Quote# 71305

My concern for level of pain of rape would be greater if it weren't for the fact that most American women deserve to raped because they oppose prostitution as a sexual outlet for men. Since they deserve to raped, I cannot concern myself with the pain rape causes them.

fschmidt, love-shy.com 246 Comments [3/4/2010 12:31:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 536
Submitted By: David
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128977

I would like to have someone do a news coverage for me. The issues of inceldom and female hypergamy need to be revealed to the masses. And if I don't get a girlfriend after that, I will go on a hunger strike. I will livestream my strike until a girl gives me the relationship I need. Surely the government has to step in right? Will they provide me a companion or what?

Gandhi did the hunger strikes and they were effective so why can't incels? Especially with modern tech, the news would spread faster. People from all over the world would be tuning in our live streams and maybe there's someone out there that would be willing to love and be intimate with us.

Insale, r/incels 14 Comments [7/7/2017 9:43:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125927

As readers here are well aware, all feminists are really interested in is preventing male sexual access to young, good looking females, and in so doing, raising their own pitiful sexual market value. They will seize upon isolated cases of sexual murder to push through legislation that further restricts the free sex market, whilst encouraging the import of millions of Islamic rapefugees in order to produce a genuine rape culture, as well as inevitable growing Muslim political influence, that will lead to young women dressing conservatively and fearful to go out alone.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 3 Comments [4/7/2017 7:15:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: xavier
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125630

" "Leave it to some dyke who calls herself “Marcus” to come gurgling the same bullshit we’ve all come to expect."

Have you ever heard of Marcus Aurelius? It’s a play on his name because I admire his philosophy, supergenius. And have you ever read any of my previous comments? Apparently not, because if you had, you’d know that I’ve never spouted any bullshit, nor towed any party lines. Nice ad hominem attack, though."

Oh no, I’ve never heard of Marcus Aurelius. Your oh-so-clever little wordplay totally escaped my notice. NOT!

You are a woman who models herself on a Roman philosopher, which is absurd. Do you know the origin of the word “virtue?” Do you think Aurelius would have seen some spoiled American woman with an inflated ego as the rightful heir to his ideas?

Pietas dictates that you should shut up in the presence of men and take your place as a woman. Or did you miss that part? How convenient, and how typically female to overlook the fundamentals…

Your presumptuous defilement of ancient, received wisdom only underscores the folly of attempting to give women equal status in the realm of thought.

Welmer, Chateau Heartiste 3 Comments [3/22/2017 8:31:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125402

You question why a man earning money for his family is vital for their respect and yet say you thought, at the time, that it was your husband's fault that you were in rough financial shape. It seems like your story is a case study as to why men should be the bread winners: it is very difficult for a wife to respect a man who performs the womanly role (likely poorly) of managing a household and taking care of children.

The reality is that for the vast majority of human history, romantic marriages have been the exception, not the norm. You might love your husband as a person. That makes sense, as you likely chose each other but I'm going to hazard a guess that you had the luxury to not have an arranged or very early (think: a 21 year and an 18 year old getting married after 3 months of closely chaperoned dating) marriage. For the other 95% of humanity, marriages have been economic arrangements primarily and personal arrangements eventually.

I'm happy to talk to you and have my theories and beliefs disproved and challenged, otherwise I wouldn't be here myself.

RP student , Reddit 11 Comments [3/14/2017 10:27:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 128823

That's because women don't know what they want and they're a bunch of dumb oblivious cunts. Giving them the right to vote or the right to anything was a dumbfuck idea in the first place. Can't wait for a Civil War II so I can start taking out cucky little blue-pillers and feminazi twatrags.

HPFNU_redcurve, r/incels 9 Comments [7/4/2017 8:24:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126385


Min Jap Hussein, Facebook 3 Comments [4/17/2017 1:12:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130418

Brutal story.

I went out running today, and silly me I forgot this is the middle of the afternoon on a hot sunny summer day. Why the fuck did I even show my face in public? Also I've said several times on this subreddit that I'm a muscular guy. I lift. I have a great body. I have abs, good arms. Just all around good proportions, but you will see why this is futile.

Anyway, what happened was while I was running who else but a couple of girls stopped their car at a stop light. They yelled at me saying stupid things to me while I was waiting the light to go green, and the girl in the passenger said, "Hey! You! You're not hot!" and I turn my head, and she goes "Yeah you're not hot!" And then the light turned green.

I then started running back home in a fit of anger. I wanted to just fucking run into traffic. I thought to myself what the fuck is the point of being muscular if you don't have face? Or height? It's fucking over. Being muscular means you are compensating for your lack of height or lack of your face if you aren't Chad.

Just LDAR. It's completely over. To all those fucktards saying "Just lift brah!!!!!!!!!" This is the true blackpill. Women don't give a fuck about muscles.

anincelforlifelol, r/incels 20 Comments [8/11/2017 12:29:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130706

Among the sweeping allegations of baatil made by a Dr. Hargey is his claim:

“Men and women have identical fundamental rights, with the Qur’an emphasising equality in the spiritual,intellectual, economic and legal areas.”

For this personal view of his, Dr. Hagey is unable to adduce any substantiation from the Qur’aan or Hadith. This view is at variance with the Shariah. Even a cursory glance at the teachings and proofs of the Shariah will establish the fallacy of this claim and make manifest that Dr. Hagey’s opinion is devoid of any Islamic credibility.

In the aforementioned statement, Dr. Hagey has made a sweeping claim without tendering the basis and proof for the claim which is couched in ambiguity. He speaks of “identical fundamental rights” without defining these. He should elaborate and expound his conception of “fundamental rights” so that the fallacy of his arguments in relation to the Shariah will become more vivid to Muslims. Ambiguity is always a cover behind which refuge is sought for unsubstantiated opinions and views.

It is quite a simple matter to launch an attack on the established institutions of Islam by means of high-sounding and ambiguous phrases. But, it is entirely a different matter to define, elaborate and substantiate such claims of baatil as are being traded under the name of islam. To enable us to comment further and in greater detail on this particular opinion of Dr. Hargey, it is necessary that he defines his understanding of “identical fundamental rights”.

In the second part of his claim (cited above), Dr. Hargey attempts to show that according to the Qur’aan men and women enjoy total equality in spiritual, intellectual, economic and legal areas. But, on the contrary the Qur’aan and the Sunnah refute this contention of equality of the sexes, an obsession with the modernists of our time. The following differences or Islamic differences between the sexes will conclusively assert the fallacy of Dr.Hargey’s view.

* According to the Shariah a woman can never be the Imaam in a congregation in which males are present. On the other hand, a man is always the Imaam in any type of congregation.

* If women happen to be performing Salaat in a jamaat in which men are, their position is right at the back–right behind the rows of children.

* When the Imaam in jamaat Salaat makes an error, his attention is drawn to the error my the muqtadis calling out “Subhaanallaah! But, it is not permissible for a woman who happens to be in the congregation to call out Subhaanallaah! to draw the attention of the Imaam. Her voice has to remain concealed.

* Nafl Salaat and Nafl Saum (Fasting) are acts of Ibaadat of very high merit. But, a woman is not permitted to resort to these acts of Ibaadat without the consent of her husband. On the contrary, her husband does not require her permission.

* A woman was never ever appointed a Nabi by Allah Ta’alla. This was the office exclusively of males.

* Juma’ Salaat is compulsory on men, but not on women.

* Eid Salaat is obligatory on men, but not on women.

* Taraaweeh Salaat is Sunnatul Muakkadah in Jamaat for men, but not for women. They are exhorted to perform individually at home.

* According to the Qur’aan Shareef the share of inheritance of a female is half that of the male.

* According to the Qur’aan the testimony (shahaadat) of two women is equivalent to that of one man.

* According to the Qur’aan men possess the right to discipline and punish women, even beating them when necessary while women have no reciprocal rights even if their husbands are in error.

* Men possess the right to administer divorce, not women. Women have no such right. Even khulah (the procedure whereby a woman buys her separation from her husband) is dependent on the acceptance of the husband.

* The husband is entitled to recall his wife after having given one or two talaaq even if the wife does not desire to be reconciled. It is his right to act unilaterily and retake her within the iddat period.

* The testimony of women is not admissable in crimes of the hudood category, e.g. theft, adultery. Even if a thousand pious, honourable and knowledgeable females bear testimony in such crimes, their evidence is not admissable.

These Islamic differences between man and woman are sufficient to highlight the fact that the Shariah distinguishes between the sexes, does not provide for identical rights for men and women and decrees the superiority of man over woman. These differences enumerated here will serve to indicate that the Shariah rejects the views and opinions of Dr.Hargey as blatantly baatil.

Dr. Hargey and other modernists of the same opinions should understand that to force equality between inequals is in fact reprehensible inequality, morally wrong and unjust. The Islamic inequality between man and woman is no insult to womankind. The glowing statements of the Shariah speaking highly of women negate any such charge which the enemies of Islam level.

In simple terms the lesser role lesser resporisibility and lesser rank to woman — a rank in subservience to men – all stem from the natural and inherent spiritual, physical and intellectual quality and condition of women. In these areas Allah Ta’ala has created in man dominance and in women subservience.

This state of affairs has been decreed by the Wisdom of Allah Ta’ala and the opinions of Dr. Hargey will not be able to alter the immutable realities created by Allah Ta’ala. Nor does the Ummah require or desire the personal opinions and views of doctors of philosophies, for the path and direction of the Ummah of Islam have already been fixed fourteen centuries ago. And that Path is the Path propagated by the Ulama-e-Haqq – the Path in which great emphasis is and will always be placed on “ritual and externals”, on dress codes” and codes of Islam which Hargey has branded as “empty observances”. May Allah Ta’ ala protect the Imaan of all Believers.

Hazrat Maulana Ahmad Sadeq Desai, Reliable Fatwas 0 Comments [8/18/2017 8:14:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 129161

[When the Taliban did nothing wrong to women]

In a deeply cynical ploy by feminist Tracy Clark-Flory, the endemic abuse of boys and use of male prostitutes in Afghanistan is being portrayed as a result of women’s oppression in this recent Salon piece. Although it is doubtless that Islam may play some role – in the context of Afghan culture – in the practice of “bacha-baz,” the idea that feminism is the solution to the abusive treatment of boys is either the result of deeply held ignorance or deliberate dishonesty. Male prostitution and pederasty have been a problem in the area for at least a couple hundred years, and probably far longer. Famed 19th century British explorer and secret agent Richard Francis Burton was tasked with investigating a male brothel in what is now Pakistan at one point, and wrote extensively about the practice, which led to spurious accusations that he was an avid participant himself.


Since that time much has changed, but Afghanistan is notoriously backward and resistant to change, so the practice has persisted despite reforms in the Islamic world. However – and this is very important where Clark-Flory’s article is concerned – the fundamentalist Muslim Taliban have made it a priority to stamp out bacha baz. It is not in the strictly fundamentalist parts of Afghanistan where the women are veiled and kept out of school that bacha-baz is practiced; it is found primarily in the north where the ethnic groups who are allied with NATO have control. Fundamentalist Islam is not so much a characteristic of Afghan culture as tribalism, but it has made inroads thanks to Arab fanatics filled with a missionary zeal and a desire to fight what they see as the godless “North,” which includes Russia along with what we call “The West.”

Furthermore, if we are to take an example closer to home, we could shine a light on the problem of pederasty in the Roman Catholic Church in the late 20th century — during which time liberal ideologies, including feminism, gained the upper hand in seminaries and parishes across the US, and then even Europe itself. The relaxation of tradition and the rise of feminist ideology in the Catholic Church occurred at the exact same time that the epidemic of pederasty did, which suggests a correlation between the two. So no, it is not “the patriarchy” that is raping boys. In fact, many of the rapist priests were notoriously “progressive” in their views and feted by wealthy liberals, some of whom doubtless were aware of their proclivities.

Unfortunately, most people are not all that well-informed, and may be susceptible to appeals to human decency. This is how feminism has gained so much ground: by usurping moral issues and proposing feminist policies as the solution. Even conservatives have fallen for these tactics, passing hardcore feminist legislation and enabling feminist radicals because they never took the time to study and get to the root of problems, preferring instead to blindly react to social problems with heavy-handed, ill-considered measures.

It is important that we keep an eye on feminist arguments to prevent them from making appeals to our sense of decency in an effort to fool us into giving them even more power and influence than they already have. As we know well, the situation has not improved for boys since the advent of feminism, and eliminating abuses such as pederasty are best achieved not by giving women more privileges, but by caring about the humanity of boys, which is not even remotely part of the feminist agenda.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 2 Comments [7/12/2017 9:23:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126214

Your videos are fuqin awesome and inparticular why women destroy nations!
I have been saying this same point for years!
Women are fickle and will gravitate to men who appear strong and have less group loyalty?

Captain Nemo, Youtube 6 Comments [4/11/2017 9:11:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126402

Hey non-incels: The concepts of leagues/looksmatch/lowering your standards are incompatible with the concept of romantic love

And I guarantee just about all of your turds believe in it.

I mean, how deep can this supposed "romantic love" be if people only qualify for each other based on the very thing that is most superficial and supposed to matter the least...one's appearance?

I thought "love was blind," idiots?
I thought "looks fade," idiots?

How can you possibly believe in that garbage, but then talk about how "'average' men can still get in relationships if they lower their staaaaaaaan-darrrrrrrds?"

I mean, if this mythical "romantic love" existed, why wouldn't incels and supermodels "fall in love with each other?" After all, there's no reason to separate people into different leagues on the basis of something as shallow as looks, now, is there?

TimRattayGotScrewed, /r/incels 16 Comments [4/17/2017 9:52:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126199

[Comment under "Normie fathers of daughters are pathetic"]

To all fathers who have daughters: understand that all females are filthy whores from birth, including your daughter. Your daughter wants to be plowed by Chad from the moment she learns about sex. She is a fucking degenerate and no amount of protection will keep her from being a degenerate. She was born one.

CheesyFedora, Reddit - r/Incels 11 Comments [4/11/2017 9:07:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 74530

Sheik Hilali, Australia's Mufti since 1989, was quoted as saying: "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the back yard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem."

He added: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab [Islamic headscarf], no problem would have occurred."

The Egyptian-born Sheik also appeared to refer to a series of notorious gang rapes in Sydney by a group of Lebanese Muslim men who received long prison sentences. He said there were women who "sway suggestively", and wore make-up and immodest dress, "and then you get a judge without mercy [who] gives you 65 years... but the problem all began with who?"

Sheik Taj Aldin al-Hilali, The Independent 113 Comments [7/21/2010 9:30:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 151
Submitted By: Malkyrian
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127372

25+ women don't EVER want to be seen without makeup outside.

And I've seen and approached attractive 30+ women. They have *even more* makeup on.

Life for a 25+ year old woman is an *ARMS RACE* between beauty/makeup/anti-aging products and the effects of sun and aging.

ChickenDippaz, bodybuilding.com 16 Comments [5/21/2017 9:57:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: xavier
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127173

"One ex of mine – when I mentioned that I prefer (always have actually) women to shave their pubes – said that that was peadophilia. I laughed and told her that she was nuts."

It is an interesting topic (if very controversial even for here) as to why men do seem to prefer women with shaved pussies (leaving aside the 70’s aberation).

The simplest explanation would indeed be that men are hardwired to prefer females at the very beginning of puberty (i.e the age most likely to be virgins AND fertile (and maiximum years of fertility ahead of them)).

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 17 Comments [5/16/2017 5:24:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 71363

[After all, there are a lot studies about the rapist striving for the humiliation of the victim and demonstrating his or her power over the victim.]

This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists.

fschmidt, love-shy.com 126 Comments [3/6/2010 2:08:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 190
Submitted By: David
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127965

[Source NSFW]
[Enveloping every brilliant Anscombe... is a dick-shaped Wittgensteinian shadow]

how fucking entertaining I find this is a clue to my identity at this point, who the fuck but me gets off to this. haaahaahaa history is filled with endless patriarchy no matter where you look

cantfightnature, Tumblr 5 Comments [6/9/2017 3:13:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130851

(final batch of comments from that motherf*cking thread (mostly to wrap up))

hearing your mom get dicked by chad

Have you called your mom out on it? Have you told your dad? Man thats fucking shitty. Women have no shame.

In Middle East, you should have had to kill your mother and that Chad to clean your honour. This is why you Western men are socially oppressed. You even can't listen your instincts.

Cheating with evidence is instant death if she was married but lashes for the guy if he was unmarried but if both were married then both need death.
Edit: also if both were unmarried then both get lashes if there is evidence.

Dude I'm from Turkey, Eastern Turks aka Kurds would kill that degenerate cunt in such a case very very most probably. I like their sharp patriarchal traditions. It's not totally Islamic, it's a social rule existing before Islam too.

Even for a normie this shit would be fucking repressed memory material, for incels it's even worse. It's one thing to cheat on someone, it's another to involve your own kid in it against their will. Can't imagine what you're going through, friend.

Jesus fucking Christ. One of the few positives of being middle eastern is not having a slut for a mom.

Hhahahah. here is a blackpill: i'm from a conservative middle eastern country

What the fuck? I am from a conservative middle eastern country as well so I'd like to know what country it is. I am genuinely baffled.

levantine raised in ksa

This is so fucked...
But I am glad I am blackpilled, I used to be a naive idiot that would have never suspected something like this. That said this is still surprising for me, the ride never ends.

What the fuck. How can you still respect your mother?

that is the least of it

please elaborate story.

too many stories and they're long, but she would go on vacation on my beta dad's dime and take me with her, she would introduce me to new guys there telling me they are family or family friends. she would book two rooms and hide that she booked a second one. she would go and fuck chad and then come into our room sweaty in her bath robe when done.

thats fucked up, i don't think i could look her in the eye again if she was my mom. wtf and ur father he is clueless as fuck. the fate of the beta cuck what pointless existence. just pain and humiliation.

This, also how recent was this and are your parents look-matched?

dad is ugly, mom is hot

i was younger, but fully capable of understanding what was going on

various incels, r/Incels 1 Comments [8/22/2017 5:43:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 130185

(Comment on this article: "The Woman Who Accidentally Started The Incel Movement")
What a load of hogwash. Maybe, just maybe, this woman coined the term but... 1) Incels have existed as long as humans have. She didn't start anything. 2) It says in the article that she had a lesbo girlfriend, therefore not an incel.

It's disgusting how they took a "special snowflake" lesbo story and tried to fob it off as an incel piece

SlayorOfWhiteKnights, /r/incels 2 Comments [8/10/2017 3:16:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh