www.kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

The Administration #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Managing the manifold vagaries of large nation-states is a task reserved for the supple mind. One who eschews that which may seem intuitive to the masses, though never appears in a progessive’s lecture hall.

Here is a case in point. Stable or moderate growth organic societies centered around nuclear families and cohesive, high social capital communities may be demonstrably effective in practice, but never work in theory.

What does work in theory, is to encourage pliant young women to forego motherhood in favor of tilling the barren soil of cube farms. And when anti-natalist policies bear the predictable no-fruit, then pivot into demanding millions of sullen nepotistic and highly fecund foreigners come to replace the native children now aborted and contraceived away. Then upon their arrival, reorder the once safe, prosperous, and homogenous society to accommodate the aliens’ myriad grievances. And further, propagandize the founding stock into spasms of apologia for insufficiently prompt groveling. Finally, as the demographic tide becomes a tsunami, and the founders dispossession a fait accompli you primly chortle: Well, you wouldn’t have babies anyway. Besides large white families are irresponsible and probably racist. Goodday.

In hindsight we can all agree that this is how leaders of reason and fidelity would approach the subject. But, to my astonishment, at least one Neanderthal in Eastern Europe hasn’t bought into the model. He offers a far simpler solution.Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

" Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Monday lashed out against immigration, setting one of the main policy objectives of his next term in power after winning parliamentary elections in April.

“The goal is to cease immigration whatsoever,” said Hungary’s prime minister. “I think the current liberal immigration policy, which is considered obvious and morally based, is hypocrite,” Mr. Orban said.

At a meeting with Hungary’s ambassadors to foreign countries on Monday, Mr. Orban recited part of his speech in Ypres, France at the European Union prime ministers’ summit and commemoration of the World War One centenary.

There he said he wanted to include in the leaders’ joint statement that immigration is wrong, and Europe’s aim is to cease immigration.

“There were two types of reactions: some envied me because they mustn’t say things like that although they’d very much like to. The others disagreed because they’ve failed to turn around demographic trends with family politics; have kept social tension at bay by subsidizing the jobless; and aren’t fazed if the ethnic basis of a nation state is broken,” Mr. Orban said.

The Hungarian prime minister said it was of paramount importance for Hungary to remain a nation state speaking the same language and having Christianity as its religious cornerstone. Instead of financing the current immigration policy, Mr. Orban said member countries should boost development in the immigrants’ home countries, focus on increasing the birth rate in their home countries and carry out back-to-work programs for Europe’s Romani population of more than 10 million.

In 2012, net migration in the United Kingdom and Italy both stood at 900,000; in France it was 650,000, in Spain 600,000, in Germany 550,000, World Bank data show. This compares to Hungary’s 75,000 in 2012.

Hungary’s officials have been focusing on increasing the birth rate in part by boosting subsidies, offering tax exemption for those who have three kids and also re-introducing a three-year home stay for new mothers after giving birth.

Another way the government means to boost newlyweds’ mood to make babies was the social ministry’s congratulation card, which couples received after state weddings. The card included quotes from Hungarian poets and the ministry promoting childbirth as a way to keep up the Hungarian nation.

“If your love for one another becomes the source of a new life, that’s the greatest gift to your family. A child is a blessing, and the pledge of survival of the family and our nation.”

What? Cease immigration? Maintain the core characteristics of the country? Boosting native birthrates? Survival of the family and nation? My God, how much hate can one man contain? I’m certain someone has an answer to that. Though honestly, I’m little inclined to entertain it at the moment.

Hearing a western leader actually taking the side of his own people is somewhat akin to hearing Eric Holder reciting Shakespeare at a renaissance fair. Something to acknowledge with wonder. As we’ll acknowledge the simplest solution to ordering a sustainable society: Orban’s Razor.

Uprising #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Whites still behave as a race as if they are tending/ animals. You accept bad behavior from your puppy (at least initially). You accept your pet goat might eat the laundry (or random items) if it gets out from its enclosure. It is a subconscious supremacy over your pets. Whites have this subconscious supremacy over all other races/tribes. It is of course born of winning the war over other races/tribes in the past and stays with us today especially amongst women. The most liberal whites amongst us (again generally women) will tend to coddle the animals they take care of (think female dog owners with uncontrollable dogs) while the more conservative whites amongst us (generally men) will discipline and teach their pets to behave in a correct manner or face consequences. Whites exist along a bell curve from liberal to conservative in terms of political belief and it is of course entirely reasonable to assume genetics, hormones and brain neurochemistry are fractionally responsible in deciding where on the bell curve you sit (along with life experiences). At some point though the dog becomes too much for the single lady and has to be dealt with (biting the hand that feeds it).

The question then is two-fold. 1. When do liberals feel threatened enough that their perception of the other races changes. They are not “pets” anymore to care for. They have become dangerous and threatening and the enemy !! A shock to liberals of course. Not to anyone else.

2. When white men respond, will we have the ability to respond as needed? Will our capability and resolve still be there? In western countries when many of our women are fat carousel riding sluts, you wonder if things are worth saving except for your own skin.

I think the white race will survive. I certainly hope so. The white race has given the world science and technology and mozart. Africa?

In the end any true conflict will be won by technological prowess.

White men already see the enemy for what it is. You can live side by side with the enemy as long as you dominate it. Women on the whole are clueless. It is genetic. Women are frankly wombs. They will fulfill their destiny by mating whether it be with a white male or the new race that takes over the neighbourhood.

Giving women the vote in the west was a mistake. Each “family” should get one vote. And a family is a family headed by a male, not a single mommy. A productive unit. A unit that is a net payer of tax. You do not get to be a “decider” if you are not a producer.

The Anti-Gnostic #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

*On the US Senate Elections*

So far, Georgia’s 58% native-born statehouse just scrawls in “Republican” five minutes after the polls close and that’s that. I don’t know for how much longer. I can only pray we at least get enough upper-tier mestizos who really do pay comp premiums and taxes.

I swear the phenotypes are getting so exotic around here I’m expecting to see bones thru people’s noses.

The Administration #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

The Economics of Ebola

We’ve previously discussed The Smallest Immigrants. Though another worthy addition to our “rich tapestry” of undocumented pathogens has arrived. There is now a confirmed case of Ebola in Dallas, with the upside of the infected having contact with several children who have all been attending their local indoctrination mill. Hopefully this won’t lead to an encroachment of communicable diseases into the normal classroom curriculum of white malfeasance. At long last, has this virus no sense of decency?

Though this is exactly the type of occurrence that could proliferate into a clarifying event. Ebola could have easily been prevented from arriving to these shores. Simply block all traffic and personnel from the infected areas. That’s all. Doctors who wished to conspicuously display their virtue could either attend to the sick domestically pro bono or indulge themselves in Africa with the foreknowledge that this was a one-way ticket until the epidemic was extinguished. But of course, that would both inconvenience the peacocks and violate our fundamentalist modern pieties. It would be unfortunate if thousands of Americans expired via eyesocket exsanguination, though if diversity were impacted, well, that would be an even greater tragedy. But to a great many, watching a loved one excruciatingly perish to a disease that was wholly preventable will focus the mind. Hopefully on the two-legged rodents that imported it.

Our society’s maladaptive behavior has resulted from two primary components: numbers and price. White liberals, and those who do the thinking for them, smashed the social compact by importing foreign proxies to overwhelm their own people. Almost like a family argument decided by one side inviting in 14 strangers to settle the debate. A victory as brief as it is sweet. As for price, most have avoided the direct costs of vibrancy. And those who do are not always able to contemplate the indirect costs, like strained services, higher taxes, and stagnated wages.

Ebola infections, in contrast, represent quite direct costs. And will possibly even lead to calculations in minds previously able only to fathom “Second down and six to go.” Calculations such as racial antipathies are growing and becoming multifaceted; taxes and prices keep increasing; high-paying jobs are scarce and many going to foreigners; universities are astronomical and openly discriminate against my children; air travel has become insufferable; the police state is armed like the First Infantry division; the federal government has become openly hostile; ever-growing swaths of formerly beautiful cities are now third world criminal enterprise zones. And now fatal exotic diseases have come to stalk our country.

Random Commenter #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

I’m Italian, and I’m quite active and vocal in my opposition to mass immigration. What I noticed is that more and more people are openly anti mass immigration— even on the net, people have absolutely no fear of openly attacking this sort of policy and very little fear of being considered racists. I can take a walk and hear people complain about this absurdity. I’d bet good money that reasonable people are the majority. This changes absolutely nothing, those in power are completely uncaring of what people think, they just accuse opponents of being “scared of change”* and proceed right on. At least after months of ferocious indignation we managed to get Kyenge (the gary coleman lookalike congolese Minister) out of the Government, we’ll see what the future holds. The feeling is that more and more people are getting seriously pissed off. And I live in Northern Italy, southerners are genetically predisposed to violent and virulent racism and feel very little need to conform to politically correct thoughts (though they use the immigrants as slaves and they get beaten by the various mafias if they cause problems)

Agapoula #fundie kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

“A people without children would face a hopeless future; a country without trees is almost as helpless.”
Theodore Roosevelt.

Not wanting children is something I struggle to understand, especially for a woman. I understand some women can not, God have mercy. But surely the urge must be there, and feminism burys it deep.

What is the objective of life for woman if not to have children? I am 23 years old and when I think how I do not have children yet it makes me feel very sad. But I am ok because I have many neices and nephews and two more due to be born next month. :D . I hope I make my own soon, because I am way behind. My oldest sister made her first at age 16. Which is quite young, but she was married so it is okay.

This is one thing I am confused about, I do not understand how feminism alone is capable to make a large number of women not want to be mothers. Feminism is just a ideology. Wanting children is a biological urge. We play with dolls from when we are old enough to walk and pretend they are our babies. We make ourselfs look pretty so to attract a husband, to make babies. I think it is deeper than feminism, it has to be hormonal imbalances or something else wrong. Christianity tells us some things can not be done before marriage (for good reason), that does not mean human beings who adhere to Christianity LOSE the urge, they just control it. How can a simple ideology like feminism take that natural urge from a woman? That is why I think it is more than feminism. There are a few possibilities of what it could be, maybe, birth control. Birth control effectively tricks a woman’s body in thinking it is pregnant so no ovulation, thus taking the broody feeling away.
A woman with healthy hormones, no birth control, is usually broody by age 19, in my opinion. Before, even some women who did not have babies or could not, usually become nuns/nurses, so they were still utilizing their need to care and nurture.

Agapoula #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Ahh crazy.

In Cyprus there is also a immigrant problem, not ALL of them are problems. But one thing that makes my blood boil hot, is when immigrants say how generally, they do not like Greeks or Cypriots. How we are a “opressive, fascist, sexist” people.

If you decided you say, out loud, in a normal company of people, that “generally”, you do not like immigrants, people will say are you a racist?

At market recently I was talking to some foreigner women who were complaining that our men are all perverts because they press the horn on the cars when these women pass them at market.(women dressed in mini skirts—.at market.) and so then generalize about ALL of our men, saying they are sexist.

If they do not like our Mediterranean men – get out of our countries. It is quite simple, I have no intentions of moving to Pakistan, because I do not like their way of life and have no right to dictate to it. Yet foreigners think they have a right to steal our European way of life from us and express loudly that they do not like us, while feeding themselfes from the money OUR people in taxes.

The Administration #conspiracy kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

I suppose Barrack Obama always was the man for his time. A half-black lawyer leading a half-white America into half-African politics. I still recall so many witless conservatives apoplectic about a potential Hillary! presidency. Certainly one imagines that would have rivaled the awfulness of its Bush predecessor. Though few seemed to fathom how the alternative–an oddly-named exotic–might chafe at the gossamer strands of executive restraint. And chafe he has, almost to the extent of unburdening himself of limitations entirely.

In watching this presidential molting, one comes to realize that the contours of power in Washington are shaped as they are everywhere. Not by words on disintegrating parchment, but by will or by force. Obama’s authority expands in the absence of opposing will to temper it. The will of living men. In its failure blossoms the Law of Rule. A man’s power is not established by documents, but by the concession of those he would dominate. If one commands and others obey, then any relationship formalities are just that.

So it was interesting to watch as the head of just one of three co-equal branches of the federal government summarily cast a polyglot country of 300 million into yet another military conflict thousands of miles from our own pustuled border. In doing so Obama answered the question that must be clarified by all those seeking highest office: How would your administration bomb Iraq?

And who is charged with making declarations of war as Obama did on ISIS? Congress, of course. And, contra Bush, Obama no longer even feels compelled to seek its input. It is simply ego expanding into a vacuum. A process so egregious in this case that even devout leftist toadies have begun to croak. Sounds that will only lull Obama in his bed chambers by their impotence. Because complaining is hardly preventing. And that prevention must begin as the tip of the camel’s nose starts angling into your tent.

Let’s review some other “Betrayals of the Constitution” that New York Times writers were sanguine in regarding—

Obamacare
Any willing to invest in the research could meticulously catalogue the series of constitutional encroachments surrounding this legal abortion. Though I’m inclined rather to state only the obvious: once a law is passed in congress and signed by the president, neither party without explicit prior authorization may simply amend it ad-hoc as per their convenience. The number of waivers, extensions, delays, and modifications–all issued by extra-legal fiat–have been fairly remarkable. I honestly wonder why congress didn’t simply pass a one-word bill stating in totality: “Healthcare.” With Obama dictating particulars from that premise alone.

Federal Drug Laws
It’s irrelevant where one stands on the issue of various legalizations. There are duly enacted federal drug statutes outstanding that Obama/Holder have simply nullified. Was there the popular will to revoke these? If so, there was a process to do so. And though I am staunchly in favor of states rights and devolution of power, this is an example of neither. It was instead states being allowed to do only what Obama was inclined to allow. If any believe otherwise, let us watch the reaction if a state were to pass laws nullifying “civil rights” enforcement.

Dream Act
Ahhh, to sleep perchance to dream. We’ve discussed previously Efforts to turn America from a nation into a market. Though in the past, The State at least bound itself to process. A tedium Obama dispensed with through his 2012 non-deportation order through something called “Homeland Security.” Again I wonder at how liberals would respond to a defense of “prosecutorial discretion” as interpreted by a testicled opposition.

Welfare Work Requirement
The 1996 Clinton-signed welfare reform package was generally considered very effective. One of its key provisions was a work requirement. It was quite a draconian concept at the time: you must do something vaguely productive in exchange for receiving wealth stripped from your neighbors. The left, of course, howled. Though subsequent to its enactment welfare rolls dropped significantly. In 2012, the HHS exercised the “waiver authority” it did not possess and simply nullified that provision of the law.

Undoubtedly other examples exist. Though should he ever abdicate, the Obama presidency will have been very instructive for the perhaps 17 conservatives with sufficient faculties to take the lesson. Institutions and offices serve men, not abstractions nor words on paper. Those who win societal conflicts understand this. Those who lose do not.

So I have some indelicate advice for conservatives from victorious liberals: F the constitution. As we have seen, it’s a quite easy lay.


calculus #conspiracy kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Beside the political hype from Al Gore, there was still some value in the Global Warming story: it implied ‘decroissance’, it implies ‘Sustainability, think globally, act locally’ as in: ‘keep your manufacturing jobs close, keep food production close, limit transportations as much as possible, don’t over-product, don’t waste, there is no point to manufacture your socks in china and consume 100 gallons of fuel to move them here, if you can make them at home’, and so on.

The idea of ‘decroissance’ and ‘sustainability’ was in the air in the 80-90s to back up the idea. I heard the concept in France. Of course ‘decroissance’ had to be also applied to the population: the population growth should never exceed the local ressources in energy and impact the well being of its inhabitant. France had always been less crowded than Germany for example. For a long time it was 40 millions versus 60-70 in Germany. Now its 70 millions in France, thanks largely to massive immigration. And therefore, Massive Immigration also does not make sense in a sustainable system.
By the way, for the first time in its history, this year, France had to IMPORT wheat . The experts appointed by the system will tell you it’s because of a drought, blablabla, It’s totally irrelevant in my opinion and it’s just an excuse. Think it couldn’t happen in America’s food production system? the central plains are too big? think again.

Now, nobody talks about Global warming anymore, perhaps because it implied all these concepts that went countercurrent to the wishes of the Elite, first of which was a massive import of population that was not needed. America will reach 350, 400 millions? Africa 2 billions ? and millions of what, under-educated, under-employed (at best) low class citizenry, overpopulated, with imported tropical diseases adapting to northerners latitude thanks to—..yes, global warming.
Global warming: yes, it may be smaller than the predicted models. But, it may also be difficult to measure because in a dynamic system like the Earth Ecosystem, you can’t expect LINEAR EFFECTS. Everything is buffered against abrupt changes. What you can expect is a series of hick ups that are clues that the system is entering into an instability regime. And then a massive change, without warning, when all buffered systems have been exhausted and collapse.

A quote from our past:
“—Though the climate gradually improved after the ice sheets reached their maximum extent around 20,000 years ago, the ice warrior made one more attack. The big freeze came with devastating speed. The first warning was a period in which the climate oscillated from warm to cold. Then in a single year, 12,679 years ago, northern Europe went from a temperate climate to glacial conditions. Once more Europeans were threatened with extinction, but managed to survive, though in some cases by ceasing to be Europeans—.”

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v1/n8/abs/ngeo263.html

IA #fundie kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Quiet, you are not oppressed. By any sane standard (by that I mean thousands of years of human history) you are very fortunate to be alive right now.

You are aware, I hope, that homosexuality was considered a sin. Then, not so long ago, a mental disorder. Now, its warmly embraced (is that the right choice of words?) by the most powerful man in the world, with legal protection, and even preferment. So, when we hear that man/boy love is a mental illness today one can’t help but ponder the future. And, as you know, blacks, being obsessively jealous of THEIR fake-victim status will have to up the stakes to reparations. Then, feminists, not wanting to feel left behind, will demand more Muslims imported (preferably black ones), simultaneously carpet bomb them elsewhere, while sexist, racist, bigoted white men are beheaded or abandoned on rooftops fighting for their lives.

But, that’s really not the point. Its not just the sex or race stuff. In a way, that’s beside the point. Eventually, government as a sort of pusher and citizens as client junkies will, by necessity, end. At some point somebody somewhere is going to have to pay. And there will be much gnashing of teeth and wailing in the land.

calculus #homophobia #conspiracy #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Homosexuality is partly caused by a self-reinforcing mental process, especially considering the brain plasticity during teenage, which, associated with autosuggestion, becomes an irreversibly imprinted into early adulthood.
You’ve heard of people getting trapped into religious sects and sort of addicted to it, right? They never get out by themselves. Same thing here.

So, if you are at the beginning of your sexuality and you get trapped in a homosexual pattern, you may never get out of it. And yes, by the time you reach legal age, you will feel genuinely attracted to boys. But this attraction will be the result of an induced or imposed behavior, not a genetic determination of any sort.
In the past, a boy may have feel confused with his hormones and vaguely attracted to boys for a short time, but that was it. No Induced process was there to imprint his brain because of the barriers put in place by the Society, plus Religion forbade it, so, end of story. Now, here is an incredible concept: the Society was actually protecting its Citizen, can you believe it?

That’s one thing. The other thing is the chemical environment. It contains pollutants and hormones analogues, that decrease men’s hormonal load, which translates into hetero men with lower sperm count and in boys into small breast and small penises. A note here: fat is great to store all these pollutants, in addition to racial differences in sensitivity and fat storage. See how everything is linked?
Then, obviously, many more boys will start at the edges of hormonal un-differentiation and will become easy preys to the psychological mechanisms mentioned above.

Don’t say it’s not true, because even in girls you have the mirror mechanism: the constant decrease in the age in the fist menarche of girls. In the 18th century, It was relatively convenient for a girl to remain chaste until her 17eens, when she barely finished her puberty at 16, as opposed to now when many white girls start puberty in their 10th or 11th and are done by 12, and we ask them ‘not to think about it’ for the next 6-7 years, with raging hormones inside.
I asked a doctor why is that (for the girls) he said he doesn’t know, and nobody knows for sure. A combination of many chemicals, food, and behavior is likely.

So this is it. Beside the rare cases of true hormonal imbalance genetically determined and very rare, as for most genetic diseases, most cases of homosexuality are ‘induced’ by environment and behavior.
For the environment: pesticides/growth hormones are used to increase food production as well as many other chemicals from plastics, and female hormones are also directly released in the environment.
For the Behavior: well, the body is merchandised and you own your body right? so there is a market aperture here.
To resume it all: it’s MONEY.

So if you want, you can replace my long text with that small emoticon of a slightly hunchback man with a crook nose and who is rubbing his hands because of all the money he knows he’s gonna make.

The Administration #conspiracy kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

I’m sure many of you have exhaled in relief upon learning that Stunning satellite images show summer ice cap is thicker and covers 1.7million square kilometers MORE than 2 years ago—despite Al Gore’s prediction it would be ICE-FREE by now. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2738653/Stunning-satellite-images-summer-ice-cap-thicker-covers-1-7million-square-kilometres-MORE-2-years-ago-despite-Al-Gore-s-prediction-ICE-FREE-now.html)

"The speech by former US Vice-President Al Gore was apocalyptic. ‘The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff,’ he said. ‘It could be completely gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.’

Those comments came in 2007 as Mr Gore accepted the Nobel Peace Prize for his campaigning on climate change. But seven years after his warning, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that, far from vanishing, the Arctic ice cap has expanded for the second year in succession – with a surge, depending on how you measure it, of between 43 and 63 per cent since 2012.

To put it another way, an area the size of Alaska, America’s biggest state, was open water two years ago, but is again now covered by ice.

Judith Curry, professor of earth and atmospheric sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, said last night: ‘The Arctic sea ice spiral of death seems to have reversed.’
Those who just a few years ago were warning of ice-free summers by 2014 included US Secretary of State John Kerry, who made the same bogus prediction in 2009, while Mr Gore has repeated it numerous times – notably in a speech to world leaders at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009, in an effort to persuade them to agree a new emissions treaty.

Professor Andrew Shepherd, of Leeds University, an expert in climate satellite monitoring, said yesterday: ‘It is clear from the measurements we have collected that the Arctic sea ice has experienced a significant recovery in thickness over the past year."

image

I recall when the Global Climate/Warming Change hysteria was in full crest. Weather supremacists strode the lecterns ascendant. Denial of heat became as taboo as denial of race—or even worse! The Earth was growing so molten so quickly that by next Wednesday one would be able to use Hillary’s desiccated womb as an open air microwave. It was all very much settled.

And of course the left’s hoi polloi plunged it down their gullets bones, gristle, and beak. Given some period with a pliant media these people could probably be manipulated into grease painting their faces to sing “I’m a little teapot” in robotic pantomime nude on a weekday sidewalk–while screaming at those who aren’t.

Though Al Gore had this played well. It required only some discreet model tweaking here and thermometer breakage there and the red hot world would be copacetic. Though ironically enough, the weather just wouldn’t cooperate. Cool summers, cold winters, and growing ice. Growing. Always growing. Always mocking. Its smirk no less searing for the frigidity.

No doubt I now grew very pale;—but I talked more fluently, and with a heightened voice. Yet the cold increased—and what could I do? It was a low, dull temperature—much as a winter bough enveloped in snow. I gasped for breath—and yet the media heard it not. I talked more quickly—more vehemently; but the ice steadily increased. I arose and argued about trifles, in a high key and with violent gesticulations; but the ice only grew. Why would these acolytes and minions not be gone? I paced the floor to and fro with heavy strides, as if excited to fury by the observations of the men—but the ice steadily increased. Oh God! what could I do? I foamed—I raved—I swore! I swung the chair upon which I had been sitting, and grated it upon the boards, but the ice arose over all the arctic and continually increased. It grew thicker—denser—whiter! And still the reporters chatted pleasantly, and smiled. Was it possible they saw not? Almighty God!—no, no! They saw!—they suspected!—they knew!—they were making a mockery of my horror!-this I thought, and this I think. But anything was better than this agony! Anything was more tolerable than this derision! I could bear those hypocritical smiles no longer! I felt that I must scream or die! and now—again!—hark! Colder! Slicker! Crunchier! Polar bears!
“Villains!” I shrieked, “dissemble no more! I admit the deed!—tear up my tome! here, here!—It is the freezing of this hideous Earth!”

You know, if Al and the kids were actually convinced of cataclysm, one would imagine news of cooler temperatures and growing ice–a pleasant failure of dire forecasts–would be greeted with a singular sentiment: relief. That it is not may lend some insight into otherwise veiled designs.

Yet the now almost comical failure to bring any predictive power to the debate must have surely sent advocates scurrying back into their own skins for some retro-fitted circumspection. At least that is what the model of human behavior might suggest. But it too would be wildly inaccurate. For science is hardly cowed by mere humiliation. Now is when faithful men in white coats stand to be counted. Now is when guns sound at the front. To reputational ruin or Ragnarok!(http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26122-no-more-pause-warming-will-be-nonstop-from-now-on.html?cmpid=RSS%7CNSNS%7C2012-GLOBAL%7Conline-news#.VAU-fGK9KK3)

"No more pause: Warming will be non-stop from now on

Enjoy the pause in global warming while it lasts, because it’s probably the last one we will get this century. Once temperatures start rising again, it looks like they will keep going up without a break for the rest of the century, unless we cut our greenhouse gas emissions.

The slowdown in global warming since 1997 seems to be driven by unusually powerful winds over the Pacific Ocean, which are burying heat in the water. But even if that happens again, or a volcanic eruption spews cooling particles into the air, we are unlikely to see a similar hiatus, according to two independent studies.

According to another recent study, the current hiatus may be our last for a while. Matthew England and his colleagues at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, tried to quantify the chance of another pause. “It’s looking to us that it’s probably going to be the last one that we’ll see in the foreseeable future,” says England.

Using 31 climate models, they showed that if emissions keep rising, the chance of a hiatus – a 10-year period with no significant warming – drops to virtually zero after 2030. The current hiatus will probably be followed by rapid warming as the heat trapped in the ocean escapes back into the atmosphere, so we are unlikely to get another decade of no warming before 2030. England believes it could be another century or more before the next hiatus.

But that could change if we slow greenhouse gas emissions now. If we can reach peak global emissions by 2040, the temperature rise will slow by the end of the century, and hiatus periods will become more likely.

Hiatuses can also be triggered by volcanic eruptions that spew particles into the air, reflecting sunlight away from Earth, as happened after the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption. But even if a volcano erupts it will make little difference. “After 2030, the rate of global warming is likely to be so fast that even large volcanic eruptions on the scale of Krakatoa are unlikely to drive a hiatus decade,” says team member Nicola Maher.

To the Chromosphere and beyond! So here’s my question: what did the models say about hiatuses in the late 90s? And if the answer is nothing, then what has improved of our climate understanding in the interim to now confidently dress them as natty scapegoats like little Lords Fauntleroy? What a darling hiatus this just happens to be. It’s from those Pacific winds, you know. They just started about 17 years ago and haven’t abated yet. What, you want climate models that take wind into account? Get real.

It may very well be that Warming Change is as both real and dire as claimed. Though the whole present firmament has tainted themselves with histrionics, false predictions, and calumny to skeptics. I’m of little inclination to hear the same bleats from the same mouths. Let them dissolve into less damaging pursuits and be succeeded by a more sober and judicious generation of climatologists who are emotionally capable of offering an honest accounting. If their models offer some predictive value, then informed citizens will be properly advised from there. Though by that time I’ll be dead–and not from a .7 temperature increase either.

IA #fundie kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

I thought at the time AIDS would destroy the gay rights movement. But it energized them. They began Act Up as a means to simultaneously deepen their victim status while escalating demands on bigots and haters. I remember going to an art gallery in the early 90s where I first found out we guys were supposed to wear women’s shoes. I thought how dull and demurred but to my surprise my friend actually put a pair on! But I see it is now spreading down and out to the masses. Status-marking Eloi really like this sfuff.

The Administration #homophobia kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

We are all drawn to acts of bravery. Whether it is of an iconoclast standing on the periphery of the herd or a party forsaking personal security for noble sacrifice. In those rare moments of courage in others we find aspiration for ourselves. Could I have done the same? Would I have? We like to imagine the answer being affirmative.

And so would you like a perfect modern profile in courage? An example of a man’s stoic fortitude and selfless sacrifice for others?

That exemplar would, naturally, manifest in the form of an adult homosexual surreptitiously recording his emotionally-wrought parents asking him to leave their house and then broadcasting the recording for global consumption. That, my friends, is courage. That is selflessness. That is quiet virtue in the face of adversity. That is obnoxious solipsism in parlaying private family strife into fashionable homo celebrity. The sublime parody of an article is here. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2737624/Your-courage-inspiring-Man-kicked-parents-came-gay-able-start-new-life-website-raises-50-000-help-him.html)

*Author links this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGL4BmkstLg titled "Heartbreaking moment parents disown their gay son+

I do have to offer some acknowledgement to the extraordinarily homosexual Mr. Daniel Ashley Pierce. By consciously publicizing a very painful and very private family rupture, and thus turning the parents that suffered to raise him into international objects of the liberal rending machine, he has successfully increased my already elevated ambient contempt to something quite invigorating in its intensity.

Though, of course, opinions vary on properly assigned disdain. Readers of the Daily Mail logically allocate to the parents, who believed they were having a private conversation with a son they believed could be trusted with such; and thus were not play acting to elicit sympathy from an audience. As of course this courageous homosexual was doing precisely. Here’s a sample of reader comments:

Hang in there buddy. God loves you more than those judgmental hippocrates (sic-lol)

This is such horrible failure as parents, and so far away from the gospel of Jesus

Omg!!! I cried— Poor baby. His parents claim 2 b religious yet they were cursing

I feel bad for him! From my religious studies, I believe God taught us to love everyone!!!

Those parents should be ashamed of themselves. They’re ugly small minded people. I hope he can heal from the hurt they’ve caused.

Daniel, I’m so glad you got away from this hateful situation. I hope you have a great new life. Keep smiling!

Feel really sorry for this lad, having parents from the Dickensian era – You are, sorry to say better off without them. They are entrenched in their “backward” ways.

This is what actual brave men in Antietam, the Somme, and the Ardennes fought to provide? One wishes to hear their present opinions from the beyond. How many would have instead sided with their adversaries?

It is also interesting to wonder of the inevitable conflict between the black and rainbow flags. Which color do you think will run?

Phalluster #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Mexicans” can be a fascinating in-group when we distance ourselves from the perspective of squat little mountain gnomes scurrying over our White border to do the job/wage ratio we turn our noses up at. American soccer (sans quotations for the purpose of this post) used to be an exercise in Whiteness as recently as 1994, when the USA hosted the World Cup. The USA squad had 20+ Whites, a token black (Cobi Jones) for “speed”, and perhaps some latent hispanic who passed the paper bag test. That’s the timbre of the team that inspired me to play that game for many years. Recently though, the German coach with a pan-Asian wife brought a roster of 10 Whites, 10 stain-skins, and one lone Amerind to the international tournament. The USA performed exactly to their expectations: finished 2.5 in the group stage and lost a close knockout round opener. This seems to be the ceiling for Team USA for the foreseeable future, as it was twenty years ago.

Team Mexico is just a bit different. I post on the fun forum ‘Caste Football’ every so often, and a modest flame war broke out between the Americans and the EU rebels who claimed they would cheer for Mexico over USA for fielding a “more White” squad. Without posting our own racial admixture results from 23andMe, it was an honest sentiment from a continent filled with negro interlopers. But there is no pressure for Team Mexico to naturalize West African candidates, and in fact the actual ‘mestizo’ percentage trends toward the fair-complexioned conquistadore descendants rather than the pagan midgets whose wives all spread for Big White Cock one way or another (i bet they came hard too).

Mexico sends us their tired, their sick, their hungry and homeless— and cheers to them for passing off the degeneracy demographic onto the idiot fat cat with the open bar tab. If I could be a fly on one wall, I’d pick a high-ranking foreign office and listen to what those meritocrats actually say about our blanket policy of insanity. I truly believe the chinks in China are stroking off over our suicide, but I wonder how heartily the ‘mestizo’ Whites at the top of the Central American governments guffaw over their fat bellies at this punchline.

Rob #conspiracy kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

The main purpose of the military and of foreign wars these days is probably to soak up money. If the US was left with any surplus wealth (i.e. anything other than a $17 trillion debt), there’s a danger that some of it might get diverted to border control. The devil finds work for idle cash.

The Administration #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

I’d like to begin with a brief Q and A. See if you can discern nationalities, or at least geographically derived human sub-groups, from the following series of photos.

image


image

image


image


image


image

So what would you guess? Does the diversity of the people in each photo aid in the speculation? Here are the answers.

1) Chinese
2) Indians
3) Congolese
4) Nicaraguans
5-6)—Swedes

Do we notice any incongruencies in these national compositions? The lingering suspicion that perhaps diversity hasn’t quite been globally embraced? The thought that it never will be? That the entire concept of diversity will evaporate as mist with the last white majority? That diversity was never anything but a ruse to induce very foolish people into doing very harmful things? Is there almost, if one were to assign malicious intent, the sense that only one of the nations in those photos is being systematically scrubbed from the planet? Well no, thinking that is hate. Doing that, on the other hand, is most certainly not hate.

And that doing in Sweden is what this article will remark upon. For a couple of days ago in that country of fleetingly ethereal beauty, a small political group peacefully assembled, as citizens in heretofore Western countries are prone to do. According to the Daily Mail, this was a group of “Neo-nazis,” a term deployed in the article no less than four-times in a sort of journalistic call-response sing-along. What are they? Nazis. What are they?? Nazis!! In a nod to fairness and symmetry the party’s actual name–The Swedes Party–was also mentioned four times. Here is the Triple-R platform of the Swedes Party:

1. Sweden should in the future be Swedish: Only people who belong to the western genetic and cultural heritage, where ethnic Swedes are included, should be Swedish citizens.
2. Sweden shall be governed by the Swedes: Non-Swedes shall not be allowed to hold positions of power in Swedish society.
3. Sweden shall be governed for the Swedes: All policy decisions should be based on what is best for the interests of ethnic Swedes.
4. Sweden shall be governed as effectively as possible: The state apparatus shall be headed by a modern system of government that benefits the Swedes as efficiently as possible. The form of the government must be based on competence and responsibility, and its mission must always be to serve the people, not vice versa. The government’s motto should be improvement, development and what’s best for all of the people.
5. Sweden shall have actual self-government: Collaborations with other countries shall be gladly carried out, but no agreement stating that a supranational government will be accepted.
6. Sweden shall be a safe country to live in: Security, both individual and economic, should be one of the society’s foundations.
7. Freedom of expression: All questions shall be allowed to be discussed in Sweden, research shall be free, and restriction of privacy by governmental surveillance of non-criminal citizens shall not be allowed.
8. Swedish resources shall be owned by the Swedish people: Major Swedish natural resources and public utilities should be owned by the Swedish people meaning that all profits from such business returns to the population and not to foreign or private interests.
9. Community cohesion and social justice should permeate society: Class fragmentation should be replaced by class community whereby all of the peoples’ creative and productive efforts are highly valued and no social group is allowed to advance at the expense of any other.
10. Sweden shall have strong environmental and animal welfare goals: Sweden has unique nature that is worth protecting and preserving. Food industry and other industries dealing with livestock must be ethically sound and sustainable.

In other words, The State exists to serve The Nation rather than Nation serving State. And though it’s not difficult to see why this stance would lead liberal bots into motherboard meltdowns, it does lead one to wonder—why else? Why else would groups of like people ever form and empower a state apparatus, if not but to serve their interests? Swedes originally created a state and drew boundaries for the benefit of Swedes. No one else. There are approximately 8 million Swedes in a world of 7+ billion. If they do not stand as their own advocates, none will.

I will wager that not a founder of a single western state did so with the intention that his creation would find its purpose in dispossessing his posterity. That the media takes pains to reassure its cud-chewing consumers that this fundamental premise of government is Nazi! should explain all one needs to learn about the veracity of its reporting.

So what occurred when a few dozen Sweden for the Swedes congregated? Well, the gibbering howler monkeys went ape-shit, naturally. Furiously demanding that their children’s birthright be bequeathed instead to Sweden’s proliferating Somalis, they formed ranks in the thousands to attack the few remaining vessels of their forefather’s Viking legacy.

And then it became amusing. Because mounted police at the scene also drew fire from the left’s marionettes. And after issuing several ignored orders to disperse, they attended to the crowd the old-fashioned way: they rode them down in the street.

According to a witness: ’It is a narrow street where they rode ten horses abreast in full gallop towards a group of about 300 to 400 people. Police kept repeating this.

To provide a visual flavor—

*pic omitted. Graphic charge of Swedish mounted policemen on demonstrators. Authors adds a LOTR pic for irony*


Alas, the pleasant images cease there. In the end it was only a few dozen against thousands. And no force on Earth will deny a peoples determined to perish. Further, the rate of that dissolution is accelerating. The treasonous Swedish government, or I suppose one could say the government loyal to the people’s self-abnegation, has announced even more saints are arriving to camp.

In October, Sweden’s Migration Board (Migrationsverket) is expected to raise the prognosis of refugees in Sweden to 100,000, reported the Sydsvenskan newspaper on Tuesday.

The total would mark an all-time record for Sweden.

A spokesperson from the board explained that the dramatic increase Sweden has seen of late could be put explained by the unrest around the world.

This year’s income so far has arrived mostly from Syria, Somalia, Libya, and Eritrea.

Another reason for the hike in numbers is the worsening situation in northern Iraq.

“Our conclusion is that refugees from there still can’t get to Sweden, but will be able to by late autumn” Zettergren concluded.

A poll published on Monday showed that nearly two thirds of Swedes thought Sweden should take in more refugees or at least the same number as it currently does.

The poll, carried out by Novus, found that 32 percent of respondents believed the intake should be decreased, and 36 percent said the amount should remain the same. About 26 percent said Sweden should take in even more refugees, and six percent responded that they didn’t know.

The poll also showed that women and younger Swedes were slightly more positive towards refugees than men and older Swedes.

On Saturday, Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt said Swedes should tolerance in the face of increasing refugee numbers.

“I know that this will cause friction. I therefore call on the Swedish people to show patience and open their hearts” he said.

Last year, Sweden took in almost 20 percent of the EU’s asylum seekers, more than any other country in the union.

Despite Sweden’s relatively small population of 9.5 million people, which is 1.9 percent of the European Union’s total population, Sweden opened the doors to a total of 135,700 asylum seekers – 46 percent of whom came from Syria.

In September last year, Sweden granted permanent residence to all Syrian refugees, the first country in the EU to do so.

The prime minister will be pleased to imagine the Swedish people will probably be opening their hearts as well as their necks before this matter is settled. And though it is excruciating to watch them do away with themselves for the mere frisson of liberal preening, one can hope their ashes will fertilize the resistance in other countries. For if the black flag rises over Stockholm, then remaining nations may be inclined to discipline their states. And when that begins, not even chants of “nazi” will stop the charge.

The Administration #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

I’m certain many of you have already seen this report. It is a piece pondering the absolutely inexplicable conundrum of why IQs seem to be on a significant downward trajectory. Specifically it mentions the UK, Denmark, and Australia as three countries whose collective IQs have deteriorated in the past decade alone. Science is baffled—journalists flummoxed. Apparently the effect is quite dramatic in those professions particularly.

Though before even tugging the first string of this unravellable mystery as to what could account for lower IQs in those three countries, I’ll type a few unrelated terms that appear nowhere in the article:

Race
Demographics
Population composition

As I qualified, these are all wholly unrelated to an IQ trend and I mention them only because of their importance to my friend, Eric Holder.

Reading further I noticed the following passage as a particularly poignant example of our media’s declining cognition.

Some believe the Flynn effect has masked a decline in the genetic basis for intelligence, so that while more people have been reaching their full potential, that potential itself has been declining.

Some have even contentiously said this could be because educated people are deciding to have fewer children, so that subsequent generations are largely made up of less intelligent people.

You see, the notion that the West’s complementary intelligence reduction programs of massive immigration and incentivization toward dysgenic reproduction are actually working quite well is—contentious. To whom exactly is not noted. But we can be sure the trend line of their IQ resembles the chicken wing inventory at a lunchtime Popeye’s.

northern refugee #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

Close your eyes—

Could you imagine if traditionalist whites adopted some of the tactics of ghetto blacks? A martial people, over-represented in the military and law enforcement, skilled in the use of firearms. Imagine what organized bands of such people could accomplish when engaged in civil disobedience. They could easily take control of vital economic choke points (energy, agriculture, transport), and shut down the Economy. They could infiltrate and neutralize the the military. Pursuing their own interests, they could bend the federal government to their whims, and carve out a space of their own—

You can’t? Well, neither can I. Brazil is the best case scenario, Zimbabwe the worst.

The Administration #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

We recently discussed the notion that only the rich wield influence over the geography of America’s policy direction. As events in Missouri amply display, that’s not entirely true. So untrue that perhaps the earlier thesis requires what should now be the standard disclaimer for all societal analysis: who/whom supersedes all prior contentions. Poor and middle class whites are ignored utterly by policy makers. Destitute, economically parasitic blacks—are not.

And why this is so could not be more obvious. When whites are ignored, they grumble sotto voce and are then subsequently fired for racism when a liberal howler monkey overhears. When blacks are ignored, skulls fracture, goods flee their aisles, black panthers supplant city officials at the podium, buildings spontaneously combust, and whites are investigated for “civil rights” infractions. The “if then” equations are so rudimentary that even most politicians can understand: keep blacks placated at all costs. This, unfortunately, being a solution with finite capacity, though infinite demand.

And, as in all other aspects of life, conservatives stumble along 18 moves behind their opponents. How many times I have read now complaints that “blacks say nothing about blacks killing other blacks!” Of course they say nothing about it, you flighty flag wavers. Whatever they do among themselves, you may not harm a black regardless of circumstance. *They, of course, do not hold themselves to a reciprocal standard. Unlike you, they care not a whit about some disintegrating parchment in the National Archives. They understand the Law of Rule implicitly. They are neither constitutionalists nor colorblind. They are openly, unapologetically racist. They have no qualms chanting for your death. And despite suffering a significant IQ deficit, they are unceremoniously kicking your ass around and off the planet. As I have asserted before, natural selection favors not the smartest or strongest–but the least delusional. And delusion seems to be our civilization’s chief export in this terminal stage.

And so where will this proceed? Obviously law enforcement officers are going to grow wary to the point of refusal in confronting recalcitrant black criminals. Who would do otherwise? The Ferguson police officer faces not career, but life ruination. This will be a lesson well remembered. I would imagine many future scenes of blacks looting businesses at their leisure as police wheel about, sirens blazing, to arrest the white jaywalker across the street. We will have two-tier law enforcement as rigid as our university matriculation standards.

What can be learned? Whites are going to have to stand up for something beyond their favorite all-black football team. The confrontation at the Bundy Ranch might prove to be a useful model. Be loud, be public, don’t back down, and above all record everything. Of course any agitators will be forced to endure the most lethal ordnance in society’s quiver–being called racist. And everything will depend upon their capacity to weather such a fusillade of crippling barbs from implacable enemies. Perhaps in this they can take heart, counsel, and several cases of filched beer, from the Ferguson protestors.

The Administration #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

With the World Cup now resolved to its final, there’s hardly an athletic event to pique my interest until the 2017 Maccabiah Games. Though one imagines by that breathless summer all American residential structures will be designated as public accommodations, and thus subject to the wise progressions of Latina jurisprudence.

So I anticipate the pleasant trill of mariachi music emanating from the penumbras of my east wing, where seven formerly itinerant families from Guadalajara will have taken root. Those dulcet tones will offer a compelling score for those dramatic moments when my public accommodation–or heretofore “home”–is disturbed by peals of Spanish braying. This a nightly occurrence when the pregnant teenaged daughter of my neighbor/roommates is visited by her boyfriend, recently invigorated by MS-13 induction and a pint of 10-peso mescal. Of course tempers will tend to flare in the unairconditioned summers of rolling brown-outs. And so how refreshing in contrast will be the cool stainless steel of his revolver as it is used mischievously to wipe the nervous grease from my gringo brow.

But I’ve gotten a bit ahead of myself.

Let’s talk about the freedom of association. It would seem fundamental to any raft of liberties that a man could select his own associations by whimsy. Who one chooses to lavish with their presence is hardly a matter requiring explanation, unless it is to spouse or God. But this is modern America, and it has been a long time since you heard someone of sober mind say earnestly, “It’s a free country.”

So it’s strange to imagine that what must have been so obvious as to not warrant mention wasn’t actually developed as explicit legal doctrine in America until the 1950s. This as an appeasement to black agitations for self-organization–or something like that . What emerged from the cases put before our most eminent tribunal is that people do have a right to organize and join associations of like-minded others.

That seems reasonable. So a group of men can create a formal association, establish membership parameters of their choosing, police those boundaries stringently, and refuse entry or interaction with those outside these boundaries. No, don’t be ridiculous. That’s discrimination, and it’s illegal. See freedom of association means you may associate with (for example) blacks, browns, yellows, and taupe. Non-discrimination means you will associate with them. That’s what freedom is all about: helping you make difficult decisions. Though if you remain unconvinced that certain non-associations are impermissible, just try to establish an organization for jews, blacks, amerinds, or asians only. Well, perhaps that’s not the best example.

Though now that we understand some working concepts, who is familiar with the Freedom of Association in Westchester County, New York? Here is one article. And here is another. Basically, a county took the Faustian bargain of federal handouts and subsequently learned that their tree-lined residential suburbs didn’t feature nearly enough low rent apartments and Section 8 gunfire. Uh-oh.

According to the federal department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD, contemptuously) Westchester county does have its rights. It has the right to spend at least $51 million dollars to build 750 units of housing for lower income people in 31 so-called eligible or mostly white communities by the end of 2016. We all understand to whom “lower income” euphemistically refers. Though stipulating that these units will specifically be targeting “mostly white communities” is quite a stark fang baring from the government. Not only will you build them housing, you’ll build it right beside you.

And there it is: forced integration, busing for after school—and you pay the bill. This is dispossession at the personal level. It is a once flaccid totalitarianism becoming pleasantly engorged. It is taking your community, your home value, and your social capital and shitting it out on the sidewalk. Why? Raysis, that’s why. And it will remain why until either a people or the piety that binds them has lost everything.

Though back to 2017—Once HUD has peremptorily rezoned your house as multi-family and an impressive immigrant caravan disgorges its clown-car inventory with housing vouchers in hand, will you recall your freedoms of association? Perhaps an old mariachi tune well help.

The Administration #racist kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com

*fundie here is trying to pick on leftists by parodying their talking points, or something*

As a follow-on from the previous entry, the Washington Post just reported on more racial violence in Iraq stemming from the Jim Crow policies of the Yazidi hate-group. Excerpts below.

"DAHUK, Iraq — Extremist fighters have killed more than 80 men and detained hundreds of women in a Yazidi village, Yazidis and Kurdish officials said Saturday, offering a reminder that the ancient minority sect is still at risk despite President Obama’s conclusion that the threat had passed for those stranded on Mount Sinjar.

Islamic State militants drove into the village of Kocho, about 15 miles southwest of the town of Sinjar, on Friday, following a week-long siege in which the al-Qaeda inspired group demanded that residents convert to Islam or face death, said the reports, which could not be independently verified.

The men were rounded up and executed, while the women were taken to an undisclosed location, according to Ziad Sinjar, a pesh merga commander based on the edge of Mount Sinjar, citing the accounts of villagers nearby. Six men were injured but survived, and managed to escape to a nearby village where they are being sheltered by sympathetic local Sunni Iraqis, he said. One of them told him that 84 Yazidi men were lined up and shot and that more than 300 women were taken away.

Yazidi activists and Kurdish officials said at least 80 men were killed and hundreds of women taken away after the fighters entered the village shortly after 1 pm on Friday."

Though unnecessary, we should state the obvious: this is how the Fright-Wing noise machine operates. Notice the designation of the ISIS community as “extremist” when it is in fact they who are marginalized in Iraqi society and Yazidis who are the segregationists.

The fact is that Iraq is a large country and sometimes 80 men are put against the wall and shot. These are random youth robberies gone wrong. To even attempt to pin blame on an ISIS community that itself already suffers so much violence is outrageous. We should be thinking of how to end the cycle of poverty that traps these young men in a world without hope. We should be providing education and opportunity to Iraq’s most at-risk.

Suggesting the existence of a “Yazidi knock-out game” serves no purpose other than to perpetuate a hateful racial stereotype that has no place in modern Iraq.

Many in the ISIS community feel the Yazidis don’t even care about them. Aside from discriminatory housing practices, ISIS civil-rights leaders complain that Yazidis routinely pass them over in hiring and promotional opportunities. One glance at the shocking figures of ISIS under representation will quickly validate the assertion.

Instead of inflaming ancient hatreds by rumor mongering of alleged “massacres,” Yazidi leaders should instead be working to integrate the ISIS people and bring them out of the shadows. And that seems to be the greatest struggle of all. Because at this point the Yazidis have not yet learned to be multicultural. That can be a difficult transition for those with ingrained notions of bigotry. But without that transition, the Yazidi people will not survive.

Peace in both Iraq and the Middle East as a whole hinges entirely on the rejection of segregation and an embrace of diversity. It is only when Jew, Alawite, Shia, Yazidi, Sunni, Christian, and Kurd are living house to house and side by side that harmony will finally come to this scarred land.