CHANCE at making things right. A CHANCE to be a happy family. Where as in the first option, that is absolutely 0.

When you get burnt by your oven, do you toss it away suddenly or try to fix and check it at first?

When you accidentally get zapped fidgeting around the wiring of your PC, do you punch the screen, kick the CPU and scrap your PC, or do you carefully check the wiring first and see what might have caused it?

“Until now, there was no attempt from both ends to sit down and talk about what happened and how to move forward”

Can you blame them? This is probably difficult for BOTH of them. She is embarrassed and scared to face him. He is embarrassed and scared to face her. If you just sit and wait, nothing will happen.

If you make a mountain of a molehill, if you escalate the situation drastically, chances are you might cause an unexpected negative reaction and lasting impact to either or both of them.

he could turn spiteful, depressed, violent or suicidal
she could turn spiteful, depressed, violent or suicidal
you could turn spiteful, depressed, violent or suicidal
I would suggest you personally plan, and sit down together with BOTH of them. You will act as the middleman and the neutral ground between two of them. You will be the one in charge of keeping the mood as non-aggressive and calm as you can. Tensions will rise and you will have the responsibility to make sure to call for a time out if it gets too much.

Remember:

This is not a random stranger on the bus or street, this is your husband and her stepdad.
You are married to a human being who is not perfect and can make mistakes. You are not married to the son of god or something.
Would he do it again? Maybe? Maybe not. It is the first time. You can not judge and condemn a person outright for a first time mistake.
She is not a child anymore, but still not an adult. She is 16. She is bothered by this but she is already capable of facing it and learning how to deal with life problems and situations, things she will surely face herself in the future.

It is up to the OP and her daughter to decide, and that the husband can only agree to whatever decision they make.

But talking opens up opportunities to hear both sides as well as for OP and daughter to set new rules and restrictions for husband and challenge him to regain their trust.
...

She can organize the talk, give a chance to the man to prove himself, and at the same time still protect her daughter. She is NOT leaving her daughter as bait.

Also I noted that the daughter chose to go and talk to him at first, even before this question was asked, leading me to assume that the daughter herself wants to work things out. This is what the daughter might want. The OP is just there to be with her throughout this.

You have said you has been with this man 14 years (daughter is 16 and he has been with you since she was 2)

which is why we should not resort to divorce outright!

Show post
James Risdon #fundie lifesitenews.com

JERUSALEM, Israel, July 27, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Orthodox rabbis in the Holy City are reportedly calling out LGBT rights groups for using “aggressive terror” tactics to turn “perverts into heroes” in a letter published by Hebrew media.

The group of more than 200 rabbis wrote the letter in support of Jerusalem Chief Rabbi Aryeh Stern whose comments against LGBT adoption have created a stir.

In the wake of Israel passing a law to prevent gay couples from obtaining children through surrogates, massive protests erupted in Jerusalem Sunday, drawing upwards of 100,000 people.

LGBT activists were decrying the Israeli government’s claim that it would be an “additional burden” on the child to be adopted by a same-sex couple.

Then, Rabbi Stern whipped LGBT groups into frenzy by reportedly stating it is a “fact that kids are entering very strange and unnatural lives of living without a mother and a father”. He also reportedly called acting out as an LGBT person “forbidden”.

In a letter, more than 200 orthodox rabbis backed him up.

Advertisement

“[He] simply voiced the eternal truth of our holy Torah and human normality, which the healthy majority in Israel identifies with,” the rabbis wrote in that letter.

They accused LGBT groups of using “aggressive terror accompanied by non-stop media brainwashing,” in attempts to turn “perverts into heroes.”

That LGBT agenda will not succeed nor will attempts to shut rabbis and sane people up and try to turn them into delusional extremists, the rabbis reportedly wrote.

“Rabbi Stern was protecting the children of Israel, who will be miserable if they aren’t adopted by normal families,” the rabbis claimed.

In some LGBT media, the idea children raised by gay couples would fare any worse was summarily dismissed.

In an article in Pink News, writer Josh Jackman defended the ability of same-sex couples to raise happy, well-adjusted children by pointing to a study that concluded children of same-sex couples are just as happy and healthy as children of straight parents.

There are studies that show either no differences between children raised in same-sex households and those in traditional families with a married mom and dad. Many of those studies have been criticized for methodological sloppiness.

And there’s a lot of evidence in other studies that show a family with a married mother and father remains the best way to raise a child.

In his study, Growing up with gay parents: What is the big deal?, Dr. Richard P. Fitzgibbons surveyed those studies.

Among his findings, Fitzgibbons noted when gay couples bring a child into the world with the help of a surrogate, that boy or girl is more likely to have trouble adjusting by the age of seven than other children.

Advertisement

Another difference the physician highlighted was revealed in a 2013 Canadian study which showed children of gay and lesbian couples are only about 65 per cent as likely to graduate from high school as children of married, traditional couples.

In addition, a 2009 study of women raised by gay or bisexual fathers showed they were less comfortable with closeness and intimacy, less able to trust and depend on others, and experienced more anxiety in relationships compared to women raised by heterosexual parents.

Other studies report rates of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and emotional problems being twice as high among children raised by same-sex parents as among the general population.

“An objective examination of social science research into how families function reveals clearly that children do best when raised by both a mother and a father,” concluded Fitzgibbons.

Prior to becoming Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger summarized what several scientific studies of same-sex couples have since indicated.

“The absence of complementarity in these unions (same sex) creates obstacles in the normal development of children who would be placed in the care of such persons,” wrote Ratzinger, then head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. “They would be deprived of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood.

“Allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that the condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development,” he said.

Show post
unred typo #fundie christianforums.net

There is another cause for the changes that are evident in extinct animals, possibly even people, with features seldom if ever found among living specimens. In Jasher, Enoch, and even slightly in Genesis, it is recorded that some sort of genetic tampering was done that angered God. Also Jasher reports that as punishment for the tower building, God caused 1/3 of those involved to be morphed into ‘elephants and apes.’ While this sounds like a bit of myth, and it could be, there is a condition known as elephantitus that causes features that would fit this description.

Show post
BoyloveUberAlles! #sexist holocaust21.wordpress.com

Until the so-called “minor attracted” begin to FIGHT BACK against feminist scum, NOTHING will change!

That is why I support the targeted murder of ALL FEMINIST CHILD ABUSE PROFESSIONALS and any other internationalists.

Right now, frankly, I don’t respect minor-attracted people much. They’re cowards!

Show post
brucewhain #racist realjewnews.com

Yes, international banking is a Jewish conspiracy. But how much longer would it have taken to get to this point if not?

The more money there is, the sooner governments will be able to pass it out, and bring a permanent high standard of living.

(As a 60-yr-old Holocaust denier of German descent who has had his livelihood completely stolen by Jews and their ignorant pompous minions - and it had nothing to do with Holocaust denial - you can be sure I’m totally anti-Semitic.

“Though I recognize something intimately familiar for instance in the voice of David Cole, and we know Brother Nathanael is certainly more Jewish than the current pope is Catholic - bad example - but both great forces fighting what is wrong in the world.)

Ron Paul’s proposed law to monitor the Fed - if you look at the existing affected laws - amounted to exactly nothing. No change. And Paul’s ranting to end the Fed (though I would have voted for him) if carried out according to his plan, would have had disastrous consequences, not unlike many Jewish subversive takeovers, where people end up starving amidst the Jews’ violent suppression.

It was a publicity stunt - that got him more votes and approval than any other of his proposed policies. Because it brought to the fore that the Fed is a conspiracy and dishonestly highjacks public funds.

But the actions are not the big danger posed by Jewish conspiratorial influence. They have an incentive to make the monetary system work and bring prosperity - if they don’t, they lose.

So though all currencies in the Western world are carefully manipulated and kept within reasonable trading ranges by manipulation of the big banks - who of course communicate with each other and in this way have created for themselves a giant, perpetual and nearly limitless ATM machine - the alternative to this manipulation is economic disaster.

It’s the only moral thing to do!

I know most will agree that the Jews have turned the western monetary system(s) into a perpetual money-making machine faster that any other group would have been able to do it. So we stand to benefit, esp. as (God willing) openness on the internet, at least in the US, continues to be a reality - so when big thieving improprieties occur there is at least a possibility for jail time.

We are following Japan - a mature economy - into the unknown. Before cooperation from the Fed, Japan tried again and again to manipulate their currency to bring changes necessary for prosperity, to no avail.

Now with the (illegal) manipulation moving ahead and bringing stable exchange rates in the established economies it’s only a matter of tweaking to get it right - though China, with it’s overwhelming possession intrinsic valuables, may pose problems of integration versus our nebulous currencies. But gold is certainly not the only legitimate gauge if intrinsic value!

There’s food, oil, and importantly, real estate.

The place where the Jewish conspiracy is most dangerous and destructive is not in making money, but in their persistence in trying to take over the world through use of this partially ill gotten money.

Their actions reveal a kind of stupidity - a lack of creativity - They don’t know what to do with the money - or the power it gives them. But nevertheless they push everything and everyone aside with Talmudic zeal in order the carry out their idiotic, destructive conspiracies.

So dummy with lots of bucks decides - Oh, we’re going to take over Ukraine for a tiny Jewish clique of proven assholes. (Well you’ll agree it’s proven now at least.) We’ll have power! We’ve placed enough Jews in the state department and been channeling enough funds to Marxist-like violent political agitation that we will be able to “rule”.

(I hate the word: Jews constantly use it because they are so obsessed with this kind of thing - it is a defect in God’s workmanship.)

These people have been warned over and over - the repeated outcomes of genocide are staring them in the face - BUT YET THEY PERSIST.

They need permanent restraint, through use of physical restraint - pain if necessary - or it’s psychical equivalent.

Show post
CARLO ABRUZZI #fundie usa.forzanuova.info

Why Does It Seem So Much Harder to Find a Good Woman Now? Yes, It is the Jews Fault. Article by Carlo Abruzzi of Forza Nuova Arizona Division

image

Has anyone noticed how difficult it seems to find a decent woman who just wants to settle down, become a good wife, raise a normal family and grow old together? I have noticed this, and don’t worry you are not alone. The world is a different place than it was even 10 or 15 years ago. It is much, much harder to date and find a good woman to settle down with.
For most of civilized history, there was a social contract that existed between men, women, and governments. The social contract basically stated that if you, as a man, served your nation you would be rewarded with at least a decent looking woman to settle down and have kids with. You would serve your country and in return get to pass on your genetics. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me.

Times seem to be reverting back to what they were before civilized society. There is evidence to show that before the advent of modern civilizations, 1 in every 17 men were able to breed. The rest of men were essentially “Incels” and died off. In an ancient society one could argue that this would be beneficial. That women were the choosers and would select the strongest men to carry on society as any other life form does (see Darwinian theory). However, we have more than moved on from stupid archaic ways of choosing mates and you could argue that smart people are generally superior to facially attractive people now.

I really don’t want to go into too much detail on what makes someone genetically superior to someone else based on facial aesthetics. If you are a lurker and want to you can email me at usa@forzanuova.info and I can explain to you in further detail. The point is, times have changed and we haven’t kept up with technology.

When the Jews, Sean Rad and Jonathan Badeen, invented the concept of the commercialization of dating with Tinder and all their other Marxist apps, they directly targeted goyim women.
You see, Tinder puts dating in the hands of women because men are willing to meet up with multiple women, whilst women are not. In ancient times, this was not a bad thing because the physically strongest would pass on their genes, but nowadays we need smarter people to carry us forward. Tinder, and all the other Jewish dating apps, reduce people to aesthetically good looking faces, but makes women overlook everything else. Back in the 1950’s you actually had to judge someone based on their personality and looks. Nowadays, women only care about who is the prettiest “Chad” (good looking aesthetically) and couldn’t care less about lesser looking males. Don’t get me wrong we want to strive for the best genes through eugenics, but this includes a sorting of the best intelligence and facially aesthetic genes.

Anyways, Tinder has allowed women to be much more selective with the men they choose, but only aesthetically. You could be a complete subhuman “personality wise” but the 8/10 Chads will hoard all of the women, while everyone else twiddles their thumbs. This is no way to run a society, because the 80% of lesser males don’t get the women, while the 20% of top males hoard the best women and use them up in their prime. With 80% of men unhappy, our society will be chock full of anger. Throw in brown subhuman immigrants, and you have chaos.
The meme below kind of describes a 20% Chad. Memes are extremely important to advancing our cause, to the extent that the European Union has threatened to ban them: https://www.inverse.com/article/46719-eu-rejects-bill-to-ban-memes-from-the-internet.

So, with Tinder and all of these Jewish apps, expect to continue to have a much harder time finding someone to settle down with to start a family. You, as an Italian man, will be subordinated by the 20% of Chads and all of the other uplifted (by ZOG) negroes fresh of the boat into Italy. A simple solution would be to ban Jewish apps and revert to a nationalistic way of governance.

These kinds of memes help us nationalists push our message into the mainstream and get people to accept our ideas.

A sample Chad v Virgin meme that the EU wants to ban:

image

If there are any errors in this article or if it is incomplete I apologize, but I work all day long at a stupid day job and then come home to write on this website. It is difficult to juggle both, but I believe Italy is a cause worth fighting for.

Carlo Abruzzi – Forza Nuova Arizona

Show post
Unknown author #fundie en.minghui.org

Another practitioner and I planned to see the Shen Yun performance at 2:00 p.m. on Saturday, March 18, 2017, in Connecticut. However, when I checked the weather forecast on Friday, it said that there was a 50% chance of snow between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. I thought that the weather might discourage many people from attending the show.

Since I was off work that Friday, I decided to send righteous thoughts every hour on the hour. I saw through my celestial eye a green bead in the sky above the theater, which made me think that we should go to the theater before the show and send righteous thoughts.

I also saw snow on the way to Connecticut and Faluns. Above the theater, I saw the last name of the practitioner I was going to see the show with, along with a Falun. I immediately called the practitioner and said, “Our mission tomorrow is to clean up the evil that is attempting to keep people from going to the show. We must protect and help them to attend the show.”

I also said that I could only eliminate evil elements from the dimensions designated to me, and I could not do the same in others' dimensions. We agreed to send righteous thoughts at the top of every hour to clear up the weather for the following day.

When I woke up at 4:00 a.m., the weather forecast had not changed. I decided to meditate and clear up the weather later.

My celestial eye showed me that Master was surrounded by a big fire. I felt very sad to see Master suffering for us. A week prior, I saw that Master was hit by the evil’s “nuclear bomb.” Although Master blocked the scene with a white matter, I still saw that he was bleeding.

I was shocked to see Master’s horrific wound. After I finished meditating, the weather forecast improved. Light snow was predicted between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m.. I began to cry, knowing that Master suffered burns so people could attend the Shun Yun show. I knew that what I had seen was just the tip of the iceberg.

We left for Connecticut at 10:00 a.m.. We did not encounter snow or rain on the road, despite the forecast of snow for New York. Entering Connecticut, the weather got even better. It remained sunny until the show ended at 4:30 p.m. After we got back to New York after 6:00 p.m., there was a light drizzle.

The show was a huge success, and the theater was packed. I was so happy for the audience members. They had no idea how much Master suffered in order to save them. My heart was crying for Master’s boundless compassion. I also felt ashamed that we did not do our job well and let Master down.

I got a message from a practitioner at 10:00 p.m. on March 24, 2017. Mexico City had a power outage one hour before the Shen Yun show was to begin. I immediately began sending righteous thoughts. I knew Master would not allow the old forces to commit such a crime. I was fully confident that the interference would be cleared soon. Shortly afterward, I got another message that the power had been restored.

Although I can only see a few things, every time I see Master suffering for people, I am shocked and deeply touched. I also feel extremely fortunate to be able to help Master in saving people. I have no idea how much longer I can continue to do this. I do not even dare to think about that. I can never do enough to deserve Master’s compassion.

Show post
Paul Ellis #fundie escapetoreality.org

In the film The Wedding Singer, there’s a scene that captures the story of God’s relationship to us.

A waitress called Julia is preparing for marriage but she’s marrying the wrong guy. We know it and eventually Julia begins to realize it too. What she doesn’t know is that the right guy is closer than she thinks. He’s a singer who works the same weddings where Julia waitresses. This guy is crazy about her. He thinks about her all the time and he’s torn up that she’s chosen the wrong guy.

But everything turns out fine in the end. On an airplane ride to Vegas, the man who sings at weddings sings of his love for Julia. She responds by declaring her love for him, they kiss and then they wed. Pass the tissues because it’s a great story.

Humans were made to make choices. The reason The Wedding Singer and a thousand other stories resonate is because they are about a choice. Will she? Won’t she? I hope she does.

When God first made man, he said, “You are free to choose what you eat.” And the first thing God asked man to do was choose names for all the animals. The freedom to choose is what makes us human. Take away our God-given freedom and we will fight to get it back. And if we can’t live free history has shown we’d often rather not live at all.

And this is why I have a problem with certain teachings that suggest God has wed us against our wishes. He’s not a wedding singer serenading us on the plane to Vegas. Apparently he married us already, without asking, and without our permission. It’s a bad story.

The arranged marriage of inclusionism

The doctrine of inclusion states that you, I, and every person who ever lived, was saved 2,000 years ago and as a result, we are all in union with Christ, whether we believe it or not. Think of the least godly person you can imagine – say that guy who designs shoe bombs for Al-Qaeda, or Anders Breivik the Norwegian who shot a bunch of children. These men, apparently, are your brothers in Christ, filled with the Holy Spirit, and seated in heavenly places with Jesus.

I honestly don’t know how people can say this stuff without blushing. And yet, some are saying exactly this.

Yesterday I got two emails asking for my thoughts on inclusionism. I get asked about this all the time. Here is my response:

Those who claim humanity was saved at the cross are saying, God wed us without asking us. In a shotgun wedding God imposed his will on us and now we are married to Jesus whether we like it or not.

This is an unthinkable and inhuman proposition. And it leads to an obvious question: If God was ever going to take us against our will, why didn’t he do it in the Garden before Adam fell? Why wait until we had made a mess of things?

No, God did not coerce Adam and he will not coerce you. The invitation to trust him is a choice we all get to make. Indeed, it is…

The Choice we were born to make

“But Paul, you are making faith into a work. Nobody is saved by their works of believing.”

It’s true that some define faith as a work and make themselves susceptible to DIY religion. But faith is not a work. Faith is a rest. Faith is a positive response to what God has said or done.

Now here’s the thing: Not everybody responds positively to Jesus but everybody responds. Some respond with love and awe (think Peter and the apostles); others respond with hatred and murder (think Herod and the Pharisees). And some respond with hatred first and love later (think Paul).

What about the agnostics who say, “I haven’t decided yet?” My view is everybody gets a chance, and sometimes many chances, to respond to God’s grace. (I’ll talk about babies and others who are incapable of responding another time.)

If you are old enough to read this, you are old enough to respond to love and grace. This is not rocket science. All of us need love. We were made for it. We crave it. We were hardwired to respond to the unconditional love of our Father. His love is something we need and actually want to receive.

Everybody responds

Inclusionists do one of two things with faith; they either dismiss it or say everyone has it. What they should say is everyone has a choice. You can respond with a smile or a frown, a “yes please” or a “no thanks,” a “thy will be done” or a “my will be done.” It’s your choice. Much of life is making choices.

Some were convinced by what he said, but others would not believe. (Act 28:24)

When Paul proclaimed the gospel in Rome, everyone responded. Some positively, others negatively. How did Paul respond to those who responded negatively? Did he say, “It doesn’t matter. You are guys are saved and seated with Christ anyway.” No, he said things like, “Your blood be on your own heads” (Acts 18:6). In Rome he rebuked them for not believing (Acts 28:25-28).

The true wedding singer

Jesus is the wedding singer. He has come to your door to serenade you with the sweet songs of his love and grace. You may respond by opening your heart or shutting your ears but you will respond. In the final analysis, everybody does because this is the Choice we were born for.

Don’t let anyone tell you God smashed down your door and took you against your will and don’t let anyone tell you that responding to grace with gratitude is any sort of work. No, the real work is in resisting the testimony of creation, the miracle of life, and the persuasive pull of the Holy Spirit. Those who open their hearts to Jesus are those who are done working and are ready to put their feet up in the presence of the greatest Lover of all.

Adam took away our choice, but Jesus won it back. It is for freedom that Christ has set you free so stand firm and let no one deprive you of your God-given freedom to choose.
The gospel is not the perverse announcement that you were married against your wishes to a stranger. It is the happy declaration that God loves you and will give up everything he has to have you.

Show post
CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

If I had been in charge of Unite The Right (the group which planned the C’ville debacle, assuming they weren’t all FBI plants), no way would people be out there marching with nazi paraphernalia to play right into the media’s preconstructed narrative. First, I’d have focused the message on defending free speech/assembly. Second, I’d have created new symbols to rally around, symbols the media was unfamiliar with and couldn’t pigeonhole.

This was a big reason why the 2016 Pepe the frog meme was so successful; the media didn’t know what to do with it and were caught flat-footed, unable to mount an effective defense. A cute frog is the symbol of White awareness? Oy vey it’s all so strange! Pepe is overused now, but his lesson remains: defy the expectations of your enemies.

Two of the 48 Laws of Power apply.

Law 17: Cultivate an air of Unpredictability.

Humans are creatures of habit with an insatiable need to see familiarity in other people’s actions. Your predictability gives them a sense of control. Turn the tables: Be deliberately unpredictable. Behavior that seems to have no consistency or purpose will keep them off- balance and they will wear themselves out trying to explain your moves. Taken to an extreme, this strategy can intimidate and terrorize.

Law 48: Assume Formlessness.

By taking a shape, by having a visible plan, you open yourself to attack. Instead of taking a form for your enemy to grasp keep yourself adaptable and on the move. Accept the fact that nothing is certain and no law is fixed. The best way to protect yourself is to be as fluid and formless as water; never bet on stability or lasting order. Everything changes.

And yes I know the 48 Laws of Power was written by an international frugalist. Perfect. You take the useful stuff they create and use it against them.

When you have power, you can bulldoze your opposition.

When powerless, you have to find different paths to victory. Bulldozing will only incite a more powerful counterattack; that’s what happened to UTR. Instead, the powerless must rely on insinuation, guile, cleverness, misdirection, and subversion, confusing and demoralizing their enemies.

So if I were Head of Counter-Narrative Activism, where would I start?

I’d start with a protest at the foot of the Yarrabee Farms property, owned and operated by CEO and Boomercuck Craig Lang. That’s his company which illegally employed the churlish chalupa Cristhian Rivera (undocumented immigrant née foreign invader) who murdered American White Girl Mollie Tibbetts. Banner? NO CHEAP LABOR NO CHEAP VOTES GOP CUCKS GET THE R0PE

Shame these traitorous BigAg Midlands cucks into joining Team Trump with everything they’ve got. Cucks still do feel shame, right? Or is that another virtue cucks lost on the way to rationalizing the annihilation of Heritage America for a fatter loan on home equity?

Show post
Faustus Crow #conspiracy faustuscrow.wordpress.com

TIME TUNNEL CATWOMAN
image
Many a folklore tale to tell of Wizard of Oz, Bubble Witches hovering around as orbs, who to lab-coat Catwalk the ghostly ley-lines, all as predatory Sphinx’s.
image
Their nature ever so feline of slanted mirrored eyes, who can be likened to the Japanese Succubae called, Kitsune with their ‘Hoshi Noh Tama’ Star Balls.
There are those who conjecture that the feline Bubble Witches are extraterrestrial aliens from another world or to be interdimensional entities who emanate from some other dimension, or to come from an alternate Earth, which to exist within a parallel universe.
Whatever the origins of the Bubble Witches be, they are very much tied up with their ‘quantum computing’ tesseract hypercubes tuning into hypersphere star balls, in order to access alternate Earth’s, wherein be their alternate selves.
Move over Creepypasta reptilian Annunaki, along with the Illuminati Grey alien fear porn, of a U.S. media reptilian brain-stem zap; here Cums the Bubble Witches!
image
The symbolic correspondences are there to see, and of the Wyrd they be, which to weirdly reveal the actress Lee Meriwether playing many an archetypal role.
H.G. Wells Catwoman Sphinx being the wormhole lock, to Riddler unlock, with a Joker key!
Some physicists suspect that electrons are mini-wormholes; though far too small for a physical astronaut to enter their spherical star ball holes.
Such would not restrict the lucid consciousness of a psychonaut to slide into within an electron dream, whose brain would in future be wired up to a quantum computer.
The artificial intelligence of said quantum computer would very likely be programmed with a female personality, which of predatory nature, like many a woman, would be feline.
image
But what of the present? A psychonaut shaman can presently penetrate a spherical hole, of hyperspace intercourse, when to conjure a bubble Witch Yoni Stargate, out of a grimoire, within a lucid dream, as his personal Time Tunnel lab-coat assistant.
The shaman to enter trance upon a drum beat, so as to slide Serpent-wise of phallic ingress into the vaginal star barrelled Time Tunnel, like a bat flying into the womb cave of the Sphinx.
The Near Death Experience to speak of such a tunnel, which of an experience can be seen as being akin to Shiva entering into the vaginal maw of a Kali Hadron Collider, circled of a Magic Circle Ouroboros.
image
The ancient Egyptian shaman Pharaoh also to know of the tunnel as the vaginal abyss, which to verily lead to the womb realm of the Duat.
The Shaman to then ‘Travel Without Moving’ as the tunnel appears to fly by of spiraling informational streams.
Such be the process of ‘Browsing,’ the physicist James Gates to have found of ‘Computer’ code embedded in Superstring theory.

Show post
FRANCESCO LATORRE #fundie usa.forzanuova.info

Recently, there has been an exponential growth of nationalism as a political ideology, across Europe and even beyond our European continental borders. Such a growth is justified, in a succinct assessment, by the multicultural policies and moral, cultural and historical revisionisms that have affected the European people, as well as the people’s nonconformity with the current political system which offers the condition of “served” to the political and bourgeois class and not to the “third estate”.

Today’s nationalists, who face the system, dictatorially disguised and designated as “liberal” and capitalist “democracy”, are labeled as “far right” who hate foreigners, refugees, Islamists, ethnic minorities, and so on. From such criticisms comes only the word hate. They always try to show any identitarian or nationalist movement as hateful. When in fact it is the extreme opposite.

Nationalist movements preach for true love, a love passed down through generations, from father to son, transmitted by our earliest ancestors. Just as we love our family, we love our homeland, which is just an extension of our family. We love our soil, our culture, our identity, our values and our history. This is why our ancestors fought and sacrificed to protect, in the hope of a territory progressively and subsequently develop. And that is why we honour our ancestors, of blood and spiritual level, and we must equally protect our nation and existence. Our feelings go through love, duty and respect. Such sentiments bear responsibility, evoke resistance and drive revolution, in a modern world that increasingly repudiates such values.

But why are we, then, described as hateful? Because while the accuser points a finger at us, there are three others facing him! Globalists and elitists hate traditions and identities. They hate the fact that we have something to love and to fight for. These creatures have as “sanguine” and spiritual roots, the “rectangle-shaped green paper, with algorithms at its center” and the “big, heavy gold bars.” They are not humans. They are international elements, of evil and imperialist nature, that spread throughout the world causing destruction and misery, being such features explicitly visible in Africa. They “throw” people and cultures against each other, hoping for more wars to finance their “pockets” and thus they do not want peace because it is neither profitable nor productive. Because of this, they hate the being who loves his homeland and the one who begins to understand the tactics of their empire-globalist monopoly.

The question that some readers are maybe thinking at the moment is about patriotism and its differences in the face of nationalism, at the political-ideological level. And the answer is simple. The destruction of Europe and its sovereignty, economically, culturally and spiritually, has a price! And a “change”! Revenge is the justice of man and the recovery of his relief and his state of soul of tranquility. It is not enough to live in peace, even because we are far from reaching it. We must fight for peace, for freedom and consequently for revenge, in order to avoid, in the future, the loss of our existential and economic independence. And if you presume that this is hatred and extremism, in its pure state, you are deceived! It is only followed one scientific principle, in the laws of physics of Isaac Newton. “For every action there is a reaction.”

Show post
CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

Something horribly invidious happened to America around the late 1960s and early 1970s that abruptly turned the country from greatness to a path of decline, navel-gazing solipsism, and now finally to racial self-annihilation. Soy and sugar in the food supply? The explosion of a twisted ideology into everyday life? The Pill? TeeVee?

I’ll tell you something, the hallmark of national decline is the rise of the gynarchy and the diminution of male talents and preferences.

Gizmos = male
Paperwork and Lawyering = female

You want American history in a pithy aphorism? How about this:

Male became Female. Then came the End.

Or maybe you like your pithy aphorisms with more focus and bite:

Christian European became….

you catch my drift.

Boys used to be encouraged to tinker with material objects. Now they’re encouraged to explore their emotional landscape and inner femininity (while girls are pushed to become second-rate boys). Both White boys and White girls are brainwashed on a daily basis by every institutional power to hate their race, heritage, and ancestors’ accomplishments. An accident of decadence, or the rotten fruits of a deliberately perpetrated evil?

We can turn this sinking ship around and steer it to safe harbor, but that will mean returning to the wrong side of history where we laud boys for their distinctiveness and encourage them to tinker, not shame them for preferring stoicism over social justice blubbering. On the flip side, it will mean stopping the inhuman agenda of praising girls for acting boy-like and pushing girls to think their natural female talents are signs of weakness. Less “leaning in”, more “leaving alone” to pursue the lives their sex-based dispositions organically push them toward.

[Emphasis added; that particular bit flies in the face of everything else Weidmann has ever said about women and their place in society]

The Paperwork and Lawyering crowd needs to back off and allow the Gizmo crowd to rule again. If the P&Lers won’t (they won’t), then our culture will die, or the Gizmos will fashion new machines to loosen power from the soy-weakened grips of the P&Ls.

Show post
Farther #racist forums.myspace.com

BLACK WOMEN Dating and MARRYING WHITE MEN #2 Before I begin this post I would like to thank everyone for their response
to my previous threads.

WARNING
the information in this post may not be suitable for all readers.
Reader discretions are advised. The Blackwoman will date, and as reported daily, will marry a white man. She finds in her relationship with the white man perhaps the answer to all her dreams and fantasies.

First, he is removed from the black experience, and brings a new set of rules to the involvement. Second, he represents the culmination of every movie and T.V. show she has ever seen featuring a gallant white beau who knows how to treat a woman and swoops in always coming to her rescue. Third, he is an alternative set of men whom sheBelieves can be utilized because of the non availability of Black men.

Now that there appears to be fewer Blackmen, and she can’t get along with any of them, she is perusing other races to see what she can see. When the Blackwoman gets with a white man she may manufacture a complete new set of vowels which she uses to construct her new light and airy “proper” voice. She irresistibly become ever so amused by his jokes and pretends to like the things he does.

She becomes an actress of sorts and she relaxes a bit because the white man does not know the full story of her failure with the Blackman. Since the white man does not know the ins and outs of Black intimacy he is more tolerant of her and they both enjoy the novelty. She can wear as much make-up as she desires and to the white man this is normal. While the Blackwoman is known to ignore a Blackman on a street corner, in an elevator or on the subway, she seems always ready with an eager appealing smile when a white man, especially one in a suit and tie, tries to make light conversation with her. She appears to be flattered and falls into crisp bright personality. Her smile is sometimes so instant it looks like a flash of sparkling white snow, blushing and appreciative.If she decides to date him, later on, she is seen to be overly affectionate in public. ThereMay be hugging, provocative kissing or fondling in public.She is willing to ignore many of the white man’s shortcomings regarding wardrobe, language, music, car, or job. She convinces herself that he is normal and she must accept him as he is, and above all he is just another man. When she is with him she thinks she is finally free.Free of the Blackman’s hassles and free of her own history. She is proud of the him in front of her family and friends or on the other extreme; she knows that her social integration relationship will not be accepted, so she keeps it a secret. He is considered special to her and automatically “knows how to treat a woman.”

Certainly better than a Blackman does-she thinks. CONCLUSIONThe Blackwoman believes that she has reached the ultimate pinnacle of personal developmental achievement when she arrives at the point of seriously considering dating a white man and if watched closely she can be seen acting out the mannerisms of white women. She has absolutely forgiven the white man for enslaving her people, and the white man has forgiven himself for enslaving Black people. But the poor Black woman has not forgiven herself for being a slave.

Show post
Justinian #fundie the-spearhead.com

Perhaps Muslims aren’t barbarians after all when it comes to thier “backwards” rape laws. Could it be the wisdom of the centuries has structured a society based on the realistic nature of woman?

Show post
jamesE82 #fundie jamese82.deviantart.com

So there I was, minding my own business, trying to hold to the pledge to keep political discourse to a minimum for a while, when out of the blue I receive a comment from a woman who was, um… unhappy is how I’ll put it. She was unhappy, and being… oh, how shall I put this… difficult. Yes, that is the most polite way to say it; she was being a difficult woman, who was unhappy at me. She was unhappy and felt the need to be difficult because of comments I made two months ago on someone else’s page, where I showed my support for the page owner’s posting of a pro-Christmas picture. A pro-Christmas picture in December, it seems, made this difficult woman unhappy, and she felt the need to let me know about it. While doing so she did what liberals usually do, which is to assume they know Christianity better than Christians do, accuse me of having the negative qualities that she herself was displaying, deny that America was founded on Christian principles, etc. There was nothing new in her outrage that my support of Christmas caused in her, and I considered showing her comment the attention it deserved by not responding, but one particular word she used got me thinking…

Theist. Why is it, I wondered, that she was using that term while discussing a Christian holiday, on a posting made by a Christian, and while talking to a Christian? Seems that an awful lot of people who become outraged by things like Christmas, the Ten Commandments, the Pledge of Allegiance, roadside crosses to mark fatal crash sites, and so on, rant about theists. Why do they do that, when they are clearly angered at displays of Christianity? Why not just come out and say they hate the religion that has sparked their outrage and disgust? Why not have the guts to just come out and say it? When I’m talking about 9/11, I don’t blame “theists” for the terrorist attack, after all. :confused:

It is also worth noting that when called on it, these people will say that they hate all people of faith (and state it like they deserve a medal for doing so). Really? That is not, in my experience, the case. “Theist” haters will come up with pictures of lions eating Christians and say they are funny, but where are the “funny” pictures of Jews being gassed and thrown into Nazi ovens, or Buddhist monks on fire? They’ll draw every blasphemous depiction of Christ they can imagine, but where are the allegedly humorous cartoons of Anne Frank being murdered, or Muslim women being stoned to death, or Tibetan Buddhist nuns being raped? If they actually do hate all theists, then shouldn’t these things be just as amusing to them as the crucifixion of Jesus?

:shrug: So I made a stamp. Not a very special stamp, but there you go. We all suffer from selective outrage, I suppose, and this deviation is about that: in this case, the hatred liberals have for Christianity over all other religions, and their bizarre (cowardly?) penchant for denying it. I’ll preemptively say that fine, not all liberals hate Jesus, that some enlightened people really do despise all forms of faith, and so on. I’m not seeking confrontation in posting this, but as it was spawned from a confrontation caused by my defense of my faith, I suppose I should expect some. Again, :shrug:.

If anybody actually wants to use this stamp, please do, but also tell me so I can give you a :highfive:.

Show post
Liz Crokin #conspiracy rightwingwatch.org

Last week, right-wing “journalist” and Trump–worshiping conspiracy theorist Liz Crokin posted a video on her YouTube channel in which she suggested that she was beginning to lose faith in the QAnon conspiracy theory and its associated movement, declaring that if the long-promised wave of mass arrests of elite satanic pedophiles doesn’t happen by the end of 2019, then she is going to “have to bow out” of the movement and focus her attention elsewhere.

As we noted, Crokin has long been one of the most ardent proponents of the QAnon conspiracy theory, which asserts that the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election is really just a cover for a plan orchestrated by President Trump to take down a global satanic pedophile ring involving countless political, economic, and cultural leaders. A central component of this conspiracy theory is that once everything is in place, Trump will unleash a wave of mass arrests in which high-profile figures like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and others will be rounded up, tried by military tribunals, and executed.

But as the weeks and months have passed without any such arrests taking place, Crokin has begun to lose faith in QAnon, which appears to be giving rise to a new and worrisome development as she is now suggesting that fed up QAnon followers may begin to take matters into their own hands.

Appearing recently on “The SGT Report,” Crokin all but begged Q to produce just one arrest “so that we know we’re moving in the right direction,” warning that if arrests don’t start to happen soon, QAnon followers might resort to vigilante justice.

“[The arrests] need to happen this year,” she said. “If they don’t happen before 2020, President Trump is going to lose support. He promised that he would take Hillary Clinton down. He said that he would assign a special prosecutor to investigate her crimes. We haven’t forgotten. We want to see justice for real criminals. We know these people are torturing children, they’re raping kids, they’re ripping their body parts apart, they’re selling the organs on the black market. They are doing to most horrific crimes against humanity on children and it’s unacceptable and President Trump needs to make sure that his DOJ goes after the real criminals.”

“They need to do it before 2020 because I believe if he doesn’t, then he’s going to lose support and people are just going to get fed up and, honestly, people are going to start taking to the streets,” Crokin warned. “I’m ready now to physically go to John Podesta’s house and drag him out of his house.”

“I’m all for citizen’s arrests at this point,” responded the host of the program.

“So am I,” said Crokin. “This has dragged on for too long. We need to start seeing arrests of the real criminals and I just pray to God that they happen really soon because if they don’t, I think that so much is coming out about the sex trafficking, what they do to kids, [that] we are going to start seeing vigilante justice and that could get really dangerous and that could cause a civil war in this country.”

Show post
bill-11b.tumblr.com #fundie bill-11b.tumblr.com

on the murder of British politician Jo Cox

Golly, gee, oh my, what a shame.
Karma in fucking action. If only Americans had the balls to do the same thing.

[ Bill I understand where you’re coming from, but perhaps a less aggressive approach might make people more sympathetic towards your views, especially in a situation where someone has been killed ]

Except, I don’t give shit about people’s sympathies.
Every dead cultural Marxist is a win in my book.
Of course the left will stand atop her corpse and call everyone who disagrees with them a bloodthirsty savage (unlike the actual bloodthirsty savages they’re in favor of invading their country) but they’d do that anyhow, now they just have the corps to stand on.

[ What the actual fuck is wrong with you?? Oh yeah, kill everyone who disagrees with you. That’s real fucking smart.
Well, it certainly seems to silence the opposition.
]

Your king and my congress disagreed on tax rates… guess why we no longer have a king, and you still do.

Show post
Unknown CPC officials #fundie independent.co.uk

One million Chinese people 'move into Muslim homes to report on Islamic or unpatriotic beliefs'

'Had a Uighur host just greeted a neighbour in Arabic with the words ‘Assalamu Alaykum’? That would need to go in the notebook," says Dr Darren Byler

Uninvited, more than one million Han Chinese people have reportedly moved into the homes of Uighur Muslim families to report on whether they display Islamic or unpatriotic beliefs.

Sent to homes in Xinjiang province by the Chinese government, American anthropologist Darren Byler said they were tasked with watching for signs that their hosts’ attachment to Islam might be “extreme”.

The informants, who describe themselves as "relatives" of the families they are staying with, are said to have received specific instructions on how to get them to let their guard down.

As devout Muslims would refuse cigarettes and alcohol. this is seen as one way of finding out whether they were extreme.

“Had a Uighur host just greeted a neighbour in Arabic with the words ‘Assalamu Alaykum’? That would need to go in the notebook,” said Dr Byler, in research published by Asia Society's Centre on US-China Relations. “Was that a copy of the Quran in the home? Was anyone praying on Friday or fasting during Ramadan? Was a little sister’s dress too long or a little brother’s beard irregular?”

As many as a million Uighurs are thought to have been rounded up and placed in "re-education’ centres", in what China claims is a clampdown on religious extremism.

Those who have spent time in them, have however claimed that they were forced to undergo an intensive indoctrination programme, urged to renounce Islam and instead heap praise on the Chinese Communist Party.

One former inmate claimed Muslim inmates were forced to eat pork and drink alcohol.

Dr Byler said more than a million Chinese civilians, who refer to themselves as "relatives", were assigned to the homes of Muslims for a series of week-long stays in 2017.

His claim appeared to be confirmed in the Communist Party's official newspaper, the People's Daily, which reported that more than 1.1 million people paired up with 1.69 million ethnic minority citizens in China by the end of September this year.

They often focus on families of those who have been detained in the "re-education" centres.

China was also said to be trying to prevent people from fasting during Ramadan in Xinjiang last year.

According to the World Uighur Congress (WUC), officials in the region ordered all restaurants to remain open and a series of measures were put in place seemingly designed to prevent people observing the holy month.

Chinese authorities have also been accused of putting Uighur children and those from other ethnic minority groups into state-run orphanages across the western Xinjiang region, even if their parents were not dead, as some one million adults in their families were sent to internment camps.

Dilxat Raxit, of the exile World Uighur Congress, has also claimed officials in Xinjiang warned them that they must surrender religious items such as the Quran or face “harsh punishments”.

Show post
Angelica Zambrano #fundie christiscoming777.com

LATINA POPSTAR SELENA IN FLAMES

The Lord told me there were many famous people in Hell, and also many people who had known about the Lord. He said, “I am going to show you another part of the furnace.” We came to a place where a woman was surrounded by flames. She was in great torment and would scream, begging the Lord for mercy. Jesus pointed to her with his hand and told me, “Daughter, that woman that you see over there, surrounded by flames, is Selena.” As we started getting closer, she screamed, “Lord, have mercy on me, forgive me Lord, take me out of this place!” But the Lord looked at her and said, “It’s late, it’s too late. You cannot repent now.”

She saw me and said, “Please, I beg you, go tell people about this, please speak out and do not be silent; go and tell them not to come to this place; go and tell them not to listen to my songs, nor sing my songs.” (1 John 2:15) So I asked her, “Why do you want me to go and say that?” And she answered, “Because every time people sing and listen to my songs, I am tormented even more, the person who does this, who sings and listens to my songs, is walking to this place. Please, go tell them not to come here; go tell them that hell is real!” She would scream and demons would hurl spears from afar into her body and she would cry, “Help me, Lord, have mercy on me, Lord!” But sadly, the Lord told her, “It is too late.”
I looked all over that area, it was full of singers and artists who have died. All they did was sing and sing, they wouldn’t stop singing. The Lord explained, “Daughter, the person who is here, must continue doing here, whatever they did on Earth, if they had not repented.” ((TAKE HEED of this warning regarding worldly music and throw it away!!))

THE UNREPENTANT

As I was observing the area, I noticed a lot of demons that were spilling down some type of rain. I actually thought it was raining. But I noticed the people in flames running away from the rain and shouting, “No, help me, Lord!…No, this can’t be,” and the demons would laugh and tell the people, “Praise and worship because this is your kingdom forever and ever!” I saw the flames increase and people’s worms would multiply! There was no water there, it was brimstone that would multiply the flames and increase each person’s anguish. I asked Jesus, “What’s happening?…Lord, what is this?” The Lord replied, “This is the wages of anyone who has not repented.” (Psalms 11:6)

A POPE IN HELL

Then the Lord took me to place where there was a very well-known man. Before now, I used to live as a double minded young Christian girl. I used to think that any person that died would go to Heaven; that those who celebrated mass, would also go to heaven, but I was wrong. When Pope John Paul II died, my friends and relatives would tell me that he had gone to heaven. All the news on TV, on Extraand many other places would say, “Pope John Paul II has died, may he rest in peace. He is now rejoicing with the Lord and his angels in heaven” and I believed all of it. But I was only fooling myself, because I saw him in Hell, being tormented by flames. I looked at his face, it was John Paul II! The Lord said to me, “Look, Daughter, that man that you see there, is Pope John Paul II. He is here in this place; he is being tormented because he did not repent.”

But I asked, “Lord, why is he here? He used to preach at church.” Jesus replied, “Daughter, no fornicator, no idolater, no one who is greedy and no liar will inherit My Kingdom.”(Eph. 5:5) I replied, “Yes, I know that is true, but I want to know why he is here, because he used to preach to multitudes of people!” And Jesus responded, “Yes, Daughter, he may have said many things, but he would never speak the truth as it is. He never said the truth and they know the truth and although he knew the truth, he preferred money over preaching about salvation. He would not offer reality; would not say that hell is real and that heaven also exists; Daughter, now he is here in this place.”

When I looked at this man, he had a large serpent with needles, wrapped around his throat, and he would try to take it off. I pleaded with Jesus, “Lord, help him!” The man would scream, “Help me, Lord; have mercy on me; take me out of this place; forgive me! I repent, Lord; I want to return to Earth, I want to go back to Earth to repent.” The Lord observed him and said to him, “You very well knew. You knew very well that this place was real…It’s too late; there is no other opportunity for you.”
The Lord said, “Look, Daughter, I am going to show you the life of this man.” Jesus showed me a huge screen on which I could observe how this man offered mass many times to the multitudes. And how the people who were there were so idolatrous. Jesus said, “Look, Daughter, there are many idolaters in this place. Idolatry will not save, Daughter. I am the only One who saves, and outside of Me, no one saves. I love the sinner, but I hate sin, Daughter. Go and tell humanity that I love them and that they need to come to Me.”

As the Lord was speaking, I began to see how this man received multitudes of coins and bills; money, all of which he would keep. He had so much money. I saw images of this man seated on a throne, but I was also able to see beyond that. While it’s true that these people do not get married, I can assure you, I’m not making this up, the Lord showed it to me, those people do sleep with nuns; with many women there! [1 example]

The Lord showed me these people living in fornication, and the Word says that no fornicator will inherit His Kingdom. As I was watching all of this, the Lord told me, “Look Daughter, all of this which I am showing you is what goes on, what he lived and what keeps on happening among many people, among many priests and popes existing.” Then he told me, “Daughter, go and tell humanity that it’s time to turn to Me.”

Show post
Bill Wiese #fundie jesuschristthewaythetruthandthelife.wordpress.com

During the next year, there were times when I would get irritated with people who say they don’t believe in Jesus, heaven, or hell. When you know the truth, you want so desperately to convince others that hell is real and that Jesus is their only way out. Sometimes I would simply run short of patience, because I know where they are going if they don’t listen. It is not just that I am anxious to talk to others because of my experience—it’s also because of what God says in His Word. That is what counts. I do not get upset at the people themselves but at how hard it is to persuade them of the truth.

“It is our bounden duty to warn sinners of their fearful peril. To remain silent is criminal.”[12]

—A. W. Pink

To give an analogy, try to imagine how you would feel if you were sitting beside a pool and saw a tanker truck pull up with some evil-looking men in it. The men got out of the truck and began to drain the pool water to about half-full. Then they filled it back up with another liquid from the large truck. However, it’s not water—it’s acid! You watch the men throw a wooden board into the pool, and the board immediately disintegrates. Obviously, these men are planning on killing whoever jumps into the seemingly harmless pool.

Then the men drive away. A few minutes later, some children come running up to the pool to swim. You immediately scream and warn them of the acid in the water, but they don’t believe you. You desperately yell, telling them to stay out of the pool. However, the water looks great to them—it’s inviting. How frustrated you would be! You couldn’t let them jump in, even if they insisted. You would feel compelled to do whatever it took to save them.

Show post
Anarchist rioters #fundie facebook.com

[Berkeley, California riot]

I am livid tonight by what I’m seeing on the Cal campus.

Protests turned violent this evening because of a planned talk by a guy named Milo Yiannopoulos.

But what really makes me angry is that at one point so called anarchists showed up and attacked one of our reporters.

Don’t worry she’s okay.
I'll explain what happened to her in a moment.

The speaker Milo Yiannnopoulos is very controversial.
He says a lot of things that are designed to provoke.
Other would say his words are designed to hurt.

Protesters wanted to keep him from speaking this evening and they were successful.
His speech was cancelled because of the violence.

I find it ironic that Cal was at the forefront of the free speech movement back in the 60s.

Yet tonight the protest at Cal kept someone from exercising his right to free speech.
Just because they “disagree” with what he’s saying.

(For the record I'm in no way trying to defend what he says I'm only trying to defend his right to say it)

It appears that everything went to hell when the anarchists arrived.
They were the ones dressed in black with hoodies and masks on their faces.

Breanna Simmons messaged me and said:

"I'm a student protestor who was there.
It was completely peaceful until a group of people in black masks showed up.
It was them who started throwing rocks/eggs/fireworks and were breaking windows."

And those so called anarchists came prepared.
One even had a makeshift shield.

They picked up police barricades and used them as battering rams to break windows.

They also set a portable light and generator on fire.

And at one point they attacked our reporter Debora Villalon.
They threw a paint ball at her covering her with red paint.
She says it was pretty scary.

They also pepper sprayed a young woman giving an interview to a local TV station.
And I've seen what pepper spray can do.
It's not pretty.

I’d like to know what makes those protesters/anarchists think that doing that is okay?

I’d like to know what gives THEM the right to break windows and throw paint on one of our reporters.

Make no mistake.
I have no issues with protests.

I grew up in Berkeley.
I marched in anti-Vietnam war protests during the 60’s.

But I draw the line when it comes to violence.
And I especially draw the line when they attack one of our reporters.
Or pepper spray a young woman giving an interview.

Quite frankly I think that’s disgusting.

Show post
Article "Dating advice from women" #fundie en.kingswiki.com

Dating advice from women is generally considered to be low-quality. RichieP writes, "Girls aren't incentivized to give honest dating advice. Their goal is to screen for guys who actually have X,Y,Z desirable qualities, not tell everyone how to mimic X,Y,Z desirable qualities. It's like an interviewer telling you exactly what he looks for in an interview. Won't happen, because it makes it easier to fake."[1] Winston Smith writes that "the internet abounds with female dating coaches and advice columnists who presume to tell men how to attract and please women. None of them have ever done this themselves, and it’s no coincidence that their advice is almost universally worthless."[2]

Show post
The Anti-Gnostic #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

*On the US Senate Elections*

So far, Georgia’s 58% native-born statehouse just scrawls in “Republican” five minutes after the polls close and that’s that. I don’t know for how much longer. I can only pray we at least get enough upper-tier mestizos who really do pay comp premiums and taxes.

I swear the phenotypes are getting so exotic around here I’m expecting to see bones thru people’s noses.

Show post
Allan Keyes #fundie wnd.com

“It’s déjà vu all over again.” In an article at LifesiteNews.com, I read that, in response to the referendum in Ireland favoring homosexual “marriages,” Walter Kasper, a German cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church, said: “A democratic state has the duty to respect the will of the people; and it seems clear that, if the majority of the people wants such homosexual unions, the state has a duty to recognize such rights.” So if the people of Germany voted tomorrow to renew the Holocaust, would the cardinal say the German state is duty-bound to re-open the death camps? That kind of spurious legalism helped goose-step Germany into Hell in the last century. Do German cardinals now propose to do the same to the Roman Catholic Church in this one?

[...]

Surely misleading millions of people into mortal sin will be a spiritual holocaust, with quite possibly eternal consequences. Does Cardinal Kasper think those spiritually deadly consequences are unreal? We learn from another Lifesitenews report that one of Cardinal Kasper’s liberal co-conspirators, Cardinal Reinhard Marx, is “well-known for his support for the ‘Kasper agenda’ and a prominent defender of the ‘value’ of homosexual unions.” Of course, the term “value” is valueless except in the context of some standard of judgment. Given the Catholic Church’s reliance upon natural law as an expression of God’s will, it’s reasonable to assume that both these cardinals still uphold that standard.

So what value does God assign to homosexual relations? For males, the Old Testament scroll of the law calls such relations an abomination (Leviticus 20:13). That term suggests a negative value, as does the death penalty the Torah prescribes for homosexual behavior.

[...]

Finally, when he asserts that it is right to follow the majority’s will when they purport to approve as lawful what God condemns as odious under the law, Cardinal Kasper is following the trendy idolatry of self-willed freedom, wrongfully abused, that now defames the name of right. By doing so, he casts away God’s standard of natural right. And he accepts an understanding of sovereignty that even pagan philosophers rejected. A sovereign act must always take account of the common good. When that good is not being respected, sovereign authority is not in play.

In such a circumstance, the will that purports to wield the sovereign power is not an exercise of sovereign right. It is a wrongful abuse of power that people of good will have, in principle, a duty to resist, not to obey. And this is true whether the specious exercise of sovereignty is that of the Irish people, the U.S. Supreme Court or the people of the United States, however assembled.

Show post
Kevin Swanson #fundie rightwingwatch.org

The organizer of the “National Religious Liberties Conference” in Des Moines, Iowa, announced today that Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee and Bobby Jindal have committed to speaking at the summit, which will take place next month. -
Kevin Swanson, the conference’s chief organizer, is a far-right pastor and host of the “Generations Radio” program, on which he has frequently claimed that the government should put gay people to death, warned that the Girl Scouts and the movie “Frozen” turn girls into lesbians and blamed natural disasters on gay people and women who wear pants.

Swanson on homosexuality: Boycotts Girl Scout cookies because they “promote lesbianism” and “I don’t want my little girl turning into a lesbian.” Discussed whether the Rose Bowl should include a float where a gay person is stoned to death. Lamented that these days country singer Kacey Musgraves wasn’t lynched for her “promotion of homosexuality” through song. Urged people to hold up signs telling gay couples to die on their wedding day. Defended a Ugandan measure to make homosexuality a criminal offense punishable by life imprisonment or the death penalty, saying he was glad the country was “standing strong” by adopting extreme anti-gay laws. Agreed that gay marriage is like the Sandy Hook school massacre. Wanted America to have anti-gay laws “much like what the Pilgrims had” (the Pilgrims believed that homosexuality should be punishable by death, banishment and whippings) and enforce biblical law “that says that homosexuals should be put to death.” Explained that “a Christian perspective ultimately brought the death penalty upon homosexuality.”

Swanson on pop culture: “Frozen” is a demonic movie meant to “indoctrinate my five-year-old to be a lesbian.” Beyoncé is possessed by demons. Mark Twain was possessed by demons. The Beatles spread a “demonic approach to things.” Dumbledore encourages pedophilia. Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus and Katy Perry sing “demon songs.” Katniss Everdeen is a “little girl anarchist.” Halloween is a celebration of the victims of Noah’s flood. William Shakespeare ruined America by planting the “seedbeds for homosexual themes and homosexual behavior.”

Show post
Jon Rappoport #conspiracy jonrappoport.wordpress.com

"Logic students used to learn: you can have a perfectly valid argument, even if your premises, your first assumptions are completely false. Well, if the argument is about politics, your conclusion will be insane. Implementing the conclusion will earn you praise as you destroy lives. What we’re talking about here is a species of mind control.” ](The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

What’s the latest solution to the virus that causes nothing?

Here we go.

Punch line: MIT Technology Review, 2/8/16: “We have the technology to destroy all Zika mosquitoes.”

“A controversial genetic technology able to wipe out the mosquito carrying the Zika virus will be available within months, scientists say.

“The technology, called a ‘gene drive,’ was demonstrated only last year in yeast cells, fruit flies, and a species of mosquito that transmits malaria. It uses the gene-snipping technology CRISPR to force a genetic change to spread through a population as it reproduces.

“Three U.S. labs that handle mosquitoes, two in California and one in Virginia, say they are already working toward a gene drive for Aedes aegypti, the type of mosquito blamed for spreading Zika. If deployed, the technology could theoretically drive the species to extinction. (emphasis added)

“’We could have it easily within a year,’ says Anthony James, a molecular biologist at the University of California, Irvine.

“Any release of a gene drive in the wild would be hotly debated by ecologists…But with Zika sowing fear across Latin America and beyond, the technology is likely to get a closer look. ‘Four weeks ago we were trying to justify why we are doing this. Now they’re saying “Get the lead out,”’ says James. ‘It’s absolutely going to change the conversation.’”

No kidding.

Unforeseen consequences? Unpredicted results? Ecological domino effect? Transfer of genes from mosquitoes to humans? Don’t be silly. All is well. Don’t worry, be happy. Move straight ahead with your mouth shut and your eyes closed.

In previous articles, I’ve been reviewing the basics of covert ops, because Zika fits the bill. In this case, take a virus that causes nothing, falsely link it to a tragic condition (babies born with small heads and brain damage), and then slide in the real agendas. I’ve already spelled out some of those plans, which are materializing in front of our eyes.

Gene editing is a towering plan: technocrats don’t like a species—wipe it out.

Build up the threat with lies and obfuscations and false science and wall-to-wall propaganda—then introduce the grand solution.

Depopulation turns out to be easy. Just reconfigure genes. Snip-snip.

The Zika virus isn’t “sowing fear,” as the MIT Review claims. The World Health Organization is inventing that fear. In the 70 years since Zika was discovered, it has, at worst, caused mild transient illness. Now, suddenly, it’s supposed to be creating radical birth defects. Of course, the Brazilian researchers can only find a possible correlation between Zika and the birth defect in 17 cases. Seventeen. Maybe.

But never mind. Wipe out all the mosquitoes that may be carrying Zika. Wipe out the whole species.

And come to think of it, could a case be made that certain human populations are destructive and, well, superfluous? There are people who think so. They also think that, in the onrush of automation and AI, efficient robots could replace those useless populations.

Face it. Despite all the warnings about viruses running out of control and wiping out half the world, the depopulation freaks just haven’t been able to put a dent in the global population. They hope, they pray, but no dice.

However, they have been able to produce one result: planting fear of viruses in humans. They’re adequate to that task. So wake up and smell the cover story.

“In order to destroy the imminent threat of viruses and save the human race, we must turn to cutting-edge technology: gene editing. That’s our ultimate hope.”

Destroy the village in order to save it.

Here are the final paragraphs of the MIT article:

“But a gene drive [gene editing] can also make mosquito populations disappear. The simplest way to do that is to spread a genetic payload that leads to only male offspring. As the ‘male-only’ instructions spread with each new generation, eventually there would be no females left, says Adelman. His lab discovered the Aedes aegypti gene that determines sex only last spring. The next step will be to link it to a gene drive.

“Kevin Esvelt, a gene-drive researcher at MIT’s Media Lab who has been outspoken about the need to proceed cautiously, also thinks Aedes aegypti eradication should be the goal, so long as the public is onboard and the safety of the idea proved.

“’Technologically, we could probably do it in a couple of years,’ says Esvelt. ‘I’m sure we’ll be able to do it before people can agree if we should.’”

Did you get that last piece? The “cautious” scientist says: what the hell, let’s eliminate a whole species if “the public is onboard” and we prove it’s safe.

How to prove safety before launch? Hard to say. Basically, try it and then we’ll know. Vote for the bill and then you can read what’s in it. Allow a global explosion of GMO crops based on zero science about health and economic consequences, and see what happens. Expand the list of mandated vaccines for children from six to 60 and see what happens. Spray poisonous pesticides all over the planet and see what happens.

Only cranks and conspiracists and rubes and yokels and Luddites and tree huggers and bitter clingers oppose the march of science. How about editing their genes? It would make things so much easier.

Wipe out the mosquitoes. One small step for man, one giant step for mankind. Today, the mosquito, tomorrow the (fill in the blank).

The mind plays tricks:

“Listen, we’re not talking about depopulation in general. Don’t be silly. We’re just going to wipe out one species of very troublesome insect that’s wreaking havoc. Come on. It’s just once. We’ll never do it again. We’re not crazy. We’re researchers. Just give us a chance. Please. We want to launch the experiment and watch it with joy. That’s what we do. Just once. It’s our present under the Xmas tree.”

Why not? All you have to do is forget the giant clue that’s clubbing you on the head:

The virus they’re going to stop causes nothing.

What are they counting on? They’re counting on you not being able to believe the virus causes nothing. They’re betting on that.

They’re betting you’re in the trance they created.

Show post
Mitchel Townsend #conspiracy chronline.com

Bigfoot Enthusiast to Offer New Spring Class at Centralia College
‘The Old Ones, the First Americans’: Course Builds on his Bigfoot Research, Incorporates Stones He Found Depicting the Creature

image
Mitchel Townsend, a part-time volunteer educator at Centralia College, shows off what he believes is prehistoric artwork on a rock that depicts bigfoot.

A new class at Centralia College taught by a part-time volunteer instructor will further build on his claims that he discovered scientific evidence that proves bigfoot’s existence.

Mitchel Townsend, with the college’s department of continuing and community education, will feature some of his new archeological discoveries that include hybrid hominin art and stone carvings.

The rocks found locally at a location Townsend would not disclose are similar to that of Solutrean art — prehistoric art from the paleolithic times found in France. The artwork shows there was an advanced society in Lewis County over 20,000 years ago with culture and religion, according to Townsend.

The pictures on the rocks, which still need to be carbon dated, include elephants, bears and what he describes as a hybrid hominin in a similar pose to the Patterson-Gimlin film, which shows an unidentified subject thought to be bigfoot.

The stone carvings still need to be examined in an academic environment. Townsend has done a preliminary data analysis but plans to wait for the material to be peer reviewed since he has not yet finished a scientific paper that adequately describes his newest findings.

The class will marry bigfoot into the Solutrean art, Townsend said, claiming it shows that “bigfoot had to be an important part of their society.”

According to Townsend, the class will try to identify “the very first Americans through Native American legends, new scientific theories about population migration and his own multidisciplinary independent research.”

Townsend said the ancient native North Americans had identified a primitive culture of people that predated their arrival on the Bering Sea Land Bridge. He said there are remarkable consistencies with the recorded descriptions of the people’s cultural traditions, arts and traditions, and the stones he discovered.

In 2015, Townsend released the first of a series of three scientific papers that described his findings of three separate deer and elk bone piles that had giant hominin teeth marks. Townsend concluded the human-like teeth imprints, accompanied by footsteps with a length of 16 inches, belong to a creature like bigfoot who shares the genetic makeup of Native Americans and an ape.

Townsend has presented his forensic dental impression signature analysis research at various conferences including the annual Anthropological Research Conference in Tacoma. He also presented the research at the Sasquatch Summits and the International Bigfoot Conference. The response from the conferences led him to submit his most recent version of his papers to the Journal of Archaeological Science/Reports, one of the top archaeological research journals in the world.

“To this day our research stands intact,” Townsend said. “Not one scientist has been able to refute our conclusions in any category. The integrated and mutually supporting nature of the evidence and analysis is clear, repeatable and microscopically impossible to fake or hoax.”

Townsend will provide the material, his analysis or his new archaeological discoveries to anyone who wants to analyze them.

He has authored a textbook titled “Bigfoot Solved, Hybrid Hominin,” which was released in February and is available on Amazon. The book consolidates his scientific papers.

Show post
Amos Moses #fundie disqus.com

Sally Edwards:
This isn't about denying a creator, it's about there being nothing about transgenderism in the Bible. And there isn't.

Amos Moses:
WOW .... because i have been in NUMEROUS conversations right here on this forum ..... where it was claimed that it DOES ...... so which is wrong ..... YOU ..... or the "TRANSGENDERED" person i had the conversations with .......... do tell ..... which of you is a liar ............

Sally Edwards:
Look Amos, it isn’t hard. Either present me with scripture that specifically addresses transgenderism or admit it does not appear anywhere in the Bible. And invite anyone you know to do the same.

Amos Moses:
as i said .... AGAIN .....i have been in NUMEROUS conversations right here on this forum ..... WITH "TRANSGENDERED" PERSONS ...... or so they claim .......... where THEY claimed that it DOES appear in scripture ...... and that it is NOT a SIN ........ so are YOU ..... or the "TRANSGENDERED" person i had the conversations with LYING .......... do tell ..... which of you is a liar .............. YOU are on the "TRANSGENDERED" side of this issue ..... your position is DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED to their position ...... you both CANNOT be telling the truth ....... so ..... AGAIN ...... which of you IS LYING .....

Sally Edwards:
So you can't name the scripture. Consider the matter settled. Thank you.

Amos Moses:
MATTHEW 19 ........ that is the scripture they used .............. so WHICH OF YOU IS LYING ..... the "transgendered" person OR YOU ...........
OR since they are saying it does talk about them and that it is not sin and YOU are saying it does not talk about them .... YOU are calling them LIARS ..............
do i understand your position correctly ............ those "transgendered" persons LIED .........

Sally Edwards:
I don't care who used it. It doesn't say transgendered or specifically refer to them. They are wrong and so are you.

Amos Moses:
so when it says ..........
19:11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
that is not them ...... and YOU are calling THEM LIARS ............ and they are wrong and you are right ..... WHY .............

Sally Edwards:
Eunuchs are not transgendered people. That's why.

Amos Moses:
WHY .... who says ... YOU say so ..... WHY .... what are YOUR qualifications to make that judgement ...... those "transgenders" are reading the exact same text ...... what makes you smarter than them ...... are YOU a "transgender" ..........

Sally Edwards:
Because they're not transgendered people, Amos. They have entirely different definitions. Do you know what a transgendered person is? Maybe you don't and that explains why you're so unsympathetic to them. A eunuch is a sexless person. A transgendered person still has a gender.

Amos Moses:
they were TRANSGENDERED persons saying that ... are you calling them stupid ...... that they do not know what they read and they do not know WHAT they are .... YOU are SMARTER than they are as to WHAT THEY ARE ............. ARE YOU SERIOUS ............. and then YOU have the temerity to say " Do you know what a transgendered person is?" .... are you saying THEY do not know ...............

Sally Edwards:
In the first place I'm sure they didn't say that, I think you're probably misquoting them. Secondly it's not a difficult concept, the idea of transgenderism is relatively new, and so it could not possibly have appeared in the Bible.

Show post
Henry Ford Was Right! #conspiracy realjewnews.com

Trump is letting down his base by being the Neocons puppet.

Everybody’s sick of these Rothschild-Rockefeller evil and corrupt bogus wars.

I predicted Trumpberg would be a GW Bush 2.0 and I’ll probably be right. Although, the Ziobeast 666 grid is trying to run him out like they did Nixon.

It’s too bad none of these guys won’t just stand up and red pill the masses from their position of influence, but yeah looking at USSA history that doesn’t seem too likely.

Show post
Deedee #fundie venganza.org

I don’t care who you are, or what the f*** you’re
thinking, but if that CRAP shows up in our school
systems, my girls will NOT GO TO SCHOOL! Jesus Christ
is our Lord and Saviour, and I hope for the sake of
your soals that you wise up and get back to the REAL truth!

GOD BLESS
LOVE DEEDEE

Show post
Carl Paladino #racist rawstory.com

Trump campaign honorary co-chair Carl Paladino on Monday suggested that the presumptive GOP nominee was a victim of anti-white racism because the media “always pushes back on the white guy.”

Paladino began his interview with CNN’s Carol Costello by attacking the media for reporting on Donald Trump’s comments about U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s Hispanic heritage.

“The press has created this issue,” Paladino insisted.

“Because it sounds racist, that’s why,” Costello immediately shot back.

“Well, it sounds racist because in your vernacular, okay, that’s what you’re trying to prove,” Paladino opined. “What is the press interested in doing right now? They’ve got their jockey shorts all bunched up, and they’re all excited over having an issue that they can pick apart in its most minute sense.”

The CNN host pointed out that conservative blogger Erick Erickson had accused his own party of “entertaining a racist as its leader in the name of winning.”

Paladino, who has his own history of making controversial racial statements, accused Erickson of liking “to use the term ‘racist’.”

“This is incredible that you want to pull this word out and use it,” the Trump surrogate complained. “Because it always pushes back on the white guy. It’s not fair.”

“This is the real world and in the real world you have considerations like that when you look at, ‘Why am I getting sued?'” he added. “The press constantly wants to identify what the issues of the day are, you don’t have that right.”

“[Donald Trump] is the one that has to define what the issues of the day are, not the press. You don’t have a right to do that.”

Show post
Ken Ham #fundie answersingenesis.org

[ "Noah wouldn’t have had the adequate tools" [to build his ark]]

Besides the fact that we don’t know what tools Noah had, we point out that many people wittingly or unwittingly have an evolutionary view (or evolutionary-influenced view) of history. Many think Noah must have been some primitive person maybe using primitive stone tools. When God made man, man was obviously highly intelligent. Genesis 4:21 tell us that within a few generations people were making musical instruments. By the time of Noah, and with people living for hundreds of years before the Flood, who knows what sort of knowledge was accumulated and the kind of sophisticated technology that was developed? Noah may have had tools and other impressive technology that we would be jealous of! And remember, we don’t know how ancient people built many of the stone structures in South America or even the remarkably constructed Egyptian pyramids. The ancients obviously had a technology we just aren’t aware of, as it seems no record was kept or the records were destroyed. In this area of ancient technologies, we need to think in terms of a Christian worldview based on the history in the Bible.

[Emphasis added]

Show post
Jason G #fundie theologyweb.com

A common atheistic device is to list aberrant scholars that are so liberal that they don’t really believe the Bible (or know the Bible) and use their statements to help their cases.

Show post
Ken Ham #fundie answersingenesis.org

Arkophobia

We’ve all heard of the word arachnophobia, a fear of spiders and other arachnids such as scorpions. Well, there is a new phobia showing up on countless blogs, on Twitter, and in news sources. And it has a similar-sounding name: Arkophobia. It’s a fear of the life-size Ark we are building in Williamstown, Kentucky, that opens July 7.

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines a phobia as “an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.”

Well, the Arkophobia we see all around us is certainly “illogical.” But it’s actually not “inexplicable.” Let me explain.

Arkophobia hit an all-time high the week of January 25. That’s when a federal judge issued a major ruling that gave a huge win to Answers in Genesis in our religious freedom lawsuit against the State of Kentucky and the actions of the previous governor, Steve Beshear.

The judge ruled that Kentucky could not deny the Ark project participation in the state’s tourism tax incentive program. Such a denial would be discriminatory based on the US Constitution and its First Amendment. The judge also ruled in accord with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title VII of that act, confirming that, as a religious organization, AiG can use religious preferences in Ark hiring.

image

Creation Wise: Ark Danger

Well, that federal decision was too much for the secularist/atheist bloggers. That’s when Arkophobia was at its height. Many secularists were already livid that a Christian organization is building such a massive tourist facility that will have a huge impact in the culture as it proclaims a Christian message! They just can’t stand it! Their hatred against Christianity was so clear after the ruling.

In bemoaning the judge’s decision, one atheist blogger mocked:

"In case you don’t know, Ken Ham is building a big boat in Kentucky and planning to tell people it’s a replica of Noah’s Ark. This, he believes, will make people want to become Christians and stop being gay. Ham’s God really likes spending millions of dollars on vanity woodwork projects but really hates people who love other people of the same gender.

Ham’s God is apparently ambivalent about giving some of those millions of dollars to those who most need it."

These hateful statements really help to reveal Arkophobia. What is the real reason for such vehement opposition to a project that will be so beneficial to the state as it brings hundreds of millions of tourist dollars into Kentucky for hotels, restaurants, and much more, and creates thousands of jobs? It’s because of the message of the Ark.

WHAT IS THE REAL REASON FOR SUCH VEHEMENT OPPOSITION TO THE ARK?
The opposition to the tax incentives, which are offered to any tourism project that will have a positive economic impact in Kentucky and create jobs (called a “neutral purpose”), is illogical. Furthermore, such censorship violates the US Constitution’s guarantee of the freedom of religion and its free exercise. The opposition we have been encountering is due to a heart issue.

Romans 3:23 teaches us that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” And Romans 3:10–18 states:

There is none righteous, no, not one; there is none who understands; there is none who seeks after God. They have all turned aside; they have together become unprofitable; there is none who does good, no, not one. Their throat is an open tomb; with their tongues they have practiced deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips; whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness. Their feet are swift to shed blood; destruction and misery are in their ways; and the way of peace they have not known. There is no fear of God before their eyes.

Victory in the Courts
In a major ruling, the federal judge confirmed that the 1964 Civil Rights Act allows AiG to use a religious preference in hiring.

The bottom line with the secularist opposition? Arkophobia is so widespread because “the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?” (Jeremiah 17:9). Secularists are in rebellion against their Creator. The fact that He has the right to tell them, through His Word, what is right (e.g., marriage is one man for one woman) and what is wrong (e.g., abortion is murder) angers them.

Secularists oppose the Ark because they are afraid of the Ark’s goal: to proclaim the everlasting gospel. Revelation 14:6–7 declares:

Then I saw another angel flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to those who dwell on the earth—to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people—saying with a loud voice, “Fear God and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment has come; and worship Him who made heaven and earth, the sea and springs of water.”

Find out more about the Ark Encounter outreach at ArkEncounter.com.

Show post
Rush Limbaugh #fundie huffingtonpost.com

The Regime, Hillary, Michelle Obama sympathize with Boko Haram. They’re blaming the Christian Nigerian government for creating Boko Haram, and they want to get rid of the Nigerian government, because if you do that, if you appease the terror group by getting rid of the group you think is responsible for their existence, then you’ve made peace with them.

Show post
Unknown author #sexist whatswrongwithequalrights.wordpress.com

Can I just say one thing? Ok, I hate the 1950s. seriously. I hate it that when I say that I believe in stuff like traditional gender roles and that I’ve always stayed home and stuff like that that people immediately start thinking “1950s.” Ugh. I hate that era. Personally, I see the 1950s as a time of female superiority if you want to know the truth about it. I actually think the era was quite feminist. It’s always been clear to me that both of my grandmothers were always “in charge” in their marriages. The 1950s weren’t traditional from my point of view. I mean, women were already voting and a lot of wives were already starting to join the workforce and stuff like that.

I don’t act like a 1950s housewife nor do I dress like one. Ok, well, I do kind of like stuff like vintage dresses and bikinis, but because I think they’re cute, not because I’ve got a thing for the 50s or anything like that. I used to have some vintage dresses but they fall off of me these days so I haven’t worn them in years. But, anyway, back to the subject. We’re not rich. My husband doesn’t “have money.” We’re just simple people, and I’m just a simple girl.

I know I’ve said it before, but when I say “housewife” I think a bit farther back to the times when husbands were actually in charge. I don’t think of high heels and perfectly permed hair so much as I think of bare feet, waist length hair (for a woman) and simplicity.

I also don’t like people that think housewives are somehow “lazy” or anything of the sort. I don’t sit around eating bon-bons all day, watching soap-operas, and writing “honey-do” lists while having an affair with the pool boy. I would also hate to think that a man only wanted to provide for me just because of the way I look. That’s why I would never want to be with a rich man, unless I knew in my heart that that man truly loved and cherished me for the long-term and would always do so.

My husband provides for me 100% financially speaking, as I believe it is his responsibility to do so, but he’s also in charge of everything too. For instance, he gave me a credit card on his account I could use for a while but then he took it away from me last year after I came back home. (He said it was because he got a new card, but I suspect the real reason was to take independence from me so I wouldn’t leave again. In either case, he never gave me another one.)

He gives me things I want and need, but he also has the power to say no to me or take them away from me too. And yes, I accept this even though I’ve suffered pain and frustration and I still accept it no matter what others might think about it, because it confers security on me and protects me. I’d rather accept this life than the life of the modern woman with all her unhappiness, unstable relationships and lack of ability to raise and care for her own children every day.

Show post
SGT #conspiracy sgtreport.com

CNN’s Jake Tapper (Jacob) Tapper (Tapperman) likes to malign #SpiritCooking and #PizzaGate as “fake news” without ever bothering to address any of the troubling FACTS and circumstantial evidence that suggest a penchant for pedophilia among the ranks of Washington DC’s elite.

It’s certainly a strange coincidence that almost a year ago (February 6, 2015) Tapper’s wife Jennifer professed her love for Comet Ping Pong and Buck’s Fishing and Camping, naming them specifically as her “favorite date-night restaurants”, which is weird because both establishments have been named by Pizzagate researchers as worthy of further investigation. And perhaps even stranger, Jennifer Tapper also told Washingtonian magazine that Comet Ping Pong is her “favorite restaurant with the kids.”

Small world. It kinda makes you wonder, just how close is Jake Tapper to John Podesta’s inner circle, and what exactly is lurking in his closet?

Show post
ACLJ.org #fundie aclj.org

Just like the well-practiced human ‘sacrificers’ of yore – like the Aztecs who brought their children for the appeasement of the gods – our culture too now sacrifices their children for the appeasement of the gods, all in the name of progressivism.

Show post
Subverted Nation #fundie subvertednation.net

We need to start a new program to combat communist jew gun control efforts. Many times their efforts consist of false flag shootings like Sandy Hook, followed by the jewish media screaming how we’ll never be safe as long as guns are around. In the near future, we will have a section where anti-gun jew fucks and their supporters can be exposed and properly ridiculed, until such time as they can face the consequences of their treason.

Recently a bunch of feminist jew cunts thought they would protest guns on campus by giving out dildos. They look like a bunch of dildos doing it, so let’s start with them. These dumb uneducated commie feminist infected pustules figured since dildos were banned on campus, but guns weren’t, they would protest by acting like whores and handing out dildos. They are flanked by feminized bitches with mustaches and beards that I won’t dare call “males”or “men”, but they dress like guys anyway. These freakish abominations have a name for their protest “Cocks not Glocks”. I guess even these guys like cocks. In the pictures they seem to enjoy playing with them way too much.

This is what you have to look forward to if you don’t stand and fight for freedom and righteousness. Your women will all be degraded to a pile of bottom feeding fake ass feminist tramps who will drop their pants to anyone. Your men will be girly little bitches who like sex with men, dogs, and children as much as they do a grown woman. To top it off, you’ll all be disarmed useless pussies crying in “safe zones” because your fake candidate lost a fake election that never happened. (oh yes, we’ll cover that soon too)

I’m not really mad though. Anyone that thinks handing out dildos to protest guns is funny needs shot, and the idea of that makes these whiny bitches mad. Wouldn’t that be ironic? Going before a firing squad for trying to ban guns? I think that is very fitting, but this article is Nooses for Gun Control so back to that.

These snakes always speak with a forked tongue. Remember, they walk among us, appealing to our sensibilities. There is a reason the Marcus Cicero quote has been displayed so long on the front of this site. An enemy at the gates is less formidable than one who pretends to be just another America with a differing view.

“I do believe in the second amendment and the right to own guns and bear arms, however I don’t think that public university is really the place for that,” said one commie lying fuck. This pile of shit doesn’t believe in the second amendment, or your right to defend yourself. She wants guns banned, and picking away at this little thing is her method of helping ban them.

This Hegelian dialect says one thing, then turns right around and says the other. People always ask me, “how do you know this/that”, and the answer is always the same. You need to listen to how someone says something, not what they are saying. This person above is saying she wants to ban guns, but only here and there. She “believes” in the second amendment, but that doesn’t mean she will let you have it. Even the commie jew professors were filing injunctions to stop people carrying firearms.

Anyway, let us get to the point. They want to give away dildos for gun control, we will give away free rides in a noose to all gun control proponents. Nooses for Gun Control will cover all the expenses. Rope. Trees or custom built gallows, and even a bucket to kick out from under them! Every expense will be spared to ensure the least amount of comfort, but any gun control nut wanting to show their psychotic little heads will get free rides. No questions asked. Bodies will be burned and the ashes spread to the four corners of the earth for good measure.

Listen folks. It is really this simple. The only reason for gun control is to make you easier to kill. Stop beating around the bush and acting like they give a fuck about your safety. The moment they have your guns, the open slaughter will commence. These people mean to kill anyone who resists their take over. If you’re confused as to what this will look like, have a look at this movie about the Katyn forest massacre.

Too many people want to argue the points on gun control. They want to break out all the statistics, and try to “win” an argument based on the truth. The truth they rely on is that gun control only causes more trouble, and the enemy will counter with appeals to emotion and cries about saving the children. This will go on for eternity, but slowly they will whittle away our gun rights to nothing if we continue to allow discussion. If I have to spell out how this is being done already, take a look at this current article HERE where Obama the dark skinned jew and Socialist Security criminal mob are making up their own “rules” to stop people from acquiring guns.

Rights are like facts. They aren’t up for discussion or debate. I seriously don’t care what whiny emotional bullshit they use. Rights aren’t something that can be debated, because they are set in stone. Anyone trying to debate your rights is your enemy. Nothing else needs said, but they will try!

There is nothing to argue with gun control. Anyone who wants you disarmed means you harm. Period. Taking guns makes people easy to kill, and serves absolutely no other purpose. Oh wait, it does make it impossible for you to fight back. Look at the draconian measures being treasonously imposed by the corporation posing as the legitimate government in Commifornia. These fools pick away at banning all kinds of things, including now magazine releases they call “bullet buttons”. These commie jew fucks even require background checks just to buy ammunition! Ask yourself who ever gave them that power? Some commerce clause? What?

This communist shit hole Commiefornia would be a great place to set up gallows to hang treasonous twits. By the way, under the definition of treason, almost anyone working in government can be hung until dead. They are literally aiding and abetting enemies of our country in the form of the private corporations they serve. There are NO legitimate “government” employees today. They all work for a private company, but we’ll cover that at another time.

Anyone who has any reason they want guns banned here or there, or blocked from carrying this way or that, or just doesn’t quite feel comfortable with people having guns or using them for whatever reason is already guilty of treason. Stop trying to discuss the finer points of gun control with people who want to take your guns, just so they can kill you with guns. Nobody gives a shit about statistics. They don’t matter. The only thing that matters is getting as many gun control nuts free rides in a noose as soon as possible.

From now on, when you enter a gun control conversation, it will go like this. The gun control freak will try to tug at people’s emotions, “those poor children that got shot in that school, we can never let this happen again”. Your reply will be, “You’re right! Gun control is a serious problem that can only be solved by judicious use of a noose!”

What else is there to discuss? Anyone who wants your guns out of sight, wants them banned. Anyone who wants their use or carry curtailed, wants them banned. Anyone who wants them banned, wants to kill you. No more discussion. Every discussion about gun control should end in discussions about nooses from here on out, because there is NO DISCUSSION.

No Quarter.

Show post
Erik Rush #fundie wnd.com

Among the more shrill allegations voiced by constituent subgroups of the political left is that the opposition (Republicans, conservatives and Christians) would gladly kill them in a great purge if only they had the practical capacity to do so. During the 2004 campaign season, iconic pop singer and self-described “fag hag” Cher (urbandictionary.com: A woman who enjoys hanging out with gay men) publicly proclaimed that George W. Bush would ship homosexuals off in cattle cars to death camps were he re-elected.

I suppose Cher reasoned (if indeed she does reason) that doing this had somehow slipped Bush’s mind during his first term.

I’ve heard the same charge leveled with regard to ethnic minorities, that right-wingers would just love to re-institute slavery or segregation; in their perfect world, they could simply wipe out those nasty darker-skinned people altogether. Naturally, this presupposes that all right-wingers are white.

Those on the left routinely typify their opponents as intolerant, hateful and potentially violent. This has increased in volume and frequency under the Obama administration, which codified these mischaracterizations into Department of Homeland Security policy; DHS has designated pro-lifers, patriots, constitutionalists, Christians, amnesty opponents, gun enthusiasts, military veterans and other groups as potential terrorist threats.

In keeping with their hypocrisy and incongruity, leftists conveniently omit the fact that they have carried out more terrorism, pogroms, mass murders and genocide than any political group in history. As regular readers will be aware, projection of their antisocial character defects onto opponents is a hallmark of the left’s methodology.

Their objective is to convince as much of the citizenry as possible that their warnings are at least somewhat plausible. This way, when DHS Storm Troopers arrive in the wee hours to collect their neighbors, they will accept the cover story without protest: The detainees were involved in a terrorist plot to carry out large scale “hate crimes” against illegal immigrants, homosexuals, or some species of endangered grouse.

What we are in fact seeing is the political left, through deception, incrementalism and outright violation of the Constitution, insidiously maneuvering rational, law-abiding Americans into a position so untenable that at some elusive but inevitable point, violent civil disobedience – vigilantism – may be the only practicable response.

There are a few very sobering commentaries published recently that address the de facto criminalization of Christianity in the wake of Canada having legalized “gay marriage” in 2005. One is Lea Z. Singh’s “Same-sex ‘Marriage’ and the Persecution of Christians in Canada,” written for Crisis Magazine.

Previously, I identified an analogue between the process of abortion having become legal in the U.S. and the push for legalization of same-sex-unions. It’s a bait-and-switch, with the practice bearing little resemblance to the theory.

As Singh and other commentators have explained, the same tactic was used to secure “marriage equality” for homosexuals in Canada. Opponents of legalizing same-sex unions were given frequent and impassioned assurances that their religious liberties would continue to be protected. Singh writes: “The preamble to Canada’s Civil Marriage Act states that ‘everyone has the freedom of conscience and religion,’ and ‘nothing in this Act affects the guarantee of freedom of conscience and religion. …’”

This did not hold true, however, as the Canadian government, dominated by radical leftists, took it as license to legislate social norms. It is now illegal to express opinions on gender identity or preference that deviate from the new pro-homosexual, anti-Christian orthodoxy.

According to Ms. Singh, “It is not premature to speak of open discrimination against Christians in Canada.”

Canadian homofascists – with the imprimatur of the government – have established the baseless and biologically fallacious equivalency between interracial and same-sex relationships as conventional wisdom. Thus, “Christians who believe in traditional marriage are the modern-day equivalent of racists,” says Singh, “and warrant identical exclusion.”

This means that if you’re a Christian, or do not otherwise embrace the sodomite movement, it is legal and encouraged to deny you a job, a promotion, housing and engage in your being systematically disenfranchised.

Bear in mind that all of this is taking place in a country wherein 52 percent of the population opposed the “legalization” of same-sex “marriage” to start with.

Shortly, Singh writes, all public schools in Ontario will implement a new, mandated curriculum beginning in the third grade. This course of study introduces children to the perverse, patently idiotic concept that gender itself is a matter of choice, that “transgender desires are just as perfectly normal as homosexual leanings.”

And Canadian parents dare not oppose this, because it would make them quite literally subject to prosecution. As an effect of the Civil Marriage Act, the very concept of what constitutes a “parent” changed, so many parental rights were summarily negated.

Since the passage of the law, hate-crime tribunals began prosecuting Canadian Christians for publicly articulating biblical values. Homosexual activists have spies in churches, monitoring sermons for biblical passages considered to be “hate speech.” Pastors have been jailed, businesses fined out of business and individuals driven into bankruptcy.

So, how might American Christians react to such developments here? The reason I ask is because the wheels are already in motion. The satanic minions in our government absolutely must bring about these societal transformations in order to “kill off” God and establish the State as the ultimate arbiter of morality. Rending the family unit asunder will ensure that the State becomes the individual’s sole guide, instructor and authority from cradle to grave.

I’m not inclined to think that We the People will respond as submissively as Canadians did to a similar scenario transpiring here. In fact, when otherwise rational, law-abiding Americans suddenly realize that the last of their liberties have been legislated, regulated and executive-ordered away, their response just might make the left’s accusations in the opening paragraph a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Show post
Jim Roberts #fundie cultnews.com

Cult leader Jim Roberts is dead. He died in Denver during December according to an official coroner’s report obtained by a member of the Cult Education Institute (CEI) message board. Roberts ruled with absolute authority over his small flock of followers, which probably never numbered much more than a hundred core members.

The relatively obscure group often drew attention because of its bizarre behavior. Known as both “The Brethren” and “The Brothers and Sisters” the group was also frequently called the “garbage eaters” due to its practice of feeding from garbage dumpsters. The nomadic cult recruited on college campuses and was the subject of news reports when students that joined suddenly vanished.

Roberts, a former Marine, known to his followers as “The Elder” or “Brother Evangelist,” lived a very secretive life and was rarely photographed. In 1998 an ABC News crew, led by journalist Dianne Sawyer, managed to confront him. Roberts subsequently refused to answer questions and quickly ran away.

Roberts was pronounced dead on December 6, 2015 at 6:59 AM. The likely cause of death was cancer. Cult members identified the body and claimed that Jim Roberts had not seen a doctor in 40 years. Upon his death Roberts, who was 5 feet 8 inches tall, weighed 105 pounds and was clothed in a green T-shirt, khaki trousers and an adult diaper. Authorities obtained fingerprints and digital photographs.

Followers in the Roberts group often “suffered health problems” that could have been cured through modern medicine. Instead at times they died due to medical neglect. One reportedly passed away from pneumonia.

The Roberts group claimed to be based upon the bible, but was known for encouraging its members to terminate contact with family with and old friends. Members then wandered from place to place under Roberts’s guidance fund raising and attempting to persuade people to join the group. Cult members lived largely from charity and whatever food they could find, much like homeless people. One former member explained that Roberts “weaseled his way into control until next thing you knew he was running every aspect of your life.” Another former member described Roberts as a “paranoid megalomaniac.”

Show post
Nya Nya Jo #fundie edendecoded.com

There are numerous accounts by current and former LGBTQ people who state the gay lifestyle is violent, promiscuous and oppressive... much unlike the seductive 'loving' image of same-sex relationships portrayed on television. In these accounts, they say older men and women prey and abuse the younger ones coming into the LGBT lifestyle.

Below, you will find an interview with an EX gay porn actor, where he details what causes homosexuality and the level of sexual abuse involved in the gay lifestyle.

I'm sure you're wondering why I wrote these 'Rainbow Seduction' articles... I wrote these articles because I care about the welfare of our children. I know many parents are too busy living their own lives that they don't understand what's going on.

There are many kids who think they are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, and they really are not. There is no scientific evidence that anyone is born gay... But there is plenty of evidence to suggest that people are programmed to be gay: they were either raped, abused or repetitively watched gay & lesbian sex acts on TV or in movies.

I WANT PARENTS TO UNDERSTAND: the LGBTQ community is VISUALLY molesting our children with gay and lesbian content in order to keep a rolling roster of participants to have fun with. If you remember in the documentary in the article 'Rainbow Seduction' part 1, The Homosexual Agenda, you will have heard a gay man say, "We want to get our rights and then we want to have FUN!"

Young people need to understand that the LGBTQ community pretends to be loving and kind, but they aren't. The media, which THEY control and manipulate deceitfully shows them in the most caring and loving light. But they are VERY far from this. I have shown plenty of video footage in this article and in part 1 of this article, showing the Sodom & Gomorrah debased-lust spirit they operate through.

Parents you must understand that the LGBTQ community knows what they are doing by exposing your child to 'gay sex.' The ultimate goal of the LGBTQ community is to shape society into their image at the expense of yours, at the expense of God's and at the expense of our children.

In closing, I want you to remember how for decades both the American public and legislative leaders argued that there was nothing wrong with Cigarettes. But look, decades later, we are living out the consequences of believing a "popular lie" that was promoted by only people who benefitted from it.

This is the same type of 'popular lie' that exists in the LGBTQ lifestyle. It is damaging to every child, every adult to every family. Hopefully, when people break free from the LGBTQ's seductive grip, there will still be an American society left.

And for any Christians, who promote homosexual sex, shame on you! You know what specifically happens to a person and society because of it. How can you forget the story of Sodom and Gomorrah?

"the men from every part of the city of Sodom — both young and old — surrounded the house. They called to Lot, 'Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.' Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him and said, 'No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.' 'Get out of our way,' they replied. 'This fellow came here as a foreigner, and now he wants to play the judge! We’ll treat you worse than them.' They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door."

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah was not a cautionary tale, it is a real historical account displaying the way society is becoming and will be once the LGBT community has unlimited rights to have sex with whoever and how ever they please... and once they outnumber heterosexuals, you can expect to live in a climate culture like Sodom and Gomorrah.

I predict in the near future, if we stay this present course, there will be a time where heterosexual men & women will be publicly raped for sport, just like they do in prison and back alleys today.

I'm still amazed that the American Christian Church is attempting to rationalize and make peace with the LGBT community. The bible is pretty clear that there is no way to make peace with anyone that has this level of sexual perversion and disrespect for God; Lot couldn't rationalize with them through their homo-mob-rage, and neither can you.

Please protect your children, and your children's children's children... God bless.

Show post
Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

God is always working with the eternal picture in mind. We humans act with now in mind. If I see a homeless man, my instinct is to try to rush in and fix his life for him. But God is working with that soul and He is using his current circumstances to teach him many important lessons. Perhaps He went to great lengths to drag that man down to the low point he is now at and perhaps He is trying to break some stubborn will in him. If I let my human logic lead me, I will only get in God’s way. If I let Him lead me, my timing will always be perfect and He will use me to greatly bless people. Only God sees the soul of a man and knows what he truly needs. Only God sees the future and understands how every life impacts every other. Compared to God, I am a complete fool filled with wrong instincts and flawed logic. If I really want to help someone else, I MUST listen to God, for He is the only One who knows how to do it.

Show post
Tom Perkins #fundie thinkprogress.org

Asked for an idea that could “change the world” by FORTUNE’s Adam Lashinsky, billionaire venture capitalist Tom Perkins told an audience at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco on Thursday that Americans shouldn’t be able to vote unless they pay taxes and that the wealthy should have more votes.
“The Tom Perkins system is: You don’t get to vote unless you pay a dollar of taxes,” Perkins said. “But what I really think is, it should be like a corporation. You pay a million dollars in taxes, you get a million votes. How’s that?” Watch the full interview here.
The audience laughed at the idea, though CNN Money notes that the billionaire did not indicate that he was joking. Afterwards, he suggested that he was being purposely controversial, “I intended to be outrageous, and it was,” he said, adding that the comments “make you more angry than my letter to the Wall Street Journal.”
Last month, Perkins used a Holocaust analogy to describe his concerns for the safety of the top 1 percent of income earners, writing, “I would call attention to the parallels of Nazi Germany to its war on its ‘one percent,’ namely its Jews, to the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the ‘rich.’”

Show post
Robert Romano #fundie tennesseestar.com

One of the most evil aspects of Nazi ideology was the dehumanization of its opponents: the Jews, communists, Poles, Gypsies, gays and so forth. It was a necessary precondition, psychologically, for what ultimately became mass murder.

But it takes other forms, too, that are harder to spot. We may use them ourselves occasionally in considering political opponents and not even realize it. The effect, though, is no less dehumanizing.

A very recent example of the dehumanization of conservatives came against Sen. Ted Cruz, who was confronted by activist Tammy Talpas over his support for repealing Obamacare, “If you force me into a high-risk pool, you will either bankrupt me or kill me. I take these threats of medical aggression personally and seriously, and I can assure you I’m not the only Texan who does. My question is: Will you pledge to submit to a DNA test to prove that you’re human?”

The implication, of course, is that if you support repealing Obamacare, you lack human compassion. You’re less than human.

This is a rather mild form, yet still pretty common, of dehumanization tactics by the left.

It has also been used to legitimize forms of political violence. U.S. Senator Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), said to be a serious contender for the Democratic nomination in 2020, when asked a silly question by Ellen DeGeneres on television of who she’d rather be stuck in an elevator with, President Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions or Vice President Mike Pence, joked, “Does one of us have to come out alive?”

Now potential political violence against the President and those in his administration has become a punchline on daytime talk shows.

Last year, other forms of political violence described against the President included portraying the assassination of President Donald Trump in Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar,” or Kathy Griffin’s depicted decapitation of Trump.

President Trump himself has been repeatedly portrayed as a modern-day Hitler. If you support him, you must be a Nazi. “Dilbert” creator Scott Adams has written often on the dangers of this Hitlerization of our politics.

The “punch a Nazi” campaign itself was a somewhat ironic twist of history, insofar as the dehumanizing tactic since World War II has become to portray one’s opponents as Nazi monsters, in this case Trump supporters, who are similarly bereft of the right to live without fear of violence.

To be clear, neither Trump nor his supporters are Nazis. They are being portrayed as Nazis by the left, which makes it easier, psychologically, to deck one on the street.

Ask yourself: Do you own a “Make America Great Again” hat? Would you think twice before putting it on and walking down a city street today? If you answer the latter in the affirmative, congratulations, you too are a victim of political intimidation.

There is little wonder why this demonization led to violent riots in San Jose and Chicago during the election campaign with Trump supporters being physically assaulted. Then there was the attempted assassination of U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, Sen. Rand Paul and other Republicans at a Congressional baseball game practice in June 2017 by James Hodgkinson, a radicalized nut who thought President Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

This dehumanization also legitimizes using the color of law to prosecute one’s political opponents, for example with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s prosecution of Trump campaign officials as somehow being foreign agents in league with Russia.

In a recent Saturday Night Live skit portraying Mueller, Becca K. played by Cecily Strong, representing Democrats, is devastated to learn that President Donald Trump might not be prosecuted by Mueller. But, Kate McKinnon, depicting Mueller, offers a consolation prize: “If it makes you feel any better, the Kush is cooked,” referring to the President’s son-in-law Jared Kushner as potentially being the target of prosecution.

In short, they might not be able to get the President, but destroying the First Family will have to do. That’ll show him and everyone else what the consequences of opposition are.

Similarly, any communication by Trump with Russia — principal among the President’s Article II constitutional power to conduct foreign affairs — is viewed as tantamount to treason. This has manifested itself even at the White House, where almost every diplomatic visit or call with Russia instantly leaks and then is criminalized by media outlets.

Most recently President Trump’s conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin calling for talks on preventing another nuclear arms race — you know, which might prevent a nuclear war — was leaked and again used to portray the President as a foreign agent. This, despite a long history of American presidents since John F. Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev installed the red telephone after the Cuban Missile Crisis, who engaged with talks with Russia first on strategic arms limitations and then eventually, reductions.

Elsewhere, this dehumanization has resulted in opponents of gun control measures — which really amount to gun confiscation — by the March for our Lives movement being accused of complicity in the murdering of children by Nikolas Cruz. Surviving Parkland student Cameron Kasky told Sen. Marco Rubio, at the CNN forum on Feb. 21, “Senator Rubio, it’s hard to look at you and not look down the barrel of an AR-15 and not look at Nikolas Cruz.” Disagree with them, and you support mass murder. You’re an accomplice.

The dehumanization of the opposition can even be used to delegitimize reasonable discourse itself. There was the push to “unfriend” Trump supporters on Facebook. Actor Robert De Niro’s reaction to the success of the new Roseanne show, said to be pro-Trump (perhaps insofar as it’s not anti-Trump), was to suggest it wasn’t worth discussing, “We’re at a point … where it’s beyond trying to see another person’s point of view.”

In 2016, De Niro blatantly used the dehumanizing tactic, calling Trump a “dog” who he’d like to “punch in the face.”

Mind you, this is not merely about the animalization of the opposition, portraying opponents in the guise of animals or other creatures, often quite common for example in political cartoons. That’s not what we’re talking about here.

When combined with some of the other elements described above, fed by a genuine belief that the opponent truly is less than human, then yes, the animalization of political enemies — which was absolutely used by the Nazis — can become a potent weapon. Couple it with, say, a call to violence or use it to portray entire groups or races of people as subhuman, and you’ve probably crossed that line.

That’s plenty of examples. They are by no means exhaustive. And dehumanization is not merely the province of the left, but recently it has become increasingly prevalent with gathering support in the mainstream.

It should be alarming.

But it isn’t.

The Ted Cruz story where he’s supposed to take a DNA test to prove he’s human was shared tens of thousands of times as it was reported across media outlets almost as an afterthought. Maybe you saw it on your Facebook feed this week. It’s just a joke, right?

The question perhaps we should ask is what impact this might be having on the nation at large? Because it appears that it is really beginning to take its toll.

Recall, not only can dehumanization be used to legitimize political violence, in its most extreme form, in Germany, after years of endless state-run propaganda, it was channeled toward the destruction of millions of people.

Right now, we’re clearly not there yet in this country. But when one half of the nation starts to believe the other half is no longer worthy of rights or even basic respect, the country is in trouble.

There are consequences for this tactic, which on the surface may appear to simply serve a partisan agenda. Something to agitate supporters in preparation of the next round of elections. But underneath, it seems to bear all the hallmarks of pure hatred. This is not how you win elections. It’s how you create social discord.

The real danger is that this demonization of Trump, his supporters, conservatives and others is that it could be generating true believers, who no longer see their opponents as fellow Americans — and perhaps not even from the same species.

Show post
Steed #racist eyeofwoden.blogspot.co.uk

Early on Sunday morning a man walks out of the local Asian-run newsagent with a newspaper, climbs into his Land Rover parked just outside, drives 200 yards down the road and turns into his small private lane where he lives.

[...]

I am going to try and describe how such small, individual choices are contributing to the death of England (and all Western lands) – we’ve all heard about ‘the butterfly effect’.

This anonymous man used a small amount of petrol, unnecessarily, thus putting money into government coffers to be used for funding regime-changes abroad (and ultimately the formation of the one-world government). He also bought a newspaper owned and run by foreign elements, thus allowing those foreign elements to shape his worldview. And lastly, he bought said newspaper from a shop owned and run by people of immigrant extraction, thus justifying the presence of vast numbers of foreigners in English land. He voted with his car-keys and his wallet. Now imagine a million similar Englishmen doing the same thing every Sunday morning, and this is just an example of one type of habit prevalent in the English mindset.

[...]

What was once a pub-restaurant at the top of my road is currently being converted into a Tesco Express. The speed at which it is happening is frightening enough, but what’s worse is the nature of the advertising boards lining the outside of the building site. There are around ten of them, half with slogans such as “you shop, we drop” and half with pictures of Tesco employees – all of which, without exception, are non-white and thus non-English (and also particularly ugly). It’s easy to become complacent about such advertising choices these days (what with all the banks and sofa retailers depicting interracial couples), but just think about it for a moment. One of, if not the biggest supermarket in the UK using purely non-indigenous people to represent itself. This is in fact a bold and not-so-subtle statement which says “the UK’s social structure is no longer run or defined by the natives”. Furthermore, Tesco don’t even feel the need to pander to the natives by including a single ‘token’ white. The intention is bold and arrogant. Yet, when one considers that Tesco was founded, and is run, by Jews ('Tesco' being a combination of the founder’s daughter’s names – ‘Tessa Cohen’) then the brazen disrespect of the indigenous people of this land becomes a little more explainable. This would be just as wrong were Tesco owned by the Japanese – my intention is not to inflate the understandable perception of Jewish domination – the point is that Jews, and thus their companies, are not indigenous to the UK and should not pretend to dictate our values or demographics.

Show post
The Ozark Frontier #fundie forum.nationstates.net

I imagine places such as the Middle East and the more rural parts of South America will one day be known as the "last bastions of religion". In other words, it's purpose has been served, and more and more people are waking up to reality.

It’s Porpoise has hardly been served. Belive me, People cannot survive a Meaningless life like what Atheism Offers. Because in an Atheist Society, Your tiny, miniscule, Worthless. No one would care if you were to Kill yourself. Such a Sad Existence has no place in Life.

Show post
Brother Berg #conspiracy extracapsa.wordpress.com

Aleister Crowley’s House Burns Down: The Synagogue of Satan Fire Ritual
DECEMBER 23, 2015 BROTHER BERG3 COMMENTS
Aleister-Crowley-b_3534685b

“The former home of the self confessed ‘most evil man in Britain’ was virtually destroyed by a fire which ripped through the 18th century Loch Ness-side mansion, once owned by black witch Aleister Crowley. The blaze was spotted around 1.40pm by a motorist on the A82 Inverness to Fort William road which runs along the north side of Britain’s most famous stretch of water.” – BBC Article
MOST EVIL MAN IN BRITAIN =239 (The Thirteen Bloodlines / The Gang of Thirty-Three / Global Elite / The 44th President Barack Obama / Barack ‘Barry Soetoro’ Obama / Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing / Golden Gate). America is currently 239 years old.

MOST EVIL MAN IN BRITAIN =104 (The 44th President Barack Obama) – which synchs up as a double-word score and with the blaze spotting time of 1:40. Boleskine Lodge burned down 140 years after Crowley was born in 1875. The property also features exactly 140-feet of foreshore on Loch Ness. BURNS DOWN=40.
OBAMA=14. FOURTEEN=41. OCCULTIST=41. ABBADON=41. SATANISTS=41. LOCH NESS=41. Crowley was known as LORD BOLESKINE=141.
BOLESKINE=38. DEATH=38. FIRE=38. ALEISTER=38. BLACK WITCH=38.

Aleister-Crowley-b_3534687b

ALEISTER CROWLEY=82 and Boleskine Lodge was located on the A82 motorway. HIGH MAGIC=82. DISCORDIA=82. ORDO AB CHAO=82. House Burns Down=63. Barbara Crowley=63. Barbara Pierce=63. Crowley is the Loch Ness Monster=136.

“In 2002, a BBC poll ranked him as the seventy-third greatest Briton of all time.” ALEISTER CROWLEY (1+3+5+9+1+2+5+9)(3+9+6+5+3+5+7) =73. RITUAL SACRIFICE =73.
Screen Shot 2015-12-23 at 5.00.17 PM

With the S-exception, House on Fire and Boleskine Lodge =72 and Crowley died at age 72.
Boleskine House =61/160. Beast of Boleskine =61/160. DEVIL WORSHIP=160. GOD=61. JOHN DEE=61. CROWLEY-BUSH=61. THREE-ONE-ONE=61 (His nickname “The Beast”=311).

The Boleskine House =76. Laird of Boleskine =76. Luciferianism =76. Blood Sacrifice =67. Human Sacrifice =67. Satanic =67. Serial Killings =67. Alchemy =67. ARSON =67.
Boleskine House at Loch Ness =96/114. Satanism=96. The Synagogue of Satan=1140.
FIRE RITUAL=56/119. STAR OF DAVID=56/119. ALL-SEEING EYE=56/119. AEON OF HORUS=56.

“Local legend has it that the house was built on the site of a church which was burned down, killing the entire congregation who were attending Mass.”
6990301_f520

Led Zeppelin’s Jimmy Page, a Crowley fantatic with all the right coding, bought the house in 1970 yet only spent a few weeks there, haunted to hell as it is. Crowley’s cult of Thelema (64) is based on the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, of which Crowley was a vital component.

Screen Shot 2015-12-23 at 5.29.12 PM

Aleister Crowley IS the Loch Ness Monster…
The house burned down on 12/23. Like the fulfilment of 223. THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN=223. Crowley died on 12/01. THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN=1201.

Screen Shot 2015-12-23 at 5.56.00 PM

The date of the fire has a life lesson number of (12+23+2+0+1+5) =33. AEON OF HORUS=137 (the 33rd prime). BLACK MASSES=33.
(12/23/2015) =60. LORD BOLESKINE=60. THE GOLDEN DAWN=60. CONSPIRACY=60.
(12/23/2015) =40. BURNS DOWN=40. Again, Crowley would be 140 years old today and the fire was reported at 1:40.

Show post
BlueSue #conspiracy geoengineeringwatch.org

Hello Paul in Minnesota, as you mention, your state’s extremely frigid temps were about 60 degrees colder that what it was here where I live in (relatively balmy) Alaska yesterday – damn strange I’d say! It is horribly disturbing to know that you folks are being chemically and electromagnetically freezer-burnt as you describe, but I can relate to what you say from experience. In contrast, here yesterday, our local area had a dense “cloud” of “fog” envelope everything (at about 33 degrees F) that was of course sprayed and laid upon us during the night continuing the effect of our artificial warmth. With considerable anxiety do I ever draw a breath out of doors anymore, especially when it’s so in your face, and you can literally, see, smell, and taste the toxic air.

Our friend Dominic, the plant pathologist, describes here the truth concerning the plague upon our trees. And the “disease” attributed to the particular pest (spruce beetle, et al) is a symptom of the sinister biochemical/electromagnetic assault upon life, our precious trees being the guardians of our ecosystems. Sadly I doubt that there are any pristine places left on this planet. Alaska is one of the few states where maybe something close to “pristine” may still be sought, if not found. It is still relatively heavily wooded in my hometown except where clusters of commercial buildings and dense neighborhoods exist. But everywhere you look, the trees appear pathetically sick or dead — leaning, fallen, or most of those still standing with branches and bark over-encrusted with lichen or black fungi or similar signs of decline. The once thick stands of evergreens are no longer vibrant dark green, but now are heavily spoilt with rusty-brown hues – the shade of dead spruce trees. Our once brilliant blue skies of cold winter days are most often an ugly milky gray like everywhere else these in these unnatural times. This one-minute video shows a horizon scene so very like what I see here in Alaska each morning or evening – with the perpetrators obviously doing their evil deeds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bg8eM6CDec

“The question is whether any civilization can wage relentless war on life without destroying itself, and without loosing the right to be called civilized.”

And another quote, also, from the same exceptionally wise woman who saw the truth long before most of us:Rachel Carson, author of Silent Spring.

“Those who contemplate the beauty of the Earth find reserves of strength that will endure as long as life lasts.
Show post
Ann Barnhardt #fundie barnhardt.biz

I want to make a distinction between effeminacy and, for the sake of clarity, “swishing faggotry”. Most men today are still, in fact, heterosexual. But they are extremely effeminate. Whilst being sexually oriented towards heteronormative acts (simply put, they “like girls”), their mode of being, of addressing the world, is almost completely feminized. When confronted with a problem, their method of dealing with it is to first DENY THAT THE PROBLEM EXISTS. Eyes down. Look away. DON’T TALK ABOUT IT. Pretend nothing is wrong, and eventually the problem will either go away, fix itself, or someone else (namely “a man”), will solve the problem for us, out of sight, and then we won’t ever actually have to deal with it. This is how females are generally wired, because women are physically weaker than men, and the best way for a woman to keep from getting raped and murdered is to AVOID combat situations in the first place. This is what today’s post-Christian western man has been trained to do and be since infancy.

The other profoundly feminine mode of avoidance is something I observe on a near-daily basis. It is the strategy that says, “Let’s wait to do anything until it is too late to do anything. Then it won’t be our fault, because it will have been too late to do anything.” This is such transparent cowardice, but oh, so attractive to the effeminized men of today. It is painted not as the abject cowardice and impotence that it is, but rather as “prudence”. It is now believed that the prudent man is not the man who discerns and does the right, but rather the man who does NOTHING.

I am reminded of Bonhoeffer’s quote: “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”

No, the hallmark gesture of today’s effeminized man is not the limp wrist and swishing hips of the “faggot”. The hallmark gesture of today’s effeminized post-Christian western man is the SHRUGGING OF THE SHOULDERS. Devoid of virility, devoid of potency, and at its core, devoid of CHARITY, today’s man, when confronted with evil, turns his head away to the side, shrugs his shoulders, and bleats out his twin mottoes:

THERE’S NOTHING I CAN DO ABOUT IT.

I DON’T CARE – IT’S NOT MY PROBLEM.

And so, many people look at the oligarch class, these nefarious characters infecting every corner of society, from the halls of academia, to the corporate boardrooms, to the halls of government, to the halls of the Church, and they see, generally, drooling imbeciles. And they then think that surely these drooling imbeciles will do themselves in – all we need do is wait for them to trip over their own thingamajigs and beat themselves. But that isn’t going to happen. They will continue to roll. They will continue to march down the field, because not only are we not mounting an effective defense – MUCH LESS any sort of counter-offense, WE AREN’T EVEN FIELDING A TEAM.

If two teams are playing, and one team is the “NFL Dream Team of All Time” and the other team is comprised of a blind, mentally retarded three year old, the blind, mentally retarded three year old, ALONE, can beat the NFL Dream Team of All Time IF the Dream Team never comes out of the locker room. The blind, retarded three year old can literally run up and down the gridiron, scoring at will, so long as the Dream Team remains in the locker room, watching the blind, mentally retarded three year old cross the goal line time after time, shrugging their shoulders, declaring, “There’s nothing we can do about it. Whatever. It’s not my problem.”

And what is never shown on camera or discussed is the “coach” (satan) and “assistant coaches” (demons) on the sidelines, coaxing and calling the mentally retarded three year old down the field to uncontested score after uncontested score.

Show post
HisWisdomReigns Says #fundie baptistsforbrown2008.wordpress.com

[You just don’t get it. I am a christian mother of a gay son and you just don’t get it. Your hate does so much damage….. I can feel Jesus weeping over the damage you do.]

Melina,

My condolences on your son’s “condition.” Yes, Jesus does weep over the hate we good Christians have to endure on this site and in this society. Join us and make this world just a little bit better.

Show post
jo-e36 #conspiracy jo-e36.tumblr.com

People who think extremely mainstream entertainment like fucking Star Wars or MCU movies have ANYTHING profound or insightful to say about the world should honestly neck themselves for being so naive as to think they can trust imagery presented by the most establishment of establishments. It’s basically propaganda, at this point it’s almost state published bullshit and people are sitting there eating it up “wow so brave and courageous a statement written very deliberately, challenging absolutely nothing and provoking no uncomfortable thoughts, built to appease as many manchild liberals as possible mmm yes delicious please teach me more Hollywood” god fuck off.

Show post
Faith Facts #fundie faithfacts.org

When the subject of Gay Marriage comes up, how are Christians doing at communicating the harm to society with the secular world? Do we have logical reasons to present without being perceived as being "Bible-thumping"?

Here are 20 reasons which may help communicate to our secular friends that Gay Marriage is not only a moral issue for Christians, but a societal ill. All but a few of these reasons are secular rather than religious:

1. The whole fabric of gay rights disappears with this fact: There is no scientific evidence that people are born gay, and much evidence exists that proves the opposite. People leave the homosexual lifestyle and desire all the time. (See http://www.faithfacts.org/christ-and-the-culture/gay-rights#born.)

2. Marriage is the fundamental building block of all human civilization, and has been across cultural and religious lines for 5000+ years. By encouraging the norms of marriage—monogamy, sexual exclusivity, and permanence—the state strengthens civil society. Society as a whole, not merely any given set of spouses, benefits from marriage. This is because traditional marriage helps to channel procreative love into a stable institution that provides for the orderly bearing and rearing of the next generation.

3. Contrary to the liberal and libertarian viewpoint, marriage is not merely an institution for the convenience of adults. It is about the rights of children. Marriage is society’s least restrictive means of ensuring the well-being of children. Every child has the right to a mom and a dad whenever possible. Numerous studies show that children do best with two biological parents. Here is just one study: Two Biological Parents.

4. Marriage benefits everyone because separating the bearing and rearing of children from marriage burdens innocent bystanders: not just children, but the whole community. History shows that no society long survives after a change that hurts the sanctity of marriage between one man and one woman.

5. Law cannot be divorced from reality—from nature. The two sexes are complementary, not undifferentiated. This is a fact of nature, thus given by God. No government has the right to alter what is true by nature. (See America’s Declaration of Independence.)

6. Redefining marriage would diminish the social pressures and incentives for husbands to remain with their wives and BIOLOGICAL children, and for men and women to marry before having children.

7. The results of redefining marriage—parenting by single parents, divorced parents, remarried parents, cohabiting couples, and fragmented families of any kind—are demonstrably worse for children. According to the best available sociological evidence, children fare best on virtually every examined indicator when reared by their wedded biological parents. Studies that control for other factors, including poverty and even genetics, suggest that children reared in intact homes do best on educational achievement, emotional health, familial and sexual development, and delinquency and incarceration. In short, marriage unites a man and a woman holistically—emotionally and bodily, in acts of conjugal love and in the children such love brings forth—for the whole of life.

8. Studies show domestic violence is three times higher among homosexual partnerships, compared to heterosexual marriages. A large portion of murders, assaults, other crimes and various harms to children occur along with, or as a consequence of, domestic violence. Half of pedophilia attacks are homosexual, for example. Normalizing homosexual marriage also encourages non-marital homosexual activity, and thus the social pathologies associated with it.

9. Promiscuity is rampant among homosexuals, including those who are married. Various studies indicate that gays average somewhere between 10 and 110 different sex partners per year. The New York Times, among many other sources, reported the finding that exclusivity was not the norm among gay partners: “With straight people, it’s called affairs or cheating,” said Colleen Hoff, the study’s principal investigator, “but with gay people it does not have such negative connotations. ‘Openness’ and ‘flexibility’ of gay relationships are euphemisms for sexual infidelity.” One study showed that only 4.5% of homosexual males said they were faithful to their current partner, compared to 85% of heterosexual married women and 75.5% of heterosexual married men. Promiscuity is a destabilizing influence on society.

10. The confusion resulting from further delinking childbearing from marriage would force the state to intervene more often in family life and expand welfare programs. If marriage has no form and serves no social purpose, how will society protect the needs of children—the prime victim of our non-marital sexual culture—without government growing more intrusive and more expensive? Without healthy marriages, the community often must step in to provide (more or less directly) for their well-being and upbringing. Thus, by encouraging the norms of marriage—monogamy, sexual exclusivity, and permanence—the state strengthens civil society and reduces its own role. (Libertarians, do you see the importance of this? If you want the state to be less intrusive, get off the gay marriage idea!)

11. Promoting marriage does not ban any type of relationship: Adults are free to make choices about their relationships, and they do not need government sanction or license to do so. People are free to have contracts with each other. All Americans have the freedom to live as they choose, but no one has a right to redefine marriage for everyone else.

12. Law is a teacher. Just as many people, even some Christians, thought that slavery was okay when it was legal, will think that gay marriage is OK when it is legal.

13. Gay marriage is undeniably a step into other deviances. What will result are such things as plural marriages and polygamy. These things could not logically be turned back, and will initiate a further plunge of societal stability.

14. Only a small percentage of gays who are given the right to marry do so anyway (4% by one study). This proves that the gay marriage movement is not about marriage, but about affirmation.

15. Anal intercourse leads to numerous pathologies, obviously because the parts do not fit! Among items in a long list of problems listed by researcher and physician James Holsinger are these: enteric diseases (infections from a variety of viruses and bacteria including a very high incidence of amoebiasis, giardiasis, and hepatitis, etc.), trauma (fecal incontinence, anal fissure, rectosigmoid tears, chemical sinusitis, etc.), sexually transmitted diseases (AIDS, gonorrhea, simplex infections, genital warts, scabies, etc.). Anal cancer is only one of other medical problems higher in gay men that heterosexual men, especially monogamous heterosexual men. Society at large pays for these diseases. (Speaking to “Christian Libertarians,” unlike certain activities that also contribute to national health problems, such as obesity, homosexuality is morally wrong. Poor eating habits are not a moral issue; gluttony is not a sin.)

16. The ravages of the gay lifestyle are severe upon the gay community itself but also for society at large. The best available evidence shows that those practicing homosexual behavior have a 20% to 30% shorter life span. A much higher rate of alcoholism, drug abuse, sexually transmitted disease, domestic violence, child molestation and more occur in homosexual populations. (See http://www.faithfacts.org/christ-and-the-culture/gay-rights#ravages.)

17. It is okay to discriminate. We discriminate all the time in our rules and laws. It is illegal to marry your parent. It is illegal to be a pedophile or a sociopath, no matter how strong the innate tendency might be.

18. Gay marriage and religious freedom are incompatible because it will marginalize those who affirm marriage as the union of a man and a woman. The First Amendment is at stake! This is already evident in Massachusetts and Washington, D.C., among other locations. After Massachusetts redefined marriage to include same-sex relationships, Catholic Charities of Boston was forced to discontinue its adoption services rather than place children with same-sex couples against its principles. Massachusetts public schools began teaching grade-school students about same-sex marriage, defending their decision because they are “committed to teaching about the world they live in, and in Massachusetts same-sex marriage is legal.” A Massachusetts appellate court ruled that parents have no right to exempt their children from these classes. Businesses that refuse to accept gay marriage as a legitimate institution will be penalized. It is a certainty that the church will at some point, be unable to preach the full council of God. It will be considered hate speech to speak of traditional marriage as right. Churches will begin losing their tax exempt status. Individuals who speak out against gay marriage will be penalized. This is only the tip of the iceberg. (Speaking again to "Christian Libertarians” who are OK with gay marriage: Do you see the issue here? This is important! Legalizing gay marriage nationally will lead to an assault on religion.)

19. Homosexual practioners cost more than they contribute via disproportionate diseases and disasters such as HIV, hepatitis, herpes, mental illness, substance abuse, suicide, assault, etc. The Center for Disease Control estimates that each HIV infection ALONE generates $700,000 in direct and indirect costs. (Source: Family Research Report, April 2014)

20. Homosexual activity and marriage robs our future by: having fewer children, poorly socializing the children they raise, commit about half of all child molestations recorded in the news. (Source: Family Research Report, April 2014)

The question is asked, why shouldn't two people who love each other be allowed to get married? ANSWER: Marriage is not about love. In many countries around the world, marriages are arranged. Marriage is about the rights of children and thus is about supporting the next generation. Anything that weakens the institution of marriage is an injustice to children and a travesty to the culture.

Show post
Larry Klayman #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Right-wing attorney Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch posted a video over the weekend praising Attorney General Jeff Sessions for saying that he is open to naming a special counsel to investigate the actions of the Justice Department under President Obama.

Klayman vowed “to be in effect, a type of Hamburger Helper” for the Justice Department in this effort, working alongside Sessions to ensure that the “evil forces of the left” working in opposition to President Trump are destroyed and put in prison.

“I commend Attorney General Jeff Sessions,” Klayman said, “and I hope to work with him in this noble goal. This is just round one. It’s time that the evil forces of the left be legally destroyed. In this world that we live in today, it’s either them or us; the two of us cannot live side-by-side. One is going to have to go, legally, peacefully. But these people who are trying to destabilize the Trump presidency and not have this country be made great again, frankly, they need to be thrown in prison.”

Show post
JRM #racist theoccidentalobserver.net

If you want a simple analogy, imagine Western White Civ as a car; a Jew is at the wheel, and we current living goyim are passengers in the backseat. The driver is headed toward a cliff. Our problem: we don’t have a rational figure at the wheel, but a clever psychopath. As we plummet over the cliff, we realize our chauffeur is going to die right along with us, but all we can hear is his maniacal, hate-filled laughter.

Show post
n/a #fundie homeworship101.com

If you ever run into a ‘get-GOD-out-of-government’ person, ask ‘em a simple question: “If they do not want GOD as the grantor of human rights, then what mere mortal do they suggest?” Let ‘em ramble a few minutes, and then just remind them of history. (And don’t let them sandbag you with the term democracy. Democracy has been around since the Greeks, and it’s basically mob-rule doomed to failure.)

Show post
Albert Cipriani #fundie iidb.org

Humans intuitively know about God in the same way chickens instinctively know how to peck. It's part of our nature. That's why atheism is intellectually an unnatural act... If your children lacked the imagination to have invisible friends, that’s too bad.

Show post
True Player #fundie rooshvforum.com

[Images not included]
MODERN FEMINISM

Sometimes you can’t help but think there must have been divine intervention. The same day I pen my article about why Adelaide women are the best in Australia, I pick up the front page of the paper to see outrage that 500 young Adelaide women have had naked photos of themselves plastered all over an American website.

You may have noticed I didn’t sing the praises of Adelaide women aged 18—25 in my article. That was for good reason. Here is a passage that unfortunately didn’t pass the final ROK edit:

One word of warning: you had better strike while the iron is hot. With feminism destroying women at a truly scary rate all over the world, this could very well be the last generation of desirable Adelaide women. On recent visits I have noticed a disturbing rise in the number of girls aged 18-25 with ugly tattoos and piercings. Obviously, it goes without saying they are addicted to their smartphones. It breaks my heart because many of these girls would be really attractive if they embraced their natural beauty, put on a nice dress, and put down that damn phone.

I truly believe western millennial girls are nightmares, even in sleepy little Adelaide. What we are seeing with so called ”revenge porn” is an example of the disturbing but inevitable consequences of the first generation of women who, brainwashed by feminist propaganda, truly believe they can do no wrong, and that there are no consequences for their actions. Throw in their smart phone addictions and toxic need for constant social media validation and you have a recipe for disaster.

At this rate, we are not too far from a world where every second man’s girlfriend’s or wife’s tits will be plastered all over the net, her slutiness on display for the whole world to see. This is supposed to be your loving life partner, the mother of your children? How can any man these girls meet in the future possibly take them seriously?
A tech-savvy generation? Millennial girls’ behaviour indicates otherwise

fb-addicted1

Young women are so addicted to social media they can’t see the negative effects it has on their lives

The millennial girl’s smartphone obsession is of course the root of their misery, but it’s their lack of intelligence and social awareness that is truly astounding. How can they not get it? Once a photo is put on the internet, it is there forever. Media reporting on this story was incredibly irresponsible. These photos certainly were not “stolen”, as journalists claimed. Whoever got these photos didn’t break into these girls houses, nor were they Peeping Toms who had secretly photographed them without their knowledge or consent. In fact, they had been willingly uploaded to social media or sent directly to the latest bad boy to make their vaginas tingle. From that point onwards, they were totally at the mercy of that bad boy as to what happened next. Some empowerment! Now admittedly putting them on the web for the whole world to see is a pretty low act, but they don’t call them bad boys for nothing. You can bet your bottom dollar these are the guys who are far more likely to receive and distribute “sexts” than the nice guys forever languishing in the friend zone.

Despite all this, I feel sorry for these girls. They have grown up in age where being a slut is glorified and where their peers give as little thought to posting revealing selfies online or sending “sexts” as they do to taking a piss. Unlike women from previous generations, at no point in their lives have they been pulled aside and told in no uncertain terms that being easy reflects poorly on themselves and is likely to be a one way ticket to disaster. It’s not politically correct, you see, and many have been denied a strong father figure by their money-hungry mom who wanted freedom, a divorce and custody. This is why millennial girls are not only narcissistic and slutty, but completely oblivious to how broken they have become, and why they are hopelessly addicted to the crack pipe of Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. All they need to do to break free of this toxic cycle is log off, but unplugging from the vortex would be unthinkable. Next thing you know, BAM, there they are spreading their legs on the net for the whole world to see for the rest of time.
Millennial girls are trapped in a social media vortex

Woman using cell phone on bed

Young women love selfies more than life itself

“Revenge porn” wouldn’t exist if young women weren’t so obsessed with selfies. Sadly, millennial girls are so infatuated with internet “fame” everything else is merely background music. To demonstrate how warped their perspectives are, consider this. What did this girl do when she found out she was on the site? She re-uploaded a photo from the site of her in the shower to her Facebook! Yep, she tried to get even more attention! All this does is draw even more people to check out the website she is supposedly so outraged about. Out of curiosity I looked up her Facebook page, and sure enough, it is selfie after selfie. She is quite hot, but obviously so desperate for fame I can’t help but wonder if she is secretly thrilled she now has a chance to step out of the shadows of her well-known football playing brothers. As the shocking revelation of Dubai Porta Potties showed, millennial women want fame, no matter what the price is.
Women have been betrayed by feminism

PW_ClementineFord

Feminist woofer Clementine Ford.. all for female empowerment, but for God’s sake don’t expect women to exercise self-responsibility

Predictably, critics have directed all their energy into attacking the faceless American creators of this site and furiously denouncing “victim blaming”, rather than spreading the word to young women everywhere that uploading raunchy photos to social media and sexting guys is risky behaviour with potentially very serious consequences. Bottom line: If girls don’t send these pics out, they can’t end up on a site like this. That would put these “shady creeps” out of business permanently. But in the twisted minds of feminists, prevention is never better than cure: don’t teach women to do X, teach men not to do Y. They have always played the victim, abrogated the concept of self-responsibility and denied the reality that women’s actions have potential consequences, and now girls everywhere who were brainwashed to believe exactly that are paying the price.
Is there any hope for young women?

Teens-social-media

Scenes like this will be familiar to us all.. what does it take for young women to put down their phones?

The prospect of having a daughter one day seriously scares the hell out of me. What chance do you have of raising a decent human being, when you are fighting a reckless pro-slut cultural tsunami?

There was a time when the family unit provided the guidance young women needed to develop important values. Unfortunately, with The Decline accelerating this is often impossible. For most girls, any semblance of fatherhood authority has long gone. If they really care for the welfare of girls, mothers and genuinely concerned women need to fill this void and educate them that acting like a slut must be avoided, for this behaviour places them at risk of ending up on sites like this, forever. Is that something they really want? They might also want to consider how driving a strong man out of their daughter’s life might have devastating consequences.
Conclusion

Like so many other modern social problems, feminism is definitely to blame for “revenge porn”. This warped ideology has always irresponsibly promoted the delusional idea that women have all the same rights as men, but without responsibilities or consequences for their actions. They were the ones who encouraged a life of reckless hedonism and narcissism for young women, with no thought for their futures. They were the ones who spun the gross lie that being pumped and dumped by men who couldn’t care less about them is “empowering.” These 500 Adelaide women are just a drop in the ocean of the many girls who are being sacrificed daily at the altar of “female empowerment.” This is what happens when it is politically incorrect to state the obvious: that acting like a slut is dangerous for a woman’s honour, credibility and future happiness.

Show post
Steven R. #fundie conservatism.referata.com

Sermon 19: Dave Ramsey Debunked
By Bro. Steven R.
John 14:2 “In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.”
Matthew 6:19-21 “Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.”
Matthew 19:24 “And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.”
Dave Ramsey is a heretical preacher who claims to believe upon the Lord Jesus Christ, yet has idols such as Wicked Donny as well as the almighty US Dpllar. Well, Ramsey talks to emotionally vulnerable people who are in dire financial straits and he helps them get out of debt. So, if he just wants to help people get out of the slavery to the debtor, that’s fine, but he also talks about how people need to accumulate material wealth and they need to become millionaires whenever they retire.
1 Timothy 6:10 is what Ramsey heedeth not! It says “For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.” Ramsey hateth and openly mocketh the Word of God! RAMSEY SAYS THAT PEOPLE ARE SUPPOSED TO GO AND WORK TOWARD STORING UP TRASH! WE NEED TO GET AWAY FROM THIS SINFUL DOCTRINE! CAN I GET AN AMEN?!!!!!!!
Many places are using Dave Ramsey’s financial wealth programs into their churches, replacing Sunday school programs and godly sermons! He also uses false versions of Scripture that aren’t fully Textus Receptus based like the KJV! The NIV, NRSV, ESV, N”KJV,” and all these other papist fake Bibles and even Baptist Churches are tolerating this!
The Bible says to work six days, and rest one day. We have to work hard and make MODEST WAGES off the SWEAT OF OUR BROW! Let’s not try to go and get wealthy! The Lord saith that we aren’t supposed to go and show off and flaunt our wealth by leaving $500 tips at Applebee’s or buying a Lamborghini! DRIVE THAT BEATER CAR AND EAT BEANS AND RICE AND DRINK WATER! THE LORD DOES WANT YOU TO GO AND LIVE A MODEST LIFE SO WE CAN LAY UP TREASURES IN HEAVEN! THIS WICKED HERETIC USES FALSE BIBLES AND FALSE DOCTRINES WHENVER THE BIBLE SAYS THAT THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL!!!!!
It’s not okay to corrupt the Word of God with popery or other such heretical doctrines and philosophies! Dave Ramsey also believes that women have to have equal say in the finances! The MAN IS SUPPOSED TO RUN THE HOUSEHOLD! NO FEMALE SUPERIORITY, NO FEMINAZISM, DAVE RAMSEY IS A WACKY FEMINAZI!!!!!!!!!!
We have to respect the Lord and respect our churches! We don’t need to do anything except be responsible by paying off debts and living a modest and meager life! Dave Ramsey must not be trusted as he’s a wicked heretical false prophet who is leading sinners to Hell because they’re focusing more on building up earthly treasures instead of soul winning and going to Heaven and building up treasures there!!!!!!!!

Show post
Mattius Maxumus #racist moonbattery.com

[Law Enforcement Targets Inc. offers cut-out targets with images of children, the elderly, etc.]

So it’s not ok to have a silhouette of the nigger president, but it’s ok to have a silhouette of a pregnant white woman and little kids? This is the kind of shit that makes me über happy when I read about cops getting shot and dying. Who do you think will be sent door to door when the time comes to take your rights away? I’ll give you a hint, it will be a cop(s). FTP!!!

Show post
Mike King #sexist tomatobubble.com

Though modern libtards and Marxified millennials will no doubt gush over this "feel good" story; to a traditionalist with a healthy appreciation and respect for true womanhood, true motherhood, and healthy culture, there is so much bloody wrong with this pathetic comedy unfolding down in New Zealand.

Jacinda Ardern is a 37 year-old New Zealand feminist Globalist libtard who became Prime Minister in October, 2017. During her campaign, she attracted international media attention when she bitchily denounced the male interviewer who had asked whether she planned to have children and take maternity leave if elected. Ardern -- oblivious to the fact that she serves the public -- was applauded for defiantly telling the interviewer (and by extension, the public) that it was “totally unacceptable in 2017” for women in the workplace to have to answer such a question.

Arden joins Refrigerator Solberg of Norway, the Frumpy Frau of Germany and Mamma May of the UK as female leaders of libtarded nations. Well, at least she is much easier on the eyes than the other three rancid hags.

Now, just a few months later, Ms. Ardern, who is not married, has announced that she is expecting her first child, due in June. A bit of basic math confirms that she must have already been pregnant while running for Prime Ministerette. How very "modern" of her. But there's more. Her "partner" and "baby daddy," Clarke Gayford, has just announced that he will take leave from his job after the birth to become a stay-at-home dad. Still more modern comedy, straight from the article:

"She admitted that her family’s situation was unusual in some ways, saying that she had suffered “pretty bad” morning sickness during the first three months while forming a new government, and that she did not know “how the government cars would feel about having a baby seat in them.”

Ms. Ardern said she planned to work right up until she gives birth and would then take six weeks of parental leave. During that time, she said, the deputy prime minister, Winston Peters, will assume her duties.

After that, Ms. Ardern added, she planned to return to “full duties,” with Mr. Gayford traveling with her and their child as often as possible."

This drama is really a dream-come-true for the modern libtard. It's got everything -- a vomiting female Prime Minister who is an unwed mother, set to collect parental leave pay while the de-balled and dutiful "baby daddy" adapts to his "stay-at-home" subordinate role. We wonder, will the Prime Ministerette be breast-feeding or breast-pumping into little plastic bottles, as she rides in the back of her limo while she and baby-daddy are out and about on state visits? Oh what a horrible example of "family life" to set for the young women and men of New Zealand!

The new Prime Ministerette and P-whipped First Baby Daddy of New Zealand?

It is not out of disrespect for women, but rather, to the contrary, out of the highest respect for women that Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times can only heap mockery upon this sordid spectacle. A woman's place -- especially for a new mother -- and her ultimate satisfaction in life is to be found in the "hearth and home," not the bloody, nasty, and intrinsically dishonest world of politics. We understand that that the modern debt-based capitalist-communist economy requires many miserable mothers to work because one income is often insufficient to carry a household. But that is certainly not the case with "baby daddy" here -- who is (soon-to-be "was") a well-paid host of a TV fishing show.

Indeed, British Queen Victoria -- though she naively allowed the despicable Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (cough cough) to undermine the long term interests of the Empire -- was spot-on correct when she looked into the future and warned about feminism and women in politics:

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of "Women's Rights", with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection. I love peace and quiet, I hate politics and turmoil. We women are not made for governing, and if we are good women, we must dislike these masculine occupations."

Tell it Queenie, tell it!

And yet, we doubt that even Queen Victoria could have foreseen this idiotic modern freak show that is still developing down in New Zealand, with similar situations throughout the western world.

YIKES!

A few of the "hateful, heathen and disgusting" finger-waving maniacs that Queen Victoria accurately foresaw: Killary Rotten Clinton, Senator Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren, Congresswoman Maxi-Pad Waters

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the Prime Minister of New Zealand is expecting a baby and will take maternity leave.

Boobus Americanus 2: That great. It sets a wonderful example of what is possible for our daughters.

Sugar: Boobuss, you pathetic little mangina! Thiss brazen little husssy needss to ressign, quit her left-wing politicss, marry the father and sstay home to raisse her litter -- like I did.

Editor: It's a shame that your ungrateful little kittens never call you.

Show post
Mike King #conspiracy tomatobubble.com

Eisenhower’s presidency had coincided with a long period of peace and prosperity. Indeed, the title of the popular 1970’s TV show, Happy Days, refers to its setting in the 1950’s. The Eisenhower years mark the peak years of “the baby boom” and upward mobility of all classes and ethnic / racial groups. Apart from a minor and short-lived recession in 1958, the 50’s truly were “the good old days.”

One would therefore think that the Republican Party (aka GOP for Grand Old Party), with its popular and superficially likable “war hero” presiding over these “happy days,” would have greatly expanded, or at least maintained the Congressional majorities which Ike inherited upon winning the 1952 election in a massive landslide. This was not the case. To the contrary, in spite of two massive Eisenhower landslides, the 1950’s turned out to be a history-altering bloodbath for House and Senate Republicans, and it was not by accident.

1952 & 1956: Eisenhower won two historic landslides and remained popular for the full eight years of his presidency. Meanwhile, conservative Republicans in Congress were picked off by the dozens. Why?

There were two elements driving this extremely odd paradox of such a popular president not having any election “coat tails” for his fellow Republicans to grab onto. First, the Globalist media, while constantly exalting Eisenhower on one hand, trashed what was then a mostly conservative, anti-communist, constitutionalist Republican Congress with the other. But the real death blow of the one-two punch knockout of the GOP Congress came from Eisenhower himself.

During the 1954, 1956, 1958 and 1960 election seasons, Eisenhower -- with the exception of a few liberal “modern Republicans” -- refused to lift a finger in defense of his beleaguered colleagues. He was the one man in America who could have protected the patriotic anti-communist Republican Congress from the daily whipping it was taking from the Globalist press, but he refused. Robert Welch describes Ike’s silent treachery of 1954, which only grew worse in subsequent Congressional elections, and peaked during the 1958 mid-term elections in which the GOP lost an additional 49 seats in the House, and 14 in the Senate. Welch:

“Nor can there be any slightest question about the disruption of, and damage to, the party being intentional. Eisenhower not only refused to do any campaigning for, or to give any White House moral support to, the Republican Senatorial and Congressional candidates – he left their campaigns permanently disorganized through his deliberate delaying tactics with regard to his expected support, which was never forthcoming. Then, at the very last minute, he went through face-saving motions, of which a high-school politician would have been ashamed, with his fantastically childish scheme of chain telephone calls.” (6)

“Delaying tactics,” eh? Just like the World War II delays which got so many Americans killed while preserving Eastern Europe for Stalin! The final paradoxical results of Eisenhower's sabotage were truly astonishing -- all the more so when we consider how popular Ike had remained from start to finish of his 8 year reign of ruin. Here are the final "before and after" numbers:

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1952: 221 Republicans and 213 Democrats = R +8

1958: 153 Republicans and 283 Democrats = D +130

SENATE

1952: 49 Republicans and 47 Democrats = R +2

1958: 35 Republicans and 65 Democrats = D +30

As shocking as those statistics are, there is more to the numbers than meets the eye. You see, many of the Senate and House Republicans who did manage to survive the Eisenhower purge were "modern Republicans" -- today known as "RINO's" (Republican in Name Only). And most of the incoming Democrats who replaced them were of the extremist Marxist variety. Their dominance would shape the course of America's political, economic and cultural decline for decades to come.

There can be no doubt. Eight years of Ike killed the Republican Party, just as it had the conservative majority of the Supreme Court... by design. No bloody wonder Democrat Sulzberger's New York Slimes and Democrat Meyer's Washington Compost endorsed him, twice.

The Democrat Party, which had been on the brink of destruction just six years earlier, knocked out the Republican Party in an epic rout. Yet “Republican” Eisenhower always remained popular. The result pleased Eisenhower and Democrat Senate Leader Lyndon B. Johnson very much.

Show post
Tenebras Lux #fundie therepublicanstandard.com


There is so little that distinguishes today’s liberal Christians from the ancient Pagans to whom the gospel was originally preached, they would be more honest in dropping the name “Christian,” and adopting once again the title of Pagan.

Before I continue, the term liberal Christian is used in a theological and moral context, and not necessarily a political one. It comes from the 19th century in which Christians sought to liberate themselves from traditional orthodoxy in favor of a more progressive interpretation of doctrine in a modern world. It is possible for a political liberal to hold orthodox views on Christian theology, but the correlation against shows it is very rare. Furthermore, one can hold conservative political ideology and be very much a “Liberal Christian.”

One of the reasons Christians were so despised in Ancient Pagan Rome was because of their claim to exclusivity in the quest for eternal life. They were actually called atheists because they denied the validity of other (the Romans’) religion’s claims. They were intolerant of the pantheistic ideas Rome held, and were persecuted because of their arrogant claims that Jesus was the only way to eternal life.

Today, religious pluralism is once more in vogue, and to deny the validity of non-Christian claims to salvation – or to affirm the exclusivity of Christian claims to salvation – makes one almost immediately an arrogant bigot, and worthy of scorn. Pushed by popular culture icons such as Oprah, liberal pastors began to adopt the idea, and congregations soon followed. A Pew research poll found that 52% of professing Christians believed that even non-Christian faiths can lead to eternal life. Of course that doesn’t make their opinion correct (it only makes it unorthodox), but it does indicate how far the reach of religious pluralism – Paganism – has spread today.

Pagan Rome and Greece were notorious for their licentious sexual activities and wanton lasciviousness in the pursuit of pleasure. Homosexuality was not considered a sin; in fact, it was rather expected in their cultural milieu. While they never went so far as to call a homosexual union a civil marriage, no state or custom apparently tried to prevent the practice, but instead encouraged it in certain instances. This was one of the sins that Paul preached against to the Corinthians, who were notorious in the Hellenic world – even to Cicero – for their lust and sexual liberty.

Liberal Christians now have come full circle, refuting overtly what Paul had preached and insisting that such activity is not only tolerable, but may be righteous in the sight of God. They no longer preach against perversion as outlined in the Bible, but celebrate it as much, if not more so, than the Pagans of Corinth or Rome.

Perhaps the latest iteration of Paganism to manifest itself in the professing Christian Church is the toleration toward polyamory. One could predict it wouldn’t be long, given the logic of sexual acceptance based solely on the litmus test of “consent.” (Not the objective consent of the Creator, mind you, but the subjective consent of the Creation.) Today, ordained ministers in the Christian Church are not just tolerating the idea of polyamorous relationships, but are encouraging it as a scriptural sacrament.

Jeff Hood, a minister in the Southern Baptist Convention justified his views on holy polyamory by invoking the Holy trinity:

~~~~

“I heard the voices of the polyamorous repeatedly whispering, ‘Why are you persecuting us?’ Unable to contain myself, I shouted out, ‘Forgive me!’ At that moment, I collapsed. Before I perished, I felt the pull.

“Divine polyamory found me a sinner and lifted me up by grace. The Holy Trinity ushered me to love. Looking around, I saw a great cloud of polyamorous witnesses shouting, ‘Holy! Holy! Holy, is the polyamorous love of God!’”

~~~~

Utter blasphemy. “Without the polyamorous we cannot know God,” Hood also says.

What this reminds me of is the same orgiastic culture so prevalent in Pagan Rome and Greece – the same culture to whom the Apostles and the Church Fathers fought so hard to preach the Gospel, in order to free them from their sins.

In the second century, Marcus Minucius Felix wrote an apologetic dialogue responding to Pagan criticisms of the Christian Church, and in this dialogue Felix exposes the same behaviors outlined above, and goes further to chastise the Pagan culture for their abhorrent practice of abortion and infanticide:

“And I see that you at one time expose your begotten children to wild beasts and to birds; at another, that you crush them when strangled with a miserable kind of death. There are some women who, by drinking medical preparations, extinguish the source of the future man in their very bowels, and thus commit a parricide before they bring forth. And these things assuredly come down from the teaching of your gods.”

Of course, for Liberal Christians today, they would never dare preach against abortion, but instead have come full circle into celebrating the sacrifice of children upon the Saturnine altar of the god “self-worth”.

So this raises the question: If Liberal “Christians” have re-adopted so many of the Pagan practices that the early Church evangelists preached against; and if they deny the validity of those fundamental characteristics that distinguish Christianity from Paganism (like the exclusivity of Christ), why do they insist on calling themselves Christians? If they would stop pretending, I might respect them more intellectually; but the fact remains they blaspheme the name of Christ and His work when they continue to celebrate as righteous that which God has explicitly forbidden.

Show post
Conservative Tribune #fundie conservativetribune.com

Gold Medalist Shooter Fires Massive Shot At Liberal Anti-Gunners


The Olympic games are supposed to be an apolitical gathering of athletes from around the world engaged in fierce but friendly competition in a variety of sports and sporting events.

Unfortunately, thanks to our hyper-partisan liberal media, the games are becoming increasingly more politicized, as reporters seemingly can’t help but inject their bias into the questions they ask of the athletes competing in the quadrennial games.

Take for example a recent TIME interview with gold medalist Olympic shooter Kim Rhode, who is attending her sixth Olympic games in Rio this year, where she stands to become the first female Olympian to win a medal in six straight games.

The 37-year-old skeet and trap shooter was pressed for her opinion on the issue of strict gun control as a response to incidents of gun violence, and she wasn’t afraid to tell the reporter exactly how she feels about it.

“We have that stigma attached to our sport,” explained Rhode. “When you are talking to a NASCAR driver, they’re not asked to comment on an incident that occurred with a vehicle.”

“We should have the right to keep and bear arms, to protect ourselves and our family,” she said. “The Second Amendment was put in there not just so we can go shoot skeet or go shoot trap. It was put in so we could defend our First Amendment, the freedom of speech, and also to defend ourselves against our own government.”

Rhode further stated that it was her intention to teach her 3-year-old son the same outlook on gun rights as he grew older.

“I hope to have him out there shooting, when he becomes of age,” she said. “I started when I was like 7 or 8 years old, and it was something that was a big deal in my family, to gain that right of passage.”

As to strict gun control laws being passed in the wake of tragic mass shootings or terrorist attacks, like the one in San Bernardino, not far from Rhode’s home in Los Angeles, she couldn’t be more in disagreement with the “misguided” politicians who react that way.

“My heart breaks for those people,” she said, but such tragedies merely “make we want to carry even more.”

“I shoot 500 to 1,000 rounds a day, so having to do a background check every time I purchase ammo, or every time I want to bring ammo in or out of a competition or a match, those are very challenging for me,” said Rhode, explaining the inconvenience of California’s new gun control laws.

“Also, I’ve had guns in my family for generations that have been passed down, and now I’m going to register them as assault weapons. And they will not be passed on to my son, or to me from my father,” she continued. “It definitely does affect me and give me a reason to speak out more.”

Rhode, who is sponsored by firearm manufacturers Beretta and Winchester, will shoot for another gold medal and a place in history on August 12.

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter to help spread the word about this gold medalist Olympic shooter that understands the Second Amendment and the gun rights it protects.

What do you think of what this Olympic shooter had to say about gun control and the Second Amendment? Scroll down to comment below!

Show post
Ted Weiland #fundie constitutionmythbusters.org

As Creator, the Potter has the authority to do with His pots whatever He chooses. As Sovereign, He has the right to do whatever He decides with His entire creation. In fact, He’s the only one with this right. As the Potter, all rights are exclusive to Him.

“Certainly, we have a right to life!”

Do we? Does man have a right to life? Or is even the right to life exclusive to God?

If man has a right to life, that right then dictates God was obligated to create us. If this is true, who’s really the prime cause: the Creator who was obliged to provide the right or the created who had the right to life?

Only Yahweh has a right to life. It’s inherent in who and what He is: I Am That I Am—the great and only self-existing I Am That I Am.

For us, life is not a right. It’s first a gift from the Life Giver and then a responsibility. We are obligated to use our lives as intended by the One who gave us life. To claim life as our right is to eliminate any requirement of responsibility to our Creator. In reality, it’s an attempt to usurp His exclusive claim to sovereignty.

The inherent problem in claiming even life as a right should be obvious. Is it any different with other rights—even those enshrined in the Bill of Rights, which are hallowed by most Americans, particularly Christians?

Most Americans view the first Ten Amendments to the Constitution as sacrosanct and inviolable. But this is the song of a siren.

The First Amendment’s guaranteed “rights”

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Are these rights enumerated in the First Amendment biblical? If they’re biblical, they’re guaranteed by Yahweh. If guaranteed by Yahweh, they should be found in the Bible. If they’re not biblical, they’re “guaranteed” by someone else who can and has incrementally taken them away:

In Understanding the Constitution: Ten Things Every Christian Should Know About the Supreme Law of the Land, David Gibbs, Jr., and David Gibbs III argue for unalienable rights:

Our rights come from God, not from the state. Therefore, the state cannot take them away. What Uncle Sam gives, Uncle Sam can take away. But our nation’s birth certificate, the Declaration of Independence makes clear that our rights are unalienable because they come from God.

This sounds wonderful, but is it true? The State has certainly taken away an unwanted infant’s right to life. The State has incrementally taken away gun owners’ Second Amendment rights. The State has taken away the right to happiness, in particular the right to own property. Because rights come from the State, the State can take them away at its pleasure.

The right to religion

What about the First Amendment’s right to religion as provided in the Free Exercise Clause? Does man have a right to whatever religion and god he chooses? If so, how does this comport with the First Commandment?

I am Yahweh thy God…. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. (Exodus 20:2-3)

For thou shalt worship no other god: for Yahweh, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. (Exodus 34:14)

Man may choose to follow a god other than Yahweh, but he does not have the right to do so. It logically follows: Should government then provide such a right? If it does, what’s this say about such a government?

If it’s your right to choose any god you prefer, you cannot be judged for doing so. And if you can’t be judged for choosing another god, who’s really sovereign?

It’s not our sovereign right to choose our god but God’s sovereign right to choose us. Consequently, the alleged right to choose one’s god is itself a claim to divinity, tantamount to what was offered Adam and Eve in the Garden, “Ye shall be as gods!”

Christians need to rethink their love affair with First Amendment’s seditious “right” to religion. It was provided not by Yahweh, but by a group of Theistic Rationalists and Enlightenment Freemasons, whose ideological paradigm is polytheistic to its core.

The First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause is responsible for transforming America from what was a predominantly monotheistic Christian nation (a united nation under one God) into one of the most polytheistic nations ever (a divided nation under many gods). It is arguably the most clever cover devised by man for sedition against Yahweh. It certainly has duped the majority of Christians into promoting the First Amendment as if some grand Christian ideal is found therein.

Only the Sovereign has a right to religion.

Show post
LD50 #fundie theguardian.com

Art gallery criticised over neo-Nazi artwork and hosting racist speakers
Artists and campaigners call for closure of the LD50 gallery after accusing it of promoting ‘hate speech not free speech’ but owner criticises protesters

A London art gallery has come under criticism for exhibiting neo-Nazi artwork and hosting openly racist speakers.

This weekend, artists and campaigners will protest calling for the closure of LD50, in Dalston, east London, after accusations the gallery gave a platform to anti-immigrant, Islamophobic and “alt-right” figures and promoted “hate speech not free speech”.

Guests at LD50’s Neoreaction conference last summer included Brett Stevens, the white supremacist whose writing was an inspiration to Oslo far-right terrorist Anders Breivik, who murdered 77 people in 2011.

After Breivik’s attack, Stevens wrote: “I am honored to be so mentioned by someone who is clearly far braver than I, no comment on his methods, but he chose to act where many of us write, think and dream.”

Others on the conference programme included anti-immigration activist Peter Brimelow, who runs Vdare, described by the Southern Poverty Law Centre as “an anti-immigration hate website” that “regularly publishes articles by prominent white nationalists, race scientists and antisemites”.

Brimelow’s talk at LD50 was orientated around the threat imposed on “native white Americans” by a “great influx of third world immigration”. He said that while it was socially acceptable for Hispanic and Asian ethnic activists to call for more immigration, the only people who get criticised are whites; described the Black Lives Matter movement as a Democratic party racket purely designed to increase turmoil; and referred to the Jewish faction of the Democratic party vote as problematic.

Gallery owner Lucia Diego said in a statement published on the LD50 website that the programme was intended to create “a dialogue between two different and contrasting ideologies” and that the audience for the conference was “very liberal”.

However, a recording of Brimelow’s talk reveals that members of the audience who contributed to the discussion were predominately sympathetic to his views, agreeing with his statement about the need to remove the “corrupt treacherous elite” in government and one professing support for David Duke, the former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan and Holocaust denier.

Shut Down LD50 has accused the gallery, which has previously exhibited works by Turner Prize nominees Jake and Dinos Chapman, of curating “one of the most extensive programmes of racist hate speech to take place in London over the past 10 years”. They said the fact that the list of names of the conference speakers had been made public only after the event was finished was telling. “At first in secret, LD50 has acted as a platform for a cross-section of the most virulent advocates of contemporary extreme-right ideology.”

Alongside the conference, the gallery hosted an art exhibition titled Amerika, which explored far-right and Nazi imagery and featured video works of far-right and neoreactive texts being read out by avatars. A pink swastika was graffitied onto the gallery front door last week.

Writing on his ultra-conservative blog, Amerika.org – which is directly linked to on the gallery’s website – Stevens said the neoreaction conference had been held behind a “veil of secrecy to prevent the usual suspects (Leftists and other neurotics) from attacking”.

Last week, in an Facebook exchange with artist Sophie Jung, Diego described the left as “more like a fascist organisation than the real fascists” and indicated her support for Donald Trump, writing: “I’m not even sure if I disagree with the Muslim ban. I see it also as a temporary measure in order for America to get sorted while they transition to another form of government.”

In an open letter, Shut Down LD50 said that it could not “creditably be argued that the talk series was an instance of artistic license or of the free-spirited ‘exploration’ of ideas.

“The fact that the gallerists decided to make the details of their conference public only in late November, after the Trump election victory, is the clearest evidence of conscious purpose”.

Andrew Osborne, a fine art technician at the Royal College of Art, who is among the campaigners, said they would be handing out 2,000 leaflets in the area around the gallery on Saturday to make the public aware of the gallery’s allegiances, adding that the campaign had the backing of businesses neighbouring the gallery. “We believe this is a matter of public safety,” he added.

In her statement, Diego defended the gallery’s programme, writing: “We feel that the exceptionally aggressive, militant and hyperbolic reaction this has provoked vindicates our suspicion that at some point, as a society, we have drifted into a cultural echo chamber.”

She said the reaction of the protesters was proof that anyone who disagreed with the left was “publicly vilified, delegitimated and intimidated with menaces”.

“Our position has always been that the role of art is to provide a vehicle for the free exploration of ideas, even and perhaps especially where these are challenging, controversial or indeed distasteful for some individuals to contemplate.”

Show post
Unknown author #fundie leagueofthesouth.com

Most Southerners by now have seen the constant media coverage of the “Syrian Refugee Crisis,” where tidal waves of undocumented, Muslim immigrants have waltzed through the very heartland of white, Christian Europe. The liberal media have aided these people at every turn, making claims that these are just innocent refugees, trying to get clear of the fighting.

Yet, there remain several curious facts about these “refugees”:

First: 75% of them are young men, in their 20s and 30s, with very few women and children to speak of. Odd, right? You’d think if these were heads of households fleeing a scene of destruction, that they’d take their families with them. Yet most don’t have families with them.

Second: they don’t simply walk next door, across the Turkish border where there is no fighting, and hunker down. No, they walk all the way across Turkey and Anatolia, until they cross Europe’s Southern borders.

Once they cross those borders, do they stop there, where there’s also zero fighting, like real refugees would? No sir!

Even though by that time, they’ve been free of fighting for thousands of miles, they trek further, all the way up to Germany, the UK, or even Sweden.

Puzzling, right? Well, not if you happen to know the true explanation as to why hundreds of thousands of third world Muslims are trekking to just those three countries … Free Goodies

The real reason that this Islamic army is descending upon the hapless, white populaces of Christian Europe is quite simple. Merkel’s government in Berlin has offered very lucrative, financial benefits to any third-worlder who bothers to cross their border! Does that sound familiar? It should! For that’s precisely what Washington, DC, in all its corruption, is offering to hordes of Latinos. Simply cross the South’s border and voila: free healthcare, tuition, social security, voting status, drivers’ licenses, and other enormously lucrative benefits to each and every one … all at YOUR expense!

The hard truth is that both of these scenes, in Europe, and here in the South, on many occasions aren’t cases of “refugees” seeking shelter, or immigrants looking for an honest life. No, these are armies of invaders, because, make no mistake, these are invasions, plain and simple.

The radical, leftist governments of Western Europe and Washington DC are both acting against their own white populations, to ethnically replace them with third world populations willing to work for next to nothing. These governments care neither about their oaths of office nor the safety and well-being of their people.

They care only about bending over backwards to give away Western, Christian civilization to those who had nothing to do with building it!

The most disturbing aspect is that other than a few heroic political leaders, few others (with power) have the will to do what must be done to stop it.

Wait though! If you were thinking, “Well, at least we’re not getting flooded with Muslims like poor Europe is. It’s a good thing that wouldn’t happen here in Dixie…,” then I’m afraid I have some very bad news for you, friend.

President Obama is not content to merely destroy half the Middle East with pointless wars paid for with borrowed Chinese money—no. He’s now hell-bent on shipping hundreds of thousands of Syrian Muslims into the very heart of Dixie.

It’s true; the plans have already been revealed to bring thousands into the upstate region of South Carolina. Others are planned to be shipped into various parts of Tennessee and elsewhere.

Ask yourself these questions:

Do you think that bringing in several hundred thousand new human souls into our Southland is a good idea, when we don’t even have enough jobs for our own people?

Do you think that bringing in several hundred thousand Muslims into our Bible Belt is a good idea?

Can’t you just picture it: minarets, instead of steeples, springing up in the deep South, as you and your loved ones awaken to hear a Muslim call to prayer from the local mosque … just down the street from you?

Does this sound like a great future?

The Federal Government says it is, and they say you’re gonna like it, that you have no other choice.

Upon this point though, the League of the South disagrees with Washington in spades, and we’ve been doing something about it.

Several years ago, when treacherous corporations (and sadly, some liberal churches) conspired to bring Muslims to Murfreesboro, Tennessee, the League of the South stood alone, fighting back and condemning this unspeakable attack on the Christian, white South.

There were so many third world Islamic peoples brought into the quaint, picturesque town of Murfreesboro, that they even built a large mosque in the city.

We were not amused.

We organized a rally and called out the traitorous politicians who supported the ethnic replacement of their own Christian, Southern populace with third world, Islamic workers. We held up signs that said, “No Jihad in Tennessee,” because we knew the truth: sooner or later, when enough Muslims are allowed into a community, a radical, violent element will follow it. Always.

Sadly, we were vindicated in July 2015, when Mohammad Abdulazeez went on a shooting rampage, killing five servicemen in Chattanooga, Tennessee. While this killing shocked many in Tennessee, it did not shock us. How many more Southerners will have to die before we take back our Southern lands from those who insist upon replacing us?

The Federal Government calls Islam a “religion of peace;” the League of the South calls it a hateful, dangerous abomination that belongs nowhere in our Southland!

The Federal Government calls their act of bringing in hundreds of thousands of Muslims “an act of love.” The League of the South calls it an act of war on our Christian people!

The Federal Government says that Muslims will “culturally enrich” the South. The League of the South has seen about as much “cultural enrichment” that Muslims have forced upon other nations as we can stand!

We at the League of the South call upon Southerners to admit some very uncomfortable truths:

The truth is that this is no longer “the land of the free,” and Southerners won’t be free while under Washington DC’s occupation.

The truth is that DC is forcing the South (against its will) to take in these third world Islamic elements and at our people’s expense.

The truth is that Dixie’s sons and daughters have loved a country (the US), that has not and does not love them back.

The truth is that white Southerners are being ethnically replaced by millions of second and third world immigrants, who are driving down our wages, taking our jobs, and even committing violent acts against our own people. Enough is enough!

We declare that the South has already been overrun by too many foreign invaders as it is, and we don’t want or need any more of them!

We declare that if the South was a free and independent country, we could control and secure our own borders, here and now!

We declare that the South is our homeland, and no one else’s, because our people landed here and built this civilization from nothing.

We declare that since we built it, we should take true ownership of it by deciding who comes here and who doesn’t. Sounds great, right?

The problem is that as long as we remain shackled to a liberal, progressive country, headquartered by radicals in Washington, DC, we will never be allowed to decide our own immigration, border, or citizenship policies.

Washington will decide all those things for us, and you can bet your last dollar that they’ll continue to force these alien invaders upon us until you and your loved ones have been made minorities in the lands your fathers built. Does that sound like “freedom” to you? It sure doesn’t to us, either!

The only way to stop DC from replacing us in our own lands is to secede from this oppressive, liberal construct and assert our independence as a sovereign, Southern country in the 21st century.

It can be done, and unless you want to see minarets adorned with crescent moons in your town … it must be done. Our Southern children and grandchildren have no future if they remain shackled to the United States.

We are making our voices heard and reminding our people that they are not alone. We are here fighting for them and their futures, but we need your help!

The Southern people would be much freer, safer, and happier in a country of our own. This is our dream, and we are fighting every day to make it a reality.

Do you share this dream with us? If so, then will you fight for it with us? Join us today! We’re the folks you’ve been looking for!

Show post
Sigmund Fraud #conspiracy thedailysheeple.com

The mother lode of all conspiracies is the New World Order. In essence, it is a high-level, multi-generational plan to render all sovereign national governments subservient to an unelected, supranational, authoritarian world government. In this scheme, the people of planet earth will be micro managed with strict social, technological and financial controls. It is the total consolidation of global power into the hands of a ruthless, minority elite who aim to rape the planet and enslave the human race.

They can’t do it alone, though, they need your help. They need witting and unwitting minions to set the brush fires of revolutionary change in our towns and cities. They need pawns to agitate and disrupt the relative peace, and to upend the status quo with turmoil. They need senseless, animal-like violence, caught on camera and replayed ad infinitum on cable news and social media. They need terror, of both the foreign and domestic variety. They need fear in the streets, and fear in the minds of the proles.

Most of all, though, they need you to create chaos, so that they can bring order.

The powers that be, those demons of the deep state, those orchestrators of fear, famine, debt and war, cannot achieve their plan without leading the masses into confusion and disarray, for only then will the masses demand an end to their own freedoms and privacy. And sadly, it appears their army of minions is growing in strength and audacity.

In the aftermath of Charlottesville it is more clear than ever that there is no shortage of pawns for the New World Order. The armies of ignorance are gathering, and here are three signs you might be among them.

1. You’re Playing the Divide and Conquer Game

Left vs. right. Black vs. white. Republican vs. Democrat. Citizen vs. Immigrant. Communist vs. Fascist. Have vs. Have Not. My Team vs. Your Team. Me vs. You.

There a thousand and one ways for a society to faction and split apart, but without community and unity we are lost, doomed and done. If you’re entrenched in one side of any dualistic paradigm, seeking to convert or to crush the other side, then you’re playing right into the hands of the NWO.

The tactic of top-down divide and conquer is the oldest play in the book of how to overthrow sovereign people. The rulers foment conflict amongst the people, then step out-of-the-way and let them fight it out, so that they can step in later as the benevolent savior… big brother.

If you’re playing this game, then you’re doing their work for them.

2. You ‘re a Vocal Supporter of the War DuJour

Today the drums are beating for a nuclear assault against North Korea… and military intervention in Venezuela. Just recently we’ve been told we need to prepare for conflict with Russia, and that an invasion of Syria is in our best interests. Prior to that we destroyed Libya and Iraq, we occupied Afghanistan, and we’ve been using the war on drugs and the war on terror as casus belli for interference in dozens of countries around the world.

The imperial mindset is several generations deep in America, and the citizenry has all but fully abandoned the anti-war stance in favor of gung-ho, jingoistic cheerleading of any and all military escapades.

The New World Order is brute force, but in our hyper-connected world they need to create the appearance of public support in order to advance the military industrial colonization of the world. It cannot do this without the public support and advocacy of at least some segment of the proletariat.

If you’re always on board for the expansion of international conflict, taking cues from mainstream media in this regard, and demanding action against all of our perceived enemies, you are aiding and abetting the New World Order.

3. You Direct Your Anger and Frustration Towards Anyone but Those at the Very Top of the Pyramid

Zero doubt there are a million problems plaguing our complex world today, and it can be comforting to blame someone whom you can look in the eye, someone who is unprotected by the wealth and security afforded by the oligarchy. Emotional reactions to the stresses in our modern world are to be expected, but without knowledge of the contemporary power structures pulling the big strings, those reactions can be sorely misdirected onto lesser players and other pawns.

The truth is out there. At the root, a geo-political financial elite is conquering the world throughmanipulation of currencies, the imposition of astronomically insurmountable levels of public and private debt, and full spectrum military dominance of uncooperative nations. This program is far above and beyond the capacity of your fellow citizen.

If you’re convinced that taking your outrage to the streets in war against your fellow countrymen is going to solve the problems of the world, you’re helping to fulfill the goals of the New World Order.

Final Thoughts

Social unrest and civil war are the final stepping-stones to a brave new authoritarian future. In order to get there, the American people must exhibit a self-motivated and determined resolve for violence against each other.

The New World Order needs blue pill takers, those people who deliberately choose ignorance in exchange for spurious peace of mind. They need useful idiots to help distract the rest of the population from the crimes of the oligarchy. They need armies of volunteer foot soldiers and pawns who will create the conditions necessary for martial law and even broader restrictions of rights and freedoms.

For the New World Order to succeed, we must ultimately demand our own slavery.

Show post
Andrew McCombs #fundie quora.com

Of course if God were truly good and WE were evil, an attempt by God to show us that we were not, in fact, good, would be met the majority of the time with hostility and rebellion.

Yet, since God in orthodox theory IS Good, there are two characteristics which He must embody: that of Justice and that of Mercy. If God were purely to act according to Justice, he has every right to destroy all evil. If, in fact, we are all evil, He has every right to destroy us without mercy.

Yet, God being Good, must also show Mercy. Therefore, it could be argued that if it were shown that in fact we ARE all evil, the more humble of us might see that they very fact that we have continued to exist and flourish DESPITE our evil, is proof that God is merciful, even if at times He has shown His wrath.

Jesus seemed to treat evil not as a wholly deliberate state, but more as a sickness. So… we must ask ourselves this: Is it possible that we ARE evil? If evil is a sickness, isn’t it a good thing that we know our true condition, so that we can seek a physician to heal us of our sickness?

If the Devil IS truly the adversary and destroyer of good, would he want us to know that we were evil? Or would he instead convince us that we were good, and that God was evil for judging us? Evil people rarely ever believe that they are evil. Hitler thought he was the savior of humanity. We all know that evil is highly unpleasant, and how pleasant is it for one who believes he is good to find out that he is, in fact, evil? I would assume it’s just about as pleasant as a seemingly healthy person finding out that they have terminal cancer. If it weren’t for the temporal authority of a medical doctor, we might well think that someone coming up to us and telling us we are going to die was evil for doing so, and we might react towards that person with hostility… not unlike they who believed they were righteous reacted towards Jesus.

Another thing to consider is this: If God created everything, everything is His to do with as he Wills. If, as it says in Genesis, He created everything good, and suddenly evil and death break out in the midst of his good creation, is it not within His perfectly Good authority to eradicate it? Some consider God’s wrath to be proof that God is evil… yet if Evil was destroying His good creation, it would not be God that was evil for destroying evil, but it would be those which were evil who were rebelling against Him, and in doing so, perpetuating the further degradation of His good Creation. Thus, God would still be Good if, by eradicating degrading elements from Creation, He was able to save His Creation.

Many people do not like the idea that they belong to God, and that they are both subject to His justice and at His mercy, but if this adversely affects them, why does that make God evil? If God is Good, and in fact they are evil, they have no basis for criticizing what God does with either them or the rest of His creation, because they seek to do evil and to destroy (whether or not they choose to see it that way).

Furthermore, it is logically inconsistent that God could possibly be evil, since if God were evil, everything that exists as a result of God’s will would also be evil, since there would be no other definition by which to counter an absolute evil source of all things.

Therefore, the claim that God is evil is self-refuting, since claiming evil presumes an absolute measure of good, yet an absolute measure of good implies God, thus proving that God is Good, not Evil.

Thus, to claim any moral superiority to God is also self-refuting, since claiming a moral superiority (especially an absolute one) depends on an absolute definition of Good, which implies the existence of God, the very being one is claiming moral superiority to. It is absolutely absurd to indirectly invoke God’s absolute goodness to directly condemn God’s supposed evil. Yet that is exactly what the argument presented in the post above does.

Whether or not one believes in God, one can use the logic of a hypothetical existence of God to come to the logical conclusion that, if God exists, He must be Good. Any conclusion other than that is either an appeal to emotion, an appeal to ignorance, or an appeal to absurdity.

As to whether humanity is inclined towards good or whether we are inclined towards evil, one only needs to study human history, especially the past 100 years, to come to the conclusion that it is extremely probable that humans are naturally bent towards evil, which is actually much more consistent with the Biblical view than it is with modern humanist views or even most other religious or philosophical views.

That being most likely the case, and since proving moral superiority inevitably rests upon an appeal to absolute transcendent goodness AKA God, could one really say they are in a position to declare that God is evil even in His wrath, when humans have shown themselves to be so utterly incapable of the goodness they hypocritically and hypercritically accuse God of lacking?

I thinketh not.

Show post
AR-15 #conspiracy rightlyconsidered.org

This is really rich over at the homophonically-racist website, the Daily Noose. Professor of Philosophy and Law, Leslie* Green, tells us that when the right refers to universities as “liberal,” they mean universities filled with people who believe the following:

Species arose through natural selection.
No author of any gospel ever met Jesus.
Homosexuality is a normal variant in human behaviour.
The United States lost a war against Vietnam.
Human activity is a significant cause of climate change.
The United States has worse public health than do countries with nationalized health care.
Yet these beliefs are not the real threats to conservatives or the right. The true threats are the “habits of thought, modes of inquiry, and sensibilities of outlook,” which lead to such beliefs, in other words, conservatives feel threatened because “[universities] are universities.”

Got that? No, you say? Then let me mansplain it to all-y’all backwards readers of this humble blog: Them dumb tobacco chewin’ conservatives are threatened by the fact that there are all them smart fellers in them Iv’ry towers with that book learnin’ and stuff. It has nothing to do with the fact that at the Iv’ry towers they take as Gospel the following claims, with dissent met not with argument but ridicule:

-The only mechanism of common descent is natural selection.
-No authors of the Gospels ever met Jesus.
-Homosexuality is a normal [sic] variant in human behavior
-The war against Vietnam had little to do with stopping communist aggression of the north Vietnamese against the South and was not a political defeat but a military one.
-We should reduce fossil fuel use quickly by giving the government more control or else face disastrous consequences (#ClimateChangeIsReal).
-If you believe in yourself enough, you can be anything you want to be, including a man, woman, or whatever else you choose.
-You should be called an “Islamaphobe” if you denigrate Islam.
-Mexico is giving us their best and Trump is a racist (#RESIST). Because…
-Only whites can be racist.
-If you’re white, you come with a special cape that gives you “privilege power” no matter how dumb or poor your parents were.
-There is a serious problem of police injustice against blacks in the West. #BLM
-The “gender wage gap” is mostly to be explained by systematic injustices against women by (white) men.
-If you have four or five daughters, one of them is bound to get raped in college.
-Everyone should be able to go to college.
-There (REALLY) is a Constitutional right against the states to unlimited butt sechs.
-If you deny the above then you’re a bigoted bigot-faced bigot.

I’m sure I’ve missed a few. Perhaps some professors will help us fill in the gaps.

*Note: Not knowing Leslie, I don’t know if they identifies as a man, woman, or The Other. Thus, I have used the white, colonialist, capitalist, toxically masculine, gender-neutral, pronoun, “he” and various other forms to maximally be”on the wrong side of history.”

Show post
usachinanukewar #fundie usachinanukewar.wordpress.com

believe me, i learn Jesus is Emperor in a very terrifying and bloody way. No matter who you are, rich or poor, the last thing mankind wanna do is to violate Jesus’ Doctrines and upset Jesus, for Jesus is Emperor with absolute authority and power. In Heaven and on the earth, or anywhere, the last thing mankind wanna do is to upset Jesus and violate Jesus’ Doctrines. I learn Jesus is my Emperor in a very bloody and terrifying way, massive blood spitting with high fever for days, ending up crying repenting for mercy and heal in church service. Jesus is Emperor. I learn this in a very bloody and terrifying way in 2005.

Show post
Luka Ladan #fundie barbwire.com

For those entering college from a faith background, surveys show that more than half of them will walk away from their faith by the time they leave.

As twenty million young people start college this fall, higher education has not only never been more liberal, it has also never been more expensive.

In the past fifteen years alone, attendance has gone up more than four fold, but the past five years have seen the cost go up by more than seventy percent. The average length of completing a degree has gone from the standard four years, up toward five and six years depending on the state. No longer can students count on finishing by their early twenties and beginning their career with a fresh start. Student loans are at an all-time high, with students averaging in the ball park of 33,000 dollars owed to the federal government.

A federal government, mind you, that is well known for its competence at handling money.

I found myself where so many conservative young people find themselves. With all the costs of time and money, and knowing that it goes to support a brazenly liberal environment, I found myself asking the unthinkable question:

Is it worth it?

Now of course I know as well as anyone that college is no small matter in the modern economy. I have two degrees myself with another one in progress, and I have no doubt that my education has contributed vastly to my still-budding career. The debate need not be about whether to go to college, or even how much education to get.

The debate for my generation is not college versus no college. The debate is spending the best time of our lives at an old-fashioned liberal indoctrination camp versus exploring the dynamic new world of alternative higher education.

The information age has created more options for education than our grandparents could have imagined. From high schoolers trying to get ahead to senior citizens trying to raise their ceilings, online classes, CLEP tests, AP courses, DSST exams, and a whole world of test prep and other specialized websites and publishers are working to make it possible to cut the liberal gate keepers out of earning our degrees.

Take for example, CollegePlus, a Christian company that exists solely to guide students through the process of earning a college degree in less than three years, for the cost of one year of traditional college.

Students in CollegePlus and similar programs have discovered schools such as Liberty University and Thomas Edison State College, which award fully accredited bachelors, masters, and even some doctoral degrees to students who never set foot in a classroom.

My own story, and those of thousands of my generation, started with finding myself in high school, intimidated by how big the whole college question was. I thought about going to school locally, like my parents had. I thought about paying an arm and a leg to attend private school where I could get a conservative environment. I thought about skipping the whole process entirely and going the way of Jobs, Gates, and Zuckerberg to start a business without needing anybody’s piece of paper to validate my self-taught education.

I decided to do none of those.

Instead, I took the initiative in high school with CLEP Tests and DSST exams. I researched institutions that offered accredited degrees for online study. When I graduated from high school, I never went “off to college” because I was already a senior in college.

I started work full time at a job directly relevant to my field (professional conservative activism, actually), continued my online classes, and geared up for law school. Not only was the cost a fraction of what it would have been to attend on campus for four years, I was able to start my doctorate without debt at 19 and continue working.

In the end, conservative young people of my generation have a multitude of options. There is nothing wrong with getting the traditional college experience if that is the best fit.

Show post
Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

There’s a ridiculous rumor in the Church today that Jesus is humble. What a laugh. Jesus is anything but humble, and He is clearly demonstrating His love of glory by the way He basks in Self-exaltation. The Holy One, the True One—these fancy titles are lofty compliments that Jesus is paying to Himself. He keeps reminding everyone that He is Mr. Awesome. Well, of course He is—He’s God Almighty, and our Gods have no use for downplaying Their own magnificence. They have extremely high opinions of Themselves and They broadcast those opinions without hesitation.

Show post
Amanda Marie Warfel #racist rawstory.com

A Pennsylvania woman hurled racial slurs at neighbors who complained about her furniture-shaking “loud sex.”

Amanda Marie Warfel was charged with two misdemeanor counts of disorderly conduct and one count of harassment after the neighbors complained about the racist abuse, reported the York Dispatch.

The neighbor called police March 21 to complain that Warfel was “loudly fornicating and banging around her bedroom to the degree that the victim’s dresser and her own bed shook,” according to court documents.

Tanya Saylor told police she asked Warfel to quiet down because her teenage daughters had school in the morning, but she said the woman screamed at them through a common wall and became even louder.

“They don’t sleep well at night,” said Saylor, who is white but whose husband is black. “There’s constantly inappropriate things that go on in her bedroom.”

Saylor said she’s tried talking to Warfel and her grandmother for months about the noise, but she called police after the dispute escalated.

“She starts calling my children n*****s and monkeys, and offers them bananas,” Saylor said. “It was a daily thing until she went to prison.”

Saylor complained Feb 17 that Warfel was banging on the wall and yelling at her, and she called Feb. 28 to report that Warfel was screaming racial slurs and obscenities at her.

Warfel was charged at that time with ethnic intimidation, harassment and disorderly conduct, but the ethnic intimidation charge was later withdrawn as part of a plea agreement.

A judge sentenced Warfel, who was on probation for a prior felony prison assault, to 45 to 90 days in jail.

Show post
Jim #fundie blog.jim.com

Kathy Forth offed herself, leaving a lengthy suicide note in which she accused numerous men of sexually harassing her, and the entire society of ignoring this terrible sexual harassment, thereby driving her to suicide.

Fat, pushing forty, and supposedly suffers unbearable amounts of sexual assault.

Back when she was hot, the amount of sexual assault she suffered was entirely bearable.

All women love drama, all women create drama, and all women create drama because they are looking for a spanking from a strong man. All women are like that. Childlessness and the lack of a strong man in their lives greatly worsens this problem.

Not all women make false accusations of sexual harassment, not all women kill themselves, but all disruptively create drama and problems: The ones not under the authority of an alpha male, and the ones that have remained childless while their fertility is running out, create more disruption, more drama, and more problems.

They are all cruising for a spanking, every single one.

All the sides in this debate that are permitted within the Overton Window are the same insane side. Scott is evil, depraved, decadent, and insane, #metoo is even more evil and more insane, and the fat old cat lady who offed herself was ridiculous, hilarious, evil, sinful and insane, her over the top evil, and her over the top vanity being hilariously funny to any sane person. Any remotely sane person commenting on that reddit thread gets instabanned. Anyone who manages to post twice on that thread is evil or insane, and most likely both. That thread is a conversation in the lunatic asylum.

Every woman lusts for drama. Fat, and pushing forty, people were ignoring her: Men were ignoring her. So she decided to go out in a blaze of glory, the ultimate “Hey look at me” opera, a gigantic soap opera of martyrdom.

Kathy Forth was evil and spent her life ruining other people’s lives out of depraved, foolish, and ridiculous sexual lust.

It is normal, and indeed universal, for childless unowned women who are fertile age, or not very long past fertile age, to destructively and self destructively destroy their social and organizational environment, burn the family assets, disrupt the business, divorce, etc. Kathy took this to extremes.

All Women Are Like That. Kathy more than others.

When a woman creates drama she is unconsciously, and in Kathy’s case quite consciously, hoping to smoke the alpha male out of hiding so that he will take possession of her and give her a spanking. She flat out tells us in her suicide note. In her suicide note she tells of her fantasies for powerful alpha male to take possession of her, to own her, to command her, supposedly in order to protect her from all this supposedly terrible sexual harassment.

This is what female lust looks like. It is not genitally focused like male lust, but that does not make it better, it makes it worse. Much worse.

During her fertile years, a lustful woman is not funny. Past fertile age, a lustful childless woman is hilarious.

Not every woman makes false rape and false sexual harassment allegations, but every woman acts disruptively, every unowned fertile age woman acts more disruptively and causes great damage, childless unowned women even more so, and childless unowned women continue doing so well past fertile age, while women with children calm down as their fertile period ends, particularly women who have previously experienced the firm hand of the father of their children.

Show post
Janet bloomfield #fundie judgybitch.com

Drunk chick gets in car with man she doesn’t know to do a line of coke, ends up getting raped.Totally didn’t see that coming!Utterly shocked that Grand Jury won’t indict!The state of rape in the USA.


Every time I write a piece about rape, I think to myself, “okay, that’s it. I am done with this subject”.But then I run across stories like this one and I just can’t…..

http://www.vice.com/read/i-got-raped-then-my-problems-started

Here is the story, quick and dirty:Gina Tron goes to a bar to meet some friends and she gets drunk.Some guy she doesn’t know is there, but she assumes he is with the group.He’s lean and swarthy and has a “disconnected” look in his eyes.He makes her nervous. But then he offers her cocaine, and hey, cocaine!She sets aside all her misgivings, and gets in the car with a guy she doesn’t know, who makes her nervous and who is “disconnected”.

[img]https://i1.wp.com/judgybitch.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2013/07/coke.jpg?resize=300%2C168[/img]

Because cocaine?

What the fuck, Gina. Seriously. What the fuck are you doing?Gina ends up locked in the car with this guy, they drive to his apartment, she goes with him and whatever happened next, Gina considers it rape.She is transfixed by the 666 tattoo across his abdomen, and based on how Gina describes the guy, it’s a complete and utter shock that he would have such a thing, right?

He said, she said. Okay.Whatever Gina.

You know what kills me about this case?That three other women report the same thing happened to them. THREE!There are at least three women who are so unconcerned with their own safety and well-being, they put themselves in the exact same situation.

Parts of Gina’s story are bizarre, too.She went to the guy’s apartment.She knows where he lives.Why does she need to spend hours looking at mug-shots then?So she can ID him and then find out where he lives?She KNOWS where he lives.It makes no sense.

[img]https://i1.wp.com/judgybitch.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2013/07/grand-jury.jpg?resize=286%2C176[/img]

And she claims the defence attorney had incriminating character evidence against her at the Grand Jury trial, except Grand Jury trials don’t have defence attorneys and there is no cross-examination of any kind.The Grand Jury just considers whether there is the tiniest shred of evidence to have the case proceed to trial.In Gina’s case, the answer was nope.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment

The other two women who were allegedly assaulted by the same man declined to take part in the trial.

Let’s just assume for one moment that Gina is telling the god’s honest truth and the story played out exactly as she said.The commenters at Vice, and at Slate, where Amanda Marcotte (big surprise!) picked up the story use the same analogy over and over again:


Someone’s new car gets stolen, and the police respond that having a nice, new car is just asking for someone to steal it. A man walks down the street in an expensive suit. When he gets robbed, the officer tells him that his outfit was just a come-on for thieves, and, besides, he had been seen giving money away, and how did anyone know for sure that he didn’t give his money to the thief and just change his mind about it later.Dea Henrich

If a man is walking down the street in a $10000 suit wearing a Rolex watch and someone jumps him and robs him, no one ever says it was not robbery because he “wanted it.” They never say it was HIS fault for dressing in a way to indicate he had wealth worth taking. If he is counting hundred dollar bills while walking down the street and gets mugged they don’t say it was not a crime because his actions led the attacker on. Nor do they dredge up things like, he likes to play poker therefore he has a history of willingly losing money. If someone steals a car they don’t declare it’s not stolen because the owner did not defend himself and fight back hard enough.Ethan Wallace

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/07/01/gina_tron_tried_to_put_her_brooklyn_rapist_behind_bars_but_was_abused_by.html?wpisrc=flyouts

Really?Let’s take a look at that, shall we?

[img]https://i1.wp.com/judgybitch.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2013/07/bu.jpg?resize=275%2C183[/img]

Here’s a story from Boston University that is roughly parallel.

A research assistant from the BU Medical Campus was stabbed, punched, and robbed of an iPad by two assailants at 8:32 p.m. Tuesday at the corner of Pleasant Street and Browne Street in Brookline. The victim, a 30-year-old postdoctoral fellow, was treated at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for two superficial stab wounds.

http://www.bu.edu/today/2013/researcher-stabbed-in-brookline-robbery/

Yikes!Stabbed for an iPad.That seems a little harsh.Surely the commenters at the Boston U story are calling for the criminal to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and offering their heartfelt condolences to the victim.

Hmmm

Looks like maybe not.

When you move out of on-campus housing, this is a risk you have to expect. Instead of blaming BU, students should learn not to walk with their iDevices out and their heads buried in them. All of the people that nearly slam into me everyday with their head mashed in their phones become prime targets at night when they walk down dark side-streets that way.Anonymous on 01.30.2013 at 8:00 am

I’m born and raised from Boston (not outside of Boston, the inner city of Boston) and when I hear about these things happening it doesn’t surprise me. Inner city kids know that a lot of wealthy kids go to BU. They know that students have laptops and electronics on them. Automatically you are talented. I grew up surrounded by this mentality.

The point is, all of us students need to be smart and aware of our surroundings. Don’t walk alone at night. Don’t have your cell phone in your hand or out at all. Walk swift and with a purpose. If you see people walking towards you, cross the street. Don’t keep your hood up so you can keep your peripheral vision.

Street smarts people. If you aren’t from a city, start learning them.Local Girl on 01.30.2013 at 5:32 pm

Just because we “shouldn’t have to be afraid” of getting mugged doesn’t mean we shouldn’t take precautions ourselves. You certainly won’t see me walking around with my nose buried in my iPhone or iPad (not that we know that was the case with this robbery, but still). I value those possessions and value my safety, so I can wait to tweet or send that text until I get home. Of course having these things out of sight will not guarantee I don’t get mugged, but it certainly makes me look like less of an easy target.BU Student with Common Sense on 01.30.2013 at 1:51 pm

What, exactly, is it about demonstrating just one iota of common sense that feminists hate so much?What part of “don’t get in a car and do coke with a guy who makes you uneasy and who is completely unknown to you” is unfair or unreasonable to expect?

I think Amanda’s spin on the story is rather revealing:

Women, it turns out, are in a perpetual state of consent unless they bring weapons to bars and are able to wield those weapons against rapists who have made it clear that they are willing to beat you into submission.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/07/01/gina_tron_tried_to_put_her_brooklyn_rapist_behind_bars_but_was_abused_by.html?wpisrc=flyouts#

[

Excellent suggestion, Amanda.Bring a weapon.The one located between your ears is probably the best bet:your BRAIN!!Do you fucking have one?

The Grand Jury refused to indict in this case because it defies the imagination that anyone could be so utterly, implausibly stupid.As soon as your story starts with, “well, I went out with this guy I never met before to do coke in his car”, everything else you have to say loses all credibility.

And apparently, a lot of women who recount their “rapes” to police will often do so in a way that invites police to think they are crazy, stupid, and probably lying.


When Tom Tremblay started working for the police department of Burlington, Vt., 30 years ago, he discovered that many of his fellow cops rarely believed a rape victim. This was true time after time, in dozens of cases. Tremblay could see why they were doubtful once he started interviewing the victims himself. The victims, most of them women, often had trouble recalling an attack or couldn’t give a chronological account of it. Some expressed no emotion. Others smiled or laughed as they described being assaulted.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/why_cops_don_t_believe_rape_victims_and_how_brain_science_can_solve_the.html

Rebecca Ruiz, writing at Slate, goes on to explore how neurobiology explains the way women recount their rapes, comparing rape to PTSD or the kinds of trauma torture victims endure.It’s all very compelling information, chock full of fancy medical terms and explanations that sound tickety-boo.Women don’t lie about rape because SCIENCE!

In the past decade, neurobiology has evolved to explain why victims respond in ways that make it seem like they could be lying, even when they’re not. Using imaging technology, scientists can identify which parts of the brain are activated when a person contemplates a traumatic memory such as sexual assault. The brain’s prefrontal cortex—which is key to decision-making and memory—often becomes temporarily impaired. The amygdala, known to encode emotional experiences, begins to dominate, triggering the release of stress hormones and helping to record particular fragments of sensory information. Victims can also experience tonic immobility—a sensation of being frozen in place—or a dissociative state. These types of withdrawal result from extreme fear yet often make it appear as if the victim did not resist the assault.

But there is another explanation for fractured memories and laughter and total lack of credibility:women are not necessarily LYING about the fact they think they were raped, but they are nervous as hell about the fact that they did not take one single reasonable precaution to avoid putting themselves in a dangerous situation. Perhaps the “traumatic memory” they are recalling is just how brainless and idiotic they were in the first place.

Perhaps Tron really WAS raped, and perhaps the jury really did refuse to indict a serial rapist:I don’t live in Brooklyn, but even if I did, it wouldn’t frighten me to know this man was loose in the least.Why not?

I don’t do coke, and I sure as hell would not get in a car with a man I don’t know who makes me nervous.

See how easy that is?I value myself.It’s really that simple.When feminism insists that no woman should ever be required to consider her own safety and her own actions and only rapists should be held responsible for rape, they are essentially asking women to discount their own value.Don’t consider yourself smart, capable, sensible, rational or in any way responsible for yourself.

This is why I don’t understand why any woman would embrace feminism.Feminism doesn’t just hate men, IT HATES WOMEN.What kind of philosophy rests on the assumption that women are incapable of taking the tiniest measures to protect themselves? That it is somehow unfair if women are asked to observe their environments, make a rational assessment of threats, believe themselves capable of avoiding potential harm and deserving of their own protection?RationalCapableDeserving

Perhaps the reason so many women are floundering in their lives and suffering existential angst is because they have bought the story feminism is peddling:women are irrational, incapable and undeserving.Victims.Always victims.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8251259/Women-in-crisis-as-depression-fuels-binge-drinking-and-sex-research.html

The only definite thing Tron is a victim of is her own colossal idiocy.


Don’t take car rides from strangers.Every five year old knows this.How does anyone grow up to think car rides from strangers mixed with drunkenness and some cocaine is a good idea? No one deserves to be assaulted, but holy hell!

When five year olds show more sense than grown women, you know we have a problem.

And the solution is fairly simple:grow up ladies.You can make better choices.Really. Give it a try.Believe you are capable.Believe you are rational.Believe you are deserving.Because you are, no matter what your Daily Feminist Blogger tells you.

And remember, only do coke with people you know!

Lots of love,

JB

Show post
Chris Freind #fundie blogs.phillymag.com

Shaming isn’t the total panacea, but it must be an integral part of the solution. There’s no better example of how shame can change perceptions than smoking, which was once considered cool but is now viewed with utter disdain. Sure, cigarettes are expensive, but that’s not why smoking is down. It’s because society made a conscious effort to shame smokers. Try lighting up in a bar with co-workers, and you receive dagger-like stares. Do it outside, and people immediately move away, because smoking is regarded as disgusting, and therefore, the smoker must be, too.

Smoking kills, and we have no problem pointing out that as a deterrent. Yet so does obesity, and we still hesitate to mention it. Just as non-smokers are picking up the tab for the massive medical costs related to smoking, non-overweight people are subsidizing the obese since it is “discriminatory” to charge differently for health care (though a section of the Affordable Care Act would change that).

But shaming is now taboo, and no one is ever at fault or accountable for his actions. Consider:

• It used to be, when a student received a detention, they weren’t just shamed in front of their classmates. They knew they had to tell their parents, which would invariably trigger another punishment.

Contrast that to the reaction this week to a New Jersey principal’s letter to parents about pictures of their underage children on Facebook holding alcohol bottles. Instead of thanking the principal for bringing that situation to their attention, a number of parents ripped him.

• Airlines have attempted to charge double for obese passengers whose girth extends beyond the armrests. While this is clearly commonsense, since not doing so penalizes paying passengers of normal weight, such policies are met with scorn and even lawsuits by those lobbying for obesity-without-consequence.

• And since it would be considered “discriminatory” to have an obese-only section in stadiums, seats are being made wider to accommodate overly plump posteriors. And when seats are wider, there are fewer of them. Who pays? You do. The same way that the non-obese eat the cost of new toilets that must be installed with ground supports, as the standard wall-mounted commodes can no longer bear the weight of America’s fat brigade.

We have coddled ourselves so much that we have shamed using shame. As a result, people have become clueless to their appearance. Sure, what’s under the skin matters, and no one should feel that obese people are bad, but what’s on the outside counts, too. Or at least it should. But go to any beach, and count how many linebacker-sized women are showcasing themselves in bikinis. Ditto for men whose guts reach the next block. Since they all have mirrors, one can only assume that shame is simply not a part of their lives.

Should we have scarlet letters for the obese? Of course not, since there is no problem identifying them. But we should employ shame to shed light on an issue that affects us all, in the same way that some judges order drunk drivers to place “Convicted DUI” bumper stickers on their cars.

And speaking of cars, how shameful is it that overweight people are not just guzzling food, but fuel? A recent report calculated that one billion gallons of gasoline are wasted every year (one percent of the nation’s total) just to haul Americans’ extra pounds. And given that the average American weighs 24 more pounds than in 1960, airlines are using roughly 175 million more gallons of jet fuel per year just to accommodate the overweight. That’s downright shameful.

And if not shame, then what? Do we tax fast food? Soda? Candy? Do we regulate portion size? No. Not only are such ideas preposterous and unenforceable, but they are tactics, not strategy. It’s time to tip the scales against obesity and solve the problem.

Otherwise, we will soon find out that the “elephant in the room” isn’t a pachyderm at all.

It’s an average American.

Show post
various MRAs #sexist reddit.com

Re: male feminist actively working to lower his son's sense of self worth

image

(bufedad)
This is great, an entire generation of men raised to not help women, unless women come asking for it?

That's great, it's chipping away at women's privilege a little bit at a time.

(SirSausagePants)
What makes it even better, is that a lot of women expect a man to offer help automatically.

(bufedad)
Remember the news article about the attack on the subway train, and the two guys didn't help?

Did she ask them for help?

No. She didn't, so she had no right to expect their help.

This is going to be fucking great.

I've seen women stranded on the side of the road, and I won't stop to help them. It's just not worth the risk these days.

(karatdem)
If I see a woman who looks woke and independent, I make an effort to not help her even when I get the instinct to do it. I had one situation when the woman even looked at me expecting my help and I looked back at her kind of like saying: "what?".

If she is woke and independent, she is woke and independent for everything.

(Brohemond)
I just don't help women unless they are friends or family.

Stranger women are so off my radar it isn't funny.

(Moonboots606)
I have stopped holding the door for women. Nothing is more infuriating than a rude woman that expects that sort of treatment but doesn't have the common decency to even mutter a simple thank you. That has become all too common for me lately and I'm slowly breaking that habit that's been ingrained in me as a child.

(HeForeverBleeds)
Misandric people should not be allowed to raise boys. This is emotional abuse, plain and simple

(BlueOrange22)
Does this go both ways, or is it "different" when she interjects to him?

(jacksleepshere)
What a fucking gimp, teaching your son not to help people because it's sexist to help women...

(Razorbladekandyfan)
He is teaching him not to insert himself, not to stop being a disposable utility. When his utility is needed, you better believe the father will tell him to act.

(CounterfeitMemes)
So he's there to receive orders? This also goes beyond "teaching him not to insert himself." As soon as you use a word that's clearly gendered and loaded with connotation and sexist baggage like "mansplaining," then you're no longer in the realm of just teaching your son not to be rude.

(Yoji_84)
In a few years he'll be on on this kid's ass because he isn't 'proactively helpful'.

And the kid seems to be a good kid.

(Alphonetic)
Ok. Hope he feels good about himself when his kids grow up and have shitty relationships because his son is too afraid of hurting the woman’s feelings to help her and his daughter scares guys away because of her misplaced sense of independence. *Hope it doesn’t turn out that way, but since he used the term “mansplain,” I doubt his ability. Aside from that, I find it funny how he doesn’t point out the age of the kids. An older sibling always helps a younger sibling, regardless of sex.

(c_megalodon25)
This isn’t mansplaining. This is older sibling trying to take over what younger sibling is doing. My 10 year old daughter pulls this same shit on my 7 year old son. As a parent, you try to stop it, but it’s not specific to gender.

(hauntedskin)
That's what I hate about "mansplaining"; it's injecting sex into something that isn't necessarily specific to either sex, especially when we already have perfectly serviceable sex-neutral terms, such as patronising, back seat gaming, and ultracrepidarian.

I would have just as much issue if people tried to coin "womoaning" for women complaining about things, as though both sexes don't do that.

Show post
Anna Diehl #fundie 924jeremiah.wordpress.com

If you are serious about pleasing God in life, you need to discard this ridiculous notion of self-help. While people say you are a powerhouse of potential who just needs to learn how to flip on your own switch, God says you’re an impotent dot of a creature who can’t do bumpkus without Him. Self-help encourages a mentality of self-reliance and autonomy. Such a focus is going to lead you far astray from where you need to be.

The truth is that you don’t get any say about how sweet your experience of this world will be. God is the One calling the shots in your life whether you acknowledge Him or not. He is the One controlling your circumstances, health, and overall comfort. God says that the only choice you really have is in deciding how much you’re going to submit to Him in life. He doesn’t make any promises that if you submit to Him, He’ll respond by making your life one big bowl of pitted cherries. God isn’t into this tit for tat game that we humans are so fond of. He doesn’t say, “If you toss five bucks into the offering plate Sunday morning, I’ll respond by giving you $500.” He says, “I’m the King. I give commands, not suggestions. If you defy Me, I’m going to make you very sorry.”

Show post
metmom #fundie freerepublic.com

There’s one thing that people like evos/atheists just can’t seem to understand: religion and science do not stand equal before the Constitution. Of the two, one, and only one, is enumerated.

Show post
Ellen Granfield #fundie theestablishment.co

One of the most obvious examples of scientism today is the theory of evolution, which is still upheld as the dominant explanation of how life generates itself. The problem is that biologists still can’t answer the most basic of questions involved, including the origin of life itself, sexual reproduction, or how species originate.

Mainstream science – despite declaring again and again that this theory explains these functions – in truth merely describes biological phenomena involved in ecosystem diversity.

The political fight over curriculum between religious Fundamentalists and neo-Darwinists has pushed any meaningful discussion of this topic off the table, as mainstream science remains stubbornly fearful of giving up ground if they admit that there are serious controversies raging around the theory of evolution as the catch-all explanation for our current existence.

It leaves no room for the possibility of Intelligent Design Theory, which posits “certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause.” IDT is often made synonymous with creationism – neo-Darwinists argue that it’s just Creationism in disguise – but there are many scientists and philosophers alike that believe IDT is just as compelling a theory as evolution for “the way things are.”

There are many exciting studies in earth sciences, published by pioneers like Hywel Williams and Timothy Lenton, which deepen our understanding of the planet as a microbial biosphere capable of generating enormously complex systems, however.

The field of science is ripe with compelling counternarratives to evolution that we’re choosing to ignore, from the symbiosis between microbes and minerals that together formed earth’s diversity as shown by Robert Hazen, to Tyler Volk’s understanding of bacteria using metapatterns to generate themselves into ever more complex life, to species diversity that stabilize living ecosystems.

There’s also Lewis Thomas‘ theory that humanity could be a complex form of microbial life the planet produced in order to seed itself into the solar system.

We stand at the frontier of a whole new field of science if we suspend our egos and become willing to alter our perspectives – and perhaps fallacious beliefs – in order to pursue a greater understanding of our species and our role on Earth.

Another example of scientism is the continued definition of the heart as nothing more than a mechanical pump, giving the brain all the credit for who and what we are – the home of our soul, as it were.

Doing so means holding on to the linear, reductionist view of a mechanical universe which reduces life to mere quantifiable parts in spite of the latest heart research that is producing a perspective vital in finding a reconnection with something western society has lost.

As nature writer Stephen Buhner eloquently illustrates in his book The Secret Teachings of Plants, it’s now believed that when we stop thinking and start feeling with the heart, our physiological functioning becomes more balanced and calm; neuronal discharge in the brain comes into phase with the heart and lungs in a process called heart coherence.

More than half our heart cells are neural, the heart’s nervous system wired to the brain’s amygdala, thalamus, hippocampus, and cortex. The heart has its own memory and is the primary organ of sense; the brain is secondary and responsive.

We feel the world first, but when we believe – and are told, again and again – that the brain is the center of our being, our perception of our humanity and the world becomes stymied.

Understanding the heart’s neural connections within the brain and how these areas deal with emotional memories, sensory experience, spatial relationships and meaning, problem solving, reasoning, and learning, we’re better equipped to understand that feelings come through the heart and body, whereas emotions come from thoughts that play through our minds (often like a broken record).

One affects us, the other has an effect on us. It’s a slippery slope to follow, and mainstream science is leading the way by continuing to claim the brain is the end all and be all.

Show post
Roger Plumrose #sexist human-stupidity.com

The whole medicalization of mens’ attraction to adolescent girls is just a joke. Take a look at what sells the most in the sex industries: TEENAGE GIRLS. SCHOOLGIRLS. LOLITAS. JAILBAIT.

Sexual preferences for adolescent girls are clearly the norm for men not sexual disorders or so called “paraphilias”

Show post
Grant #fundie writeinjesus.org

Jesus Wins!

This just in, all across the country, today, people have elected Jesus to be their Lord. Jesus wins! What a tremendous victory in the Kingdom of God.

As far as I know, Jesus was not elected Mayor, Governor, Senator, or anything else on November 2nd. I’m not actually sure anyone voted for him at all. But that doesn’t make him a loser and it doesn’t make this site meaningless (a little silly, maybe). The point was never for Jesus to actually be elected. I’m not sure he wants to be the ruler of any man-made position in our governments.

But can you imagine it? Imagine a little town with two corrupt politicians running for Mayor. Out of their wits and out of their options, the people write in Jesus of Nazareth and he wins. What would they do? Would they go on about their way, acting as though he were as tangible as our wives or husbands or parents or friends? Can you imagine the swearing-in ceremony? I picture a silly situation where a Judge, the Honerable, holding a Bible, asks Jesus to put his right hand on it and swear to tell the truth and uphold justice. How can we ask the definition of truth and justice to swear by them? Can we swear by ourselves?

But I digress and start to daydream.

The position Jesus is to have in our lives as Christians is greater than the position held by our Judges, Mayors, Governors, Senators, and even Presidents. His Kingship is more intimate than all these and more supreme. If we cannot imagine him as our President, how can we imagine him as our Lord?

When I next go to vote, I will cast two votes. One ethereal from my heart and the other tangible with my hand. Both will be the write-in candidate Jesus of Nazareth.

Show post
David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

The term "holidays or “holy days” essentially means "hell" days or “heel” days, for they mark the time that the underworld (hell), experiences the wrath of the Roman Empire’s heel or boot. During Roman times, holy days were referred to as "Feriae" (F+R), meaning “Four” days or “Fear” days (i.e., the number 4 is a sacred Roman number and is most often depicted as a cross), as both animal and human alike were routinely slaughtered for sport and sacrafice. Roman holy days were defined by the Roman scholar and writer Marcus Terentius Varro as "days instituted for the sake of the gods”. Roman religious rites were performed on the “feriae”, public business was suspended, and slaves were to be given some form of rest.

Roman Calendar
According to modern historical sources, festivals in ancient Rome were an important part of Roman religious life and one of the primary features of the Roman calendar. The first days of each Roman month were allegedly entitled Kalends or Kalendae which is where the English word "calendar" was untimely derived from. The term Kalendae (K+L+N+D) meaning “Killing Day”, essentially morphed into the word “calendar” which can be translated literally to “Killing Day of Rome” as the letter “R” always equates to Rome. In other words, the Roman calendar was the schedule of killings which was celebrated with lavish feasts, ceremonies and public spectacles.

Roman Religion = Jewish Religion
Aside from the Hollywood films and television shows entitled “Roman Holiday” (1953) and “The Roman Holidays” (1972), Roman holy days are celebrated in the underworld in modern times by the Jewish people through their counterfeit religion of Judaism whose holy days reflects almost exectly, the dates, festivals, sacrifices and rituals of the Roman Empire. Although the names have been altered, the dates and meaning behind the two religions is the same and therefore the Jewish people unwittingly execute the Roman's dirty work in the underworld. Of the 12 major Jewish holidays (see list below), each one coincides in some way with a Roman holiday, regardless of the fact that the dates change from year to year. So unless the Jews are Romans, which they obviously are not, there is no explicable reason why over 90% of all Jewish holidays fall on Roman holidays and vice versa. In other words, unless the Romans designed the Jewish religion to mirror their own religion, down to every single date and detail, there is no logical explanation for this phenomenon. Therefore, in order to guarantee that Roman holy days are continually celebrated with human sacrifices (i.e., assassinations, terror attacks and war) in the underworld, the dates and meanings of the Jewish holy days must be exactly the same as the Romans, which they are. As the Bible verse Matthew 6:10 explains, "Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven (Greenland)".

Star of David
The Star of David, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David, is widely recognized as the symbol of Jewish identity and Judaism. It is shaped in the form of a hexagon, a 6-pointed star that is formed by the compound of two equilateral triangles. The number 6 is a favorite esoteric number of Rome which is most commonly associated with death and destruction. The name “David” (D+V+D) means "Divide" and the therefore the "Star of David" means the "Star of Steer of the Divide". In other words, the Jewish people are steered by Rome to keep the peolple divided amoungst themselves, but more importantly, to keep the divide between upper Earth (Greenland) and the underworld (hell). The hexagon is significant because through the use and abuse of the Jewish people, Rome has effectively put a hex (curse) or a hoax on all of mankind. The two opposing triangles depicted in the Star of David (see below) can be taken quite literally as what is ordered by Rome in Greenland is reflected and executed in the underworld by the Jewish people through the main Roman proxy state of Switzerland.

[Selected DCT analysis of Jewish holy days below.]

Hanukkah
Hanukkah, widely known as the Feast of Dedication, is an 8-day Jewish holiday allegedly commemorating the rededication of the Holy Temple (e.g., the Second Temple) in Jerusalem, regardless of the fact that all aspects which pertain to temples and temple building (e.g., arches, columns, domes, etc.,) are Greco-Roman in nature. In reality, Hanukkah is likely a counterfeit Roman holyday created to commemorate the ceremonies, rituals and human sacrifices associated with Rome’s new temple in either Sicily (i.e., the Second Temple; the First Temple being built in either Crete or Athens, Greece) or the third and final temple which was built in Greenland (most likely Thule) just prior to the alleged fall of the RomanEmpire. In 2013, the Jewish holy days of Hanukkah are celebrated on November 27-December 5. Coincidentally, the Roman temple ceremonies of Neptune and Pietas are held on December 1; the celebration of the Roman goddess Bona Dea are held on December 3; and the Roman country festival for Faunus held by the pagi is celebrated on December 5. In 2013, Hanukkah is celebrated on December 16-24. Coincidentally, Saturnalia, which is held in honor of Saturn with the public ritual on December 17 is celebrated by the Romans from December 17-23; the holy day of Opalia is celebrated in honor of the Roman god Ops on December 19; the Romans celebrate Divalia in honor of Angerona on December 21; the Roman sacrifice to Hercules and Ceres is also given on the December 21 which also coincides with the Winter Solstice (e.g., years 2013, 2014, 2016); the Roman anniversary of the Temple of the Lares Permarini in the Porticus Minucia is celebrated December 22, which also coincides with the Winter Solstice in 2015; the Roman holy day of Sigillaria, the last day of the Saturnalia which is devoted to gift (poison) giving, is celebrated a day later on December 23; Larentalia, which commemorates the Roman temples of Diana and Juno Regina in the Circus Flaminius is also celebrated on December 23; and finally, Tempestates, the Roman god of weather is also celebrated on December 23.

Passover
The Passover is a 7-day Jewish festival held to commemorate the Jewish people’s alleged liberation over 3,300 years ago by God from slavery in ancient Egypt, as well as the birth of their nation under the leadership of Moses. In reality, the Passover is likely a counterfeit Roman holiday created to commemorate Rome’s liberation from the underworld by G.O.D. (Greenland of Denmark) as they “passed over” from the bottom side (the dark side) of the Earth to the top side (the sunny side). In 2013, the Jewish Passover is held from April 3-11 which coincidentally bookends the Roman games of Ludi Megalenses or Megalesia, which occurs on April 4-10 in honor of the Magna Mater or Cybele, a Greco-Roman goddess. In 2014, the Jewish Passover is held from April 14-22. Coincidentally, the Roman holy day of Fordicidia is celebrated with offering of a pregnant cow is sacrificed to Tellus ("Earth") on April 15, also known as “Tax Day” in America. Coincidentally, the modern holiday known as Earth Day is celebrated annually a week later on April 22. The Roman festival Parilia in honor of Pales and the dies natalis of Rome also falls within the 2014 Jewish Passover on April 21.

Sukkot
Sukkot, known as the “Feast of Tabernacles”, is a mandated Jewish festival which allegedly commemorates when the Hebrews were commanded to make a pilgrimage to the Temple in Jerusalem. In reality, Sukkot is likely a counterfeit Roman holy day created to celebrate the mandate by Rome to all of its chosen people to make the pilgrimage from the underworld to Greenland in order to escape the aforementioned Days of Judgment which were slated to befall the underworld. The term “Sukkot” (S+K+T) likely means “System Military Base”, as KT is the name of a Roman military base. In all likelihood, Sukkot was a mandate by Rome to all of its top military personal located around the world to instantly retreat back to Rome. Once there, they made the voyage to Greenland where they have waged war on humanity ever since. In 2012, Sukkot was celebrated by the Jews on September 30-October 8. Coincidentally, the Roman ceremonies for Fides and the Tigillum Sororium are celebrated on October 1 while the Roman Ludi Augustales, which was established 14 AD after the death of Augustus and based on the Augustalia, is celebrated on October 3-12. The Leiunium Cereris, a day of Roman fasting in honor of Ceres is celebrated on October 4; the Roman mundus (tomb) was opened on October 5; and the Roman holy day entitled dies ater ("black day") to mark the anniversary of the battle of Arausio (105 BC) is celebrated on October 6; In 2012, Sukko also celebrated on October 7 which is coincidentally the same date that Rome celebrates the rites for the god of Jupiter which is represented by a lightning bolt and an eagle, the most common symbols of the Roman army. October 7 is also the same date that Rome celebrates the goddess of Juno which represents the fullness of vital force. In essence, Simchat Torah is a day which celebrates the endless cycle of war. In 2013, Sukkot is celebrated on September 18-28. Coincidentally, the Ludi Romani or Ludi Magni, "the oldest and most famous" of the Roman games, were held annually on September 5-19, while the “mercatus" and “Latona” set aside for markets and fairs commenced immediately following the Ludi Romani is celebrated on September 20–23.

Show post
michaelsuede #fundie libertariannews.org

Punishing someone that hasn’t hurt anyone or damaged anyone else’s property by their actions is wrong.

The State does far more damage to the public through the outlawing of literally harmless actions than it prevents in potential damages and lives lost. We must consider that the money taken from a DUI offender may have been used to purchase medication, healthcare, or any other number of life saving or extending goods or services.

When calculating how effective DUI laws actually are, one must consider ONLY THE MARGINAL DECREASE in drunk driving that occurs by having the law in place – this number is relatively small. Most people who drive drunk think they are OK to drive and will not get caught, thus the law itself does nothing to deter them from driving at the time they make the decision to get behind the wheel.

The public must be treated as adults and be given the adult responsibility to decide on their own if they are capable of driving without hurting themselves or anyone else. The State should not play the role of the nanny looter.

At a cost of 20 billion dollars a year, society can not afford to enforce yet another victimless law.

Crimes must have victims to be just.

DUI laws combined with the “war on drugs” are pissing 10% of the value of the entire M1 money supply down the gutter every year for the prevention of 400 deaths.

This is like invading two countries every year.

The combined annual cost of the war in Afghanistan AND the war in Iraq is 140 billion a year. We spend around that much enforcing DUI and drug laws.

Show post
ChinoF #sexist getrealphilippines.com

Some Thoughts on LGBT Issues after the Colorado Baker’s Win

Lately, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the baker in Colorado who refused to bake a cake for a same-sex couple isn’t liable for anything. The ruling left the question of whether it was bordering on religious discrimination. But for me, it isn’t. Establishments have the right to refuse to give service to customers for their own reasons. It’s not the same as hanging a “No Filipinos/no gays allowed” sign, which could be argued as more like discrimination. But this probably will get the LGBTs fuming, with the SJWs among claiming that it’s “oppression of the state,” or other baloney like that. I thus would like to consider the other side, something like the side of Zaxx’s article, where he discusses negative effects of some LGBT attitudes.

A couple I know in church who’d been traveling to other congregations related that pastors had asked them topic suggestions for sermons. The couple said, just look at TV. Broken families, switching partners, making crime look good, and more. And one example they talked of at length was a gay beauty pageant on TV. During an interview, the contestant was asked if he had a boyfriend. “Yes.” Where is he? “With his wife.” Oh, wait, isn’t there a problem with that? “No, because his wife is OK with it.” Jumping in is this famous actress acting as judge: “I’m so proud of you for standing what you believe in!”

Cringe.

Other gays are not that lucky. Some straight guys just flat out refuse. They’re straight, for crying out loud! But the gay person might feel slighted. Life’s wisdom tells us, it’s part of life to be spurned, but the gay will not accept it. So what might he do? Some gays might take revenge in some way against the straight guy. They might stalk or harass the straight guy, like immature spurned teens would do. Others might try to “out” the straight guy as a gay, although that’s a lie. But in doing so, he commits defamation and harassment.

Since suicide has become a topic in social media after Anthony Bourdain’s death, I’ll just give it a little controversial link to my topic. Let’s say an LGBT person commits suicide after they become spurned by someone. The reaction might be, “the spurner is a bigot,” “the suicide is his fault,” and all sorts of trolling and bullying. But no, these are wrong. Unless the spurner or another person was caught on record to have actually encouraged suicide, there is no fault with them. Better to research the person’s background for the complex web of reasons that led to it – including the person’s own decisions. I will also make that controversial point later – that people with mental illness are not always victims, but could possibly have brought it upon themselves. But back to the current topic.

Let me recall the case of Jeffrey Laude. One of the local ladyboys who was killed by a visiting American soldier, in a situation that our webmaster Benign0 likened to the movie Crying Game. The American was expecting his new sex partner to be a legitimate female. Of course. But he found out Laude was male (a transsexual or transgender if you will), and got mad. He was deceived. He snapped, lashed out and did wrong himself. But Laude’s deception would make him less free of fault than media would like us to believe.

I don’t expect most gays to be like this; I’m sure many of them disapprove of the above behaviors. But there are likely some who may defend wanting to be recognized as a woman while hiding their being a man. The problem is, it is still deception, and if all you are looking for is sex, you don’t deserve to be protected from the consequences. Hiding one’s real sexuality is not a right.

Such gays are working on the idea that, if I want something, I deserve to get it. Perhaps it can be forced by law. Entitlement operates in this scenario. Perhaps the agenda of these particular gays is, it shouldn’t matter whether you screw a man and woman, right? So everyone should be homosexual! They should be forced to be give sex to whoever wants it! People are entitled to this joy they want from others! But wait a minute, forcing someone to have sex… isn’t that rape?

Human rights is based on the precept that everyone is entitled to self-determination, which includes their sexual orientation. This could be seen as in favor of gays as well as against. But when they want something from others, that other person has the right to refuse them as part of their own self-determination.

The problem cited by opponents of laws in favor of gays is that such laws would grant unequal protection, or special treatment. It could also lead to ridiculous provisions that are not fair. For example, if one does not agree that someone is beautiful, it is considered “bullying,” or someone who doesn’t want to play along with one’s declared transsexual orientation (still referring to one as male even when dressed up and really looking like a female) should be punished.

Also, let’s look at these ridiculous genders some have tried to invent. Nature (which determines reality) only recognizes male and female, and these can’t be naturally changed. Or you have a sex change and want to be called the other gender. What if someone disagrees, and says, “you’re still your original gender.” They have a right to do that. You can’t sue them. They’re not oppressing you. That’s life. It’s not meant to obey you, and other people are not either.

The outcry of many LGBTs is mainly against harassment; that I agree with. But being harassed doesn’t give you the right to harass back. If harassment is a problem, you don’t need a new law or special treatment. Existing laws on harassment can be applied to that.

If some people return, what about heterosexual spurned lovers, the same should be true for them? I agree. There have been many women who made false rape charges against men (the story of Brian Banks who was wrongfully convicted because of a fake rape case comes to mind), many “spurned” who “take revenge” against their spurners. And I’ll repeat that example of our former maid’s brother, who was poisoned by someone who thought he was his rival over a girl. That attitude of “I must have what I want” keeps turning people into monsters.

Again, on that wish of people who believe “I deserve to be loved;” it likely means, they want sex. Sex and love are actually two concepts that have long been differentiated. And perhaps being pampered and being a freeloader can be the actual meaning of the “love” they desire. Sorry, kids, none of that is a right, and you don’t deserve it.

The saying, slightly worded, “I will defend your right to disagree with me,” comes to mind. That seems more appropriate if you replace the latter words with “your right to refuse to give what I want to take from you.” What we need is respect, especially respect of other people’s refusal of you. As well the acceptance that we sometimes don’t deserve to get what we want. That applies to even “love.”
If you’re a transgender, better reveal that you are, and there are people who will accept you for what you are. Deceiving other people means not only do you lack respect for others, but for yourself as well. If you feel you have to lie to get what you want, chances are, you want something that you should not have. If you want find the love of your life, you don’t steal someone else’s love of their life. And if you want something to validate yourself, don’t get it by force, like what a gay couple wanted from the Colorado baker. Get it fairly and honestly, and if refused, move on to the next. If there are other people who don’t accept you for who you are, there’s no point wasting time on them. Keep calm and carry on.

Show post
Stacey McStationary #fundie twitter.com

Flat Earth is a gift.

It separates the sheep from the goats.

Those willing to abandon scientism from those who cling to it. Those who believe God’s word from those who reject it.

Flat Earth is a gift.

Show post
Matthew Heimbach #racist tradyouth.org

Ding Dong Mandela’s Dead

Today at the age of ninety five the butcher of Church Street has breathed his last breath on this Earth. Finally after generations of being the mastermind behind the destruction of the nation of South Africa and the demographic destruction of the Afrikaner people, Nelson Mandela is finally dead. Throughout his many years he has flooded the streets of South Africa with blood, tears with the support of International Communism. Praised by the Left around the world as a “pacifist”, Mandela ordered bombings, beatings, and countless acts of horror to be perpetrated to advance his war against the Whites of Rhodesia and South Africa. There are few greater myths of the modern age than the alleged Sainthood of Nelson Mandela. Mandela was a communist, a murderer, a terrorist, and a thug, and he will not be missed by anyone except for Leftists and fools.

[...]

Mandela was not just a low rent terrorist, he was a commander of an armed campaign to terrorize the Afrikaner people into giving away their country. From wrapping burning tires around the necks of political enemies, including civilians, to using horrendous explosive devices against entirely innocent White men, women, and children, Mandela proved time and time again that he was a violent murderer who truly hated Whites, to the point of pushing for their utter cultural and demographic extinction. With the international Jewish propaganda mill to turn out lie and lie to advance the idea that Mandela was a “peaceful reformer” he was able to continue a decades long terrorist campaign.This was a war of extinction, and Mandela was in it to utterly destroy White culture, society, and people.

[...]

White South Africans gave years of selfless sacrifice to the world. From feeding the starving citizens of West Berlin in the Berlin airlift, battling in the air alongside Rhodesian pilots to stop the communist takeover of South Korea, being the only nation on earth to choose to disarm all of its stockpiles of nuclear weapons, and gave an honest chance to the black majority to help build a republic that respected all human rights they continued to show good faith both domestically and abroad.

Strong Christian values have long been the bedrock of Afrikaner society. The Afrikaners banned abortion while they were in power (only to be repealed by the black majority in 1994), did not allow the sale of pornography, and even closed businesses on the Sabbath Day in accordance with Christian law. Moves against rampant gambling and homosexuality stopped the spread of moral decay within Afrikaner society while initiatives aimed at promoting the family and traditional values helped strengthen the culture and community.

[...]

In South Africa in this age of rampant self inflicted disease (AIDS), murder, rape, and deplorable conditions for infrastructure how could it get any worse? If you are an Afrikaner you not only face the threats of South African society at large, you are facing the very extermination of your people. The Afrikaner language of Afrikaans, culture, and people are being driven to the brink of oblivion, with hardly a dissenting voice coming from the leadership of South Africa. This silence is not due to the government not caring about the plight of Afrikaners, it is due to the fact they are the ones who have orchestrated the systematic slaughter of the white minority.

The terrorist organization the African National Congress which took power in 1994 has been waging a war against the whites of South Africa for decades. Men like Nelson Mandela who are regularly featured as grandfatherly figures by the liberal media are in reality bloodthirsty terrorists. One of the few accurate things from the Clint Eastwoods film Invictus was the line spoken by an Afrikaner following the release of terrorist Nelson Mandela from prison and his ascendancy to the Presidency of South Africa “This is the day our country went to the dogs.” Communists and black supremacists form the bedrock of the new South African government. Former Chinese political prisoner and human rights activist Harry Wu said of the second post apartheid South African President that “Thabo Mbeki, is definitely a communist. Recently, he went to Cuba to meet with Castro, and he was trained in Moscow.”

[...]

Each day grows darker for the honorable Afrikaners of South Africa. After facing genocide by the British Empire, external communist threats, bombings by radicals in their own country, and the betrayal of the world it looks as if the Afrikaner people are facing their demise. At the hands of mobs led by the ANC and murderers like Nelson Mandela who are hell bent on the rape and murder of every white in South Africa, the Afrikaners are at a crossroads. They need the support of the world to resist the extinction of their unique Afrikaner culture and to stop the war that is causing the extinction of the white minority.

Now as the ANC is left to make a choice about the future of the failed multiracial and multicultural nation, they are left with a choice. They can continue Mandela’s policy of destroying the Afrikaner people or perhaps forge a new course, one that respects the fundamental right of self determination for the Afrikaner people and the various African tribes of South Africa. Without assistance soon the land of South Africa will be devoid of Afrikaners and in their place only white crosses will be left as silent tribute to the murder of an entire people while the world silently watched.

I call upon all Afrikaners to use this moment to assemble together and to demand, and take if necessary, a Homeland for your people. White nationalists must heed this as a chance to save the Afrikaner people and culture. As Mandela rots, the White South African culture must rise from the ashes of a failed multicultural State to achieve greatness once again.

Show post
Andrew Anglin #racist dailystormer.com

A member of British National Socialist group National Action, 21-year-old Garron Helm, has been jailed for four weeks for speechcrime against a gross Jewess, Liverpool Labour MP Luciana Berger.

Helm did not call for violence, he did not threaten the Jew bitch. Posting from his Æthelwulf Twitter account, he simply called her a “communist Jewess” and stated the known fact that Hitler was right. He also posted a picture of the Jewess with a yellow star on her forehead.

The UK government is claiming that the people have no right to label a Jew a Jew, and this must be resisted through direct action.

Provocation

Clearly, this represents an attempt by the ZOG government of the UK to shut down National Action, and all criticism of Jews in general.

If we don’t resist, we are doomed.

I hereby ask God Almighty that if any single member of National Action quits the organization over this arrest that his ancestors bring down a curse upon his head, the heads of his children and his children’s children.

We cannot be intimidated by these filthy rats. If we succomb to intimidation now, we are already doomed. This is a life and death battle, and no man who is unwilling to give his freedom or his life or both is worthy of this fight.

The Jewess Berger said the sentence “sent out a clear message.” The clear message being, of course, that you stupid goyim pigs have no right to ever call a Jew a Jew, let alone question their actions.

Well, we’ve got a message for her.

Operation: Filthy Jew Bitch

I declare a new operation against the filthy communist Jewess, which will be known as Operation: Filthy Jew Bitch.

This is the boldest attack on our basic freedoms that I have seen thus far, in any country. The government of the Jewnited Kingdom is attempting to set a precedent where it will be illegal to call a Jew a Jew, and this must be resisted with direct action.

Here’s the deal.

Go to Twitter.com.

Make a Twitter account. If you need a throwaway email to register, use GMX and just enter fake information, get the confirmation code.

Tweet at this communist Jew bitch.

[...]

Do Not:

Call for violence, threaten the Jew bitch in any way. Seriously, don’t do that.

Just to be crystal: Andrew Anglin nor the Daily Stormer support or endorse any form of violence against the sickening Jew Luciana Berger. We believe she should be either legally tried and imprisoned for purposefully undermining the British people and nation, or simply deported to Israel.

Do:

Call her a Jew, call her a Jew communist, call her a terrorist, call her a filthy Jew bitch. Call her a hook-nosed yid and a ratfaced kike. Tell her we do not want her in the UK, we do not want her or any other Jew anywhere in Europe. Tell her to go to Israel and call for her deportation to said Jew state.

Do it over, and over, and over and over again.

Tell her that “#HitlerWasRight,” and then tell her that six million more times.

Flood her with these images (or make some of your own).

[various crude, anti-Semitic images are shown]

Use these hashtags on every Tweet:

#FilthyJewBitch
#FreeGarronHelm

Making a Twitter account takes two minutes. You have no excuse for not doing this, Stormer.
We are all Garron Helm.

We will not bow to Jews. We will not be silenced by Jews. We will not allow Jews to destroy the nations that our ancestors spilled blood to build on this sacred land.

We will resist. And we will win.

Hail Victory.

Show post
CH #sexist heartiste.wordpress.com

#RepealThe19th

This is what runaway credentialism does to our naturally suck-up White women: turns them into Gay Mulatto adoring, poz-pushing, miscegenating White man-haters willing to trash their nation and turn it into a gibs depot for the world’s filth just to get a virtue sniveling tingle in their cooches.

Thankfully, this mental illness is largely confined to over-credentialed White women (I wish this data had been further broken down by marital status). If Trump is to keep winning, he needs a message that appeals to working class women as well as to men. The credentialed battlecunt vote is lost to him; best we can do on Trumperica’s behalf is mock these cat ladies in waiting, shame them for their vapid beliefs, and ridicule their sanctimony. Women do feel the hot burn of shame far more powerfully than do men; a shaming campaign can pay big dividends.

Why do credentialed White broads hate Trump? An MPCer thinks media capture is primarily to blame.

This is the media capture effect. 100% of mainstream political media is anti-Trump, and it hits women hardest.

College educated women listen to NPR and read the NYT. If they’re Republican-leaning they may possibly watch Fox News instead of CNN, but more likely neither. Even the Republican-leaning women still listen to NPR. The Anti-Trump message on all of this media is that supporting Trump is not even something that needs to be rationally considered. Only damaged people like Trump.

This tells on normal women. Plenty of these women would like to support Trump and not vote to sell out their country, but they need social cover for it. There need to be more normal women on TV and the media talking about the bread and butter reasons to support Trump. Jobs, the economy, and protecting what we’ve got from foreign competition are all things to emphasize. Some way, some how, we have to get images of normal women supporting Trump onto the television.

Also, while banging hot women on the side may have helped JFK/Clinton with the average single unmarried Democrat woman, it doesn’t help Trump so much with the average married Republican woman.

Credentialed White Women (CWW) need to be weaned off the Talmudvision. Ripples in their comfortable conformism can eventually effect sea changes in attitude. For instance, ask a CWW at your local airport to remove CNN from the TVs; tell her you don’t want to hear “Fake News”. If she objects, laugh in her face and snort “typical”.

Media capture includes social expectation bias. Some, maybe 5 or 10%, of these CWWs telling survey takers they are voting Democreep are lying to avoid social ostracism from the spinsterhood. I doubt that explains all of the trend, though.

A more potent explanation is that CWWs have come to despise their available White men. These cunts are surrounded on their college campuses by squadrons of soyboys. They resent these un-men and transfer their resentment onto Trump and the shitlord men who support him.

Some of (((their))) resentment is aimed at married White women and popular “Beckys” (a generic term for a psychologically and physically attractive White woman who supports Trump and loves masculine men).

Adding fuel to the CWW rush to anti-Trump and anti-White conformism is the fact that US colleges have become far less discriminatory over the last two decades. Admissions standards have been lowered to accommodate Diversity™ and incoming hordes of White women who want to major in Gender Fluidity and Whorenalism. Colleges are 60+% female, and the sex skew is getting worse, stoking a bitterness in female students who want to nuptially land an educated Chad but find they have to compete with prettier girls just to get a one night stand. Romantic frustration is another culprit pushing CWWs away from sanity and toward Globohomoism.

Which leads to a point I’ve made many times on this blog: when women remain unmarried but economically self-sufficient, they vote for anyone who will strengthen the power of Sugar Daddy Government at the expense of White beta male providers. Government becomes not only a beta provider substitute, but also an outlet for CWWs to vent their spite and signal their loyalty to the gynarcho-tyranny.

The loss of the early-wedded homemaker, in both numbers and status, has created a perverse economic incentive for the CWW who wants cheap consumer products and indentured servants to release her from labor-intensive routine household chores and child-rearing that used to fill a big part of the day of un-credentialed White women, before the DEGREE UP AND LEAN IN, YASS QUEENS ideology took a hold of their imaginations. Throwing more government money at these CWWs isn’t going to solve the problem of them aligning with Globohomo; in the long term it will only intensify their disloyalty to their White men.

The CWW problem isn’t fixed until women have “skin in the game” again. Women have to feel like they are in this together with their men, and that any President and any policies which benefit their men also benefits the women. This means a return to the benevolent patriarchy of America at her height, when sex roles and sex differences were celebrated instead of bitterly cursed like they are today.

Show post
Scott Lively #fundie wnd.com

One of the most serious but least discussed consequences of choosing a homosexual lifestyle is the loss of critical-thinking skills. What is worse, this malady seems to spread fairly easily to non-homosexuals who closely associate with people in the LGBT community (though this observation is by definition unscientific since there exists no objective standard for determining if someone is “gay,” thus a person’s self-declaration is the only measure).

From the inability to distinguish disagreement from “hate” or tolerance from approval, to conflating sex and love, homosexualists (i.e. anyone “gay” or straight who advocates for the mainstreaming of homosexuality) just can’t think straight.

For example, any clear-thinking person can see that basing a right to marry solely on romantic attraction opens the marriage door to many other deviant relationships: polygamy, polyandry, incest, pederasty and even pedophilia. Somehow homosexualists can’t see it.

It is also self-evident that all human beings are heterosexual by design. It is simply unarguable that all sexuality, even the awareness of having a sexual nature, derives from this obvious physiological reality. Yet homosexualists (without a shred of proof after decades of scientific efforts) not only insist that “homosexual orientation” is normal and innate, but that it is impossible for a self-declared “gay” or lesbian to ever reorient to heterosexuality in conformity with the design of his or her body … even when their illogic is being challenged by former homosexuals!

Then there is the narrative implicit in all LGBT rhetoric and policy goals, to wit “all disapproval of homosexuality leads inevitably to hatred, violence and even murder of homosexuals” (which is why, for example, “gay” anti-bulling policies require all schoolchildren to be brainwashed that homosexuality is good and normal instead of simply teaching them to respect others despite their differences). This narrative does not reflect reality. It is a mutually reinforced paranoid delusion, yet it drives the homosexualists with such desperate urgency that every person who dares even to whisper that marriage is for one man and one woman is targeted for personal destruction, from Anita Bryant in the 1970s to Phil Robertson just recently. Few have survived the attacks unscathed.

In fact, so desperate are LGBT activists to prove their false narrative that they regularly commit “hate crimes” against themselves as evidence! Google “gay hoaxes” to see just how common is this bizarre phenomenon. Even the story of their ultimate “hate crime” poster child, Matthew Shepard, was a hoax. An uncharacteristically forthright “gay” journalist spilled the beans last September (after 10 years of intensive propaganda to millions of schoolchildren and passage of a federal “hate crimes” law bearing his name) that Shepard was tortured and murdered by “gay” sex partners in a drug deal gone bad.

In 1973, after an intensive campaign of pressure and harassment by LGBT activists, the board of the American Psychiatric Association voted to remove homosexuality as a mental illness from their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), the “bible” of mental health professionals. It was as if they opened Pandora’s Box and unleashed an invisible plague that attacks the reasoning centers in the brain. Now 40 years later the evidence is overwhelming that the DSM should never have been modified. The only problem is that most of the people with the power to change it back are now homosexualists themselves, infected with the same disorder. God help us.

Show post
usachinanukewar #fundie usachinanukewar.wordpress.com

The biggest bonus I’m gotta have in my eternal life living with Jesus is I’m gotta be the ultimate immortal beauty that makes nations and cities go falling and crumpling, which means all the kings on the earth are going to slaughter with one another at war just because all of them wanna fight for me. Every single one of the kings on the earth desperately wanna go to war just because of my ultimate immortal beauty. Every single of them wanna make me as the queen in each nation, so they go to war to define who’s the winner that can have me as queen, the ultimate immortal beauty that makes nations and cities go falling and crumpling.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
In other words, I’m gotta be the ultimate immortal beauty that triggers World War 3, an all-out global nuclear warfare, because all the world leaders desperately wanna eat me, the ultimate immortal beauty. So, those world leaders go to nuke war for me, because they desperately wanna figure out who’s the luckiest guy that can eat me on the bed and swallow me into his stomach. So, they go to nuke war to figure out who’s the luckiest man. This is the meaning, the ultimate immortal beauty that makes nations and cities go falling and crumpling, because after an all-out global nuclear war the world leaders all die off and die out, their nations and cities falling and crumpling. All doomed.

Show post
CH #fundie heartiste.wordpress.com

May I humbly suggest some other possible causes for the scalzification of American men?

1. Aggro tankgrrls

When the land fills up with aggressively posturing, careerist feminist shrikes on the divorce court warpath, aided and abetted by Cathedral man-haters, the collective response by society’s testes is to ascend behind the sheltering bony plate of the pubis. You could call it the “Junk Tuck and Shuck” theory of increasing faggotry. How this works on a biochemical level is hard to pinpoint, but it makes some intuitive sense that as women gain more cultural power through their own means or a Big Daddy government check, men rationally respond by becoming either smooth talking cads or mewling beta suck-ups. Do women like this state of affairs? Probably not, but as long as men can get the pussy this way, that’s what they’ll give women. The sexual polarity will find its opposing balance, by whatever means necessary.

2. Estrogen in everything

Soy is in everything. So is the effluvium of the Pill. It seems we can’t go a week without some new study touching down with evidence of increased estrogen in our food and water supplies.

3. Lack of a cleansing war/too many men

A culture’s men get soft in the arms of materialist decadence. Never more so than today with so many hindbrain-targeted pleasure stimulators acquired for a relative pittance. Too many men accumulating from a lack of natural (or unnatural) culling means that, thanks to the cosmic directive of female hypergamy, a lot of dispensable, reproductively useless men are piling up. Combine the softness with the uselessness, and it’s a small leap to infer that the male sex would respond, at least at the margins, with a growing acceptance of testosterone-challenged and sexual marketplace-abstaining gayness, broniness, tranniness, and general supine self-flagellating leftoid-ness.

4. Dem friggin fat cows

Maybe male obesity can’t explain much of the trend toward lower T among men, but perhaps FEMALE obesity can explain it. What’s the point of manning up when all your women have womanned down? After all, you don’t have to be much of a man to jerk it to a digital dreamgirl. Fat chicks and porn everywhere have reduced the pressure to find a sexy babe to love, and testosterone levels have responded in kind. What doesn’t get used, atrophies.

Show post
Donald Trump #conspiracy twitter.com

The very rude elevator screamers are paid professionals only looking to make Senators look bad. Don’t fall for it! Also, look at all of the professionally made identical signs. Paid for by Soros and others. These are not signs made in the basement from love! #Troublemakers

Show post
Don Batten #fundie creation.com

Recently, I have had a lot of conversations with atheists. Many express a strong hatred of God. I have been at a loss to explain this. How can you hate someone you don’t believe in? Why the hostility? If God does not exist, shouldn’t atheists just relax and seek a good time before they become plant food? Why should it matter if people believe in God? Nothing matters if atheism is true.

Aldous Huxley (1894–1963), the brother of the atheistic evolutionist Sir Julian Huxley, advocated a drug-fuelled utopia. He gave the reason for his anti-Christian stance:

If God does not exist, shouldn’t atheists just relax and seek a good time before they become plant food? Why should it matter if people believe in God?

“I had motive for not wanting the world to have a meaning … the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation, sexual and political.”1

Like Huxley, some people don’t like God because they don’t like moral constraints—you can make up your own rules, or have none at all, if God does not exist. They hate God and Christians because they are actually not confident that God does not exist and seeing Christians may remind them that they are ‘suppressing the truth’ (Romans 1:18).

What about atheists who had a church/religious upbringing? Some of them hate God because of evil things done to them by teachers in religious schools or by church leaders—people who on the face of it represented God. Antipathy towards God is an understandable reaction, sadly (although illogical).
Some atheists complain of Christian ‘intolerance’ in speaking about hell. But if those who spurn God’s forgiveness will suffer God’s wrath, as the Bible teaches, shouldn’t we Christians be warning everyone about the danger and how they can be saved? How is that ‘intolerant’?

Many complain about hell; they are angry at God because of hell. I understand that teachers in certain church-based schools, and parents in some ‘religious’ homes, commonly used the ‘fear of God’ to make children behave. “You are bad; you will burn in hell if you don’t behave.” But such a simplistic works-oriented approach not only trivializes this most serious of subjects, it negates the Gospel of God’s grace. (We are all ‘bad’ in God’s eyes, and ‘behaving properly’ will not save us—only Jesus can.)

A child who is having difficulties may well conclude that there is no way out for them, leading to years of nightmares about suffering in hell. Such a troubled teenager hearing an atheist say that evolution explains how we got here and that God is a myth2 could find this to be a liberating message, a release from their fears.

The Gospel (good news, see p. 41) is missing from all this. The Bible tells us that God is in the business of salvation. Though His wrath regarding sin is all too real (as seen in the Fall and Flood judgments; pp. 12–14, p. 15), we need not suffer it. Those who come to Him in repentance and faith will not be turned away (John 6:37). See also pp. 32–34.

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16)

It is strange that people hate God, who loves so much.

Some atheists complain of Christian ‘intolerance’ in speaking about hell. But if those who spurn God’s forgiveness will suffer God’s wrath, shouldn’t we Christians be warning everyone about the danger and how they can be saved? How is that ‘intolerant’? It would be extremely unloving not to tell others of this. A gift of Creation magazine might be a good place to start.

Show post
Hesse Kassel #fundie archive.is

5 Lines That Potential Wives Cannot Cross

In the modern west the proportion of marriages that end in divorce is very high, up to 50%. The good news is that it does not follow from this that YOU have a 1 in 2 chance of divorce, no sir. Your chance will at least be reduced, because you are smart and will make the decisions that mitigate some of the risk.
So, you meet a girl who might actually fit the bill. If you’re looking to increase your chances at maintaining a stable family unit, here are five red lines to establish from the moment the relationship starts.

1. You don’t reject me, ever
This first one speaks for itself. Under no circumstance can you accept the idea that she gets to choose if or when to satisfy you or choose to sabotage your joint fertility. Like the other red lines, you need to establish this one well before you sign on the dotted line. Practice this from day one and make it clear before you actually marry and the chance it will be accepted long-term is very high.
If you meet resistance on this matter other than for a very good reason, just quote the line to her. If she continues to protest, then simply next her. Only give sex when it suits you. Making her miss out just a little will only make her keener, so don’t sweat, it establishes the basic theme. You control the time and frequency of sex, not her.
This rule is not just important to the fulfillment of your biological needs. More importantly, a woman who will deny you sex early on will only use it to gain greater power over you in the long run. Simply realize this is not a woman you want tethered to your life, and move on.
The obvious exception to this is the first time you have sex. Typically she will control the timing of that for obvious reasons. From the second time onward, any poorly-reasoned denial is a red flag.

2. I make the decisions, not you
You can’t operate as an effective unit unless there is a clear decision maker. You are that decision maker. As a rule of thumb that means that all decisions about things outside the house are in your sphere. If she wants some responsibility, it’s ok if she chooses how to cook the eggs.
You shall manage money competently and save to create future wealth. After demonstrating that you are a safe pair of hands it will be a lot easier to maintain discipline in this area. If you leave her with power over spending decisions she will squander the lot, so don’t give her the option.
I feel bound to point this out, but it should go without saying. You are not going to make this one stick unless you make decisions which are genuinely aimed at mutual benefit. Once you establish a trust that you will make responsible decisions, most girls will happily follow your leadership. Any girl who doesn’t is just asking for the door. As a gentleman you are ever-ready to open it for her.

3. Contraceptives and abortion are murder
Yes, that’s right. When you are selecting a wife or are married you don’t accept such practices. Why? Immediate children, more children, short gaps between children. These all increase her dependence on you and the loyalty that comes with it.
Sluts and pleasure-seeking women will next you right away if you insist on applying this rule. We are looking for a wife, right? So that’s a good thing. This rule may require some short delay before having sex. That’s fine, we are chasing a good partner for the next 50 years.
If she is marriageable don’t be afraid to make her pregnant before marriage. There is nothing like a baby on the way to increase your bargaining power. Since you are sincere in your search you are not harming her. You are helping her by overcoming her female propensity to waste her fertile years on a career, bad boys, and antidepressants.

4. I don’t touch children till they can walk
Yes, that’s right. Mothering is for mothers. If she tries to insist, just feign incompetence. It’s not hard and no girl can resist taking over.
If she claims she has other responsibilities that just means she doesn’t have enough time for those other responsibilities. Being a mother is a full-time job and her first priority. Any work, sport, church, or whatever that she can’t handle just has to go. Yes, that means everything up until the youngest child enters school.
It’s important for your children that they have her full attention. There is no one on Earth who will do as good a job. Child care services are not acceptable substitutes for a mother’s time, so don’t let her use them. If you are worried about your family living on a single income then either don’t get married, knuckle down, or harden up.
Breast feeding is good for children and increases her bond with your children, so make her do it for one year. Then make her stop. Otherwise it might delay the next child and make her search for alternatives to being a wife and mother.

5. You have left your old family and joined mine
Don’t actually say this one. Just make it clear that her family and friends from before are not important to you. Their opinions do not matter. Don’t spend a lot of time with them. Show them exemplary politeness, but only the required respect and minimum interest.
If she is worth having as a wife then she will get the message and simply attach herself to your family. Under no circumstance should you think that you can establish relations on a win-win basis with such people. They will turn on you the moment there are problems between you and your wife. When that happens, the less influence they have the better.
Now ask yourself how she will find the chance to stray?

Just imagine the situation. Wedding. Pregnant. Child born. Full time mother. No career. Breast feeding. Stop breast-feeding. Constant sex. Pregnant again. Repeat. There is little opportunity for her to get away from the children and her commitment to you, let alone consider alternatives to marriage. By the time the youngest child is in school her SMV relative to yours will have dropped, and you are safer. There are no guarantees in life but this is about as close as it comes to a solid gold one. So, follow these rules and enjoy your traditional marriage.

Show post
Sharpe #racist niggermania.net

The other day, my girlfriend and I, along with another friend of ours, were watching a Hollywood TV movie. It was quite a good film, but at one point, my girlfriend remarked on the disproportionate number of niggers that had been cast.

All three of us are NM’s, though the other two don’t “do” forums, so they’re not members on here. After the film finished, we continued chatting about the unbalanced portrayal of nogs in film and on TV generally.

We came to the following conclusions about casting:

Main hero and/or heroine.
Still likely to be human, as most US and British films are aimed at an English-speaking human audience. The makers want their viewers to be able to identify with the characters. For that reason, there are not many films made in these countries that feature Asian or Oriental leads; not that there would be anything wrong in principle with that. Productions from Asia, China, etc., naturally favour a cast of their own race. Nothing wrong with that either.

Hero/heroine’s best friend or trusty sidekick.
This is where the misrepresentation comes in. The UK population comprises about 8% Asian and only 3% nigger.

In the USA, you have a much lower percentage of Asians, but a large percentage of people of European or Hispanic descent. You also have the native Americans, though these are very much a minority, at 1.6%.

You also have a higher proportion of niggers, at around 14%.

So, statistically, you would expect the best friend character to be either British or possibly Asian, in the case of the UK, or white US, Hispanic or European, in the USA. Yet this character is almost certain to be a nigger.

There are many examples, such as the James Bond films, in which Bond’s CIA ally, Felix Leiter changed colour at some point from white to black (he was definitely white in the books) and “The Hitchiker’s Guide to the Galaxy,” in which the hero, Arthur Dent’s friend, Ford Prefect, is a nigger. Again, he was a white Englishman in the book and original TV series.

The trusted authority figure; this could be a cop, lawyer, doctor etc.
Nigger.

Subsidiary characters, who have a minor role in the plot.
Between about 25 and 50% nigger, though in the film that we watched, it was quite noticeably higher. This figure is out of all proportion to the percentage of nigs in both US and UK society.

The villain.
Human. Always. Under no circumstances whatsoever, will a nigger be portrayed in a negative way. If the action takes place in a corporate boardroom, you can expect the 25 - 50% nigger population that I described above… unless the board is that of an evil corporation bent on environmental destruction, suppression of human rights, etc., in which case, there will not be a nigger in sight.

Clearly, the reason for this massive misrepresentation is to maintain a PC agenda, and try to install a general acceptance of the nigger as being just another type of human. Future historians will probably wonder why we, in the 21st century, went to so much trouble to do so. As do I.

Show post
Ben Garrison #fundie grrrgraphics.com

image

President Trump accomplished a lot during his first year. He almost immediately ended the Trans Pacific Partnership, which was a bad deal for American workers, because their jobs were being sent overseas. He refused to go along with the Paris ‘climate change’ accord, which punished America in particular. Climate change is science purchased by globalists, who want to use fear to gain further control of our economy. Trump broke their spell. He’s for America first.

Under Trump, we now have a conservative justice added to the Supreme Court, with more appointees to come. Unemployment has been lowered along with illegal immigration—unvetted or otherwise. Trump is the only president who has had the nerve to actually transfer the US Embassy to Jerusalem.

Taxes have been lowered and the Obamacare mandate has been repealed. In fact, many of Obama’s so-called ‘accomplishments’ have been negated, which is no doubt very irksome to the former president and chief narcissist.

Previous presidents preferred to kick the can down the road when it came to North Korea, but Trump has signaled that he’s had enough. The little round tyrant in North Korea thought he can threaten us with nuclear annihilation and launch missiles over Japan without consequence. After all, previous presidents were always played for saps. They gave the hermit nation concessions every time the dear leaders rattled their sabers. Bill Clinton, with the help of Jimmy Carter, gave the Stalinist country nuclear reactors and billions of dollars in aid. The dictator hugging Carter received the Nobel Peace Prize for his effort, while the North Koreans went ahead with their nuclear weapons program without skipping a beat.

Regulations have been pared back and business are bringing jobs back to America. Work has been done to thwart Islamic terrorists. Obama’s Muslim prayer rugs have been removed.

Naturally, to those possessed with ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome,’ all of his accomplishments are the acme of evil. This is to be expected. The left’s precious socialism and political correctness are finally getting the pushback they’ve long deserved, thanks to President Trump.

There remains much work to be done. Our infrastructure needs rebuilding. The wall needs to be built. The Deep State Swamp needs a lot more draining. Hillary still needs to be locked up. President Trump remains the best man for the job.

Show post
Awaiting #racist realjewnews.com

The mentality of the Jews is one of barbarism and base human instincts. It is as primitive as fallen man himself, and as self perpetuating.

The desire or belief in the ‘messianic’ right to rule the world is the most basic expression of this primeval delusion, and is the very antithesis of ‘civilisation’, personal and social development, and planetary progress. If these maniacal, primitives really want enlightenment, then they should best look at the progress of the world and their place in it in terms of joining the human race, rather than destroying it. You receive what you give. if this is good, thats what you get back. if this is evil, this is what you get back.

These Zionists cannot come to grips with the basic fundamental laws of life. This is because they have never really understood them. This goes back to their rejection of their own Torah and the Prophets to begin with, followed by the rejection of the source of all Truth and all Life, Christ, who is God himself. So they really have gotten off on the wrong foot right from the beginning.

They lag behind in moral development; they lag behind in spiritual development; by 2000 years at least, even further.

Having trashed the Palestinians out of their land and washed them out, in a flood of blood and tears, not out of any real power of their own, but with Gentile enablement, which maintains them even today, they presume to see themselves as rulers when they are nothing but parasites and have always been nothing but parasites.

Their wealth is not of their creation but ours. They see no other way, and this lie even to themselves, the most dangerous of all, by which they live only has a limited shelf life. Only the truth is worth having and will survive when all else is dross. This is because they have always denied the truth when it was given to them, to the point now where they cannot grasp it even if they wanted to. They are slaves of their own self perpetuating destiny, and this is the crushing part, that destiny is hell itself.

If they want real life. If they want real power, they should study the lives of the Christian saints, who were able to do great things, great miracles, as part of their normal everyday life. And this power, this great life giving power came not from magic, the occult, which is soul destroying and a negative black antithesis of the power of life. This real power they possessed came directly from God with whom they were in constant communion, in a constant state of grace, a constant state of joy, and all this simply by abandoning themselves to God and carrying the cross of the constant mortification of their fallen human nature, and thus to the development of the real potential of their god given soul.

If you are a Jew and you do not subscribe to the destructive philosophy described above you are still the chosen of God. The apple of his eye, remembering that since the birth, death and resurrection of the Son of God. Christ, there is no more need for a chosen race. Its purpose is redundant and you are chosen by virtue of faith. This you share with all who follow or seek after truth.

Soon Christ will return in the great Second coming, but beforehand He will prove tot he whole world He is God. Be prepared for this revelation so you may choose the right path, whether or not you now believe.

Show post
Mitch Berg #conspiracy shotinthedark.info

Last year, Google’s collective (heh) culture of Urban Progressive Privilege-sotted virtue-signaling intolerance fell onto Google engineer James Damore for the high crime of out that Google, ironically, has a relentlessly PC, virtue-signaling-focused corporate culture. Damore was summarily fired.

This past week, Damore and his team filed their lawsuit

Damore has now answered Google with a legal broadside, and it’s extraordinary. Most people don’t have time to read his entire 181-page complaint, but those who do will find a comprehensive argument that Google’s corporate culture encourages, sanctions, and facilitates an extraordinary amount of abuse against conservative white males.

Artists Conception of a Google staff meeting:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WupvCZhKMnM

And he has the receipts. Much of the complaint consists of screen shots of internal Google communications and postings on internal Google message boards that would constitute strong evidence of hostile-environment race-and-gender harassment if the the races and genders were reversed. For example, “Googlers” (that’s what employees call themselves, using Google’s silly corporate language) relentlessly enforce a so-called “Googley” culture where employees blacklist conservatives (blocking them from in-house communications), actually boo white-male hires, and openly discuss committing acts of violence against political opponents. The “punch a Nazi” debate is alive and well at Google, and the definition of “Nazi” is extraordinarily broad. In one posting, an employee proposes a “moratorium on hiring white cis heterosexual abled men who aren’t abuse survivors.” In another, an employee advertises a workshop on “healing from toxic whiteness.” Another post mocks “white fragility.” The examples go on and on, for page after page. Damore also alleges (and again, provides screenshots of emails and other communications to support his claims) that managers actively attacked conservative employees, encouraged punitive actions against dissenters, and even awarded “peer bonuses” for speech attacking conservatives.

Google is a private business? Sure – they’ve got every right to run things any way they want. But we’ve seen what mindless monocultures have brought to most of our major cities; what do you think it’ll do to a company?

Googlers may have special coding skills or may fit seamlessly in the company’s Googley culture, but it’s now plain that much of their discourse represents a special kind of pettiness, stupidity, and intolerance. It’s often fact-free, insulting, and narrow-minded. In other words, a Silicon Valley monoculture produces exactly the kind of discourse produced by monocultures everywhere. While there are certainly kind, courteous, and civil progressives at Google, the existence of the monoculture also enables the worst sorts of behavior.

Read the whole thing.

Show post
Rob #conspiracy kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

The main purpose of the military and of foreign wars these days is probably to soak up money. If the US was left with any surplus wealth (i.e. anything other than a $17 trillion debt), there’s a danger that some of it might get diverted to border control. The devil finds work for idle cash.

Show post
BlackFeather #fundie thelastcrusade.org

Islam sucks!. It is not a religion. It is a political ideology bent on terror. A muslim cannot be an American. They owe their soles to islam only. There are no American muslims. They stink, literally. Worked with a couple of the useless bastards when they weren’t off praying sticking their asses in the air 5 times a day as a message of submission so Mohammad can pork them in the ass! Yea, that’s why they do it if you didn’t know!

Show post
David Chase Taylor #conspiracy sites.google.com

Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
The Ku Klux Klan, commonly referred to as the KKK, was purportedly founded on December 24, 1865, by six Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tennessee during the Reconstruction Era post American Civil War. The secret society was first known as the "Kuklux Clan", a name derived from the combination of the Greek words “kyklos” (??????), meaning “clan” and “kuklos” (??????), meaning “circle”, inferring a circle or a band of brothers. Aside from term “Knights”, which has historically been used by orders affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church, the logo of the KKK bears a Roman Cross superimposed with an icon representative of the number “6” which equates to the letter "F" or the " ?" (i.e., the double-cross) in the Roman Score (i.e., the Roman alphabet). As witnessed by the numerous KKK members who were tried and convicted decades after their respective hate crimes, the double-cross is always in play. In other words, members of the KKK are routinely sacrificed once they have fulfilled their respective missions. Fifty years after its inception, the KKK re-established itself in Atlanta, Georgia in 1915 atop Stone Mountain. Founder William J. Simmons and other were members of the Knights of Mary Phagan, a secret society likely affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church. Consequently, the organization and its chapters adopted regalia featured in “The Birth of a Nation” (1915), including white costumes, robes, masks and conical hats which are coincidentally also Greco-Roman in origin. The KKK also began to use paraphernalia adorned with a white Roman Cross on a red shield. At its peak, Klan membership reportedly exceeded 4 million and was comprised of 20% of the adult white male population. However, as of 2012, the KKK was estimated to have between 5,000 and 8,000 members and 150 Klan chapters. It is classified as a hate group by the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Aside from the Southern Cross of New Orleans, Knights, orders and secret societies affiliated with the KKK include but are not limited to: the Bayou Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan; the Imperial Klans of America, Knights of Mary Phagan, the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the White Camelia, the True Ku Klux Klan. the United Klans of America (UKA), the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, and the Women of the Ku Klux Klan.


KKK Under CIA Control
Similar to most secret societies (e.g., Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, etc.), the KKK claims that it is not one organization but rather that it is composed of small independent chapters. They also claim that they never operated under a centralized structure, despite the existence of the United Klans of America (UKA), one of the largest Ku Klux Klan organizations in the U.S. which admittedly had “tens of thousands” of members. Nevertheless, modern historical sources emphatically state that “there was little organizational structure above the local level”. Klan organizers entitled "Kleagles" reportedly traveled the country, signing up hundreds of new members who paid initiation fees, receiving KKK costumes in return. Historical sources state that “The organizer kept half the money and sent the rest to state or national officials”, further confirming a top down command structure within the KKK. Whether the Fraternal Order of the Eagles is connected to the Kleagles and the KKK is not known, but they both appeared in America around the same general time. The first national leader and Grand Wizard of the KKK, Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, boasted that the Klan was a nationwide organization of 550,000 men and that he could muster 40,000 Klansmen within 5 day notice. Needless to say, this would not be possible if there was no centralized structure within the Klan. Although the KKK claims to be an "invisible" group with no membership rosters, no chapters, and no local officers, in 1925 a Klansman was bribed for the secret membership list and subsequently exposed Klansmen running in the state primaries. Modern historical accounts even state that the so-called “second Klan was a formal fraternal organization, with a national and state structure”, rendering the aforementioned claims of independence obsolete. During the Civil Rights Movement in the American South, the KKK forged alliances with the police department in the South (e.g., Birmingham, Alabama) and with Southern governors (e.g., George Wallace of Alabama). The fact that they conspired with the state to commit acts of terror across the South confirms that the KKK was in fact a state-sponsored terrorist organization. According to historian Brian R. Farmer, "two-thirds of the national Klan lecturers were Protestant ministers”, a statistic which suggests that there was a federal program to incite hate across the South. It has also been revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has paid informants within the Klan who were active in Birmingham in the early 1960s. In 1964, the FBI's COINTELPRO program admittedly infiltrated and disrupted civil rights groups from within while the KKK attacked them publically. In other words, the FBI and the KKK worked in unison to destroy the Civil Rights Movement which was bringing black and white people together, a threat to the establishment and the status quo. The notion that the KKK is intimately affiliated with the FBI was further confirmed when Bill Wilkinson of the Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, was revealed to have been working for the FBI. Due to the KKK’s uncanny ability to avoid prosecution for their hate crimes and their intimate relationship with the U.S. government, namely the FBI, it can be ascertained that the organization is highly organized and under command and control of the CIA of Switzerland.

KKK & Prohibition
The KKK’s allegiance to the U.S. government was never more apparent than during prohibition which decimated rural America’s self-sustainability and caused widespread economic damage the country. Historian Prendergast stated that the KKK’s "support for prohibition represented the single most important bond between Klansmen throughout the nation”. This confirms, albeit in a de facto manner, that the KKK was on the payroll of the U.S. government. In 1922, two hundred Klan members set fire to saloons in Union County, Arkansas, terrorizing the South. Their use of violence against bars, bootleggers and distilleries was widespread, working hand in hand with the U.S. government against the people of America.

KKK Legislation
In response to KKK-related violence, the U.S. federal government passed the Force Acts in 1870 and 1871 which were allegedly used to prosecute Klan crimes. However, in 1876, the Supreme Court of the United States eviscerated the Ku Klux Act in “United States v. Cruikshank” (1875) when they ruled that the federal government could no longer prosecute individuals although states would be forced to comply with federal civil rights provisions. The result was that African Americans were at the mercy of hostile state governments that refused to intervene against their own private paramilitary groups. In other words, there would be no federal prosecution of the Klan and therefore they could continue terrorizing the South as they pleased. Six years later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in “United States v. Harris” (1882) that the Klan Act was partially unconstitutional. They stated that Congress's power under the Fourteenth Amendment did not extend to the right to regulate against private conspiracies. Again, the U.S. federal government openly allowed the Klan to operative with impunity, repealing all federal laws that could be used to prosecute them. Therefore, it must be concluded that the KKK was a federally funded program that they did not want to interrupt.

Terror Arm of Democratic Party
Evidence acquired to date indicates that the KKK was primarily used as the terror arm of the Democratic Party. According to historian Eric Foner: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party…Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to…destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life”. According to historical sources, “The members of the first Klan in the South were exclusively Democrats”, launching a "reign of terror against Republican leaders both black and white. Those political leaders assassinated during the campaign included Arkansas Congressman James M. Hinds, three members of the South Carolina legislature, and several men who served in constitutional conventions”. The Klan also attacked black members of the Loyal Leagues and intimidated southern Republicans and Freedmen's Bureau workers. They killed black political leaders, heads of families, and leaders of churches and community groups because they had prominent leadership roles in society. In North and South Carolina alone, within an 18-month period from ending in June of 1867, there were 197 murders and 548 cases of aggravated assault”. To add insult to injury, the KKK made people vote Democratic and gave them certificates of the fact. Again, the KKK was working hand in hand with a state-sponsored political party, further confirming that they themselves were in fact state-sponsored.

KKK Cover
Although a federal grand jury determined that the Klan was a "terrorist organization” in 1870, its member remained free to terrorize the South for over a century. Reason being, the KKK was a cover for federal intelligence operation being executed in the South. If a politician or labor party leader needed to be assassinated, their subsequent murder would be blamed on the Klan. In other words, the KKK was the scapegoat for thousands of acts of state-sponsored terrorism. The notion that the KKK was nothing more than federal cover was corroborated by historical sources which state in-part: “Many people not formally inducted into the Klan had used the Klan's costume for anonymity, to hide their identities when carrying out acts of violence…While people used the Klan as a mask for nonpolitical crimes, state and local governments seldom acted against them.” The fact that the government did not prosecute said crime further confirms that the KKK was a state-sponsored organization. This notion was also substantiated by a Georgia-based reporter who wrote in 1870: "A true statement of the case is not that the Ku Klux are an organized band of licensed criminals, but that men who commit crimes call themselves Ku Klux.” Historical sources also state that: “The "Ku Klux Klan" name was used by a numerous independent local groups opposing the Civil Rights Movement and desegregation, especially in the 1950s and 1960s.”

“The Birth of a Nation”
Just prior to the Ku Klux Klan re-establishing itself atop Stone Mountain in Georgia, a film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released nationwide on February 8, 1915. In short, the film served as the advertisement for the new and improved KKK. The film was allegedly based on Thomas Dixon, Jr.’s book “The Leopard's Spots” (1902), as well as his book and play entitled “The Clansman” (1905). Dixon stated that his purpose was "to revolutionize northern sentiment by a presentation of history that would transform every man in my audience into a good Democrat!" In other words, his work was designed to reignite racial and political tension between the North and South along the lines of the previously fought American Civil War. In “The Clansman”, Dixon falsely claimed that the KKK had used burning crosses when rallying to fight against Reconstruction. Nevertheless, film director D. W. Griffith repeatedly portrayed an upright Roman Cross on fire in “The Birth of a Nation” rather than the St. Andrew's cross which was historically accurate. Due to the movie, a burning Roman Cross has been associated with the Klan ever since. Consequently, William J. Simmons displayed an upright burning Roman Cross atop Stone Mountain during the KKK’s second founding. Because “The Birth of a Nation” (see movie) was a Hollywood propaganda film that mythologized and glorified the Ku Klux Klan, it made the terrorist organization a household name overnight. The film is credited with single-handedly reviving the KKK in America. By portraying the Ku Klux Klan a heroic force, the film created an artificially induced Klan craze, exactly as it was designed to do. Needless to say, the movie has been used as a recruiting tool by the KKK ever since. At the official premiere in Atlanta, Georgia, members of the Klan rode up and down the street on horses in front of the theater, a publicity stunt designed to invoke fear in the South. As depicted in the movie poster for “The Birth of a Nation”, much of the modern Klan's iconography, including the standardized white costume, the white cross on a red shield, and the burning cross, were all derived from the film. Under Democratic U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, the “The Birth of a Nation” was the first motion picture to be screened at the White House. In order to create even more racial tension and turmoil in America, Wilson, a Southerner, endorsed the film. According to a Hollywood press agent, Wilson stated after watching the film, "It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true”. Naturally, Wilson's alleged remarks generated a national scandal, causing Wilson’s staff issued an official denial on April 30, 1915. According to a press release from Wilson's aide, Joseph Tumulty, "The President was entirely unaware of the nature of the play before it was presented and at no time has expressed his approbation of it”. Due to its phenomenal success in causing unprecedented racial division in America, the “The Birth of a Nation” is often ranked as one of the greatest American films of all time.

Anti-Catholic Agenda
In order to publically disassociate itself from the Roman Catholic Church, it’s alleged founder and funder, the Ku Klux Klan has disseminated various forms of anti-Catholic propaganda, especially since its second founding in 1915. Shortly after the pro-KKK Hollywood propaganda film entitled “The Birth of a Nation” (1915) was released in America, the KKK suddenly focused on the impending threat of teh Catholic Church, resorting to anti-Catholicism and nativism. Although a book entitled “Klansmen: Guardians of Liberty” (1926) was allegedly responsible for fostering the Anti-Catholic sediment, it’s far more likely that the Catholic Church wanted to distance itself from the KKK after funding the aforementioned film which generated an uncontrollable and unpredictable KKK movement. In a cartoon from 1926, the Ku Klux Klan is depicted chasing the Roman Catholic Church (personified by St. Patrick) from the shores of America. The "snakes" in the cartoon are labeled with the negative attributes of the Church, including superstition, union of church and state, control of public schools, and intolerance. In another carton from 1926 entitled "The End", a KKK member is depicted with an American flag and a Bible sitting atop a fat Roman Catholic priest. Historian Roger K. Newman stated that KKK politician Hugo Black "disliked the Catholic Church as an institution" and gave over 100 anti-Catholic speeches at KKK meetings in Alabama during his 1926 U.S. senate campaign. Black was subsequently rewarded for anti-Catholic rhetoric when he was elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate later that year. Although Black said he left the Klan when he became a senator, it is highly unlikely. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Black to the U.S. Supreme Court despite his activity in the Klan.

KKK Bombings
During the Civil Rights Movement and the days of Martin Luther King, Jr., there were so many Klan bombings in Birmingham, Alabama, that the city's nickname was "Bombingham". During the tenure of Bull Connor, the police commissioner of Birmingham, Alabama, Klan groups were closely allied with the police and operated with impunity, showing once again that the KKK was and is a state-sponsored terrorist organization. In states such as Alabama and Mississippi, Klan members also forged alliances with the governors' administrations. When the Freedom Riders arrived in Birmingham, Connor gave Klan members 15 minutes to attack the riders before sending in the police to quell the attack. In Birmingham and elsewhere, the KKK bombed the houses of civil rights activists, also using physical violence, intimidation and executing assassinations. According to a report from the Southern Regional Council in Atlanta, the homes of 40 black Southern families were bombed between 1951 and 1952. The Ku Kulx Klan was responsible for numerous murders during the Civil Rights Movement, including but not limited to: the 1951 Christmas Eve bombing of the home of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) activists Harry and Harriette Moore in Mims, Florida, resulting in their deaths; the 1957 murder of Willie Edwards, Jr. Klansmen forced Edwards to jump to his death from a bridge into the Alabama River; the 1963 assassination of NAACP organizer Medgar Evers in Mississippi; the 1963 bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, which killed four African-American girls; the 1964 murders of three civil rights workers, Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner, in Mississippi; the 1964 murder of two black teenagers, Henry Hezekiah Dee and Charles Eddie Moore in Mississippi; the 1965 murder of Viola Liuzzo was transporting Civil Rights Marchers in Alabama; and the 1966 firebombing death of NAACP leader Vernon Dahmer Sr., 58, in Mississippi.

Knights of the White Camelia
The Knights of the White Camelia was purportedly founded on May 22, 1867 in Franklin, Louisiana by Colonel Alcibiades DeBlanc, a Confederate veteran. The name was derived from a snow-white flower of the genus Camellia, an apparent reference to the required skin color of its members. The secret society supported white supremacy, opposed to the Republican Party, and was very similar to the Ku Klux Klan with whom it associated with. Unlike the Klan however, which drew much of its membership from lower-class southerners and Confederate veterans, members of the Knights of White Camelia were mainly upper crust southerners, including doctors, landowners, newspaper editors, and officers. By 1870, the original Knights of the White Camelia allegedly ceased to exist. Like so many other secret societies, their alleged demise has likely been exaggerated. In other words, the Order appears to have gone undercover. Louisiana Judge Taylor Beattie, who led the Thibodaux massacre of 1887, and David Theophilus Stafford, the Louisiana adjutant general, were both member so the Order. In 1939, TIME magazine quoted West Virginian George E. Deatherage as saying that he was the "national commander of the Knights of the White Camellia", suggesting that the Order is alive and well. Based on their use of the Roman Cross and their close relationship with the Ku Klux Klan, it can be ascertained that the Order was founded and sanctioned by the Roman Catholic Church.