@ #1984093
This is a humor website, privately owned and operated. It can therefore define "fundie," which isn't in the dictionary, in any way it pleases. If you're happy to accept that, you're welcome to come and have fun; if not, then you don't have to stay. One thing is certain, it's not the same thing as "fundamentalist"; fundamentalist Christians are only some of the people quoted on this website.
I can't speak for the people that run this site, but where does it say that FSTDT has to be neutral? The very fact that it makes fun of people who fit the definition of "fundie," whether they are Christian, Muslim, Jewish, atheist, conservative, socialist, white supremacist, black supremacist, alt-right, SJW, vegan, anti-vaxxer (and I've seen them all on FSTDT) would lead one to the view that FSTDT is not neutral about those who value unreason over reason.
@ Dr Razark & Shephard Solus
I've been posting here for four years now, and in that time I've had a lot of my submissions posted; there are three of mine up today, including this one. So I feel I have some idea of what's fundie and what's not. But it isn't true to say that left-wing fundies are as easy to submit as right-wing ones. Over the years I've seen a fair few quotes that were hardly fundie or weren't fundie at all but, as sometimes happens, the submitter doesn't understand the context in which the OP is saying those words. I have also learned that a number of posters pour scorn on OPs saying that no true Christian would kill people or we've never been free because their pet ideas haven't been adopted while at the same time claiming that nobody has ever been killed in the name of atheism and we've never had true socialist government.
I don't submit quotes as much as I used to; I don't have the time to go looking any more. But I do submit when I come across something that fits the bill. As it happens, that means that I've submitted rather more quotes from the left than the right recently. I've found there are a couple of things to bear in mind: 1) it's often true that quotes on the left are long-winded and, with many, you don't realize how truly awful they are unless you know the issue under discussion and something about the history of the left or at least of the group to which the OP belongs. Conservative quotes are usually pithier and therefore funnier; since the rise of left-wing populists like Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn, however, this is no longer the case: those on the left are just as capable of a moronic tweet or closed-minded article comment as those on the right. 2) quotes from the left are held to a higher standard than quotes from the right; I've learned that over the years that I can post a conservative quote that is stupid or ironic, but with a quote from the left, it has to be absolutely batshit insane or it won't get posted. Perhaps that's because Distind or his successors don't like them, or many posters will agree with the OP, I don't know; it's not my website and I respect those who run it. 3) I have a very much lower success rate in getting quote from the left posted as posts from the right. Again, I don't know why that is; it may be that the originating website deletes the comments, it may be the OP themselves deleting their tweet, it may be FSTDT is fed up with my submissions. Like I said, I don't run this place, so I'm happy to abide by their decision, though it would be nice to know why FSTDT doesn't use some rather than others.
