MobilePenor #sexist fstdt.com

we don't have a sexual market that could be considered free. I've already posted it in the past but it got ghostbanned because probably it had some trigger keyword:

laws regarding divorce are in favor of women, they don't have any incentive in mantaining a decent family
the State provides for women and single mothers via welfare, no need for men
women's status is inflated by affirmative action programs, women only scholarships. It's much easier for a woman to get a great job and keep it, so the dating pool is greatly reduced
anti-family propaganda comes from sources subsidized by the State (ex. academia)
many other small laws in different countries (ex. no paternity test in France)

Things were bad, but what made it worse was the "globalization" of sexual markets. With social media like tinder or instagram, many males had to compete not only with the local circles but with the whole city if not the whole world. Globalization is good when it comes to work because you can change your job and get cheaper goods, but you can't change your desire to be loved. This may be only free market influence on the whole rise in inceldom, but even then it may be argued that social media were made possible by the federal reserve printing money (quantitative easing). I personally don't think it would've been possible to have facebook, tinder, etc so widespread if it wasn't for the fed keeping interest rates extremely low and basically pouring money into SV via venture capitalists.

In any case, moral of the story is that we're not in a sexual market that can be considered free, because it is clearly steered by the State even if probably unwillingly for the most part. I don't think an uniinfluenced sexual market would be good for the males as a market controlled to favor the males, of course, but it would be fair nonetheless. In the end what's happening is that men, including incels, are financing whoredom with their taxes.

ps. even the market economy is not free, in the west it got much less free in the last years and that's why people are moving into big cities. There used to be much less regulations and tax avoidance was much easier before. In big cities you are closer to bureaucrats and legal institutions, which are those who plan the economy and make regulations that impede the free market, and therefore the best way to survive for a business is to be close to them physically in order to have an influence

3 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.