Show post
StugLife #racist identitydixie.com

[From "For Pity’s Sake"]

There is a saying often seen in the Dissident Right when there is a revelation of some pretty young girl who has made the poor decision to engage in a “romantic” relationship with a man of color. Often, the saying is, “Burn the Coal, Pay the Toll.” These women often end up pregnant, battered, abandoned and, sometimes, even dead. It’s a sad and sorry state of affairs we only really observe in the fallen material hellscape of the American Empire.

I take no issue with warning against these dangers. The NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) argument can be made, of course, and it will be, as a defense to these women’s poor decisions. The chances of a native Christian woman ending up with a black man is about 15% as of 2010 (Pew Research), however, most whites in an interracial relationship are Hispanic/White or Asian/White, despite the surge in White/Black relationships in almost every television commercial you see.

The domestic violence rates among minority marriages (Black/Black, Hispanic/Hispanic, etc) is over half (56%), whereas whites sit at about one in four (25.6%). A relatively recent study displays how this works out. An interracial couple is 1.5 times as likely to have domestic violence (over monoracial minorities, twice as likely as whites) and over half are cohabiting or dating, compared with 47% reporting they are married (5% of 10,000 couples sampled to make comparisons between monoracial and interracial couples).

So, while it is perfectly sound to warn young impressionable women to steer clear of minorities, the schadenfreude often displayed at their misfortune is honestly disheartening. We hold ourselves to high standards of morality and ethics, but the first chance we get to run someone’s nose into their mess we jump on it, especially for the dead. We shouldn’t be approaching near celebratory glee when we see a story about a young woman, who has been all but programmed to make this horrific mistake, make the mistake. It should be mourned and used, as best as possible, as a dire warning to other young women who received the same indoctrination in the propaganda camps (what we call schools and media).

Use arguments against this in a way she will understand and relate to, if you just simply call it disgusting – the woman is likely to be defiant and go into it with more enthusiasm and find herself in a wood coat waiting for the Resurrection. If she is Christian, there are multiple verses that can be used to argue your case. The most simple is in a nice handy list of things the Good Lord wishes for you to follow fully. It’s simple and easy to remember, “Thou shalt honor the mother and father.” The separation of nations in Genesis can be used as well. If they argue back with, “No Jew nor Greek, Man or Woman” ask why God created the various nations and put them in their own lands. Do they know better than God?

If she is extremely materialistic, simple economic arguments and the rate of single motherhood of mixed ethnicity children and the dysfunction in those homes is a simple argument. It’s hard to enjoy material pleasures when you have a mixed race child to support and are alone.

Our modern dystopia has already destroyed the patriarchy it hates so much. Women disregard their fathers’ advice as it’s not pertinent to them in the age of strong independent women. If, and when, Tyrone beats them, they will come crawling back to those old protections they desire so much. What happens then depends on the strength of the men in the family. Do they turn away what is their own “prodigal son” returning home? Or, do they take her back in after her failure to honor them and her family? This is a question I am thankful I never had to answer with my sister.

As Christian men we must do what we can to bring the morality of our families and, especially, of our wayward daughters back to the foundations our ancestors and their ancestors laid before us. Being Christian is meant to be a difficult life, not an easy one.

Show post
JC_Hinson #fundie identitydixie.com

[From "What is Southern Fascism?"]

Southern Fascism is showing up with your legally armed and regulated militia to protest the proposed building of a mosque in your town, succeeding in shutting the muslim colonizers down, and later that night enjoying your victory around a bonfire. Southern Fascism is walking into an invader owned store just to tell them to get the hell out of your state, and then driving the extra miles to support your fellow White man, thanking him for his service each and every time you frequent his business. Southern Fascism is denying the charities for Haiti and North Africa, in order to donate to your own folk when they need a helping hand.

Southern Fascism is stonewalling the pompous blacks in the gym, and seconds later shaking a White elder’s hand, smiling warmly and always referring to him as, “Sir.” Southern Fascism is lifting heavy in the morning and pickin’ and grinnin’ at night. Southern Fascism is walking through a crowd of invaders in a parking lot, forcing them out of your way, and then stopping to help an older White lady load groceries into her sedan. Southern Fascism is holding the door for your own, and only your own.

Southern Fascism is pissing on Abraham Lincoln’s grave, and then defending the Robert E. Lee statue from being torn down. Southern Fascism is shooting holes in the, “I’m with Her” signs, driving across town, and shooting holes in the Trump signs too.

Southern Fascism is pulling into the largest White Nationalist meeting held in 15 years, riding in a giant White truck proclaiming, “UNRECONSTRUCTED” in large White letters on the back window, the bed filled with proud White Southerners, the Stars & Bars flying high.

Southern Fascism is laughing at the mexican walking down the side of the road, and then pulling right over to tow your fellow White man out of that damn Georgia red. Southern Fascism is shaming wiggers and never embracing an alien, no matter how, “based” they look in their “Rebel” hat.

Southern Fascism is waking up early to wet a line, but arriving promptly at 11:00 a.m. to take your Granny for brunch at her favorite buffet. Southern Fascism is baked chicken and hot sauce, green beans and yams, NO potato salad, NO cobbler. Southern Fascism is iced tea, NO sugar.

Southern Fascism is naming the JEW, and calling the state of Israel what they are: a den of vipers. Southern Fascism is going to a church where your scholarly and righteous pastor preaches both sides of God’s true nature, and does so with a loaded 9mm under his vest. Southern Fascism is disciplining your children when they err, and blessing them when they make you proud.

Southern Fascism is correctly judging when a dog must be put down and not hesitating to do so, but weeping the loss of a loyal friend later. Southern Fascism is making “Jack Hinson did nothing wrong” memes and always referring to the “War of Northern Aggression” by this only acceptable title.

Southern Fascism is courteously explaining exactly what you love and support, and everything you stand for, with NO compromise and NO apology. Southern Fascism is joining the Sons of Confederate Veterans and refusing to disrespect your forefathers that bled for their people and this land by flying that damn federal flag over their graves.

Southern Fascism is being the only man to loudly protest White dispossession in your city council meeting, while everyone else insists upon sitting there “politely.” Southern Fascism is waiting patiently when arguing with an urbanite, only to better prove them wrong when they falter. Southern Fascism is telling your woman what to do and how to do it, and maybe giving her some loving later, if it’s not hunting season.

Southern Fascism is loving your people more than any other earthly possession. Southern Fascism is the unrelenting preservation of our sacred heritage and rich culture. Southern Fascism is respecting the people that brought us here, and the men that fight for it now. Ultimately, Southern Fascism is us; one united brotherhood, the heirs of a pioneered inheritance, and the mentors of the future South.

Show post
Identity Dixie #fundie identitydixie.com

[From "Alt-South Lexicon"]

American/Federal Empire

Refers to the United States since forcibly annexing the Confederate States in 1860-64. Hated in the South for sending Southerners to fight in futile wars for interests not their own. More concerned with pushing a globalist agenda to benefit the oligarchy than acting in the interests of its native population. Synonyms: The Great Satan, Zog.

Bug-Men

“Small-souled creatures that look barely human, believe strongly in having modeled “rational” takes, and are defined completely by their choices as an alpha-consumer. (Courtesy~Borzoi Boskovitch)

Churchian

A person who holds the beliefs of their particular church or denomination to be sacrosanct. They will often reject teachings of the Bible that don’t align properly with their church’s ideas concerning modern societal issues.

Cuckfederate

A person who purports to be a Confederate, but is in actuality reconstructed. These people are easily identified by excessive posting of the battle flag in Facebook groups and a need to signal to everyone that they are not racist. They can often be observed to condemn the racist viewpoints of their confederate ancestors. Favorite phrase: “Heritage, not hate.”

Dindu

A negro. Referred to as such because they dindu nuffin. All criminal and degenerate actions they take can be explained away because of the systematic oppression inflicted upon them by the evil white man.

Dixian

Also called Southerners (esp. when affixed with “unreconstructed”), Southern people, Dixians, Dixie people, Dixie nation, Confederates. A European-derived, Christian nation and ethnic group native to Dixie, biologically descended primarily from the British and Scots-Irish peoples who settled the region during the Colonial Period and Plantation Era, who remain distinct from other branches of the British diaspora and without significant admixture from African or Amerindian races. Ethnic Dixians speak their own widely recognized dialect of the English language and retain other cultural distinctions apart from the North Midlands and East Anglia derived cultures of North America.

Numale

A modern male with a low testosterone level who acts with beta tendicies. These “men” include but are not limited to male feminists, soyboys, and beta orbiters.

Reconstructed

A term which refers to people or things that were originally Southern in nature but have fallen prey to the policies imposed by the federal government and progressive culture post Civil War. A physical manifestation of this is the removal of confederate monuments and memorials to appease minority groups and progressives. A cultural manifestation of this is people, who are Southern by heritage, apologizing for the racism of their ancestors.

Unreconstructed

A term which refers to people or things that have not capitulated to being reconstructed. Southerners who are unreconstructed eschew modern societal norms and mores in favor of a more traditional culture from the antebellum South.

UrbaNEET

An urbanite who is also a NEET. A NEET is a low agency individual who usually still lives with their parents and whose sole ambitions are obtaining food and playing video games. A genetic dead end, as they will likely never produce offspring.

Urbanite

A person residing in an urban area. These people usually have beliefs modeled after the progressive trends of modernity and are deeply afflicted with the sickness that is Cultural Marxism. They tend to view Southerners as a recalcitrant people whom they must force to do what they perceive to be the right thing.

Show post
Larry Ridgeway #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Give Us Us Free: A Story of Stupidity"]

In my life I have seen many things. Things, often times that I cannot help but ask myself “How?” or “Why?” Recently though, on the morning of July 8th, I read something that would make the most stoic man rise in anger. Shall we beat it into the heads of the eternal normie that these colored hordes have no sense of justice?

In the morning hours of July 5th in Savannah, Georgia, three blacks were out on the town for a drive. Not the kind of drive our people are accustomed to though. Not at all. They were on the type of drive where they go find members of another warring tribe within their race, shoot at them from their vehicle (ignoring the safety of others) and speed off and break numerous traffic violations to get away from the scene of their latest crime. Yes, a drive-by shooting.

Three colored males were injured in the shooting. After the shooting, the driver, 17 year old Jerry Chambers, led police on a chase that ended with the fleeing suspects wrecking at the intersection of Bay and Barnard street into a pedestrian-filled sidewalk. In doing so, they killed one and injured five. The man killed was a general manger of a downtown bar called “The Grey” – the man’s name was Scott Waldrup (white man). He was thirty years old.

It has been said by several witnesses at the scene that he jumped in the way of the vehicle, pushing children out of the way and saving their lives at the expense of his own. He died a hero. Mighty white of him.

The two other sub-human chimpanzees occupying the crashed vehicle also died. Can I get a hallelujah? It’s less monsters out on the street. Jerry Chambers was arrested and charged with three counts of murder.

Now the story I just told would be triggering enough if that were all. It’s not.

Turns out that Jerry (send him to the gas) Chambers was the same animal charged in the armed robbery last summer – his victim was a 63 year old woman. He and another suspect (who was not charged) beat this woman mercilessly and when she fought back, they shot her. He turned himself in two days later.

The police said they had what they thought to be a good case, but he ended up being found not guilty for a number of dog shit reasons. His attorney argued that he was the only person charged with the crime and the victim’s statement said she slammed her trunk on the fingers of one assailant. Chambers had no corresponding injury and that he could only be charged as a “party to the crime” at best. Since I can’t find the name of the attorney and the fact that those are some obnoxious and bullshit arguments, arguments that make the pursuit of justice an impossible goal to attain, I’ll just assume the attorney was some (((slime ball))).

Chambers was tried for attempted robbery (they couldn’t pursue the armed robbery because they couldn’t verify that money was actually taken, if they got nothing, they beat and shot this woman for no reason) and he was found NOT GUILTY. Yes, not guilty. He walked free to kill a man last week and injure five others.

Are you sick of reading or hearing about these same fucking stories week in and week out? Every day you hear talk of injustice for the black man, injustice for the spics, injustice for the sodomites and, dare I forget, injustice for the fucked up people who don’t know their own damn gender.

What about justice for the white man? The fact this piece of shit is charged with three murders is absurd. Murder implies you are taking the life of another human. These other chimps weren’t human. They were scum. Gang members, drug dealing, old-woman-beating-apes – is all they were. This punk should get a medal for killing them and then be promptly led to the gallows.

The fact of the matter is, and it’s shown every fucking day, that black people and having nice shit cannot happen. A stroll on the sidewalk does not make you exempt from their carelessness and violence. Let Scott Waldrup, a selfless hero, be all you need to understand that we cannot peacefully coexist with them.

I’m sure, however, that this will continue and whitey will turn away from it.

Continue on.

Show post
Jedidiah Van Horn #sexist identitydixie.com

[From "Sexual Utopia in Power"]

It is well known to readers of this journal that white birthrates worldwide have suffered a catastrophic decline in recent decades. During this same period, ours has become assuredly the most sex-obsessed society in the history of the world. Two such massive, concurrent trends are hardly likely to be unrelated. Many well-meaning conservatives agree in deploring the present situation, but do not agree in describing that situation or how it arose. Correct diagnosis is the first precondition for effective strategy.

The well-worn phrase “sexual revolution” ought, I believe, to be taken with more than customary seriousness. Like the French Revolution, the paradigmatic political revolution of modern times, it was an attempt to realize a utopia, but a sexual rather than political utopia. And like the French Revolution, it has gone through three phases: first, a libertarian or anarchic phase in which the utopia was supposed to occur spontaneously once old ways had been swept aside; second, a reign of terror, in which one faction seized power and attempted to realize its schemes dictatorially; and third, a “reaction” in which human nature gradually reasserted itself. We shall follow this order in the present essay.

Two Utopias

Let us consider what a sexual utopia is, and let us begin with men, who are in every respect simpler.

Nature has played a trick on men: production of spermatozoa occurs at a rate several orders of magnitude greater than female ovulation (about 12 million per hour vs. 400 per lifetime). This is a natural, not a moral, fact. Among the lower animals also, the male is grossly oversupplied with something for which the female has only a limited demand. This means that the female has far greater control over mating. The universal law of nature is that males display and females choose. Male peacocks spread their tales, females choose. Male rams butt horns, females choose. Among humans, boys try to impress girls—and the girls choose. Nature dictates that in the mating dance, the male must wait to be chosen.

A man’s sexual utopia is, accordingly, a world in which no such limit to female demand for him exists. It is not necessary to resort to pornography for example. Consider only popular movies aimed at a male audience, such as the James Bond series. Women simply cannot resist James Bond. He does not have to propose marriage, or even request dates. He simply walks into the room and they swoon. The entertainment industry turns out endless images such as this. Why, the male viewer eventually may ask, cannot life actually be so? To some, it is tempting to put the blame on the institution of marriage.

Marriage, after all, seems to restrict sex rather drastically. Certain men figure that if sex were permitted both inside and outside of marriage there would have to be twice as much sex as formerly. They imagined there existed a large, untapped reservoir of female desire hitherto repressed by monogamy. To release it, they sought, during the early postwar period, to replace the seventh commandment with an endorsement of all sexual activity between “consenting adults.” Every man could have a harem. Sexual behavior in general, and not merely family life, was henceforward to be regarded as a private matter. Traditionalists who disagreed were said to want to “put a policeman in every bedroom.” This was the age of the Kinsey Reports and the first appearance of Playboy magazine. Idle male daydreams had become a social movement.

This characteristically male sexual utopianism of the early postwar years was a forerunner of the sexual revolution but not the revolution itself. Men are incapable of bringing about revolutionary changes in heterosexual relations without the cooperation—the famed “consent”—of women. But the original male would-be revolutionaries did not understand the nature of the female sex instinct. That is why things have not gone according to their plan.

What is the special character of feminine sexual desire that distinguishes it from that of men?

It is sometimes said that men are polygamous and women monogamous. Such a belief is often implicit in the writings of “conservative” male commentators: Women only want good husbands, but heartless men use and abandon them. Some evidence does appear, prima facie, to support such a view. One 1994 survey found that “while men projected they would ideally like 6 sex partners over the next year, and 8 over the next two years, women responded that their ideal would be to have only one partner over the next year. And over two years? The answer, for women, was still one.”[1] Is this not evidence that women are naturally monogamous?

No, it is not. Women know their own sexual urges are unruly, but traditionally have had enough sense to keep quiet about it. A husband’s belief that his wife is naturally monogamous makes for his own peace of mind. It is not to a wife’s advantage, either, that her husband understand her too well: Knowledge is power. In short, we have here a kind of Platonic “noble lie”—a belief which is salutary, although false.

It would be more accurate to say that the female sexual instinct is hypergamous. Men may have a tendency to seek sexual variety, but women have simple tastes in the manner of Oscar Wilde: They are always satisfied with the best. By definition, only one man can be the best. These different male and female “sexual orientations” are clearly seen among the lower primates, e.g., in a baboon pack. Females compete to mate at the top, males to get to the top.

Women, in fact, have a distinctive sexual utopia corresponding to their hypergamous instincts. In its purely utopian form, it has two parts: First, she mates with her incubus, the imaginary perfect man; and, second, he “commits,” or ceases mating with all other women. This is the formula of much pulp romance fiction. The fantasy is strictly utopian, partly because no perfect man exists, but partly also because even if he did, it is logically impossible for him to be the exclusive mate of all the women who desire him.

It is possible, however, to enable women to mate hypergamously, i.e., with the most sexually attractive (handsome or socially dominant) men. In the Ecclesiazusae of Aristophanes the women of Athens stage a coup d’état. They occupy the legislative assembly and barricade their husbands out. Then they proceed to enact a law by which the most attractive males of the city will be compelled to mate with each female in turn, beginning with the least attractive. That is the female sexual utopia in power. Aristophanes had a better understanding of the female mind than the average husband.

[...]

Fallout of the Revolution: “Date Rape”

A few years into the sexual revolution, shocking reports began to appear of vast numbers of young women—from one quarter to half—being victims of rape. Shock turned to bewilderment when the victims were brought forward to tell their stories. The “rapists,” it turns out, were never lying in wait for them in remote corners, were not armed, did not attack them. Instead, these “date rapes” occur in private places, usually college dormitory rooms, and involve no threats or violence. In fact, they little resemble what most of us think of as rape.

What was going on here?

Take a girl too young to understand what erotic desire is and subject her to several years of propaganda to the effect that she has a right to have things any way she wants them in this domain—with no corresponding duties to God, her parents, or anyone else. Do not give her any guidance as to what it might be good for her to want, how she might try to regulate her own conduct, or what qualities she ought to look for in a young man. Teach her furthermore that the notion of natural differences between the sexes is a laughable superstition that our enlightened age is gradually overcoming—with the implication that men’s sexual desires are no different from or more intense than her own. Meanwhile, as she matures physically, keep her protected in her parents’ house, sheltered from responsibility.

Then, at age seventeen or eighteen, take her suddenly away from her family and all the people she has ever known. She can stay up as late as she wants! She can decide for herself when and how much to study! She’s making new friends all the time, young women and men both. It’s no big deal having them over or going to their rooms; everybody is perfectly casual about it. What difference does it make if it’s a boy she met at a party? He seems like a nice fellow, like others she meets in class.

Now let us consider the young man she is alone with. He is neither a saint nor a criminal, but, like all normal young men of college years, he is intensely interested in sex. There are times he cannot study without getting distracted by the thought of some young woman’s body. He has had little real experience with girls, and most of that unhappy. He has been rejected a few times with little ceremony, and it was more humiliating than he cares to admit. He has the impression that for other young men things are not as difficult: “Everybody knows,” after all, that since the 1960s men get all the sex they like, right? He is bombarded with talk about sex on television, in the words to popular songs, in rumors about friends who supposedly “scored” with this or that girl. He begins to wonder if there isn’t something wrong with him.

Furthermore, he has received the same education about sex as the girl he is now with. He has learned that people have the right to do anything they want. The only exception is rape. But that is hardly even relevant to him; he is obviously incapable of doing something like that.

Show post
Frank Einstein, MD #conspiracy identitydixie.com

[From "Dr. Gerberding or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Vaccines"]

Welcome my fellow goyim; my name is Dr. Frank Einstein and I am here to calm your uneasiness on the question of vaccines. Many of you may or may not know that here recently a lady was jailed due to the fact that she refused to follow the court order to vaccinate her child. The child thankfully has since been vaccinated. Nothing like a little government intervention to give Progress the boost it needs from time to time. Just imagine where the South would be if there had been no forced integration back in the sixties.

Now lets start off with the most ludicrous claim: vaccines cause Autism. As many of you know these claims have been around for quite sometime now and there have been countless studies debunking this fraudulent accusation. The fact that they refuse to do Double Blind Placebo test for most vaccinations is totally irrelevant. I mean how negligent and uncaring would our government have to be to mass-produce vaccines for the public without actually testing them for side affects, if they were potentially that harmful. If you want an example of the wrong way for a government to handle it look at Japan. They just simply banned the MMR vaccine after noticing a large part of the population started developing adverse affects (only including a few instances of Autism, blindness, and death). But what would you expect from a country that allows its schools to use Mein Kampf as “teaching material”. Another argument these delusional people will make, is that the minuscule amounts of heavy metals somehow cause it.

It’s not like the stuff is being injected directly into your child’s bloodstream. If anything this abrupt rise in Autism is a genetic defect due to homogeneous societies. Diversity, our greatest strength, will undoubtedly solve this within a few generations.

Of course there are a few other concerns like how the vaccine industry is set to make $61 billion dollars in profit by 2020. So what if international corporations make a lucrative profit off what you’re injecting into your children, just think of all the refugees they’ve saved by allowing them to acclimate to our society through the miracle of vaccines. Or how we have the highest rate of SIDS in the industrialized world and we are also the most heavily vaccinated. It’s just another freak coincidence my fellow goy, giving these coincidences too much attention can be dangerous. Before too long you’ll be buying into all these conspiracies about globalism and our greatest ally Israel. Speaking of this blessed race the American Jewish Committee gave Julie Gerberding their first ever Woman’s Global Leadership Award. She earned this from not only her tenure as the director of the CDC, but also her current career at Merck where she is the head of their vaccine division. She is truly a champion of global industry and health.

In closing I know there are a few things still not covered such as the infamous “vaccine court” among other things. Yes, there will still be naysayers, people not convinced by the facts so conveniently placed before them. This short essay will in no way placate all the emotional soccer moms enraged at the fact that their precious child may never become potty trained much less start a family of their own. They will have to search a little longer before they can so easily lay the blame elsewhere. I’m just here to remind those of you who aren’t yet too far gone that vaccines are 100% absolutely never ever going to be dangerous.

Don’t look into it. There’s no need. After all you can trust me, I’m a doctor.

Show post
Silas Reynolds #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Bob Goodlatte: Make the Shenandoah San Salvador!"]

It never changes does it. If you’re a student of Virginia politics, you know full well that most of the state is being demographically and politically transformed by both internal (think Yankee shitlibs, cucks and transplants) and external immigration (think Third World refuse). Most of our Republican leadership isn’t even made up of actual Virginians. See the ugly mug associated with this article, it’s none other than Massachusetts native, now a Virginia trvecon, Bob Goodlatte.

What globalist tricks are the cucks up to this time? Displace the current native Virginians, as well as the rest of the country, with one million low-wage, foreign guest-workers. If the globalist shills have their way, these indispensable new serfs will be granted citizenship and likely vote Republicans in office (end sarcasm).

[...]

We all know these cucks want to make Pedro and Francisco citizens, because that’s what cuckservatives do – they displace the native population because of their Chamber of Commerce (or in this case, Big Agriculture) overlords and “muh economy” reasons. Never mind the actual Virginians in Goodlatte’s district of Roanoke, Lynchburg, Harrisonburg and Staunton that could use actual employment opportunities.

Further from Breitbart regarding this demographic Russian roulette that Goodlatte is playing:

The bill is designed to provide the food industry with many cheap workers — while also preventing those imported workers from becoming U.S. citizens, or from having children born in the United States. That worker-to-citizen process has proved deadly for the Republican Party in Democratic-run California but also in Goodlatte’s home state of Virginia, where a large number of immigrants has turned the once GOP state into a Democratic-leaning state.

[...]

Obligatory reminder on immigration voting patterns.

[Immigrants vote for Democrats]

American Farm Bureau Federation President, Zippy (sounds like a real dickhead) Duvall, said the proposed guestworker visa program, “would bring much-needed improvements to the current system while addressing the needs of our current workforce and providing a streamlined visa process for skilled agricultural workers in the future. Although Farm Bureau members have concerns on certain points, such as capping the number of visas, we stand ready to work with Chairman Goodlatte and members of Congress to refine these provisions for the good of all U.S. agriculture.”

We all know the score – cheap brown labor for Big Business, while the natives indulge in Welfare and opioid addiction, that’s the prevailing opinion among our enemies anyway. But, unfortunately, there’s some truth to it as well. I mean, it’s not like Virginia has any opioid problems, right (click link)?

The real issue here is the cabal of globalist and weak men, in this case a transplant Yankee (carpetbagger, really), don’t give a damn about us. Instead of statesmen working on providing employment opportunities for actual Virginians, we have traitors like Goodlatte looking to score points with Big Ag by legislating a Third World invasion under the guise of poor poultry workers.

When the Shenandoah Valley starts looking like San Salvador, we can thank the Yankee from Holyoke, Massachusetts .

Show post
Larry Ridgeway #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Minneapolis: A Response to the Chimp"]

So on July 15th, Justine Ruszczyk,40, was gunned down by Mohamed Noor, a Somalian immigrant “cop” (fucking diversity hire) with what seems to be no provocation, from the passenger seat of his police cruiser while she was engaged in conversation with Noor’s partner. We know this. I wrote an article about it. Of course you read it….

Since the shooting, a certain Minneapolis City Council Member, Abdi Warsame, has been “pushing back” against the media, racism and Islamophobia. Well I, Larry Ridgeway, am here to “push back” against him and his brown hordes who wish to come here and colonize our country.

[...]

Well, Ali Baba the thing is that it is unclear why officer Noor shot this woman. This white woman. This white woman in pajamas. His backwards desert cult culture that believes women should be covered from head to toe in what is basically the same as wearing a cloth garbage bag (garbage bag for garbage people) probably has nothing to do with this situation? Give me a break.

[...]

Okay, so it is now a moral imperative to take into consideration the east African community when we recognize the differences in culture and the incapability these literal savages exhibit when it comes to basic societal interactions? Get fucked. This is the white mans country. We owe you no explanations as to why we notice the incompatibility and feel animosity towards your community. The browner this place gets, the shittier it becomes. Your IQ (which is so low most of you won’t be able to read this) makes you unable to be in a high trust society.

[...]

You are assuming that because this brown being masquerading as a human has papers “legalizing” his “American” citizenship makes him American. Nothing could be further from the truth. You people bring you mental inadequacy and shit tier culture from the mud huts in Africa and through your inability to assimilate and not commit violent acts makes this, in a much broader sense, a Somalian problem. You people should not be here, much less hold positions of authority.

Any authority. You people definitely should not have access to firearms.

The white cops you are whining about are actually American citizens. They have been here for generations and since they operate in their daily lives without violent outbursts, they can be trusted to uphold the laws they don’t fucking break. This is common sense, but it’s not surprising mud people with an IQ below the equivalent to a resting heart rate can’t understand this.

[...]

Ever since imported Africans became considered citizens (how they became people truly baffles me) there has been a race problem. Not in the sense you mean, it but in the sense that more than one race exists in this country. You really ought to leave. Experiment is over.

We all know Islam is out of the question and has always been a problem. Fuck the outliers. Also, fuck you.

This is the attempt at colonization by these people. It begins in the mind of the host. By planting the idea that race is just skin color and we can all exist in harmony, the parasitic entity convinces the host to make concessions that weaken itself and attempt to put the parasite on the same level as the host. First the mind, then the land.

It is important for the residents of not only Minneapolis, but the United States as a whole, to know that its okay to push back at these people. We are defending our posterity’s right to a home, to exist and to continue as a race. The system our ancestors created will not exist if we allow the infiltration of our institutions by these Third World heathens.

Show post
Larry Ridgeway #fundie identitydixie.com

[From "Take Your Place"]

Through the years a war has been waged. Racially and culturally. Whites, a once proud people, have been handed defeat after defeat it seems since the 1960’s. The country our grandparents lived in and enjoyed is vastly different than the one we have today. A person conscious of this, yet not on our side, would ask himself why this is. Why is it that things seem to be getting worse? Also, why is it that such seemingly small numbers of people are the only ones willing to do anything about it?

As history has shown us, Whites have been a people that flourished because of their ambition to pursue the interests of their race. They accomplished great things for the sake of themselves and their people. There was a sense of racial awareness that made this all subconscious to them, but it served them well. The reason for their existence was to improve their lot for the sake of future generations.

The push forward. The more ground they could traverse for their family, the further ahead they could place their race, the better. Well, what happened?

Truth is, there are many things that have happened.

Through integration in the 60’s many Whites have been brought down to the level of Blacks. Many adopt their music as if it is their own. Many dress and carry themselves like their black counterparts.

Through these things come the attitude of the Black. The mentality of the eternal underachiever. The White has learned how to exist without ambition, like his Black lesser than.

Since the late 50’s and early 60’s the momentum has changed hands in this struggle. Where in the past they always were focused on progress, now we as a people are fighting to preserve history as well.

Since we approach this conflict in a defensive manner, forward progress is inhibited by our desire to fight to preserve – instead of attack and take.

[...]

The brown hordes and their communist overlords have us on the defensive. We plan rallies around the idea we are preserving history, instead of planning marches through once white areas that are now inhabited by the brown plague. This is how we show solidarity for our future.

We are the most hated element of society. People flock to strength, not weakness. While we are not a weak people and Charlottesville is going to be wonderful for morale and our cause, it is at its core a defense of our people. We are conquerors. We always have been.

In our position we should agitate to make our position attainable. Go places we aren’t welcome. Large White marches through areas now populated by Muslims, public pro-White demonstrations and a very vocal position on all social matters pertaining to race. This is our fucking country. We have been charged with the task of taking back what is rightfully ours for the sake of our children and future generations.

Defending won’t always be enough. Especially when literally everyone is coming for part of what was created for you.

How do some in these circles say it? Retake Everything.

Show post
Larry Ridgeway #racist identitydixie.com

[From "Bull Connor: History’s Unsung Hero"]

Looking back on my childhood, I remember the names of men put forth as men that were worthy of looking up to. I remember the story of how Lincoln freed the blacks and how Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act and was told that these men were heroes for their heroic deeds. Upon further examination though, it is not these men that are heroes, it is the men who stood against them that are the real heroes. Men who stood up against the tide of, not only federal overreach, but the breach in contract with the laws of nature – blacks are lesser thans and, if anything, should be subjugated. When opposition to the “muh Civil Rights” movement comes to mind, one can think of none other than Bull Connor.

[...]

In 1934, he entered and won the race for a seat on the Alabama House of Representatives on the Democratic ticket. During his term as a legislator he opposed increasing the state sales tax and increasing licensing fees, while voting to raised the poll tax (a measure to keep poor whites and blacks from voting. Hallelujiah).

[...]

During his time in this position, he did many things I consider to be badass (to say the least). In 1938, he ordered the attendees of the Southern Conference for Human Welfare at Municipal Auditorium not to “segregate together” causing a scene with the-then First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt (who was intensely disliked in the South at the time).

In 1948, his officers arrested a U.S senator from Idaho, Glen H. Taylor, who was running for Vice President on the Progressive ticket alongside Henry Wallace, for attempting to speak with the Southern Negro Youth Conference, thereby violating the city’s segregation laws. This is pretty fucking sweet if you ask me.

Also in 1948, he led a walkout at the Democratic National Convention by southern delegates in protest of Harry Truman’s civil rights policies. He also ran unsuccessfully for governor in 1950.

It gets better though. He hated commies. He is stated to have said, “There isn’t enough room in this town for Bull and the commies.” In 1950, he helped get an ordinance passed in the city making “communication or voluntarily association” with a communist party member a misdemeanor punishable by a 100 dollar fine and 180 days in jail. FUCK YEAHHHH! He also told those commie scum they had 48 hours to vacate the city (for real).

[...]

He came back in 1956 and was not fucking around. He organized a raid on that agitating scumbag Fred Shuttlesworth’s house during a “destroy the white mans country” meeting and arrested them for vagrancy, a crime you can be held without bail for the first three days of imprisonment. The federal government was all like, “Hey, were going to investigate.” Bull says “Fuck you.” As Bill The Butcher says, “That’s how you stand up against the rising of the tide.” Bill The Butcher also did nothing wrong.

Afterwards, he was elected as Democratic National Committeeman for Alabama in 1960.

In 1962, in an attempt to have the city portrayed in a better light on the national stage, the voters changed the form of government in the city by having the mayor work with a separate city council, instead of with two other city commissioners. This push was spearheaded by none other than Chamber of Commerce President (((William Smyers))) after he said he was in Japan and saw a picture of a bus in flames near Anniston, Alabama. He was just so traumatized that the white man was standing against integration and the destruction of their way of life.

Before leaving office, he held court with the agitators once more. In May of 1963, Martin Luther Coon was planning protests citywide, Bull was not having it. He ordered police to arrest and jail hundreds of violent black adults and children, let the dogs loose on them and employed the use of fire hoses to quell the disturbance brought about by those actively and openly disrupting the way of life of white southerners whose ancestors settled the land and made it prosperous.

When asked if he could maintain segregation in its current capacity in Birmingham, he responded, “I may not be able to, but I’ll die trying.”

The public outcry nationwide against the events in Birmingham led to the hastening of civil rights laws by our malevolent federal government. With the cucking of the entire country secured, the powers-that-be pushed through their legislation and court mandates ended commonsensical segregation in the South. A sad day indeed.

[...]

Bull Connor foresaw the problems we face today. He did all that he could to keep Birmingham free from these problems and in the end came up short. The fact he was never willing to cuck to the federal powers and was relentless in his pursuit of the preservation of the southern way of life should make him a hero to all.

For what is it about the American spirit that makes us different?

It’s the will to stand up and be defiant in the face of those who abuse their power. To seek the best life for your people as there is possible. He remained constant and consistent. Theophilus Eugene Connor was, is, and always will be a hero in my eyes.

BULL CONNOR DID NOTHING WRONG!