Quote# 129707

I think most women are better fitted to be at home baking cookies and changing diapers.

I think that St. Joan of Arc was called by God to fulfill a special mission, which she did in as feminine a way as possible. All women are called to sanctity. Some as wives and mothers, others as nuns, and others as single women. All women are called to fulfill their God-given gender roles in a modest manner, imitating the Blessed Mother as much as they can. And St. Joan of Arc obviously did this or the church would not have declared her a saint.

Radical Feminists are evil women spewing their liberal poison everywhere, desecrating the holy and sacred calling of motherhood. And they have obviously spilled their poison over onto the Saints, now, too.

jvk, Cathinfo 12 Comments [7/25/2017 5:01:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125499

Much as I like to trumpet the importance of a woman's right to choose all things at all times, there's one choice I simply cannot understand: the choice of an otherwise sane and healthy woman not to have children.

If a would-be mother is a singleton of 40 who decides to have a baby without a partner, I might wish she'd thought of it sooner and prepared for it better - but I understand.

If she's half of a lesbian couple who 'borrows' the wherewithal, I might cross my fingers that the child is not teased at school - but I understand. Even if she's a 66-year- old pregnant pensioner, threatening to turn motherhood into a freak show, I might (indeed, I do) think she's monstrously selfish and dangerously wrong - but again, more or less, I understand.

Yet if she says she hasn't a shred of maternal feeling in her, moreover, if she says she would prefer to concentrate on her career and that a child would only get in the way of it, then my head might acknowledge her right to do so. But my heart whispers: 'Lady, you're weird.'

It was welcome news, therefore, to discover this week that I am not alone. Research conducted over six years shows that far from bosses and colleagues always being suspicious of a working mother, the opposite is becoming true: it is the childless woman who is regarded as cold and odd.

As a result, it is these single-track careerists who are increasingly likely to be vilified, refused jobs and denied promotion because many employers believe them to lack what the study calls 'an essential humanity'. And I know exactly what they mean.

In the little hothouse of my own trade as a hack, I play a game with myself. Reading all the other female scribblers, sometimes with grudging admiration and sometimes none at all, I try to guess from their expression of their world view whether or not they are mothers.

I haven't - yet - been wrong. Now, with MPs so much in the headlines, I've extended the game and started to guess about the women among them, too.

As far as I can tell, my score is also pretty high there - even though it's just a feeling. On both sides of the political divide, as with the writers, it's not what MPs say or do, so much as how they go about it.

'Mothers bring something extra'

And if that touch of 'essential humanity' - or its absence - colours such notably tough professions, it's hardly surprising that employers are starting to notice that the same applies across the spectrum of workplaces.

Of course, we need not be silly about it.

Nobody wishes to see a female soldier in combat with a six-week-old infant in one arm and a rifle in the other.

Or a high-flier working 20-hour days while still breast-feeding. Or the mother of a small brood taking on any job of such erratic hours that she cannot promise them when or even if she'll be home.

But most jobs aren't like that - and most children don't stay babies for long.

Besides which, in my experiences both as a colleague and an employer, I have found that mothers almost always bring something extra to the job, to the benefit of all.

It's not the mothers, for a start, who are going to turn up late and hungover after a night on the razz; they'll have been up, dressed and alert for hours, having cooked a family breakfast and delivered their children to school. On time.

It's not the mothers, usually, who run the office bitch-fest.

They're not there to compete for the attentions of the male executives; they're there to get out of the house; they're there because they genuinely enjoy some adult company; and they're there because they have mouths to feed other than their own and shoes to buy for someone else's feet.

Two-thirds of working mothers, a recent survey found, could not provide for the children they love in the manner they would wish if they lost their jobs. So there's incentive for you.

They will, it is true, snatch time off for poorly children and Christmas carol services. And it's true they will insist that, in return for arriving on the dot of 9am, they must also leave on the dot of 5pm.

But rarely have I encountered a mother who did not offer to make up time lost, often in lunch hours. As for leaving on time, put enough mothers together in one workplace and you'll get rid of the ghastly ethos of 'presenteeism', whereby people vie for plaudits based solely on how late - albeit often uselessly - they hang around the office.

The prioritising that may baffle other people is a cinch for a woman who has spent years juggling a household. Negotiating skills? A request for 10 per cent off an overdue invoice is nothing to a woman who has had to broker a deal on Britain's Got Talent versus bedtime.

When it comes to emergencies, if you have run all the way to a clinic with a terrified toddler vomiting down your neck then, trust me, a package delayed in transit is a piece of cake. And if those are the tangibles, the intangibles - the 'essential humanity' - are more important still.

You cannot be a mother without knowing something about selflessness, compassion, generosity, commitment, fierce loyalty and plain hard work. You cannot - surely - be a boss and not value assets such as those in your staff.

Nor is it the boss who pays the price for the extras a mother brings with her; she's the one who pays for that. Enough reams have been written about the long hours of slog it takes to run a home and hold down a job at the same time. Yet still we keep doing it because we want our work, our independence and our money.

But, more than all the things we want, we actually need our children; they complete us as women, they are our light and our love and our legacy.

We feel desperately sorry for those who yearn for children they cannot have; the unwilling barren, if you will. But when we meet a woman who chooses her childlessness in the belief that there is something out there worth more, we smile politely even while - once again - our guts whisper: 'Lady, you're weird.'

So three cheers for the employers who are catching on, the ones who don't want to people their workforces with the cold, the calculating, the sad and the mad. The only question is: what took you so long?

Carol Sarler, Daily Mail 17 Comments [3/18/2017 2:52:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 72850

The first question any sane, self-loving woman would ask upon realizing that the vast majority of males are rapists is how to keep these rapists away from girls and women. The fact that so many women instead ask how to keep the males from being rapists is a manifestation of feminine masochism.

Margaret, A Room of Our Own 164 Comments [5/10/2010 8:51:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 248
Submitted By: Boy Wonder
WTF?! || meh

Straw Dystopia Award

except the OP thinks it's utopia

Quote# 127407

Just consider this for a second:


Women would be sold at bustling markets in order to be used as sex toys/domestic servants/breeding slaves, with the higher quality ones possibly being entered in beauty competitions with large prizes for incels with the most high quality and fertile women.


There'd also be breeding centers if you want to donate some of your cum in order to get a son with the highest quality genes, and zoos where you could admire sluts and harlots in their natural environments: kitchens, bedrooms, and dark cold caves.


As for normies and Chads, we could use them for organs, meat, labor, slaves, punching bags, or even just luxury items for incels who want to own more then just women. (Not to mention any homosexual/bisexual incels who'd like a sex toy. After all, an incel is an incel, no matter their sexuality, and we all deserve our own high quality sex toys.)


Of course, women, normies, and Chads would all lose the ability to vote, as they would automatically vote for the person most sympathetic to them, and thus the one who is most likely to give them more (undeserved) rights.


As for nearcels and volcels, they'd basically have the same rights as non-Chad men do currently, although they wouldn't have all the benefits that incels and truecels would get in this new society, such as the ability to buy women and/or normies in bulk, or the ability to hold high positions of political power.


Wizards and KHHV incels would, of course, hold the most power, and would be the ones most likely to have careers in politics and law enforcement (AKA keeping women and normies in their places).


And, if we really need one, we'll make a free woman/normie rank, for those extremely rare women and normies that have proven themselves capable of actual rational thought and genuine intellect. This rank enables them to get jobs, own property, publish/sell content that they've created, and (occasionally) say no to sex/labor. Of course, free women/normies would be few and far in between, and their rank would be stripped from them the moment they attempted to disobey or harm an incel, and they would be automatically be forced into prostitution/labor, and would be auctioned off to a lucky pimp/slave master as soon as possible.


This would be a far better, far happier world IMHO.

rango-mango, reddit.com 22 Comments [5/22/2017 1:11:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Skitten219
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 133044

A girl in line at the store asked me to open a bottle of water for her. The first thing that came to mind is to tell her she's not entitled to my help, but that seemed petty and churlish. Besides, I don't have the social skills to come off as anything but awkward and cringy in that situation.

So instead I opened the bottle using my index and middle fingers and handed it to her with an eye roll. Was that cringy as well? At least I didn't have to say anything.

How can someone so pathetically weak and useless even survive? How does she handle a dick with those shitty useless hands? Even babies can open bottles which is why bottles of dangerous things have child-proof caps.

Anyway, I feel bad for not denying female privilege but that would have required more social skills than I have.

Angry_runt, r/incels 14 Comments [10/16/2017 6:17:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 132494

Female "Intelligence"


JonSnowDunno, /r/incels 8 Comments [10/3/2017 5:52:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 134577

Men are not human to begin with.
The defining feature in what is and what is not human is ‘’Does it know right from wrong’’, since males do not know what is right from wrong they are not human.
And also, all men are pedophiles, and therefore every pedophile is male.

comradejordan, Tumblr 8 Comments [11/28/2017 5:55:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129911

There is this myth perpetuated that child sexual abuse is terrible and the worst kind of abuse. In fact, the research doesn’t even show this. When it is actual abuse (force, coercion, deceit is used) the child is more often than not going to bounce back and recover. This of course ignores that most instances of “child sexual abuse” are consensual and cause no intrinsic harm. Perpetuating the Trauma Myth is the most damaging thing done to children in modern western nations.

Goat , Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 4 Comments [7/29/2017 12:19:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: anon
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129474

I'm so happy I'm not a woman and I don't have all these crazy chemicals in my head. It's like constantly being on drugs. Which is sort of what I'm like, but my drugs are way better then those crazy drugs women have in their brain naturally. You think my drugs are bad? What about the crazy drugs you have in your brains growing naturally?

NAPnationalist, Deviantart forums 5 Comments [7/18/2017 10:53:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 132468

Women in abusive relationships should be sent to prison. They are the fuel for their abusive Chads they'll later cry about, they are just as bad but also spineless and disgusting. They aren't victims of anything at all. they are in on it. If beating someone up is a crime than willingly letting them beat you up is supporting a criminal activity and should get them locked up as conspirators.

Of course if it can be proven that they didn't have a choice cause they were locked in a basement or if they report the Chad and leave, then they shouldn't go to prison. But if they are caught in an ongoing relationship with history of abuse, they should be treated like criminals they are and not like victims.

Alia_Harkonnen, r/incels 10 Comments [10/2/2017 12:51:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126846

[A promotion for a short-film the author made about an alternate US where a totalitarian theocracy takes over and prevents women from gaining the vote (the author intends this as utopian btw)]

Fellow ROK fans, tired of every new film having a militant feminist theme? Want to see a universe on video in which men create a paradise on earth with their wise rule, and insolent women causing trouble are given their just reward? My short film (18 minutes) is called Pax Masculina (Latin for Peace of Men) and is an alternate history science fiction movie.

It all started when I posed the question “What would the United States be like today if women had never received the right to vote?” Check out the two minute trailer below. I think you will love the PAX universe.

...

In Pax Masculina, a theocratic totalitarian regime takes over the United States in 1910. Under this government, women have few rights like in Old Testament or Victorian England culture. The suffragettes were defeated and women never got the vote.

Uninhibited by the influence of women, what follows is a century of peace and prosperity, known as the Pax Masculina. Out of disgruntled suffragettes evolved the Women’s Resistance Movement (WRM) which violently opposes the regime. The movie takes place in 2016 when the WRM has increased aggression in its opposition to the governing patriarchy in their fight for equality of the sexes.

The Women’s Resistance Movement uses assassinations and bombings to create terror and kill without mercy. Seduction and murder of policemen and government officials are common tactics. The government induces its own terror with televised torture and execution of captured women soldiers. The movie’s Facebook site gives more details and many behind-the-scenes photos from the film.

The following photos represent the philosophy of the regime:




The conflict between the regime and WRM is really a battle for the hearts and minds of young women who might join the WRM. When a girl turns 16, she is eligible to be married. Husbands pay the father a dowry and there is a transfer of property. There is an all-girls high school where harsh teachers use ruler and paddle freely to discipline unruly females.

Girls are forced to watch public hangings of captured WRM soldiers on classroom televisions. In the photographed scene below, one girl jokes around about the threat of hanging beside a victim she has just had to watch.

...

A symbol on the wall of all classrooms remind them of the consequences of having a bad attitude. Gentlemen, how many times have you wanted to tell a woman to “lose the attitude”? In this universe, it is official policy!



The beautiful women of the WRM wear steampunk inspired uniforms designed for combat and seduction as they engage in hand-to-hand combat with police. Authorities have better weapons but hesitate to use them since they want to capture these arrogant women alive for public display.

...

Captured WRM soldiers are hanged publicly with a worldwide TV broadcast of the event as if it was the World Cup or Superbowl. There is no drop and a large diameter rope is used to haul them up into the air so they slowly strangle, preventing permanent damage to necks or windpipes. There is a good possibility that they will be half hanged (let down before dead) to be made a sex-slave to a deserving man. This discourages young women from joining the WRM while entertaining the populace.

As for the status of the film, the cut is finished and being submitted to film festivals. To stay up to date about its release, follow the Facebook page. The world premier of Pax Masculina will be at Comicpalooza in Houston May 12-14. The exact screening time and date will be posted on the aforementioned Facebook page.

I made this film to express my view and to share my artistic vision, not to make money. Eventually it will just be posted on YouTube or Vimeo to be viewed for free. But for now, festival rules prevent that to retain eligibility. My goal is to make a full length feature film which expands the story line of the PAX universe. But that is a year or two away. Now, I just want to share the vision with like-minded individuals such as ROK readers. I hope the trailer whets your appetite andI would love to hear feedback. My best estimate for release of the short film for public viewing is six months.

I admire Roosh more than I can say after having experienced similar harassment by the social justice warriors against me. Maybe he will agree to be a consultant on the feature film? I made this movie with a balanced perspective instead of the expected female empowerment manifesto. But the mere hint that a government which excludes women might be successful has led to an effort to silence my creative voice.

Instead of reasoned debate, some think I shouldn’t be permitted to express my artistic opinion. In addition, I have openly promoted the men’s right movement (posted links to ROK articles for example), and I have dared to say some positive things about President Trump. I have been vilified and my reputation decimated with lies.

Having practiced engineering for over 40 years, I am used to dealing with truth and facts. I have learned that the artistic community is in general close-minded and truth means nothing to them. I am astonished at their ability to lie without hesitation, without guilt, without apology. Some “artists” show a total lack of character and honor. Any deviation from political correctness is not tolerated. That will be the focus of a future post. For now, I plan to continue to make movies that tell the truth and present an alternative viewpoint.

Pax Masculina, Return of Kings 32 Comments [5/3/2017 4:52:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130691

It seems to me that human resources has become one of those gender-specific jobs, like logger or cocktail waitress. In my experience, HR is overwhelmingly female, and these are the people who have the power to hire or fire you.

In my limited experience working with female supervisors, I have found them to be less forgiving and less considerate, possibly because they think that men only respond well to abusive slave-driver types. I have also noticed that they are far less likely to directly warn workers or inform them in plain terms that they are dissatisfied. This tends to make male workers feel that their authority is capricious and cruel, and that they can be terminated for anything at any time.

The end result is that men – and particularly men of a certain type – are being pushed out of certain occupations and organizations, and find themselves driven to more exclusively male lines of work, such as construction, driving and law enforcement, and this may explain why men’s unemployment is so much higher than women’s in the current recession. In fact, I would say that the increasing domination of the corporate world by women in middle management – especially HR – has greatly restricted occupational options for younger men, even as senior male managers go out of their way to foster and accommodate women.

What I’d like to know if this corresponds with greater productivity. I suspect that it does not, but I’d have to see the numbers.

One theory I have heard is that senior male managers use females in middle management to keep workers in line and more easily fire people, because they have less of a sense of responsibility for those who work under them. This leads to a more humble and frightened work force, and despite warm and fuzzy talk about wanting “satisfied” workers, perhaps corporate bosses (almost all male) actually want the people working for them to live in fear. A scared and humble work force will go the extra mile to avoid being fired, and will work for less compensation.

I am curious as to whether readers have observed the same. Has the introduction of women into management fundamentally changed the way we work? If so, has their arrival been accompanied by fear and insecurity in the workplace, or has it been positive on the balance? We ought to have these discussions, because women are not going to leave the workforce any time soon, and perhaps it’s time to figure out how we might mitigate some of the negative effects.

Given that there has been a lot of speculation recently about how women will dominate the economy (or what’s left of it) in the future, these are perfectly reasonable concerns for men.

W. F. Price, Welmer 9 Comments [8/17/2017 9:45:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126428

Below the neck I'm more attractive than 99.9% of the world

But I'm still incel. Self improvement is a joke. No femcunt would pick the subhuman faced dude who benches 4 plates when skinny-boi chad is available.

Stop telling us to improve ourselves, normies. In every way I can control, I'm better than you. But my genetics have doomed me to inceldom.

RippedRichAndIncel, /r/incels 20 Comments [4/18/2017 11:22:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129794

I've been Instagram stalking a girl that's a 8/10 puerto rican/Dominican stunner. She travels all the time, paid for by sugar daddies and meets amazing people almost every time she goes out. This is all before she even turns 21. On top of that, she claims to have 'depression' and 'social anxiety'.

It infuriates me that attractive women can go out and make friends with anyone at any bar, or be taken for the time of their lives by the most attractive, extroverted studs in the area in that very same night. Back in the day, when what few friends I had went out, it would be largely uneventful.

Now, while attractive people like her are out living stimulating lives full of social interaction, me and other incels like you, live to rot while our brains deteriorate, alone in our dark rooms. And this is all because of our FACE (and gender to an extent). The fact that we will experience maybe a 1/100th of the life they live, fucks with my head. This has been the hardest black pill to swallow.

MashedPotatoFace, r/incels 6 Comments [7/27/2017 3:50:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 81990

But, as the post title implies, the Edmonton Slutwalk girls have gone a step further. They are explicitly passing themselves off as sluts. This is fortunate, as it means that now we can start bringing the legal and moral force of society to bear upon them. To re-iterate:
Every woman marching in the Edmonton Slut Walk is publicly declaring herself a slut. This means every woman there desires sex with any and all partners. Any sexual activity you initiate with them comes with implied consent. They cannot say no, and if they do understand all their 'no's mean yes. They are all asking for it. They want it bad. Now. From you. Go get 'em!


Now if you disagree, if you think that's not what this is about at all, then two things come to mind:

1. If a bunch of women stand on the street claiming that they are shoe shiners, and they refuse to shine your shoes, you not only have a false advertising charge you can lay on them, but also discriminatory business practices. Women claiming to be nymphomaniacs who can't get enough may just find themselves having to explain why they are so prudish.
2. By their own admission, they are lying bitches. The worst kind of woman. All marching on the street. Together.


If your wife is one of them, I'm very very sorry. Maybe a good rape might make her a little more manageable around the house.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child, The Third Edge of the Sword 165 Comments [6/16/2011 3:49:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 387
Submitted By: David
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129296

Why does the roastie wear so much perfume?
Is it to hide that their snatch smells like an ancient tomb?

Or could it be meant to attract and groom,
To fuck a Chad in his Fruit of the Loom?

This solemn blackpill fills me with gloom,
Femoids are whores starting from the womb.

My_Post_Is_On_Topic, r/incels 6 Comments [7/18/2017 9:27:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126871

Women demand to be treated equally as men. But, what makes them think they deserve it?

I mean, they actually have nothing to offer, Men have superior intellect, Men work harder,Men are stronger, Men are more moral and kind, Men think using reason and logic, Men are the ones who keep things running. Women only have wet holes to offer and that isnt even that grand. So they get worshiped by betas and this over inflates their egos. They're all just illusions , take away the make up, perfume, done up hair and fancy clothes and ask yourself what is she really offering me? Nothing, yet the way they act these days is off putting,the way they speak , act , think , full of pride and ego.

In a relationship, men provide cars, a house, money etc...what do women offer?

Men are on the top of the world, they run the world. Women dont. So why should they have equal rights?

Its not realistic...its just not realistic.

sani91, Deviantart 16 Comments [5/3/2017 9:24:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 132172

We are all led to believe that rape is the most violent and cruel crime committed against femoids, and humanity as a whole. We are consistently reminded on how repugnant and malevolent it is -- but what they are not telling us is how the thing that is called rape is a way of femoids to get attention, validation and the support that they want. I mean, just think about it: whenever a femoid gets raped, the creature goes on to cry and moan about it until the end of times solely due to the fact that she knowns that people will always pity her and give her love and attention; even though she's completely over it.

You'll often see them writing books and becoming motivational speakers to tell the whole world how they should be pitied more -- ignoring the fact that they could have avoided the predicament if they didn't get drunk or dress like sluts. It shows you that whatever it maybe, society is always supportive towards femoids. But that cannot be said towards the countless of innocent men who get falsely accused and convicted due to these creatures.

Femoids can accuse men of rape falsely and without any evidence only to just get away with it -- and because of this hundreds and hundreds of men are falsely convicted every year due to the uprising of false rape charges. Their reputation destroyed, their families and friends disown them, no company will ever hire them, and all because they were falsely convicted. These poor souls lose their very life's due to the evil cunts that are femoids.

Once a man gets falsely convicted there is no going back. His life is over. Even if he was later released after proving his innocence, there will always be a group of people that will look at him in a bad way because of the fact that they still think he is guilty. It's a literal death sentence. Yet femoids still have the audacity to tell people that rape is the worst crime out there. No, it isn't, you cunts. It never will be. One day you will all pay for the crimes you have committed and the innocent men you put behind bars. Judgment day is coming.

Lookismisreal, r/incels 2 Comments [9/27/2017 10:03:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 132525

One of the major telecom companies in my country has this kiosk at the local hypermarket where they have Chad's and Stacies trying to sell phone, internet and entertainment subscriptions.

My mom got roped in by one of the Chad's who tried to upgrade her internet and slap on some entertainment package BS, but she had him call me to discuss technical details. My mom is 74 so she doesn't understand any technical stuff.

Anyway he calls me and explains the details, seems OK but my mom has a DSL modem, I was pretty sure this new internet subscription was cable because it's 100Mbit. He assures me it will work with the DSL modem. I tell my mom to hold off on buying until I verify it.

She calls me back and says that she ordered it anyway. Turns out I was right, it's a cable connection. Now she has to buy a new cable modem for 100 bucks or something. Moral of the story: I love my mom but women are fucking dumb, they cannot resist the Chad.

BlackPillDealer, r/incels 5 Comments [10/3/2017 1:07:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 107760

The popular narrative today is that women demanded the right to vote and the menfolk just told them no until they got tired of their whining. After all, why wouldn’t a woman want more rights?

Turns out there are plenty of reasons why most women would want their own rights restricted, and they all have to do with women knowing the true nature of women. As the saying goes, “A misogynist is a man who hates women as much as women hate each other.” Women know exactly how terrible they can be. A feminist friend of mine once told me, “I envy men, because you can put two random guys in a college dorm together and they’ll get along, but that never happens with two random girls.”

The anti-suffragist organizations had the same numbers among women in America and the United Kingdom as the suffragist organizations, often even excluding men from joining. More women than men were opposed to women’s suffrage. In fairness, some of these groups supported women’s suffrage in local elections.

But all of them feared the hell that would be spawned from complete women’s suffrage, namely the soft socialism we live in today. Ever notice how everything Obama says is pro-woman but that he’s dialed-down his pro-black agenda? It’s because women are the only fans he still has left. Even the blacks don’t want him anymore.

Here’s a few reasons why women themselves did not want to involve themselves in politics.

Less Than Feminine

It’s unbecoming for a woman to be caught up in the affairs of politics. It just isn’t sexy. Nobody likes an activist. A woman doped up on Fox News or HuffPo is as disturbing as your stepmother screaming at the referee at a high school basketball game.

Women get passionate about things, often that whichever her man is passionate about. This can be a very good thing in the right contexts. In the wrong contexts, it’s terrifying. A friend of mine used to be big into Rush Limbaugh, and he decided to involve his wife in his passion. But she was a psychopath in general, and he became horrified at this terrifying right-wing beast he had created. He saw her general hatred and cruelty magnified in her political views.

[...]

Be as offended as you want, but how many women have you met who were bitter, aggressive, and antagonistic over their political views? Why would a woman want to turn into that? And how many more women than men have you met with that demeanor? Being married to a woman invested in politics or social theory is like being married to that one passive-aggressive co-worker who is best friends with the manager.

Today more women than men vote, especially single women, although married women vote more often than single women. Single women are more likely to vote Democrat than married women, and men are more likely to vote Republican than either of them. Whether it’s the financial support or the moral guidance of a husband, women tend to be right-wing when influenced by a man (hence why the left keeps trying to destroy the nuclear family).

And if you are a man who votes Democrat, then yes, you vote like a girl. And probably the kind of ugly girl no man wants to commit to instead of the young hot Presbyterian Sunday school teacher.

Part of the reason women tend to vote Democrat is because women are terrible with money and math. This is the same reason kids are taught in school to pursue their dream job instead of learning a trade that will provide a secure income.

Bad For The Family

Ultimate History Project writes,

One year later, on April 3, 1914, [Theodore Roosevelt’s cousin-in-law Kate] Roosevelt’s diary mentions Mrs. Martin speaking at the home of Mrs. Henry Seligman, wife of the millionaire banker…According to the Times, Mrs. Martin proceeded to tear to tatters the great new cause. The audience listened to her demolition of the suffrage movement “We are not merely against feminism, but for the family. We cannot reconcile feminism and the family. We hope to hear the sound of women’s feet, walking away from the factory and back to the home.”

Notice the idea of suffrage is connected to women in careers. Ideas do not exist in isolation. The barefoot and pregnant Catholic housewife with five children is a far happier person than the sulky feminist writer who retires to squeeze out a retarded child in her late 30s conceived through in vitro.

Women often don’t transition well from the office to the home, becoming bored and listless after being used to the high energy (and germophobic) environment of work. Furthermore, the reason feminist writers think careers are fulfilling is because writing feminist literature is fun. Most women (and men) don’t have careers—they have jobs where they work at the grocery store and hate life.

This claim that women’s entrance into politics and the workforce would destroy the family was not merely the anti-suffrage position. The suffragists themselves admitted that a war between the sexes was a major reason they wanted the right to vote.

[...]

If you look at history, democracy has rarely worked well. It is not rule by the majority but rule by the loudest. And who is louder than a woman? Who is more passionate? And when women follow others like lemmings, we see that women’s suffrage can quickly become destructive.

True, the monarch could be oppressive, take away your rights, censor speech, enact things that the most people are opposed to, and often make the common people miserable and impoverished. But how is that any different than modern western democracies? At least the monarch could accomplish things. Our government can’t get anything done except throw away money.

Furthermore, the monarch has the all-seeing God, his family legacy, and anxious nobles with small armies breathing down his neck to help make sure he does what’s best for the country. In the democracy, it’s greedy corporations and small minorities of activists who control the political narrative. Which is the lesser evil?

[...]

Progress

We have this idea as a society that we are constantly getting smarter with each generation. Yet if you read old books, you find that man has gradually become stupider over the centuries. Even just 100 years ago, people—both men and women—still had the common sense to not shoot themselves in the foot over women’s issues.

Today we have this sense of rights in general, like we are entitled by God at best and by Nothing at worst to have certain laws in place. Where God or Nothing promised this to us is beyond me.

The liberal atheist believes in these human rights more than anyone, even though he doesn’t believe in a god and therefore has no basis for his natural law philosophy. At the least it would make sense for him to believe in whatever is either the oldest or the most universal morality, but instead most atheists jump ahead to whatever new moral fad will fill the emptiness. Just because religion is the opium of the masses doesn’t mean mankind doesn’t need an opium.

The religious person isn’t any more off the hook. Nowhere in the Bible is tolerance, equality, or democracy mentioned, and I doubt they are very prevalent in other religions. The Bible doesn’t say much about politics, but one could make the best guess that while a king may or may not be appointed by God, a senator or president is clearly appointed by man, and therefore democracy isn’t Biblical.

Blair Naso, Return of Kings 22 Comments [4/11/2015 2:53:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
WTF?! || meh