[On if a one world government is good]
No. Government sized in its current state is too large. For example, the divide between the trump supporters and the trump haters- what I mean is the trump haters want this to essentially be the "United States of California and New York" rather than "the United States of America"
What I mean is the bulk of their liberal populations are typically in those two states that have insanely large populations, and they refute the election because the law states popular vote doesn't matter at all with regards to the election, whereas the electoral college is everything and makes sense since it already accounts for population densities, it simply gives people in rural areas a larger voice than if it was strictly popular vote.
21 comments
" what I mean is the trump haters want this to essentially be the "United States of California and New York" rather than "the United States of America" "
And yet the Obama haters wanted to secede.
"the election, whereas the electoral college is everything and makes sense since it already accounts for population densities"
It helped Obama get elected and your ilk were furious about it. It is important but has shown itself to be far less democratic than it is purported to be.
Not sure. He's full of hate, and biased, but he's stating (almost) true things nonetheless : One political family has his electorate in the most populated areas, and is stripped of its electoral power by biased electoral rules.
It will never happen. As Catholics and Protestants can't agree, and Sunni and Shia can't agree, we will never get the whole world to agree on anything much. It was hard enough to make most agree that a clean environment could be nice to have in the future, too.
What about the Obama haters? The Drumpf despisers are the ones who want it to be the "United States of America". Drumpf wants it to be "Trump States Inc.".
The voting districts are drawn so that Republicans ought to have a better chance at winning.
So, you don't want one person-one vote, but one city person-half a vote / one rural person-two votes?
You should see how they carve up some states to ensure Republican wins by carving up liberal areas and spreading the segments into outlying Republican voters. The states look like a wild root system or a hundred meandering creek lines instead of your average county blocking. It has no other purpose but to nullify liberal votes. Shit like that should have been outlawed years ago, several recent attempts to continue this Gerrymandering practices have been stopped with state judges FINALLY citing it as voter suppression but the clock needs to be wound back on these redraws of the last few decades.
So why should you get a larger voice? Why should six people in New York count less than three people, twelve acres, and a cow in Nebraska? Last I heard it was supposed to be "government of the people", not "government of the square mile".
If you could make it work then it would be great. The end of the everpresent threat of war between nuclear powers and the ready access to global resources, alone, would catapult human development forward by leaps and bounds. Gotta figure out standing before you can learn to walk, though, and we're still trying to figure out how to pull ourselves up with the coffee table.
image
Problem, o haters? I'm just taking your logic to it's ultimate conclusion.
Unless you're prepared to admit that the 'Great Experiment' has failed: and Donald Fart is the final proof of that, then I'm afraid that you only have the right to STFU and enjoy your Dumbfuckistan.
All four years of it.
" rural Republicans "
Is that a euphemism for
Backwoods Bubbas,
Mountain Williams,
Inbred Rednecks,
Billy Bob and his cousin-wife?
Just checking, I want to be PC, too.
@Philip McAcademia
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know that stupid peoples votes didn't matter. Any ways, yes, hillary did not appeal to a lot of middle to lower class workers, mostly white, but with some minorities( although most of the country is white so do with that what you will) and thats why Trump won. And explain to me how Clinton was supposed to convince a guy in small town america who lost his job under Obama that she would bring his job back by doing more of the same.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.