SSTDT Top 250!

Quote# 71305

My concern for level of pain of rape would be greater if it weren't for the fact that most American women deserve to raped because they oppose prostitution as a sexual outlet for men. Since they deserve to raped, I cannot concern myself with the pain rape causes them.

fschmidt, love-shy.com 246 Comments [3/4/2010 12:31:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 536
Submitted By: David

Quote# 80934

(Part of a much larger post)

Women do not "love" men ... women do not "love" their parents ... women do not "love" each other ... women do not even "love" their own children ... actually, women are totally INCAPABLE of "love". Even the ancients knew and wrote extensively about this unspoken truth. They are creatures whose sole purpose is self-preservation. Like the shark, they have small brains, no higher self/consciousness, no shred of humanity, and yet are masters of survival and have no enemies other than themselves.

Only men are capable of this concept we call "love" and this is a fact, when was the last time you heard of a woman jumping in front of someone to take a bullet for them?

Exactly.

Women think ONLY of themselves 24 hours a day 7 days a week in a rather narcissistic manner, and this mindset is NOT conducive to chemical reactions such as "love".

So guys, don't feel bad if women do not "appreciate" your "kindness", "love", or "personality" ... you are just dealing with a creature whose walnut-sized brain simply CANNOT process or reciprocate any of the things I just mentioned. That is all. The creature does not mean to "hurt" your feelings, what's happening is that your "kindness" simply does not register with it's ancient reptilian brain. It's nothing "personal" really.

In short ... It's not you, it's them

trogdor005, Men Going Their Own Way 311 Comments [5/1/2011 12:46:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 391
Submitted By: Silver Eyed Rigaldo

Quote# 81990

But, as the post title implies, the Edmonton Slutwalk girls have gone a step further. They are explicitly passing themselves off as sluts. This is fortunate, as it means that now we can start bringing the legal and moral force of society to bear upon them. To re-iterate:
Every woman marching in the Edmonton Slut Walk is publicly declaring herself a slut. This means every woman there desires sex with any and all partners. Any sexual activity you initiate with them comes with implied consent. They cannot say no, and if they do understand all their 'no's mean yes. They are all asking for it. They want it bad. Now. From you. Go get 'em!


Now if you disagree, if you think that's not what this is about at all, then two things come to mind:

1. If a bunch of women stand on the street claiming that they are shoe shiners, and they refuse to shine your shoes, you not only have a false advertising charge you can lay on them, but also discriminatory business practices. Women claiming to be nymphomaniacs who can't get enough may just find themselves having to explain why they are so prudish.
2. By their own admission, they are lying bitches. The worst kind of woman. All marching on the street. Together.


If your wife is one of them, I'm very very sorry. Maybe a good rape might make her a little more manageable around the house.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child, The Third Edge of the Sword 165 Comments [6/16/2011 3:49:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 387
Submitted By: David

Quote# 109504

Q: At what age should a harlot start to be corrected? Is a harlot ever too young to rape?

A: As soon as she’s old enough to be a harlot, you should start correcting her. 9 – 15 is usually the ideal age to start correcting harlots, but no harlot is too young to correct. These days, harlots are getting younger and younger. So, if you see a 6-year-old dressed like a harlot, feel free to rape her. Remember: all harlots are equally deserving of rape.

The Philosophers of Rape, The Philosophy of Rape 142 Comments [6/11/2015 2:09:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 301

Quote# 71770

A penis is a fucking weapon… and I AM a mother of 3 sons! My youngest is 5 and I can tell you, I never allow the older teen boys to bathe him, sleep in the same bed with him, see him naked, sit on their laps, babysit, wrestle or any interaction that involve more than a hug. Do I think my older sons will rape him? In my heart no ,but in my mind I know it can happen because they have a fucking penis and a penis is a weapon. Might sound harsh to some but my job is to protect my kids even from each other. I was the same way when the older boys were younger… no staying over friends house were there are older boys or men. No staying over my brother’s house( my brother loves them and in my heart I know he would not hurt them, but he also has a penis which is a fucking weapon. Only female doctors. Never fully trust any man with a penis. Not their father, uncles, teachers … no one.

I cannot even fathom how vigilant I would have been if my children were females.

Rose, aroomofourown 208 Comments [3/30/2010 3:51:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 291

Quote# 84101

I don't believe I could recommend this as a strategy for most men, but it is surely educational to learn that raping and killing a woman is demonstrably more attractive to women than behaving like a gentleman. And women, before all the inevitable snowflaking commences, please note that there is absolutely nothing to argue about here. It is an established empirical fact.

I would go so far to argue that if you are being introduced to a woman you find attractive, she will be more attracted to you if you slap her in the face without warning and walk away without explanation than if you smile and tell her that you are very pleased to meet her. Now this, being a mere hypothesis, can be argued. And tested, if you're feeling especially scientific this weekend.

[Emphasis added]

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 202 Comments [10/3/2011 3:02:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 285
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 70784

The very first human intercourse was a rape, women have a hymen. Every intercourse after that is still a "rape" because women still have hymens. Women are not supposed to be poked by men, they were all lesbians until one day a freak of nature was born and he got saddled with "God". All men are women first when they develop in the womb, they just have overgrown clits. Female ejaculation contains trace amounts of semen and that's how the ancient female reproductive system reproduced before men "raped" them.

In essence, all sex is rape. Am I going to complain? No, I have a gun to shoot down any "rapist" that enters my home.

Bricktop, AWE 124 Comments [2/19/2010 1:56:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 281
Submitted By: ixolite

Quote# 72877

really sad that womyn got to be this way, it was better a few decades ago... at this point I honestly think a husband needs to be legally allowed to hit his wife once in a while when she misbehaves, it's hard coded in womyn's DNA that a strong man worthy of respect will hit her and severely scold her whenever she tries messing with him, in the end they love their husband a lot more for it... they subconsciously want to be hit and be told to shut up... sad that feminists have screwed this up because it only means that womyn will do all kind of nasty shit that will go completely unchecked and they think they're entitled to it

this is what happens in every third world country, and marriages are really stable there, because the man is the true chief of the family and he is allowed to be a man... this is the un-politically correct truth

Mesian, love-shy.com 237 Comments [5/13/2010 1:51:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 278
Submitted By: David

Quote# 78607

My rape advocacy is twofold. Two aspects of feminism currently independently justify rape, in my view: 1. equality and 2. feminist corruption of justice. Feminist rape law reform has more than blurred the distinction between rape and consensual sex. In many circumstances it no longer matters in the eyes of the law whether we actually rape a woman or not -- she can regret sex in any case and have us convicted of "rape." The law quite explicitly states that mere negligence is enough to be a rapist even if you had no evil intentions. So why should men care if we rape or not? Women don't respect us anymore, so why should we respect women? Hate breeds hate. I have followed the deterioration of justice closely throughout my life, and my heart has been filled with deeper hatred at every step of feminist legal reform. False rape is now institutionalized. At this point, I don't believe Norwegian women are morally entitled to protection from rape.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge's Blog 208 Comments [1/12/2011 7:13:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 265
Submitted By: Honky McCracker

Quote# 72850

The first question any sane, self-loving woman would ask upon realizing that the vast majority of males are rapists is how to keep these rapists away from girls and women. The fact that so many women instead ask how to keep the males from being rapists is a manifestation of feminine masochism.

Margaret, A Room of Our Own 164 Comments [5/10/2010 8:51:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 248
Submitted By: Boy Wonder

Quote# 73179

As I predicted you like banging the rape drum. Yes, I know that rape is bad but you have to admit that there are a lot of worse things, like terminal disease, loss of a limb, or despair. I know it’s humiliating but when it’s over it’s over, not like cancer.

Yes, a Christian woman suffers less from rape than another woman. Are you asking me if I think rapists should go after Christian women? Well if they do they will be faced with the strength and will of the Lord and may even come to His side when they see how little their pathetic abuse can do to a woman of faith!

No you didn’t misunderstand about why rape is a sin. It makes no sense for it to be a sin for a man to rape his wife since a man can’t rape his wife. It’s just not logical, like stealing your own car or pocking your own pocket.

Maybe you got raped and enjoy harping on it. Well the whole world doesn’t revolve around you. Get over it, clear your head and come to God. [Emphasis added]

Censored One, IAmAnAtheist 130 Comments [5/25/2010 9:50:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 242
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 80416

First, there is no such thing as marital rape. Once consent is formally given in public ceremony, it cannot be revoked; the form in which marital consent is revoked is well-established. It is called divorce. This isn't a religious issue, although many on both sides will attempt to view it that way, it's a simple matter of when consent is revocable and the specific form that revocation must take. I invite those who believe that consent may always be granted and revoked at will to consent to join the U.S. Army, then attempt to withdraw their consent. That should serve to clarify the matter for them; one hopes they will enjoy their extended holiday in Afghanistan. The attempt to create a legal concept of "marital rape" is no less than an attempt to destroy the basic concept of marriage. If the husband or the wife has no more claim to the spouse's body than anyone else, then the marital vows are meaningless and the marriage is a charade. Once consent is withdrawn, the marriage has ended.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 140 Comments [4/3/2011 6:17:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 231

Quote# 64100

If a law forces rapists to marry their victims, then perhaps the number of rapes will decline to near zero. What’s more, if the law requires rapists to pay fifty shekels of silver to the father, this could indeed equate to the death penalty if the rapist hasn’t saved toward his bride’s future. Thus, we have narrowed down the field of rapists who marry their victims to only those who have saved for their “brides” future. If the girl happens to be ugly, he is required to marry her anyway. Again, this stipulation will help narrow the field further since potential rapists will be motivated to think before acting. Thirdly, if one “selects” his wife through means of rape, then he’ll never be able to divorce her even if “she” turns out to be a transvestite. The law is putting so many roadblocks into the potential rapist’s path, and causing him to think, I would guess most potential rapists would opt for the easier path of waiting for a willing partner. Thus, such a society could easily exceed the American society in quality by many fold.

[Bold mine]

Alan Clarke, Debunking Christianity  185 Comments [7/16/2009 10:57:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 221
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 74451

And what is that difference? Interestingly I'm actually discussing rape with another new poster as well. . . since the difference between rape and domination is 'consent', what gives consent? Attraction, just with animals and their mating rituals of sexual display - if you are attractive, good sperm, then it's not rape.

e_i-2, love-shy.com 184 Comments [7/13/2010 6:36:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 219
Submitted By: Letipex

Quote# 92007

About the gang-rape of a 23 year old woman in India

"The spiritual leader’s remarks could be paraphrased thus: Those who were at fault were drunk. Had she taken guru diksha and chanted the Saraswati Mantra, she would not have boarded any random bus after watching a movie with her boyfriend. Even if she did, she should have taken God’s name and asked for mercy.

She should have called them brothers, fallen at their feet and pleaded for mercy. Had she said, “I am a weak woman, you are my brothers”, such brutality would not have happened.

The self-proclaimed godman also said he was against harsher punishments for rape accused as such laws could be misused."

Asaram Bapu, The Hindu 49 Comments [1/11/2013 4:02:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 205
Submitted By: erlando

Quote# 64976

Forcing a wife to have sex is not rape as her body already belongs to her husband.

nick, Y!A 144 Comments [8/19/2009 5:23:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 197

Quote# 70160

Considering the hell men have to go through in the feminised world today where everything is skewed to favour women in all areas of life, but especially in the dating scene, then the new system would have to be one which would quickly and swiftly reverse the damage done to our societies by the incessant terrorism of men by feminism and it's policies propped p by governments and institutions. So I'd propose of system of male choice in the dating game. All I'd recommend is one law and one law only with regards to male-female relationships. No matter what a man says to or asks of a woman, a woman cannot say no. A no from a woman could be reported as easily to the Police as a current day rape, and would also be punishable by a jail sentence.

Call me a misogynist, or call me angry from perceived mistreatment of ordinary men under the hammer of feminism, but it's the only way for society to make up for years of torment and give ordinary men not only the chance to date a woman without the fear of ever hearing a no, but also the chance to date out of their league and the chance to produce better-looking offspring.

A woman saying no to a man under the new system could be classed as equivalent to raping the man. You may think this is misoginist and harsh, but wake up guys, ugly men are going to prison daily in feminised countries for even looking at women, when the women will claim is that she was raped, only in actual fact to only be looked at by the wrong type of guy for her in the wrong way.

The only system that would work is one where the dating minefield would be pushed to the female side of the battleground.

Coby, love-shy.com 203 Comments [2/18/2010 3:38:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 192
Submitted By: David

Quote# 73126

Rape is equality

When men have something women have less of, such as money or power, women simply take it by force. It's called affirmative action and feminists believe it's right. I am not going to argue against that. I accept that as a lost cause. So instead I am going to embrace forced equality and demand it for men as well.

What women have that men don't is of course sex. If anyone doubts that sex is a female resource, go here and request the PDF file Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363.

In light of feminism, or if you believe in equality, this article makes such a compelling case for rape that Baumeister felt obliged to include the otiose disclaimer, "Our analysis should in no way be construed as excusing sexual coercion and we roundly condemn any such acts."

So let us give women equality if that's what they really want. Remember that due to the hypergamous nature of women, men get less sex as women get more money and power. Women are generally incapable of feeling attraction for men who are not better than they are, and soon men are no better than equal. So it is about time men in feminist countries such as Norway stop thinking of rape as wrong. I have previously argued this point e.g. here as Arpagus, and no one has been able to justify why affirmative action is right when it benefits women and hurts men but is wrong when it helps men and hurts women.

Arpagus, Eivind Berge's Blog  244 Comments [5/24/2010 7:24:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 192
Submitted By: acooper

Quote# 71363

[After all, there are a lot studies about the rapist striving for the humiliation of the victim and demonstrating his or her power over the victim.]

This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists.


fschmidt, love-shy.com 126 Comments [3/6/2010 2:08:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 190
Submitted By: David

Quote# 93114

Captain Beagle: Which is worse, work or rape? I know 2 women who were raped. Go fuck yourself #sorrynicepplhadtohearthat

VD: Hey, talk to @johnscalzi not me. I certainly didn't rape them.

Captain Beagle: no your article suggested an increase in rapes was less harmful than women handing out resumes. Insensitive & absurd

VD: I didn't suggest it, I proved it. By what metric do you claim that rape is more harmful to society than women working?

Captain Beagle: I was unaware one needed statistical data to prove rape is harmful.

VD: You need something, at any rate. What is your basis for claiming rape is worse for society than female employment?

Captain Beagle: thanx for this fascinating study in hyperbolic misogyny. I'm thinking of using you as the template for my next villain.

Vox Day, Vox Populi 77 Comments [3/14/2013 3:46:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 178

Quote# 70215

Rape is a complete and total fabrication. It never happens. There's no such thing as bad sex. There's bad people, but not bad sex.. I don't see how pounding someone in the ass when they don't want to have it can be seen as so horrible, but meanwhile these same people kill babies and leave their husbands on the drop of a dime.

Demonman, Argue With Everyone 77 Comments [2/10/2010 6:11:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 173
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 79126

Congresscunt Giffords will probably survive being shot in the head, according to medical reports currently available. She will likely suffer some life long brain damage from the injury to her brain, but when the victim is a leftist feminist female, how can you tell? Her husband is a NASA astronaut. She should have been home taking care of her husband's house and family instead of risking her life promoting radical socialist causes and amnesty for illegal aliens. The proper place for females is in the private sphere of house, home, and family. The proper place for females is not in the public sphere of politics. If she lives, the Governor of Arizona will not be able to appoint a man to replace her in Congress. Another tragedy. Maybe she will retire.

Bob Allen, The World According to Bob 101 Comments [1/31/2011 4:42:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 172
Submitted By: JohnTheAtheist

Quote# 89899

I can't go so far as to support rape, I still think it's wrong and should be punished, but I like that women need to live in fear of rape. I like that I have found an issue that the mere mention of can reduce most Feminists to tears. If you want to cause pain to a woman, make a joke about rape. I will be sure to do this more in my own life.

In some spats I had with females during the years, I wonder if they mistakingly took my belligerent attitude as being a threat of rape, which I didn't intend, as opposed to just the threat of violence, which was the effect I was going for.

In conclusion: rape is funny

Otis, Anti-Womens Coalition 84 Comments [11/4/2012 5:00:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 171

Quote# 84582

I recently took a long trip for work and spent a lot of hours in the air. One of my fellow passengers really stood out in my mind: a 20-something lass a few rows ahead of me. She is a natural-born beauty in that “launch a thousand ships” kind of way – slim, near-perfect symmetrical features, piercing blue eyes, and a shapely body. She is, simply, stunning. But there’s more to this story than a retired soldier admiring an exquisite example of female flesh young enough to be my daughter.

It was actually her tattoo that first caught my attention.

She was wearing a low-slung top that revealed a HUGE eagle inked across her chest and extending down under the front of her shirt. And then I noticed her hair – what little there was of it. I’ve always kept my hair short, even by military standards, and her hair was shorter than mine. Few things de-feminize a woman more than buzzing off her hair, which is why it is considered to be shameful in many societies. She was wearing ratty, ripped jeans and far too much costume jewelry. And then I noticed the piercings. As I stood six inches behind her for several minutes waiting to de-plane I counted seven, and that was just what was visible. I wondered what else she had done to herself. A tramp-stamp is a given, but who knows what other “body art” was hidden out of my view[...]

I asked myself what would cause the stunningly-beautiful young woman on my flight – at the height of her Sexual Market Value – to do that to herself? Women dress for us, so what does she intend for us to infer? I’m easy? I’m rebellious? I can drink you under the table?

I can think of no message that her chosen facade would convey that would be in her long-term interest. In a few years after her looks fade she is likely to be just another tatted-up skank wondering where the good men are.

It didn’t have to be this way. In a different social environment a woman like her would have learned to be (gasp!) feminine. She would have observed the older women in her surroundings and absorbed benevolent patriarchy in the air she grew up breathing. With her beauty she could have married above her economic station and lived a comfortable life. We can’t know if she would have been happy, but she almost certainly would have had stability, security and comfort. But she doesn’t live in that society; she lives in a “Slut Walk” society, thanks to feminism. When she chose the “Suicide Girl” look nobody stopped her. Now she has mutilated herself with enough ink and metal trinkets to repel the kind of man most likely to give her the life she wants, because no matter what she does to the outside of her body, she will eventually want what women have always wanted on the inside – stability, security and comfort.

The fruits of feminism: what a waste.

Lyn87, The Spearhead 146 Comments [11/6/2011 4:04:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 169

Quote# 84669

She Obeys Without Reference to Her Feelings About the Will of God

The Scriptures say a woman must ignore her “feelings” about the will of God, and do what her husband says. She is to obey her husband as if he were God Himself. She can be as certain of God’s will, when her husband speaks, as if God had spoken audibly from Heaven!

[...]

What If a Husband Expressly Commands Something Explicitly Wrong?

When women ask me this question, I counter with two of my own:

1) “Have you been living in daily obedience to your husband as part of your wholehearted, loving submission to God?”

(This is an essential part of the problem. If a woman has not been submissive, God has no responsibility for her situation and cannot be blamed if her husband requires something wrong.)

2) “Has your husband ever actually commanded you to do something wrong?”

In the hundreds of times I have asked these questions, not once, if my memory is right, has a woman answered, “Yes, I am always obedient, and yet my husband has required me to break one of God’s laws.”

Never! Why?

Because, when a woman takes God at His word, submits to her husband without reservation, fears God and loves Him, then God takes upon Himself the responsibility to see that a woman does not have to sin!

[...]

Don’t I Have Any Rights?

Can you find a Kleenex somewhere and mop up the tears, just for a minute, long enough to talk to me about what your rights really are?

You don’t have any rights, no rights at all. You lost them on the day you rebelled against God. You lost them, not because you are a woman, but because you are a sinner, just as I am.

Elizabeth Rice Handford, No Longer Quivering 81 Comments [11/5/2011 8:58:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 168

Quote# 86356

The “broken windows” theory of crime:

The basic insight of the “broken windows” theory is that serious crime is kept low when petty crime such as vandalism is kept down. Lesser crimes leave the way open for greater crimes. At least that is my reading of it.

How does this remind me of handling a wife? Like this. As a husband, I have found that arguing with my wife about her “lesser crimes” seems to prevent worse “crimes”. I think women are - ”given an inch” – inclined to “take an ell”. That is, they will behave about as badly as you allow them to. If you argue with the missus about how long her skirts should be, you will not be arguing with her about whether she should wear skirts in the first place. If you are like me, and you prefer your wife not to wear pants (trousers), this is a better argument to have than one about skirts vs pants.

Likewise, if you remonstrate with her about the quality of her meals, you will not be arguing about whether she should cook at all.

Or if you complain that something she wears out looks tarty, you will not be arguing about whether she should flirt or not. Or, more seriously, if you argue and complain about her flirting, you are less likely to find yourself arguing about whether you should have an “open marriage”.

So, punish and deal with the minor crimes, to prevent the major crimes. Deal with broken windows, lest you have to deal with arson.

A wife will test the boundaries. Set them narrow. Don’t let her do outrageous things without any complaint from you, because she will eventually test you and go too far, and then it will be too late.

The same applies to children.

If you are a husband who wants to be an effective head of the house, this is something to keep in mind.

David Collard, Social Biology 84 Comments [3/8/2012 4:40:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 166

Quote# 80197

What Has Feminism Really Done To Us?

God presents Himself in Scripture as male. He wants us to know Him in this way. He sent His SON (not daughter) to die for us. The intent of the Feminists is obvious. They wish first to destroy gender difference in our human relations and then to feminize the very nature of how God presents Himself to our sense.

But other areas are as important:

To maintain sanity, we need to return language to common usage.

We have policemen and policewomen. Policewoman implies, by her physical weakness up against a man, that she is physically less. If there is a burglar in your house, you don’t want to hear the dispatcher say “we’re sending the policewoman right out”!

We have pilots and pilotesses. If the plane is in trouble and the hydraulic system is out (which will require massive male strength to get the plan down), you don’t want to hear “this is the pilotess speaking, and I can’t control, with my limited upper body strength, this plane any longer”!!!

If you’re on the roof of a burning building, you don’t want to hear the little voice of a firewoman holler “jump, I’ll catch you”!

Walter Schneider, Fathers For Life 121 Comments [3/24/2011 8:15:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 162
Submitted By: WickedWitch

Quote# 87762

How does throwing acid in their faces when they demand independence from men benefit women?

Because female independence is strongly correlated with a whole host of social ills. Using the utilitarian metric favored by most atheists, a few acid-burned faces is a small price to pay for lasting marriages, stable families, legitimate children, low levels of debt, strong currencies, affordable housing, homogenous populations, low levels of crime, and demographic stability.

How do honor killings benefit women?

Because female promiscuity and divorce are strongly correlated with a whole host of social ills, from low birth and marriage rates to high levels of illegitimacy.


Vox Day, Vox Popoli 104 Comments [6/11/2012 3:35:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 160

Quote# 84872

The stay-at-home-daughters movement, which is promoted by Vision Forum, encourages young girls and single women to forgo college and outside employment in favor of training as “keepers at home” until they marry. Young women pursuing their own ambitions and goals are viewed as selfish and antifamily; marriage is not a choice or one piece of a larger life plan, but the ultimate goal. Stay-at-home daughters spend their days learning “advanced homemaking” skills, such as cooking and sewing, and other skills that at one time were a necessity -- knitting, crocheting, soap- and candle-making. A father is considered his daughter’s authority until he transfers control to her husband.

Doug Phillips, Vision Forum 100 Comments [11/21/2011 4:15:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 158
Submitted By: PK

Quote# 85149

Taking a belt to his daughter’s rear isn’t criminal, it isn’t anti-biblical, and it shouldn’t be condemned. If the wife stepped out of line he should be free to have her bend over and take a few whacks on the ass as well. A lot of times women get out of line and even the so-called “adult” women are often just children in adult bodies, they sometimes need discipline. For the most part they seem to crave it, they act in a fashion that they know SHOULD provoke a physical response from a healthy/sane male and then when that response doesn’t occur they get upset and begin pushing more and more to see what they can get away with.

If your wife spends more money than you told her she was allowed to spend, she is basically testing you, she is begging you to get tough with her, lay down the law, and be a man. Women won’t, don’t, and probably cannot respect a pushover man, they want a take charge man. Steinem once remarked, “we are becoming the men we wanted to marry” maybe so, but men are becoming the women of old and that doesn’t appeal to women, modern women or women at any other time. If your wife steps out of line and spends more than you told her she could spend, you have her bend over the table and take her belting/paddling like a big girl. Maybe for a lot of women it wouldn’t even be a negative thing.

What does modern society expect us to do, roll over and apologize that the woman was acting unruly and out of line? I say you paddle her ass and see where things go from there (more likely than not she’ll beg you to mount her right then and there).

Bryan, The Spearhead 101 Comments [12/10/2011 6:13:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 157

Quote# 89104

Slapping a girl across the face isn’t just about hurting her, it’s a kind of neg. It says, “I can crush you like an insect, but you aren’t worth the effort.” It’s a tacit acknowledgment that she’s weaker than you, beneath you, and if she crosses you again, you’ll put her in the hospital. You treat her like she’s a child throwing a temper tantrum, not an equal.

Like I said already, you should NOT hit women, not unless you want to end up in jail. But the principle still stands. Women should be terrorized by their men; it’s the only thing that makes them behave better than chimps.

Ferdinand Bardamu, Manosphere Copies 101 Comments [8/21/2012 3:45:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 156

Quote# 85150

These verses [1 Corinthians 7] show clearly that there is an obligation to have sex, never a right to not have sex. This is where the old term, the “marriage debt” comes from. It is a debt owed by both parties to the other. And withholding of sex is defrauding the partner. This is not regarded by the Church traditionally as a small matter, or unimportant. Rather if a wife defrauds her husband by not submitting and giving him sex when he desires it, she has committed a mortal sin.

For those not familiar with the term, a mortal sin is a grave offense not only against the marriage partner, but against God Himself. And, without confessing the sin, doing penance, and agreeing that it will not happen again, the woman will lose her soul and be consigned to hell.

So, we see how serious the sex obligation is for both husband and wife. These are debts and obligations agreed to and taken upon each other by the vows of marriage. The idea of marital rape is asinine and ridiculous. It only shows how far we have gotten from a real conception of marriage.

The woman has not power over her body, but her husband. Where is the wiggle room for marital rape here? There is none whatsoever. The very development of this anti-Christian concept shows that we must remove the State from marriage and restore true marriage with its vows and obligations – otherwise there is no marriage at all, only a farce masquerading under the false name of “marriage” to deceive men into its clutches.

Peter, The Spearhead 94 Comments [12/10/2011 6:13:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 154

Quote# 81647

[On why young girls should dress modestly]

For example,
I knew of a man, his wife recently died. He had never touched anyone but his wife, sexually. Never ever thought of a child. But there was a neighbor who allowed her little girls to hang around the man. They wore tank tops and shorts. The old man asked if the girls could clean for him. He offered to pay them. They came over once or twice a week. Within a month into this, he started 'touching' them.
..Fortunately, the girls told their mother very soon and it didn't go any further, but the old man had never done it before, nor did he ever do it again.

The man became tempted by them, their vulnerability, their skin.


Rhomphaia (Sword) , queenqueequeg 91 Comments [6/1/2011 4:05:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 154
Submitted By: AtroposHeart

Quote# 81249

If all this is true, what are these women protesting? As I said, they are frightened. There is such a thing as rape, and they cannot process that reality. They have no way of understanding or making sense of it – and so they protest against it, hoping that outrage alone will make it go away. They want a world in which rape does not occur. Such a thing is not possible. However, there is a way to gain safety. A woman can protect herself against rape not by staging protests, especially protests defending sluttiness, but by earning the protection of good men. Men protect women against men. The sensible woman’s path in a dangerous world is to earn the protection of good men.

Laura, The Thinking Housewife 114 Comments [5/13/2011 3:48:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 154
Submitted By: Silver Eyed Rigaldo

Quote# 65201

[Concerning a bill in the Bahamas to outlaw marital rape]

"It is ridiculous for them to try to make that a law, because I don't think a man can rape his own wife. After two people get married, the Bible says that they become one – one flesh. How is it possible to rape what is yours?"


"Even if a woman says no to her husband it still can't be considered rape because she is his wife. He already paid his dues at the church and she already said 'I do,' so from then on, even if [a man] forces sex on his wife, it isn’t rape"

Pemmie Sutherland and Elvis Russell, The Bahama Journal 68 Comments [9/1/2009 9:58:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 153
Submitted By: Comhradh

Quote# 88543

These are merely five of the many semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years. I listed them in the order in which I admired their courage and actions - meaning, that they are from greatest to least. But, that is not to say that I don’t admire them all. I respect all of these women for their courage, strength, resolve, and willingness to do what is just.

#1 – Sandra Crockett (1997)
In 1997, Sandra Crockett had her mentally handicapped son, who was 21 at the time, castrated in order to curb his sexual impulses and aggression. She feared that he would be taken away from her because of this, and she did not want him to be placed in a mental institution. Likewise, she said that he had been feeling some pain in his testicles. This one was originally number three on my list, but I loved this woman’s story so much, that I moved it up to number one. I greatly admire her, and I think she is a loving, kind hero. She did what she thought was best for her son, and it benefitted them both in the end. I believe that more women should, in terms of the practicality of the modern world, follow her example.

#2 – Anjana Maity (2009)
In 2009, forty-two year old Anjana Maity castrated her 13 year old son and then beheaded him. Interestingly enough, this act of release against the boy was committed after the woman’s husband, Ranjit Maity, left their family. He had had an affair, and he had threatened to set her and her son on fire if they did not leave him alone. The child was clearly suffering, as was she, and this should be considered an act of mercy on her behalf. So, regardless of whether she was arrested or not, she did the right thing.

#3 – Catherine Kieu Becker (2011)
In 2011, forty-eight year old Catherine Kieu Becker cut off her husband’s penis with a ten-inch kitchen knife. No act such as this is committed if the other party is undeserving. And, given that her husband was a man, who had attempted to abandon her, I would say that he did, indeed, deserve it. Mrs. Becker is a hero for seeking retribution for the misery she had been caused by her husband. Regardless of whether or not she was arrested, she is a champion, and I admire her courage.

#4 – Joyce Maxine Gregory (2012)
In 2012, thirty-five year old Joyce Maxine Gregory fought back against her boyfriend, or ex-boyfriend, after he went on a rampage through their home. During the struggle that followed afterwards, she grabbed his testicles, causing the scrotum to split open. And, while he may have recovered afterwards, meaning she didn’t quite finish the job, I still admire her for her bravery. It takes a lot to stand up against someone who is physically larger than you, especially when they have lost control of their senses. I salute her.

#5 – Chalie Simon (2009)
In 2009, nineteen year old Chalie Simon grabbed her boyfriend by the testicles and squeezed hard as he attempted to forcefully push her from his residence. Her actions came from his neglect for her feelings, and his neglect of providing the simple attention that she asked him for. It was justified, and regardless of whether or not she was arrested, I salute her for standing up against someone who mistreated her for loving them.

________________________________
That is my list for now - five of the greatest, semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years and or decades. I salute them all, I admire them all, and I hope that I, too, can be as brave when standing up against those who wish to do me harm.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 86 Comments [7/26/2012 3:40:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 121

Quote# 88952

The New World: The Rebirth, Castration Day, Breeders and More

I have written about this multiple times in the past, but due to the fact that I have numerous articles, it appears that people are not able to find every bit of information that I have provided, so I will detail it here.

1) Castration Day: The purpose of this day is to pacify males for further processing, meaning, in the end, the majority of them would eventually be terminated, and this holiday would no longer be entirely relevant at a certain point – the day of the True Rebirth, and the dawn of The New World. It is merely a major point in the short-term solutions for the pacification and so forth of all males.

2) The population of males world-wide for the indefinite future after the implementation of the short-term solutions would be around 10%, for the purposes of practicality. The 10% that remained would be used for the sole purpose of breeding, and nothing more. They would be given enough sustenance and so forth to remain alive, while being held in captivity to keep them from posing a threat to the general population outside (women). They would be allowed visitation by their closest female guardian(s) and or relatives if their closest female guardian(s) or relatives wishes to see them.

3) All males, regardless of age, would be eligible (with the consent of their closest female guardian) for castration. However, their closest female guardian (CFG) would be advised to exempt them from castration and sign them up as a future Breeder (someone used for sample-collection) on the basis of supply-and-demand. If the supply was well enough for the foreseeable future, the CFG would likely be advised to go ahead and have the male castrated, and in The New World, the CFG would likely comply with this. There would be no moral qualm about such an issue, because it would be based entirely on practicality and common knowledge (men need to be castrated to keep women safe) – there would be no emotional attachment to such a process. It would be seen as creating civility in the individual male, not as an act of harm.

4) The purpose of Castration Day is not to shame men, but to liberate all people and to civilize men. Nothing more, and nothing less. It is the only way.

5) Until science could be used to create genetically strong female progeny from two female parents (The Rebirth), the world population of males would remain around 10%. Once science was able to complete such a process (The Rebirth), the world-wide population of men would be held at around 1%, just in case. Any males who were born after this would be either disposed of or kept based entirely upon foreseeable practicality and potential for genetic efficiency. No emotional attachment would dictate otherwise, and if it did, the woman with said attachment would be reformed.

6) Some point out the issue of genetic deficiency due to lack of diversity, and a potential for inbreeding. In The New World, however, this would be a non-issue… Genetics would remain strong due to population. Say, for instance, the world-wide population in The New World is 7 billion, and 10% of that population is male, that would mean that there would be 700 million males world-wide. A sustainable population. If you multiply 6,300,000,000 (the number of females) by 700,000,000 (the number of males), you get 4,410,000,000,000,000,000 possibilities for the genetic makeup of future offspring. The population by the time The New World comes will be much larger than 7 billion, meaning that the possibilities will be even greater in number than this. Inbreeding and weakness of DNA will not be an issue.

7) By the time males are old enough to provide sperm samples, at the consent of their CFG, they will be screened for specific traits prior to Castration Day to see if they are viable Breeders. This screening will determine whether or not they are the most suitable contributors genetically. Characteristics will include testing physical symmetry, age-height-weight ratio, mental health, and parasite resistance, or the strength of their immune system. It is based entirely on practicality and efficiency, and nothing more. This would be done until The Rebirth (the day when science has its breakthrough in creating female progeny from two female parents and the male population is reduced to 1% world-wide via termination).

8) Post-Rebirth, Castration Day will be reduced to a smaller set of local screenings and procedures in each city world-wide, they will be uniform and set in stone, and the process will no longer be a celebration by all people, but a way of life for any male. Testing and screening for potential genetic contribution will happen at a male’s birth, and will be more lenient at that time, looking only for typical symmetry and a decent healthiness. This process will then be repeated when the male reaches the age to provide samples (maturity). If a male is born and appears to be weak, it will be disposed of. If a male is sufficient, it will be allowed to reach the age of “maturity”. It will then be screened again, for the aforementioned traits which will be determined by then, and if it is still sufficient, it will be kept as a Breeder. If it is not, it will be terminated. If the amount of males in relation to Post-Rebirth supply-and-demand is sufficient, all newborn males will be terminated based on the age and assumed longevity of the currently existing males, unless the particular male appears to be exceptionally healthy and strong.

It is as simple as that.

Thank you for reading.

Sincerely,
Femitheist

*Footnote: Breeders and all of the samples that they give would be identified with a set of numbers unique to them as an individual. These numbers would essentially be their name and or identity. Any woman who collects a sample will have her own ID in the system marked with said Breeder-number, and so shall her children's Birth Certificates and IDs be marked with the same Breeder-number. That way, if her children were to return some day to take a sample, they would not (on the off-chance it might occur) be given a sample from the same Breeder that their mother took from. This would be done to avoid any possibility of inbreeding. Sample-collection, retrieval and artificial insemination centers would be dispersed all across the world at local areas, as Breeders too would be dispersed all across the world, in numbers sufficient to the specific area.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 72 Comments [8/13/2012 3:47:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 111

Quote# 90508

These are things that will occur as is only possible through the creation of The New World, Post-Rebirth, as defined here.
.
.
.
-:New World Introductions:

•Global crime reduction of 95% (with a 5% exception for mentally ill individuals and femyles who have yet to be fully reformed).
•End of all war perpetually.
•Removal of all males within the guidelines of the Sufficient Genetic Standards and or Population Percentage Requirement (1-10% Globally Male).
•Removal of all femyles which are nonconvertible/unconformable (Pater-Fixation ~ incurable obsession with males ~ Mental Illness).
•Containment of all individuals with incurable disease(s) up until the time a cure for said disease(s) has been found.
•Removal of all incurably mentally-ill individuals, as defined by the Global Health Departments (GHD) standards.
•Removal of incurable femyle gender traitors and ALL male gender traitors. Regardless of the circumstances.
•Introduction of a One-World Government and a One-World Ruler (Queen), with subsidiary rulers for each nation, state, province, county, city and so forth.
•Removal of all civilian firearms due to a lack of necessity, and for public safety (avoidance of accidents).
•Universal health care with 100% coverage for all.
•Population control based on supply-and-demand for newer life. Sustainable population.
•Abolition and or destruction of all Non-Womyn (God as the Womyn) oriented religions and religious texts.

-:The Five Tenets/Doctrines of Femitheism

•The individual as well as the collective are equally important. All things must be done for the betterment of oneself and for the betterment of society as a whole. Self-improvement and all attempts to improve ones own life are seen as an act done for the greater good of all womyn.
•Each womyn is her own God, and equally the God of all others. Mutual respect among and between all womyn as well as the utmost respect for oneself is necessary for a functioning society.
•The removal of males, the incurably mentally-ill, and femyle gender traitors which cannot be reformed was, is, and forever will be a necessary function of life, bred from the desire to further produce prosperity, peace, health and general humyn enhancement.
•All laws which are set in place are for the greater good of all womyn. The intention and or nature of all of the laws which exist and or are created should not be questioned, as it is understood that these laws are the essence of justice.
•These Tenets/Doctrines must be the simple, central focus of each womyn's life. They must never be disregarded, questioned or broken.

Femitheist Divine, Femitheist Reborn 82 Comments [11/5/2012 4:53:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 102

Quote# 75424

[In a discussion about Saudi Arabian and Muslim women in general driving. Hijab = head scarf and/or facial veil, fitnah = temptation, disorder, struggle to remain pious, etc.]

Salam alaikum, here is opinion in the light of Qur'an and Sunnah.

Praise be to Allaah.

The ruling on women driving should be clear, because women driving includes a number of evils, including the following:

1 – Removal of hijab, because driving a car involves uncovering the face which is the site of fitnah and attracts the glance of men....This is how things usually develop; they start out in an acceptable fashion then they get worse.

2 – Another evil consequence of women driving cars is that they lose their modesty, and modesty is part of faith as is narrated in a saheeh report from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Modesty is the noble characteristic that befits the nature of women and protects them from being exposed to fitnah. Hence it is mentioned in a metaphorical sense (in Arabic), in the phrase “more modest than a virgin in her seclusion.” Once a woman’s modesty is lost, do not ask about her.

3 – It also leads to women going out of the house a great deal, but their homes are better for them – as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said – because those who love to drive enjoy it very much, hence you see them driving around in their cars here and there for no purpose, except to enjoy driving.

4 – You may find a divorced woman going where she wants, whenever she wants and however she wants, for whatever purpose she wants, because she is alone in her car, at any time she wants of the day or night. She may stay out until late at night. If people are complaining about this with regard to young men, then what about young women, going all over the place the length and breadth of the country, and maybe even beyond its borders.

5 – It is a means of women rebelling against their families and husbands; at the least provocation they may go out of the house and drive in the car to wherever they think they can get some peace, as happens in the case of some young men, who are able to put up with more than women.

6 – It is a cause of fitnah in many places: when stopping at the traffic lights, or at gas stations, or at inspection points, or when stopped by policemen at the scenes of traffic infractions or accidents, or if the car stalls and the woman needs help. What will her situation be in this case? Perhaps she may come across an immoral man who takes advantage of her in return for helping her, especially if her need is great to the point of urgency.

7 – It causes fitnah to flourish because women – by their nature – like to make themselves look good with clothing etc. Do you not see how attached they are to fashion? Every time a new fashion appears they throw away what they have and rush to buy the new things, even if it is worse than what they have. Do you not see the adornments that they hang on their walls? In the same way – or perhaps more so – with the cars that they drive, whenever a new model appears they will give up the first for the new one.

With regard to the questioner asking, “And what is your opinion on the idea that women driving cars is less dangerous than their riding with non-mahram drivers?” – what I think is that both of them involve danger, and one is more serious than the other in some ways, but there is no necessity that would require one to do either of them.

Hadiya, Hijab Chic blog 64 Comments [8/20/2010 5:05:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 98

Quote# 88788

Gender-based Abortion - Abort the Males

Gender-based abortion continues to exist for females all around the world. This female gendercide is based on the notion that females are innately inferior, or socially unworthy and or lacking of the potential for profitable intake.

The abortion of females based on gender all around the world, and even in America, effectively exemplifies the fact that many women are still indoctrinated, and many men are still pushing misogynistic agendas, both politically and culturally. These things must end if we are ever to achieve True Equality.

Now, the U.S. House has rejected a bill which would preclude gender-based abortion if doctors were to come across information regarding the person’s intent for the abortion. And, while I am pro-choice, I feel that the purpose of this bill was slightly misguided. It should be revised and legalized, and I will explain the reasoning for this.

The bill should be revised to include only abortions against female fetuses. Meaning, anyone who seeks an abortion because the gender of their fetus is female should be barred from having said abortion, and perhaps even criminally punished, depending on which half of the party came to this conclusion, assuming there are two present halves, for said desire. And, any doctor who performs an abortion for someone who wishes to dispose of a fetus due to the gender being female should receive criminal punishment.

On the other hand, anyone who desires to abort a fetus based on the gender because the fetus is male should be excluded from the bill entirely. This should be allowed. It is justified because women have proven to be the most profitable sex. They outperform men academically and in the workplace, and this is a trend which will continue to rise. Likewise, women are the greater minority when it comes to the committing of violent acts and crime.

[...]

Men, for many centuries, feared the education of women, and even stated that women were incapable of being educated, saying that they were “creatures of emotion without the ability to reason”. If this were the case, however, they would have at least tried to educate women to see if they had a potential for reasoning. They didn’t do this, because they feared that very potential. They knew all along that women could surpass them if they were given the opportunity, and they oppressed women for this very reason.

And, when women finally did achieve these opportunities, thanks to Patriarchal Manipulation for fear of a true awakening, women, overtime, did surpass men, are surpassing men, and will continue to surpass men until the true balance is overwhelmingly clear.

Save the females. Abort the males.

It is justified, it is necessary, and its premise is Undeniably True.

Thank you for your consideration!

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 75 Comments [8/6/2012 5:20:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 95

Quote# 88634

Should handicapped people be aborted and or euthanized?

The answer is, undeniably: Yes.

They should be.

Now, allow me to explain.

People, regardless of gender, who are born with either a mental disability or a physical disability, that is of such a degree it has been socially proven to hinder normal common functions, should not be allowed to suffer through a life of misery at the hands of care-takers and or sitters.

Not only is someone who is mentally handicapped or physically handicapped a drain to society, to tax-payers, and to their own family members and “friends” who are forced to care for them each day, but they, themselves, will suffer a lifetime of meaninglessness and agony.

This has to end.

The simple solutions for this would be to:

A) Test for hindering disabilities, and upon finding one, have the child aborted at the mother’s permission (which should be greatly encouraged or even lawfully mandated).
B) Have any child who manages to be born in a way that evades abortion euthanized as soon as possible, in order to keep them from straining not only society, but their own family as well.

Men should take no roll in this decision. And, they should have no interaction with the process of aborting or euthanizing the handicapped child; for multiple reasons:

A man performing an abortion of this sort, which slightly reflects a Spartan-esque ideology, would be doing nothing more than posturing and inflating their masculinity, as they are then, by extension, the official executioner of a life which they did not birth, and physically cannot birth.

Only women should be the official “executioners” or “doctors” who perform these ceremonial procedures, because, if a woman were to do it, it would be an act of kindness by the very inherent nature of that which is female. They would be, essentially, putting a life out of its misery so that it did not have to suffer. Unlike a man, who would only be asserting his dominance over said life, which he cannot ever even hope to produce; due to lacking the necessary genetic components for giving birth.

If a male or a female is found, in the womb, to be disabled, or are able to be born with a disability, which would, in the future of their life, cause an economic, mental and physical strain on their family, and even society as a whole, they should be aborted or euthanized.

That is my verdict on this important issue.

Thank you for your consideration!


Femitheist Divine,  The New Era of Feminism 97 Comments [7/29/2012 10:53:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 84
Submitted By: Ahmer

Most Aptly Named Site Ever

And that's quite enough of this guy, he'll be getting flushed for a while.

Quote# 97746

[About getting arrested for threatening to murder a teenage girl:]

The only reason why I got arrested was that I was stupid enough to co-operate with the police (a mistake I will never repeat). I told them that I knew the girl and that's when they first got her real name. I wasn't even arrested initially. I was called for a meeting and was arrested when I told the cops her name. That's what I mean by telling the truth. I mistakenly believed that these police officers had brains and decency when they had neither.

None of these cops wanted to help me get a gf and the female judge didn't want to fuck me. Despite my numerous complaints, affidavits and protests, even going as far as to protest naked with a drum, they've not yet been punished for this. Nor were my parents. All of these criminals are walking free.

I now see the story with that girl as a greater tragedy than I saw it before. The tragedy isn't so much my missed chance with her or my arrest, but the fact that I didn't kill her. It would have probably been better if I did. She was just a single person. If I were ever to take up arms many people might die. I prefer this to not happen, but I don't see a way out. I have no money to move abroad and no Western woman wants a decent man.

coconut, Why, God, Why? 86 Comments [11/20/2013 5:30:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 81

Quote# 104276

I have and I still believe I'd have sex with a woman against her consent. The difference now is that when I wrote that I thought that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.

caamib, Why, God, Why? 180 Comments [10/23/2014 3:21:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 78

Quote# 92527

What a dumbass you are!
So just because you have been brainwashed and conditioned to think the way things currently are is 'superior' that makes it so?How are those marriage/diviorce statistics working out for ya fella?Maybe if we push womens lib and the gay agenda a little more things will get better eh?Lets do more of the same thing that has already failed..sound logic there :P

Feminism is a cancer on society that has turned generations of men in to emasculated wimps,and made women rude and crude at the cost of their femininity.You seriously think more western men are marrying foreign women from countries with traditional values because they are as you quote 'losers'?

No..they merely want a woman that actually carries herself as a woman.If they wanted to marry another man they would join the gay movement.Feminists have noone to blame but themselves.Also funny how your type is fond of parroting scathing propaganda about 'submissive foreign women' and the western losers that love them'.
\
Here's a novel thought..what if it was your feminist bullshit that was unnatural.And it was the natural state of nature and relationships for a man to be dominant,and his woman submissive to him.Would you still pursue your stupid womens lib agenda,even if it meant destroying the balance of human nature?You probably would wouldn't you?Just as long as you get your silly 'rights'. :P

gtw1983, Manhood Academy 81 Comments [2/7/2013 4:42:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 66

Quote# 96191

Any honest woman who has been out in the field for a few years, would admit after a couple cocktails that she'd prefer be to be a traditional domestic servant cleaning the house and blowing her husband if he was an in shape,high status, alpha stud, pulling in big dollars and running everything else. The real problem is that equality is a lot of fucking work - turns out they don't like lifting heavy shit and working long hours - who would have thought? You can't have it both ways. Gender roles are "chivalry" when they benefit women and "sexism" when they don't.

Cody Stark , Return Of Kings 52 Comments [8/26/2013 3:23:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 66

Quote# 88542

The fact of the matter is, even then, and also now, women are still more important reproductively than men. In this world, it is not quite as necessary due to the immense numbers of the human species, but nevertheless, women are still the more important half.

For instance, if humanity were to undergo… say… a transformation of the short-term solutions sort. It would be sensible for 1-10% of the global population to remain male. For behavioral studies, and for reproductive purposes – a good example to remember is that it would require only one man to populate a city, while it would require an entire city of women for the same task. Women are more important because they bear the child, and thusly, they are needed in greater numbers.

If my short-term solutions were implemented, and men and boys were castrated in great numbers, it would make sense for some men to be able to be signed up through governmentally operated programs to become “Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm.

They would be used for sample collection based on supply-and-demand. This, along with the use of scientifically generated progeny, would be able to sustain a perfect population. Primarily female, and sufficiently - to the extent that it is necessary for sample collection - male.

Likewise, mothers or close female guardians would be advised to exempt their male children from castration if it were necessary on the basis of supply-and-demand. They could still go through with it, but they would be advised to not do so until the male grew older.

This practice of castration, Breeder usage, and sample collection would continue until it was scientifically possible to create female children entirely from the organic material of female adults. Then, the existence of men would no longer be necessary at all. Long-term solution implementation would follow.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 54 Comments [7/26/2012 3:39:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 61

Quote# 97478

Cybercunt, Cybercunt... There is absolutely no way for you to begin to understand why you're completely wrong. How could have you been arrested or begged your father for sex due to incel when the fact that you were born with a hole between your legs made it almost certain that you will never become incel?

If you had any understanding of what kind of pain incel can cause you wouldn't try to shame me for suffering because of incel. You'd see that it is actually my parents and my government who are the criminals, not me. Instead you're trying to convince me and other men that we can all do well without a girlfriend, that sickness is health, that insanity is sanity.

Coconut, Why, God, Why? 63 Comments [11/4/2013 3:44:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 55

Quote# 101339

(radical feminist depiction of trans women)



Sofia, genderheritic 53 Comments [6/5/2014 3:24:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 49

Quote# 88394

It is a well-known fact that porn is a gateway for oppressive behavior, used to exploit women for the profit of others - women who are incapable of finding any other solution for gathering an income merely to survive. But, that is not the topic for this post. The topic for this post concerns male fantasies, young girls, and the potential for rape.

“Legal” pornography which involves women who are “of age”, or 18, is one of the most popular forms of pornography in regards to consumption. The attraction for men in this particular type of pornography is the youth of the girl, and to appease this attraction, the girl(s) in these movies and videos are forced to attempt to make themselves seem naively innocent, child-like, both externally and internally, in order to convey a sense of submissiveness to the male viewer.

[...]

It is my contention, because of this, that all men who desire this type of pornography are pedophiles and, inevitably, potentially dangerous rapists. They are drawn to the girl’s youth, and the fantasy that the girl is underage. It adds a sense of risk and taboo to the thrill. And, what is often cited, beyond sex, as the cause for rape? The desire for dominance and power. The difference between a girl at the age of 15 and a girl at the age of 18 is very minute, and men are capable of recognizing that.

I encourage any girl out there who is still dating a man to stop him from watching pornography, or, at the very least, if that is too daunting, find out what type of pornography he is often viewing. If it concerns young females and that sort of fantasy, I would suggest getting away from him as quickly as possible. Not only is he extremely depraved, sick and disgusting, but he is likely a pedophile, or has pedophilic desires, and he likely has a great potential for raping in the near future.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 50 Comments [7/17/2012 3:17:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 48

Quote# 96420

I stopped watching television years ago. When mainstream news started featuring whores with miniskirts showing everything, I realized that TV had been totally corrupted. You can't even watch the daily news anymore. Everything happening on the TV screen centers around the woman's vagina. That's what the reporter with a miniskirt all the way up her thighs says to any red-blooded man with a man's mind. No healthy man with a normal mind can sit watching a woman with her thighs exposed and not think sexually. Americans have adopted a dirty Playboy philosophy. It's wickedness and God hates it! It's all so sexually suggestive, promiscuous and perverted. Although we're all sinners, there are those who want to see perversion on television, and then there are those who don't. I don't. I want to have a clean mind. Clean living comes from clean thinking.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 75 Comments [9/7/2013 6:39:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 44

Quote# 104277

I am not an MRA because MRAs are manginas. We men could take down this system and bring back sanity by the end of the day. Women would not be able to stop us, since they lack our physical strength or access to weapons. Then we could make feminists and sluts into prostitutes, kill off all omega scumbag players and make a sane society with decent men and women. MRAs don't stand for that and erroneously believe that women are the problem when just looking at MRAs shows it is men who are the problem.

caamib, Why, God, Why? 118 Comments [10/23/2014 3:22:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 41

Quote# 112583

Do REAL men Rape?

In praise of the Caveman, wherever & whenever he may live....

Actually, REAL men DO rape. It's in our genes; hardwired into our DNA. Has been for 100,000 years. Do you really think the average caveman would have put up with all the shit that today's women make men put up with just to get laid? NO! He'd have clubbed her upside the head with his club, and dragged her by the hair (never by the feet--cuz then her crotch would fill up with dirt), back to his man-cave, and have himself a private little no-holes-barred caveman rape-a-thon!

ONLY in relatively recent times (and most especially, in post-feminist America) have men become so pussy-fied that they've all but given up on this age-old manly mating ritual. Indeed, there are only a few "real men" left. You can spot them. They are the ones who think RAPE ROCKS!

Raymond J. Pistachio, Rapetown, USA 51 Comments [9/6/2015 4:28:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 97806

I guess what I don’t understand is how someone as self aware as you can deal with knowing how utterly inferior your gender is to men. I’m sure if you were black you would be miserable as you would hate being an inferior race, so why doesn’t it bother you to be an inferior sex?

Also, as a Hindu, how do you deal with the possibility that in a past incarnation you were ugly, stupid or black? Which would be the “real” FeministX: the ugly/stupid/black one of previous incarnations or the one you are now?


Otis the Sweaty, The Little Spoon 17 Comments [11/23/2013 4:15:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 35

Psychopathic Vanity Award

"I have body image issues, therefore, girls worldwide should have to grow up without their eyes."

Quote# 121717

BrokenIndigoCrayons recently made a thread entitled "95% of female newborns should be blinded by doctors" and I have to confess that I agree with him.

Usually that's the point where normies show up to "debate" us. They want to refute our "arguments" and react surprised when we accuse them of attacking us, "I'm not attacking or belittling you, we're just having a discussion".

But there is no debate to be had:

* I don't want to be laughed at.
* I don't want to be looked at with disgust.
* I don't want to be compared to Chad.
* I don't want to be afraid to go out in public.
* I don't want women to see me.

All of that (and some more) can be summed up in the sentence "Women should be blinded at birth".

These feelings are real. They are not up for discussion. You don't get to tell me what my lived experience is. You don't get to tell me how I am allowed to feel.

Arguing that me not wanting women to see me is not real, that me not wanting women to see me is not true, that me not wanting women to see me makes me a horrible person is not ok. There is no "just having a discussion", you are attacking and belittling me at every step of your stupid "arguments".

Are normies really so delusional that they cannot see how they are reinterpreting an expression of vulnerability and emotion as some kind of proposal for political action that must be debated and stopped? Don't they recognize that every step of these strawman discussions is about denying our incel experience?

Most of the "discussion" on this subreddit involves one person laying out their hurt and feelings while another person does his or her best to invalidate them one by one in the spirit of what he or she either believes or at least pretends to be believe to be a reasoned discussion. That's not how successful communication works.


PorphyriosMalik, Reddit - /r/Incels 86 Comments [9/22/2016 2:44:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 35

Quote# 122169

The primary contribution any woman can make for science is to stay completely out of it. No matter how good she is, no matter how smart she is, she cannot possibly compensate for the complete devastation and distraction she is going to leave in her wake over the course of her career among the socially and sexually hapless gammas who might have otherwise happily spent decades slaving away in the laboratories.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 43 Comments [10/22/2016 5:17:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 32

Quote# 97124

[On extending protection to male rape victims]

And this also gets to the heart of my objection to applying the victimhood mantle to the male. Making men as physically helpless and violable as contemporary feminists hold women to be is a form of social castration. One of the defining characteristics of masculinity is the possession of agency — the ability to act. Take this away and we are slaves, so removing this from men – even with a concept ostensibly meant to “protect” men – leads us down a hole, at the bottom of which we find ourselves bereft of our manhood both culturally and legally. And make no mistake: many people really do want to rob men of their manhood. Male feminist Michael Kimmel has made a career of it.

This is not to say that men cannot be victimized or real victims; they clearly can and this has always been recognized. But the most effective means of victimizing men has always been to reduce them to a state in which they are incapable of protecting themselves and acting in their own interests, and this is accomplished as easily by feminizing them as by direct force of arms.

When a woman appeals to people for help and protection, she is engaged in an empowering act. When men rush to a woman’s aid, it demonstrates her female potency. When her “needs” are met by others, it does not detract from but rather adds to her status. For ancient, immutable reasons, this does not apply to men.

The man who cries “help” feels a certain shame. When he must apply for welfare, it is humiliating and emasculating. That men must swallow their pride and do so from time to time is a given, but almost all of us recognize that it is far from ideal when the necessity presents itself. Ideally, the man has agency, and can fend for himself. In a society that valued men, steps would be taken to ensure that men have the opportunity to do so. A society that enshrines male victimhood is the exact opposite.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 25 Comments [10/19/2013 6:43:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 32

Quote# 97692

Given the disposable nature of the male, it makes no sense to presume that they have the same capability of experiencing deeper emotions that the female possesses. Males shouldn’t really be capable of the same level of suffering, and it would be an inefficient allocation of resources to help them with things like rape and violence. Even in the unlikely event that they could experience deeper emotions, the allocation of resources to protect “innocent” males would be much more efficiently allocated helping “innocent” females, as their existence and health is more valuable to population stability. Why waste money for feel-good notions like “equality” or “justice”? These are simply subjective platitudes that apes made up in order to derive some sense of control over an indifferent and random world. They hold no objective value. Efficiency is at least quantifiable.

Unphysicalism,  Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men 24 Comments [11/17/2013 5:04:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 30

Quote# 104365

We could also say that men are simple biological machines as well, as they would fuck basically anything if allowed.

That’s why we need extremely strict rules and harsh punishments for both genders when it comes to things like adultery. A man who commits adultery with another man’s wife must know he will, if discovered, die.

Also, you’re once again incredibly naive. If you support women’s suffrage you can’t support female premarital chastity. I mean, you can, but that’s insane, as it makes no sense and is contradictory.

A woman's suffrage is a feminist policy and means that women will vote themselves priviledges that will enable them to be sluts.

It’s like saying you support democracy but won’t support something the demos votes for – not possible.

Your ideas are like saying “I support billions being thrown into war machine but I oppose war.”

C’mon.

caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 82 Comments [10/28/2014 3:09:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 103091

In a recently published VICE interview, she explains femitheism as follows: "I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class – a far more valued class – having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death."

To be fair, she doesn't believe that men should be slaughtered, but that they should be gradually phased out of the population through genetic engineering and possibly selective abortions. And she claims that these steps would not be mandated, "at first," but merely encouraged. Children would very much designed, and raised communally by the state. "Perfect girls will be conceived, developed, and engineered in state-owned breeding centers. They will be bound together in a communal venue under the instruction and control of female savants."

The few men that are left would be kept on their own reservations and used only for breeding, possibly some light labor. When asked if she acknowledged that some men have ambitions beyond "luxury breeding pens," she answered: "Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null."

Femitheist Divine, Outer Places 68 Comments [9/1/2014 3:38:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 100709

Reminds me of Marabel Morgan's 1973 book The Total Woman. Morgan was in the social circle of the wives of Miami Dolphins football players and witnessed how a large percentage of these pampered young wives were destroying their marriages by turning into slovenly nags, so she wrote an advice book teaching her friends two things.

The first was time management. Hey girls: get your small half of the division of labor within your marriages done early, so you don't feel unhappy and bitchy about cleaning, grocery shopping, cooking etcetera on account of only getting it done at the last minute and under pressure. Get your stuff done early and you can feel great about yourselves while you go about your "me" time shoe-shopping or whatever, instead of feeling guilty about getting nothing done all day.

The second was to tell these women that in their conflicts with their husbands, THEY were the problem, not the husbands. These pampered young wives were always trying to vie for power in their relationships by doing stupid things like withholding sex because their husband hadn't taken out the trash yet. They were following female instincts to find grounds on which to see themselves as wronged, which they would then try to use as leverage. In short, these wives were not self-controlled and needed a man to control them, to not tolerate their bitchiness, but how many men are up to that without getting pissed off and alienated? These guys were stud athletes. That didn't make them extraordinary men who had any special talent for dealing with irrationally demanding women.

So Morgan tried to teach the women how to control themselves. She told them not to try to gain and use manipulative power in their marriages but do the opposite. Instead of holding back affection until they got what they wanted the wives were advised to unilaterally disarm: to give freely and generously, to stop nagging, to be hot for sex regardless of what else was going on the the relationship, and it worked.

All these wives discovered that it had indeed been them who was the problem. When they became forthcoming and generous their husbands did not grab the offered territory and demand still more. They didn't become oppressive. Instead they became MORE willing to do their part of the household division of labor. They reciprocated, and were just happy that their wives were not being bitches anymore, making them want to be with their wives more and make their wives happy.

The feminists absolutely hated it. The idea that women were the problem, not men, went against all of their ideology. But there is obviously a lot of truth to it: in very many cases women ARE the problem, and for that large fraction of cases the advice to stop being a bitch is important wisdom. Neither does it do any harm to women who aren't bitches to see someone lay out the ways in which a lot of other women ruin their marriages.

Then there are the feminists, that small minority of women who embrace self-destructive bitchiness, who don't want to be givers and don't want other women to be givers, but want all women to be as demanding and stingy as possible. That's their fight against men. They are in a constant tug of war.

Alexander Rawls, The Telegraph 30 Comments [4/28/2014 3:34:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 107468

Puahater/sluthater here to shake up this echo chamber. Look David, as an obese unattractive guy, why do you devote your life’s work to being a white knight for women who only want to fuck Chads and cuckold beta male boyfriends and hubbies? Join the dark side. I invite every beta male on this blog to join the dark side and fight for men’s rights together.

You want to know why I joined the dark side? Society has treated me like shit all my life because I’m an autistic manlet. Society made me who I am. And one day I woke up and decided that I was going to stop being subservient to a society that enslaves us and treats us like yesterday’s garbage. I decided to go my own way. I don’t owe society shit. We’re going to red pill as many men and female allies (like MRA Karen Straughan) as we possibly can. Every single one of you white knight beta cucks will be red pilled and see the truth. You’ll stop being white knights. You’ll stop being cucks. You’ll be disciplines and acolytes of the Red Pill church.

And together we will put our bodies upon the gears, the levers, upon all the apparatus until we make it all stop. Until western civilization collapses. If we all go our own way and drop out of society, society will crash. Society can’t function without beta males. If it wasn’t for beta male engineers, there would be no Tinder for sluts to hook up with Chads. You beta males. You are the difference in the world. Stop being cucks. And join us.

Society has done nothing for you David. You’re obese and ugly. No girl wants to fuck you unless she wants to use you for beta bux. You owe nothing to society. Join the dark side.

Why should we be nice to girls and pretend to take an interest in their lives when these bitches fuck Chad without a condom on the first date without any effort? Why should we buy bitches dinner and drinks. Wine and dine them and jump hoops in order to get laid when Chad gets it instantly and for free? Beta males need to boycott dating and boycott society.

BETA MALES OF THE WORLD UNITE

Puahater/sluthater, We Hunted The Mammoth 70 Comments [3/30/2015 3:33:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: Skybison

Quote# 107760

The popular narrative today is that women demanded the right to vote and the menfolk just told them no until they got tired of their whining. After all, why wouldn’t a woman want more rights?

Turns out there are plenty of reasons why most women would want their own rights restricted, and they all have to do with women knowing the true nature of women. As the saying goes, “A misogynist is a man who hates women as much as women hate each other.” Women know exactly how terrible they can be. A feminist friend of mine once told me, “I envy men, because you can put two random guys in a college dorm together and they’ll get along, but that never happens with two random girls.”

The anti-suffragist organizations had the same numbers among women in America and the United Kingdom as the suffragist organizations, often even excluding men from joining. More women than men were opposed to women’s suffrage. In fairness, some of these groups supported women’s suffrage in local elections.

But all of them feared the hell that would be spawned from complete women’s suffrage, namely the soft socialism we live in today. Ever notice how everything Obama says is pro-woman but that he’s dialed-down his pro-black agenda? It’s because women are the only fans he still has left. Even the blacks don’t want him anymore.

Here’s a few reasons why women themselves did not want to involve themselves in politics.

Less Than Feminine

It’s unbecoming for a woman to be caught up in the affairs of politics. It just isn’t sexy. Nobody likes an activist. A woman doped up on Fox News or HuffPo is as disturbing as your stepmother screaming at the referee at a high school basketball game.

Women get passionate about things, often that whichever her man is passionate about. This can be a very good thing in the right contexts. In the wrong contexts, it’s terrifying. A friend of mine used to be big into Rush Limbaugh, and he decided to involve his wife in his passion. But she was a psychopath in general, and he became horrified at this terrifying right-wing beast he had created. He saw her general hatred and cruelty magnified in her political views.

[...]

Be as offended as you want, but how many women have you met who were bitter, aggressive, and antagonistic over their political views? Why would a woman want to turn into that? And how many more women than men have you met with that demeanor? Being married to a woman invested in politics or social theory is like being married to that one passive-aggressive co-worker who is best friends with the manager.

Today more women than men vote, especially single women, although married women vote more often than single women. Single women are more likely to vote Democrat than married women, and men are more likely to vote Republican than either of them. Whether it’s the financial support or the moral guidance of a husband, women tend to be right-wing when influenced by a man (hence why the left keeps trying to destroy the nuclear family).

And if you are a man who votes Democrat, then yes, you vote like a girl. And probably the kind of ugly girl no man wants to commit to instead of the young hot Presbyterian Sunday school teacher.

Part of the reason women tend to vote Democrat is because women are terrible with money and math. This is the same reason kids are taught in school to pursue their dream job instead of learning a trade that will provide a secure income.

Bad For The Family

Ultimate History Project writes,

One year later, on April 3, 1914, [Theodore Roosevelt’s cousin-in-law Kate] Roosevelt’s diary mentions Mrs. Martin speaking at the home of Mrs. Henry Seligman, wife of the millionaire banker…According to the Times, Mrs. Martin proceeded to tear to tatters the great new cause. The audience listened to her demolition of the suffrage movement “We are not merely against feminism, but for the family. We cannot reconcile feminism and the family. We hope to hear the sound of women’s feet, walking away from the factory and back to the home.”

Notice the idea of suffrage is connected to women in careers. Ideas do not exist in isolation. The barefoot and pregnant Catholic housewife with five children is a far happier person than the sulky feminist writer who retires to squeeze out a retarded child in her late 30s conceived through in vitro.

Women often don’t transition well from the office to the home, becoming bored and listless after being used to the high energy (and germophobic) environment of work. Furthermore, the reason feminist writers think careers are fulfilling is because writing feminist literature is fun. Most women (and men) don’t have careers—they have jobs where they work at the grocery store and hate life.

This claim that women’s entrance into politics and the workforce would destroy the family was not merely the anti-suffrage position. The suffragists themselves admitted that a war between the sexes was a major reason they wanted the right to vote.

[...]

If you look at history, democracy has rarely worked well. It is not rule by the majority but rule by the loudest. And who is louder than a woman? Who is more passionate? And when women follow others like lemmings, we see that women’s suffrage can quickly become destructive.

True, the monarch could be oppressive, take away your rights, censor speech, enact things that the most people are opposed to, and often make the common people miserable and impoverished. But how is that any different than modern western democracies? At least the monarch could accomplish things. Our government can’t get anything done except throw away money.

Furthermore, the monarch has the all-seeing God, his family legacy, and anxious nobles with small armies breathing down his neck to help make sure he does what’s best for the country. In the democracy, it’s greedy corporations and small minorities of activists who control the political narrative. Which is the lesser evil?

[...]

Progress

We have this idea as a society that we are constantly getting smarter with each generation. Yet if you read old books, you find that man has gradually become stupider over the centuries. Even just 100 years ago, people—both men and women—still had the common sense to not shoot themselves in the foot over women’s issues.

Today we have this sense of rights in general, like we are entitled by God at best and by Nothing at worst to have certain laws in place. Where God or Nothing promised this to us is beyond me.

The liberal atheist believes in these human rights more than anyone, even though he doesn’t believe in a god and therefore has no basis for his natural law philosophy. At the least it would make sense for him to believe in whatever is either the oldest or the most universal morality, but instead most atheists jump ahead to whatever new moral fad will fill the emptiness. Just because religion is the opium of the masses doesn’t mean mankind doesn’t need an opium.

The religious person isn’t any more off the hook. Nowhere in the Bible is tolerance, equality, or democracy mentioned, and I doubt they are very prevalent in other religions. The Bible doesn’t say much about politics, but one could make the best guess that while a king may or may not be appointed by God, a senator or president is clearly appointed by man, and therefore democracy isn’t Biblical.

Blair Naso, Return of Kings 22 Comments [4/11/2015 2:53:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 25

Quote# 119339

Women enjoy being raped

Did you know women often orgasm during rape? Isn't that weird? Most of them can't even get off with their own man, but need a creepy nigger lurking the streets at night to get it going.

James, sluthate.com 24 Comments [5/30/2016 4:58:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 123766

"No is because you don’t actually feel sorry for these people. To things like you stories of horrific assaults are just wank material for you."

I do feel sorry for people who get unjustified sentences due to maniacs like you and I don't wank on stories of horrific assaults. In fact, even as late as 2013 I COULDN'T GET IT UP WHEN A WOMAN I COERCED INTO SEX WAS THRASHING BELOW ME WHEN I TRIED TO PUT IT IN HER, despite the fact that 1. she came to my home 2. we already arranged what prize she should be given 3. she even blew me to get me hard to finally put it her 4. we even joked around later that day. This changed drastically later but what you don't understand is that most "horrific assaults" done to women today is caused by feminism, which made decent men unable to get consensual sex. That's why they must resort to rape - because consensual sex in the West is basically impossible to get unless you're really, really evil. There's exceptions but they're extremely rare.


" Hell one of your pedophile friends on you Wordpress blog asked a women victim to detail her date rape"

And what is wrong about this? Unlike maniacs like you, I don't fetishize rape to be some greatest crime and trauma on Earth. Oh, wait, neither do you if the rapist isn't a white male, and you'd let your mothers and sisters be raped by classes you see as underprivileged. But let's get back to this. This woman was under no obligation to reply so what? Btw, you know who also asks this of women who claim to have been raped? Institutions like courts do. Another thing you'd like to do away with !

"I made sure to spread his profile around to people who are willing to contact him and tell him what he outta do."

Where? To my e-mail? Nobody is even sending me any hate mail these days. Everybody knows I just get a kick out of it.

"Because of people like you I have the job that I have, out of all the hundreds of kids I’ve seen only 36 were abused by “child molesters.” "

If that's true I'd fear for the safety of anybody working with or being around such an insane, hysterical person. Adults, children, whatever. You are the ones with skeletons in your closet, I am probably not talking metaphorically. Just look at your post.

" The rest were attacked by pedophiles, pedophiles who caused lasting physical and mental injuries. Injuries so horrific some adults don’t even recover let alone a 3-year old who is repeatedly raped."

This isn't what Eivind is talking about, but now that you mention it I'll be honest - I'm not sorry. Regardless if kids were male or female, not sorry. I hate 99,9 percent of modernist Westerners and want only the worse for them. If some get abused, traumatized or even killed I don't care, no matter what the age. They would or are to grow up as bad, bad people. You are a grown up Westerner and you're a bad person. And so will/would they be.


" Pedophiles who drove 15 of these kids to kill themselves, deaths that I personally witnessed..... I’ve witnessed countless other suicide attempts by crazed victims who want their nightmares to stop....t. She killed herself when she was 10 years old not too long after I walked into an old run down shed after hearing her screaming and crying and telling the two pedophiles raping her to stop. Because of your kind she’s dead. I held her while she died and I will not forget that. I was 15-years old when she died, I still have the clothes I was wearing when she bled out. Her blood is still soaked into them and some days I have to struggle to not break down sobbing at that memory."

Holy shit I laughed so hard at this. This story continues here and here

http://theliterarylink.com/gretel.html

http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm053.html

Also, how does a 10 year-old kill herself so efficiently? Tell me more about it. Or those 15 suicides you've witnessed.

" Your kind is a blight that must be purged. If only Hitler had killed you all, if only he could’ve killed you all, if only he didn’t target Jews and Romanis."

So aside from being utterly psychotic you also lack basic knowledge of history and think 2017 world was just like 1937 world ? Had Hitler gone after pedophiles (not that me and Eivind are that) he'd kill no more than couple of hundred of people at best even including countries he conquered, at even that's probably an overstatement. He'd have to kill just convicted ones who were convicted due to actual crimes the kind of which you describe and there were really a few people like that in 1930s. It was notoriously hard to even track who is homosexual without special lists at the time and many of the names were people who were set up for some reason while some gays were protected as long as they were useful (Ernst Röhm being a prime example of this).

". I hope someone finds you and kills you and each and every one of your baby raping friends too. "

I have never raped a baby nor has any friend that I know of. I think same goes for Eivind... You, on the other hand...

"Your kind is one without remorse or sympathy, you’re incapable of understanding right from wrong or caring about the pain you cause others."

... support blacks, Muslims or any other group you think lacks privilege raping and killing even newborns because they're Sacred according to you and cannot be held accountable. I know this and you know this. I know it in the way you write phrases like "far-right" or how you mention Trump. At the same time you want white males to have no fair trials, no hearings, just off to prisons with them. So why don't you just admit what you're all about? Because, believe me, I know what you're all about. I know you. You cannot pull the veil over my eyes. I will never stop fighting you because I know what you are. Don't forget that.

"People like you destroy lives."

Good.

"What makes you think you deserve anything good in life?"

Nothing, given that I never said this. What makes you think white males will go along with your idea that they must be exterminated but Sacreds can do as they like? What makes you think modern Western women deserve not to be raped by them?


"’m not a religious man, religion is false. But if Hell is real I hope you burn there, I hope you suffer every imaginable horror and humiliation both known and unknown."

Funny, exactly something I think about you and your kind.

" The day is coming when we’ll be able to openly kill your kind again. I can’t wait for this to happen."

There was never a day when you could have killed "our kind", given that people like me and Eivind were a majority even 50 years ago in most places. Hell, I mentioned 14 year-old eight graders with fuck buddies around 12 years ago. Nobody had a problem with this. It was seen as normal. That you equate those like Eivind and me with people who rape babies while you actually support babies being raped, just by appropriate groups of people, is why you're such a laughingstock.

No, pal, the kind of people who it will be legal to kill again soon are your kind. Liberalism didn't appear for the first time in history and always ended up with slaughter of liberals, before or after they destroyed the society which nourished them. You will be exterminated by Muslims you so worship and people like me.

You are guilty of most vicious crime in the history of the world, and that is feminism. I know what it did to me and many of my friends. There will be no forgiveness.

caamib, Eivind Berge's Blog 56 Comments [1/19/2017 10:33:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 124935

[Talking about a 19 year-old girl who was raped and murdered by two immigrants in Germany]

With all this in mind, who was Maria Ladenburger? Well, her Wikipedia article says she was a German medical student who died when she was almost 20 and unmarried (search results on other sites say she was a daughter of some EU official but that is less important for the quantitative part).

So let us try to bring statistics into this equation. This amusing Durex study shows that she was likely not a virgin. These stats show that it was about 35 percent likely she would have a child out of wedlock in just 2014 (Table 3) and that her chances of being married at all were… well, getting slimmer every year, with a slight change upwards in 2014 (Table 1). That is if she would ever have kids – luckily, there’s Muslims. Now, we can speculate this or that on her personality. Obviously none of us knew her. But even using just some quickly found statistics one can easily see why Maria Ladenburger was, like most young Western European women, likely on her way to be a slut who was to be childless or have a child out of wedlock. And bear in mind, she was not even 20. All the indicators I outlined here will get worse, not better. As one character from a TV show I used to watch said “I know it’s tragic to think that way but you can’t argue with the fucking logic !”

Qualitatively, things are a bit more tricky as they go into the emotional aspect which can’t be expressed with just numbers. But I’ll argue that they’re covered well enough. Most decent, moral men have their horror stories with women. Along with my February 2014 text, I highly recommend these stories written on CoAlpha forums in September 2015. One of the worst problems with anecdotal, qualitative evidence is that you can always find some moron whose stories with Western women were happy and most of our idiocratic society will find his story to be more uplifting and credible because the author is mainstream, even if it’s obvious by the way he acts later that his success was due to the fact that he was a massive asshole and as dumb as dirt. But, I won’t go into that any longer, seeing I already covered it and concluded that one must make their own conclusions on whether or not today’s Western women are worth it.

Maria Ladenburger was likely to become everything or at least most of things this blog is so vehemently against. Her parents’ money would likely ensure that she is protected from any consequences of her future shenanigans and that she is able to proceed with these on a high level. She was likely rotten even at the time of her death and even more likely to become rotten very soon. And she was, like current women in Trump’s USA, not to improve if some right wing party had won the elections. Had she lived, she would very likely be a source of trauma for every decent man in Germany (well, um, both of them) who was unlucky enough to see potential for anything more serious than careless pump and dump in her. She would almost certainly be a pest, let us be honest, Westerners. She is the kind of girl who would reject you for treating her respectfully so you can be called an asshole and a “nice guy” by her brain-dead army of liberal virginal fanatics (whose ultimate prize isn’t pussy anyway but being loyal soldiers of their own tragedies) if you object in any way while the moron with an IQ of 20 fucking her somehow has “actual personality” – a stance these loyal liberals would hold as long as those being annoyed with Maria are members of the appropriate groups one is allowed to hate (you can usually tell them by the color of their skin and lack of gay mannerisms).

With its brain-dead youth, assholish majority of population and complete internalization of cancerous social policies like feminism West is dying old man. So Maria was a sad but a necessary victim of a situation where West has forfeited its reproductive, economic and every other future to a stronger group like Muslims.

Caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 42 Comments [2/26/2017 6:58:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 123582

All sex is validating the female

If you have sex with a female, you are validating her existance. Regardless of paying or the normie way. You are telling her she is valuable for having a vagina. You are engaging in ego masturbation everytime you look at porn, google hot women, flirt with females, create an okcupid account, tinder account or w/e else. This is why in order to not validate the female further you must be alpha. You cannot engage in niceness with the female. You have to be distant but make her reliant on you. She must need you in her life so she doesn't cuck you for chad. You have to stop complimenting her. She must compliment you. Make her validate you. Give her stockholm syndrome, it will make her enamored with you and reduce her validation. She will become weakened mentally as she becomes nothing more than a mental slave.


Incel_Death1, /r/incels 53 Comments [1/11/2017 2:14:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 116830

Can't read the whole article till later but that's a very irritating little jingle they got going:

"Whatever we wear, wherever we go, yes means yes and no means no"

Well how about

"Liar, liar, bras on fire"?

But if you really want to see the incel revolution, you got to start working on trippy little chants like these:

"However we look, whatever our height, sex with girls is our human right!"

Any takers?

Antikurva, Sluthate.com 43 Comments [2/16/2016 2:59:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 122467

Politics is downstream of the sexual market (which is why electoral puzzles like women voting in greater numbers for the gibs and virtue signaling party is best explained as a biological repercussion of human sexuality).

All politics is gonadal. Given this reality, the most effective political persuasion techniques are those that evoke the ancient rhythms of the sexual market. Converting deeply gay, male Hillary partisans to The Trumpening is not likely in the cards but, if sufficiently shamed and ostracized by effective COPROP that leverages the power of anxiety over one’s sexual market status, many nominal males who plan to vote for Inmate Hillary can be dissuaded from exercising their right to notarize the featherweight class of their shrunken scrotes.

[...]

Even faggy Millennial manlets with incipient bitch tits will feel a cringe of shame if they are forced to identify with the beta lapdog in the bottom pic.

Just as a healthy and strong society with rock-ribbed shitlord norms can keep gays far enough in the closet that their petri dish flamboyance doesn’t creep out the kids, so can a fearless embrace of immutable and omnipotent sexual market law — and the exploitation thereof — cow mincing betaboys from pulling the lever for thecunt.

One sackless wonder at a time. Eventually, if enough manginas fear shitlord ridicule more than SJW shrieking, their self-respect will do the swelling their ovaries can’t do.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 30 Comments [11/12/2016 10:51:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 104625

It’s always funny to see women at each other’s throats. Now that so many women have power, we no longer have political mud slinging, but rather something even better: political mud wrestling.

I suppose this is one thing we men can now start to sit back and enjoy as the ship of state slowly slides under the waves. For all their “you go girl” solidarity and fist-pumping on Oprah, women’s cooperation and claims of common interests is a big sham. When Mistuh Gubmint Sugahdaddy’s cash runs out they’ll all be at each other’s throats, blaming one another with as much vigor as a cheating wife blames her husband.

Welmer, The Spearhead 14 Comments [11/10/2014 4:08:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 111736

Title of the posting: How come there are no women in this "all-female" Ghostbusters?

I've read that that this will be an "all-female" Ghostbusters.

I've seen a couple of publicity photos for this film.

In those photos, I did not see a single woman.

All I saw were four or so butt-ugly, monstrous, masculine brutes.

Does it not stand to reason that an "all-female" Ghostbusters should actually have women in it?

Someone messed up there, big-time!

Navaros, IMDb message board for Ghostbusters (2016) 38 Comments [8/13/2015 2:56:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Kuno

Quote# 122583

[In July, Kathryn B. H. Clancy and her co-authors Robin G. Nelson, Julienne N. Rutherford and Katie Hinde published a survey of 666 field-based scientists in the journal PLoS One and reported that 26 percent of the female scientists surveyed had been sexually assaulted during fieldwork.]

Of course, the push to encourage women in science is only going to cause more such sexual assaults to take place, which is one more reason why it is a bad idea. Science doesn't need more women, especially if more women in the field are going to help transform otherwise good male scientists into rapists and sex criminals.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 30 Comments [11/18/2016 2:45:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: David

Quote# 123293

[In response to a post by Kitty Kaboom, where she talked about her two disabled children]

"It doesn't matter what you look like."
"Don't let shitwits like caamib... convince you otherwise"

That's not really necessary, dear. I am a staunch anti-lookist.

"It's the content of your thoughts, words and emotions that people care about"

Absolutely, but not if you have anything like

" Depth. Compassion. Empathy. Intellect."

These things are extremely repellent to vermin like modern Western women.


Also, I hope both of your kids die, you filthy cunt.

caamib, FSTDT comments 41 Comments [12/29/2016 4:15:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125541

[Comment under "Informative Pics for MGTOW"]



VileNord, Men Going Their Own Way 18 Comments [3/19/2017 1:52:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 104821

If women are not obligated to give sex to their husbands, what are their marriage obligations?

The marriage deal used to be as follows :

Husband provides resources and protection

Wife provides children and homemaking

Nowadays husbands are still held under coercion to provide resources and protection, but wives do whatever the fuck they want. No wonder there's a crisis.
That redpill woman you're quoting knows what's up. If she can say no to sex, why wouldn't her husband say no to being her money faucet? What will she do once her fertile years are gone? Who will support her? The traditional marriage deal is actually skewed in favor of women in that husbands are kept under coercion until the wife dies although she usually has long outlasted her usefulness in the marriage deal. She's just being given stuff for providing nothing in return once she has produced and reared the all important children.

The current western marriage deal only exists as it is because the State is enforcing it to be that unbalanced. It uses reproductive sexual relationships as a wealth extraction tool. If you don't want to end up living with cats, time to get back to traditional marriage.

Totorox, r/TheBluePill 27 Comments [11/22/2014 6:02:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 123274

How can normies be happy having a "modern" daughter? It's like being cuckolded.

This is a genuine question. I've been thinking about this for some time. It's the ultimate form of cuckoldry, honestly. I mean, you try to raise her properly, provide for her and share her burdens, emotional or financial, for so many years, and when she gets to her prime ages, she starts "exploring her body". In other words, being a worthless slag being pumped and dumped by Chads, gagging on their erect members as they push her head further into their penis, gargling their cum with joy, screaming for them to fuck her brains out while they press her head to the ground with their foot, her jumping on their 12 inch dongs as she calls them "daddy", catering to their every sexual whim to continue being with them, getting drunk in parties and gangbanging with total strangers... Being a worthless dishrag to be used and discarded, until the clock starts ticking and she gets with a beta cuckold to provide for her. This is the life of many "modern age" female.

My question is, how can so many of you normies be happy having a "western", a "modern" daughter after so many years of raising and caring for her selflessly? How can you not get sick seeing her turn into a slut for public use? How can you sit still and say "this is fine" while she's nothing more than a object for Chads to use and throw away like a cumrag? How can you accept her serial "monogamy", watching her jump from cock to cock? It makes me sick to my stomach. Answers are welcomed.

knajjd11, /r/incels 33 Comments [12/27/2016 8:33:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126176

The Sexual Revolution of the 60s was worse than the Holocaust

Sure, in the Holocaust, a lot of people died and it was pretty uncomfortable. But it was over in a couple of years and ever since then J-words have been living with unparalleled special treatment that only women exceed.
The Sexual Revolution was far worse. It undone centuries of social progress. Every achievement we'd made since the 1780s just disappeared. It condemned literally millions upon millions of men throughout the ages to a life of inceldom. It destroyed standards and morals by normalising shit music, drugs and the "club and casual sex" degenerate lifestyle. It was the progenitor of feminism which is and always has been an anti-male/anti-ugly male hate movement.
In short, the Sexual Revolution was our very own Holocaust but we're unlucky enough that it never ends, and we must live in the concentration camp of the degenerate modern day for our whole lives with the knowledge that things will only get worse. Already polyamory is being normalised and considered by sluts to be a valid form of relationship. Serial monogamy (basically the same thing) was normalised a while ago.
We're absolutely fucked, incels. Chad has won. We are hated because we're ugly, and that's the top and bottom of it. Personality means nothing if a slut can go to a club and have sex with a different alpha male every night.

IAmWhatYouMadeMe9, r/incels 22 Comments [4/9/2017 2:50:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 125702

There are 2 ways to Eradicate Slutiness from the Female Race

1. Remove them from society entirely. They never have any interaction with males, ever. They do dirty work in internment camps, and are artificially inseminated.
2. Remove them from society temporarily, until they are ready for an arranged marriage. During this time, they are constantly belittled and mentally abused to the point where they have no self esteem. Then, they will not have the courage or confidence to whore around.

(Comment by ban_collector)
Excellent ideas. Most of us incels would probably prefer the 2nd option because we get a wife, but maybe the first is more wise in the long run. The government will have to fund research to create artificial waifus for us in that case.

ItheIthe and ban_collector, /r/incels 19 Comments [3/24/2017 5:23:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 116679

ThePUAMole;

The war is over: the feminists have defeated the PUAs

Look at the scoreboard, guys: the PUAs (even the good ones) are down thirty points.

You can't stop feminism because the world runs on sex. Interestingly, this means that, just as men argued over how to rule the world in the past, with the women on the sidelines, the opposite will be the case now, except to the extent that the women attempt to recruit men, which is of course unsustainable, as there's little reward for the men other than not being destroyed, and for that they can just go MGTOW.

Nihilism+;

Well look at you, being all smart and shit.

Actually nope, sorry. Still retarded and autistic. PUAs and Feminists are incahoots with one another, its as clear as day. The chicks who are on PUA infield videos? Pretty sure they are paid actresses who also more than likely post feminist blogs dissing men and wanting to rule the world as well. Cycle goes like this:

Incel pays money for PUA shit------>Incel tries PUA shit but gets buried by feminists--------->feminists posts about PUAs (who they are secretly dating) to get the PUA network's name out------->PUAs attack feminists to get the feminists name out------->incel on the feminists side now side with PUAs cuz they feel betrayed by feminists false advice to white knight chicks into bed with them----->incel pays money for PUA shit.

And on and on. Its a vicious cycle man.

Feminists, PUAs and Chads will rule everything in a number of years. Its only a matter of time. Anyone with any belief that even strays one degree from PUAism or Feminism will be crushed decisively.

ThePUAMole & Nihilism+, Sluthate.com 16 Comments [2/10/2016 4:24:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 108789

With the rise of gynocentrism and leisure culture, the harsh penalties for violating the andromarriage laws began to erode – as our preferences for expanding the purview of women increased we became less willing to hold women to any standards or responsibilities. We now see women as lifelong children: too weak, frail, stupid and mercurial to be trusted with adult responsibility when it comes to adhering to the strict requirements of an andromarriage contract. Western countries now look on places that stone adulterers as barbaric even though we were killing them ourselves not that long ago. A woman stoned to death is a woman held to adult standards that feminists now reject.

August Lovenskiolds, a voice for men 20 Comments [5/21/2015 1:38:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 126218

Women didn't want you because you respect them and you didn't want to rape because you know nothing about women. If you knew anything about women you'd know that you caused them more suffering by just existing like that and not raping them.

Caamib, FSTDT 25 Comments [4/11/2017 9:12:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 119384

Pakistan: Council of Islamic Ideology proposes ‘light beating’ of wife for defying husband

In a bizarre move, the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) has proposed its own Women Protection Bill, recommending ‘a light beating’ for the wife if she defies her husband.

The council has proposed that a husband should be allowed to ‘lightly’ beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per his desires, turns down the demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods.

It further suggests that beating is also permissible if a woman does not observe Hijab, interacts with strangers, speaks loud enough that she can easily be heard by strangers and provides monetary support to the people without taking consent of her spouse.

It says that there should be a ban on co-education after primary education, ban on women from taking part in military combat, ban on welcoming foreign delegations, interacting with males and making recreational visits with ‘Na-Mehram’.

It further states that female nurses should not be allowed to take care of male patients and recommends that women should be banned from working in advertisements. The council recommends that an abortion after 120 days of conceiving should be declared ‘murder’.

However, it says a woman can join politics and contract a ‘Nikah’ without the permission of parents. The bill suggests that anyone, who tries to force women to marry with the Holy Quran or facilitate this, should be awarded 10-year imprisonment.

Similarly, the proposed bill says if any non-Muslim woman is forced to convert then the oppressor will be awarded three-year imprisonment while the woman will not be murdered if she reverts to her previous faith.

The Express Tribune quoted sources as saying that this proposed bill is under consideration by the body and further deliberation will continue today when CII chairman Muhammad Khan Sheerani will give final recommendations with the consent of other members.

The three-member delegation of Justice (Retd.) Manzoor Hussain Gilani, Noor Ahmed Shahtaz and Muhammad Abdullah yesterday raised objections on many clauses of the proposed bill and urged the chairman to moderate the same.

They said the bill was drafted by Mufti Imdadullah, a member who belongs to JUI-F, adding that the above three members have insisted the chairman and Imdad follow the current circumstances while drafting the law. They said the bill was discussed by a panel comprising men as the only female CII member, Sameeha Raheel Qazi, was not present yesterday.

The bill was drafted after the CII rejected Punjab’s controversial Protection of Women against Violence Act (PPWA) 2015, terming it un-Islamic. The CII will now forward its proposed bill to the Punjab Assembly.

Council of Islamic Ideology, The Indian Express 18 Comments [6/1/2016 2:43:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 126294

Happy international cunt’s day

In honor of international cunt’s day this week, I have decided I am going to write another honoring hero’s post. This week, our hero, who is one of the greatest hero’s to ever live IMHO, is George Sodini.

For those who do not recall, George Sodini was a 48 year old incel, who tried everything to find a woman, and got rejected each and every time. He even tried PUA and went to bootcamps, blowing his money to get his head filled with BS advice, which did not work. One day, George got tired of all the rejection and instead of suffering his fate of spending the rest of his life alone, he decided to go and do something about it. George Sodini got revenge by going on a rampage at a gym, shooting up a woman’s fitness class. The only mistake Sodini made, was not racking up a large enough body count. George was a fairly well to do man, having over $250,000 in cash stashed as well as outright owning his own home. Sodini should have used this money to buy some bigger guns, and perhaps, learned to make some bombs to really up the body count. Of course, in the aftermath, once the whining and crying settled, the media started slandering him and twisting his situation by saying he was only after 20 year old women and if he went after women his own age, he would have found somebody. Oh boy, doesn’t this sound familiar. I suggest you go back and read my post so titled. Anything to take all the blame off the poor wimminz. Any and all responsibility is kryptonite to today’s cunt, almost as much as the incel man is. George Sodini would have gotten rejected if he approached 20 year olds, 30 year olds, 40 year olds, 50 year olds. Maybe if he tried approaching 60 year old women, one would have given him a chance, but even that is doubtful. Bottom line is George Sodini had NO chance with ANY women, since he was introverted, quirky, and was not a badboy or thug. As if all this were not bad enough, to add injury to insult, he had to deal with the mockery from men as well as women of being a 48 year old, never married incel. I know from experience that in the part of the country George Sodini lived in, this alone would exclude you from just about all social gatherings, unless of course, you lie, but sooner or later the truth would come out. Why couldn’t just one girl have given him a chance? Oh, because that would be Ewwww, disgusting, now wouldn’t it cunts? Well, when they were cleaning the contents of your head off the floor, I am sure that some poor aftermath cleaning crew was saying the same thing about you. Well, cunts, enjoy your international women’s day. BTW your so called “strike” made absolutely no difference to the economy. You cunts are only good for one thing, and you know it o!o.

rantsofanincel, Rants Of An Incel 15 Comments [4/13/2017 9:54:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124097

Ehhh I say it as it is: I don't care about the victims. All I care is that [Elliot Rodger] helped us gain a reputation that is better then the one we had before. Sure innocent people died but innocent people die everyday. Fuck, innocent babies get aborted everyday and the ones who are against this are under attack.

EconomicsofSex, /r/incels 13 Comments [1/31/2017 11:06:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125134

Stupid cunt was trying to roast a fellow incel friend and I unleashed on her

Yesterday I went to the shops with a friend of mine and since my friend and I are trying to grow out of inceldom we were trying to make small talk with good looking girls and my friend when buying a movie ticket saw a relatively good looking girl, probably around a 6-7/10. He went up to her when buying a ticket and I sunk into the backdrop as I let him try to do his thing, the typical "Do I know you from somewhere?" routine and things, I thought, were going well. She was about to give the ticket over and held it back and asked "Are you hitting on me?" he responded with something like "well yeah I saw you and I went to this register just because I thought you were pret-" she cuts him off with "Ohhhh 'kaaay..well can you not? I'd never dare to be seen with someone as ugly as you her friend leans in and starts giggling. Did you even know if I had a boyfriend? Because I do, so please fuck off."

I was standing there in shock and then I finally burst with rage, asking her how much of a cunt she is and how fucked up her face was. I'm a decent looking incel so she couldn't really say much. I laid into her about her disgusting frizzy hair and her crooked sickening nose and how small her tits are and that she should be happy any guys hit on her whatsoever. My heart was rapid as I stuttered out insults about her disgusting skin tone and acne. She eventually walked away and as we walked away I turned around and she had her head in her hands sobbing and her coworker was trying to console her. As soon as we got out of the movie she was gone, I assume she got sent home.

Stupid fucking cunt, this is what you get. I'm sick of it. I'm pissed and I'm not taking this shit anymore, roasties will get fucking demolished anytime they try to be cunts.

Women are shit and after yesterday I have given up on the "hunt"

incel_INHELL, /r/incels 37 Comments [3/4/2017 5:21:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125346

If a woman doesn't masturbate when looking at you then she doesn't like you

She is wondering why subhumans like you exist on earth. If she does like you she will get nervous and horny and start touching her hair or cross her arms or grab her hand in a desperate attempt to prevent herself from touching her vagina while getting off mentally at the same time. It's really obvious and kinda cute.

thegambler952, /r/incels 33 Comments [3/12/2017 1:13:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125782

Women don't like being called "female", I thought of some of other words that might be used.

• wimminz
• whores
• bitches
• cunts
• cum dumpsters
• baby factories
• penis caps
• penis gyms
• kitchen slaves
• female humanoid organisms
• carbon rich envaginated structures
• the annoying, dumb, inferior pieces of flesh around the vagina that don't invent or discover things
• cocksleeve
• roastie
• sperm garage
• Harpies
• The niggers of gender
• jizzum snorter

I couldn't think of anymore. Feel free to add more. I really do hate them with a burning passion.

kazcovic, /r/incels 18 Comments [3/28/2017 4:59:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 126279

From comics, movies, anime, gaming, and now the more recent kids shows, feminists will use any kind of tactic to promote their evil. Stories like Rapunzel or The Sleeping Beauty have been a part of our childhood, teaching us about gender roles and the importance of them. Now they have been changed in various ways to suit modern women, giving them unrealistic expectations of what they can be. Here are nine characters that show how they have infiltrated entertainment.

Steven Universe

The show deals with an entire species that is genderless but has feminine traits (female human forms), Steven is a male protagonist that is not masculine in a lot of ways. Rather than being the strong fighter type, he acts through femininity despite being male. He cries for help from women rather than helping himself. The show contains trans, queer and homosexual characters which is typical for a show like this. They have women of different sizes and has quite a dark story line for a show aimed for children. Cartoon Network is now giving a way for brainwashing, glorifying obese women and unhealthy diets.

They even place the emphasis on disguised leftist concepts like:

Tolerance – Praising of everything non-white, non-male and non-heterosexual
Minority – non-whites, non-male and degenerates
Inclusiveness – Accepting everything non-white and degenerate
Emancipation – Disregarding rules made by conservative males

But despite all these teachings, SJWs bullied a Steven Universe artist to attempt suicide because she drew Rose (an obese female character) too thin. Hypocritical? Yes. It certainly has one of the most cancerous fanbases, consisting of bronies and white knights.

Wonder Woman

Not even girls want to be girls so long as our feminine archetype lacks force, strength, and power. Not wanting to be girls, they don’t want to be tender, submissive, peace-loving as good women are. Women’s strong qualities have become despised because of their weakness. The obvious remedy is to create a feminine character with all the strength of Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman.”

– William Moulton Marston, in a 1943 issue of The American Scholar.

Comics publisher Max Gaines asked him to create a new superhero for their comics, to fill the void he felt existed with something new. The creator knew that he wanted his hero to embrace love over violence, and to value peace over war. He assumed that women value love and peace. He valued independent, educated, and unconventional women.

Wonder Woman remains a feminist icon 75 years after her creation, because she symbolizes the idea of female domination. According to NY Post, Wonder Woman was not ‘feminist’ enough for Social Justice Warriors, because SJWs and feminists are never happy with anything in society until white men are silenced. Most wonder woman comics were terrible, but the media keeps pushing it on readers that they HAVE to give in.

BatGirl

Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon is allegedly a woke male feminist ally. He’s a mangina allegedly known for directing “strong female characters”. His characters are unrealistic as women simply can never be tough. He cares about fake women’s issues like the pay gap and the alleged success of lady Ghostbusters. Joss is directing Batgirl, the story about a super heroine who is basically Batman but a woman. Currently he’s facing back-lash on Twitter, but in smaller amounts due to more and more people accepting these kind of reboots.

Overwatch

This game is tainted by women who blame their problems on men. Basically, every character in Overwatch has different victory pose animations that a player can unlock and choose from. And for the time-traveling character Tracer (one of the female characters in the game), her victory pose gives players a wonderful view of her buttocks, clad in skin-tight leggings. Obviously, if men are enjoying something there must be feminist intervention, so Blizzard changed her appearance and stated:

We’ll replace the pose. We want *everyone* to feel strong and heroic in our community. The last thing we want to do is make someone feel uncomfortable, under-appreciated or misrepresented. Apologies and we’ll continue to try to do better.

Women expose themselves to men in conventions, and when they are assaulted they complain that “men should respect women,” even when their own clothes were designed to attract men. But when a character in a video game wears skimpy clothing, there is an outright backlash against it. Overwatch is even taking strides to be LGBT inclusive. This marks the end of straight white man in entertainment.

Wandering Son

Wandering Son follows two fifth graders who do not identify with the genders they were assigned at birth. Shuichi Nitori identifies as a girl, and Yoshino Takatsuki identifies as a boy. This series marks the end of an era, modern anime has come to suit feminist tastes. The rest is pretty self explanatory.

Splash

The 80s film, starring Tom Hanks and Daryl Hannah, is set for a reboot with Channing Tatum starring as the “merman”. The original Splash was about a man, Allen Bauer (Hanks), who falls in love with the mermaid (Daryl Hannah) who rescued him when he was a boy. Their relationship is hampered somewhat by the fact that the mermaid (who later names herself Madison) has to return to the sea after just a few short days, and also by the deranged scientist determined to prove that merpeople are real by throwing water at her.

Since the announcement, many feminists have been celebrating the gender swap on social media – particularly Tatum’s casting as a merman as some kind of feminist victory… but why? Because of the casting of a white, straight male in a role that was originally held by a woman. Hollywood’s content has become more man-hating than ever before. Seeing men in feminine roles is a way of brainwashing men to be submissive and less masculine.

Gender swapping is fast becoming a fail-safe way for Hollywood to shut up anyone who kicks off about equality without actually having to write anything new: Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Sleeping Beauty, 101 Dalmatians, Ghostbusters. All these films have either been made or are in the works and all of them have some kind of “feminist twist”. I’ve seen these gender bends in anime too, although no one seems to notice because anime gender bending is normalized.

Undertale

Your character is non-ambiguous (genderless) and non-white, which one could assume it is Asian or Mexican. They never refer to you as “him” or “her”. Despite having a small amount of characters, it managed to include homosexual relationships and a transgender robot. There are more homosexual couples than their opposite counterparts, and both the prominent female characters break out of gender roles. Undyne being the best fighter in the underground, another unrealistic feminist expectation that women can be better than men.

Do you see where “progressiveness” in gaming is really heading? Because the game pushes “progressive propaganda”. One of the major themes of the game that people have been gloating about is the notion that gay relationships are wonderful and perfect, straight relationships are doomed, diversity is strength, promoting inter-species romantic relationships, and it’s primarily because of this thematic content that the game gets praised. That is why Tumblr is spamming the votes, and the media is circle-jerking over the game. Nearing the end of the game I dawned upon the similarities of this game and Steven Universe. There’s nothing particularly special about the game except for discreetly lecturing you about homosexuality and political correctness.

Sailor Moon

It redefined the “magical girl” genre in its native Japan and its overseas influence has shown up in girl-power shows like The Powerpuff Girls and is the definition of a feminist anime. Haruka and Michiru, the series’ Sailor Uranus and Neptune, were a lesbian couple who helped girls around the world come to terms with their sexuality (lesbian propaganda). The series also makes a point of looking down on femininity, by showing how the less feminine girls have trouble coping with gender roles, like how Makoto learned to cook because she was teased for being a tomboy.
Though, I somewhat find it astonishing that the creator of the site anime feminist doesn’t care about “fanservice”, which is short softcore porn scenes, it occured to me because they know about the female supremacy in anime.

Life Is Strange

The creators of the game met with resistance to make the protagonist female. It’s a story about a girl named Max who learns that she can time travel. Life is Strange are some of the few games that are telling women’s untold stories in ways that make it seem as if women have it harder.

It’s simply a game made to exaggerate and show how cruel men can be to women (almost every man in the game is either a loser or a woman beating trash). It attempts to lecture you and say things like “these men need to be in check” whenever it finds the chance to. This game was published by SQUARE ENIX who also published Tomb Raider. Why is it that those people who push equality so much then decide to make a game where it’s about the girl, never around the male?

Conclusion

Modern entertainment is becoming more about social justice than hardware, software, story, gameplay, or animation, while we get to endure feminists complain about everything they don’t like, ruining entertainments we were once able to enjoy.

Ryan Ashville, Return of Kings 25 Comments [4/13/2017 1:49:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 123378

As had been previously explained, America had pretty much for all intents and purposes died by 1920 and the disastrous decision of the 19th Amendment, though some opinions place the beginning of the end even earlier, in 1800s. So in this aspect, which is a crucial one, America will not return to sanity. Trump won’t abolish women’s suffrage, he won’t bring women back into kitchens, none of this will happen. Did the Bush presidency restore the value of American women? Did the Reagan presidency stabilize what was a rapidly plummeting value of American women in the 80s (of course, with certain noble exceptions of women in backwoods areas, exceptions which still exist today) ? No, the battle is lost. The best aspect in terms of women will be, as Roosh says, to make it easier to find a fellow traveler. But even there you need to be careful which traveler to choose.

In terms of feminism, SJWs, alt-right etc, all of these things are kinda irrelevant ultimately if you look at the paragraph above, which outlines the real crux of the issue. Without abolishing women’s suffrage, without a hasty return to strict patriarchy, nothing of real relevance will happen. And we know Trump could never do that

caamib, Caamib blog 35 Comments [1/1/2017 11:14:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125499

Much as I like to trumpet the importance of a woman's right to choose all things at all times, there's one choice I simply cannot understand: the choice of an otherwise sane and healthy woman not to have children.

If a would-be mother is a singleton of 40 who decides to have a baby without a partner, I might wish she'd thought of it sooner and prepared for it better - but I understand.

If she's half of a lesbian couple who 'borrows' the wherewithal, I might cross my fingers that the child is not teased at school - but I understand. Even if she's a 66-year- old pregnant pensioner, threatening to turn motherhood into a freak show, I might (indeed, I do) think she's monstrously selfish and dangerously wrong - but again, more or less, I understand.

Yet if she says she hasn't a shred of maternal feeling in her, moreover, if she says she would prefer to concentrate on her career and that a child would only get in the way of it, then my head might acknowledge her right to do so. But my heart whispers: 'Lady, you're weird.'

It was welcome news, therefore, to discover this week that I am not alone. Research conducted over six years shows that far from bosses and colleagues always being suspicious of a working mother, the opposite is becoming true: it is the childless woman who is regarded as cold and odd.

As a result, it is these single-track careerists who are increasingly likely to be vilified, refused jobs and denied promotion because many employers believe them to lack what the study calls 'an essential humanity'. And I know exactly what they mean.

In the little hothouse of my own trade as a hack, I play a game with myself. Reading all the other female scribblers, sometimes with grudging admiration and sometimes none at all, I try to guess from their expression of their world view whether or not they are mothers.

I haven't - yet - been wrong. Now, with MPs so much in the headlines, I've extended the game and started to guess about the women among them, too.

As far as I can tell, my score is also pretty high there - even though it's just a feeling. On both sides of the political divide, as with the writers, it's not what MPs say or do, so much as how they go about it.

'Mothers bring something extra'

And if that touch of 'essential humanity' - or its absence - colours such notably tough professions, it's hardly surprising that employers are starting to notice that the same applies across the spectrum of workplaces.

Of course, we need not be silly about it.

Nobody wishes to see a female soldier in combat with a six-week-old infant in one arm and a rifle in the other.

Or a high-flier working 20-hour days while still breast-feeding. Or the mother of a small brood taking on any job of such erratic hours that she cannot promise them when or even if she'll be home.

But most jobs aren't like that - and most children don't stay babies for long.

Besides which, in my experiences both as a colleague and an employer, I have found that mothers almost always bring something extra to the job, to the benefit of all.

It's not the mothers, for a start, who are going to turn up late and hungover after a night on the razz; they'll have been up, dressed and alert for hours, having cooked a family breakfast and delivered their children to school. On time.

It's not the mothers, usually, who run the office bitch-fest.

They're not there to compete for the attentions of the male executives; they're there to get out of the house; they're there because they genuinely enjoy some adult company; and they're there because they have mouths to feed other than their own and shoes to buy for someone else's feet.

Two-thirds of working mothers, a recent survey found, could not provide for the children they love in the manner they would wish if they lost their jobs. So there's incentive for you.

They will, it is true, snatch time off for poorly children and Christmas carol services. And it's true they will insist that, in return for arriving on the dot of 9am, they must also leave on the dot of 5pm.

But rarely have I encountered a mother who did not offer to make up time lost, often in lunch hours. As for leaving on time, put enough mothers together in one workplace and you'll get rid of the ghastly ethos of 'presenteeism', whereby people vie for plaudits based solely on how late - albeit often uselessly - they hang around the office.

The prioritising that may baffle other people is a cinch for a woman who has spent years juggling a household. Negotiating skills? A request for 10 per cent off an overdue invoice is nothing to a woman who has had to broker a deal on Britain's Got Talent versus bedtime.

When it comes to emergencies, if you have run all the way to a clinic with a terrified toddler vomiting down your neck then, trust me, a package delayed in transit is a piece of cake. And if those are the tangibles, the intangibles - the 'essential humanity' - are more important still.

You cannot be a mother without knowing something about selflessness, compassion, generosity, commitment, fierce loyalty and plain hard work. You cannot - surely - be a boss and not value assets such as those in your staff.

Nor is it the boss who pays the price for the extras a mother brings with her; she's the one who pays for that. Enough reams have been written about the long hours of slog it takes to run a home and hold down a job at the same time. Yet still we keep doing it because we want our work, our independence and our money.

But, more than all the things we want, we actually need our children; they complete us as women, they are our light and our love and our legacy.

We feel desperately sorry for those who yearn for children they cannot have; the unwilling barren, if you will. But when we meet a woman who chooses her childlessness in the belief that there is something out there worth more, we smile politely even while - once again - our guts whisper: 'Lady, you're weird.'

So three cheers for the employers who are catching on, the ones who don't want to people their workforces with the cold, the calculating, the sad and the mad. The only question is: what took you so long?

Carol Sarler, Daily Mail 16 Comments [3/18/2017 2:52:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126675

In 2008, writing under the username FredFredrickson, Fisher posited that the notion that “rape is bad” was not an absolute truth. He wrote, “I’m going to say it—Rape isn’t an absolute bad, because the rapist I think probably likes it a lot. I think he’d say it’s quite good, really.”

Though he stated he “doesn’t advocate breaking the law,” Fisher said online in 2012 that a 40-year-old man asking to see the breasts of a 15-year-old wasn’t creepy. Instead, he said it was “evolutionarily advantageous and perfectly natural.”

As a candidate for state representative, Fisher proposed bringing concerns about the supposed plague of false rape accusations into the statehouse. Hosting a forum on Reddit under the username RobertFisherforNH, Fisher sought ideas to prevent “innocent people [from] receiving jail time.” He argued that because in rape cases “police err on the side of caution,” and show a high level of support for victims, the system was “susceptible to abuse” by women.

Robert Fisher, State Representative NH 9th district, We Hunted The mammoth 13 Comments [4/26/2017 12:13:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 125505

Women who support gay rights but refuse to have anal sex are the weakest race.What do you think your gay besties are doing behind closed doors, honey? Holding hands while humming "It's Raining Men?"

Matt Forney, Gab 19 Comments [3/18/2017 1:18:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 24448

We a very happy young couple. My wife is a submissive wife and we believe that the man is the Head of the Household. We are seeking a submissive live-in to be part of our family. She needs to be under 30 b/c she cannot be older than my wife. She needs to be able to perform light housework, child care, and other duties.

We are both college educated with my wife attending medical school. Our marriage is Christian based and the sub-in-training must have the same beliefs.

She must be willing to be trained as a submissive in the house. There is no sex involved with the husband. At the moment, no sex is planned with the wife but that may change.

The sub must be willing to be disciplined and trained by the HOH as he sees fit. We would like to move slowly and have a lot of conversations via the internet before we would even think about talking live.

At the moment, we can only provide room and board so the sub must be willing to work part-time. All that could change when the wife b/c a doctor.
Please email pics if you are interested or want more information.

pers-320555401, craigslist 44 Comments [4/30/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Father of the Year Award

May Bubba exert "poetic justice" on you!

Quote# 125565

A dad from Texas has been convicted for forcing his 16-year-old daughter to become a prostitute as a punishment for being sexually active. The 46-year-old Scot Rodney Robinson was found guilty of first-degree felony charge and sent away to jail. He plead guilty for forcing her into prostitution at truck stops.

According to KRTK, when the father found out that his daughter was already sexually active at age 16 he wanted to punish her for it. The young girl said that her dad forced her to “service” truck drivers and even took the money she earned.

“He basically told her, ‘If you’re gonna be a wh**e, we’re gonna treat ya like one,'” said JoAnne Musick, chief of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office Sex Crimes Division.

Robinson has a thick criminal record and has already faced charges related to burglary, criminal trespass, drug possession and auto theft.

Scot Rodney Robinson, Buzz Fanzine 19 Comments [3/21/2017 2:23:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 118973

There are very solid rational, Constitutional, and historical reasons for denying female suffrage. John Adams summarized them best in his famous written exchange with his wife:

"I long to hear that you have declared an independency. And, by the way, in the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors.

"Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands.

"Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation."
- Abigail Adams, 31 March 1776

"Depend upon it, we know better than to repeal our masculine systems. Although they are in full force, you know they are little more than theory. We dare not exert our power in its full latitude. We are obliged to go fair and softly, and, in practice, you know we are the subjects.

"We have only the name of masters, and rather than give up this, which would completely subject us to the despotism of the petticoat, I hope General Washington and all our brave heroes would fight."
- John Adams, 14 April 1776

Events have proven John Adams correct. Free men are accustomed to voluntarily limiting the use of their power and not pushing it to the full extent of its capabilities. Women, to say the least, are not. Just as an angry woman does not pull her punches, women in politics do not restrain their instincts to attempt to control the uncontrollable. Abigail Adams is projecting: she wrongly assumes all men would be tyrants if they could because she knows that is true of herself and other women. And women do not hold themselves bound by laws in any case, regardless of whether they have had voice or representation or not. They are bound by fear.

This is why a nation that wishes to remain wealthy and free does not permit female involvement in its governance, and why totalitarians from the Italian Fascists to the Soviet Bolsheviks have historically made a priority of female involvement in the political process.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 23 Comments [5/15/2016 5:09:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: David

Quote# 124434

Bolding is mine.

Abstract (summary): This thesis analyzes examples of current female circumcision discourse within U.S. feminist contexts and western-based anti-circumcision projects operating in Kenya. This analysis reveals that, despite recent critiques from postcolonial scholars and activists, the knowledge produced around female circumcision perpetuates discursive and material violence against Kenyan Maasai communities. I explore how this violence has persisted in neo/colonial eras as part of the white western feminist ‘care of self’ technique of displacing female abjection through the pleasure of whiteness. I trace how these formations of race and gender have become attached to understandings of genitalia through colonial-era race science, Freudian psychoanalysis and some feminist texts from 1949-1970. I suggest that these western feminist constructions of sexual liberation rely on depicting racialized women as primitive and degenerate. Finally, I argue that these racial and gendered constructions now inform concepts of ‘developed’ versus ‘underdeveloped’ bodies and nations in contemporary international development work.

Kaitlin Noss, University of Toronto 20 Comments [2/11/2017 5:27:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 125745

One can only dream of a future where paedophilia has been eradicated, not by killing all men, but by purging society of feminists thus eradicating all paedophilia allegations.

holocaust21, Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 19 Comments [3/26/2017 3:55:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: X Hugo

Quote# 125987

physically, she is small, weak, slender, hairless, with perky tits and round ass, built like a little sex doll for a white man to pound and unload his semen into. even if you're not an ephebophile by nature, you will find yourself beginning to think like one as you grow to appreciate how soft and childlike her supple body is next to your hairy and well muscled form, and how nice and easy it is to dominate her in bed and toss her around like a rag doll.

looking into the cute almond eyes that adorn her silly pancake face, you can read a kind of submissive devotion. the alienness of the oriental features, the minimalism of that nose bridge, the femininity of those hairless and scentless limbs - you feel captivated by this race of women that is so repulsively unlike you, yet so eager to tease and pleasure you, and you become tremendously aroused by this set of circumstances, for you feel like a king.

mentally, she is inexperienced and naive about the world, naive about leading a feminist lifestyle although she may know its tenets. she is also introverted and shy, naturally intelligent yet submissive, eager to please because you are her first white man and that means a lot to her, and overall very self-conscious of her race and its position.

her frame of reference is literally a 5'5" spiky haired asian nerd with 4 inch penis. she will be so grateful that you are a 5'8" white guy with 5 inch penis that she will practically not see any difference between that and porn star proportions, because all she can discern is that you are huge and packing.
she's accustomed to scrawny family members and asian friends with bowl cuts, so if you play in a sports league with friends you will seem like a thrilling alpha sports star. if you're 5'10" she will think you're a muscle man. if you dress reasonably well, she will feel like a village girl invited to be a princess. if you have blonde hair and blue eyes, she will call you ryan gosling in front of her friends as her pussy gushes at the aryan ideal.
over the years she has been trained to differentiate between the asian and white guys, but not so much between different types of white men, so it's unlikely for her to run off with another white man for trivial or whimsical reasons. as a chinky outsider, she will be naive to many of your personal flaws, she will have lower standards, and she will be unable to parse the social inadequacies that a white girl would easily pick up on. in sum, you have more slack with her than with any girl you have had previously.

any time she notices a difference between asian and white races, such comparisons will inevitably run in favor of the white. as the white boyfriend, you will automatically benefit from the broad generalizing racial judgments that result from these frequent outbursts of neurotic self-hatred. your sexy asian girlfriend has a chip on her shoulder and will vent about race a lot. realize that this is mostly to impress you. pat her on the head and remind her that you are the white guy (not the bad guy). it keeps her content, and grateful.

you can get away with doing degrading things to her because although she puts up a front like she's a feminist and sick of white guys with yellow fever, in reality she loves to take abuse because she believes wholeheartedly in white superiority and feels most poignantly the inferiority of her own race. remember that this is a girl who has been obsessed with being owned and bred by a superior race of men since she was a 70 lb. middle school girl who had just talked to a white boy for the first time in her life. she's shared these fantasies with her asian female friends, and even announced them around asian guys and adults, with the corollary that a full asian baby would be runty and undesirable and below what she knows she deserves. this is a girl who knows what she wants, and what she wants is your penis in order to have your seed, your seed in order to have a half-white baby, and that baby for the eugenics of her line and the purification of her womb. she admires you as more than just a man, but as the benefactor of her future children, as the ticket to interracial bliss and her acceptance into a higher, white society. you better believe that, at this point, she has conditioned herself to love the white man, to be caring and nurturing and supportive of the white man, to make him happy and satisfy his needs no matter what.

finally, by dating a white man, she is proudly rejecting her own race, and this is wonderfully good for you. it eliminates or smooths over usual lines of conflict. now you two have something that binds you together, that transcends petty squabbles and usual couples' issues. it frames your relationship in a grander context and gives it a special narrative. the narrative is that she is fleeing her oppressive native culture, hounded by hateful asian men who feel entitled to enslave her, and you are her white knight savior who has dedicated his time to making everything right. this legitimates your feelings of lust when you're pounding her in the ass and she's squealing like a hello kitty toy. this makes you feel bigger and stronger than you normally would when manhandling a petite girl whose utmost desire is to please you. this makes you feel good about yourself, righteous even, and entitles you to make derisive statements about a whole group of people that you have long felt to be beneath your kind - asians. because you know, you know what it means to save a precious asian girl from that sinister race, and you know how it feels to sweep her up in your strong white arms as she mews appreciatively about your bravado and how different you are from every asian guy she's met. now you can indulge in your asian fantasies with this heroic twist and it makes your penis feel so BIG. heck, life's too short to live any other way.

LOL GUTTER SLUT AZN WOMEN, JUST LOL, AutoAdmit 18 Comments [4/4/2017 7:34:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 125735

When artificial wombs are invented men won’t even have to do it, women will rope themselves as their sexual market value plus power that comes alongside it is completely destroyed.

W]hen [women] start to diminish men will most likely find it viable to cross the x-y line in order to flock to cute-boys to settle down with, and marry whom don’t have the hypergamous instinct of biological females.

As soon as [artificial wombs] are invented we don’t have to put up with the bullshit of women anymore, cute-boys are more feminine than western females and always eager to please/available for sex to a partner.

They are more of a woman than any western whore and at the same time if you pursue them now there is no trouble, and also no ridiculous laws on what rape is(Which is everything nowadays) protecting them.

Even if one marries a nice-guy he will only get used for his money, while she will continue to sleep around with the alpha male bad boys. The beta male nice guy will be forced to pour his resources into raising his child, which should be the responsibility of the other man and not him.

Women are biologically hypergamous, will always date and marry up, and even if in a relationship, a woman will immediately leave the man for a higher guy if she thinks she can land him.

Women also sexually desire men who have a violent criminal record(Especially murder/assault/robbery/drugs/gangs being the top most “hot”) and wear tattoos/piercings on them. The jerks and badboys half of which being criminals, sometimes fresh out of prison/jail or bullies in school are straightforward about their sexual intentions; and masculine enough to press for it.

DownWithWomen, We Hunted The mammoth 21 Comments [3/25/2017 11:17:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 126479

A woman has to be exceptionally stunningly beautiful to pull off a tattoo. But that's defeating the whole purpose right? Ugly girls in search of identity are the ones who get tattoos.

But if I'm out getting chicks and I snag one with a tattoo, she is immediately downgraded to sperm urinal. Sure I'll stab them intestines like Mike Meyers but I'd never commit to a chick with tattoos.

As a rule of thumb, each tattoo on a girl symbolizes each 50 dudes she let piss sperm in her womb.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 11 Comments [4/19/2017 12:41:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 123076

[OP of "You all are proof of evil female nature and all of you deserve to get raped by me"]

Your efforts to belittle our suffering and mocking us will not go unpunished. Females being alone and not being able to get chad is not comparable to real inceldom. Making fun of our ideology/philosophy and comparing your chad craving to our incel suffering in an effort to belittle inceldom is truly evil. It is a crime that can not be forgiven. All of you evil whores deserve to get raped and destroyed by me. Inceldom is a serious condition exclusive to men that needs to be resolved as soon as possible. It needs to be taken seriously and not get mocked or belittled. Even the claim that females can be incel belittles inceldom. Females claiming to be incel is an insult to real incels and the suffering they have to endure. Inceldom is serious. It is not a laughing matter. Inceldom kills, killed and will kill again. You, whores, are truly evil and disgusting. If you really claim to be incel then there would be no problem if I raped all of you fatass whores. That is what you disgusting slobs deserve. All of you are evil. Evil needs to be hated and destroyed. All of you deserve getting raped then shot by me. What you people do right now is a crime against inceldom and incels. This subreddit is a travesty and an abomination. I hate each and every single one of you with the very core of my being.

SaintElliot, Reddit - r/FemaleIncels 36 Comments [12/17/2016 3:18:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 125954

Females don't have personalities

I know one femoid organism who has diagnosed autism and had literally no interests outside playing insipid Xanga games. Talks in a monotone, long awkward pauses where her brain seems to be on idle, etc.

She got married 3 years ago and just shat out her first runt (male, so likely a future spergcel).

This makes me fucking furious. Normshits are always saying to improve your personality - what bullshit! A female have the personality of a vegetable and still get laid, get married, have kids, etc.

As a matter of fact, most FHOs have only the most basic pumpkin spice latte of personalities. No deep interests, no passions, no unique take on life, no strong ambitions other than the most generic normie shit (money/house/kids/travel). They can still get a boyfriend at the drop of a hat.

This includes the "nerdy" "gamer girl" "feminist activist" "kinky" "polyamorous" pussy equipped redditwhores who post here. They dont have any original instrinsic personality, they have a bunch of cliques they identify with. No real depth, substance, originality or thought put into it.

Females are garbage.

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 12 Comments [4/2/2017 7:30:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125256

@eivind
You pointed out an intersting poin that actually does not exist: my fault, sorry.
I forgot to point that Saudi Arabia has an huge problem with spinsterhood. So, saudi men have already the chaches to get women.
In my opinion is a law manufactured just against men like me, who decide to live their life following a law that is noth the one of their contries, to make impossible for us to get decent women even if we move there.
In other countries like Pakistan, where men are weakened by western propaganda through satanic sluts like Malala, the feminists managed to pass the very same law of the west, like aoc at 16.
Since in Saudi Arabia it is not possible because local men would rise up, alhamdulillah!!!, they managed at least to ruin the lives of oppressed desperate western men who were getting ready to move.
It's the war on western men.

Anonymous, Eivind Berge's Blog 11 Comments [3/9/2017 3:19:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: dd

Quote# 125948

What would your ideal sex slave be like

• 5' tall with a lolita build

• Intact hymen

• Cute face

• Watches anime and plays vidya while sitting on my lap (erection)

• Never had, or will have contact with men other than me

• Willing to do FFM threesomes with me, and will actively find chicks for us to fuck

• Enthusiastically submits to any sexual demands I make

• Squirts female ejaculate like a firehose

• Extremely devoted, loyal and self sacrificing and does all the domestic slave chores like cooking and cleaning

• Raises all our children with a minimum of input from me and never gets fat no matter how many times impregnated

• Cute innie pussy that smells/tastes of berries and cream, that has never been devastated by Chad or Tyrone

• Willing to raise our female descendants to be free sex faeries who will rescue the men of r/incels from their subhumanity

Why do females like this not exist IRL? Just lol at whoever devised this nightmarish universe.

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 21 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125420

How can you not hate women?

Hate.

I hate them.

Their stupid fucking smiles. Women smile more because they live life on easy mode. They have no reason to be unhappy.

All they have to do is walk into a room and all the attention is on them. People will cater to their every whim just because they were born with a vagina.

Meanwhile, I'm bullied all throughout school. I'm treated like scum. Insulted by everyone. The only times people have called me attractive were when they were saying it sarcastically. That hurts more than just being called ugly.

They contribute nothing to conversation. They think they can say any useless thing, and the sad reality is they can, because idiot men will eat it up. "Oh my god, you're right. The sky is blue! I've never looked at it like that before."

They don't have to try. They don't have to do anything. And people will love them.

You can call me vocel, but if you live 25+ years without getting attention from women, and you're still being nice to them, then you're absolutely pathetic. These creatures want nothing to do with you, and yet you're still nice and all smiles. Do you have any self worth at all?

There are times when I'm nice to women. At restaurants, for example. Always gotta be nice to those who prepare your food.

But seriously, there are legitimate exceptions to the women I hate. Fat chicks are not one of them. The're just like the rest, if not worse due to overcompensation. However, disfigured women (growths on the face, for example) aren't like the rest. Generally, anyway. It's mostly a case by case basis when it comes to disfigurements. I will also not be mean to women with serious medical issues. I'm not going to be mean to cancer patients. I'm not a monster.

It's ironic though. If I ever got cancer, I'm sure they'd still be mean to me.

andiswearrrr, /r/incels 16 Comments [3/15/2017 12:35:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 122850

The male sexual revolution

The sexual revolution should have favoured men. After all, casual sex was now possible without the fear of getting the girl pregnant or having to marry her. Yet there was one thing screwed men over: Women don’t want casual sex as much as men want. Thus, the price of pussy remained as high as before while the price of cock went down to an all time low. Because of this we need a male sexual revolution break the female privileg.

To fix this there are two possibilities: Lower the price of pussy or increase the price of cock. I already talked about how we need to get rid of some fetishes in order to stop making women think they are entitled to Chad without bringing anything g to the table. How we have to talk about lowering the price of pussy.

The best way for this are sexbots. Why swipe through 30 bots on Tinder and then jump through some hoops when you can have an artificial pussy right at home? The effort/reward balance is way better for sexbots then for a hookup.

Of course prostitution is also a way but this has some serious downsides. Not only is it dangerous in terms of getting STD or being robbed, but it is also expensive. It is a band-aid for as long as it takes to get actual working sexbots.

EconomicsofSex, /r/incel 40 Comments [12/4/2016 7:17:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125589

A former guard at an Australian youth detention centre has admitted filming himself asking teenage inmates for oral sex.

Conan Zamolo's testimony came during a royal commission inquiry into youth detention in the Northern Territory.

The commission was launched last year after photos showing inmates being strip-searched and placed in a spit hood drew widespread condemnation.

Mr Zamolo said his requests for oral sex were "a joke".

"I was actually just going to say goodnight to them because I was leaving shift," Mr Zamolo said on Monday.

"I knew they'd take it as a joke, or I just assumed they would take it as a joke."

Mr Zamolo also admitted to urging another inmate to eat faeces, and to filming a boy urinating.

"At the time I didn't think it was inappropriate, but now I see how inappropriate it is," he said.

He claimed he had a good relationship with the detainees.

The incidents happened at the Don Dale Youth Detention Centre, where Mr Zamolo worked from 2012 to 2014.

The Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory follows widespread condemnation of the treatment of detainees at Don Dale in 2014 and 2015.

In 2015, Amnesty International described the regime at the centre as "institutionalised brutality", with teenagers being held in solitary confinement with no access to light or water for long periods.

Conan Zamolo, BBC News 8 Comments [3/21/2017 2:28:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 125783

"Why do you treat women like they're a different species?"

• They rarely upfront

• They hate direct communication/ propositions from sub 8 men.

• They don't have reasonable standards (going for their looks-match).

• They have far more turn offs than turn ons. If you miraculously hit a turn on staying on it is like riding a unicycle on a trapeze wire. You can easily fall off into the turn offs while men have far more turn ons and more forgiving of hitting a turn off.

• Their dating advice is rarely applicable to who they actually fucked.

• They have an irrational sexual disgust for sub 8 good guys but give their L(egs). O(pen). V(ery). E(asily) for Chad/badboys.

• They have sex on demand while the majority of men do not. Even hideous women complain that they only get sexual offers. When have you met even an average complain about the same problem?

If women were more sensible in their partner choices then current dating and relationships wouldn't be as fucked as they are and inceldom would be near non-existent.

dontcryimalreadydead, /r/incels 18 Comments [3/28/2017 4:59:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126486

Normies always look out for a fake purpose in everything they do.

Posting a selfie of your ugly face that never actually cared one bit for the consequences of the patriarchy as an unjust social system that enforces gender roles and is oppressive to both men and women and then labeling it as "this is what feminism looks like" while your heightist bigoted ass discriminate against short men , just normie things.

Bullying people and Incels telling them to drink bleach and justifying yourself by saying you saved a life ? just normie things , OH and don't forget to tell them it's their personality that doesnt get them laid while you fuck girls left and right and say that there is only two genders.

sexting girls on r/gonewild while you have a girlfriend and justifying your act buy saying you are helping those girls have faith in themselves and destroy their insecurities ? just normie things.

Post your hairy roastie beef between your legs on r/gonewild and justifying it by saying your husband doesn't make you feel pretty enough and it makes you depressed ? just normie things.

browse r/incels saying you want to help and ghost all incels you talk to the moment brad text you or the moment you have to step out from your confort zone to help a suicidal incel ? just normie things.

Normies are evil, don't ever ever trust them.If Normies were nice all normies would be SJW's or feminists.

foreignincel, /r/incels 8 Comments [4/19/2017 12:42:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126262

The Ballad Of Stacy and Chad

Stacy and Chad
Chad and Stace
Stacy's a "sexually free" woman
So she gets turned on by Chad spitting in her face

She rims his ass while stroking his cock
Chad loves domination and he's hard as a rock
Stacy embraces her "independence" and likes being a "sub"
She learned this lifestyle from reading "Fifty Shades of Grey" while giving her pussy a rub

Vanilla sex is for losers and ugly girls anyways
BDSM games are the only ones that Chad plays
She gets excited, Chad is going to cum
She screams "Master, please don't use lube shove it raw in my bum!"

wokecel, /r/incels 23 Comments [4/12/2017 1:18:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126260

A good female psychologist should let an incel fuck her

While discussing his psychological problems of course.

thegambler953, /r/incels 18 Comments [4/12/2017 1:18:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125728

Having a waifu is just another form of female worship

Cut that shit out.

Stop worshipping fictional female characters, it's pathetic and THEY'RE WOMEN FOR FUCKS SAKE.

Hell I'd say that simply liking a female character is just another form of female worship.

Females need to be violently shoved off the pedestal, not put on an even higher one.

All females deserve our utter hatred. Including ones that aren't real.

IFA_MTBL, /r/incels 10 Comments [3/25/2017 11:16:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125729

I dream of living in an incel only society.

A world where all normies, women, and Chads are extinct and we live in a society of incels. A society of low value men rid of life's greatest reminders of our suffering.

Maybe one day, when artificial wombs become a thing and we can be rid of females, we can take a step towards a society like that.

IFA_MTBL, /r/incels 15 Comments [3/25/2017 11:59:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125645

Most Americans have been led to despise foreign cultures where women are not allowed to walk around immodestly clothed, nor is feminist rebellion tolerated, nor can women run their big mouths in men's matters. The truth is that the Muslim culture comes a lot closer to being right than American culture. I'm not saying that I approve of everything done in Muslim culture, but they are 100% correct to require women to dress appropriately in public, to cover themselves and to remain silent in men's matters. Americans view other cultures which require women to dress properly and wear head-coverings as being oppressive and cruel cultures. When it comes to the way women dress, behave and talk, we have the immoral disease in America, not the Muslims.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [3/22/2017 12:57:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 125282

A Canadian federal judge who asked a woman in a rape trial why she couldn't keep her knees together resigned Thursday after a disciplinary council recommended he be removed from the bench.
...
Camp argued that "unconscious bias" was to blame for the offending comments. In addition to asking the 19-year-old why she didn't keep her knees together to fend off her alleged attacker, he also asked her why she didn't "skew her pelvis" to avoid penetration.
...
Camp made the comments as a provincial court judge in a 2014 trial. He became a federal judge in 2015.
He also remarked that, "Some sex and pain sometimes go together ... that's not necessarily a bad thing."
Camp acquitted the accused man and offered him some advice:
"I want you to tell your friends, your male friends, that they have to be far more gentle with women. They have to be far more patient. And they have to be very careful. To protect themselves, they have to be very careful."


Robin Camp, CNN.com 44 Comments [3/10/2017 12:30:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 125532

Men cannot be raped but we do have our own equivalent, of being cuckolded and tricked into raising somebody who isn’t our own genes which is worse than any of that including prison rape.

Also as for how beta males’ genes from its because patriarchy protected us from the will of hypergamous alpha-hunting women by suppressing their interests, and putting mens’ first. Without patriarchy betas wouldn’t be here.

Women produce nothing of value in this world, they exploit us men for it and we have nothing to lose but our chains in this society against the gynocentric collective matriarchy, when MGTOW-led unions(Not Marxist, Feminist degenerate ones) start forming one day we are going to have all men strike and stop working. And bring down civilization or society as a whole for revenge of your exploitation of us. Women want men to do all the work anyway and don’t do anything so it will be quite easy.


MGTOWRevolutionary, We Hunted The Mammoth 21 Comments [3/18/2017 10:52:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 125968

If your so called "friends" have girlfriends but refuse to let you have sex with her, then find new friends.

SUPHAMSULU, /r/incels 13 Comments [4/3/2017 12:05:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125895

Ain't gonna be no morning after pill in the kingdom. You black, Hispanic, and native woman are going to bare children and your going love it. And your going to be sharing your man rather you like it or not

Asar'el Ben Israel, Facebook 10 Comments [4/1/2017 8:43:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 125634

Our language needs honorifics similar to the japanese

Just like the japanese do: Chan, sama, san, kami, kun, senpai, sensei, dono

Except ours needs to be more reflective our our fucked society:

Kuk - Clueless normie whose female has fucked countless guys.

cel - Average incel

roas - typical roastie

norm - typical normie in denial of reality

Dahc(pronounced daaaK) - typical chad

Ghad - A godly chad, the top 1% of males.

sati - A form of normie who reaches chad like status by compensating for his lack of genetics through status or wealth. Yet he will never be truly loved like a chad, he merely lives like one.

Examples: "Ah Elliot sati, your business is quite remarkable." -Eric. "Yes Eric sati, its too bad about James kuk and Ellis kuk who don't know we're fucking their girls." -Elliot. "What are you fags talking about?" -Anders. "Nothing Anders Ghad! Please excuse us." -Eric

livinginhell101, /r/incels 23 Comments [3/22/2017 9:46:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 123289

[Excerpt from his manifesto "THE STORY OF YOUR INCEL – AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH"]

NECESSARY PRECURSORS

1) All civilized societies were patriarchies.

2) Women are agnostic about male behavior. This means they’re not naturally attracted to any type of man but that their preferences change depending on which kind of men is the most successful with women.

3) In connection to nr.2, women’s preference for a type of male changes simply based on a degree of success a type has with most women.

4) Seduction is worthless, even harmful for most species, as it does not promote any valuable traits that make the species better. It is a form of deceit males make do spread their genes and it creates worthless offspring. This is explained by a phenomenon called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway

5) I believe voting is a privilege that should only be given to intelligent men and shouldn’t be given to women.

caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 36 Comments [12/28/2016 2:07:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126085

I highly recommend that you read William Guy Carr's numerous books. Satanists teach that Satan had sex with Eve in the Garden of Eden. Satanist's entire belief system is rooted in human debasing sex-perversion. Thus, Satanism and sex are inseparable. With this disturbing truth in mind from Cmdr. Carr, it will become obvious to you just how evil and dangerous the sensual, promiscuous and sexualizing music videos of Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus, Carrie Underwood, and hundreds of other Satanic servants are!

Taylor Swift's Music & Videos Degrade Girls Into Sex Objects, Promoting Satanism

As an example of a very bad role model, and an evil whore, entertainer Taylor Swift (whose net worth is now $200,000,000) greatly harms young people with her music and videos. Taylor Swift is a spoiled brat, a disgrace to America, and another puppet of the Illuminati. Swift's music videos SEXUALIZE young teenage girls, teaching them that everything is all about sex, sex, sex.

Case in point is her despicable 2011 video “Better Than Revenge.” I cannot link to the video in good conscience, because it is so sexually promiscuous. The video features four beautiful teenage girls, all wearing tight mini-skirts, skin-tight pants, and they are shaking their rear-ends to seduce the viewer. One girl is filmed falling into a bed. At the end of the video, all four girls are in a bed. The girls are all wearing tight bras, literally shaking their breasts for the camera. From beginning to end Taylor Swift's video is SEXUALIZATION!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 8 Comments [4/7/2017 7:23:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 125367

Reminder that your value as a person is made up purely of your face and body

Your entire human value is completely dependant on how attractive you are, how tall you are, how big your torso is, and other indicators of your GENETICS

Traits like kindness, loyalty, intelligence, these are completely meaningless and irrelevent in society


cuckcel, /r/incels 31 Comments [3/13/2017 2:54:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126133

boys? you mean sex toys that are rude and don't even vibrate? no thank u

anxius, Tumblr 18 Comments [4/8/2017 1:59:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 126579

If your dog is barking at the back door and your wife is yelling at the front door, who do you let in first? The dog, of course. He'll shut up once you let him in.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 14 Comments [4/22/2017 12:26:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 125838

(Warning: More Vogon Incel Poetry!)

Chad's girlfriend is hot

You lie down and rot

Chad takes her to bed

You punch yourself in the head

Chad fills her with hot jism

You struggle with autism

Chad fucks her ass

You are a 5' subhuman manlet whose existence holds neither hope nor meaning, you will never know love and everyone around you is pretty much waiting for you to die or go away

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 22 Comments [3/30/2017 4:12:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126664

Conservative commentator Michael Reagan, the son of former president Ronald Reagan, defended Bill O’Reilly this morning over claims that the recently fired Fox News host sexually harassed women.

Reagan, a contributor to the conservative outlet Newsmax, shared posts on Facebook and Twitter insisting that if women wear “low cut dresses,” then men should consider suing “for sexual arousal”:

"If women are going to wear low cut dresses that show cleavage don’t be harassed when we men look.Or shld we sue for sexual arousal?"
— Michael Reagan (@ReaganWorld) April 21, 2017

He also responded to the allegation that O’Reilly called a black coworker “hot chocolate” and grunted while passing her desk by saying that it was a compliment:

"Hot Choclare used to be a compliment on your looks today it is called sexual harassment..@oreillyfactor"
— Michael Reagan (@ReaganWorld) April 21, 2017

Michael Reagan, Right Wing Watch 13 Comments [4/25/2017 11:51:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 126195

More proof that women cannot be incel: necrophilia

Now I don't condone necrophilia as it's disgusting, but the fact that it exists is further proof that women cannot be incel. We are literally less desirable than the corpses of women.

ASS_F, /r/incels 14 Comments [4/10/2017 2:03:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126137

Putting one's willy in underage girls is wonderful, but let's be clear about what MRA is: our focus should be on fighting back against the state for hurting us in unfair and oppressive ways. Where you want to put your willy is really a personal rather than political matter; it just happens that one of the leading causes of injustice against men is perpetrated via prohibitions on underage sex, along with a corrupted definition of rape and so on, and that is why we talk about sex with minors so much

Eivind Berge, EIVIND BERGE'S BLOG 19 Comments [4/8/2017 2:00:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 125366

In other words, if a woman just doesn't look your way while touching herself whether that be her hair or cleavage (yes, I've seen it happen out in the blue), then you are not desirable. I am not desirable, I belong here.

Women are evil as fuck..

(They're evil because they're not into you??)

They're evil because women shit on me throughout my life and continue to shit on me or disregard me, but that's okay. This just means I don't have to give a damn about them and their problems, their rights, etc. If anything, they deserve to get their rights taken away, fucking privileged whores.

GorePunkSpidey, /r/incels 20 Comments [3/13/2017 2:54:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125355

Men seriously suck. I fkn hate 'em... There I've come right out and finally said it. I fucking hate men with a level of hate I never knew I had in me. They terrorize women across the planet and have throughout all of history and the "good ones" stand by and watch it happen and do NOTHING... I want a new world without men. Seriously, a new planet...I just read a story about a disgusting man with half a head try to rape a woman then burn down her house, (I guess the half head part of him is what made him fail at the rape, but it almost happened)....the picture of him just made me want to throw up, even without the majority of his brain, he still has the need to kill, maim, rape etc...it's what they do, it's what they are...they're animals...they are fkng mutants, I'm so convinced...I want a male free planet. NOW. Nuclear war wouldn't even be a threat if it weren't for men. The world and all life on earth will probably end because men need to assert their dominance over all living things and everyone in the world. It's the ultimate dick wag! At least one guy "gets it" about how fucked men are: George Carlin with his "Male Disease" act....but that's about it. I seriously hate men.

Just Passing Through , Feminist Current 28 Comments [3/13/2017 8:00:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By:

Quote# 126209

A girl recently told me that she hopes her female dog would breed. Otherwise, the dog may have a false pregnancy where she pretends she is pregnant and shows increasingly unstable behavior. This was the first time I learned about the scientific condition in dogs called pseudopregnancy. I was immediately struck by how similar it is to the behavior of adult human women who don’t have babies, especially ones who live in the affluent West. After studying this condition extensively, I speculate that women who don’t fulfill their biological program of having children exhibit the disturbing signs of false pregnancy by becoming insane.

The symptoms of false pregnancy stem from hormonal changes. The female dog, which I will refer to as the “bitch” from this point on, experiences enlarged mammary glands and may secrete milk. Her abdominum swells, she gains weight, the vagina discharges a fluid, and there may be nausea and vomiting. The bitch may even exhibit cravings for certain foods alongside increased appetite.

Emotional changes are soon to follow. The bitch shows overt emotional attachment and even defensiveness for abstract objects like toys or clothing. Her nesting instinct causes her to hoard random objects like tennis balls, and she will often appear confused or disoriented. Other symptoms include aggression, depression, restlessness, and anxiety.

When I read the symptoms of canine false pregnancy, I realized that the majority of childless women over the age of 25 exhibit the exact same symptoms. The most obvious symptom that we can visually observe is weight gain. It is hard, if not impossible, to find a female past her fertile prime that is of normal weight. Next, the human female shows emotional attachment to objects that are outside of her personal domain of home and family, specifically minorities and Islamic migrants. A childless woman collects animals and third world migrants like a bitch collects tennis balls, as if she is their mother trying to protect them from danger, but of course poor brown people are not her children, and may view her as stupid.

...

The barren human female also displays aggression against those who threaten her “children.” If you try to take away a tennis ball of a bitch who has false pregnancy, she will attack you. The same happens if you try to “take away” the brown migrants that a human female has coveted. She will be vicious in calling you racist, fascist, literally Hitler, and whatever bad man of history that she happens to remember from her history classes in high school.

...

Understand that aggression is the most dominant trait of the false pregnancy, because the bitch actually believes that someone is trying to kill her “offspring.” In human females, you see displays so full of anger and violence that even include calls for an uprising that overthrows or kills a democratically elected president. The nurturing instinct, which is useful in women who have children, goes horribly wrong in women who fail to have children.

...

If a woman doesn’t hoard brown migrants, she will procure a cat or dog and pretend that the animal is a human child. It is now common to see women dress up their pets as if they’re actual humans and talk to them using a baby voice. The motherly instinct becomes hijacked by these furry animals.

...

The other symptoms of false pregnancy, such as depression, restlessness, and anxiety, seem to perfectly describe childless Western females, who are so mentally ill that at least 25% of them need to be medicated with pharmaceutical drugs. The combination of their sterility and the extreme enabling of their behavior in Western culture has created a perfect storm that is leading to societal mass hysteria.

It turns out that false pregnancy is common in the mammalian world, occurring not only in dogs but also cats, mice, swine, and yes, humans. In human cases, the woman has to think she is falsely pregnant to be diagnosed with the disorder, but I believe that a woman experiences the same symptoms without actually thinking she is pregnant. When reading the scientific literature on female dogs, I had to remind myself that it wasn’t about human females—that’s how similar the clinical presentation of the symptoms are.

If you know a woman who is showing signs of false pregnancy, I recommend you do an intervention to remind her that she is not pregnant, brown migrants are not her children, and Donald Trump is not a threat to her pug. Unfortunately, there is no cure unless she actually becomes pregnant, but that would require her to emotionally bond with another human being and sacrifice for its needs in a way that goes beyond superficial virtue signalling. That may be asking for the impossible, but unless women start having babies, I expect them to continue descending into greater levels of madness.

Roosh, Roosh V 11 Comments [4/11/2017 9:09:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 124901

[A gunman who shot dead eight people in an upmarket beauty salon in California is said to have gone on the rampage after losing a custody battle over his son. Scott Dekraai, who is the former husband of one of the stylists, is said to have shot a total of nine hairdressers and customers at Salon Meritage, a beauty salon just blocks from the Pacific Ocean in the upscale seaside resort of Seal Beach.

His ex-wife, Michelle, is also reportedly among those who were killed. The 42-year-old, who used to work in the military, had allegedly threatened violence after losing a court case against Michelle - who was using the name Huff - over the custody of their seven-year-old son, Dominic.]

The problem is twofold. First, the family court system is totally unjust. Second, there is simply no other recourse for the man who has been forcibly robbed of his children by the unholy alliance of ex-wife and family court. I have zero sympathy for any woman who would utilize the force of the law to deprive a man of his children, no matter how unhappy the marriage. In fact, one can quite reasonably argue that it is in the interest of women to demand a more equitable family court system; this should become more apparent when "winning" a child custody case amounts to a potential death lottery.

The ironic thing is that society tends to applaud a man who do anything and pay any price to get back his child. There are movies entirely based on this premise. So, why should it surprise anyone that increasing numbers of men are willing to resort to breaking the very law that took their children away from them? Throughout the West, the Muslims have shown the way: threaten sufficient violence in a credible manner and the law will be modified according to your will.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 21 Comments [2/26/2017 6:55:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: David

Quote# 119054

Harsh reality: Female prophetesses have done far more harm to women in the church than good. If you are looking for someone to blame for all of the lasciviousness, lewdness, sexual deviancy, broken homes, standoffish wives, and lonely-burning-in-lust single women (who put their worldly desires before their children); take a look at the female leadership in the church.

Far too many women will not learn that Satan has put the stumblingblock of an out of order 'woman of God' right in their midst to usher them straight to hell.

This is why you see gluttonous women, drunk women, shameless women, violent women running amok in the church right now.

Get back to 'biblical standards.' But alas you have to actually read the Bible...something far too many church women don't make time to do. There you will see that female leadership in the church is out of order, and not of God.

Eden Decoded, Facebook 11 Comments [5/19/2016 2:33:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 30234

There are many reasons why a woman president would ruin America:

REASON #1

God has commanded that women shall NOT lead nations. This commandment of God is found in the Holy Scriptures, the Bible, the Word of God.

REASON #2

God has commanded that women shall NOT lead men. In leading nations, women would be leading men. Therefore, women cannot lead nations. The commandment of God that women shall NOT lead men is found in the Holy Scriptures, the Bible, the Word of God.

REASON #3

History teaches us that EVERY great nation experienced a decline in power and reputation once a woman was given the leadership of each of these nations.

REASON #4

Women are more likely to make wrong decisions than men. This truth is stated in the Bible and proven by history.

REASON #5

Women generally do NOT have the mental and physical stamina required by the position of the President of the United States of America.

REASON #6

Currently, all those women interested in becoming president are women of only average character and intelligence.

REASON #7

Women do not have the political pull of men, which is required to be effective in the position of the President of the United States.

REASON #8

Women do not have the political will of men. They are more likely to waver in their views and decisions than men.

REASON #9

A woman would not have the support of the American people. The latest poll reveals that 90% of men and 95% OF WOMEN are against having a woman as president.

REASON #10

A woman would be incapacitated more than 3% of the time because of natural, physiological events. What if this happened during a time of national crisis such as the “9/11 Attack”?

REASON #11

Women generally score a minimum of 20 points lower on IQ tests than men. We need the smartest person in the presidency.

Dr. Michael J. Bisconti, LF Nexus 89 Comments [10/20/2007 12:49:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: jsonitsac

Quote# 124362

A look inside stacie's life

Stacy wakes up and she checks normiegram, normiebook and her dating sites. She got 400 likes on her photo on Instagram, Chad commented "thick" the beta orbiter commented "Gorgeous" and her friend Katie pm'd her asking if she hooked up with Chad. She replies "yes he was so good" Stacy and Katie blew 2 chads together the night before, they are good friends. She checks her dating site and sees 2 guys who she fucked in her inbox, she rolls her eyes and blocks them. They were attractive, but they were bad in bed. She has 70 new messages and only 3 of them are chads. One says "dtf" the other says "you trying to hangout?" And the last one says "want to grab something to eat" Stacy thinks to herself hmm.. maybe I can fuck all of them today. She puts on some dry shampoo, makeup and she is ready to meet Chad #1 now. She goes over to his house, Chad says she looks nothing like her picture but that's ok. Stacy laughs hehe you're so funny, Chad makes some bullshit small talk and she just laughs and eye fucks him. Chad fucks her in the kitchen and she is off to meet Chad #2. When Chad 2 opens the door she says "omg your so tall hehe" Chad says she is just short and he greets her. After drinking some of chads cheap ass champagne, they get 2 minutes into Netflix and chill and she is trying to suck his dick. While she sucks his dick the door opens, Chad?!?! It's not what it looks like! Says Chad. Stacy runs out of the apartment, the adrenaline feels good. The next day chads girlfriend forgave him because Chad said he will make it up to her; Chad said he will try out bsdm with her. Stacy is off to meet Chad #3. Chad 3 takes her to red lobster, Chad sees her looking at the most expensive meal on the menu and he is thinking "this slut better not fucking order that" he then suggests something cheaper and he says it's phenomenal. She smiles and says okay. Chad is feeling a little spontaneous today, so they go fuck In an empty parking lot. Stacy goes home and writes on Twitter "it was such a long day" and "I'm lonely anyone want to cuddle?" Her ex comes over and they fight and then they fuck. After that they cuddle, watch some normie tv shows and smoke some bowls.

iamhopeless256, /r/incels 20 Comments [2/9/2017 2:12:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125730

DAE hate mothers of betas?

All of their life most of them have been chasing for Chad cock and when they get married, settle and pop out a kid they suddenly have an urge to make their child the same beta they've been rejecting when they were young. They teach them that having a cute personality is the most important thing and that they should be obedient and respectful no matter what. It's like softcore cucking of your own child. Why would you do that?

You know that you rejected those type of guys in high school/college so why are you teaching your own child to be like that? You are teaching him how to pick up a 30+ year old woman instead of a young teen that thinks such guys are revolting. He isn't trying to score with you, a woman past her prime that got tired of her wild early years.

It makes me think that if women taught their adolescents to be an alpha there'd be less betas, hence less guys to settle for in the next generation when a cock carousel slut becomes unwanted by the top percentage of men after they are pumped and dumped. In conclusion, cucking your own seed is less important than perpetuating a mass supply for whores in early 30s. Disgusting.

LexaBinsr, /r/incels 6 Comments [3/25/2017 11:59:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126500

(Just out of curiosity, why do you feel the need to differentiate between lesbians and gold star lesbians? Why does it make you so angry that women who have had sex with men have the same right as a "gold star" like you to identify as a lesbian? Is it a superiority thing? Do you think you're better than those women? I really want to know why you put so much energy into something as trivial as this. )

First of all, it is not a trivial thing. Maybe to you non gold stars but to most gold star lesbians it is not trivial. Gold Star lesbian means a lesbian who has never willingly slept with a man or boy. Where in the definition does it say that gold star lesbians think they are superior to other lesbians? Rape victims can be gold stars lesbians because it implies consensual sex not rape. The term gold star used to be a slur. “Lesbians” who had or are sleeping with men made fun of and insulted lesbians who have never and will never sleep with men willingly by saying something like this, “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” So these lesbians eventually got sick of it and decided to reclaim the word for themselves thus the gold star lesbian. The “lesbians” and their supporters who made fun of them and future supporters who will hate the term and/or definition of the term or/and the actual gold star lesbians are forever pissed of and will do anything to silence us and make us look bad. I think it was never about the term, it was and is about the definition of the term because they are other offensive terms such as pillow princess and dyke and slut that no one is making a fuss over and even if they do people ignore it. I think these people who are antigold stars just can’t stand and comprehend how a woman has not and will not willingly have sex with men and they are pissed of because they and everyone expect every woman to sleep with a man at least once in her lifetime. I view antigold stars to be mysoginistic and homophobic. I care because it puts a really bad reputation on real lesbians. Gold star lesbians have face the same compulsory heterosexuality just like the “lesbians” who have slept with men. There is only one type of lesbian and it is a biological woman who is sexually, emotionally, romantically, and physically attracted to ONLY other biological women. By that definition lesbians don’t willingly have sex with men. Also, they are many ways to avoid having sex with men when you are faced with expectations to sleep with them unless you live in a country like Afghanistan where who are basically raped and force to do things. The only excuse that I hear of why a “lesbian” slept with a man willingly is because compulsorary heterosexuality but there excuse is not valid because gold star lesbians face the same challenges as they do. Actually they have more of a challenge and are at more of a risk because they have never and will never sleep with men willingly and society expects women to have sex with men. Gold Star lesbians are not “lucky” they are just following their lesbianism. These “lesbians” who have slept and/or are sleeping with men make lesbians a huge joke to the mayority, the straight people. Those “lesbians” reinforce the stereotype that lesbians can have sex with men willingly, it is just a phase, they will end up with men, they can be “turn”, etc. The word lesbian has been changed (not by the dictionary but by what people connote it to) to mean a woman who had sex with men but now has sex with women. I don’t even like to call myself lesbian because people especially the LGBTQ will assume that I have slept with men which is not true. So I call myself gold star lesbian and this clearly states that I have never and will never sleep with men. The term lesbian has been changed to be ambiguous meaning that it can mean anything even the bisexuals claim the word lesbians. The point is to distinguish the “lesbians” who had and/or have sex with men from the lesbians who has never and will never willingly sleep with a man. After all, who do you think a person who wants to learn about lesbians will take more seriously, a “lesbian” who has slept or/and is sleeping with men or a lesbian who has never and will never sleep with men? I care because you antigold star lesbians are silencing us and expect us to be viewed as manfuckers like every other “lesbian”. It is just a term and because antigold stars are making a huge fuss over it I assume you all are homophobic. Plus, why do the “lesbians” who have had sex with men get a voice while lesbians who never slept with men need to shut the fuck up by the antigold star lesbians? It is antigold stars who make a huge fuss about the term and put bullshit lies in our mouths such as we don’t let rape victims be gold stars (most gold stars would agree that they can be gold stars). We gold stars are just defending ourselves from your homophobic bullshit.

(Hi, so there are many issues with your argument:

1) I think it’s funny how you assumed that I am a “non gold star” lesbian just because I have a problem with your perspective. To use your language, I am in fact a “platinum gold star” lesbian. My current girlfriend was my first kiss :)

2) The term “gold star” lesbian is not a slur. The response “oh, so you have never slept with a man? So now what do you want? A gold star!?” probably came after your insufferable and needless bragging about never having been with a “biological male”, which by the way, is transphobic. I’m not surprised that you’re a terf. A sarcastic comeback is not the same as a slur. The term “dyke” is used when I’m being threatened from across the street by a group of men for holding my girlfriend’s hand. No one cares if I’m a gold star or not.

3) You assume IMMENSE amounts of privilege when talking about being a gold star lesbian. I come from a country where there was absolutely NO LGBT representation. On top of that, my family was very religious and conservative. Heterosexual sex wasn’t even discussed or represented without religious warnings and limitations, i.e. only when you’re married, etc. I have had feelings for women for as long as I could remember, but due to my young inability to comprehend what I was feeling, I continued to identify as straight. After all, I had no point of reference, so how could I identify as something I didn’t even know was an option? You don’t have to be in Afghanistan being murdered or raped to deal with compulsory heterosexuality. If I had remained in my country, I would have probably ended up in a casually arranged marriage courtesy of my parents, distant relatives, and family friends. I know for a fact that I would also have just accepted and went along with the marriage, as I would have wanted to please my family. It would have probably been a close childhood friend of mine and we could just continue to be best friends after the marriage, just with occasional sex thrown in. Would I have been enthusiastic about the sex? Maybe not, but since I would have had no point of reference, chances are that I would have just went along with it to please my husband. No big deal, right? Except that in this scenario, I’m gay and I just don’t know it.

P.S. this situation isn’t completely hypothetical, I know a few of my parents’ friends that had me lined up as an option for their sons.

What I’m trying to show you is that there is nuance to being a lesbian. Nothing is just black and white. A lesbian is a woman (cis or trans) that is attracted solely to women. Therefore, I am a lesbian, just as much as my girlfriend, @tinylesbian, who has been involved with men for means of safety and survival.

4) The differentiation of platinum/gold star lesbians vs lesbians who have been involved with men in the past creates a hierarchy and is not helpful nor conducive to a supportive lesbian community. Bragging about never having been with a “biological male” (still transphobic) should not be a point of pride as it insinuates that you are somehow more of a lesbian than women who have and honestly, it’s just unnecessary information. We don’t care. No one does.)


There are gold stars and platinum lesbians who disagree with the label and I know that but most of them that complain about the label are the ones who sleep or have slept with men. Personally, I don’t like the term because it implies something better but no one including the haters have tried to come up with a new neutral term. Transexuals can’t be lesbians because I follow science. I suppose I am a TERF but I don’t call myself that because I find it offensive. The term may not have been a slur but it obviously was used to offend the gold star lesbians. I do agree that Afghanistan is not the only place that you can get raped and murdered for being LGBTQ. Unfortunately, even the U.S. has problems with murder and rape. However, as a society you can get help if you are raped and the rapist will get punished if he or she is reported but unfortunately some countries don’t have that. I in fact am a platinum lesbian. Despite that I had tried to be straight and tried to like boys in my teenaged years but it didn’t work and never got a boyfriend or any fuckboys coming after me (probably because of my social issues). Plus, I just couldn’t bring myself to have sex with males because to me it felt like I was going to sleep with an animal. It just wasn’t for me and my extincts just said no. I also tried commiting suicide a couple of times. But just because I am a platinum lesbian doesnt means that I had an easy life and that I and other gold star and platinum lesbians should be ignored and silenced. Most of us gold star and platinum lesbians have not had an easy life and we didn’t go have sex with men to make it easier and plus it is not in our nature. I totally disagree that lesbianism is nuanced. If lesbianism is nuanced, what about straight people are they nuanced and not black and white? The lesbian community is a huge joke (at least the ones I have been to) and it is not because of gold star and platinum lesbians. It is because of “lesbians” and bisexuals who can’t shut the hell up about men whether how it was good or bad having sex with them, how to unlearn liking men, divorces, marriages, children with men, etc. I expected a community of lesbians who talked only about women and not a thing about men (relating to sexual or romantic). Plus, the hate and bullying towards and silencing of lesbians who have never slept with men by the antigold stars and antiplatinums is unbelievable. Sometimes they even ban you from the place if you have never slept with men. I don’t involve myself in the lesbian community or LGBTQ community anymore and only seek other gold star or platinum lesbians to date. You and only people with your mentality may not care about the term but why the hell do you and others think you have the right to tell us what we can and cannot call ourselves and judge us when they are many bisexuals who mislabel themselves as lesbians and make a joke out of us? One of the reasons why we are loud and vocal is because people like you want to silence us and most people don’t want to be silenced. Also, we want to be role models to young lesbians to show them that they don’t have to sleep with a men to make sure they are lesbians or to be proper lesbians. I will respect your opinions despite that I disagree with them and I hope you respect mine despite you disagreeing with me. And then we call it quits.

platinumgoldstarlesbians, Tumblr 16 Comments [4/20/2017 1:40:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 126073

The ages of women and their characteristics and experiences at these ages are as follows.

Age 18

According to Heartiste, "This is the age — from teenager to mid-20s — when a woman is in her nubile prime. Physically and emotionally she is at her horniest, her most feminine, and, not coincidentally, her most discriminating. She’s on the prowl for an alpha male, and specifically for a charming jerkboy whose devil-may-care attitude speaks so forcefully to her deep desire to submit to a top tier man with limitless lover options."

He also notes, "Hard to believe, but it is often easier to bed a very young woman than an older woman, if you are an older man. This is because 20-40% of women are specifically attracted to older men. It is hard-wired in them, and this hard-wiring can be reinforced by poor family upbringing resulting from divorce of parents or absentee fathers. Single moms are the greatest source of future generations of slutty daughters the world has ever known. . . . You can bang an 18-21 year old surprisingly quickly because they have little ASD (anti-slut defense). This is because they do not have the long history of sluttiness common to older women which needs to be rationalized away by posturing as a paragon of chaste virtue. A young woman simply won’t perceive sex with you as an admission of sluttiness. She is innocent to herself as well as to you."[1]

Roosh notes, "She is child-like and mostly intolerable. Her speech sounds like another language. She will only have sex when completely trashed, and has few redeeming qualities beyond her body. Says a lot of things that make you think you’re wasting your time. Best game to use: jealousy."[2]

Age 21

Hank Moody notes that a girl 21-25 "appreciates that I'm not writing her odes about my undying love and affection, and seem to want to keep things casual. They're getting hit up at every angle, and they're confused about whether they want to fuck the bartender or the lawyer. Then they realize they can do both with little ramification. I like being seen around town with them. Horrible conversationalists, and I have to dumb down my text messaging. Most of their texts are 'lol ur funny..' Society has told these girls that they can be total whores with no consequences, and eventually some good looking rich guy will scoop them up."[3]

Age 22

The four-year carnival called college is coming to a close. During this time, she’s enjoyed the absolute ride of her life: non-stop parties (as a true Carousel rider), trips, and gorging herself on the buffet of cock available to an American college girl—without the uncomfortable social stigmas of generations past. At a time where previous generations of women were getting nervous if they hadn’t snared a husband, today’s girl is “just getting started.” At this age, today’s girl is irretrievably drunk on her power. Any cautionary advice will be greeted with hubristic ridicule and disbelief.

Age 23

Roissy notes, "The 23-27 year old feels she is at her attractiveness peak, despite her peak having passed a few years earlier. This is because she is surrounded by many more high status men than she was while in college (or working at the Piggly Wiggly) who are expressing sexual interest in her. This social dynamic will work to inflate her ego beyond the bounds of her actual beauty ranking."[1]

Age 25

The first alerts—which go unheeded—that this ride isn’t forever start to rear their heads. The combination of a few harsh pump-and-dumps, and the knowledge that some of her smarter friends are getting hitched, start to impart a hard edge on her personality. Still, with ample beauty left over, most girls will continue to draw from the bank account with impunity. Heartiste writes, "During this age window — late 20s to late 30s — a woman is powerfully aware of the beginning of decline in her number one asset: her beauty. Physically, she is noticing small changes in herself — the first nascent signs of decay — that, assessed from a distance relative to womanhood as a whole aren’t so horrifying, but compared to what she was herself just a few years earlier will split her id wide open. Urgency compels her (if she’s psychologically healthy) to escape the single lady lookatme scene and start seriously buckling down to achieve the goal of snagging a man who will commit to her and, hopefully, help her become part of a family. Naturally, this pressure to settle limits her options and the longer she waits, the more her “Mr. Right” will deviate from the Mr. Right of her teenage dreams."

According to Roosh, "After you wear the t-shirt a couple of times, the fabric loses elasticity. You no longer get excited when wearing it because people have already seen you in it. Your eye starts to wander on new t-shirts (25-29 years old)." Also, according to Roosh's T-shirt analogy, "When you leave the loaf out, it gets a little hard. You have to heat it up with a toaster first, but it still won’t taste fresh. (25-29 years old)"

Roosh also writes, "single women over 25 are emotionally damaged in some way, are alpha widowed, or are professional daters who are incapable of making the proper relationship sacrifices."[4]

Age 26

Hank Moody notes that a girl 26-30 is "Still hot enough to be seen around town with, but they start throwing serious girlfriend vibes - particularly public displays of affection. Sex is practically thrown at you after a few months of dating. You're that good looking rich guy who is going to scoop them up. They know the biological clock is ticking fast, and their family is pushing them to 'settle down.'"

Age 27

Rollo notes, "By the age of 27 women’s SMV decline has begun in earnest. That isn’t to say that women can’t remain stunningly attractive and vivacious in their post-peak years, but comparative to the next crop of 22-23 year olds, the decline progressively becomes more evident. Competition for hypergamously suitable mates becomes more intense with each passing year. The age’s between 27 and 30 are subliminally the most stressful for women as the realization sinks in that they must trade their ‘party years’ short term mating protocol for a long term provisioning strategy."[5]

Age 28

Roissy notes, "28-30 year olds are a mixed bunch. Some are riding a wave of career and social success that has nowhere to go but down, and their bloated egos reflect that. Others, less conventionally successful, are emotionally frazzled by the disappearing act of their heady youth and by the intractability of their singledom. You will find some of the cuntiest, and sweetest, girls in this age range."[1]

Age 29

After repeated pressings of the snooze button, it starts getting harder to ignore the clangor of the alarm clock. Having gotten her fill on the party lifestyle—and starting to feel, if not fully understand, the diminished effectiveness of her fading looks—she declares herself “ready to settle down.” Regrettably, the combination of having very little beauty-capital remaining and impossibly high standards—the product of years of enjoying the high life at the expense of her future solvency—will conspire to keep her single.

Age 30

According to Roosh, "If you leave the bread out for too long, mold develops. You can cut away the mold, toast the bread, and still be able to eat it, but you won’t enjoy it. You’d have to be starving. (30-34 years old)"

Hank Moody notes that a girl 30-36 "Is either divorced or has never been married for a reason. Anthropomorphizes their dog or cat. Struggles with depression issues. Sex is thrown at you. They know that the good looking rich guy is never going to come, and you're simply here for sex and conversation. At this point they would settle for almost any beta willing to commit and risk a geriatric pregnancy."

Heartiste notes that "a man marrying an over-30 woman is investing everything he has in a rapidly depreciating pleasure provider that has already lost a lot of its aesthetic value."[6]

The over-30 woman has likely amassed an impressive knob count. When you marry a 30+ woman, you’re marrying her 30+ cockas. Hope you like getting phantom cucked! As magically prehensile as your penis may be, she’ll never look up to it in cross-eyed awe like she did with her first cock when she was younger, hotter, tighter, and inexperienced.

The over-30 woman is bitter from a wasted prime spent on failed relationships she hoped would lead to marriage. Now that you’re marrying her, she should be grateful, but she's not. . . . .

There’s another, subtle, reason to refuse the wedded diss of marrying the over-30 woman. Now, naturally, if you marry an under-30 woman, the day will come, ostensibly, that she’ll be your over-30 wife. But you’ll have something that chagrined men who married women on the cusp of sagging cups don’t have: Years of very fond, very monopolized, very supple memories. If you maritally snag a 21-year-old minx and occupy her sugar walls for the next ten years, the spermatomically bonded cervix-splattered glue of all those splendid tumbles of passion accrue into something larger than the sum of your individuated speckles. All that young woman heat, heat which will never be replicated with the older version of your wife, captures into limbic amber a network of interlocked, superconductive emotions with the power to sustain lovingrapture a good ways past the poignantly brief era of peak wife ripeness, onward into the elevator muzak era of bland marital inertia (50 years, plus or minus).

You marry an over-30 woman and you’re left grasping at a grease truck menu of curdled, pear-shaped memories and wrinkled recollections for sustenance.


According to trav777, "a woman at 31 is looking for a marriage and kid as a BUCKET LIST ITEM. She is not looking for a husband or a partner or obligations. If she were into that more than herself, she’d have landed a decent man 10 years prior."

Relampago Furioso notes that at 30, the thousand cock stare often develops.[7]

Age 31

Roissy notes:[1]

In some ways, women in the 31-34 age range are the toughest broads to game. (By “toughest”, it is meant “most time consuming”.) It’s counterintuitive, yes, but there are factors at work besides her declining beauty which mitigate against the easy, quick lay. For one, it is obviously harder to meet single 31-34 year old women than it is to meet single younger women. Marriage is still a pussy-limiting force to contend with for the inveterate womanizer, but Chateau apprentices are hard at work battling the scourge of mating market disturbances caused by the grinding and churning of the marriage machine.

But the bigger reason 31-34 year olds are harder to game than any other age group of women has to do with the wicked nexus of entitlement and self-preservation that occurs at this age in women. When you combine a disproportionate sense of entitlement fueled by years of feminism, steady paychecks and promotions, and cheerleading gay boyfriends with suspicions of every man’s motives and a terrible anxiety of being used for a sexual fling sans marriage proposal, you get a venom-spitting malevolent demoness on guard against anything she might perceive as less than total subjugation to her craving for incessant flattery and princess pedestaling.


Age 32

The magical years are officially gone, and the long descent to complete invisibility to the opposite sex is well underway. Thanks to social programming (e.g., Sex in the City and the myth that “a woman’s sexual prime is in her 30s”), she can rationalize that her “Mr. Right” will arrive any minute. However, she’s likely to become little more than a second- or third-stringer in a player’s long roster of options. A few of these women will get bailed out by blue-pill betas, who still buy into the marriage trap, and don’t realize (or care) they’re buying a used car with the odometer rolled back. But this marriage is almost certainly doomed to divorce-failure, since nothing can ever compete with her 15-year prime-time binge. She will be nagged by dissatisfaction the moment her last party–her wedding–ends.

She enjoyed the Sweet 15, but she’ll enjoy little more.

GBFM writes that with 32-year-olds, it's necessary to get a "leaf-blower to get all the dust off".

Age 35

According to Roosh's T-shirt analogy, "Eventually, holes develop in the fabric. It has been used too many times. Now it is only good to clean the toilet bowl before finally being placed in the trash. (35 and up)." Also, according to his bread analogy, "If you leave it for even longer, mold takes over and completely destroys the bread. There is no way to excise the toxic portions. You must throw it away before the mold makes you sick. (35 and up)" Relampago writes:[8]

Women “expire” at age 35 for numerous reasons. Their fertility declines sharply at this age. Their beauty declines, no matter how much makeup they cake on. If not already married to her, from this moment forward she offers nothing to a partner but a well-used piece of anatomy and a manipulative, even predatory disposition towards men and their finances.

The expiration date may fluctuate around age 35 for a couple of reasons, i.e. good genetics or a sweet personality (usually being faked) but this age is a good baseline for the “expiration date” for females.


Age 40

Heartiste writes, "The final romantic life cycle for women (ages 40-death), this stage is the longest and, sadly from the perspective of one who adores women when they are at their most womanish, the dreariest, though it does offer as consolation a tranquilizing serenity that can safely usher a woman through her middle years without resort to painkillers. In this cycle, a woman still harbors those tingles for the alpha jerk, but they are sufficiently suppressed by biomechanic winding-down and stone cold circumstance — her wilted bloom — to allow the flourishing of her other female needs. Those other needs center around her desire to a) not be abandoned to a cold cruel sexual market and b) enjoy at least facsimiles of reciprocal love so that she does not feel abandoned within her relationship."

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 12 Comments [4/6/2017 12:43:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125571

The busted dudes test is, according to Roosh, the only quality one needs to look for when deciding where to stay while abroad: "Is it common to see a busted guy with a pretty girl on his arm?" If within my first day in a country one sees pretty girls with busted dudes who aren't decked out in Hugo Boss or gold jewelry, one knows the sexual market is skewed in the man’s favor.[1] According to Roosh, the busted test "Includes everything. A guy with an okay face but 30 pounds overweight wearing jean shorts and white tube socks would be classified as busted."[2]

Roosh V, Kings Wiki 13 Comments [3/20/2017 1:42:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125831

My wife mostly does what I tell her but sometimes she gets scared of sex with me. I'll admit I can be rough and I have kinks I'm into. But when I'm horny, I don't have time for her to say no

So I enforce the fact that in marriage, there is no saying no when it comes to sex. There is no rape. I reminded her of this very thing last night when she tried to tell me no. The sooner she understands, the faster she'll so crying and accept my cock up her ass, her pussy, her mouth, in her fucking ear. Whatever mood that strikes me.

Women need to learn their place in a man's world.

Anonymous, Raw Confessions 14 Comments [4/7/2017 7:11:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125837

Simps/White Knights/Betas/Orbiters need to be purged.

So, I was just browsing Normiegram and somehow stumbled onto the page of an instawhore with 3 million followers. Decided to see who makes up the majority of her followers, no surprise.. it's simps. There is no fucking way that 3 million men can lust after 1 talentless whore. This over abundance of dick makes the incel struggle harder because now any average, fat, or ugly whore can get on instagram and have a million simps worshipping her. Then these whores develop an ego the size of Jupiter in real life. Its already bad enough we have to compete with fucking Chads, now these bitches think they deserve to be treated like goddesses too. Despite all of this, I don't blame the whores, I blame the remedial betas who worship these bitches. If more of these men woke the fuck up then maybe our gender wouldn't be treated like shit, people would go back to dating their looksmatch, and incels would finally get a taste of "love". Until then fuck betas, simps, white knights, orbiters, normies, and anyone who agrees with this unfair system. Betas make it so that women get an over abundance of love, while incels get none.

TL;DR: Fuck Thirsty Betas.

ElliotsDisciple, /r/incels 8 Comments [3/30/2017 4:12:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Nice Guy™ In A Nutshell

Quote# 124146

Opening doors for women is a chivalrous activity that gives men an opportunity to check out and/or smack women's asses.

Article "Holding doors for women", Kings Wiki 24 Comments [2/1/2017 12:49:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125921

I am a woman (aged 30), and I have to agree that we (women) are too emotional and not rational or logical enough to have the right to vote. Most women are intelligent but we allow our emotions to take over and we don't often think straight. I have never voted because we should not have the right to vote. Men are often naturally more level headed, rational and logical and understand politics better that women do.

Julie83, Debate 17 Comments [4/2/2017 3:20:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: PETF

Quote# 126482

I hate females

My Truecelibacy has led me to enlightenment. Nowadays I hate every single female that I see. When I walk I have my head upright with a neutral facial expression.

I have stopped acknowledging that females exist. My only goal is the models and bottles lifestyle at Goldman Sachs. Females are not human anyway and should be enslaved immediately.

BeingaHero, /r/incels 6 Comments [4/19/2017 12:41:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125722

It’s just more evidence that feminism has been, and continues to be, a Hate Machine dedicated to churning out Big Lies about the sexes and about their roles in society, with the express purpose of handicapping boys and men and lavishing extreme favoritism and government largesse on girls and women.

It’s silly to argue feminism is a symptom, rather than a cause, of a broken society when its agenda has directly contributed to so much social disruption, antagonism, distrust, resentment, and national decline. This is like arguing Marxism, Freudianism, Communism, SCALE, and GloboHomoism are symptoms of some deeper, underlying, corrupting force that bedevils the West. Large, society-spanning movements are as much cause as symptom of social degeneration. We’re splitting vellus hairs here.

If one wants to argue for a First Cause of the West’s decline, the most promising culprit would be Hajnalianism, but for some reason those who find SCALE objectionable rarely tackle the subject of inherited empathobesity.

Feminism as a distinctive movement really got started as a vanity project of masculinized or otherwise oddball women [link to Wikipedia article on Mary Wollstonecraft] who were for various reasons uncomfortable in the world of women. Its leaders — and one shouldn’t neglect to mention the preponderance of feminist leaders were and are Jewish women and their co-tribal male suckups — were able to leverage their gripes to a wider audience of women who had become frustrated and flustered and, in plenty of cases, enthused, by the postindustrial revolution shocks to the social system that, critically, severed fecundity from sex and community from individual.

There was never a feminist movement that had its origins in widespread complaints about male discrimination against working women. That is a myth. Pre-20th Century Western women worked plenty, either on the home or off it. Wives working as apprentices to their husbands’ businesses was fairly common in Medieval Europe.

What feminism has been, and what it remains today, is a propaganda howitzer to mow down the natural order and replace it with an inverted dystopia in which the defining feature is the removal of all constraints on female sexuality and the maximization of restrictions on male sexuality. As in any social movement, the breath of its life emerges first from the sticky goo of the sexual market.

Lies have consequences, and the Big Lies of Feminism and Antiracism have destroyer-of-worlds consequences. They must be fought with a vengeance.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 4 Comments [3/25/2017 10:57:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 123169

A man has veto power to decide who his wife doesn't have as friends, but the courts view that as abuse. Biblically, a man is to rule over his wife with Christ's love, but he is still her boss when he doesn't love her as he ought. If we only obeyed the government when our leaders are perfect, we'd have total anarchy. If a wife doesn't clean the house, her husband is the only one who can rebuke her. Who else is going to do it? The court's consider that as “domestic abuse.” A feminist psychologist would diagnose such a lazy wife with “posttraumatic stress,” blaming the husband for picking on his wife. No psychologist will diagnosis a woman with lack character; but rather, send her to a psychiatrist for a drug prescription. This is how “the system” works. Literally, a wife can slack off and shirk her wifely duties and a husband has no recourse of action.

Is it any wonder why men don't want to get married these days? Think about it! A man's wife can deny him sex, refuse to cook him a meal, refuse to get him a drink, refuse to clean the house, refuse to do anything, and there's absolutely NOTHING he can do about it. Yet, she can easily obtain a free (government pro-bono paid) lawyer simply be alleging “abuse,” drag him into court, and the judge will crucify him. This is not justice! Destroying marriages is not helping society. Courts never require a couple to undergo a mandatory year of counseling before considering a divorce. The reason why is because the banksters can't steal your home if you call off the divorce. The reason why is because the New World Order can't succeed if your marriage is restored. CPS can't steal your children if mom and dad have a happy marriage. And the truth is, the heathen world can offer no real help for your struggling marriage, because they reject the holy God of the holy Bible. Psalms 1:1-2, “Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.” The Bible has all the answers!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 18 Comments [12/23/2016 2:25:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 52515

[Why does pop culture want men to be sissies?]

shaun3701 - The pussification of men has been going on for decades, and it's time we put a stop to it.

pondi86 -
Case in Point: The new Bond film Quantum of Solace, which features a highly unrealistic (pseudo) strong, (pseudo) independent and (pseudo) intelligent bond girl. Most women know (even if they would never admit it) the strong, independent woman is an act put on and encouraged by man-hating feminists and women by design and nature are generally demure, secondary

shaun3701 & pondi86, IMDb 79 Comments [11/19/2008 3:41:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125330





unknow, slideshare.net 17 Comments [3/12/2017 2:10:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125331



unknow, slideshare.net 21 Comments [3/12/2017 2:15:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126496

Feminist writing is one of the most horribly brutal assaults on the English language that ever came out of academia. It makes legalese sound like fine poetry in comparison.

I suspect that a lot of the rage comes from the fact that feminists tend to have an inability to think objectively, hence their constant attacks on objectivity. I don’t think it’s just willful solipsism; it’s a real mental disability (in an academic setting at least). Universities were founded on the masculine ideal of objective thought, so feminists have a permanent outsider status no matter how many jobs they get at universities. Therefore, they can only “deconstruct” (i.e. destroy) the foundations of Western scholarship. Hence the belligerent language and failure to contribute anything meaningful at all.

I really don’t think we’ll be able to restore our standards without re-segregating universities by sex. Maybe somebody can leverage the campus rape hysteria for just that purpose, although I’m not hopeful.

Bill P, Unz 5 Comments [4/20/2017 1:39:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126485

In a society where both are treated fairly females will seek more and more privileges until they have more power, which is exactly what has happened in every country in the West. Females need to be controlled. Their sexuality and hypergamous nature need to be controlled and they need to be treated as commodities. Otherwise, civilization will fall do to their selfish hypergamous nature, just as Western society is slowly crumbling right now.

CheesyFedora, /r/incels 10 Comments [4/19/2017 12:42:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126342

He's not wrong. Feminism seems obsessed with promoting degeneracy above all. Encouraging women to have loads of promiscuous sex, kill their own babies, cheat on their husbands. Want to get an education in science or engineering or medicine? Want to become a good mother and raise good children? Nah, fuck that. The best thing you can do is be a whore and do drugs and swallow cum at college.

Leaderofgamergate, Reddit 10 Comments [4/15/2017 11:24:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126382

I make life HELL for my normie roommate

Dude think he can just have bitches stay here when he's out, I get straight up and tell that bitch to leave, you can't be here unattended you don't live here ho bye bye. Then I make sure I NEVER go out when they are in so they get no alone time, I sometimes go out for 4 minutes just to trick them ahahaahaha, you'll never get any peace here normscum the ree is too strong in me. I also report them illegal tenants to the dorm building when over too much so they'll get evicted if they get another strike, aw poor normies.

AprilYi, /r/incels 13 Comments [4/16/2017 5:01:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126077

If you can stand it, I advise any incel to spend a few minutes perusing some female-oriented romantic literature, movies, manga, etc.

Do this, and try and note the personality traits of the male characters. I'm not just talking about the inevitable white knighting male lead character who saves the dumb annoying "quirky" female lead. Look at ALL the male characters. You'll notice certain themes and patterns.

1) Any man who is short or low-to-average attractiveness is fucking invisible. They are jokey side characters, comic relief, the nonthreatening best friend who never gets to fuck the lead female - that, or completely insignificant.

Lesson: This is the best any of us will ever do IRL. Females will see you as friend material, never fuck material. If they do get in a relationship with you (not likely) they will be pining for a tall handsome Chad all the while.

2) Men who ARE significant to the female's romantic arc will have the following traits: hard as nails, stoic, ambitious, unafraid of violence, dominant, a born leader, barks orders at people, strong jaw, large hands, is always grabbing the female lead or physically imposing himself on her (would be assault if a beta did it), faces down other males with a steely glint in his eye, is possessive and sexually jealous, yet will steal other men's girls at the drop of a hat, has good taste and dresses well in accordance with some recognizable stock male fashion trope.

Think about the traits of the male character females view as potential candidates for sex. And now apply some basic logic. What kind of person is this man? He's violent, he's brutal, he takes what he wants by force if necessary, he does and gets whatever he wants regardless of the risk to himself or others, he has no care for the rules or norms of society, he will fight to the death over a female, he will steal mates whenever possible. This person is a fucking degenerate, if everyone was like him, society would not last a day. He is a powderkeg, a walking time bomb who brings violence, chaos and disorder in his wake wherever he goes.

Yet this is what females are attracted to, in their heart of hearts. Fifty Shades. Twilight. Romantic comedies. Shoujo. K-drama. Insipid western medical dramas where the staff all sleep with each other. If it's female oriented this type of male character will abound, and devastation (social, sexual, often physical) will be the result.

Females prefer chaos and drama to stability, order and virtue. They want men fighting over her, the ability to maintain a harem of men with different traits (the noble protector, the dark selfish hedonist, the kind provider) who can give facilitate her experiencing different feelings when she's in the mood for them. Being universally wanted, breaking up other people's relationships while having the moral deniability of it being the fault of the men involved who just can't help but want her...

These things are sick, and yet, it is what FHOs desire. This is why men spent so long creating a system where the laws and customs of society and older, wiser heads determined who and when a female would marry, rather than just letting the FHO's selfish impulses run wild. The world is going to shit as a result of women's liberation and sadly, there is nothing that can be done to stop it.

As usual, the moral of the story remains the same: Lie down and fucking rot.


u/EveryDayIsANightmare, r/incels 13 Comments [4/7/2017 7:22:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: sister of battle

Quote# 125661

Roastie

The degenerated condition of the average sexually-liberated western female's vagina, as a result of riding the cock carousel through her teens and 20's before hitting the wall and trying to get one of the beta bux -- who she denied while it was still tight and she still looked good -- to put a ring on her finger and lick her recycled Arby's; which he will, because the world is full of thirsty beta enablers stupid enough to marry women who have had their capacity to love atomized into obliteration over a decade of getting shaken like she's in a paint shaker and then painted by cocks whose names she doesn't even remember.

Beta Bux Bill: I'm so happy to be marrying her. I had such a crush on her in high school, but she wouldn't even look at me. But now she's a bit less tight, a bit more blown out, her face lost a few points with the sun damage and semen damage, and, well, actually she's a full-blown roastie, actually it looks like roadkill between her legs, but that's okay, she's my soulmate, and I'm taking the high road by inviting all of the guys she fucked to the wedding; we needed to rent a megachurch.

Stacy the Fiance: "Who's that guy you invited to the wedding?"
Beta Bux Bill: "That's Chad, you said to invite him?"
Stacy the Fiance: "Oh, yeah! I'm gonna go say hi to him before we start the ceremony"
** 10 minutes they've both been gone **
** moans coming from the toilet **


MrChase, Urban Dictionary 27 Comments [3/23/2017 6:07:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 120554

Just speaking from my own experience here. I dont believe in platonic relationships. Unless the guy is gay or impotent. No just impotent, because gay guys would still do it. LOL..

My ex had a lot more guy friends than girl friends. Also her "best friend" was a guy, she told me this in the beginning. I trusted her but in the back of my mind was still a bit leery.

For good reason. She slept with her best friend and another friend. Who knows how long they have been sleeping together, but I was not there to find out. I was gone real fast.

Bottom line a guy will always want to fuck his girl friends, he's hoping to be that shoulder to lean on. Or just hang out get drunk and have casual sex as if its nothing.


onedaily, isitnormal.com 10 Comments [7/17/2016 6:56:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125896

Multiple, means anything more than 1. Why don't you put the number of countries dominated by female entrepreneurs right next the number dominated by male entrepreneurs and you'll see how useless your point is. You'd be hard press to find a company like Apple, Shell, Fedex, Oracle etc that employes tens of thousands of people that was founded by women. That's simply the truth. And even if you did, for every one you could find there are thousand more founded by men.

"You're putting the entire responsibility for reproduction and families on women. You're reducing me to my uterus, basically, while men are allowed to be actual human beings. And next you're going to tell me that my sole worth is in my appearance and sexiness, because that's the only way I could attract a man."

Huh? A women that puts motherhood above career is not allowed to be a human? So being a corporate slave/workhorse while outsourcing parenting to a nanny is a more noble endeavor than being a mother? What can be more noble than raising a child?

"Women as passive baby receptacles isn't even actual evolution or reality in nature, just wishful thinking"

It isn't? Until men evolve a uterus, you'll just have to be wrong here.

"Our society moves faster than evolution, now. We survive and reproduce at an unsustainable rate because we're brilliant: we've figured out how to utilize all of the intelligence of our species, black or white, male or female, through movements towards social equality. Now we can take advantage of all of the inventions and progress that could have been made by anyone, without relegating them to slave's status."

None of this amounts to anything if a society can't even sustain its population. Germany is now down to 1.4 children per family. In a few hundred years, places like Germany and Sweden will be a Muslim countries because the native born gave up on having kids. The only way these liberal, feminist societies can sustain their numbers is by mass immigration from countries that DON'T have feminist values(i.e. women actually see family and motherhood as a communal duty). If a society can't sustain itself, something is broken.

"Women have changed our society for the better. The first investigative journalist was a woman (Nellie Bly). The idea for public defenders came from a woman (Clara Foltz). Women invented computer programming languages (Ada Lovelace) AND wireless transmission (Hedy Lamarr). Kevlar? Windshield wipers? CCTV? All women. The entire genre of science fiction began because of a woman's novel (Mary Shelley)."

You REALLY don't want to get into is a tit-for-tat over what sex has been the most inventive. You will lose this argument. Trust me on this. For every invention by women, there have been thousands more by men. If men and women were equal in this endeavor then 50% of ALL inventions should be by women. But they never will be for the same reason that women athletes don't compete with males: biology.

"How about we acknowledge that women are incredibly worthwhile human beings, and so are men, and start giving people reasons and incentives to raise families together? Without sabotaging either one's life."

We already had this for tens of thousands of years. It's feminist that came along and taught women that having children is tantamount to slavery and they'd be better served working for (male-dominated companies) and being childless corporate slaves instead.

Osjajeo, The Economist 2 Comments [4/1/2017 8:44:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125860

You want Roissy ran out of town on a rail. There is a good chance he “raped” your girlfriend, and if he did not, he had her before you, or will have her after you.

But who is going to run Roissy out of town on a rail? No one has incentive to do so, or legitimate authority to do so, unless husbands and fathers have property rights in women’s sexual and domestic services.

So if you want a society where Roissy gets run out of town on a rail, or better, shot like a dog, you need a society where husbands and fathers have legitimate, socially recognized, legally recognized, and legally enforced property rights in women’s sexual and domestic services, where a husband or a father can legally and morally legitimately shoot Roissy for sniffing around where he should not, as he can shoot a burglar for sniffing around where he should not.

And if you start “protecting” unowned women from Roissy (“oh the poor things”) you are abandoning male property rights in women.

The system that Victorians liked to pretend that they had, where unowned, unprotected, and uncontrolled women were presumed to be chaste and of comparable value to owned, controlled, and protected women, is not incentive compatible. No one has strong motivation to protect the society that you piously pretend that you have. You are not upvaluing unprotected women. You are downvaluing wives and daughters.

You cannot have the supposed Victorian and the supposed Puritan system, for the same reason as the Victorians and the Puritans could not have it either. The Victorian system resulted in far too many women giving birth in the rain in dark alleys, resulting in far too many Oliver Twists, resulting in the welfare state, resulting in far too many women marrying Uncle Sam the big Pimp. And here we are.

If you start “protecting” unowned women from Roissy you are not going to succeed, because unowned women are uncontrolled women. And your entire intended system goes down the drain.

You cannot “protect” unowned women from seduction and “rape“, because women are notoriously uncooperative with anyone trying to “protect” them.

Whereupon, surprise surprise, no one runs Roissy out of town no matter how much the preacher vainly rants about chastity.

If chastity is based on male property rights in women, unowned women are outside the system and are presumed to be unchaste – and need to be outside so that they can be discriminated against and treated as of lesser value and lesser worth. Roissy screwing unowned women cannot be allowed to matter, because unowned women cannot be allowed to matter.

High estimates of the number of whores in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century where not based on the modern usage of “whore” to mean a woman rents her pussy for cash by the hour, but rather, were estimates of the number of unowned, and thus presumed to be unchaste, women. Similarly “sluts”.

You cannot keep women permanently chained to the wall. You are going to have to let them loose every now and then to take care of the baby, pick up the socks, and cook the meals. So you need to have a system that is incentive compatible with what women want. If women get entirely their way, civilization collapses, because most men will not have posterity, so will not plant trees for their grandchildren to enjoy the shade. So you need to have a system where male ownership of women is incentive compatible with what women want, where women have reason to cooperate in a system that restrains their worst excesses. So you have to downvalue unowned women and upvalue owned women. And if you downvalue unowned women, you cannot allow yourself to care about what Roissy gets up to. (Unless of course, he starts sniffing around your wife or daughter, in which case you shoot him like a dog, and the cops shrug their shoulders and say “needed killing”.)

The problem is not that women want to bang multiple high value alpha males. They want to bang only one high value alpha male, and that high value alpha male also wants them to bang only that one high value alpha male. The problem is that finding themselves of low rank the high value alpha male’s ever growing harem, they start playing off one high value alpha male against another high value alpha male in order to raise their value. The solution is to associate this tactic with being low value. And if allow ourselves to care about what Roissy gets up to, we are upvaluing women who employ this tactic. No one should care about what unowned women get up to, or about what happens to them, thus motivating unowned women to come in from the cold, and owned women to stay where it is warm.

It does not matter if the archbishop proclaims that all fertile age women are the property of their father or husband. He can, and should proclaim that all fertile age women should be the property of their father or husband, but short of keeping them all permanently chained to the dungeon wall, not all of them are going to actually be the property of their father or husband. Hence Roissy.

If we could stop unowned women from seducing Mohammed, then we could have the system that the Victorians and the Puritans pretended that they had. But we cannot.

Or if we could prevent significant numbers of women from becoming unowned, then we could have the system that the Victorians and the Puritans pretended that they had. But that would require measures that are extreme, cruel, disturbing, and, worst of all, inconvenient.

Jim, Jim's Blog 11 Comments [3/31/2017 2:13:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125460


It has been said to me that I must hate feminism so much because I hate women.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

It is because I actually care about my fellow women that I loathe feminism and speak out against it so often. Feminism is a way for a small number of very evil men to gain control over a large segment of other men. Women are merely useful pawns (but oh, how useful!).

Feminism in no way, shape, or form leads to outcomes that are in women’s best interests. The incredible decline in average happiness of modern women, as documented by the very liberal Wolfers and Stevenson, compared to just a few decades ago is evidence of the misery that feminism has inflicted upon Womankind.

Sunshine Thiry, Sunshine Thiry 12 Comments [3/17/2017 2:48:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 20575

[Regarding courtship]

[I have a question, in all these situations it seems assumed that the man makes the first move or hears from God (in new-manna's post). Is it, in your respected circles where this takes place, acceptable or customary for the woman involved to make the first move? I do not know much about this practice and I'm just curious as to what ya'll and those in your churches or communities think and believe.]

NO. The girl is not to make the first move. It is the guy's responsibility to seek the will of the girls father.

Bro. Randy, Teens-4-Christ 56 Comments [2/12/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: The Watcher

Quote# 125971

I became a witness to female empowerment

I was sitting on the bus and a conductor got on it. He went to a girl and after she showed him her ticket he told her she is beautiful( she was tbh).

The horny idiot did not realise that by complimenting her he empowered her and raised her ego even more. Now she thinks she is a godess and men should praise her by fapping to her pictures and sacrifcing their sperm to her beauty.

Men like him should be punished because they enhance the female privileges and contribute to the inceldom problem.

thegambler953, /r/incels 11 Comments [4/3/2017 12:05:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126078

Are women biologically programmed to reward cruelty, evil and domination?
Of course any complaints that girls go for bad boys and jerks instantly labels one a nice guy beta males. To the extent that it is possible, I actually consider myself somewhat of an impartial outside observer. I was an omega jerk in JR and high school, and to an extent my whole psycho personality, worked and I had girls literally chasing me. A lot of it might have been self-delusion but some measures were objective. After that I was in nearly complete isolation in college. So I've never played the role of the bitter nice guy. I have NEVER done anything nice for a girl or anyone my entire life! So I think I have some claim to impartiality, and my position that my deep depression and heart anguish is purely on a metaphysical level.

I read a lot of PUA seduction Game literature. At first my logic was it pays to learn all tools of rhetoric, persuasion and oratory even if I intended to put it to different uses than PUA.

Anyway to put it at its simplest. In cavemen times women were just plaything rape slaves for the strongest ape. And that is what evolutionary psychology in chimpanzee and gorilla behavior proves. Now there might have been some brave women who defended their freedom to the death, but their selfish genes were lost to history. And the genes that all modern women have inherited is those who submit to the cruelest caveman with biggest club.

I don't know for me it is pretty hellish to live in a world where all men are sadists and all women are masochists.

According to PUA science male physical attractiveness barely matters at all, the only thing women find attractive is brute domination and sadism.

For the last year I've completely cut myself off from humanity. Who wants to live in a world of pure evil? Only evil is rewarded! Cruelty is the only virtue. What good is morality and ethics?

So I'd like an outside opinion do you feel that women are biologically programmed to reward cruelty, evil and domination?

Does the dating world going back to the new paleolithic age make life worthless?
Murdoch's theoretical journal which is the official ideology of America and thus the entire world has endorsed the evopsych worldview: The New Dating Game | The Weekly Standard

Now I'm sure no one will believe me, but this is NOT about me being a single virgin loser guy who can't get a date. More its about what kind of world we live in where evil is always rewarded. I can't live in a universe like that. Why bother to get a job and support oneself and live in brutal ruthless dog eat dog world of evil? My parents are going to throw me out in August since I wont get a job or school.

Its true I've always been kind of an anti-sexual puritan but evopsych just makes it more vicious. The Darwinian-Nietzschean struggle for existence means eat or be eaten, kill or be killed, harm or be harmed. I wish simply to neither dominate nor be dominated. But that is far too much to ask in this world on both counts.

I have no harmed anyone, except maybe my parents. My dad says I should be "altrusitic" and recover for my mom's sake.

First off my parents committed a massive injustice on me by bringing me into this cruel world just to satisfy that monster gene- Moloch.

Second them keeping me alive, is just their genes following their selfish interest to reproduce. I represent a major investment in their genes survival. My fall means a major decrease in their genese reproducing. So that is all there is to their so-called generosity to me. The longer they keep me fed, the longer the opportunity there is for me to pass their genes on. Granted thats a pretty miniscule chance for grandkids hiding and crying in the basement, but its higher than the chances if I starved on the street.

So what gratitude should I have to the selfish gene? The "altruism" in feeding and housing me is just the flip side of the selfishness of birthing me into an incredibly hellish universe.

Humanity wants to drive itself off a cliff. I listed my objections. Much wiser men than me have listed them in thick textbooks. Humanity wont listen to the wise men and certainly not to me. So fine. I have said my peace. Let humanity drive off the cliff, but I want no part in the adventure.

I feel nothing for disgust for humanity. But thats what the Darwinian struggle for existence. Brutality is the only virtue. I'm what the Nazis would call life unworthy of life. Even if your content to be a lifelong virgin girls rewarding "bad boy" traits still affects the world you live in. I could not be more repulsed by humanity which is why I have cut myself off in complete isolation for nearly a year now. Would life be better, and free of despair if I saw other humans as unthinking moving objects instead of minds ?

From studying evopsych I have grown deeply disturbed and hateful of humanity. A bunch of sadistic beasts, red in tooth and claw, angling for domination. I wish to never see another human being ever again. I've cut myself off for over a year hiding in the basement till my parents throw me out.

Maybe it be better if I was unaware of humans possessing other minds. If I viewed them as rocks, chairs, hurricanes, viruses. Then I would have no more hate towards victimizers and sympathy towards victims than I hate cancer or a hurricane. Or pity for a dead tree. Just look at humans as moving objects on the landscape.

Would that make things better?

Well in essence this IS about relationships. That is where evolutionary psychology is most obvious in daily life. While it is true I have no human relations, I'm still affected by the sexual stock market, the same way someone who owns no stock can be ruined by a crash.

Psychologists are humans like the rest of us, driven by the reptilian urges for sex and power and domination. There career choice is just there way of gaining domination in the Darwinian game. So I don't see therapists as some elite priestly caste free from evopsych. I don't want to be "fixed" into better being able to play the evolutionary game.

Since everyone here accepts the basic premises of evopsych, I ask how do YOU folks deal with it? Or do you all just accept the game, and try to be the winner? IF thats the case, then maybe your right and there can not be any dialogue between me and humanity.

I don't understand how the rest of humanity can endure such a world and assume its because they must ALL be blood-thirsty vampires themselves.

Although why glorify women as the victims? According to evopsych even when given freedom they will reward cruelty.

So there are no victims in this monstrous world just wolves eating wolves.

How do you endure this world? And what is your advice for me?

What good would having a girlfriend do me? Is the chimpanzee in me supposed to rejoice that as low as I may be in the hierarchy, I still have someone below me who I can hurt, torment, dominate and abuse?


I have no problem being driven out of the sexual marketplace. The problem is what "service" are we competing for? And it seems in the sexual market it is who can be the most brutal and cruel. Evopsych says getting a girlfriend comes down to demonstrating cruelty, domination, brutality, and sadism.


That is all I see in male-female relations and PUa science backs up my personal observations.

Mopenhauer, halfsigma 6 Comments [4/7/2017 7:22:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Mayasmom

Quote# 125347

If you're considering therapy and your therapist isn't directing you to the nearest maxillofacial specialist within the first 15 minutes of your first appointment then...

You just got maliciously played for your hard earned incel money. Your therapist should be calling you ugly within the first 10 minutes of talking if they are legit. If your therapist isn't encouraging you to get your face fixed as soon as humanely possible then you need to walk out immediately and demand a reimbursement.

The only reason you should see a therapist is to collude together so you can do some proper social networking together in order to optimize your success for receiving donations on your GoFundMe page so you can fund your surgeries.

Looks-are-everything, /r/incels 20 Comments [3/12/2017 1:13:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125422

It’s an open question whether our Masturbators of the Universe intentionally or accidentally unleashed forces (abortion, condoms, the Pill, penicillin, poz, female economic self-sufficiency aka the Six Sirens of the Sexual Apocalypse) that would sever at every level sex from marriage and children, and thus lead to the low fertility of the West and the poisoning of relationships that naturally percolates when women are surrounded by weak, deferential men and men are left with the prospect of marrying road-worn sluts who secretly still pine for the dazzling cads of their nightclub bathroom passion play memories, but it’s indisputable that the oligarchs and Bezosians and open border 1%ers prefer a deracinated, dehumanized world bazaar with women freed from the constraints of early marriage and motherhood to consume, capitulate, and clog the globohomo capitalist self-negate machine as happy little office cogs.

In my opinion, the current situation is unsustainable. Something’s gotta give. In a near-future post, I will explain how our postmodern sexual market dovetails with evidence that the West is careening toward idiocracy.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 26 Comments [3/15/2017 3:36:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126526

JOBLESS? Blame women!!

BLAME THE WOMEN!!!!!

Women fought tooth and nail to have the opportunity to work just like men and any man who said women should stay at home with the kids was called a sexist who wanted to chain women to the stove.

Women entered the work force doubling the labour force while reducing its worth - wages haven't moved up since 70s but the cost of living has resulting in two income house holds becoming the norm.

Women realise work isn't fun and want to retire 30 years earlier in their 30s and play house but realise they need a man whose income can support a family - they can't find one so they blame men for being losers.

No. Women created this situation and are now reaping their rewards.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 9 Comments [4/21/2017 11:06:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126237

Feminism has destroyed more families than Adolf Hitler ever did.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 8 Comments [4/11/2017 10:26:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126467

The rule on hitting girls should be, “don’t hit someone else’s girl”. If a girl is misbehaving, you should call for the man who is in charge of her, ask him to take care of the problem, and if he does not, you should punch him out, not his girl.

Moldilocks went to the free speech rally in Berkeley declaring she was going to collect one hundred fascist scalps. She was wearing brass knuckle gloves, having watched too many Hollywood movies where action girl takes out five mooks while doing a backflip. She threw glass bottles at people.

A gentleman should never under any circumstances strike a lady, but Moldilocks was no lady.

If an unowned, unsupervised women, gets beaten by some male, your default presupposition, your prejudgment of the situation absent other evidence, should be that males are generally well behaved, unsupervised and uncontrolled women are frequently badly behaved, therefore chances are that she probably needed a beating.

Women are, of course, the precious sex, and men are the expendable sex. It is right that men should die for their women. Men have a duty to love and cherish their women, and women do not have a duty to love and cherish their men, but a duty to honor and obey. But not all women are precious. Unowned women frequently behave in ways that make them less valuable, and more expendable, than men. Observe that Moldilocks was beautiful, became a porngirl (her ranking is too low to qualify as pornstar) became unattractive with astonishing speed, her inner ugliness becoming externally manifest. Her inner ugliness made manifest revealed that this woman was worthless trash.

Some women are precious, not all women are precious. It is entirely OK to punch porngirls, especially unattractive porngirls. No punching cute porngirls in the face, but measures less likely to mar them are fine.

Women are precious because they can create life, whereas all a man can do is merely kill someone. A woman can make you immortal, whereas all a man can do is merely kill you. But porngirl Moldilocks is not going to make you immortal, so no great loss spoiling her face even further.

Jim, Jim's Blog 13 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125840

"girls don't care about your wrist size"

wrong, they care about the implications of small wrists. Small wrists = small frame = low t = uglier less masculine face

lanacelray, /r/incels 9 Comments [3/30/2017 4:12:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126596



Won't get too many Amens here.

Michael Jordan, Facebook 16 Comments [4/23/2017 12:20:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 115774

Reminder: Even demographics are against incels [RedPill]

The reasons for this are very simple...

1) The male to female ratio at birth is circa 105:100. Assuming that every woman has a male equivalent according to attractiveness (e.g. the equivalent of the most attractive female is the most attractive male, and so on), this leads to almost 5% of males not having a female equivalent their age at all. So even the most hideous and fat woman in your area and age group would be above the bottom 5 percentiles of men (aka truecels). The 105:100 ratio basically remains unchanged until late adolescence, when it slowly begins to approach 1:1. This ratio is finally reached around age 50 - a poor consolation for all those dispensable, young sub 5-percentile males out there.

2) But the reality is even worse than that. Most western countries have a fertility rate below replacement level (less than 2.1 births/woman). As a result, each year the number of births will be smaller than the year before. For males, this has disadvantageous effects on the dating market. Women generally seek out partners who are 1-3 years older than themselves and vice versa. However, the low birth rates result in the situation that there are fewer young females out there for the numerous older males.

As an illustration, I've got some numbers from Germany from 2014, where the fertility rate is very low:

Number of men born in 1991: ~479,900
Number of women bon in 1994: ~406,800
Difference: ~73,100
Male to female ratio: ~1.18

As you can see, for sub 15th percentile men it would be virtually impossible (or very hard) to find a girl three years younger than themselves (i.e. girls who would be the most receptive to their approaches). Sure, they can try to find a girl their own age but then they will have to compete with men who are some years older who are again a)more numerous because of the falling number of births b)more mature and therefore generally more desired and c)have a higher income. The only other alternative seems to be MILF-game.

I think the change of fertility rate is also the reason why getting a partner as a man is percieved to be more difficult now than it used to be because the fertility rate was higher back then. This also applies to (many) third world countries. A 25-year-old man in Nigeria, where each year there are considerably more births than the year before, can have his pick from an abundant pool of women who are 20 and younger. Hence, inceldom is most likely a non-issue in such countries whereas every first-world country is known to have a significant percentage of young men who simply stay behind in terms of dating.

3) The number of single immigrant men often exceeds the number of single immigrant women. Men are more likely to have the financial means and the willingness to take risks to immigrate alone while the women who immigrate are often already engaged of married. Of course, immigrant men try to enter the local dating market. On the other hand, natives often can't access foreign women the same way because they come from cultures (Muslim, Hindu) where women are heavily discouraged from having premarital relationships. In many Western European countries a big part of the immigrants comes from such cultures. Even if foreigners, especially ethnics, have a hard time dating local women, some of them will succeed due to high individual LMS or some kind of racial fetishism from the woman. Even a relatively small percentage of women who are open to dating foreigners is enough to skew the odds in the dating market a little bit against men once again.



tl;dr: If you're a truecel and objectively belong to the most unattractive men in your age group, it really doesn't make sense to even try and waste your energy. You can actively look out for the most ugly girls on the street - chances are you're still statistically below her in todays dating market. Just concentrate on escort-game and hedonism in general

Valens , Sluthate.com 32 Comments [1/3/2016 5:13:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 125597

Evolutionary psychology predicts that a man will love a woman he regularly has sex with, who lives with him and that he lives with and will be inclined to look after her welfare, which is not necessarily the same thing as doing what she wants. He will do what he thinks is good for her, and make her do what he thinks is good for her, even if she wants something different. Because one flesh. Taking care of her is taking care of her capacity to bear him children and raise his children.

It does not predict that she will love him all that much, since Gnon wants resources transferred from men to women, and from parents to children, but it does predict that she will obey him, respect him, and physically desire him, in order that he can take care of her and the children they have together.

That is how it supposed to work.

If, however, she is someone else’s wife, or is staying with her family rather the joining with him to form a new family, thus someone else is going to be looking after his kids by her, maybe the state is going to be taking care of her and he is just passing through, then evolutionary psychology predicts romantic love, that he will flatter her and do whatever she wants, no matter how foolish, unreasonable, and self destructive, as Lancelot treated Guinevere.

So, evolutionary psychology predicts that males will primarily experience romantic love in the case of adultery, and to a lesser extent in casual fornication. It predicts that they they will experience the love that a husband bears his wife after they have been living together and having sex for a while. And that women will tend to be at best good wives, rather than in love with their husbands. The wife who craves the seed of a man more alpha than her husband says

“I do not love my husband any more, therefore it is OK for me to service this rock musician and his biker roadies”

but women never love men all that much. They are not supposed to. They are supposed to respect, honor, obey, and desire their husbands.

Thus, the second mention of sexual love in the bible: Rebekah meets Isaac, explains herself. “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death.” The first mention of sexual love in the bible on the other hand has love and romance preceding sex and marriage instead of following sex and marriage – and things go badly wrong.

Romantic love was celebrated by the troubadours, and as depicted by the troubadours, was always adulterous love. King Arthur’s wife Guinevere desired Lancelot, and had sex with him, and Lancelot romantically loved Guinevere, King Arthur’s wife. In consequence Lancelot does lots of stupid humiliating self sacrificing things that prove his enormous burning love, Guinevere acts like an arrogant depraved obnoxious spoiled slut bitch, the fellowship of the Round Table breaks up, Camelot is defeated, and everyone gets killed.

This makes sense for maximizing reproductive fitness. Crazy destructive passion in order to cuckold other men, calm, gentle, firm, nurturing affection for one’s own family. Romance is what the troubadours depicted with alarming accuracy.

Romance is defect/defect equilibrium. Lancelot believes he is sacrificing himself for Guineverein in a Christlike fashion, and the troubadours believed he was sacrificing himself for Guinevere in a Christlike fashion, but in fact he is maximizing his Darwinian genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else. Guinevere also behaves badly to both Lancelot and to her husband King Arthur because she is maximizing her genetic self interest at the expense of everyone else.

Guinevere and King Arthur are in a defect/cooperate relationship. King Arthur is cooperating with Guinevere, by looking after her, and cooperating with Lancelot, in that Lancelot gets benefits as a knight of the fellowship of the Round table, while Lancelot and Guinevere are defecting on King Arthur.

King Arthur, of course, finds out, and Camelot gets defect/defect. Everyone is much worse off, and Camelot falls. That is Romance.

Sexual love is a bad thing except inside the confines of marriage. Men are supposed to have sex first and love later, and women are not really supposed to love men all that much at all. Nowhere in the bible are we told of women loving their husbands, and Guinevere treats both Lancelot and King Arthur very badly. We are, however, fairly frequently told in the bible of women seeking the love of their husbands.

If a woman thinks she is love, she is lying to get some alpha cock. Perhaps lying to herself because all the books she reads and all the movies and television shows she watches tell her that romantic love justifies and purifies every kind of horrible bad behavior. In reality, women are never in love all that much, rather they experience desire for love and sex, which they confuse with love when they proceed to do bad things in pursuit of this desire. Rather than loving a man, a woman desires to be loved by a man. If a man is in romantically in love with a woman whom he is not living with and having regular sex with in his own bed, he is crazy or evil.

What is the Red Pill?

It is the practical and applied knowledge of the Dark Enlightenment, the bad news about how the world really is, and especially and particularly the bad news about the nature of women. The Dark Enlightenment is science and the Red Pill is engineering. There is a certain cynical ruthlessness about the Red Pill. You are told how to use it against other people, and how to protect yourself from other people. Much seemingly virtuous and altruistic behavior, like the behavior of Lancelot towards Guinevere, is revealed to be foolish or, more commonly, wicked and dangerous. Even virtue is reduced to pragmatic self interest – virtue is trying to get into and maintain cooperate/cooperate relationships – as distinct from pretending to virtue in order to get into defect/cooperate relationships. Also, virtue is developing one’s own excellence, as for example lifting iron, or perfecting social skills.

What is the Blue Pill?

It is the official truth about the way the world supposedly works, and particularly and especially the official truth about the nature of women. If women were really the way that the blue pill says they are, then the behaving towards women the way that progressives say you are supposed to behave would work. Unfortunately, the way you are supposed to behave fails, and fails horribly badly with utterly disastrous consequences.

What is the Purple Pill?

It is an attempt to reconcile Red Pill truths with Blue pill morals: “Not All Women are Like That”. It is an attempt to avoid the most grossly self destructive behavior commanded by the Blue Pill, while still accepting that Blue Pill behavior is wise and virtuous behavior, rather than foolish, destructive, self destructive, and evil behavior. It is an attempt to reconcile with reality while remaining virtuous as Blue Pillers see virtue. But Blue Pill “virtues” are like Lancelot’s love for Guinevere: They are evil in themselves, and manifestations of evil. It was wrong for Lancelot to love Guinevere, as much wrong as it was wrong for Guinevere to have sex with Lancelot. Not only is it unwise to be the equal of your wife, it is also wicked. It is your job to supervise and discipline your wife, and some women, not all of them, not most of them, but quite a lot of them, sometimes need to be physical disciplined. You are wicked if you are not prepared to physically discipline your wife and your children in the unfortunate case that the necessity should occur.

What is the Black Pill?

The Black Pill is despair at the sad and cynical truths of the Red Pill, and the belief that we are doomed, that we as individuals shall not know a good sexual and family relationship, that we shall have few or no great grandchildren, that our race shall perish, that our homelands will be flooded by hostile angry sullen low IQ aliens who live on crime, welfare, and voting for the left, who get violent at microaggressions, that our civilization will die, overrun like Detroit and Salisbury by savages incapable of operating civilization.

What is the White Pill?

Deus Vult: That we will be victorious. That those of us that are lucky and strong will create proper families, that we will have love and grandchildren, that we will save our civilization and conquer the enemies of our civilization. That the able will rule over their inferiors, and men will rule over women, as is right for us to do.

Jim, Jim's Blog 18 Comments [3/21/2017 3:18:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125881

(About an agony colunn article in which a mother asks for advice for helping her son, a 32-year-old virgin, deal with his depression)

FHOs are such dumbasses, jesus, the solution is right there between your legs. You used your pussy to bring me into this fucked up world, you could at least use it to relieve me of my subhumanity.

Moms are cunts.

EveryDayIsANightmare, Reddit 12 Comments [3/31/2017 12:25:55 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125933

Women shouldn't be allowed to vote or hold positions of power for one simple reason. Most women make decisions based on EMOTIONS instead of FACT.

As we are now seeing, a government heavily influenced by women will be overrun with bleeding heart social programs (expanding welfare state) even in the wake of much bigger problems (faltering economy).

The FACT is that we don't have the money for these social programs. However, since women have been allowed in to the political world, the EMOTIONAL response allowing these social programs has been HUGE!


unknow, Debate.org 10 Comments [4/2/2017 8:20:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: PETS(People Eating Tasty Sexists)

Quote# 125961

Have you heard of unbiased, peer reviewed academic research?

Take genealogy, history. Take the Bible and the Koran: All over history, men have married 15 year olds, 12 year olds, as the norm. Check anthropology: at what age do women in Hunter-Gatherer societies marry? And what age men do these women prefer? 12 year old boys or over 20 or over 30 year old powerful experienced men?

Then look at Charlie Chaplin. Rock stars in the 1970’s. Hugh Hefner. Men who get admired by adolescent girls.

Then check psychology: Show men the photos or video clips of 15 year old girls, tell them they are 19 (to overcome the ingrained fear of jail bait). See if they are interested or if they find these girls repulsive. You can even check with contraptions that measure penile growth, excitement.

This is how one does science. Your knee jerk reaction can not change past history.

Sadly, through feminist world dominance, feelings like yours did change the history of the last 50 years and of I dont know how many years ahead.

But, as long as it does not become criminalized, a few people like me will insist on telling the truth.

Human Stupidity, Political Correctness (PC), Taboos, Dogmas, Religion make even the Intelligent blind, irrational, "stupid". 7 Comments [4/7/2017 7:18:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 125823

The kind of piglike behavior from women exemplified in this post and in the previous post about the single mom mudshark is only possible when women don’t feel a need to impress their own men; societies that have become quasi-matriarchal and feminist, and consequently overrun with suckup beta males dying of thirst, produce pigwomen in abundance.

I am fond of saying Game can save lives, and it can, but Game has a larger purpose than even the salvation of individual men trapped in the maze of a strange new mating matrix; Game can save whole nations and races from the brink of annihilation. Not kidding, if by Game we mean “men assuming control of their women and their culture”. White men who have rediscovered their balls and ZFG potential are the only force in the known universe that can pull wayward White women back to sanity and femininity. But if the nation continues churning out twisted psychologically and scrotally disfigured manginas like Scalzi, our fate is the abyss.

Single White women want the attention of White men, despite their protestations to the contrary. That will never change. White men therefore have leverage over the political views of single White women. Men can shun libshit women. The shunning will have a chilling effect on other libshit open-borders-and-rapefugee-loving single White women, who fear nothing so much as social exile to the icy wastelands. But it will take courage and ZFG, something in short supply among White men. Game is best viewed, in the bigger picture, as a project to restore that incomparably persuasive alpha attitude which went missing from White men sometime between Iwo Jima and Yo MTV Raps.
Share this:

CH, Chateau Heartiste 5 Comments [3/30/2017 1:47:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126179

"Let's allow women to have political power and to vote. What's the worst that can happen?"

>world politics are now decided by sad pictures



EvropaCrusader, Twitter 9 Comments [4/9/2017 2:50:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 126180

dudes can get raped but they should just live in shame for not being manly enough to prevent there own rape.

fitotrd, Tumblr 8 Comments [4/11/2017 9:05:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 126074

(Submitter's note: Does anyone know how to draw tables here?)

The 1-to-10 scale is used to rate women's physical attractiveness. Tuthmosis states, "I use halves (.5s) to achieve a little more precision. The idea is that a girl who’s almost at that next level—but doesn’t quite have it takes to get the rating outright—will get a .5. I’ll also occasionally grant (or deduct) halves for “intangibles”—things like extraordinary sweetness (or bitchiness), a sexy vibe (or awkwardness), or a personal preference (though I’m quick to disclose the latter)."[1]

Tuthmosis has argued that the scale is pointless because "It seems we have to account for taste after all. . . . Guys rate their own catches high and others' low. Big-ballerism is rampant. . . . Most guys can't extrapolate. . . . Conversely, guys are easily fooled by camera tricks. . . . It's mental masturbation that breeds pointless arguments."[2] General Stalin notes, "Unfortunately, and I hate to say it, the 1-10 scale is difficult in practice. Generally men can agree whether or not a girl is attractive or not, but to get specifics on how attractive, as Tuth said, calls upon a lot of discretion. Using objective and universal characteristics like symmetry, physical fitness, hip-to-waist ratio, hygiene, etc. are decent points to go on, but everyone has a particular level of preference and ego that makes true objectivity impossible. Men have been referencing the 1-10 scale for an awful long time so I don't see it going anywhere and everyone has a general understanding of it. Dispute over specifics is where men just get into a pissing contest."[3]

MrXY writes, "A 7 is a girl I would describe as being 'pretty'. A 6 to me is 'cute' and an 8 is 'beautiful'".[4]

General Stalin writes:[5]

6/10 is average OK looks. Bangable and respectable but nothing to write home to mom about (not that you should be writing letters to your mom about your conquests)

7/10 is sort of perfect "girlfriend" territory. Where the girl is good looking enough to keep you interested in the long term, but not too good looking where she has a crazy ego or you get anxious about having to mate guard when you go out.

8/10 is where a girl is good looking enough to be able to start making money on her looks. Could be a stripper, bartender, IG hoe, fitness chick, etc. These girls are often crazy, especially where they live a fine line between normal and glamorous life style.

9/10 is a stunner. Model good looks. Gets tons of attention everywhere she goes because of her beauty. Can make a good living off of her looks alone. Most women at this level of physical beauty tend to shack up with wealthy/famous men because they can.

10/10 doesn't exists. No one is perfect. The idea of a "10" would be a girl that has something that a 9 has that makes her specifically more attractive per your personal tastes. Maybe you really fucking love gingers and this girl is a 9 who happens to have long red hair and freckles. There is your 10.


Hume's cheat sheet

L D. Hume notes that the appropriate level of investment in a girl?? depends on her rating:[6]
Rating Suitability for
Long term relationship Short term relationship Fuck buddy Booty call One night stand
1-4 No No No No Rarely
5 No No No No Sometimes
6 No No Sure I guess Yes Yes
7 No Yes Yes Yes Yes
8-10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Scale

0

Tuthmosis states, "No Such Thing. Has a dick."

1

Tuthmosis states, "Hideously Unattractive. A monster. Disfigured or irretrievably mutilated. Has two heads, is missing an eye, etc."

2

Tuthmosis states, "Very Unattractive. Disproportionate, morbidly obese."

3

Tuthmosis states, "Unattractive. Ugly, fat, and/or old."

4

Tuthmosis states, "Almost Bangable. But definitely doesn't pass the boner test. Still not good-looking." According to L.D. Hume, girls 4 and lower on the scale are suitable only for one night stands, and even then only when blackout drunk or when one has had sex with fewer than five girls in one's life and is trying to gain experience.

5

Tuthmosis states, "Merely Bangable. Barely passes the boner test. You’d be pretty embarrassed to be seen with her." Hume notes that having sex with such girls is "Almost always a result of excessive, yet not blackout amounts of alcohol. The 'last call at the club' slut coupled with a dry streak."

6

Tuthmosis states, "Almost Cute. She might be cute if one or two things were different, but they’re not. You may not be super-embarrassed to be seen with her, but you certainly wouldn't be proud, and you definitely wouldn't willingly bring her around to anything." Hume describes this as "actually the most dangerous category. The 6s are the most likely to finagle you into a relationship. The sheer number of 6s means you are bound to run into some that have a decent personality, or amazing blowjob skills. Your male hamster will start spinning, thinking about how her tight body overlooks the weird haircut and acne she has. Or how her cute face overrides her baby fat."

7

Tuthmosis states, "Solidly Cute. Zero embarrassment, even some nascent pride in being seen with her. You could bring her to things without looking bad, or losing any of the luster on your game." Hume notes that they are suited for short-term but not long-term relationships:

As to why they are not suited for a long term relationship, the reason is simple—there is just better out there in the world. There are 8s and above. So why, even though she is a cute girl and may have the personality traits to go along with it, settle for a 7? It’s a very very tough thing to advise against and even harder to put in practice. I’ve fallen into the trap myself several times.

The answer of course lies in something that most men have yet to experience. The feeling of dating an 8, which is exponentially better (though admittedly harder to pull off) than a 7. I’ve dabbled in this before and it does make a difference. Try to keep the 7s at bay for the short term relationships and everything below. Instead, use the time you would put LTR’ing a 7 into bettering yourself for the 8.


8

Tuthmosis states, "Hot-Cute. Would be straight-up proud to be seen with her or bring her to things. This is often the sweet spot for long-term relationship material."

9

Tuthmosis states, "Smoking Hot. This is a girl who can easily monetize her beauty. You’re going out of your way to be seen with her."

10

Tuthmosis states, "Perfection. A theoretical abstraction that only exists in the laboratory." Athlone McGinnis agrees.[7] According to Donovan Sharpe, tens don’t get hit on as often, are much more pleasant than you think, are extremely insecure, are so-so in bed, and are people too.[8]

Alternative Scales

philosophical_recovery notes, "The 1-10 as a rating scale will be debated until people stop using it. It's been pointed out before that a much better scale is something more like WNB->WB->WHR->WI, or, Would Not Bang -> Would Bang -> Would Hit Raw -> Would Impregnate".[9]

The late comedian Patrice O'Neal devised a thirty-point scale, with 0-10 being degrees of "ugly looking women", 11-20 being degrees of "alright looking women", and 21-30 being degrees of "beautiful women."[10]

Roosh mentioned both the 1-10 scale and the "binary scale" (with 0 being WNB and 1 being WB) in an early article.[11]

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 12 Comments [4/6/2017 12:43:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125673

Wife has new co-worker and he is a 6,2 CHAD.......I have no chance ......life sucks

I went to her office today to say hi and I was ,et at the door by a 6'2 tan, muscular chiseled faced CHAD.....hell I wished I was gay for a second....this guy was insanely hot.......I caight my wife giggling att his guys jokes,,,,,,I went back to the car, looked in the mirror at my sad rat face and thinning hair and cried........my wife spend HOURS a a day working ALONE with this guy in a private office............The boss is only in the offic in the morning...........maybe I should just give up.......

Fuk, spend all my time avoiding CHAD and now he s working with my fucking wife....

Aigh, Godlike Productions 20 Comments [3/23/2017 4:58:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126156

I can assure you that I'm not a homosexual, because the Bible does not allow for homos to exist in tandem with godly men and women, if there are any godly people left. The Bible plainly says that the vagina isn't godly or good, and women who abuse their flesh and dress like harlots are no better than men who abuse their flesh and are arrogant. I don't understand why anyone praises this liberal organ of Satan.

Elvis is King, FSTDT 12 Comments [4/9/2017 12:18:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126159

It feels so good to hate women

It gives me energy and makes me feel something other than pain and suffering for once. It just feels so fucking good to be a misogynist and I can't exactly explain why.

IFA_MTBL ("Violence against women is fucking hilarious"), /r/incels 10 Comments [4/9/2017 12:20:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126473

The self-improvement meme has to die

It is the biggest normie cope bullshit ever. You can not attract girls with self-improvement. You either attract them by "being yourself" with the looks you were born with or not.

• "Work on your personality bro"
• "Have some confidence"
• "Lift some weights, girls love muscles"
• "Read some books and become smarter"
• "Get some new hobbies"
• "Get an interesting life"
• "Get some new clothes"
• "Get a good degree"
• "Get a good job"
• "Get a nice car"
• "Get a nice house"
• "Take your daily shower"
• "..."
• "After that girls will come from alone, just wait for them bro"

All of that does not matter. Chad or incel. There is nothing else you can improve or fake so you can attract them.. well ofc there is the beta provider cucked way but who wants to go this way tbh ...

Incels need to accept their fate and LDAR with drugs and find enjoyment in porn, games, anime, music and food and then wait for the end of their life.

dontcomplain1, /r/incels 15 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126378

I've always suspected normie fathers of daughters have an incestous infatuation with their daughters due to their sexual desperation which can give rise to all kinds of sick degenerate sexual fantasies. Thus why so many cucks today say they prefer daughters, whereas incels prefer sons just like the guys of old. very common to see mainstream normal fag cucks theses days showering their affections upon their daughters.

Men should never put their daughters on a pedestal. It is downright sexual.

On a side note, you will notice Chad's have very conventional sexual tastes due to having their needs properly fulfilled. For the most part, they don't go for weird crap like poo porn, beastiality and creampies. Normies in denial however, are prone to these deviant sorts of behaviour due to their lack of self confidence, delusionality and projection.

Inceldemographic, /r/incels 11 Comments [4/16/2017 5:00:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125698

Forty years old and getting nowhere in your attempts to bang legal age teenage girls? PUA Deepak ‘Devirginizer’ Wayne will diagnose your problems and put them right so you can be smashing sweet sixteen year old sugar walls before you know it! Of course, Deepak is not exactly without controversy in the PUA community, but one thing you can say is he’s no paedocrite (not that his critics such as the great Krauser PUA are either!).

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 6 Comments [3/24/2017 5:20:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 126576

PSA to all the non incels who come here

Or just anyone here who doesnt identify as ugly, listen very carefully because im about to drop a harsh truth on you

You are SUBHUMAN, you have DISGUSTING genetics, you will NEVER be attractive in any way, if you found your way over to this subreddit or even browse reddit at all, that is definitive proof that you are nothing more than an UGLY LOSER

No attractive person would ever display any of these behavioural patterns, thats a fact, you come here because you have nothing better to do, and you want to feel better about your own miserable life, this is why you're here

I will never understand how so many of these losers can come here and call themselves Chad (This happens constantly), honestly how can one be so deluded?


Vegeta_Da_Prince, Reddit - /r/Incels 14 Comments [4/22/2017 12:20:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125949

"Feminists want Islam because the Burkha eliminates competition from better looking women."

No. That is only a small part of it, and most Muslim countries do not mandate the burkha.

They just crave the treatment of women under Islam. They get gina tingles from it, so it is all driven by the female hindbrain.

Anon, Dalrock 2 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 124958

Admit it women, you only want to be apart of chads harem

They want to be used by chads, they will put up with getting beaten, they would rather be chads cumslut than date a non Chad. This is what they want, they are evil by default. Nothing matters to them beside looks, don't delude yourself. We are dirt to them, I saw a woman crying today and I actually felt a little happy. She was probably crying about the chad who doesn't want to fuck her anymore

iamhopeless256, /r/incels 26 Comments [2/27/2017 11:36:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125390

Women need to stop thinking they have anything of value to say to us

As a gender you are inherently intellectually inferior to the point where you can not really be considered human. How could you possibly think you have some wise advice we, with our human level minds didn't think of? It would be like a 4 year old telling an adult how to do his taxes. You have value in society obviously, but it comes from being sexually attractive, not being smart. Please stick to your strengths. If you want to give us some kind of help then offer your bodies instead of your words.

ban_collector, /r/incels 17 Comments [3/14/2017 11:56:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 118911

Yawn. Just more idiocy.

So you admit you shouldn't have said those things, but they were, even though you yourself admit were wrong and dumb as fuck, supposed to "shake me up"? Hahahah oh wow.

And, no, once again, if your "opinion" is something that has nothing to do with anything I ever stated, then it's not an opinion. It really isn't that hard. I mean, it is to you since you're mentally retarded. but it shouldn't be to anybody with an IQ above 20.

>So why cant others so the same, even if its directed at you?

BECAUSE MY OPINIONS DON'T BREAK THE RULES. YOURS DO, AS THEY'RE ABOUT ATTACKING ME WITH INCORRECT CLAIMS ABOUT SHIT I MOSTLY EXPLAINED BY 2013, YOU TOOL.

>if someone says they dont think your very smart based on what you say, you can disagree but accept its their opinion.

Not why you were banned, you lunatic. Keep playing the victim.

>but I think someone should have sat down with you when you were much much younger and taught you a bit about women and relationships

**HAHAHAHA MY PARENTS, WHO DIDN'T GROW UP IN A FEMINIST SOCIETY, WERE SUPPOSED TO TEACH A 12 YEAR-OLD ME TO SHOOT A GIRL OF THE SAME AGE IN THE HEAD- HAHAHAHAHA**

>but its like you turned your sub into your own safe space.

I have protected it from insane monsters like you and will continue doing so. This is by no means a safe space, as people are disagreeing with us every day. It's just not allowing crazy fucks like you in.

>your mind on women or racism I think it would make you a lot happier.

Of course. Being as delusional and stupid as you would make me somewhat happier. So would heroin. The same deal. You're selling snake oil, pal. Dangerous, cancerous snake oil.

And see how he uses the term "racism", and that's wrong, while supporting blacks killing everybody white in the world oh wow.

And, once again, go fuck yourself.

caamib, r/worstof 23 Comments [5/13/2016 3:18:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 27434

God had made Adam first and made all the best detailed creation/making for a man..

Aftewards, He created and made Eve, the best detailed creation/making for a woman.

In another words, they are both important to God.

But in responsibility, Adam was created first to be responsible for everything and be a husband.
Eve was created later to submit to her husband.

samuraij, Christian Forums 31 Comments [7/21/2007 7:55:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125392

2nd question: why are you a misandrist?



Because men continue to perpetrate violence against me in both a personal and systemic way that makes it difficult for me to trust men by default. Not impossible, but difficult.



I could say NotAllMen, but that doesn’t seem like it’ll affect someone like you. I sympathize if you’ve had bad experiences with men in your life, but to jump the gun all the way to misandry is not only extreme and radical, it’s a dangerous way of thinking. It’s judging the many based on the few, so your misandry is already poisoned by subjective bias.




It is self protection that harms no one. Distrusting men keeps me WAY more safe than openly trusting men does.
My distrust of men doesn’t harm them, but it keeps me safer. Yet people want to wax theoretical about it.
I know misandrists. People who have been hurt. Not once, not twice, but over a lifetime and in a manner that impacts on their ability to simply exist in their day to day lives.
Yet almost all misandrists I know have some men who are friends, they love their family and they actively support men who are victims of rape.
Trusting men, ESPECIALLY cishet white men is a painful process that often involves me having to be continually hurt in order to educate and set up my own boundaries.
Misandry isn’t jumping the gun, it’s putting your feet into the starting block and being ready for the shot you know will come.

GeekandMisandry, tumblr 2 Comments [3/14/2017 10:12:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 125497

[On a screenshot of a radfem post calling people male supremacists for supporting fathers and mothers having equal parental rights]

This is further evidence that gender and women studies are pseudoscience and their top theories "the patriarchy", "wage gap" and "rape culture" are conspiracy theories. They not only double down but they triple down with their insanity. They should see a couple of wildlife documentaries and draw analogies which easily disproves the above claims (except for the last one).

It's ridiculous that this is taught at universities and has a major presence both in media and politics as if it had any factual merit.

Liberals against SJW's, Facebook 5 Comments [3/18/2017 2:52:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125457

The masculine American male is a dying breed. We have been told for far too long that violence is never the answer. We've been told that it's cruel to kill our own food. We've been conditioned to believe that there is no place in modern society for the man who refuses to shave his chest or wear skinny jeans. As a man...you are a protector. As a man...you are a provider. As a man...you are solely responsible for the safety and well being of your family. How can you be a good husband if you can't defend your wife? How can you be a good father if you can't protect your children? Remember...the eyes of the children are fixed upon you. You serve as an example of what young men should grow up to be...and of what young women should seek out in a partner. So...grow your beard, wear your boots, eat your steak, carry a knife, own a gun, protect your woman, fight for what is right and just. Be strong. Be of good courage. Long live the masculine American male.

Join our private group of masculine men: https://www.facebook.com/groups/liquorgunsbaconandtits/

Liquorgunsbaconandtits, Facebook 30 Comments [3/16/2017 8:39:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 125821

[From “Human Rights” Kikes Scream as Putin Decriminalizes Slapping Hoes, Bitches]

Just as it is axiomatic that Jews belong in the oven, so is it that women deserve to be slapped.

Women are at a physical disadvantage to men, so their evolved field-leveler is the ability to emotionally abuse men manipulating and berating him. When you remove the ability of a man to lay down the law in response to emotional abuse by women with the back of his hand, you create a situation where women have total dominance over men.

We have all seen women on rampages. What they want in that situation – what is required – is physical discipline. This is how healthy families work – women who won’t shut their mouths get their mouths shut for them.

The Jewish system has told us that it is “wrong” to hit a woman, but has never made any comment on the ways women jab and poke at men. It is a recipe for matriarchy, and I’m very happy to see Putin clearing out this bit of liberal nonsense.

Same week he banned a top porno website too, showing that Putin deeply cares about the mental and emotional health of Russian men.

@CNN:
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law that decriminalizes some forms of domestic violence, according to state-run news agency Tass.

[...]

A member of the Russian Duma Vitaly Milonov, who supported the law, told CNN: I don’t think that we should violate the rights of family and sometimes a man and a woman, wife and husband, have a conflict.

[...]

“Frankly speaking what we call home violence is not home violence — it’s sort of a new picture of family relations created by liberal media.”


Bingo.

The (((liberal media))) at it again.

Sometimes you have conflict, sometimes you have to slap a bitch.

It’s not “abuse,” it’s just a fact of life.

Human Rights Watch had urged parliament to reject the law, calling it “dangerous and incompatible with Russia’s international human rights obligations.”

[...]


[Citation needed]
I would personally never actually harm a woman physically, and I don’t support it. However, simply slapping a woman is not harm, and it is usually necessary.

Who runs this “Human Rights Watch” anyway?

Oh, right.

Kenneth Roth.

He’s only concerned about the well-being of little goyim girlies, I’m sure.

If you believe that, I got a pair of tickets to Hamilton I wanna sell ya.

Andrew Anglin, Daily Stormer 16 Comments [3/29/2017 1:44:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 125762

Young FHO logic in full display. I think you guys are right

We are in class discussing the chapter we were supposed to read. In the chapter it says women like dark triad personalities. Someone brings this up and it was as if they spit in the face of every female. Countless "i dont go for that" or "i hate those types" from ALL of them this includes the regulars the snowflakes the sororities. Despite what the book says and what they professor says they refuse to reason.

The best part of this is they then proceed to say all guys care about sex as the number thing. U would think they were just exaggerating but the majority said no they were 100% serious they think all men purely want sex first and foremost. Wonder what personality is like that?

0l__l0, /r/incels 10 Comments [3/27/2017 12:41:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126402

Hey non-incels: The concepts of leagues/looksmatch/lowering your standards are incompatible with the concept of romantic love

And I guarantee just about all of your turds believe in it.

I mean, how deep can this supposed "romantic love" be if people only qualify for each other based on the very thing that is most superficial and supposed to matter the least...one's appearance?

I thought "love was blind," idiots?
I thought "looks fade," idiots?

How can you possibly believe in that garbage, but then talk about how "'average' men can still get in relationships if they lower their staaaaaaaan-darrrrrrrds?"

I mean, if this mythical "romantic love" existed, why wouldn't incels and supermodels "fall in love with each other?" After all, there's no reason to separate people into different leagues on the basis of something as shallow as looks, now, is there?

TimRattayGotScrewed, /r/incels 11 Comments [4/17/2017 9:52:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126034

I wasn't triggered 3 years ago

I was at the beach with my parents and I began exploring it. I stumbled up a couple behind some rocks making out and touching each others parts. The girl was topless and she was taller than the guy.

I didn't give a shit about it because I was 18 at the time and I believed that I would get a girlfriend sooner or later. How wrong I was. I was naive and stupid to have such a silly hope. If I experienced this scene now I would beat the shit out both of them for being degenerate and indulging in sexual acts in front of me.


thegambler953, /r/incels 11 Comments [4/5/2017 12:12:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126072

A pump-and-dump is the term for a "one night stand" from a masculine perspective; that is, quickly meeting then having sex with a girl followed by breaking contact with her without remorse. Slutty women are sometimes referred to as "pump-and-dump material". In the manosphere, the pump-and-dump is controversial because men naturally want woman to have sex with them easily but at the same time cannot respect a woman who gives up sex with next to no commitment.

It is advisable to take precautions when planning for sex with pump and dumps, including but not limited to, ensuring contact information is not exchanged and/or she does not know your last name since the risk of a false rape accusatibon is increased.

Woman who have been pumped and dumped on multiple occasions begin to take on characteristics of Thousand cock stare. More pump and dumps tend to wear heavily on the female psyche and instances of it are generally kept secret from her friends.

A pump-and-dump is nothing more than a one-time answer to a physical necessity, requiring no maintenance and a very low investment of time. It is the lowest rank of "relationship", lower even than fuck buddy.[1]

Variants
Smash-and-dash
Hit it-and-quit it
Fuck-and-chuck
Nail-and-bail
Bash-and-dash

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 4 Comments [4/6/2017 12:42:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126042

In Eastern Europe I don’t get the achingly painful sense of regret at seeing a pretty 14 year old girl and thinking that by the time she is legal, she will already be losing her youthful charm and beauty. The fact is, in the UK, and even in countries such as France and Germany, the majority of girls are burnt out, bitter, overweight slags by the time they reach 18. Because of diet, lifestyle, and genetics, even pretty 14 year olds do start to lose it by the time they are off to university. In Eastern Europe, puberty arrives a little later, lasts longer, and everywhere you turn there are 20 year old women who are ravishingly beautiful, have perfect skin, possess the long slim legs of ballerinas, and who wear elegant fashions with a graceful air

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 7 Comments [4/5/2017 1:04:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: jim beam

Quote# 125264

(OP by FloridaTulpamancer)
Do You Think There Will Ever be an "Ugly Culture?"

The deaf community has some of them who have created "Deaf Culture." They think being deaf is a good thing. There's already a political party in Japan based around being ugly. Is it possible that there will one day be a subculture grown out of ugly people? (Maybe one that doesn't discriminate on looks or celebrate Valentine's or whatever.)

(AllahWilling)
Already exists. The vidya culture consists of subhuman faggots. It was destined.

(NewLoadsOfFun)
That is slowly being invaded by women who want attention from all the men there

(Societys_Claws)
And the result is this

[Link removed]

What was great turns into a steaming pile of shit. And the subhuman faggots move on to something that's still good.

Various incels, /r/incels 20 Comments [3/9/2017 6:04:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126163

Males have made a bigger impact as a species

DISCLAIMER!!: I am not trying to sound like some woman hater, I am just saying this because I feel it's necessary to say :)

this has been on my chest for quite a while. I normally never thought about i, but after seeing how much our world has been tainted by feminism and what it has done to all of us. I am just going to say it. Men have made more of an impact on this planet than females ever had, yet they act like they have.

Hunter-Gatherer, Computers, Printer Press, Compass, Mona Lisa, Colossus of Rhodes, Pyramids of Ghiza, The Phone, The Car, Lightbulb, Penicillin, Internet

Yet, I am somehow a woman-hater for being happy that we did this. No No NO! men can't even say that we made such an impact because it will hurt the feelings of others, even though IT'S A FACT!

Men are humble about it too! They are like, "Yeah, so what" Feminists/Females will create some reusable candle and act like it is the second coming of Christ. Like dude, no pls.

(Emphasis original)

_Panini, /r/incels 7 Comments [4/9/2017 12:24:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126252

(I couldn't find a link to the original post, but I couldn't resist posting this to SSDT)


I think there is a very simple solution to the ‘problem’ of the team sport of gang-raping that is so popular as a form of gay male bonding between football players. Mandatory castration of all men who play football and all men who watch football. This would be a quick and easy solution. The violent, woman-hating ‘sport’ will disappear overnight and women will be a little bit safer in this fucked up and dangerous world, full of fucked up and seriously dangerous men.

Allecto, Wordpress 10 Comments [4/11/2017 10:29:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125734

(David Futrelle is a feminist blogger, in case anyone doesn't know)

David you are a gamma male, worse than an omega or beta. Not only do you have a female mindset, your kind embody the unflattering, backstabbing, evil, ruthless, greedy, cowardly, stubborn and manipulative qualities of women. Where they have Cleopatra you betas have Gamma Males like yourself. Pol Pot, Joseph Stalin, Khrushchev, Mao, Lenin, Robespierre, Hitler, Trotsky, Hugo Chavez,. You are the scum of this planet, in the last century your kind murdered over 100 million people on the planet, you created communism and this mess of cultural marxism today.

You can’t get laid so you channel your energy to focus on other sad activities. Women scorn you because you mirror back a woman‘s most unflattering traits, and no woman even wants you to be her beta because she knows if you had her child you would likely sell them to slavery on the black market or take them to somewhere they have a high probability of dying in. Sad you will not succeed.

Why don’t you meet Roosh V in real life and see who has more confidence instead of passive-aggressively making jabs at him gamma male coward?



RedPillGuard, We Hunted The mammoth 12 Comments [3/25/2017 11:17:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 125397

Testosterone levels have been plummeting in Western men for at least two generations and this fact is without question. I will speculate in this post what a multigenerational, age-independent decline in T will portend for American society, should the trend not shortly reverse itself.

women will dress and act sluttier to capture the attention of increasingly benumbed men who need the services of the hardest of hardcore porn to feel aroused.
team sports will disappear.
drama club will be a required class.
politics will intensify its shift leftward because low T men will vote more like women.
the national (and psychological) borders protecting the low T men from predation will remain, for all practical purposes, open to the sewer world until, inevitably, higher T conquerors arrive in sufficient number to wipe out the low T White submissivists.
inventiveness and entrepreneurship will stagnate, and contract.
any big job or goal will demand more oversight, more paper pushing, more regulatory hurdles to overcome. the days when men gathered and made shit happen on a reasonable time frame will be over. it’ll be an HR dystopia of endless meetings all the way down to the musty cellar of the gossip mill.
corporations will turn into ghettos of bickering crones, slutty college girls, and yes-manlets. nothing will be produced but social media apps and articles about online dating. the resulting economic collapse will create a run on arable urban land as millions of useless SWPLs fight to the death for patches of communal gardens to plant their sad kale and heirloom tomatoes.
therapy and self-medication will shoot through the roof.
heart disease, cancer, and obesity will rise again (or continue the general upwards rise) among men.
the rate of infidelity will increase.
the rate of divorce will hold steady or increase (we may have hit the divorce industrial complex saturation point).
marriage will increasingly be platforms for brides to take selfies and grooms to blubber during the vows. jerkboy best men will be tasked with the job of deflowering any virgin brides remaining in the wilds as the soyfatted grooms recite lines from their favorite feminist poets.
fertility will continue declining.
the rate of cuckoldry will increase.
cat ownership will increase among men.
muscle cars will become a distant relic.
there will be vanishingly little entertainment made with a straight male sensibility in mind.
weird sexual paraphilias and fetishes will rise (those afflicted with declining libido will compensate with outlandish substitutes to bring back that lovin’ feeling).
the prevalence of sexual dysfunctions will increase.
feminism will get increasingly shrill, and male feminists increasingly servile and pathetic.
the population of basement bachelors, cat ladies and bitter spinsters will explode.
sexbots will be the only romantic companionship for half the population.
high libido men — cads — will reign supreme in the actual sexual market (what’s left of it) as opposed to the pretend sexual market that lonely feminists jabber about during their intersectionality bullshit sessions.
androgyny will become the norm.
polyandry will be common.
polygyny will be rare, but more entrenched. (the few high T men who aren’t eunuchs will have no trouble keeping de facto harems of smitten lovers satisfied and compliant)
balls, penises, jawlines, chins, noses, and musculature will literally shrink in men. ears may become floppy.
a million sociologists with shitty research papers no one has any intention of replicating will claim that beta male orbiters are our strength. they will write of the virtues of polygamy and the matriarchy, as their civilization burns down around them.
no one will ever again speak anything close to the truth about the world, about the sexes, about the races. equalist self-delusion will be taught in schools under the subject “everything but math”.
math will succumb soon afterward.
art will suck. music will suck. architecture will suck. literature will suck. this will continue a trend long evident. houellebecq may very well be our last great author.
tissue boxes will be handed out in movie theaters so that the 70-30 male-female audience may dab their eyes sitting through a full line-up of sappy rom-coms.
Mars? Uh, no. More like, the space program will be dead and the androgynes of the future will come to remember the moon landing as a myth promulgated by ancient hirsute men imprisoned in a strictly binary sexuality, who possessed a vestigial feature called a “jawline” and squinted a lot.
infrastructure will continue crumbling. instead of doing something about it, everyone will wait for the next tragedy when a bridge fails and then participate in a candlelight vigil and cry a lot. they will repeat this process until everyone is dead from preventable tragedies.
John Scalzi will be Premier of this Empire of Aromatase. His rule will not last long. Muslims, blacks, and black Muslims will overrun the Femme West and every capital will ring out with the dulcet ululations of muhammed’s flock.

Recall the Law of Gender Conservation:

?Masculinity = ?Femininity

Or, ?T = ?E, for short.

Nature abhors a testosterone vacuum. If one tribe’s men has low T, the fapuum will be filled with (in no particular order or likelihood of emergence):

invader men who have higher T
aggrocunts of man-jaw and boy-hip who have lower E (to align with the lower T of their men)
intratribe men with high T who somehow evolved an immunity against the low T disease.

Option one is genocide. Not fun.
Option two is bed death. Not fun.
Option three is our best bet for saving the West. Society will rebound as Nature, in her infinite wisdom, entrusts the low T landscape to high T spermlords who, despite feminists’ faux abhorrence to the contrary, will piledrive a wide swath through a lot of parched pussy that has spent decades lost in an anhedonic wilderness of un-men.

But if we don’t get our borders under control and stop seeding our water supply with endocrine-disrupting chemsexicals, Option Three will never have a chance to pass.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 22 Comments [3/14/2017 10:19:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125732

can't have boobs be a babies meal and benefit from them also being used/presented as sexual objects. Cover up unless in private, everyone's husbands and sons are not viewing that as nature!!! Have some modesty at some point in this downward spiralling society. Cleavage is out of control....why wear clothes at all....?

Jody Vineyard, Facebook 10 Comments [3/25/2017 11:17:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 112550

Plain and simple. She broke her promise. Now, she's lying about it and trying to play the victim. Like many others, she values what man thinks way more than what God thinks. Instead of advocating for chastity, now she's advocating for promiscuity. She appears to be no different than the other scantily-clad bimbos in the entertainment industry.

SupermanHere, The Christian Post 10 Comments [9/5/2015 5:38:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125610

One of the things I love about President Trump is the fact that Melania Trump is quiet, keeps to herself and isn't trying to force her way into making public policy.

It's a refreshing change from eight years of Michael Obama (not a typo).

Quiet, submissive wives for the win.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/6325100]

...

Now if President Trump can just tell his thot daughter Ivanka and her Jewboy husband to go pound sand, things would be perfect.

The two of them are squishes who want to compromise with the cucks and the lefties. They gotta go.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/6325135]

Matt Forney, Gab 10 Comments [3/21/2017 3:23:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125454

It's almost like sex is a myth

We've all been living our lives in the hopes of some action, hearing about all of our friends exploits, reading about sexual acts that make the news, lending a shoulder whilst girls tell is about their tragic pump'n'dump by Chad.

But we've never seen it, never felt it, never had any tangible evidence that it even happens.

An existence as an incel is so far away from the typical human existence, I'm placed in utter shock every time i think about it.

tiajlmao, /r/incels 19 Comments [3/16/2017 8:37:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125484

A few murmurs of dissent rose at the 15th All World Dawoodi Bohra Conference in Udaipur as the topic of validity of the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) or khatna came up on Sunday.

A voice of dissent against the ban came from Gazanfer Okasa, the general secretary of the Bohra Youth Association. “Khatna shouldn’t be linked to FGM,” said Okasa, refering to the Grade 2, 3 and 4 level female genital mutilation practised in African countries, which could involve total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora. “In our community, we cut a little part, unlike in African countries. Though my sister, who is a doctor, and my mother strictly condemn this practice, I am in favour of khatna because I believe it is a part of our Sharia.”

The Bohra community, a sub-sect of Ismaili Shia Islam, remove the prepuce from the genitalia of girls before puberty.

Gazanfer Okasa, 15th All World Dawoodi Bohra Conference 6 Comments [3/18/2017 2:50:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Hu's On First

Quote# 126595

WOMAN: The female human. For many generations has been inferior to its male counterparts. However, there is a reason for this. Men have been proven to physically, emotionally and intellectually outperform women. Want proof? Well the vast majority of the history's great artists, musician, athletes, inventors and intellectuals have been men.

canadiancon, Urban Dictionary 31 Comments [4/23/2017 12:20:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126682

You know that Germany just recently (I believe it was yesterday) has pass a criminal NAZI law that ban any marriage under the age of 18? literally you are unabled to marry a 17-year-old is the last insult of that aberration called Federal Germany literally leaded by an old hag and a parliament of manginas.

A country of weak and feminist democrats where you could already be imprisoned for having relationships with 15-years-old if they (some femihag judges) are considered her “immature”, 40 years ago if you said that a girl of 15 was a “child” would have laughed in your face. While the real perverts (you know what I mean) walk unpunished.

As long as man is submissive to women and to the feminist-modernist-democratic system, the decent and good men, can expect nothing of this life, neither in the social or sexual ladder. Nor the young girls can expect anything valuable in their best years of life.

Willhem, Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 10 Comments [4/26/2017 12:44:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 125583



WHAM, break down.
Happy well adjusted normal girls do not give themselves a desexing crew cut.
This was professionally shot and take a good long look at how broken her eyes still managed to look



A few years later and she is exploring bestiality

Cataline Sergius, The Dark Herald 8 Comments [3/21/2017 2:24:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 124095

Stop

You desperate beta orbiters are the problem. You fucking like all these 2/10 in the looks department whales pictures and comment "beautiful" and make them feel like queens. This makes them think they are above you. You're only reinforcing what society tells them, you're making this incel epidemic worse. We see all these women who claim they're "ugly" but they don't think that. You want to know why? Because they have been showered with compliments by you guys their whole life. Stop giving them attention, stop lying to them and less women will think they're all that.

iamhopeless256, /r/incels 18 Comments [1/31/2017 2:38:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 123405

(talking about a news report in which a suspended policeman is charged with reading erotic stories involving underage girls)

Does the article say anything about how old the "children" (girls?) in the stories the guy read were? I mean, the story is simply sickening even if they were newborns, given that these are just effin stories, but it would be even more infuriating if they were like 15-18. That would just be one of the craziest, sickening and most hateful things I've ever seen, maybe even the most sickening one.

I remember using SMS flert services back in mid 2000s. At least several times I've ran into 14 or 15 year-old girls who were very, very sexually active. One openly bragged about having a "fuck buddy" while being an eight grader and wanted to meet me as well. Of course, things have changed a lot since then here and become a lot more hateful as well.

caamib, Eivind Berge's Blog 31 Comments [1/2/2017 4:53:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125907

LOL I learned something the other day you might find interesting. In the original stories, Helen of Troy, “The most beautiful woman in all of Greece”, was only about 10 years old. I imagine she was supposed to look something like Miette from The City Of Lost Children.

Fronk, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 7 Comments [4/1/2017 11:37:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 125952

Women have no ambition

Women's life goals:

(A) be Instagram famous

(B) have a Chad boyfriend to take photos with in Bali, Paris and Ibiza

(C) short internship or job that produces nothing of value (which she will also quit after 3 months after finding a sugar daddy and blaming it on being "burned out from work") in a comfortable air conditioned office in some company with a flashy name like EY partners (flashy like their handbag brands) so she can brag about her "Career" and wear sexy office clothes everyday (boss only hired her because she is hot)

yup, that is all!

Inceldemographic, /r/incels 17 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Sour Grapes Award

Behold the dread harem of strawwomen!

Quote# 125970

List of things normie males pretend to be OK with:

• Her storied sexual past which includes a double digit partner count, orgies, and other forms of sheer degeneracy, with men better endowed/better looking than himself (Chads)

• The fact that she did anal/deep throating/MFF threesomes for Chad but never will for him, since she has "grown out of it" now

• The fact that her prime sexual years are behind her and that she is "too busy" or "too tired" for sex pretty much all the time now

• Her telling him she's too tired for sex or has a headache for the 7th time that week

• Her browsing FB, keeping tabs on old flames and having private messages with ex boyfriends, male colleagues and bosses that he will never be privy to (for good reason)

• Her ladies' nights out with her BFFs where she doesn't text or call for long periods

• Her insistence that trust is essential, and that she should be able to go out and have drinks with male friends/coworkers, party all night, sleep at friends houses, all without ever being questioned

• The fact that she constantly complains about not having enough money, pressures him to "self improve" by getting a better job so she can buy the things she wants

• Her pushing him to spend more time looking after the kids, cleaning up the house, giving her emotional care, and other shit she would never think to pester Chad for

• Her interest in the polyamorous lifestyle

• Her "feminist awakening" where she realized she needed to be "sexually liberated" and draw "energy and validation" from the attentions and cocks of strange men

• The knowledge that divorce (which seems more certain by the day) will financially and socially ruin him while benefitting her

• The fact that at least one of their children doesn't really resemble him much

Sure, we may be incel, but at least we will never have to live with all the rationalizations and bullshit a non Chadly male has to endure in order to maintain a relationship with an FHO in this day and age. Can the pro-feminist beta male cucks who come here to complain say the same? Thought not. LOL game over normshits, you lose again!

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 16 Comments [4/3/2017 12:05:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126010

The vagina is a liberal organ of Satan, present in all females after the fall of man, that exists to seduce unwittingly stupid men into vile abominations unto the Lord. However, in Western culture, this evil organ is somehow given godlike status and has prompted numerous individuals into hysteria regarding the exalted status of this filthy demonic body part. Matthew 7:18 says "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit." It is objectively verifiable that since this corrupt organ does evil while sinners think that it does good, the evil fruits are what it produces.
Liberals like to think that society should talk more positively about this disgrace to God's kingdom, citing the justification that the entire body is wonderful, and righteousness and self control are obsolete. Romans 12:1 clearly says that "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service." Therefore, highlighting and focusing on the worst part of anatomy is not what God intended.
"And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons." Genesis 3:7 notes the shame that this nasty part brought Eve, and that it needed to be covered up. If liberals were correct in their assessment that it was natural and not shameful, there would be absolutely no reason to cover it up. Liberal logic fails once more.
This evil thing can be used as an instrument of coercion, leading people to Hell. Numerous men were sent to Hell after this evil organ was used by the evil succubus Taylor Swift who possessed many men into a lustful trance, and since they all rejected the Lord Jesus Christ, they fell deeper and deeper until the succubus found the next victim. Satan formed Swift into such a way, having perfectly circular and perky breasts to trick unwittingly stupid men into engaging in utter depravity with the utmost evil organ of shame and sin.

Elvis is King, Conservatism Wiki 17 Comments [4/5/2017 12:05:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125966

My Evolution: From Woman Lover to Full Misogynist

When I first came here I was a sex obsessed virgin that liked 90% of the women he saw. I rated girls 10/10 and appreaciated their bodies while talking about their beauty.

At one point, I decided to become a Normie. I quitted Reddit and attemted to socialize but to no avail.

Last week, I used emotional blackmailing to force a girl into asking me out. After talking with her I had first person taste of female privileges and their freedom. I got really pissed with the conversation and left after 1 hour.

With new found hatred, I made my way back here. I can't help but hate women for having sexual and social power beyond my imagination. They were given this power, abused it and became corrupted turning into degenerate sluts in the process. How can I appreaciate females when they would never appreaciate me?

thegambler953, /r/incels 6 Comments [4/3/2017 12:05:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Love Is An RPG Award

My To-Hit-On Roll yielded a Natural One. Again.

Quote# 125845

Personality matters ONLY if your looks are less than 1.5 points different from other guys AND you are at least a 5

You are only able to compete using personality if your competitor is less than 1.5 points apart from you. If you are a 4 you can still get the ocassional date but any guy 0.5 points higher will steal you the girl or get her in the first place.

At 1.5+ points of difference in looks, personality of both guys stop mattering because the aesthetic difference overrides any personality difference.

So, one guy is a 5 and other is a 6, but the 5 has a great personality and the 6 is a boring fuck, the 6 lost. But if its a 5 vs a 7, the 7 automatically wins no matter the personality.

Zyrros, /r/incels 16 Comments [3/30/2017 4:12:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125329



(Next page)


unknow, shareslide.net 23 Comments [3/12/2017 2:10:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125411

Missing the point

Some of you are missing the Point. Sure it is possible to lose your virginity after 21 or even get into a relationship. But if you are doing it with an average female the chances of a equitable relationship are zero.

Let's say you 23 and never dated. Your girl is also 23 and has lead a normal existence. Not even slutting it up she would have double digit sex partners assuming she's lost her virginity at 17 and only had two partner she per year.

So you get in a relationship with her and she has all these experiences and you have none. Are you going to lie about it or tell the truth? She can probably tell anyway so you might as well tell the truth. But now she knows you're a loser- there IS A REASON YOU HAVENT HAD SEX BY 21.

Remember that the person who cares less in a relationship has the most power. If I have options I care less. That's the entire point. If I'm a girl with 50 guys in my phone who I could hit up at any time- why would I put up with any shit from a virgin? The only way that relationship works is if the virgin falls in line completely. This is how beta bucks are crafted and is the entire point of the post and this sub in general imho.

I think there should be a dramatic shift from trying to escape inceldom twords embracing it and becoming MGTOW.

Deane_, /r/incels 17 Comments [3/15/2017 7:53:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126199

[Comment under "Normie fathers of daughters are pathetic"]

To all fathers who have daughters: understand that all females are filthy whores from birth, including your daughter. Your daughter wants to be plowed by Chad from the moment she learns about sex. She is a fucking degenerate and no amount of protection will keep her from being a degenerate. She was born one.

CheesyFedora, Reddit - r/Incels 11 Comments [4/11/2017 9:07:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 126282

Nope, totally helpless is good. Men say “I love you”, women say “I need you”.

“Take some deep breaths and walk around for a while, then please try to explain why you are so upset by women using tools around the home.”

You want my personal motivation? Buckle up. I live in a society where women are so safe and provided for, they have zero need for unsexy men like me. Guess what? If Barbie doesn’t need me then she doesn’t want me. She marries Welfare and rides the carousel until the Wall hits and leaves her a burned-out waste of a human soul, while I starve for sex and get treated by society like a drone.

I lose. She loses. My country burns.

Does it bother you that I want to spook women into good behavior? To push their faces in the facts of how much that fish needs a bicycle? To sabotage their ability to survive without a man around? I want to do it because it works. The Democrats have been scaring women into obedience for decades with great success. Even Christ did no less when He repeatedly warned us of Hell. Women are creatures of fear. Fear motivates women in healthy directions. Taking away her fear is like taking away a man’s courage. The result is loathsome, unmotivated androgyny.

I live in Androgyny, USA. The men are allowed little chance to strive & succeed, or even trade friendly punches, eventually slouching into parodies of masculinity such as lumbersexuals. The women fear nothing and therefore stop exerting themselves, inflating like pool toys, their minds devolving to a level of stimulus-response that would shame a worm. How did we get here? Safety first! Barbie must always be safe!

Either we frighten women into marrying early and young, ripping away every “I don’t need no man” crutch possible, and in the process giving men the chance to be heroes, or the West will continue its decline into a matriarchal slum of men checked out on video games and women checked out on social media. Neither wanting to live in this Brave New World of safe spaces.

That’s why I don’t want Barbie to feel safe, to be competent in my absence. She is a woman and therefore, the price of respecting a Beta like me is living in a constant state of mild fear to which I am the answer. So be it. I will be her hero and she will be my cheerleader with benefits. I can rent domestic servants. I can’t rent admiration and respect.

That is Christ’s own attitude, right there. He doesn’t want us because we’re useful. He wants us because we’re grateful.

Thank you, that needed saying.

Gunner Q, Dalrock 13 Comments [4/13/2017 1:53:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125665

On Tuesday, the Oklahoma House met to discuss engrossment of its controversial House Bill-1549, which would prohibit anyone from seeking an abortion in the case of a genetic abnormality.

Oklahoma State Rep. Cory Williams (D) asked Rep. George Faught — who authored the bill — if rape is the “will of God.”

“Well, you know, if you read the Bible, there’s actually a couple circumstances where that happened,” Faught began. “The Lord uses all circumstances. I mean, you can go down that path, but it’s a reality unfortunately,” he said.

Williams followed up, asking if incest is the “will of God.”

“Same answer. Doesn’t deal with this bill,” Faught said. Williams argued that the questions matter to the legislation, given that Faught was unwilling to make exceptions in the case of rape or incest. “You are proffering a divine intervention as the reason why you won’t do that and so I think it is very important.”

“This body wants to know — and myself personally — whether you believe rape and incest are actually the will of God,” Williams questioned.

“It’s a great question to ask,” said Faught. “And, obviously if it happens in someone’s life, it may not be the best thing that ever happened, but — so you’re saying that God is not sovereign with every activity that happens in someone’s life and can’t use anything and everything in someone’s life and I disagree with that.”

George Faught, Raw Story 11 Comments [3/23/2017 2:07:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126037

Women are sexually fluid

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/1180409/this-is-the-fascinating-reason-women-have-evolved-to-become-bisexual/

Females do not have a sexual orientation. They just have sex with whoever turns them on wether he is a man, a woman, a shemale or whatever. They are not necessarily attracted to either men or women. They do not specifically crave a penis or a vagina. They just go with whatever gets them wet at the moment.

thegambler953, /r/incels 11 Comments [4/5/2017 12:12:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 22845

Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

Jesus is plainly saying that if a man looks at a woman and lusts after her, he has committed adultery with her already. One of the definitions of 'with' is: So as to be touching or joined to. The clear point is that Jesus is saying they are both guilty of adultery. The reason for the man's guilt is obvious. The woman's guilt is not as clear. She has set a trap for him - she has enticed him.

[snip]

Now, the sad thing is: the average, seemingly moral high school girl is more revealing in her attire than the harlot of Proverbs 7. Even more sad is the fact that these girls are causing men around them to commit adultery with them by the way they dress.

Bro. Randy, T4C 55 Comments [3/31/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125642

I passed by a group of Spanish teenage schoolgirls the other day. Normally when I pass by a group of such teens, whether German, Italian, Russian, French, hell even British, the girls – especially the pretty ones – will brush their hair with their hands as I walk past, expecting and hoping that I look at them. Every one of these Spanish girls gave me the ultra creep shaming look immediately I glanced in their direction. They looked about 16 too.

The only other country’s teens that I get almost guaranteed creep shamings from is the Dutch. It’s interesting that both those countries only a relatively short while ago had the most liberal (sane) laws and attitudes towards attraction to teenage girls, and both have been pressured into very rapidly adjusting their norms and laws into line with the likes of Britain and the USA. The Netherlands is now probably the most paedohysteric nation on Earth. All these Stinson Hunter type anti-paedo vigilante groups running amok in the UK are nothing as compared to what they’re like in Holland.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 12 Comments [3/22/2017 12:55:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 125628

They want you to buy into the scam feminism and liberals have set up. So society can crash and be rebuilt up better the way they want it. Although a lot are just idiots who think anything goes will last forever. Neither of which will ever work out. Most dumb fuck liberals think they can just fuck the system forever and men will churn on. All it takes is for 10% of males to say "YA KNOW WHAT, FUCK THIS SHIT" and give up or seek justice.

Cunts don't give a fuck. They are too stupid to see 5 foot in front of them. Cunts are just gluttons for chad cock and beta bux. They think they can have it all forever with no consequences. They think betas and omegas will simply take this shit forever. They are very wrong.

Cunts have no concept of morality or justice or anything good at all. They are just parasitic & retarded children who will drain their host until it croaks. They are incapable of rational thought or positivity. They merely pretend to be those things just as they dress themselves up like angels with makeup and pretty clothes. Its all illusion. In reality females are demons in the flesh. Thus they deserve no rights of any kind.

The second female sexual desires matter your civilization begins to rot. It takes a while but every time it goes under. Thats why there are no matriarchies or history of females ruling a country in any way. Because the second they do they fuck it all up and bow down begging for that foreign alpha cock. Lots of suffering comes for everyone else when a nation falls. Which females don't give a fuck about. They love being conquered by other nations with brutal men and getting fucked by those men.

Female humanoid organisms are just worthless pieces of shit. They don't deserve any god damn rights. They don't deserve anything positive. Fucking pieces of shit. I could never feel sympathy for those parasitic shit lords. Females deserve to be treated lesser than shit as their inner quality exists as lower than shit.

livinginhell101, /r/incels 11 Comments [3/22/2017 7:12:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125629

I don’t know exactly how to explain it, but there’s something offensive about pushing a stroller. However, my Irish grandpa, who was very much a tough working man (he was a teamster and foreman at the local brewery — his wife never wore pants or even drove a car), used to push me around on a stroller when I was very small. He’d take me for walks down into the woods in a local park every morning. But I guess when you’re a tough old man you don’t have much left to prove.

The thing is, babies are a woman’s job. I know this because I had to take care of my daughter all by myself quite a bit when she was still arguably an infant. It was no picnic, and I could barely handle it, but I did. If mommy is in the picture, there’s no reason a man should be caring for an infant — men just aren’t equipped for it. It is not only humiliating, but counterproductive.

How would women feel if they were asked to change tires or jack up a car? How about split wood or hammer nails? Many may say “I can do that,” but the truth is that the vast majority of women would look ridiculous trying to do these things. There’s even a good chance they’d hurt themselves.

Probably one of the biggest problems in society now is that our economy and technology have evolved to the point where these man jobs simply aren’t as valuable or necessary as they used to be, but child care, due to the immense amount of time involved in raising children, remains a very important job; unfortunately it simply doesn’t pay. So men are increasingly useless, and you have guys getting shoved into the unnatural role of raising small children, whereas a father’s equal involvement with children should start around school age, when the kids are capable of doing a lot more for themselves and need the discipline and instruction that best comes from a masculine figure.

Unfortunately, young men simply don’t have all that much to offer, so the deal they get stuck with is often pretty lousy. In a number of major cities, young men are already out-earned by young women. This obviously changes power dynamics. This is why you see these guys with papooses.

This is not the first time this has happened, and it always ends in social disaster. What do young men do when they find themselves unneeded and pushed around by society? In most cases they eventually start banding together and taking things. I think we’ll see a lot more rejection of society’s mores by young men pretty soon. The bitchier and more imperious women get, the faster the seeds of insurrection will take root.

Welmer, Chateau Heartiste 13 Comments [3/22/2017 9:45:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 114620

benjamin2k is being naive. Western sluts want and need rape.

This is widely known by anybody who isn't a brainwashed mangina. It's known even among various disparate groups that don't quite like each other, like Red Pillers and conservative Jews/Muslims.

Modern Western women aside from few exceptions like Amish or Hasidic Jews, are disgusting braindead sluts and slugs who enjoy violent men and being raped. The idea that you can enter a relationship with them is insane. They'd kill the child of any man who'd want to take care of it. This is simply because women want to breed with men who make most kids, and such men are stupid, worthless criminals today. So you have this kind of a dissociation where a criminal will make a child and the state/beta cuck will take care of it. The same person can't be a father and take care of a child in advanced feminism.

And remember - if she stays alive a guy won't.

caamib, FSTDT 13 Comments [11/22/2015 4:32:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126164

The Male to Female ratio in terms of contribution to the civilization of mankind through out history has been incredibly one sided. Men and their contributions are 99% of any decent history book. Same goes for science. Females may as well be a a different species all together when compared to the opposite gender. The achievement gap between both genders is bigger than the gap between Chad and Incel looks. Tremendous gap, the biggest contribution women have made was when they were comfort women. Even then that was really the brilliant idea of man. We need to make comfort women a mandatory service for all women for at least 1 year of their lives. That should be their tribute/thanks to men for what we've given them and our civilization as whole.

Multaskruk12, /r/incels 4 Comments [4/9/2017 12:25:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125699

Don’t ask me why but the other day I had the urge to watch the little guy in Different Strokes saying ‘Watcha talking about Willis?’.

First video that came up, gave me a surprise in the first 3 seconds : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le6qeMe7-vM

Don’t know the context of that episode, but ‘Kimberly’ must be no more than 13 years old in it, and judging from the ‘whoas’ from the studio audience, obviously the producers hand picked a crowd of ‘ephebophiles’ (or hebophiles?) to watch the show that day.

Or maybe just 20 years ago, even in the USA, NOBODY thought it was unusual or perverted to find an early adolescent girl attractive.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 8 Comments [3/24/2017 5:21:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 120209

[A review of Charles Murray's "Coming Apart"]

The products of the entertainment industry still usually validated American norms. Subjects such as abortion and homosexuality were never touched upon in television shows, only rarely and disapprovingly in movies. Most liberals were willing to say that extramarital sex was wrong. Only three and one-half percent of American families were headed by a divorced parent. In many neighborhoods, houses were left unlocked and children could go about unsupervised.

But American women had “much to be outraged about,” the author tells us, such as being expected to marry and have children! If Murray gets portrayed as a ‘hard-rightist,’ it is only because presenting data honestly is now all such a designation requires or implies.

...

Murray writes that “being a single mother is tough, and it is appropriate to sympathize with women who are in that situation.” He does not say it is appropriate to be sympathetic to the manchildren of Fishtown, and most readers will be left with the impression that what they need is a good kick in the pants. Yet I wonder whether the same factors did not produce the undesirable behavior of both men and women that he notes today.

In the America of 1963, a high school graduate might expect to find a job which would allow him to marry and permit his wife the leisure to stay home raising a few children. He could buy a freestanding house and a car, and still afford to take the family on a two week vacation every summer. The wife would have been reared with a view to preparing her for the duties of marriage and motherhood; she may even have taken ‘Home Ec’ in school.

Then gradually, beginning in the 1960s, women became convinced marriage was an imposition to be ‘outraged’ about. Helen Gurley Brown began whispering in their ears that an independent career path could be filled with exciting romances involving attractive men, free of the ‘drudgery’ to which marriage consigned their mothers. The family income was abolished in favor of ‘equal pay for equal work.’ The law was changed to permit women to divorce their husbands unilaterally and without grounds. (Wives are responsible for around ninety percent of divorces.)

None of this much affects the men at the top of the income and status hierarchy. They make enough money that even women with personal incomes perceive them as supporters and are willing to marry them. If a wife leaves after the baby is born, child support payments are manageable and a replacement wife is easily found.

The Fishtown girls who might have married working men in 1960 may well be earning more than such men today just by sitting at desks entering data. They can obtain higher quality sperm from more desirable men without submitting to the constraints of lifelong monogamy; the ‘ex’ and/or the taxpayer is made to provide for any resulting children. They even enjoy the sympathy of male commentators for the terrible hardship all this supposedly represents. Is it any wonder such women are reluctant to devote their lives to raising the children of ill-paid construction workers?

The contemporary Fishtown man, his wages reduced by female competition and the ever-decreasing market value of upper-body strength, has correspondingly slim chances of earning enough to make himself an acceptable suitor to any woman with an income of her own. These men are not ‘retreating from the marriage market’; they are being driven from it as a matter of deliberate policy.

Even if a particular working class man beats the odds and finds a girl to marry, he cannot expect the satisfaction of supporting her; she may well end up supporting him. And what self-respecting man wants to end up like that poor sap uselessly tagging along behind his wife who just bought all the groceries?

But this is still not the worst. Prospective husbands stand a good chance of losing everything in the divorce settlement within a few years of the wedding. Child support is not so easy when it must be paid through low-skilled labor. Even if you avoid being jailed as a ‘deadbeat dad,’ you will certainly not have enough left over to contemplate a second marriage.

In short, the American dream of a home and family through honest labor is now far out of reach for an increasing number of low-status men. Under these circumstances, what is such a man to do with his life? I’d say an unconstrained bachelor existence with plenty of time for amusements looks very much like a rational choice. The male commentariat may make you out to be a bum, but that sure beats years of performing all the hard work traditionally required to support a family and then not getting the family.

Aristotle understood that certain virtues have social presuppositions: liberality, for example, can hardly be expected from persons living hand-to-mouth. Male industriousness, I would suggest, also presupposes certain social arrangements. Monogamy and the family wage system give you the Irish immigrant who strives to make gentlemen of his children with every blow of his axe; liberated women earning equal pay for their equal work bring forth the men of the Sunshine Club.

So single motherhood and the decline in male industriousness our author describes cannot be spirited away simply by getting men and women to the altar. ‘Outrageous’ though it may seem to a generation steeped in feminist propaganda, the natural economic basis of marriage must also be restored. White men are programmed by evolution to be providers. If you deliberately rearrange society to render this function superfluous, do you have any right to complain when men stop knocking themselves out to perform it?

F. Roger Devlin, The Occidental Quarterly 10 Comments [7/2/2016 6:25:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125842

Chad's pleasurable experiences should be taxed just like wealth.

Just like people are taxed progressively, Chad should also be taxed for the pleasurable experiences he has in life. This tax would then be distributed towards incels to help alleviate disparity.

Because it would be impractical to directly give Chad's pleasurable experiences to incels, this is how I propose it would be done. A dollar estimate would be made on Chad's experiences, which would be calculated by averaging the dollar amount that incels would pay to have these experiences. Then Chad would have to pay a tax percentage on these experiences (say like 30% or whatever the local tax rate is).

How could anyone disagree with this? It sounds like a perfectly fair system and would help fix inequality.

gstvtrp, /r/incels 13 Comments [3/30/2017 4:12:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125452

Let’s face it: This generation of Incels is lost

We are in the worst place at the worst time in terms of relationships and sex. 50/60 years ago, the dating market was completely different from now. Sex was only allowed in marriage, people who had it outside of wedlock were shamed and punished. But then the sexual revolution happened. In theory, this should have been a great idea: Casual sex and sex outside of marriage are now accepted. People can enjoy it without any restrictions. But this had one flaw: Women don’t want sex. Sex is a resource for them they use to get what they want. So the demand for sex went higher, since men wanted to enjoy this casual sex but the supply stayed the same. Women were not interested in it, thus creating a power imbalance on the dating market in favour of women. Just like in a relationship, where the partner who cares less about the relationship has the most power.

Now this back 20/30 years this was not this bad since there where still some restrictions like limited options. You had your town/city maybe the neighbourhood town but the number of potential partners was small. Then technology began to make progress, the internet came and with it new forms of dating. Suddenly you just didn’t have a handful of people to choose from but the whole internet. Again, theoretically this should have benefited men and women. More options mean more chances to find the one for you. But now the power imbalance hit with full force. Without limitations, women could demand best men thanks to the power they had on the dating market. Instead to settle and lower their standards like they were forced to do back then, they could be as demanding as they wanted to and still find someone.

Now we are in the strange situation that the standards for men are still rising while the standards for female are dropping. Men get told they should go to the gym, get a good career, be better looking, be richer. On the other side, women get told even the 400 lbs landwhale is beautiful and deserve a fit and tall men. Thanks to the position of power females hold in the market, the chances are good she finds one. This creates a spiral in which the standards for men rise and rise while many men struggle to keep up with it or are left behind. Men are forced to go lower and lower to find relationships and sex making it even easier for women to date up, creating incels in the progress since we don’t have the option to date down.

And this is what I mean when I say we are in the worst place in the worst time. The market is dictated by females, creating even higher standards since nobody challenges their position of power. Men are like hamsters in their wheels trying to run faster to keep up with it, fuelling the female privilege even more. A downward spiral that creates incels, or simply men who can’t keep up with the rising standards.

As a summation, I encourage my fellow incels to stop the self-improvement. You are chasing standards that will get higher day by day, encouraging females to set the limits even higher since they can. Someone who comes here and says you have to improve means that you should bow to the standards female can set because they have the power in the market. Instead of following the demands of females, we should ask: What can we do shift the power in the market to men?

EconomicsofSex, /r/incels 19 Comments [3/16/2017 8:37:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125562



Anonymous, Whisper 14 Comments [3/19/2017 4:53:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125781

Are Incels the most reviled members of society ever?

(TL:DR below if required)

Inceldom is not something those under its banner can control, any more than a breast cancer patient should be lambasted for letting herself get sick, and yet, only the former is subject to hatred and ridicule of such a kind as deemed, not only permissible, but encouraged.

Throughout history, there have been many examples of oppressed and reviled peoples, so let's take a look at a few and compare them to the plight of the incel.

Women


The normie favourite. Truly women have suffered unfairly throughout history, right? Surely they're still unequal today and in need of the mighty fist of feminism to even come close to man's privilege, right?
Currently, in first world countries, there is no group more privileged than woman: to suggest a biological difference between the sexes means you're a misogynistic pig. Criticism of any kind, if directed at a woman, is rendered not only moot, but considered to be a vitriolic attack of society's special sneauxphlakes.

There is an expectation that women deserve to be treated better than men, which is propogated by both men and women alike: men should always hold the door open for women; men are expected to pay for dinner; men are expected to be the providers for the family (if women want to work, they're encouraged, but men receive no such encouragement, it's merely expected of them); women are viewed as innocent and preferential in legal disputes (97% of alimony payments are made by men, women win exclusive custody 79% of the time, and women who make false rape claims are believed in spite of the notion that the accused should be considered innocent until proven guilty.)

How about the historical treatment of women? Traditionally, women have also been coddled by society. When men were required to hunt and kill to supply for small hunter-gatherer societies, women were spared from this and left safety away from any danger. Up until very recently, women were also spared from the horrors of war (despite Hillary's absurd claims) it has always been the duty of men to defend, en mass, the rights and safety of their women back home. Women have historically been treated well, even in great societies like ancient Greece where men recognized women's inferiority and preferred the company of other men, women were treated well and respected, many members of Greek society worshiping the female gods more than any other.

And in spite of all this; in spite of every advantage afforded to them, women still want more. Now, in front of the wall street bull, a little girl stands defiant. Why? As a symbol of strength against a non-existent wage gap. Society propogates a myth to make women feel better, and then builds upon that myth with symbols of strength to make women feel better still. Clearly, then, women are not so disadvantaged.

The blacks and the Jews


The two Oppression All-stars. There can be no denying that western countries have, historically, treated black people poorly. Colonialism and the ensuing slavery were clear and systematic breaches of the human rights of millions of people.

However, slavery is not exclusive to blacks. In fact, blacks were very often either the sellers, or the buyers of slaves. The word slave refers, originally, to the slavic people who were frequently forced into slavery in the middle ages. Slavery is not and was not exclusive to blacks, and yet, it is blacks who benefit from its having happened.

Affirmative action is hugely prevalent in America. Black students receive black-exclusive scholarships and receiving greater encouragement and support than non-black students.

Of course, racism existed beyond the abolishment of slavery, and still exists today. However, there have always been those who have stood up to racism. Most famous of all was Martin Luther King Jr who is universally praised for his work helping African-Americans, but he is not alone. Many people have dedicated their lives to helping blacks, some have even lost their lives in so doing: but no one has done this for incels. Incels, in spite of the hatred and discrimination they receive, are not beneficiaries of support or affirmative action in anyway. Imagine the response you would receive by going to /r/peopleofcolour and telling them they deserve to be hated or discriminated against. You would be banned sightwide for extreme prejudice, and yet, to do the same on /r/incels is considered amusing and fair. There are clear correlations between height or attractiveness and success, and yet society turns a blind eye to incels' plight. So while it is the case that African-Americans were the object of much discrimination, there has been a significant reversal and now much is done in their favour. Incels, however, are recipients only of hatred: no one wishes to aid their cause.

Likewise, the Jews and their oppression in Nazi Germany might be a favoured counter-argument to the assertion that incels are the most universally reviled societal group, however, this argument falls flat as well. It is of course true that the Jews were systematically despised and considered sub-human. This fact they share with incels.

However, there is a clear difference: When the Nazis considered the Jews sub-human, the world went to war to defend them. When the world considers incels to be subhuman, people just laugh at their plight and go on, encouraging their subhuman treatment. It is clear then which of the two is the more systematically despised.

Other [mental] illnesses


Inceldom, like race or sexuality, is genetic. If it can be resolved by weight loss, or lifting more, it's not inceldom: it's volcedlom. True inceldom is incurable and predetermined.

However, inceldom is not treated the same way as other illnesses at all. Let's take a close look at the subtle distinctions in societal treatment.

Cancer is, in many of its forms, impossible to prevent with the decisions one makes. I'm sorry normies, but that means you can't tell poor Timmy to shower his tumor away. People that suffer from cancer are praised for their bravery; they are the beneficiaries of myriad charities, as well as the objects of ad campaigns and propaganda. Just like inceldom, cancer is a terrible disease, but only one of the diseased individuals will receive love and compassion while he suffers; the other will be taunted as he suffers in solitude.

Furthermore, if we look at how people, reddit especially, treats depressed people, we see an even cleared example of the double standard that derives from pure hatred of incels. Can you imagine the fervent rage that reddit would unleash if someone told a depression sufferer to 'just stop being sad'? And yet, that is the advice incels receive daily. We suffer the same, and yet, while others are supported, we are condemned.

TL:DR - plz read, it's not like you're too busy banging sluts. If you are: Incels might just be the most universally hated and discriminated against members of society. In spite of this, and where other hated sects have been assisted, incels are ridiculed and hurt further for merely existing. There is no help because they are deemed unworthy of it. It is not seen as noble to fight for incels rights as it might to fight for the rights of women or minorities, so we must suffer, because to propagate our suffering is seen not as cruel, but as just.

(Emphasis original)

RippedRichAndIncel, /r/incels 12 Comments [3/28/2017 4:59:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125879

Married game is controversial in the manosphere, since one is supposed to be able to depend on one's wife to refrain from cheating and frigidity without the need to use game. At the same time, women's AWALT tendencies remain in effect after the wedding and they will be repulsed if a man let himself go (e.g. by abandoning all of his interests outside of the relationship and dropping his workout routine). Donal Graeme writes:[1]

Game is perhaps the only method available to most married men to bring some measure of control to their marriage. The State no longer provides that control. The general culture no longer provides that control. And increasingly religion, Christianity itself, no longer provides that control. Married men (most of them anyways) need Game in order to combat an environment that encourages self-destructive behavior in women. Should they need it? No, of course not. If our civilization was sane Game wouldn't be necessary. But it isn't sane, and men need every tool at their disposal to make marriage work. This includes Game.

Not everything that is included under the umbrella of Game is necessarily proper in marriage, mind you.


According to Roosh, "The extreme of this inauthenticity is the married man who must apply “game” on his wife, even though she pledged to dedicate her life to him unto death, just so that she doesn’t get bored with him and cheat before draining his blood in a divorce. While the player has to put on a clown suit when he goes to the club to pick up women, the married man has to permanently wear the clown suit and hope she never strays, especially if he married an attractive Western woman." He continues, "The problem is that if you can’t be honest with someone and express your true thoughts, you’re in a relationship that can’t possibly last. If you’re applying game to your wife, and that game is not congruent with your beliefs, the marriage will end."[2]

In Roosh Q&A: Patriarchy & Tradition, Roosh noted that married game involves taking the lead and being strong.

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 3 Comments [3/31/2017 12:25:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125941

If I'm the one putting food on your table, giving you a bed to sleep in and a roof over your head, and being willing to sacrifice my life for your safety - figuratively speaking - you better believe you are going to follow my rules. That is not up for debate, at all, and not least because there's nothing you could do about it anyway. I don't need any further "moral basis" and you are not in a position to negotiate or make demands. If you consider that "enslavement", then find another country to live in.


The difference between you and me, I guess, is that I don't mind everything collapsing. You'd suffer far more than I would and you'd learn a valuable lesson. Liberal Western civilization has lost its way and run its course in any case, so we're overdue for a change in direction, and if necessary rebuilding. If the builders of civilization aren't being given their due respect and acknowledgment, then I'd rather see it destroyed. Threats of collapse mean absolutely nothing to me.

LeoSiles, NY Mag (comments) 7 Comments [4/2/2017 7:27:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: ScrappyB

Quote# 125733

Because of the outbreak of insanity no one should be breastfeeding in public. . . I understand emergency situations but exposing yourself in public with a child only provokes harrasment, not on you but the child! Please be mindful that sex offenders live an everyday life like we do. Why are you gonna use your child to provoke them?

Rachel Lonnie Cefalu, Facebook 11 Comments [3/25/2017 11:17:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126396

"Women are human beings. They are complex."

Know how many times someone has felt the need to say this about men?

The reason so many turds around here insist on saying this about women is they are nagged by the fear (and subconscious realization) that women are not complex, nor are they in any meaningful way similar to men.

They want them to be, but they just aren't.

There's this insistence on anthropomorphizing females because the men who do this identify with weakness. Since they themselves feel weak, they insist on trying to put people they believe are weak at the top. It's the psychology of the modern liberal. Their own feelings of inferiority make them want to put those they subconsciously feel are inferior at the top of the food chain.

TimRattayGotScrewed, /r/incels 15 Comments [4/17/2017 8:12:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126469

Please institute the One-drop rule on /r/incels

I find myself disgusted with the demographic of this subreddit. I know I am far from the only incel who feels this way; the roastie problem is out of control.
To remedy this most urgent issue, I hereby request that a modified One-drop rule be brought into effect for the purpose of maintaining the purity of this subreddit.

The rule: any female user who has prior relationship experience (has swallowed "one drop" of Chad's semen) shall be forbidden from participating in this subreddit.

The implementation: automatically parse submitters' post history for the following strings and summarily ban the user:

my boyfriend
my bf
my ex
hubby
as a mother
slut-shaming


At the suggestion of /u/xyrxyr, submissions to the following subreddits are also grounds for an automatic ban:

/r/NiceGuys
/r/JustNeckbeardThings


Incels, I welcome your suggestions and criticisms
Normies, please do kill yourselves

yesthisisfeel, /r/incels 9 Comments [4/19/2017 9:38:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep