SSTDT Top 250!

Quote# 71305

My concern for level of pain of rape would be greater if it weren't for the fact that most American women deserve to raped because they oppose prostitution as a sexual outlet for men. Since they deserve to raped, I cannot concern myself with the pain rape causes them.

fschmidt, love-shy.com 246 Comments [3/4/2010 12:31:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 536
Submitted By: David

Quote# 80934

(Part of a much larger post)

Women do not "love" men ... women do not "love" their parents ... women do not "love" each other ... women do not even "love" their own children ... actually, women are totally INCAPABLE of "love". Even the ancients knew and wrote extensively about this unspoken truth. They are creatures whose sole purpose is self-preservation. Like the shark, they have small brains, no higher self/consciousness, no shred of humanity, and yet are masters of survival and have no enemies other than themselves.

Only men are capable of this concept we call "love" and this is a fact, when was the last time you heard of a woman jumping in front of someone to take a bullet for them?

Exactly.

Women think ONLY of themselves 24 hours a day 7 days a week in a rather narcissistic manner, and this mindset is NOT conducive to chemical reactions such as "love".

So guys, don't feel bad if women do not "appreciate" your "kindness", "love", or "personality" ... you are just dealing with a creature whose walnut-sized brain simply CANNOT process or reciprocate any of the things I just mentioned. That is all. The creature does not mean to "hurt" your feelings, what's happening is that your "kindness" simply does not register with it's ancient reptilian brain. It's nothing "personal" really.

In short ... It's not you, it's them

trogdor005, Men Going Their Own Way 311 Comments [5/1/2011 12:46:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 391
Submitted By: Silver Eyed Rigaldo

Quote# 81990

But, as the post title implies, the Edmonton Slutwalk girls have gone a step further. They are explicitly passing themselves off as sluts. This is fortunate, as it means that now we can start bringing the legal and moral force of society to bear upon them. To re-iterate:
Every woman marching in the Edmonton Slut Walk is publicly declaring herself a slut. This means every woman there desires sex with any and all partners. Any sexual activity you initiate with them comes with implied consent. They cannot say no, and if they do understand all their 'no's mean yes. They are all asking for it. They want it bad. Now. From you. Go get 'em!


Now if you disagree, if you think that's not what this is about at all, then two things come to mind:

1. If a bunch of women stand on the street claiming that they are shoe shiners, and they refuse to shine your shoes, you not only have a false advertising charge you can lay on them, but also discriminatory business practices. Women claiming to be nymphomaniacs who can't get enough may just find themselves having to explain why they are so prudish.
2. By their own admission, they are lying bitches. The worst kind of woman. All marching on the street. Together.


If your wife is one of them, I'm very very sorry. Maybe a good rape might make her a little more manageable around the house.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child, The Third Edge of the Sword 165 Comments [6/16/2011 3:49:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 387
Submitted By: David

Quote# 109504

Q: At what age should a harlot start to be corrected? Is a harlot ever too young to rape?

A: As soon as she’s old enough to be a harlot, you should start correcting her. 9 – 15 is usually the ideal age to start correcting harlots, but no harlot is too young to correct. These days, harlots are getting younger and younger. So, if you see a 6-year-old dressed like a harlot, feel free to rape her. Remember: all harlots are equally deserving of rape.

The Philosophers of Rape, The Philosophy of Rape 142 Comments [6/11/2015 2:09:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 300

Quote# 71770

A penis is a fucking weapon… and I AM a mother of 3 sons! My youngest is 5 and I can tell you, I never allow the older teen boys to bathe him, sleep in the same bed with him, see him naked, sit on their laps, babysit, wrestle or any interaction that involve more than a hug. Do I think my older sons will rape him? In my heart no ,but in my mind I know it can happen because they have a fucking penis and a penis is a weapon. Might sound harsh to some but my job is to protect my kids even from each other. I was the same way when the older boys were younger… no staying over friends house were there are older boys or men. No staying over my brother’s house( my brother loves them and in my heart I know he would not hurt them, but he also has a penis which is a fucking weapon. Only female doctors. Never fully trust any man with a penis. Not their father, uncles, teachers … no one.

I cannot even fathom how vigilant I would have been if my children were females.

Rose, aroomofourown 208 Comments [3/30/2010 3:51:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 289

Quote# 84101

I don't believe I could recommend this as a strategy for most men, but it is surely educational to learn that raping and killing a woman is demonstrably more attractive to women than behaving like a gentleman. And women, before all the inevitable snowflaking commences, please note that there is absolutely nothing to argue about here. It is an established empirical fact.

I would go so far to argue that if you are being introduced to a woman you find attractive, she will be more attracted to you if you slap her in the face without warning and walk away without explanation than if you smile and tell her that you are very pleased to meet her. Now this, being a mere hypothesis, can be argued. And tested, if you're feeling especially scientific this weekend.

[Emphasis added]

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 202 Comments [10/3/2011 3:02:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 284
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 70784

The very first human intercourse was a rape, women have a hymen. Every intercourse after that is still a "rape" because women still have hymens. Women are not supposed to be poked by men, they were all lesbians until one day a freak of nature was born and he got saddled with "God". All men are women first when they develop in the womb, they just have overgrown clits. Female ejaculation contains trace amounts of semen and that's how the ancient female reproductive system reproduced before men "raped" them.

In essence, all sex is rape. Am I going to complain? No, I have a gun to shoot down any "rapist" that enters my home.

Bricktop, AWE 124 Comments [2/19/2010 1:56:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 280
Submitted By: ixolite

Quote# 72877

really sad that womyn got to be this way, it was better a few decades ago... at this point I honestly think a husband needs to be legally allowed to hit his wife once in a while when she misbehaves, it's hard coded in womyn's DNA that a strong man worthy of respect will hit her and severely scold her whenever she tries messing with him, in the end they love their husband a lot more for it... they subconsciously want to be hit and be told to shut up... sad that feminists have screwed this up because it only means that womyn will do all kind of nasty shit that will go completely unchecked and they think they're entitled to it

this is what happens in every third world country, and marriages are really stable there, because the man is the true chief of the family and he is allowed to be a man... this is the un-politically correct truth

Mesian, love-shy.com 237 Comments [5/13/2010 1:51:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 278
Submitted By: David

Quote# 78607

My rape advocacy is twofold. Two aspects of feminism currently independently justify rape, in my view: 1. equality and 2. feminist corruption of justice. Feminist rape law reform has more than blurred the distinction between rape and consensual sex. In many circumstances it no longer matters in the eyes of the law whether we actually rape a woman or not -- she can regret sex in any case and have us convicted of "rape." The law quite explicitly states that mere negligence is enough to be a rapist even if you had no evil intentions. So why should men care if we rape or not? Women don't respect us anymore, so why should we respect women? Hate breeds hate. I have followed the deterioration of justice closely throughout my life, and my heart has been filled with deeper hatred at every step of feminist legal reform. False rape is now institutionalized. At this point, I don't believe Norwegian women are morally entitled to protection from rape.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge's Blog 208 Comments [1/12/2011 7:13:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 265
Submitted By: Honky McCracker

Quote# 72850

The first question any sane, self-loving woman would ask upon realizing that the vast majority of males are rapists is how to keep these rapists away from girls and women. The fact that so many women instead ask how to keep the males from being rapists is a manifestation of feminine masochism.

Margaret, A Room of Our Own 164 Comments [5/10/2010 8:51:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 248
Submitted By: Boy Wonder

Quote# 73179

As I predicted you like banging the rape drum. Yes, I know that rape is bad but you have to admit that there are a lot of worse things, like terminal disease, loss of a limb, or despair. I know it’s humiliating but when it’s over it’s over, not like cancer.

Yes, a Christian woman suffers less from rape than another woman. Are you asking me if I think rapists should go after Christian women? Well if they do they will be faced with the strength and will of the Lord and may even come to His side when they see how little their pathetic abuse can do to a woman of faith!

No you didn’t misunderstand about why rape is a sin. It makes no sense for it to be a sin for a man to rape his wife since a man can’t rape his wife. It’s just not logical, like stealing your own car or pocking your own pocket.

Maybe you got raped and enjoy harping on it. Well the whole world doesn’t revolve around you. Get over it, clear your head and come to God. [Emphasis added]

Censored One, IAmAnAtheist 130 Comments [5/25/2010 9:50:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 242
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 80416

First, there is no such thing as marital rape. Once consent is formally given in public ceremony, it cannot be revoked; the form in which marital consent is revoked is well-established. It is called divorce. This isn't a religious issue, although many on both sides will attempt to view it that way, it's a simple matter of when consent is revocable and the specific form that revocation must take. I invite those who believe that consent may always be granted and revoked at will to consent to join the U.S. Army, then attempt to withdraw their consent. That should serve to clarify the matter for them; one hopes they will enjoy their extended holiday in Afghanistan. The attempt to create a legal concept of "marital rape" is no less than an attempt to destroy the basic concept of marriage. If the husband or the wife has no more claim to the spouse's body than anyone else, then the marital vows are meaningless and the marriage is a charade. Once consent is withdrawn, the marriage has ended.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 140 Comments [4/3/2011 6:17:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 231

Quote# 64100

If a law forces rapists to marry their victims, then perhaps the number of rapes will decline to near zero. What’s more, if the law requires rapists to pay fifty shekels of silver to the father, this could indeed equate to the death penalty if the rapist hasn’t saved toward his bride’s future. Thus, we have narrowed down the field of rapists who marry their victims to only those who have saved for their “brides” future. If the girl happens to be ugly, he is required to marry her anyway. Again, this stipulation will help narrow the field further since potential rapists will be motivated to think before acting. Thirdly, if one “selects” his wife through means of rape, then he’ll never be able to divorce her even if “she” turns out to be a transvestite. The law is putting so many roadblocks into the potential rapist’s path, and causing him to think, I would guess most potential rapists would opt for the easier path of waiting for a willing partner. Thus, such a society could easily exceed the American society in quality by many fold.

[Bold mine]

Alan Clarke, Debunking Christianity  185 Comments [7/16/2009 10:57:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 221
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 74451

And what is that difference? Interestingly I'm actually discussing rape with another new poster as well. . . since the difference between rape and domination is 'consent', what gives consent? Attraction, just with animals and their mating rituals of sexual display - if you are attractive, good sperm, then it's not rape.

e_i-2, love-shy.com 184 Comments [7/13/2010 6:36:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 219
Submitted By: Letipex

Quote# 92007

About the gang-rape of a 23 year old woman in India

"The spiritual leader’s remarks could be paraphrased thus: Those who were at fault were drunk. Had she taken guru diksha and chanted the Saraswati Mantra, she would not have boarded any random bus after watching a movie with her boyfriend. Even if she did, she should have taken God’s name and asked for mercy.

She should have called them brothers, fallen at their feet and pleaded for mercy. Had she said, “I am a weak woman, you are my brothers”, such brutality would not have happened.

The self-proclaimed godman also said he was against harsher punishments for rape accused as such laws could be misused."

Asaram Bapu, The Hindu 49 Comments [1/11/2013 4:02:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 204
Submitted By: erlando

Quote# 64976

Forcing a wife to have sex is not rape as her body already belongs to her husband.

nick, Y!A 144 Comments [8/19/2009 5:23:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 197

Quote# 73126

Rape is equality

When men have something women have less of, such as money or power, women simply take it by force. It's called affirmative action and feminists believe it's right. I am not going to argue against that. I accept that as a lost cause. So instead I am going to embrace forced equality and demand it for men as well.

What women have that men don't is of course sex. If anyone doubts that sex is a female resource, go here and request the PDF file Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363.

In light of feminism, or if you believe in equality, this article makes such a compelling case for rape that Baumeister felt obliged to include the otiose disclaimer, "Our analysis should in no way be construed as excusing sexual coercion and we roundly condemn any such acts."

So let us give women equality if that's what they really want. Remember that due to the hypergamous nature of women, men get less sex as women get more money and power. Women are generally incapable of feeling attraction for men who are not better than they are, and soon men are no better than equal. So it is about time men in feminist countries such as Norway stop thinking of rape as wrong. I have previously argued this point e.g. here as Arpagus, and no one has been able to justify why affirmative action is right when it benefits women and hurts men but is wrong when it helps men and hurts women.

Arpagus, Eivind Berge's Blog  244 Comments [5/24/2010 7:24:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 192
Submitted By: acooper

Quote# 70160

Considering the hell men have to go through in the feminised world today where everything is skewed to favour women in all areas of life, but especially in the dating scene, then the new system would have to be one which would quickly and swiftly reverse the damage done to our societies by the incessant terrorism of men by feminism and it's policies propped p by governments and institutions. So I'd propose of system of male choice in the dating game. All I'd recommend is one law and one law only with regards to male-female relationships. No matter what a man says to or asks of a woman, a woman cannot say no. A no from a woman could be reported as easily to the Police as a current day rape, and would also be punishable by a jail sentence.

Call me a misogynist, or call me angry from perceived mistreatment of ordinary men under the hammer of feminism, but it's the only way for society to make up for years of torment and give ordinary men not only the chance to date a woman without the fear of ever hearing a no, but also the chance to date out of their league and the chance to produce better-looking offspring.

A woman saying no to a man under the new system could be classed as equivalent to raping the man. You may think this is misoginist and harsh, but wake up guys, ugly men are going to prison daily in feminised countries for even looking at women, when the women will claim is that she was raped, only in actual fact to only be looked at by the wrong type of guy for her in the wrong way.

The only system that would work is one where the dating minefield would be pushed to the female side of the battleground.

Coby, love-shy.com 203 Comments [2/18/2010 3:38:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 191
Submitted By: David

Quote# 71363

[After all, there are a lot studies about the rapist striving for the humiliation of the victim and demonstrating his or her power over the victim.]

This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists.


fschmidt, love-shy.com 126 Comments [3/6/2010 2:08:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 190
Submitted By: David

Quote# 93114

Captain Beagle: Which is worse, work or rape? I know 2 women who were raped. Go fuck yourself #sorrynicepplhadtohearthat

VD: Hey, talk to @johnscalzi not me. I certainly didn't rape them.

Captain Beagle: no your article suggested an increase in rapes was less harmful than women handing out resumes. Insensitive & absurd

VD: I didn't suggest it, I proved it. By what metric do you claim that rape is more harmful to society than women working?

Captain Beagle: I was unaware one needed statistical data to prove rape is harmful.

VD: You need something, at any rate. What is your basis for claiming rape is worse for society than female employment?

Captain Beagle: thanx for this fascinating study in hyperbolic misogyny. I'm thinking of using you as the template for my next villain.

Vox Day, Vox Populi 77 Comments [3/14/2013 3:46:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 178

Quote# 70215

Rape is a complete and total fabrication. It never happens. There's no such thing as bad sex. There's bad people, but not bad sex.. I don't see how pounding someone in the ass when they don't want to have it can be seen as so horrible, but meanwhile these same people kill babies and leave their husbands on the drop of a dime.

Demonman, Argue With Everyone 77 Comments [2/10/2010 6:11:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 173
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 79126

Congresscunt Giffords will probably survive being shot in the head, according to medical reports currently available. She will likely suffer some life long brain damage from the injury to her brain, but when the victim is a leftist feminist female, how can you tell? Her husband is a NASA astronaut. She should have been home taking care of her husband's house and family instead of risking her life promoting radical socialist causes and amnesty for illegal aliens. The proper place for females is in the private sphere of house, home, and family. The proper place for females is not in the public sphere of politics. If she lives, the Governor of Arizona will not be able to appoint a man to replace her in Congress. Another tragedy. Maybe she will retire.

Bob Allen, The World According to Bob 101 Comments [1/31/2011 4:42:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 172
Submitted By: JohnTheAtheist

Quote# 89899

I can't go so far as to support rape, I still think it's wrong and should be punished, but I like that women need to live in fear of rape. I like that I have found an issue that the mere mention of can reduce most Feminists to tears. If you want to cause pain to a woman, make a joke about rape. I will be sure to do this more in my own life.

In some spats I had with females during the years, I wonder if they mistakingly took my belligerent attitude as being a threat of rape, which I didn't intend, as opposed to just the threat of violence, which was the effect I was going for.

In conclusion: rape is funny

Otis, Anti-Womens Coalition 83 Comments [11/4/2012 5:00:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 170

Quote# 84582

I recently took a long trip for work and spent a lot of hours in the air. One of my fellow passengers really stood out in my mind: a 20-something lass a few rows ahead of me. She is a natural-born beauty in that “launch a thousand ships” kind of way – slim, near-perfect symmetrical features, piercing blue eyes, and a shapely body. She is, simply, stunning. But there’s more to this story than a retired soldier admiring an exquisite example of female flesh young enough to be my daughter.

It was actually her tattoo that first caught my attention.

She was wearing a low-slung top that revealed a HUGE eagle inked across her chest and extending down under the front of her shirt. And then I noticed her hair – what little there was of it. I’ve always kept my hair short, even by military standards, and her hair was shorter than mine. Few things de-feminize a woman more than buzzing off her hair, which is why it is considered to be shameful in many societies. She was wearing ratty, ripped jeans and far too much costume jewelry. And then I noticed the piercings. As I stood six inches behind her for several minutes waiting to de-plane I counted seven, and that was just what was visible. I wondered what else she had done to herself. A tramp-stamp is a given, but who knows what other “body art” was hidden out of my view[...]

I asked myself what would cause the stunningly-beautiful young woman on my flight – at the height of her Sexual Market Value – to do that to herself? Women dress for us, so what does she intend for us to infer? I’m easy? I’m rebellious? I can drink you under the table?

I can think of no message that her chosen facade would convey that would be in her long-term interest. In a few years after her looks fade she is likely to be just another tatted-up skank wondering where the good men are.

It didn’t have to be this way. In a different social environment a woman like her would have learned to be (gasp!) feminine. She would have observed the older women in her surroundings and absorbed benevolent patriarchy in the air she grew up breathing. With her beauty she could have married above her economic station and lived a comfortable life. We can’t know if she would have been happy, but she almost certainly would have had stability, security and comfort. But she doesn’t live in that society; she lives in a “Slut Walk” society, thanks to feminism. When she chose the “Suicide Girl” look nobody stopped her. Now she has mutilated herself with enough ink and metal trinkets to repel the kind of man most likely to give her the life she wants, because no matter what she does to the outside of her body, she will eventually want what women have always wanted on the inside – stability, security and comfort.

The fruits of feminism: what a waste.

Lyn87, The Spearhead 146 Comments [11/6/2011 4:04:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 169

Quote# 84669

She Obeys Without Reference to Her Feelings About the Will of God

The Scriptures say a woman must ignore her “feelings” about the will of God, and do what her husband says. She is to obey her husband as if he were God Himself. She can be as certain of God’s will, when her husband speaks, as if God had spoken audibly from Heaven!

[...]

What If a Husband Expressly Commands Something Explicitly Wrong?

When women ask me this question, I counter with two of my own:

1) “Have you been living in daily obedience to your husband as part of your wholehearted, loving submission to God?”

(This is an essential part of the problem. If a woman has not been submissive, God has no responsibility for her situation and cannot be blamed if her husband requires something wrong.)

2) “Has your husband ever actually commanded you to do something wrong?”

In the hundreds of times I have asked these questions, not once, if my memory is right, has a woman answered, “Yes, I am always obedient, and yet my husband has required me to break one of God’s laws.”

Never! Why?

Because, when a woman takes God at His word, submits to her husband without reservation, fears God and loves Him, then God takes upon Himself the responsibility to see that a woman does not have to sin!

[...]

Don’t I Have Any Rights?

Can you find a Kleenex somewhere and mop up the tears, just for a minute, long enough to talk to me about what your rights really are?

You don’t have any rights, no rights at all. You lost them on the day you rebelled against God. You lost them, not because you are a woman, but because you are a sinner, just as I am.

Elizabeth Rice Handford, No Longer Quivering 81 Comments [11/5/2011 8:58:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 168

Quote# 86356

The “broken windows” theory of crime:

The basic insight of the “broken windows” theory is that serious crime is kept low when petty crime such as vandalism is kept down. Lesser crimes leave the way open for greater crimes. At least that is my reading of it.

How does this remind me of handling a wife? Like this. As a husband, I have found that arguing with my wife about her “lesser crimes” seems to prevent worse “crimes”. I think women are - ”given an inch” – inclined to “take an ell”. That is, they will behave about as badly as you allow them to. If you argue with the missus about how long her skirts should be, you will not be arguing with her about whether she should wear skirts in the first place. If you are like me, and you prefer your wife not to wear pants (trousers), this is a better argument to have than one about skirts vs pants.

Likewise, if you remonstrate with her about the quality of her meals, you will not be arguing about whether she should cook at all.

Or if you complain that something she wears out looks tarty, you will not be arguing about whether she should flirt or not. Or, more seriously, if you argue and complain about her flirting, you are less likely to find yourself arguing about whether you should have an “open marriage”.

So, punish and deal with the minor crimes, to prevent the major crimes. Deal with broken windows, lest you have to deal with arson.

A wife will test the boundaries. Set them narrow. Don’t let her do outrageous things without any complaint from you, because she will eventually test you and go too far, and then it will be too late.

The same applies to children.

If you are a husband who wants to be an effective head of the house, this is something to keep in mind.

David Collard, Social Biology 84 Comments [3/8/2012 4:40:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 166

Quote# 80197

What Has Feminism Really Done To Us?

God presents Himself in Scripture as male. He wants us to know Him in this way. He sent His SON (not daughter) to die for us. The intent of the Feminists is obvious. They wish first to destroy gender difference in our human relations and then to feminize the very nature of how God presents Himself to our sense.

But other areas are as important:

To maintain sanity, we need to return language to common usage.

We have policemen and policewomen. Policewoman implies, by her physical weakness up against a man, that she is physically less. If there is a burglar in your house, you don’t want to hear the dispatcher say “we’re sending the policewoman right out”!

We have pilots and pilotesses. If the plane is in trouble and the hydraulic system is out (which will require massive male strength to get the plan down), you don’t want to hear “this is the pilotess speaking, and I can’t control, with my limited upper body strength, this plane any longer”!!!

If you’re on the roof of a burning building, you don’t want to hear the little voice of a firewoman holler “jump, I’ll catch you”!

Walter Schneider, Fathers For Life 120 Comments [3/24/2011 8:15:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 162
Submitted By: WickedWitch

Quote# 87762

How does throwing acid in their faces when they demand independence from men benefit women?

Because female independence is strongly correlated with a whole host of social ills. Using the utilitarian metric favored by most atheists, a few acid-burned faces is a small price to pay for lasting marriages, stable families, legitimate children, low levels of debt, strong currencies, affordable housing, homogenous populations, low levels of crime, and demographic stability.

How do honor killings benefit women?

Because female promiscuity and divorce are strongly correlated with a whole host of social ills, from low birth and marriage rates to high levels of illegitimacy.


Vox Day, Vox Popoli 104 Comments [6/11/2012 3:35:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 160

Quote# 84872

The stay-at-home-daughters movement, which is promoted by Vision Forum, encourages young girls and single women to forgo college and outside employment in favor of training as “keepers at home” until they marry. Young women pursuing their own ambitions and goals are viewed as selfish and antifamily; marriage is not a choice or one piece of a larger life plan, but the ultimate goal. Stay-at-home daughters spend their days learning “advanced homemaking” skills, such as cooking and sewing, and other skills that at one time were a necessity -- knitting, crocheting, soap- and candle-making. A father is considered his daughter’s authority until he transfers control to her husband.

Doug Phillips, Vision Forum 100 Comments [11/21/2011 4:15:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 158
Submitted By: PK

Quote# 85149

Taking a belt to his daughter’s rear isn’t criminal, it isn’t anti-biblical, and it shouldn’t be condemned. If the wife stepped out of line he should be free to have her bend over and take a few whacks on the ass as well. A lot of times women get out of line and even the so-called “adult” women are often just children in adult bodies, they sometimes need discipline. For the most part they seem to crave it, they act in a fashion that they know SHOULD provoke a physical response from a healthy/sane male and then when that response doesn’t occur they get upset and begin pushing more and more to see what they can get away with.

If your wife spends more money than you told her she was allowed to spend, she is basically testing you, she is begging you to get tough with her, lay down the law, and be a man. Women won’t, don’t, and probably cannot respect a pushover man, they want a take charge man. Steinem once remarked, “we are becoming the men we wanted to marry” maybe so, but men are becoming the women of old and that doesn’t appeal to women, modern women or women at any other time. If your wife steps out of line and spends more than you told her she could spend, you have her bend over the table and take her belting/paddling like a big girl. Maybe for a lot of women it wouldn’t even be a negative thing.

What does modern society expect us to do, roll over and apologize that the woman was acting unruly and out of line? I say you paddle her ass and see where things go from there (more likely than not she’ll beg you to mount her right then and there).

Bryan, The Spearhead 101 Comments [12/10/2011 6:13:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 157

Quote# 89104

Slapping a girl across the face isn’t just about hurting her, it’s a kind of neg. It says, “I can crush you like an insect, but you aren’t worth the effort.” It’s a tacit acknowledgment that she’s weaker than you, beneath you, and if she crosses you again, you’ll put her in the hospital. You treat her like she’s a child throwing a temper tantrum, not an equal.

Like I said already, you should NOT hit women, not unless you want to end up in jail. But the principle still stands. Women should be terrorized by their men; it’s the only thing that makes them behave better than chimps.

Ferdinand Bardamu, Manosphere Copies 100 Comments [8/21/2012 3:45:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 156

Quote# 85150

These verses [1 Corinthians 7] show clearly that there is an obligation to have sex, never a right to not have sex. This is where the old term, the “marriage debt” comes from. It is a debt owed by both parties to the other. And withholding of sex is defrauding the partner. This is not regarded by the Church traditionally as a small matter, or unimportant. Rather if a wife defrauds her husband by not submitting and giving him sex when he desires it, she has committed a mortal sin.

For those not familiar with the term, a mortal sin is a grave offense not only against the marriage partner, but against God Himself. And, without confessing the sin, doing penance, and agreeing that it will not happen again, the woman will lose her soul and be consigned to hell.

So, we see how serious the sex obligation is for both husband and wife. These are debts and obligations agreed to and taken upon each other by the vows of marriage. The idea of marital rape is asinine and ridiculous. It only shows how far we have gotten from a real conception of marriage.

The woman has not power over her body, but her husband. Where is the wiggle room for marital rape here? There is none whatsoever. The very development of this anti-Christian concept shows that we must remove the State from marriage and restore true marriage with its vows and obligations – otherwise there is no marriage at all, only a farce masquerading under the false name of “marriage” to deceive men into its clutches.

Peter, The Spearhead 94 Comments [12/10/2011 6:13:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 154

Quote# 81647

[On why young girls should dress modestly]

For example,
I knew of a man, his wife recently died. He had never touched anyone but his wife, sexually. Never ever thought of a child. But there was a neighbor who allowed her little girls to hang around the man. They wore tank tops and shorts. The old man asked if the girls could clean for him. He offered to pay them. They came over once or twice a week. Within a month into this, he started 'touching' them.
..Fortunately, the girls told their mother very soon and it didn't go any further, but the old man had never done it before, nor did he ever do it again.

The man became tempted by them, their vulnerability, their skin.


Rhomphaia (Sword) , queenqueequeg 91 Comments [6/1/2011 4:05:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 154
Submitted By: AtroposHeart

Quote# 81249

If all this is true, what are these women protesting? As I said, they are frightened. There is such a thing as rape, and they cannot process that reality. They have no way of understanding or making sense of it – and so they protest against it, hoping that outrage alone will make it go away. They want a world in which rape does not occur. Such a thing is not possible. However, there is a way to gain safety. A woman can protect herself against rape not by staging protests, especially protests defending sluttiness, but by earning the protection of good men. Men protect women against men. The sensible woman’s path in a dangerous world is to earn the protection of good men.

Laura, The Thinking Housewife 114 Comments [5/13/2011 3:48:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 154
Submitted By: Silver Eyed Rigaldo

Quote# 65201

[Concerning a bill in the Bahamas to outlaw marital rape]

"It is ridiculous for them to try to make that a law, because I don't think a man can rape his own wife. After two people get married, the Bible says that they become one – one flesh. How is it possible to rape what is yours?"


"Even if a woman says no to her husband it still can't be considered rape because she is his wife. He already paid his dues at the church and she already said 'I do,' so from then on, even if [a man] forces sex on his wife, it isn’t rape"

Pemmie Sutherland and Elvis Russell, The Bahama Journal 68 Comments [9/1/2009 9:58:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 153
Submitted By: Comhradh

Quote# 88543

These are merely five of the many semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years. I listed them in the order in which I admired their courage and actions - meaning, that they are from greatest to least. But, that is not to say that I don’t admire them all. I respect all of these women for their courage, strength, resolve, and willingness to do what is just.

#1 – Sandra Crockett (1997)
In 1997, Sandra Crockett had her mentally handicapped son, who was 21 at the time, castrated in order to curb his sexual impulses and aggression. She feared that he would be taken away from her because of this, and she did not want him to be placed in a mental institution. Likewise, she said that he had been feeling some pain in his testicles. This one was originally number three on my list, but I loved this woman’s story so much, that I moved it up to number one. I greatly admire her, and I think she is a loving, kind hero. She did what she thought was best for her son, and it benefitted them both in the end. I believe that more women should, in terms of the practicality of the modern world, follow her example.

#2 – Anjana Maity (2009)
In 2009, forty-two year old Anjana Maity castrated her 13 year old son and then beheaded him. Interestingly enough, this act of release against the boy was committed after the woman’s husband, Ranjit Maity, left their family. He had had an affair, and he had threatened to set her and her son on fire if they did not leave him alone. The child was clearly suffering, as was she, and this should be considered an act of mercy on her behalf. So, regardless of whether she was arrested or not, she did the right thing.

#3 – Catherine Kieu Becker (2011)
In 2011, forty-eight year old Catherine Kieu Becker cut off her husband’s penis with a ten-inch kitchen knife. No act such as this is committed if the other party is undeserving. And, given that her husband was a man, who had attempted to abandon her, I would say that he did, indeed, deserve it. Mrs. Becker is a hero for seeking retribution for the misery she had been caused by her husband. Regardless of whether or not she was arrested, she is a champion, and I admire her courage.

#4 – Joyce Maxine Gregory (2012)
In 2012, thirty-five year old Joyce Maxine Gregory fought back against her boyfriend, or ex-boyfriend, after he went on a rampage through their home. During the struggle that followed afterwards, she grabbed his testicles, causing the scrotum to split open. And, while he may have recovered afterwards, meaning she didn’t quite finish the job, I still admire her for her bravery. It takes a lot to stand up against someone who is physically larger than you, especially when they have lost control of their senses. I salute her.

#5 – Chalie Simon (2009)
In 2009, nineteen year old Chalie Simon grabbed her boyfriend by the testicles and squeezed hard as he attempted to forcefully push her from his residence. Her actions came from his neglect for her feelings, and his neglect of providing the simple attention that she asked him for. It was justified, and regardless of whether or not she was arrested, I salute her for standing up against someone who mistreated her for loving them.

________________________________
That is my list for now - five of the greatest, semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years and or decades. I salute them all, I admire them all, and I hope that I, too, can be as brave when standing up against those who wish to do me harm.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 86 Comments [7/26/2012 3:40:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 121

Quote# 88952

The New World: The Rebirth, Castration Day, Breeders and More

I have written about this multiple times in the past, but due to the fact that I have numerous articles, it appears that people are not able to find every bit of information that I have provided, so I will detail it here.

1) Castration Day: The purpose of this day is to pacify males for further processing, meaning, in the end, the majority of them would eventually be terminated, and this holiday would no longer be entirely relevant at a certain point – the day of the True Rebirth, and the dawn of The New World. It is merely a major point in the short-term solutions for the pacification and so forth of all males.

2) The population of males world-wide for the indefinite future after the implementation of the short-term solutions would be around 10%, for the purposes of practicality. The 10% that remained would be used for the sole purpose of breeding, and nothing more. They would be given enough sustenance and so forth to remain alive, while being held in captivity to keep them from posing a threat to the general population outside (women). They would be allowed visitation by their closest female guardian(s) and or relatives if their closest female guardian(s) or relatives wishes to see them.

3) All males, regardless of age, would be eligible (with the consent of their closest female guardian) for castration. However, their closest female guardian (CFG) would be advised to exempt them from castration and sign them up as a future Breeder (someone used for sample-collection) on the basis of supply-and-demand. If the supply was well enough for the foreseeable future, the CFG would likely be advised to go ahead and have the male castrated, and in The New World, the CFG would likely comply with this. There would be no moral qualm about such an issue, because it would be based entirely on practicality and common knowledge (men need to be castrated to keep women safe) – there would be no emotional attachment to such a process. It would be seen as creating civility in the individual male, not as an act of harm.

4) The purpose of Castration Day is not to shame men, but to liberate all people and to civilize men. Nothing more, and nothing less. It is the only way.

5) Until science could be used to create genetically strong female progeny from two female parents (The Rebirth), the world population of males would remain around 10%. Once science was able to complete such a process (The Rebirth), the world-wide population of men would be held at around 1%, just in case. Any males who were born after this would be either disposed of or kept based entirely upon foreseeable practicality and potential for genetic efficiency. No emotional attachment would dictate otherwise, and if it did, the woman with said attachment would be reformed.

6) Some point out the issue of genetic deficiency due to lack of diversity, and a potential for inbreeding. In The New World, however, this would be a non-issue… Genetics would remain strong due to population. Say, for instance, the world-wide population in The New World is 7 billion, and 10% of that population is male, that would mean that there would be 700 million males world-wide. A sustainable population. If you multiply 6,300,000,000 (the number of females) by 700,000,000 (the number of males), you get 4,410,000,000,000,000,000 possibilities for the genetic makeup of future offspring. The population by the time The New World comes will be much larger than 7 billion, meaning that the possibilities will be even greater in number than this. Inbreeding and weakness of DNA will not be an issue.

7) By the time males are old enough to provide sperm samples, at the consent of their CFG, they will be screened for specific traits prior to Castration Day to see if they are viable Breeders. This screening will determine whether or not they are the most suitable contributors genetically. Characteristics will include testing physical symmetry, age-height-weight ratio, mental health, and parasite resistance, or the strength of their immune system. It is based entirely on practicality and efficiency, and nothing more. This would be done until The Rebirth (the day when science has its breakthrough in creating female progeny from two female parents and the male population is reduced to 1% world-wide via termination).

8) Post-Rebirth, Castration Day will be reduced to a smaller set of local screenings and procedures in each city world-wide, they will be uniform and set in stone, and the process will no longer be a celebration by all people, but a way of life for any male. Testing and screening for potential genetic contribution will happen at a male’s birth, and will be more lenient at that time, looking only for typical symmetry and a decent healthiness. This process will then be repeated when the male reaches the age to provide samples (maturity). If a male is born and appears to be weak, it will be disposed of. If a male is sufficient, it will be allowed to reach the age of “maturity”. It will then be screened again, for the aforementioned traits which will be determined by then, and if it is still sufficient, it will be kept as a Breeder. If it is not, it will be terminated. If the amount of males in relation to Post-Rebirth supply-and-demand is sufficient, all newborn males will be terminated based on the age and assumed longevity of the currently existing males, unless the particular male appears to be exceptionally healthy and strong.

It is as simple as that.

Thank you for reading.

Sincerely,
Femitheist

*Footnote: Breeders and all of the samples that they give would be identified with a set of numbers unique to them as an individual. These numbers would essentially be their name and or identity. Any woman who collects a sample will have her own ID in the system marked with said Breeder-number, and so shall her children's Birth Certificates and IDs be marked with the same Breeder-number. That way, if her children were to return some day to take a sample, they would not (on the off-chance it might occur) be given a sample from the same Breeder that their mother took from. This would be done to avoid any possibility of inbreeding. Sample-collection, retrieval and artificial insemination centers would be dispersed all across the world at local areas, as Breeders too would be dispersed all across the world, in numbers sufficient to the specific area.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 72 Comments [8/13/2012 3:47:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 111

Quote# 90508

These are things that will occur as is only possible through the creation of The New World, Post-Rebirth, as defined here.
.
.
.
-:New World Introductions:

•Global crime reduction of 95% (with a 5% exception for mentally ill individuals and femyles who have yet to be fully reformed).
•End of all war perpetually.
•Removal of all males within the guidelines of the Sufficient Genetic Standards and or Population Percentage Requirement (1-10% Globally Male).
•Removal of all femyles which are nonconvertible/unconformable (Pater-Fixation ~ incurable obsession with males ~ Mental Illness).
•Containment of all individuals with incurable disease(s) up until the time a cure for said disease(s) has been found.
•Removal of all incurably mentally-ill individuals, as defined by the Global Health Departments (GHD) standards.
•Removal of incurable femyle gender traitors and ALL male gender traitors. Regardless of the circumstances.
•Introduction of a One-World Government and a One-World Ruler (Queen), with subsidiary rulers for each nation, state, province, county, city and so forth.
•Removal of all civilian firearms due to a lack of necessity, and for public safety (avoidance of accidents).
•Universal health care with 100% coverage for all.
•Population control based on supply-and-demand for newer life. Sustainable population.
•Abolition and or destruction of all Non-Womyn (God as the Womyn) oriented religions and religious texts.

-:The Five Tenets/Doctrines of Femitheism

•The individual as well as the collective are equally important. All things must be done for the betterment of oneself and for the betterment of society as a whole. Self-improvement and all attempts to improve ones own life are seen as an act done for the greater good of all womyn.
•Each womyn is her own God, and equally the God of all others. Mutual respect among and between all womyn as well as the utmost respect for oneself is necessary for a functioning society.
•The removal of males, the incurably mentally-ill, and femyle gender traitors which cannot be reformed was, is, and forever will be a necessary function of life, bred from the desire to further produce prosperity, peace, health and general humyn enhancement.
•All laws which are set in place are for the greater good of all womyn. The intention and or nature of all of the laws which exist and or are created should not be questioned, as it is understood that these laws are the essence of justice.
•These Tenets/Doctrines must be the simple, central focus of each womyn's life. They must never be disregarded, questioned or broken.

Femitheist Divine, Femitheist Reborn 82 Comments [11/5/2012 4:53:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 102

Quote# 88788

Gender-based Abortion - Abort the Males

Gender-based abortion continues to exist for females all around the world. This female gendercide is based on the notion that females are innately inferior, or socially unworthy and or lacking of the potential for profitable intake.

The abortion of females based on gender all around the world, and even in America, effectively exemplifies the fact that many women are still indoctrinated, and many men are still pushing misogynistic agendas, both politically and culturally. These things must end if we are ever to achieve True Equality.

Now, the U.S. House has rejected a bill which would preclude gender-based abortion if doctors were to come across information regarding the person’s intent for the abortion. And, while I am pro-choice, I feel that the purpose of this bill was slightly misguided. It should be revised and legalized, and I will explain the reasoning for this.

The bill should be revised to include only abortions against female fetuses. Meaning, anyone who seeks an abortion because the gender of their fetus is female should be barred from having said abortion, and perhaps even criminally punished, depending on which half of the party came to this conclusion, assuming there are two present halves, for said desire. And, any doctor who performs an abortion for someone who wishes to dispose of a fetus due to the gender being female should receive criminal punishment.

On the other hand, anyone who desires to abort a fetus based on the gender because the fetus is male should be excluded from the bill entirely. This should be allowed. It is justified because women have proven to be the most profitable sex. They outperform men academically and in the workplace, and this is a trend which will continue to rise. Likewise, women are the greater minority when it comes to the committing of violent acts and crime.

[...]

Men, for many centuries, feared the education of women, and even stated that women were incapable of being educated, saying that they were “creatures of emotion without the ability to reason”. If this were the case, however, they would have at least tried to educate women to see if they had a potential for reasoning. They didn’t do this, because they feared that very potential. They knew all along that women could surpass them if they were given the opportunity, and they oppressed women for this very reason.

And, when women finally did achieve these opportunities, thanks to Patriarchal Manipulation for fear of a true awakening, women, overtime, did surpass men, are surpassing men, and will continue to surpass men until the true balance is overwhelmingly clear.

Save the females. Abort the males.

It is justified, it is necessary, and its premise is Undeniably True.

Thank you for your consideration!

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 75 Comments [8/6/2012 5:20:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 95

Quote# 88634

Should handicapped people be aborted and or euthanized?

The answer is, undeniably: Yes.

They should be.

Now, allow me to explain.

People, regardless of gender, who are born with either a mental disability or a physical disability, that is of such a degree it has been socially proven to hinder normal common functions, should not be allowed to suffer through a life of misery at the hands of care-takers and or sitters.

Not only is someone who is mentally handicapped or physically handicapped a drain to society, to tax-payers, and to their own family members and “friends” who are forced to care for them each day, but they, themselves, will suffer a lifetime of meaninglessness and agony.

This has to end.

The simple solutions for this would be to:

A) Test for hindering disabilities, and upon finding one, have the child aborted at the mother’s permission (which should be greatly encouraged or even lawfully mandated).
B) Have any child who manages to be born in a way that evades abortion euthanized as soon as possible, in order to keep them from straining not only society, but their own family as well.

Men should take no roll in this decision. And, they should have no interaction with the process of aborting or euthanizing the handicapped child; for multiple reasons:

A man performing an abortion of this sort, which slightly reflects a Spartan-esque ideology, would be doing nothing more than posturing and inflating their masculinity, as they are then, by extension, the official executioner of a life which they did not birth, and physically cannot birth.

Only women should be the official “executioners” or “doctors” who perform these ceremonial procedures, because, if a woman were to do it, it would be an act of kindness by the very inherent nature of that which is female. They would be, essentially, putting a life out of its misery so that it did not have to suffer. Unlike a man, who would only be asserting his dominance over said life, which he cannot ever even hope to produce; due to lacking the necessary genetic components for giving birth.

If a male or a female is found, in the womb, to be disabled, or are able to be born with a disability, which would, in the future of their life, cause an economic, mental and physical strain on their family, and even society as a whole, they should be aborted or euthanized.

That is my verdict on this important issue.

Thank you for your consideration!


Femitheist Divine,  The New Era of Feminism 97 Comments [7/29/2012 10:53:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 84
Submitted By: Ahmer

Quote# 88542

The fact of the matter is, even then, and also now, women are still more important reproductively than men. In this world, it is not quite as necessary due to the immense numbers of the human species, but nevertheless, women are still the more important half.

For instance, if humanity were to undergo… say… a transformation of the short-term solutions sort. It would be sensible for 1-10% of the global population to remain male. For behavioral studies, and for reproductive purposes – a good example to remember is that it would require only one man to populate a city, while it would require an entire city of women for the same task. Women are more important because they bear the child, and thusly, they are needed in greater numbers.

If my short-term solutions were implemented, and men and boys were castrated in great numbers, it would make sense for some men to be able to be signed up through governmentally operated programs to become “Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm.

They would be used for sample collection based on supply-and-demand. This, along with the use of scientifically generated progeny, would be able to sustain a perfect population. Primarily female, and sufficiently - to the extent that it is necessary for sample collection - male.

Likewise, mothers or close female guardians would be advised to exempt their male children from castration if it were necessary on the basis of supply-and-demand. They could still go through with it, but they would be advised to not do so until the male grew older.

This practice of castration, Breeder usage, and sample collection would continue until it was scientifically possible to create female children entirely from the organic material of female adults. Then, the existence of men would no longer be necessary at all. Long-term solution implementation would follow.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 54 Comments [7/26/2012 3:39:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 61

Quote# 88394

It is a well-known fact that porn is a gateway for oppressive behavior, used to exploit women for the profit of others - women who are incapable of finding any other solution for gathering an income merely to survive. But, that is not the topic for this post. The topic for this post concerns male fantasies, young girls, and the potential for rape.

“Legal” pornography which involves women who are “of age”, or 18, is one of the most popular forms of pornography in regards to consumption. The attraction for men in this particular type of pornography is the youth of the girl, and to appease this attraction, the girl(s) in these movies and videos are forced to attempt to make themselves seem naively innocent, child-like, both externally and internally, in order to convey a sense of submissiveness to the male viewer.

[...]

It is my contention, because of this, that all men who desire this type of pornography are pedophiles and, inevitably, potentially dangerous rapists. They are drawn to the girl’s youth, and the fantasy that the girl is underage. It adds a sense of risk and taboo to the thrill. And, what is often cited, beyond sex, as the cause for rape? The desire for dominance and power. The difference between a girl at the age of 15 and a girl at the age of 18 is very minute, and men are capable of recognizing that.

I encourage any girl out there who is still dating a man to stop him from watching pornography, or, at the very least, if that is too daunting, find out what type of pornography he is often viewing. If it concerns young females and that sort of fantasy, I would suggest getting away from him as quickly as possible. Not only is he extremely depraved, sick and disgusting, but he is likely a pedophile, or has pedophilic desires, and he likely has a great potential for raping in the near future.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 50 Comments [7/17/2012 3:17:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 48

Quote# 112583

Do REAL men Rape?

In praise of the Caveman, wherever & whenever he may live....

Actually, REAL men DO rape. It's in our genes; hardwired into our DNA. Has been for 100,000 years. Do you really think the average caveman would have put up with all the shit that today's women make men put up with just to get laid? NO! He'd have clubbed her upside the head with his club, and dragged her by the hair (never by the feet--cuz then her crotch would fill up with dirt), back to his man-cave, and have himself a private little no-holes-barred caveman rape-a-thon!

ONLY in relatively recent times (and most especially, in post-feminist America) have men become so pussy-fied that they've all but given up on this age-old manly mating ritual. Indeed, there are only a few "real men" left. You can spot them. They are the ones who think RAPE ROCKS!

Raymond J. Pistachio, Rapetown, USA 51 Comments [9/6/2015 4:28:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 122169

The primary contribution any woman can make for science is to stay completely out of it. No matter how good she is, no matter how smart she is, she cannot possibly compensate for the complete devastation and distraction she is going to leave in her wake over the course of her career among the socially and sexually hapless gammas who might have otherwise happily spent decades slaving away in the laboratories.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 43 Comments [10/22/2016 5:17:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 32

Quote# 97124

[On extending protection to male rape victims]

And this also gets to the heart of my objection to applying the victimhood mantle to the male. Making men as physically helpless and violable as contemporary feminists hold women to be is a form of social castration. One of the defining characteristics of masculinity is the possession of agency — the ability to act. Take this away and we are slaves, so removing this from men – even with a concept ostensibly meant to “protect” men – leads us down a hole, at the bottom of which we find ourselves bereft of our manhood both culturally and legally. And make no mistake: many people really do want to rob men of their manhood. Male feminist Michael Kimmel has made a career of it.

This is not to say that men cannot be victimized or real victims; they clearly can and this has always been recognized. But the most effective means of victimizing men has always been to reduce them to a state in which they are incapable of protecting themselves and acting in their own interests, and this is accomplished as easily by feminizing them as by direct force of arms.

When a woman appeals to people for help and protection, she is engaged in an empowering act. When men rush to a woman’s aid, it demonstrates her female potency. When her “needs” are met by others, it does not detract from but rather adds to her status. For ancient, immutable reasons, this does not apply to men.

The man who cries “help” feels a certain shame. When he must apply for welfare, it is humiliating and emasculating. That men must swallow their pride and do so from time to time is a given, but almost all of us recognize that it is far from ideal when the necessity presents itself. Ideally, the man has agency, and can fend for himself. In a society that valued men, steps would be taken to ensure that men have the opportunity to do so. A society that enshrines male victimhood is the exact opposite.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 25 Comments [10/19/2013 6:43:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 32

Quote# 104365

We could also say that men are simple biological machines as well, as they would fuck basically anything if allowed.

That’s why we need extremely strict rules and harsh punishments for both genders when it comes to things like adultery. A man who commits adultery with another man’s wife must know he will, if discovered, die.

Also, you’re once again incredibly naive. If you support women’s suffrage you can’t support female premarital chastity. I mean, you can, but that’s insane, as it makes no sense and is contradictory.

A woman's suffrage is a feminist policy and means that women will vote themselves priviledges that will enable them to be sluts.

It’s like saying you support democracy but won’t support something the demos votes for – not possible.

Your ideas are like saying “I support billions being thrown into war machine but I oppose war.”

C’mon.

caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 82 Comments [10/28/2014 3:09:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 103091

In a recently published VICE interview, she explains femitheism as follows: "I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class – a far more valued class – having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death."

To be fair, she doesn't believe that men should be slaughtered, but that they should be gradually phased out of the population through genetic engineering and possibly selective abortions. And she claims that these steps would not be mandated, "at first," but merely encouraged. Children would very much designed, and raised communally by the state. "Perfect girls will be conceived, developed, and engineered in state-owned breeding centers. They will be bound together in a communal venue under the instruction and control of female savants."

The few men that are left would be kept on their own reservations and used only for breeding, possibly some light labor. When asked if she acknowledged that some men have ambitions beyond "luxury breeding pens," she answered: "Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null."

Femitheist Divine, Outer Places 68 Comments [9/1/2014 3:38:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 122583

[In July, Kathryn B. H. Clancy and her co-authors Robin G. Nelson, Julienne N. Rutherford and Katie Hinde published a survey of 666 field-based scientists in the journal PLoS One and reported that 26 percent of the female scientists surveyed had been sexually assaulted during fieldwork.]

Of course, the push to encourage women in science is only going to cause more such sexual assaults to take place, which is one more reason why it is a bad idea. Science doesn't need more women, especially if more women in the field are going to help transform otherwise good male scientists into rapists and sex criminals.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 30 Comments [11/18/2016 2:45:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: David

Quote# 125346

If a woman doesn't masturbate when looking at you then she doesn't like you

She is wondering why subhumans like you exist on earth. If she does like you she will get nervous and horny and start touching her hair or cross her arms or grab her hand in a desperate attempt to prevent herself from touching her vagina while getting off mentally at the same time. It's really obvious and kinda cute.

thegambler952, /r/incels 32 Comments [3/12/2017 1:13:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125134

Stupid cunt was trying to roast a fellow incel friend and I unleashed on her

Yesterday I went to the shops with a friend of mine and since my friend and I are trying to grow out of inceldom we were trying to make small talk with good looking girls and my friend when buying a movie ticket saw a relatively good looking girl, probably around a 6-7/10. He went up to her when buying a ticket and I sunk into the backdrop as I let him try to do his thing, the typical "Do I know you from somewhere?" routine and things, I thought, were going well. She was about to give the ticket over and held it back and asked "Are you hitting on me?" he responded with something like "well yeah I saw you and I went to this register just because I thought you were pret-" she cuts him off with "Ohhhh 'kaaay..well can you not? I'd never dare to be seen with someone as ugly as you her friend leans in and starts giggling. Did you even know if I had a boyfriend? Because I do, so please fuck off."

I was standing there in shock and then I finally burst with rage, asking her how much of a cunt she is and how fucked up her face was. I'm a decent looking incel so she couldn't really say much. I laid into her about her disgusting frizzy hair and her crooked sickening nose and how small her tits are and that she should be happy any guys hit on her whatsoever. My heart was rapid as I stuttered out insults about her disgusting skin tone and acne. She eventually walked away and as we walked away I turned around and she had her head in her hands sobbing and her coworker was trying to console her. As soon as we got out of the movie she was gone, I assume she got sent home.

Stupid fucking cunt, this is what you get. I'm sick of it. I'm pissed and I'm not taking this shit anymore, roasties will get fucking demolished anytime they try to be cunts.

Women are shit and after yesterday I have given up on the "hunt"

incel_INHELL, /r/incels 37 Comments [3/4/2017 5:21:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 24448

We a very happy young couple. My wife is a submissive wife and we believe that the man is the Head of the Household. We are seeking a submissive live-in to be part of our family. She needs to be under 30 b/c she cannot be older than my wife. She needs to be able to perform light housework, child care, and other duties.

We are both college educated with my wife attending medical school. Our marriage is Christian based and the sub-in-training must have the same beliefs.

She must be willing to be trained as a submissive in the house. There is no sex involved with the husband. At the moment, no sex is planned with the wife but that may change.

The sub must be willing to be disciplined and trained by the HOH as he sees fit. We would like to move slowly and have a lot of conversations via the internet before we would even think about talking live.

At the moment, we can only provide room and board so the sub must be willing to work part-time. All that could change when the wife b/c a doctor.
Please email pics if you are interested or want more information.

pers-320555401, craigslist 44 Comments [4/30/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125505

Women who support gay rights but refuse to have anal sex are the weakest race.What do you think your gay besties are doing behind closed doors, honey? Holding hands while humming "It's Raining Men?"

Matt Forney, Gab 19 Comments [3/18/2017 1:18:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125541

[Comment under "Informative Pics for MGTOW"]



VileNord, Men Going Their Own Way 18 Comments [3/19/2017 1:52:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 125499

Much as I like to trumpet the importance of a woman's right to choose all things at all times, there's one choice I simply cannot understand: the choice of an otherwise sane and healthy woman not to have children.

If a would-be mother is a singleton of 40 who decides to have a baby without a partner, I might wish she'd thought of it sooner and prepared for it better - but I understand.

If she's half of a lesbian couple who 'borrows' the wherewithal, I might cross my fingers that the child is not teased at school - but I understand. Even if she's a 66-year- old pregnant pensioner, threatening to turn motherhood into a freak show, I might (indeed, I do) think she's monstrously selfish and dangerously wrong - but again, more or less, I understand.

Yet if she says she hasn't a shred of maternal feeling in her, moreover, if she says she would prefer to concentrate on her career and that a child would only get in the way of it, then my head might acknowledge her right to do so. But my heart whispers: 'Lady, you're weird.'

It was welcome news, therefore, to discover this week that I am not alone. Research conducted over six years shows that far from bosses and colleagues always being suspicious of a working mother, the opposite is becoming true: it is the childless woman who is regarded as cold and odd.

As a result, it is these single-track careerists who are increasingly likely to be vilified, refused jobs and denied promotion because many employers believe them to lack what the study calls 'an essential humanity'. And I know exactly what they mean.

In the little hothouse of my own trade as a hack, I play a game with myself. Reading all the other female scribblers, sometimes with grudging admiration and sometimes none at all, I try to guess from their expression of their world view whether or not they are mothers.

I haven't - yet - been wrong. Now, with MPs so much in the headlines, I've extended the game and started to guess about the women among them, too.

As far as I can tell, my score is also pretty high there - even though it's just a feeling. On both sides of the political divide, as with the writers, it's not what MPs say or do, so much as how they go about it.

'Mothers bring something extra'

And if that touch of 'essential humanity' - or its absence - colours such notably tough professions, it's hardly surprising that employers are starting to notice that the same applies across the spectrum of workplaces.

Of course, we need not be silly about it.

Nobody wishes to see a female soldier in combat with a six-week-old infant in one arm and a rifle in the other.

Or a high-flier working 20-hour days while still breast-feeding. Or the mother of a small brood taking on any job of such erratic hours that she cannot promise them when or even if she'll be home.

But most jobs aren't like that - and most children don't stay babies for long.

Besides which, in my experiences both as a colleague and an employer, I have found that mothers almost always bring something extra to the job, to the benefit of all.

It's not the mothers, for a start, who are going to turn up late and hungover after a night on the razz; they'll have been up, dressed and alert for hours, having cooked a family breakfast and delivered their children to school. On time.

It's not the mothers, usually, who run the office bitch-fest.

They're not there to compete for the attentions of the male executives; they're there to get out of the house; they're there because they genuinely enjoy some adult company; and they're there because they have mouths to feed other than their own and shoes to buy for someone else's feet.

Two-thirds of working mothers, a recent survey found, could not provide for the children they love in the manner they would wish if they lost their jobs. So there's incentive for you.

They will, it is true, snatch time off for poorly children and Christmas carol services. And it's true they will insist that, in return for arriving on the dot of 9am, they must also leave on the dot of 5pm.

But rarely have I encountered a mother who did not offer to make up time lost, often in lunch hours. As for leaving on time, put enough mothers together in one workplace and you'll get rid of the ghastly ethos of 'presenteeism', whereby people vie for plaudits based solely on how late - albeit often uselessly - they hang around the office.

The prioritising that may baffle other people is a cinch for a woman who has spent years juggling a household. Negotiating skills? A request for 10 per cent off an overdue invoice is nothing to a woman who has had to broker a deal on Britain's Got Talent versus bedtime.

When it comes to emergencies, if you have run all the way to a clinic with a terrified toddler vomiting down your neck then, trust me, a package delayed in transit is a piece of cake. And if those are the tangibles, the intangibles - the 'essential humanity' - are more important still.

You cannot be a mother without knowing something about selflessness, compassion, generosity, commitment, fierce loyalty and plain hard work. You cannot - surely - be a boss and not value assets such as those in your staff.

Nor is it the boss who pays the price for the extras a mother brings with her; she's the one who pays for that. Enough reams have been written about the long hours of slog it takes to run a home and hold down a job at the same time. Yet still we keep doing it because we want our work, our independence and our money.

But, more than all the things we want, we actually need our children; they complete us as women, they are our light and our love and our legacy.

We feel desperately sorry for those who yearn for children they cannot have; the unwilling barren, if you will. But when we meet a woman who chooses her childlessness in the belief that there is something out there worth more, we smile politely even while - once again - our guts whisper: 'Lady, you're weird.'

So three cheers for the employers who are catching on, the ones who don't want to people their workforces with the cold, the calculating, the sad and the mad. The only question is: what took you so long?

Carol Sarler, Daily Mail 16 Comments [3/18/2017 2:52:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Father of the Year Award

May Bubba exert "poetic justice" on you!

Quote# 125565

A dad from Texas has been convicted for forcing his 16-year-old daughter to become a prostitute as a punishment for being sexually active. The 46-year-old Scot Rodney Robinson was found guilty of first-degree felony charge and sent away to jail. He plead guilty for forcing her into prostitution at truck stops.

According to KRTK, when the father found out that his daughter was already sexually active at age 16 he wanted to punish her for it. The young girl said that her dad forced her to “service” truck drivers and even took the money she earned.

“He basically told her, ‘If you’re gonna be a wh**e, we’re gonna treat ya like one,'” said JoAnne Musick, chief of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office Sex Crimes Division.

Robinson has a thick criminal record and has already faced charges related to burglary, criminal trespass, drug possession and auto theft.

Scot Rodney Robinson, Buzz Fanzine 18 Comments [3/21/2017 2:23:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125256

@eivind
You pointed out an intersting poin that actually does not exist: my fault, sorry.
I forgot to point that Saudi Arabia has an huge problem with spinsterhood. So, saudi men have already the chaches to get women.
In my opinion is a law manufactured just against men like me, who decide to live their life following a law that is noth the one of their contries, to make impossible for us to get decent women even if we move there.
In other countries like Pakistan, where men are weakened by western propaganda through satanic sluts like Malala, the feminists managed to pass the very same law of the west, like aoc at 16.
Since in Saudi Arabia it is not possible because local men would rise up, alhamdulillah!!!, they managed at least to ruin the lives of oppressed desperate western men who were getting ready to move.
It's the war on western men.

Anonymous, Eivind Berge's Blog 11 Comments [3/9/2017 3:19:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: dd

Quote# 125367

Reminder that your value as a person is made up purely of your face and body

Your entire human value is completely dependant on how attractive you are, how tall you are, how big your torso is, and other indicators of your GENETICS

Traits like kindness, loyalty, intelligence, these are completely meaningless and irrelevent in society


cuckcel, /r/incels 30 Comments [3/13/2017 2:54:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125589

A former guard at an Australian youth detention centre has admitted filming himself asking teenage inmates for oral sex.

Conan Zamolo's testimony came during a royal commission inquiry into youth detention in the Northern Territory.

The commission was launched last year after photos showing inmates being strip-searched and placed in a spit hood drew widespread condemnation.

Mr Zamolo said his requests for oral sex were "a joke".

"I was actually just going to say goodnight to them because I was leaving shift," Mr Zamolo said on Monday.

"I knew they'd take it as a joke, or I just assumed they would take it as a joke."

Mr Zamolo also admitted to urging another inmate to eat faeces, and to filming a boy urinating.

"At the time I didn't think it was inappropriate, but now I see how inappropriate it is," he said.

He claimed he had a good relationship with the detainees.

The incidents happened at the Don Dale Youth Detention Centre, where Mr Zamolo worked from 2012 to 2014.

The Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory follows widespread condemnation of the treatment of detainees at Don Dale in 2014 and 2015.

In 2015, Amnesty International described the regime at the centre as "institutionalised brutality", with teenagers being held in solitary confinement with no access to light or water for long periods.

Conan Zamolo, BBC News 7 Comments [3/21/2017 2:28:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 125532

Men cannot be raped but we do have our own equivalent, of being cuckolded and tricked into raising somebody who isn’t our own genes which is worse than any of that including prison rape.

Also as for how beta males’ genes from its because patriarchy protected us from the will of hypergamous alpha-hunting women by suppressing their interests, and putting mens’ first. Without patriarchy betas wouldn’t be here.

Women produce nothing of value in this world, they exploit us men for it and we have nothing to lose but our chains in this society against the gynocentric collective matriarchy, when MGTOW-led unions(Not Marxist, Feminist degenerate ones) start forming one day we are going to have all men strike and stop working. And bring down civilization or society as a whole for revenge of your exploitation of us. Women want men to do all the work anyway and don’t do anything so it will be quite easy.


MGTOWRevolutionary, We Hunted The Mammoth 21 Comments [3/18/2017 10:52:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 125282

A Canadian federal judge who asked a woman in a rape trial why she couldn't keep her knees together resigned Thursday after a disciplinary council recommended he be removed from the bench.
...
Camp argued that "unconscious bias" was to blame for the offending comments. In addition to asking the 19-year-old why she didn't keep her knees together to fend off her alleged attacker, he also asked her why she didn't "skew her pelvis" to avoid penetration.
...
Camp made the comments as a provincial court judge in a 2014 trial. He became a federal judge in 2015.
He also remarked that, "Some sex and pain sometimes go together ... that's not necessarily a bad thing."
Camp acquitted the accused man and offered him some advice:
"I want you to tell your friends, your male friends, that they have to be far more gentle with women. They have to be far more patient. And they have to be very careful. To protect themselves, they have to be very careful."


Robin Camp, CNN.com 44 Comments [3/10/2017 12:30:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 125645

Most Americans have been led to despise foreign cultures where women are not allowed to walk around immodestly clothed, nor is feminist rebellion tolerated, nor can women run their big mouths in men's matters. The truth is that the Muslim culture comes a lot closer to being right than American culture. I'm not saying that I approve of everything done in Muslim culture, but they are 100% correct to require women to dress appropriately in public, to cover themselves and to remain silent in men's matters. Americans view other cultures which require women to dress properly and wear head-coverings as being oppressive and cruel cultures. When it comes to the way women dress, behave and talk, we have the immoral disease in America, not the Muslims.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [3/22/2017 12:57:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 125366

In other words, if a woman just doesn't look your way while touching herself whether that be her hair or cleavage (yes, I've seen it happen out in the blue), then you are not desirable. I am not desirable, I belong here.

Women are evil as fuck..

(They're evil because they're not into you??)

They're evil because women shit on me throughout my life and continue to shit on me or disregard me, but that's okay. This just means I don't have to give a damn about them and their problems, their rights, etc. If anything, they deserve to get their rights taken away, fucking privileged whores.

GorePunkSpidey, /r/incels 20 Comments [3/13/2017 2:54:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125420

How can you not hate women?

Hate.

I hate them.

Their stupid fucking smiles. Women smile more because they live life on easy mode. They have no reason to be unhappy.

All they have to do is walk into a room and all the attention is on them. People will cater to their every whim just because they were born with a vagina.

Meanwhile, I'm bullied all throughout school. I'm treated like scum. Insulted by everyone. The only times people have called me attractive were when they were saying it sarcastically. That hurts more than just being called ugly.

They contribute nothing to conversation. They think they can say any useless thing, and the sad reality is they can, because idiot men will eat it up. "Oh my god, you're right. The sky is blue! I've never looked at it like that before."

They don't have to try. They don't have to do anything. And people will love them.

You can call me vocel, but if you live 25+ years without getting attention from women, and you're still being nice to them, then you're absolutely pathetic. These creatures want nothing to do with you, and yet you're still nice and all smiles. Do you have any self worth at all?

There are times when I'm nice to women. At restaurants, for example. Always gotta be nice to those who prepare your food.

But seriously, there are legitimate exceptions to the women I hate. Fat chicks are not one of them. The're just like the rest, if not worse due to overcompensation. However, disfigured women (growths on the face, for example) aren't like the rest. Generally, anyway. It's mostly a case by case basis when it comes to disfigurements. I will also not be mean to women with serious medical issues. I'm not going to be mean to cancer patients. I'm not a monster.

It's ironic though. If I ever got cancer, I'm sure they'd still be mean to me.

andiswearrrr, /r/incels 16 Comments [3/15/2017 12:35:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124901

[A gunman who shot dead eight people in an upmarket beauty salon in California is said to have gone on the rampage after losing a custody battle over his son. Scott Dekraai, who is the former husband of one of the stylists, is said to have shot a total of nine hairdressers and customers at Salon Meritage, a beauty salon just blocks from the Pacific Ocean in the upscale seaside resort of Seal Beach.

His ex-wife, Michelle, is also reportedly among those who were killed. The 42-year-old, who used to work in the military, had allegedly threatened violence after losing a court case against Michelle - who was using the name Huff - over the custody of their seven-year-old son, Dominic.]

The problem is twofold. First, the family court system is totally unjust. Second, there is simply no other recourse for the man who has been forcibly robbed of his children by the unholy alliance of ex-wife and family court. I have zero sympathy for any woman who would utilize the force of the law to deprive a man of his children, no matter how unhappy the marriage. In fact, one can quite reasonably argue that it is in the interest of women to demand a more equitable family court system; this should become more apparent when "winning" a child custody case amounts to a potential death lottery.

The ironic thing is that society tends to applaud a man who do anything and pay any price to get back his child. There are movies entirely based on this premise. So, why should it surprise anyone that increasing numbers of men are willing to resort to breaking the very law that took their children away from them? Throughout the West, the Muslims have shown the way: threaten sufficient violence in a credible manner and the law will be modified according to your will.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 21 Comments [2/26/2017 6:55:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: David

Nice Guy™ In A Nutshell

Quote# 124146

Opening doors for women is a chivalrous activity that gives men an opportunity to check out and/or smack women's asses.

Article "Holding doors for women", Kings Wiki 24 Comments [2/1/2017 12:49:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125634

Our language needs honorifics similar to the japanese

Just like the japanese do: Chan, sama, san, kami, kun, senpai, sensei, dono

Except ours needs to be more reflective our our fucked society:

Kuk - Clueless normie whose female has fucked countless guys.

cel - Average incel

roas - typical roastie

norm - typical normie in denial of reality

Dahc(pronounced daaaK) - typical chad

Ghad - A godly chad, the top 1% of males.

sati - A form of normie who reaches chad like status by compensating for his lack of genetics through status or wealth. Yet he will never be truly loved like a chad, he merely lives like one.

Examples: "Ah Elliot sati, your business is quite remarkable." -Eric. "Yes Eric sati, its too bad about James kuk and Ellis kuk who don't know we're fucking their girls." -Elliot. "What are you fags talking about?" -Anders. "Nothing Anders Ghad! Please excuse us." -Eric

livinginhell101, /r/incels 21 Comments [3/22/2017 9:46:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 120554

Just speaking from my own experience here. I dont believe in platonic relationships. Unless the guy is gay or impotent. No just impotent, because gay guys would still do it. LOL..

My ex had a lot more guy friends than girl friends. Also her "best friend" was a guy, she told me this in the beginning. I trusted her but in the back of my mind was still a bit leery.

For good reason. She slept with her best friend and another friend. Who knows how long they have been sleeping together, but I was not there to find out. I was gone real fast.

Bottom line a guy will always want to fuck his girl friends, he's hoping to be that shoulder to lean on. Or just hang out get drunk and have casual sex as if its nothing.


onedaily, isitnormal.com 10 Comments [7/17/2016 6:56:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125355

Men seriously suck. I fkn hate 'em... There I've come right out and finally said it. I fucking hate men with a level of hate I never knew I had in me. They terrorize women across the planet and have throughout all of history and the "good ones" stand by and watch it happen and do NOTHING... I want a new world without men. Seriously, a new planet...I just read a story about a disgusting man with half a head try to rape a woman then burn down her house, (I guess the half head part of him is what made him fail at the rape, but it almost happened)....the picture of him just made me want to throw up, even without the majority of his brain, he still has the need to kill, maim, rape etc...it's what they do, it's what they are...they're animals...they are fkng mutants, I'm so convinced...I want a male free planet. NOW. Nuclear war wouldn't even be a threat if it weren't for men. The world and all life on earth will probably end because men need to assert their dominance over all living things and everyone in the world. It's the ultimate dick wag! At least one guy "gets it" about how fucked men are: George Carlin with his "Male Disease" act....but that's about it. I seriously hate men.

Just Passing Through , Feminist Current 28 Comments [3/13/2017 8:00:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By:

Quote# 125702

There are 2 ways to Eradicate Slutiness from the Female Race

1. Remove them from society entirely. They never have any interaction with males, ever. They do dirty work in internment camps, and are artificially inseminated.
2. Remove them from society temporarily, until they are ready for an arranged marriage. During this time, they are constantly belittled and mentally abused to the point where they have no self esteem. Then, they will not have the courage or confidence to whore around.

(Comment by ban_collector)
Excellent ideas. Most of us incels would probably prefer the 2nd option because we get a wife, but maybe the first is more wise in the long run. The government will have to fund research to create artificial waifus for us in that case.

ItheIthe and ban_collector, /r/incels 13 Comments [3/24/2017 5:23:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125422

It’s an open question whether our Masturbators of the Universe intentionally or accidentally unleashed forces (abortion, condoms, the Pill, penicillin, poz, female economic self-sufficiency aka the Six Sirens of the Sexual Apocalypse) that would sever at every level sex from marriage and children, and thus lead to the low fertility of the West and the poisoning of relationships that naturally percolates when women are surrounded by weak, deferential men and men are left with the prospect of marrying road-worn sluts who secretly still pine for the dazzling cads of their nightclub bathroom passion play memories, but it’s indisputable that the oligarchs and Bezosians and open border 1%ers prefer a deracinated, dehumanized world bazaar with women freed from the constraints of early marriage and motherhood to consume, capitulate, and clog the globohomo capitalist self-negate machine as happy little office cogs.

In my opinion, the current situation is unsustainable. Something’s gotta give. In a near-future post, I will explain how our postmodern sexual market dovetails with evidence that the West is careening toward idiocracy.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 25 Comments [3/15/2017 3:36:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125392

2nd question: why are you a misandrist?



Because men continue to perpetrate violence against me in both a personal and systemic way that makes it difficult for me to trust men by default. Not impossible, but difficult.



I could say NotAllMen, but that doesn’t seem like it’ll affect someone like you. I sympathize if you’ve had bad experiences with men in your life, but to jump the gun all the way to misandry is not only extreme and radical, it’s a dangerous way of thinking. It’s judging the many based on the few, so your misandry is already poisoned by subjective bias.




It is self protection that harms no one. Distrusting men keeps me WAY more safe than openly trusting men does.
My distrust of men doesn’t harm them, but it keeps me safer. Yet people want to wax theoretical about it.
I know misandrists. People who have been hurt. Not once, not twice, but over a lifetime and in a manner that impacts on their ability to simply exist in their day to day lives.
Yet almost all misandrists I know have some men who are friends, they love their family and they actively support men who are victims of rape.
Trusting men, ESPECIALLY cishet white men is a painful process that often involves me having to be continually hurt in order to educate and set up my own boundaries.
Misandry isn’t jumping the gun, it’s putting your feet into the starting block and being ready for the shot you know will come.

GeekandMisandry, tumblr 2 Comments [3/14/2017 10:12:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 125571

The busted dudes test is, according to Roosh, the only quality one needs to look for when deciding where to stay while abroad: "Is it common to see a busted guy with a pretty girl on his arm?" If within my first day in a country one sees pretty girls with busted dudes who aren't decked out in Hugo Boss or gold jewelry, one knows the sexual market is skewed in the man’s favor.[1] According to Roosh, the busted test "Includes everything. A guy with an okay face but 30 pounds overweight wearing jean shorts and white tube socks would be classified as busted."[2]

Roosh V, Kings Wiki 13 Comments [3/20/2017 1:42:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125460


It has been said to me that I must hate feminism so much because I hate women.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

It is because I actually care about my fellow women that I loathe feminism and speak out against it so often. Feminism is a way for a small number of very evil men to gain control over a large segment of other men. Women are merely useful pawns (but oh, how useful!).

Feminism in no way, shape, or form leads to outcomes that are in women’s best interests. The incredible decline in average happiness of modern women, as documented by the very liberal Wolfers and Stevenson, compared to just a few decades ago is evidence of the misery that feminism has inflicted upon Womankind.

Sunshine Thiry, Sunshine Thiry 12 Comments [3/17/2017 2:48:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125330





unknow, slideshare.net 17 Comments [3/12/2017 2:10:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125331



unknow, slideshare.net 21 Comments [3/12/2017 2:15:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125347

If you're considering therapy and your therapist isn't directing you to the nearest maxillofacial specialist within the first 15 minutes of your first appointment then...

You just got maliciously played for your hard earned incel money. Your therapist should be calling you ugly within the first 10 minutes of talking if they are legit. If your therapist isn't encouraging you to get your face fixed as soon as humanely possible then you need to walk out immediately and demand a reimbursement.

The only reason you should see a therapist is to collude together so you can do some proper social networking together in order to optimize your success for receiving donations on your GoFundMe page so you can fund your surgeries.

Looks-are-everything, /r/incels 20 Comments [3/12/2017 1:13:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125661

Roastie

The degenerated condition of the average sexually-liberated western female's vagina, as a result of riding the cock carousel through her teens and 20's before hitting the wall and trying to get one of the beta bux -- who she denied while it was still tight and she still looked good -- to put a ring on her finger and lick her recycled Arby's; which he will, because the world is full of thirsty beta enablers stupid enough to marry women who have had their capacity to love atomized into obliteration over a decade of getting shaken like she's in a paint shaker and then painted by cocks whose names she doesn't even remember.

Beta Bux Bill: I'm so happy to be marrying her. I had such a crush on her in high school, but she wouldn't even look at me. But now she's a bit less tight, a bit more blown out, her face lost a few points with the sun damage and semen damage, and, well, actually she's a full-blown roastie, actually it looks like roadkill between her legs, but that's okay, she's my soulmate, and I'm taking the high road by inviting all of the guys she fucked to the wedding; we needed to rent a megachurch.

Stacy the Fiance: "Who's that guy you invited to the wedding?"
Beta Bux Bill: "That's Chad, you said to invite him?"
Stacy the Fiance: "Oh, yeah! I'm gonna go say hi to him before we start the ceremony"
** 10 minutes they've both been gone **
** moans coming from the toilet **


MrChase, Urban Dictionary 26 Comments [3/23/2017 6:07:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125264

(OP by FloridaTulpamancer)
Do You Think There Will Ever be an "Ugly Culture?"

The deaf community has some of them who have created "Deaf Culture." They think being deaf is a good thing. There's already a political party in Japan based around being ugly. Is it possible that there will one day be a subculture grown out of ugly people? (Maybe one that doesn't discriminate on looks or celebrate Valentine's or whatever.)

(AllahWilling)
Already exists. The vidya culture consists of subhuman faggots. It was destined.

(NewLoadsOfFun)
That is slowly being invaded by women who want attention from all the men there

(Societys_Claws)
And the result is this

[Link removed]

What was great turns into a steaming pile of shit. And the subhuman faggots move on to something that's still good.

Various incels, /r/incels 20 Comments [3/9/2017 6:04:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125397

Testosterone levels have been plummeting in Western men for at least two generations and this fact is without question. I will speculate in this post what a multigenerational, age-independent decline in T will portend for American society, should the trend not shortly reverse itself.

women will dress and act sluttier to capture the attention of increasingly benumbed men who need the services of the hardest of hardcore porn to feel aroused.
team sports will disappear.
drama club will be a required class.
politics will intensify its shift leftward because low T men will vote more like women.
the national (and psychological) borders protecting the low T men from predation will remain, for all practical purposes, open to the sewer world until, inevitably, higher T conquerors arrive in sufficient number to wipe out the low T White submissivists.
inventiveness and entrepreneurship will stagnate, and contract.
any big job or goal will demand more oversight, more paper pushing, more regulatory hurdles to overcome. the days when men gathered and made shit happen on a reasonable time frame will be over. it’ll be an HR dystopia of endless meetings all the way down to the musty cellar of the gossip mill.
corporations will turn into ghettos of bickering crones, slutty college girls, and yes-manlets. nothing will be produced but social media apps and articles about online dating. the resulting economic collapse will create a run on arable urban land as millions of useless SWPLs fight to the death for patches of communal gardens to plant their sad kale and heirloom tomatoes.
therapy and self-medication will shoot through the roof.
heart disease, cancer, and obesity will rise again (or continue the general upwards rise) among men.
the rate of infidelity will increase.
the rate of divorce will hold steady or increase (we may have hit the divorce industrial complex saturation point).
marriage will increasingly be platforms for brides to take selfies and grooms to blubber during the vows. jerkboy best men will be tasked with the job of deflowering any virgin brides remaining in the wilds as the soyfatted grooms recite lines from their favorite feminist poets.
fertility will continue declining.
the rate of cuckoldry will increase.
cat ownership will increase among men.
muscle cars will become a distant relic.
there will be vanishingly little entertainment made with a straight male sensibility in mind.
weird sexual paraphilias and fetishes will rise (those afflicted with declining libido will compensate with outlandish substitutes to bring back that lovin’ feeling).
the prevalence of sexual dysfunctions will increase.
feminism will get increasingly shrill, and male feminists increasingly servile and pathetic.
the population of basement bachelors, cat ladies and bitter spinsters will explode.
sexbots will be the only romantic companionship for half the population.
high libido men — cads — will reign supreme in the actual sexual market (what’s left of it) as opposed to the pretend sexual market that lonely feminists jabber about during their intersectionality bullshit sessions.
androgyny will become the norm.
polyandry will be common.
polygyny will be rare, but more entrenched. (the few high T men who aren’t eunuchs will have no trouble keeping de facto harems of smitten lovers satisfied and compliant)
balls, penises, jawlines, chins, noses, and musculature will literally shrink in men. ears may become floppy.
a million sociologists with shitty research papers no one has any intention of replicating will claim that beta male orbiters are our strength. they will write of the virtues of polygamy and the matriarchy, as their civilization burns down around them.
no one will ever again speak anything close to the truth about the world, about the sexes, about the races. equalist self-delusion will be taught in schools under the subject “everything but math”.
math will succumb soon afterward.
art will suck. music will suck. architecture will suck. literature will suck. this will continue a trend long evident. houellebecq may very well be our last great author.
tissue boxes will be handed out in movie theaters so that the 70-30 male-female audience may dab their eyes sitting through a full line-up of sappy rom-coms.
Mars? Uh, no. More like, the space program will be dead and the androgynes of the future will come to remember the moon landing as a myth promulgated by ancient hirsute men imprisoned in a strictly binary sexuality, who possessed a vestigial feature called a “jawline” and squinted a lot.
infrastructure will continue crumbling. instead of doing something about it, everyone will wait for the next tragedy when a bridge fails and then participate in a candlelight vigil and cry a lot. they will repeat this process until everyone is dead from preventable tragedies.
John Scalzi will be Premier of this Empire of Aromatase. His rule will not last long. Muslims, blacks, and black Muslims will overrun the Femme West and every capital will ring out with the dulcet ululations of muhammed’s flock.

Recall the Law of Gender Conservation:

?Masculinity = ?Femininity

Or, ?T = ?E, for short.

Nature abhors a testosterone vacuum. If one tribe’s men has low T, the fapuum will be filled with (in no particular order or likelihood of emergence):

invader men who have higher T
aggrocunts of man-jaw and boy-hip who have lower E (to align with the lower T of their men)
intratribe men with high T who somehow evolved an immunity against the low T disease.

Option one is genocide. Not fun.
Option two is bed death. Not fun.
Option three is our best bet for saving the West. Society will rebound as Nature, in her infinite wisdom, entrusts the low T landscape to high T spermlords who, despite feminists’ faux abhorrence to the contrary, will piledrive a wide swath through a lot of parched pussy that has spent decades lost in an anhedonic wilderness of un-men.

But if we don’t get our borders under control and stop seeding our water supply with endocrine-disrupting chemsexicals, Option Three will never have a chance to pass.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 22 Comments [3/14/2017 10:19:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125484

A few murmurs of dissent rose at the 15th All World Dawoodi Bohra Conference in Udaipur as the topic of validity of the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) or khatna came up on Sunday.

A voice of dissent against the ban came from Gazanfer Okasa, the general secretary of the Bohra Youth Association. “Khatna shouldn’t be linked to FGM,” said Okasa, refering to the Grade 2, 3 and 4 level female genital mutilation practised in African countries, which could involve total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora. “In our community, we cut a little part, unlike in African countries. Though my sister, who is a doctor, and my mother strictly condemn this practice, I am in favour of khatna because I believe it is a part of our Sharia.”

The Bohra community, a sub-sect of Ismaili Shia Islam, remove the prepuce from the genitalia of girls before puberty.

Gazanfer Okasa, 15th All World Dawoodi Bohra Conference 6 Comments [3/18/2017 2:50:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Hu's On First

Quote# 125583



WHAM, break down.
Happy well adjusted normal girls do not give themselves a desexing crew cut.
This was professionally shot and take a good long look at how broken her eyes still managed to look



A few years later and she is exploring bestiality

Cataline Sergius, The Dark Herald 8 Comments [3/21/2017 2:24:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 112550

Plain and simple. She broke her promise. Now, she's lying about it and trying to play the victim. Like many others, she values what man thinks way more than what God thinks. Instead of advocating for chastity, now she's advocating for promiscuity. She appears to be no different than the other scantily-clad bimbos in the entertainment industry.

SupermanHere, The Christian Post 10 Comments [9/5/2015 5:38:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125329



(Next page)


unknow, shareslide.net 23 Comments [3/12/2017 2:10:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125411

Missing the point

Some of you are missing the Point. Sure it is possible to lose your virginity after 21 or even get into a relationship. But if you are doing it with an average female the chances of a equitable relationship are zero.

Let's say you 23 and never dated. Your girl is also 23 and has lead a normal existence. Not even slutting it up she would have double digit sex partners assuming she's lost her virginity at 17 and only had two partner she per year.

So you get in a relationship with her and she has all these experiences and you have none. Are you going to lie about it or tell the truth? She can probably tell anyway so you might as well tell the truth. But now she knows you're a loser- there IS A REASON YOU HAVENT HAD SEX BY 21.

Remember that the person who cares less in a relationship has the most power. If I have options I care less. That's the entire point. If I'm a girl with 50 guys in my phone who I could hit up at any time- why would I put up with any shit from a virgin? The only way that relationship works is if the virgin falls in line completely. This is how beta bucks are crafted and is the entire point of the post and this sub in general imho.

I think there should be a dramatic shift from trying to escape inceldom twords embracing it and becoming MGTOW.

Deane_, /r/incels 17 Comments [3/15/2017 7:53:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125629

I don’t know exactly how to explain it, but there’s something offensive about pushing a stroller. However, my Irish grandpa, who was very much a tough working man (he was a teamster and foreman at the local brewery — his wife never wore pants or even drove a car), used to push me around on a stroller when I was very small. He’d take me for walks down into the woods in a local park every morning. But I guess when you’re a tough old man you don’t have much left to prove.

The thing is, babies are a woman’s job. I know this because I had to take care of my daughter all by myself quite a bit when she was still arguably an infant. It was no picnic, and I could barely handle it, but I did. If mommy is in the picture, there’s no reason a man should be caring for an infant — men just aren’t equipped for it. It is not only humiliating, but counterproductive.

How would women feel if they were asked to change tires or jack up a car? How about split wood or hammer nails? Many may say “I can do that,” but the truth is that the vast majority of women would look ridiculous trying to do these things. There’s even a good chance they’d hurt themselves.

Probably one of the biggest problems in society now is that our economy and technology have evolved to the point where these man jobs simply aren’t as valuable or necessary as they used to be, but child care, due to the immense amount of time involved in raising children, remains a very important job; unfortunately it simply doesn’t pay. So men are increasingly useless, and you have guys getting shoved into the unnatural role of raising small children, whereas a father’s equal involvement with children should start around school age, when the kids are capable of doing a lot more for themselves and need the discipline and instruction that best comes from a masculine figure.

Unfortunately, young men simply don’t have all that much to offer, so the deal they get stuck with is often pretty lousy. In a number of major cities, young men are already out-earned by young women. This obviously changes power dynamics. This is why you see these guys with papooses.

This is not the first time this has happened, and it always ends in social disaster. What do young men do when they find themselves unneeded and pushed around by society? In most cases they eventually start banding together and taking things. I think we’ll see a lot more rejection of society’s mores by young men pretty soon. The bitchier and more imperious women get, the faster the seeds of insurrection will take root.

Welmer, Chateau Heartiste 13 Comments [3/22/2017 9:45:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125390

Women need to stop thinking they have anything of value to say to us

As a gender you are inherently intellectually inferior to the point where you can not really be considered human. How could you possibly think you have some wise advice we, with our human level minds didn't think of? It would be like a 4 year old telling an adult how to do his taxes. You have value in society obviously, but it comes from being sexually attractive, not being smart. Please stick to your strengths. If you want to give us some kind of help then offer your bodies instead of your words.

ban_collector, /r/incels 17 Comments [3/14/2017 11:56:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125497

[On a screenshot of a radfem post calling people male supremacists for supporting fathers and mothers having equal parental rights]

This is further evidence that gender and women studies are pseudoscience and their top theories "the patriarchy", "wage gap" and "rape culture" are conspiracy theories. They not only double down but they triple down with their insanity. They should see a couple of wildlife documentaries and draw analogies which easily disproves the above claims (except for the last one).

It's ridiculous that this is taught at universities and has a major presence both in media and politics as if it had any factual merit.

Liberals against SJW's, Facebook 5 Comments [3/18/2017 2:52:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125457

The masculine American male is a dying breed. We have been told for far too long that violence is never the answer. We've been told that it's cruel to kill our own food. We've been conditioned to believe that there is no place in modern society for the man who refuses to shave his chest or wear skinny jeans. As a man...you are a protector. As a man...you are a provider. As a man...you are solely responsible for the safety and well being of your family. How can you be a good husband if you can't defend your wife? How can you be a good father if you can't protect your children? Remember...the eyes of the children are fixed upon you. You serve as an example of what young men should grow up to be...and of what young women should seek out in a partner. So...grow your beard, wear your boots, eat your steak, carry a knife, own a gun, protect your woman, fight for what is right and just. Be strong. Be of good courage. Long live the masculine American male.

Join our private group of masculine men: https://www.facebook.com/groups/liquorgunsbaconandtits/

Liquorgunsbaconandtits, Facebook 30 Comments [3/16/2017 8:39:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 125468

(How do Women have the Strength to Settle/ Fuck an Unattractive Guy??

Easy, they just do not make sex that big of a thing. I mean, for us males, they will act like it is and will support a whole culture around it. They will even cry rivers when someone would just joke about consent. But remember, its just an act. When the "I want new stuff from my fat manlet betabuck" will come, they would not hesitate. That's in economy 101.

freeboota, /r/incels 16 Comments [3/17/2017 6:07:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125610

One of the things I love about President Trump is the fact that Melania Trump is quiet, keeps to herself and isn't trying to force her way into making public policy.

It's a refreshing change from eight years of Michael Obama (not a typo).

Quiet, submissive wives for the win.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/6325100]

...

Now if President Trump can just tell his thot daughter Ivanka and her Jewboy husband to go pound sand, things would be perfect.

The two of them are squishes who want to compromise with the cucks and the lefties. They gotta go.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/6325135]

Matt Forney, Gab 10 Comments [3/21/2017 3:23:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 125454

It's almost like sex is a myth

We've all been living our lives in the hopes of some action, hearing about all of our friends exploits, reading about sexual acts that make the news, lending a shoulder whilst girls tell is about their tragic pump'n'dump by Chad.

But we've never seen it, never felt it, never had any tangible evidence that it even happens.

An existence as an incel is so far away from the typical human existence, I'm placed in utter shock every time i think about it.

tiajlmao, /r/incels 19 Comments [3/16/2017 8:37:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125352

I'm sorry but if I see a man who says he's a feminist, or even worse, an "intersectional feminist", I can only roll my eyes, smile and nod. Chances are good they just sit on twitter telling everyone to legalize prostitution.

I'm positive 99% of the men who actually do shit are too busy helping to build altars to their ego like that.

jose, Feminist Current 19 Comments [3/13/2017 7:58:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 125673

Wife has new co-worker and he is a 6,2 CHAD.......I have no chance ......life sucks

I went to her office today to say hi and I was ,et at the door by a 6'2 tan, muscular chiseled faced CHAD.....hell I wished I was gay for a second....this guy was insanely hot.......I caight my wife giggling att his guys jokes,,,,,,I went back to the car, looked in the mirror at my sad rat face and thinning hair and cried........my wife spend HOURS a a day working ALONE with this guy in a private office............The boss is only in the offic in the morning...........maybe I should just give up.......

Fuk, spend all my time avoiding CHAD and now he s working with my fucking wife....

Aigh, Godlike Productions 18 Comments [3/23/2017 4:58:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 125574

The Truth About Women In STEM

Over the weekend, I was treated to some truly hearty laughs when a group of computer programmers posted on GitHub the specifications of a feminist programming language. (It has since been removed and posted to bitbucket.) As a professional software developer and recreational critic of Social Justice Warriors, this article felt tailor-made to my interests. If either of those descriptions applies to you, feel free to check out the link above, it’s worth it.

“I wonder how long it would take an offended “feminist” to overreact to this article?” I thought. Turns out, not so long, as a feminist coder posted her response almost on cue, complete with “trigger warnings”, using the original post as 75% of her article content, the whole nine yards (check it out here).

Naturally, I was reminded about the infamous Adria Richards “Donglegate” incident, which has become somewhat legendary in the tech world, where a female employee of Sendgrid got two men fired because she overheard them making a joke about “dongles” in private at a conference. I couldn’t help but to think of Beavis and Butthead snickering and saying “huh huh, huh huh, she said dongles”. Crude? Maybe. Reason to lose employment? Absolutely not. And yet when “Donglegate” was all said and done, and Adria Richards got fired because sweet justice exists, the feminists and social justice warriors got the last laugh. For weeks, I saw Adria Richards on TV, playing the victim, distorting the story so hard that I was reminded of a famous Simpsons episode I saw on TV.

That was the Adria Richards coverage in a nutshell, and to someone who was not as invested in the story as I was (which is roughly 99% of people) it seems like another chapter in the long continuing narrative of “The evil ‘bro-grammer boys club of STEM fields that hates women and wants to make their life a living hell’”.

This narrative has always pissed me off because I can tell you firsthand that it is not true. In fact, in just about every aspect it has been the opposite. High schools, universities and employers try to fight so hard against the “boys club” stereotype that they end up giving women some rather unfair advantages. How do I know this? I graduated from one of the top science and engineering schools in the country.
College Years

When I was a college freshman in the Computer Science program, I immediately noticed that there were a lot more men than women. No biggie, people do what they like. I didn’t think much of it. It was widely accepted that computer science was one of the tougher majors in our university and students would routinely change majors when they started being overwhelmed by the incredibly demanding course load.

How demanding? During sophomore year my roommate and I pulled so many all-nighters that we inadvertently learned the rules of cricket (the cricket world championships were broadcast from halfway around the world, live, in the middle of the night, and it made for better background TV than infomercials.)

I first realized something was wrong when I got into trouble with the housing department of our school. My crime? Being a nerd hitting on the hottest girl in the dorms next to ours. Apparently, this was labelled as harassing behavior, and the only thing that saved me from being kicked out of on-campus housing was a friend of mine, who was an RA and member of some housing committees, vouching for me and promising everyone there that he would remedy the problem in private. Once again, I didn’t think much of it, we talked it out, and I was actually believing that what I did was wrong. But that’s a story for another time.

Some time later, I saw a student giving a tour to some high school kids, but then I noticed that the high schoolers were all girls, almost all of them wearing matching t-shirts. This was our state’s program to get more girls interested in science and math. Boy interested in science and math? You’re on your own there, buddy. The next year, it was touted as a success—many more girls enrolled in our schools science and math programs than they ever have. Except the numbers were still overwhelmingly male, I think the overall ratio moved by half a percent. I didn’t think much of it then.

As I progressed through my classes, I would see the same faces over and over again. By your senior year you will probably be in at least 1 group project, study group or circle with about 25% of your major by incoming class year. And while there were some brilliant, exceptionally bright and hard-working women, they were outnumbered by women who took the easiest duties in group projects and just coasted. How some of these girls ended up in Junior and Senior Level computer science classes at my school was a miracle. There were numerous instances where you would have to explain basic concepts to them. It blew my mind. And we encouraged them! We either took the harder group project roles because we did not want a bad grade, or we acted as complete supplicating chumps and ended up doing about 80% of these girls homework assignments thinking it would win us favors (it didn’t).

It’s not like the school had a shortage of resources to help them. Quite the opposite. There were several women’s organizations to help ensure the success of these ladies by helping them with tutoring, counseling, etc, for free. But these resources were often ignored in favor of the easy group projects and thirsty men.

There was a computer lab that stayed open all night. There were only 1-2 girls there pulling all-nighters at a time. But lots of dudes. Lots and lots of dudes. Because of the course load, people were dropping out left and right, but I can only recall one instance of a girl I knew dropping out, compared to the dozens of guys I knew.

And then came the job fairs. Because of my school’s prestige and reputation, many prominent companies and organizations recruited from our school. And you can guess what happened. All of the girls that coasted, all of the girls that cheated, “short cut” and gilded their way through college, ALL, without any exception, got job offers at these prestigious companies with those sweet high STEM salaries. I have known several guys that could not find work in their field while grinding hard for up to a year on the same exact prestigious degree. This was demoralizing. But, you know, male privilege.
More Examples.

“But maybe you’re just nitpicking and biased?” OK then, I will give you more examples from outside of my college career.

One of my friend’s girlfriend, on the surface, has a STEM career (computer software to be exact). If you google her name you will find several articles about her, talking about the challenges, hardships, and all the other bla bla bla that women face in computer science. The thing is, I am pretty sure this girl has never written a single line of code. And no, my friend is not dating Adria Richards. Companies are so desperate to employ and tout women, to be seen as that “progressive” company, that many create non-technical positions to fill that role, and then pat themselves on the back for it.

Another example: an ex-girlfriend, a hard science PhD, would routinely complain about the sexism at her job. As a caring and doting boyfriend, of course I took those things seriously, until I realized that the issues were not sexist – they were with her work. When you’re doing research-based academic work that kind of thing tends to happen. You are constantly under scrutiny, your bosses are people that haven’t been outside of academia for any parts of their lives, you get paid shit money, and it’s generally an unfriendly and unwelcoming environment. I realized this when I met more PhDs, male and female, from various fields. All of them had the same story. This girl mistook difficulty for sexism. Getting a PhD is so hard that there is a popular niche comic describing the rigors of professional academia (PhD Comics). Their humor won’t resonate with everyone, but every single PhD I know loves it.

So yes, STEM is indeed easier for women. Everyone wants then to succeed. Everyone needs them to succeed. No matter what the cost.

But you know who I respect the most? The grinders. The girls that work hard, the girls that learn, the girls that try to make a difference in the world on the same playing field as boys. Because, in reality, there is no sexism in science. In fact, there is no “-ism” in science. It’s a meritocracy, with knowledge and achievement as the main focus. And I can respect that.

This is exactly why the “bro” culture will persist. Science can not be held to the same politically correct standards as plain old office work. Because if I’m working with you at 4 am, fueled by pizza, mountain dew and cricket matches on TV, no matter who you are, man or woman, you’re gonna be my bro. Because that’s the only way anything will get done.

Dr Harry Longabaugh, Return of Kings 7 Comments [3/20/2017 1:43:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125452

Let’s face it: This generation of Incels is lost

We are in the worst place at the worst time in terms of relationships and sex. 50/60 years ago, the dating market was completely different from now. Sex was only allowed in marriage, people who had it outside of wedlock were shamed and punished. But then the sexual revolution happened. In theory, this should have been a great idea: Casual sex and sex outside of marriage are now accepted. People can enjoy it without any restrictions. But this had one flaw: Women don’t want sex. Sex is a resource for them they use to get what they want. So the demand for sex went higher, since men wanted to enjoy this casual sex but the supply stayed the same. Women were not interested in it, thus creating a power imbalance on the dating market in favour of women. Just like in a relationship, where the partner who cares less about the relationship has the most power.

Now this back 20/30 years this was not this bad since there where still some restrictions like limited options. You had your town/city maybe the neighbourhood town but the number of potential partners was small. Then technology began to make progress, the internet came and with it new forms of dating. Suddenly you just didn’t have a handful of people to choose from but the whole internet. Again, theoretically this should have benefited men and women. More options mean more chances to find the one for you. But now the power imbalance hit with full force. Without limitations, women could demand best men thanks to the power they had on the dating market. Instead to settle and lower their standards like they were forced to do back then, they could be as demanding as they wanted to and still find someone.

Now we are in the strange situation that the standards for men are still rising while the standards for female are dropping. Men get told they should go to the gym, get a good career, be better looking, be richer. On the other side, women get told even the 400 lbs landwhale is beautiful and deserve a fit and tall men. Thanks to the position of power females hold in the market, the chances are good she finds one. This creates a spiral in which the standards for men rise and rise while many men struggle to keep up with it or are left behind. Men are forced to go lower and lower to find relationships and sex making it even easier for women to date up, creating incels in the progress since we don’t have the option to date down.

And this is what I mean when I say we are in the worst place in the worst time. The market is dictated by females, creating even higher standards since nobody challenges their position of power. Men are like hamsters in their wheels trying to run faster to keep up with it, fuelling the female privilege even more. A downward spiral that creates incels, or simply men who can’t keep up with the rising standards.

As a summation, I encourage my fellow incels to stop the self-improvement. You are chasing standards that will get higher day by day, encouraging females to set the limits even higher since they can. Someone who comes here and says you have to improve means that you should bow to the standards female can set because they have the power in the market. Instead of following the demands of females, we should ask: What can we do shift the power in the market to men?

EconomicsofSex, /r/incels 19 Comments [3/16/2017 8:37:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125642

I passed by a group of Spanish teenage schoolgirls the other day. Normally when I pass by a group of such teens, whether German, Italian, Russian, French, hell even British, the girls – especially the pretty ones – will brush their hair with their hands as I walk past, expecting and hoping that I look at them. Every one of these Spanish girls gave me the ultra creep shaming look immediately I glanced in their direction. They looked about 16 too.

The only other country’s teens that I get almost guaranteed creep shamings from is the Dutch. It’s interesting that both those countries only a relatively short while ago had the most liberal (sane) laws and attitudes towards attraction to teenage girls, and both have been pressured into very rapidly adjusting their norms and laws into line with the likes of Britain and the USA. The Netherlands is now probably the most paedohysteric nation on Earth. All these Stinson Hunter type anti-paedo vigilante groups running amok in the UK are nothing as compared to what they’re like in Holland.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 12 Comments [3/22/2017 12:55:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 125354

The sad truth is, most men are vampires and will suck the life out of you.

sunsanunes , Feminist Current 28 Comments [3/13/2017 7:59:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 125562



Anonymous, Whisper 13 Comments [3/19/2017 4:53:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125597

Evolutionary psychology predicts that a man will love a woman he regularly has sex with, who lives with him and that he lives with and will be inclined to look after her welfare, which is not necessarily the same thing as doing what she wants. He will do what he thinks is good for her, and make her do what he thinks is good for her, even if she wants something different. Because one flesh. Taking care of her is taking care of her capacity to bear him children and raise his children.

It does not predict that she will love him all that much, since Gnon wants resources transferred from men to women, and from parents to children, but it does predict that she will obey him, respect him, and physically desire him, in order that he can take care of her and the children they have together.

That is how it supposed to work.

If, however, she is someone else’s wife, or is staying with her family rather the joining with him to form a new family, thus someone else is going to be looking after his kids by her, maybe the state is going to be taking care of her and he is just passing through, then evolutionary psychology predicts romantic love, that he will flatter her and do whatever she wants, no matter how foolish, unreasonable, and self destructive, as Lancelot treated Guinevere.

So, evolutionary psychology predicts that males will primarily experience romantic love in the case of adultery, and to a lesser extent in casual fornication. It predicts that they they will experience the love that a husband bears his wife after they have been living together and having sex for a while. And that women will tend to be at best good wives, rather than in love with their husbands. The wife who craves the seed of a man more alpha than her husband says

“I do not love my husband any more, therefore it is OK for me to service this rock musician and his biker roadies”

but women never love men all that much. They are not supposed to. They are supposed to respect, honor, obey, and desire their husbands.

Thus, the second mention of sexual love in the bible: Rebekah meets Isaac, explains herself. “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.” The first mention of sexual love in the bible on the other hand has love and romance preceding sex and marriage instead of following sex and marriage – and things go badly wrong.

Romantic love was celebrated by the troubadours, and as depicted by the troubadours, was always adulterous love. King Arthur’s wife Guinevere desired Lancelot, and had sex with him, and Lancelot romantically loved Guinevere, King Arthur’s wife. In consequence Lancelot does lots of stupid humiliating self sacrificing things that prove his enormous burning love, Guinevere acts like an arrogant depraved obnoxious spoiled slut bitch, the fellowship of the Round Table breaks up, Camelot is defeated, and everyone gets killed.

This makes sense for maximizing reproductive fitness. Crazy destructive passion in order to cuckold other men, calm, gentle, firm, nurturing affection for one’s own family. Romance is what the troubadours depicted with alarming accuracy.

Romance is defect/defect equilibrium. Lancelot believes he is sacrificing himself for Guineverein in a Christlike fashion, and the troubadours believed he was sacrificing himself for Guinevere in a Christlike fashion, but in fact he is maximizing his Darwinian genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else. Guinevere also behaves badly to both Lancelot and to her husband King Arthur because she is maximizing her genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else.

Guinevere and King Arthur are in a defect/cooperate relationship. King Arthur is cooperating with Guinevere, by looking after her, and cooperating with Lancelot, in that Lancelot gets benefits as a knight of the fellowship of the Round table, while Lancelot and Guinevere are defecting on King Arthur.

King Arthur, of course, finds out, and Camelot gets defect/defect. Everyone is much worse off, and Camelot falls. That is Romance.

Sexual love is a bad thing except inside the confines of marriage. Men are supposed to have sex first and love later, and women are not really supposed to love men all that much at all. Nowhere in the bible are we told of women loving their husbands, and Guinevere treats both Lancelot and King Arthur very badly. We are, however, fairly frequently told in the bible of women seeking the love of their husbands.

If a woman thinks she is love, she is lying to get some alpha cock. Perhaps lying to herself because all the books she reads and all the movies and television shows she watches tell her that romantic love justifies and purifies every kind of horrible bad behavior. In reality, women are never in love all that much, rather they experience desire for love and sex, which they confuse with love when they proceed to do bad things in pursuit of this desire. Rather than loving a man, a woman desires to be loved by a man. If a man is in romantically in love with a woman whom he is not living with and having regular sex with in his own bed, he is crazy or evil.

What is the Red Pill?

It is the practical and applied knowledge of the Dark Enlightenment, the bad news about how the world really is, and especially and particularly the bad news about the nature of women. The Dark Enlightenment is science and the Red Pill is engineering. There is a certain cynical ruthlessness about the Red Pill. You are told how to use it against other people, and how to protect yourself from other people. Much seemingly virtuous and altruistic behavior, like the behavior of Lancelot towards Guinevere, is revealed to be foolish or, more commonly, wicked and dangerous. Even virtue is reduced to pragmatic self interest – virtue is trying to get into and maintain cooperate/cooperate relationships – as distinct from pretending to virtue in order to get into defect/cooperate relationships. Also, virtue is developing one’s own excellence, as for example lifting iron, or perfecting social skills.

What is the Blue Pill?

It is the official truth about the way the world supposedly works, and particularly and especially the official truth about the nature of women. If women were really the way that the blue pill says they are, then the behaving towards women the way that progressives say you are supposed to behave would work. Unfortunately, the way you are supposed to behave fails, and fails horribly badly with utterly disastrous consequences.

What is the Purple Pill?

It is an attempt to reconcile Red Pill truths with Blue pill morals: “Not All Women are Like That”. It is an attempt to avoid the most grossly self destructive behavior commanded by the Blue Pill, while still accepting that Blue Pill behavior is wise and virtuous behavior, rather than foolish, destructive, self destructive, and evil behavior. It is an attempt to reconcile with reality while remaining virtuous as Blue Pillers see virtue. But Blue Pill “virtues” are like Lancelot’s love for Guinevere: They are evil in themselves, and manifestations of evil. It was wrong for Lancelot to love Guinevere, as much wrong as it was wrong for Guinevere to have sex with Lancelot. Not only is it unwise to be the equal of your wife, it is also wicked. It is your job to supervise and discipline your wife, and some women, not all of them, not most of them, but quite a lot of them, sometimes need to be physical disciplined. You are wicked if you are not prepared to physically discipline your wife and your children in the unfortunate case that the necessity should occur.

What is the Black Pill?

The Black Pill is despair at the sad and cynical truths of the Red Pill, and the belief that we are doomed, that we as individuals shall not know a good sexual and family relationship, that we shall have few or no great grandchildren, that our race shall perish, that our homelands will be flooded by hostile angry sullen low IQ aliens who live on crime, welfare, and voting for the left, who get violent at microaggressions, that our civilization will die, overrun like Detroit and Salisbury by savages incapable of operating civilization.

What is the White Pill?

Deus Vult: That we will be victorious. That those of us that are lucky and strong will create proper families, that we will have love and grandchildren, that we will save our civilization and conquer the enemies of our civilization. That the able will rule over their inferiors, and men will rule over women, as is right for us to do.

Jim, Jim's Blog 11 Comments [3/21/2017 3:18:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125467

How do Women have the Strength to Settle/ Fuck an Unattractive Guy??

The must REALLY LOVE Money to do so. LOL.

jackville07, /r/incels 7 Comments [3/18/2017 4:06:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125575

If women want to be seen as individuals they should start acting like individuals.

Currently, they pretty much all find the exact same men as attractive and the exact same men unattractive physically, personality wise, it's the same. While men find many personality types attractive women act as a hivemind finding the same personality type attractive (extroverted, assertive, no insecurities at all, etc.)

This backs up the fact women don't act like individuals too.

kllme555, /r/incels 7 Comments [3/21/2017 2:23:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125576

Many bloggers have theorized that men and women have different value in the sexual market place relative to age. This concept is commonly referred to as "sexual market value."

Under this theory, a woman's sexual value is highest from age 18 until about 27 years old. As a woman ages into her 30s and 40s, her sexual market begins to rapidly decline as she ages. In contrast, a man's sexual market value is lowest in his teens and twenties, and then gradually increases as he ages. A man's sexual market value does not peak until he hits approximately 36 years old. As men age into their 40s, the decline is much less rapid than women, in contrast to a woman's more rapid decline. The practical affect is that women stand the best chance of mating with a male whose value is high early in life, while men stand the best chance of mating with a woman whose value is high later in life.

Some have suggested that modern society, which pushes women into traditional careers, is not compatible with the reality of the sexual market value.[1]. By the time American women have graduated college and become established in their career, many are too old to bear children absent serious health risks.[2]. Notably, scientific studies have concluded that women are racing against a biological clock, as having children past the age of 35 is a serious risk.[3]. However, men can have children well into their 40s and 50s. [4]. This would seem to suggest that from an evolutionary, cultural, and biological standpoint, women benefit by bearing children earlier in life, while men benefit by bearing children later in life.

Rollo notes:

Now class, please address your attention to the critical 15-16 year span between a woman’s peak SMV and that of men’s. It should come as no surprise that this span is generally the most socially tumultuous between the sexes. The majority of first marriages take place here, single-motherhood takes place here, advanced degrees, career establishments, hitting the Wall, and many other significant life events occur in this life stage. So it is with a profound sense of importance that we understand the SMV context, and the SMP’s influence as prescribed to each sexes experience during this period.

At age 30 men are just beginning to manifest some proto-awareness of their sexual value, while simultaneously women are becoming painfully aware of their marked inability to compete with their sexual competitors indefinitely. This is the point of comparative SMV: when both sexes are situationally at about the same level of valuation (5). The conflict in this is that men are just beginning to realize their potential while women must struggle with the declination of their own.

This is the primary phase during which women must cash in their biological chips in the hope that the best men they can invest their hypergamy with will not be so aware of their innate SMV potential that they would choose a younger woman (22-24) during her peak phase over her. . . .

The confluence between both sexes’ comparative SMV is perhaps the most critical stage of life for feminine hypergamy. She must be able to keep him ignorant of his SMV potential long enough to optimize her hypergamy. In men’s case, his imperative is to awaken to his SMV (or his potential of it) before he has made life-altering decisions based on a lack understanding his potential.

Every man who I’ve ever known to tell me how he wished he’d known of the manosphere or read my writing before getting married or ‘accidentally’ knocking up his BPD girlfriend has his regret rooted in not making this SMV awareness connection. They tended to value women more greatly than their own potential for a later realized SMV peak – or they never realized that peak due to not making this awareness connection.


Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 5 Comments [3/21/2017 2:23:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125602

In many failed marriages, the wife refused to lead the family. A husband tries to lead his wife, but if she won't be led then the children won't march properly. Children won't obey their father with a pure heart if the mother is against the father. All across America today there are rebellious wives who won't be led. The husband gets upset and argues with his wife most of the time because she won't do as he tells her. She makes excuses and accuses him of picking on her. She is a slackard, half-stepping her duties and lying often in an attempt to avoid being rebuked by her husband. If he doesn't rebuke her, then who will? You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make her drink it.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 3 Comments [3/21/2017 3:21:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125410

Travelling as an Incel makes ZERO Sense

I have travelled a lot in the past 4 years and let me tell you EVERY single time I step into my destination my heart starts fluttering at all the couples around whilst Im alone with no one.

Its difficult to enjoy a vacation when you realise how unwanted u are and how everyone else around u has someone. Well not everyone, I should say almost EVERY woman around u has at least a decent looking guy. And I have noticed a lot of women with men much better looking and taller than they are.

A few lonely guys u notice are really short or below average in looks.

Being an incel kills ur joy in travelling. If I was a single Chad, I wud be travelling all the time...........

jackville07, /r/incels 23 Comments [3/15/2017 7:28:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125404

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerdlord View Post
Men and women are not wired the same. Evolution dictates that a woman take the safest approach to life in order to protect and nurture offspring long term. Men are programmed to take as much risk as possible in order to impregnate the highest number of females possible.

This raises an interesting point. In today's society we actively fight against our evolutionary hardwiring. A "strong woman" is seen as a woman who acts like a man and rejects her more feminine and nurturing instincts. We consider a well adjusted, modern man as someone who rejects or suppresses his masculine instincts to get in touch with his "feminine side".

If a woman earns more, often she will work and the man will stay home and care for the kids. Regardless of the fact that a woman would be naturally and instinctively better at child care than a man would. That's not an insult and it's certainly not true in ALL cases, but in the majority of them, it is.

Our differences complement each other. Why fight against them? Why treat a woman as a failure if she is inclined to be a mother and care for her kids at home?

We may THINK we've evolved beyond this or we are more "enlightened" nowadays but these hardwired instincts still inform everything we do, many times subconsciously.

It's why women are often attracted to jerks and why men are attracted to youth and beauty and often turned off by aggressive women who act like men.

This programming is thousands and thousands of years old. It isn't going to be overwritten in less than a hundred years. We can TRY but it ends up coming out sideways anyway.

Voiceofreazon, City-Data 9 Comments [3/15/2017 4:51:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125283

[The two quotes are unreleated but immediately successive, might as well save space]

These ads depicting the male as inferior, and the fact that women demand this, just show how untalented and morally childlike most women are.

Men simply have no desire to see women portrayed negatively, or as even more inferior than they really are.

But women crave this. This is huge evidence of their untalented and morally stunted nature.

...

“What a bitch. She’s betraying her husband, hurting his business, and hurting herself in the process.”

Since when do women connect even the simplest cause and effect?

Anon, Dalrock 3 Comments [3/10/2017 12:30:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125628

They want you to buy into the scam feminism and liberals have set up. So society can crash and be rebuilt up better the way they want it. Although a lot are just idiots who think anything goes will last forever. Neither of which will ever work out. Most dumb fuck liberals think they can just fuck the system forever and men will churn on. All it takes is for 10% of males to say "YA KNOW WHAT, FUCK THIS SHIT" and give up or seek justice.

Cunts don't give a fuck. They are too stupid to see 5 foot in front of them. Cunts are just gluttons for chad cock and beta bux. They think they can have it all forever with no consequences. They think betas and omegas will simply take this shit forever. They are very wrong.

Cunts have no concept of morality or justice or anything good at all. They are just parasitic & retarded children who will drain their host until it croaks. They are incapable of rational thought or positivity. They merely pretend to be those things just as they dress themselves up like angels with makeup and pretty clothes. Its all illusion. In reality females are demons in the flesh. Thus they deserve no rights of any kind.

The second female sexual desires matter your civilization begins to rot. It takes a while but every time it goes under. Thats why there are no matriarchies or history of females ruling a country in any way. Because the second they do they fuck it all up and bow down begging for that foreign alpha cock. Lots of suffering comes for everyone else when a nation falls. Which females don't give a fuck about. They love being conquered by other nations with brutal men and getting fucked by those men.

Female humanoid organisms are just worthless pieces of shit. They don't deserve any god damn rights. They don't deserve anything positive. Fucking pieces of shit. I could never feel sympathy for those parasitic shit lords. Females deserve to be treated lesser than shit as their inner quality exists as lower than shit.

livinginhell101, /r/incels 11 Comments [3/22/2017 7:12:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125633

I find it impossible to be happy for people in relationships...

I find myself resenting all normies whatsoever with a burning passion. Whenever I see a happy couple, I pray with all of my heart that they break up and spend the rest of their lives alone. I want to see them suffer, I want their happiness to crumble as my hopes and dreams did years ago.

I wish they'd all die, every last PDA-engaging, love-stricken one of them. My blood boils at the thought of their very existence.

Minjaze, /r/incels 15 Comments [3/22/2017 8:32:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125458



Same woman, two different men. Ciara's two most recent relationships are a perfect example of how your choice of a mate affects your life. A woman is by nature a help mate so she is capable, many times unconsciously, of taking on the mindset and lifestyle of the man she is with. This is why it is so absolutely vital for a woman to know her worth and make the wisest choice in her mate. You don't date or accept the proposal of the guy who is on the level you are or going places you don't want to go. You accept the proposal from the guy who can lead you to where you want to be. Whether you realize it or not that man is leading you somewhere. Find out where he is going before you get on board. If he was deceptive and made you think he was going somewhere he wasn't, get off the ride and go back home!!!! #Awaken #Arise #ChooseWisely #KnowYourWorth #WaitOnHim

Queen-Wisdom Grant Pamela, Facebook 10 Comments [3/16/2017 8:39:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 125572

Game denialism is the act of denying that game works. Feminists, white knights, incels and some White Nationalists are examples of game denialists.

Arguments

A common game denialist argument is that the only reason men who apply game techniques are able to get laid, is that they are doing a lot of approaches and therefore are succeeding at a numbers game.[1]

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 6 Comments [3/20/2017 1:42:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125569

This month, someone made a donation to Planned Parenthood in Republican State Senator Steve Fitzgerald’s name ? and the Kansas lawmaker was not happy about it.

On March 10, Planned Parenthood’s Great Plains clinic tweeted out a photo of a letter Sen. Fitzgerald wrote to the women’s health organization. “It is with great dismay that I received your letter that a donation was made in my ‘honor’ to your heinous organization,” Sen. Fitzgerald wrote.

The state senator went on to liken Planned Parenthood ? an international nonprofit organization that provides healthcare to millions of women and men ? to a Nazi concentration camp.

“This is as bad ? or worse ? as having one’s name associated with Dachau,” Sen. Fitzgerald wrote, referring to the first Nazi concentration camp created in 1933. “Shame on your organization and shame on anyone that would attempt to blacken my name in this manner.”

In an interview with The Kansas City Star on Monday, Sen. Fitzgerald stood by his original comments.

“It was either send them that or ignore it,” Sen. Fitzgerald told The Star. “I figured, I don’t want my name associated as a donation to Planned Parenthood, in my name, to go on un-denounced by me.”

When asked if Sen. Fitzgerald was implying that Planned Parenthood is actually worse than the Nazis, the state senator replied: “Oh, yeah,” adding that the Nazis “ought to be incensed by the comparison.”

Many Twitter users were understandably very upset with Sen. Fitzgerald’s comments.

[Tweets removed by submitter]

Spokesperson for Planned Parenthood Great Plains told The Star that they’ve see an uptick in donations in Sen. Fitzgerald’s name since they tweeted his letter.

“It’s this kind of inflammatory language that adds to the shame and stigma of safe legal abortion,” Lee-Gilmore said. “The state of Kansas has much bigger issues to be dealing with, and this is just an unacceptable attack on women’s right to choose.”

Steve Fitzgerald, Huffington Post 5 Comments [3/20/2017 1:17:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125601

The blame for the mess in America is mostly the man's fault in my opinion. God created man to take charge and lead. When REAL men falter and become scarce in number, then women and homosexuals easily rise to power. We have bratty children running the nation these days. Any reminisce of genuine and respectable men of honor, character and integrity is long gone. I place the primary blame upon husbands and fathers because we are the one's whom God left in charge of everything.

Let me clarify, I believe that most marriage failures are the woman's fault. God created man and gave him work to do; but the wife's work is her husband. If a woman fails as a wife, then she has failed at her life's work in God's eyes. Therefore, and in view of 1sr Peter 3:1, I firmly believe that women are mostly to blame when divorce happens. In fact, it's women who file for divorce at more than TWICE the rate of men in America.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 6 Comments [3/21/2017 3:19:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 125244

See, that’s what I said, when I started seeing how insane other women behaved as a young girl. My determination to not be a psychotic cuntbucket continues to serve me well to this day.

I celebrated it by doing something transgressive to these collective craycraybaskets. I spent time with my husband, and we made our children happy and had lovely family time.

Actually, I forgot about the women’s day thing, because it’s not something that matters.


Shadowdancer Duskstar / Cutelildrow, The Liberty Zone 15 Comments [3/9/2017 3:04:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 125393

i used to be entirely ambivalent to misandry, but i am now 100% in favor of misandry.

let me explain: my mom almost got attacked by a sexual predator on a tour in new orleans because he made her feel guilty about distrusting him. he shamed her for not trusting a complete stranger and made up a fake daughter to make her feel safer around him. and this wasn’t a long time ago, it was last summer! my mom could have been killed because she was guilted into trusting an actual rapist.
she only found out because they ran into one of his victims, who risked her job to warn a couple on the tour to get my mom away from him. you matter more than some man’s feelings. if you feel unsafe around a man, you trust your gut and if he makes you feel guilty for it you run the fuck away.
if men are using your innate distrust of strangers to manipulate you into doing dangerous shit then distrusting them is a necessity. there are men i know who are amazing, caring people. but the evil ones out there are learning to act like them just so they can hurt you. a good man will understand this and realize why you’re nervous.
do you think the man who ended up saving my mom got offended that my mom initially distrusted that predator because he was a man she didn’t know?? no. he told her to follow her gut next time and made sure she got back to her hotel safely. good men don’t get offended that women distrust bad men.

For the sake of sanity, you should have stayed away from misandry.
Ah, misandry because of personal experience. As if that validates the hatred of half the world’s population. I’m sorry that happened to your mother, but it’s not like a bad experience someone had from an individual justifies generalizing an entire group of people that shares that person’s sex, race, whatever. You don’t even need to be a misandrist. Most people don’t trust complete strangers anyway.

“ if men are using your innate distrust of strangers to manipulate you into doing dangerous shit then distrusting them is a necessity.” Automatically, distrusting men solely because of the bad apples isn’t a necessity: it’s discriminating against the majority of men based on the minority. It’s no different from automatically distrusting a black person because they might be a thief or a thug, but they’re being judged because of an arbitrary factor like skin colour. I get the feeling that you’re citing that you know “amazing, caring men” after going on a spree about how women need to distrust men to justify being a misandrist. A good man won’t understand why he and other men are being lumped in and distrusted based on the actions of men that they have nothing to do with, and he will realize that it’s not a sensible position of yours to hold.


first off, i was insane when i didn’t support misandry too. i’ve had ptsd most of my life because i was first sexually assaulted at age 4 and have been exposed to abuse ever since. men have been systematically destroying my sanity for 19 years, i think i’m entitled to mistrust them considering i now have literally 15 mental illnesses from abuse and cannot risk backtracking because i may literally die. men and boys did this to me, i genuinely have no choice in this.
and also, i have been abused by women but nobody ever blames ME for my abuse when the perpetrator was a woman. funny how that works. i’m expected to just deal with being abused by men and forgive them for it but i’m allowed to be mad and hold a grudge when a woman hurts me. even when it’s the same fucking thing! i’ve had two stalkers, one a man and one a woman and guess which one i get blamed for? go on guess. THE FUCKING MAN. i get blamed for a man choosing to stalk me.
what exactly harms men i personally distrust? it’s not like i’m shooting them or stabbing them, i’m just not talking to them or going places alone with them or having sex with them. i don’t see how that’s bad. there are plenty of people who don’t talk to me or hang out alone with me or have sex with me and it doesn’t hurt me in the slightest because i don’t expect that out of everyone i meet. some people don’t wanna know you, who cares? men are way too sensitive about people not wanting to hang out with them or fuck them. just chill out.
plus, my distrust of men is validated by crime statistics, not just personal experience. distrusting black people isn’t. i don’t even actually distrust men of color the way i distrust white men because they are not logically a threat to me. my distrust of men is 100% logical as a survivor of numerous sexual assaults. i’ve talked to all of my therapists and psychologists about this and none of them have said it’s unhealthy to distrust men while i’m still recovering soooooo honestly i don’t care. and i’m never gonna care. i need to focus my energy on not backtracking because, again, i could die and now that i’m on the right combo of meds for my past experiences i actually don’t want to. so honestly if it keeps me from getting hurt i’m gonna fucking do it no matter what some stranger thinks. sorry not sorry.

Florianesque, tumblr 11 Comments [3/14/2017 10:16:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 125322

If You did Not Enjoy Women in Your Youth then You got a RAW DEAL

Study hard, when ur 30 and successful all the women will finally mature and chase u since u will be a rich doctor. Dont worry All those chads will be working at a gas station at 30. Ur time will come. There is someone for everyone.
Am I supposed to feel happy that I studied and worked my ass off (with ZERO help from ANYONE) from 13-30 without love,sex and intimacy and without enjoying a woman in her PRIME and BEST years. I must now accept a lower paying less educated woman who is past her prime and less attractive with sagging skin and stretch marks and who was a cum bucket for tons of chads for 17 years and be grateful and happy with that??? Why should men even live if we are given such a raw deal in life?? Totally unfair and cruel if u ask me.

jackville07, /r/incels 16 Comments [3/14/2017 3:49:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 125388

There is NO point on love, relationships, infatuation or anything

To be honest I don't see why the fuck are humans capable of love or infatuation when it only leads to suffering if you are not a top male.

you will ALWAYS be tossed aside as soon as a better male appears in the vicinity. There is no point if you are not a male model or at least good looking with GREAT charisma. Just no point.

I had a girl who I liked (not love, but really liked). We had a really really strong freindship and later a bit of more than friends stuff (no, this is not a brag). Our bond and friendship was very strong. Just one day, a guy with similar looks level but more charisma appeared and it all went to shit really quickly with me being left apart for that guy.

Even in freindhsip you will be tossed apart as soon as a better male appears. It isnt worth it anymore. Im living alone all my life without partner, because I don't want to have the constant fear and shadow of another better male appearing in the vicinity and ruining everything.

Its always like this, not only in my story, i saw lots of times this happen to other people too.

If you can be one upped by another male, DONT EVER enter a relationship, DONT EVER have meaningful friendships, DONT EVER let yourself become infatuated, ERASE all feelings because they are pointless.

8+/10 in looks or 7+/10 in loosk+great charimsa OR DEATH

Zyrros, /r/incels 7 Comments [3/14/2017 11:56:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125699

Don’t ask me why but the other day I had the urge to watch the little guy in Different Strokes saying ‘Watcha talking about Willis?’.

First video that came up, gave me a surprise in the first 3 seconds : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le6qeMe7-vM

Don’t know the context of that episode, but ‘Kimberly’ must be no more than 13 years old in it, and judging from the ‘whoas’ from the studio audience, obviously the producers hand picked a crowd of ‘ephebophiles’ (or hebophiles?) to watch the show that day.

Or maybe just 20 years ago, even in the USA, NOBODY thought it was unusual or perverted to find an early adolescent girl attractive.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 6 Comments [3/24/2017 5:21:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 125665

On Tuesday, the Oklahoma House met to discuss engrossment of its controversial House Bill-1549, which would prohibit anyone from seeking an abortion in the case of a genetic abnormality.

Oklahoma State Rep. Cory Williams (D) asked Rep. George Faught — who authored the bill — if rape is the “will of God.”

“Well, you know, if you read the Bible, there’s actually a couple circumstances where that happened,” Faught began. “The Lord uses all circumstances. I mean, you can go down that path, but it’s a reality unfortunately,” he said.

Williams followed up, asking if incest is the “will of God.”

“Same answer. Doesn’t deal with this bill,” Faught said. Williams argued that the questions matter to the legislation, given that Faught was unwilling to make exceptions in the case of rape or incest. “You are proffering a divine intervention as the reason why you won’t do that and so I think it is very important.”

“This body wants to know — and myself personally — whether you believe rape and incest are actually the will of God,” Williams questioned.

“It’s a great question to ask,” said Faught. “And, obviously if it happens in someone’s life, it may not be the best thing that ever happened, but — so you’re saying that God is not sovereign with every activity that happens in someone’s life and can’t use anything and everything in someone’s life and I disagree with that.”

George Faught, Raw Story 10 Comments [3/23/2017 2:07:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125582

[Seriously I kinda wonder why this guy was a PUA in the first place]

Other effects of low T on a nation’s men:

leftist politics
vocal fry
uptalk
esssra klein
manboobs
john scalzi
beta orbiting
grinding incel
male feminists
experimental homosexuality
bad taste in, well, everything
androgyny in look and attitude
cuckoldry and miscegenation
marathon running
carbface
interracial adoption
anti-trumpism
open borders
antifa
vidgya gaming-induced deep vein thrombosis
protruding nipples (very disrespectful)
anal play and anal play accessories
math class is hard
intersectionality
shia lapoofter
fake news
NPR
tranny “rights”
butt-kicking babes
equalism
haven monahan (and other fake rape fantasies)
patton oswalt
talmudic sophistry
barack obama
hypocrisy
disloyalty
snark
censorship
literal bending over backwards for invading hordes of higher fertility ingrates
social justice posturing
“toxic masculinity” (the irony)

As you can see, chronically low T on both the individual and societal level is almost entirely downside. Bullying decreases. Maybe you could call that an upside. I wouldn’t.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 20 Comments [3/21/2017 2:24:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 125391

If you haven't lose your virginity by 21 it's over just stop.

If you ever have the opportunity to look through a girls phone or iPad it will redpill you more than anything ever could.

The amount of options and men hitting on them women have is insane. I won't go into details but I recently looked though a 6's stuff and it's literally insane.

Any woman worth dating will have 100s of dudes after them by 21. Even if you somehow managed to get with one being a virgin the difference in the power dynamic is too much to overcome. She has hundreds of options one text message away. You have zero.

Deane_, /r/incels 16 Comments [3/14/2017 11:56:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125402

You question why a man earning money for his family is vital for their respect and yet say you thought, at the time, that it was your husband's fault that you were in rough financial shape. It seems like your story is a case study as to why men should be the bread winners: it is very difficult for a wife to respect a man who performs the womanly role (likely poorly) of managing a household and taking care of children.

The reality is that for the vast majority of human history, romantic marriages have been the exception, not the norm. You might love your husband as a person. That makes sense, as you likely chose each other but I'm going to hazard a guess that you had the luxury to not have an arranged or very early (think: a 21 year and an 18 year old getting married after 3 months of closely chaperoned dating) marriage. For the other 95% of humanity, marriages have been economic arrangements primarily and personal arrangements eventually.

I'm happy to talk to you and have my theories and beliefs disproved and challenged, otherwise I wouldn't be here myself.

RP student , Reddit 11 Comments [3/14/2017 10:27:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 125239

(Submitter note: These are excerpts taken from an argument about a fanfic trope called "omegaverse," in which some male characters may go into heat and be able to become pregnant. The runner/s of this blog believe this is inherently homophobic and transphobic, and gets rather Tumblrina about it. There's plenty more at the source)

the homophobic stereotypes in the lines of “gay men always think of sex” isn’t a new thought. it’s been with us for decades. the lgbt community has tried to work against this stereotype for decades. it’s a battle we still fight today, and one we still are losing constantly because homophobes continue to lable gay men as sex crazed monsters only thinking about sex.

creating content where men in a m/m relationship are so influenced by their “heat cycle” that they cannot stop themselves from having sex – or if they can, can’t stop thinking of sex, even if they’re far distanced away from a sexual situation – comes, directly, from this stereotype. you, a non-mlm writing about men in m/m relationship, having gay sex in this way, it is directly drawing from these stereotypes.

it doesn’t matter if your fanfics doesn’t contain non-con (though many fanfics in the omegaverse circles do). you, a non-mlm describing men in m/m relationships still benefits from this homophobia. this kind of homophobia will never affect you, and thus, creating content for it is you benefitting from this homophobic view of gay men. and for what? so you can enjoy a sex scene? is it worth it?

and i’m sure you’re not a transphobe, but again, omegaverse a trope was created due to transphobia. it was created because cis people would rather see a cis man get pregnant through his (self lubricating) anal, rather than think of trans men being a part of their precious gay smut. it draws from the transphobic view that trans men (women) are not real men (women), and only real gay sex is between two cis men.

you may not have transphobic ideas when you write omegaverse, but you still create content which was thought up due to transphobic views. you’re not a trans man, and thus, if you create content where you would rather have a self lubricating anal rather than toy with the idea that there are self lubricating trans men out there who are okay with vaginal sex, you are benefitting from transphobia. your content is a product of this transphobia. even if you don’t write “transphobic” content yourself. even if you toy with trans people in your omegaverse fanfics. omegaverse cannot excist if transphobia is removed.

thewoesofyaoi, Tumblr 9 Comments [3/14/2017 3:42:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 125266

A Canadian judge who asked a sexual assault complainant why she could not "keep your knees together" is resigning.

Alberta Federal Court Justice Robin Camp's decision came after a scathing Canadian Judicial Council review called for his removal.

The review concluded he acted in a manner that seriously undermined public confidence in the judiciary.

The federal justice minister has accepted his resignation.

Mr Camp's comments made during a 2014 rape trial sparked outrage and drew sharp criticism from sexual assault victims and their advocates.

The judge had tried to hold on to his position and told the Council he had undergone education and had apologised for his comments.

The Council, which oversees the judiciary, found that Mr Camp's actions during the trial were "so manifestly and profoundly destructive of the concept of impartiality, integrity and independence of the judicial role that public confidence is sufficiently undermined to render the Judge incapable of executing the judicial office".

It also found he spoke to the complainant in a manner "that was at times condescending, humiliating and disrespectful".

Federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould said on Thursday she is confident Mr Camp received due process in his disciplinary review and accepts his decision to step down as of 10 March.

"Sexual assault and gender-based violence is in no form acceptable and we will continue to stand up for victims," she said.

In the 2014 case, he asked a 19-year-old woman: "Why couldn't you just keep your knees together?"

He also said, "pain and sex sometimes go together" and had referred to the complainant as "the accused," court records show.

Robin Camp, BBC News 0 Comments [3/14/2017 3:45:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 125451

Open letter to the women in my life.

Why don't you like me?

Why don't you talk to me the same way you talk to every other guy? Whenever I've tried to make small talk, you stare away, or don't seem interested, or make an excuse to leave.

I just want to know. I want to know what it is I can do. Or is it something out of my control, like I'm not handsome enough? Not tall enough? Maybe I just give off a weird, uncontrollable vibe.

All of my male friends have girlfriends. I have no one. It makes me feel like a loser.

I just want to know what's wrong with me. What makes me different from my friends.

I remember being 18 and asking the internet how to get a girlfriend. Everybody told me, "you're young. It'll happen eventually."

That was 10 years ago.

Oh well, no sense in wallowing. I'll probably never get an answer as to why you don't like me, but at least this letter was somewhat cathartic.

andiswearrrr, /r/incels 15 Comments [3/16/2017 8:37:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125557

Game is the sum tools meant to increase a man's sexual worth,[1] or any technique a man uses to better attract women. It is one of the preeminent topics discussed at Roosh V Forum and Return of Kings. Feminists have branded game as "manipulative", while the men who practice game uphold it as a form of self-improvement and a path to better sexual success. "Gaming" a girl refers to actively using game techniques to attract her. Roissy describes game as "The practice of challenging women."

How Game spreads and evolves

Game spreads and evolves as men share their techniques, experiences, and observations of women with each other. Other men then test and report back on this input, creating a continually evolving consensus. This process accelerated with the Internet, which allows men to share instantly.

Denial

Game denial is a rejection of the techniques with which men are reporting success, in favor of techniques that men are reporting as failures.

Since Game deniers have little if any real support for their positions, they almost always resort to unfounded attacks on the consensus group.

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 2 Comments [3/19/2017 4:04:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125630

" "Leave it to some dyke who calls herself “Marcus” to come gurgling the same bullshit we’ve all come to expect."

Have you ever heard of Marcus Aurelius? It’s a play on his name because I admire his philosophy, supergenius. And have you ever read any of my previous comments? Apparently not, because if you had, you’d know that I’ve never spouted any bullshit, nor towed any party lines. Nice ad hominem attack, though."

Oh no, I’ve never heard of Marcus Aurelius. Your oh-so-clever little wordplay totally escaped my notice. NOT!

You are a woman who models herself on a Roman philosopher, which is absurd. Do you know the origin of the word “virtue?” Do you think Aurelius would have seen some spoiled American woman with an inflated ego as the rightful heir to his ideas?

Pietas dictates that you should shut up in the presence of men and take your place as a woman. Or did you miss that part? How convenient, and how typically female to overlook the fundamentals…

Your presumptuous defilement of ancient, received wisdom only underscores the folly of attempting to give women equal status in the realm of thought.

Welmer, Chateau Heartiste 3 Comments [3/22/2017 8:31:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 125631

" " You are a woman who models herself on a Roman philosopher, which is absurd. Do you know the origin of the word “virtue?” "

Why yes, yes I do. Do you think moral excellence is something of which only men are capable?"

Without guidance from authority, yes.

" If he lived today, yes, of course he’d see women as heirs to his ideas. He can be excused as being a product of his time; what’s your excuse?"

You think Aurelius needs you to excuse him? How presumptuous…

" Why is your sense of manhood so shaken by the fact that I can change a tire or chop some wood, if it’s required of me? Being able to do those things doesn’t preclude me also being able to cook or nurture my family, or wear a dress and be demure."

Seriously, how many women who say they can do this actually can? I think it’s a self-indulgent fantasy in 95+ percent of cases.

BTW, your typical dyke who can do these things is NOT capable of being “demure.” Don’t you get it? Some things are masculine, and some feminine.

" The fact of the (original) matter is this: if you should ever reproduce, the chances are good that you are going to occasionally be called upon to carry your infant offspring, whether you like it or not. If you think that using a practical tool for that purpose makes you less of a man, then don’t use that tool. If you think that occasionally carrying your own infant or changing the occasional diaper makes you less of a man, then perhaps you’re not really father material."



You haven’t read my earlier posts, eh? I’ve changed more diapers and taken care of babies far more than I ever expected. I have carried my children, cooked for them, bathed them, changed them and put them to bed countless times — far from “occasionally.” All without help from a woman.

All of that work made me pretty competent at doing so, but it certainly didn’t come naturally to me, as it does for women. The same goes for women who work on cars or fix things around the house: they can learn, but it’s easier for a man.

I am angry at women like you because you are too thick to understand that simple truth, and continue to force your idiotic ideas that men and women are equally capable at all tasks down our throats. I grew up with that “Free to Be… You and Me” crap, and I despise it.

Welmer, Chateau Heartiste 3 Comments [3/22/2017 8:31:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 125632

" No hidden agenda. I say that if I prove myself capable of doing the same labor, why should it bother you if I do? That is not a claim that all women are capable of it, nor that the scale should be made to slide on the behalf of those who aren’t capable."

Bullshit. There is definitely an agenda. You haven’t proven anything — you’re just making arguments like the typical feminist you are.

You say you want “equality” and then next thing we know women are laying claim to their husbands’ life essence by using biased, feminist laws such as VAWA. They are claiming “discrimination” to get into jobs they shouldn’t be in. Why, that pull-up test was sexist! I wouldn’t have crashed that fighter plane if those men hadn’t made me feel insecure. If only the Army developed bionic tampons, I could haul 100lb. packs up the mountains of Afghanistan! Etc., etc.

So you can chop wood and change tires? Post a verifiable picture of yourself doing so and let the men here see for themselves how “demure” and feminine you are.

Nothing turns guys on like a sweaty, thick-armed, heavy-handed woman wielding a wrench or an ax…

So sexy, baby.

Bet you like to be on top, no?

[Submitter's note: >he doesn't enjoy cowgirl]

Welmer, Chateau Heartiste 10 Comments [3/22/2017 8:32:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 125389

It all boils down to two undeniable facts that normies can't accept...

1) The girl does the choosing.

If she likes you enough, she will let you know one way or the other. Trying to proceed without getting chosen is called harassment. This is why approaching is useless (unless you're exceptionally attractive, and the bad news is this doesn't apply to any of us).

And the reason that most of us are here (and arguably the single biggest reason the term "incel" exists in the first place)...

2) You need to be PHYSICALLY attractive enough to get chosen.

Talking about grooming, personality, confidence or attitude all flies out the window in the face of these two impassable facts. Now, I'll admit that once you've been deemed attractive, these things start to matter, but trying to talk about them beforehand is an exercise in futility.

Enough said.

genetic_scrap, /r/incels 14 Comments [3/14/2017 11:56:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125698

Forty years old and getting nowhere in your attempts to bang legal age teenage girls? PUA Deepak ‘Devirginizer’ Wayne will diagnose your problems and put them right so you can be smashing sweet sixteen year old sugar walls before you know it! Of course, Deepak is not exactly without controversy in the PUA community, but one thing you can say is he’s no paedocrite (not that his critics such as the great Krauser PUA are either!).

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 5 Comments [3/24/2017 5:20:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo