Quote# 82034

(reacting to possible legalization of same-sex marriage in New York)

Last time I consulted an atlas, it is clear we are living in New York, in the United States of America – not in China or North Korea. In those countries, government presumes daily to “redefine” rights, relationships, values, and natural law. There, communiqués from the government can dictate the size of families, who lives and who dies, and what the very definition of "family" and "marriage" means. But, please, not here!

Our country’s founding principles speak of rights given by God, not invented by government, and certain noble values – life, home, family, marriage, children, faith – that are protected, not re-defined, by a state presuming omnipotence. Please, not here! We cherish true freedom, not as the license to do whatever we want, but the liberty to do what we ought; we acknowledge that not every desire, urge, want, or chic cause is automatically a "right." And, what about other rights, like that of a child to be raised in a family with a mom and a dad?

N.Y. Archbishop Timothy Dolan, Joe. My. God. 104 Comments [6/17/2011 3:28:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 97
Submitted By: Aspergus
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 135608

I had to pray before going to church, for God to help me have a pure mind at church, because of the problem of IMMODESTY IN THE CHURCH! If there's one place in the world brother, where you ought not have to struggle with lust because of inappropriately dressed women, it ought to be at church. Instead, churches today have become fashion shows to show off what you've got. Carnal women choose to showcase their flesh.

In case you weren't aware ladies, the Bible teaches that men are at war with the lusts of the flesh. You might want to remember that when you showoff your buttocks and thighs. 1st Peter 2:11, “Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul.” And this Scripture applies to women as well. I recently saw a laughable photo of Country singer Marty Stuart, an elderly man wearing painted-on black leather tights!!! Kenny Chesney is another pervert, who likes to attract homosexuals and whores at concerts with his skin-tight bluejeans. It is wickedness!!! Perhaps you say, “I don't like the way you're preaching!” We'll, neither does God like the way you're living! GET RIGHT WITH GOD!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 15 Comments [12/30/2017 11:29:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 131311

You know what to me is really irritating and infuriating?

We piss on mother nature all year long, for decades.

We say fuck you to her stealing her natural resources, and adding our own manufactured, superficial, processed, UN-NATURAL resources and we trash her over and over again. Only to become more dependent on unnatural resources.

Then, we freak out when we can't get our food at the markets, gas at the pump, our homes and belongings are destroyed and PLAY VICTIMS! I don't feel sorry for even 1 human being that loose their shit.

We piss on mother nature and then when she shows her natural state of chaos, we cry and moan about how will we survive. Well, mother naure does provide enough to survive but we destroy her survival tools.

So unless you need medical attention, nature provides natural water and food for you to survive. I will volunteer my services during the devastation of a storm to help people in need but i have CERO sympathy for humans during these things.

I only have sympathy for the children that really have no choice but get caught up in this nature of insanity called civilization. This is coming from a Floridian that just came back from a Supermarket!

Nazca, Godlike Productions 12 Comments [9/6/2017 12:27:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 28810

[manonfire struggles to answer the question of whether or not Anne Frank and Adolf Hitler both ended up in the same place according to Christian theology.]

Torquemada (former fundy): man, do you believe that Anne Frank and Adolf Hitler both went to the same place? Neither of them accepted Jesus as their personal savior....

manonfire: Come on, Torq! You should know that works doesn't get you into heaven. You have been preaching it for as long as I've known you. There is only one path to salvation, and you know what it is. I'm totally confused how you have done a 180 in such a short period of time!

I think you have played so many different roles on these message boards that you have lost touch with reality! I think you have lost touch with who you are. In psychology, it's called personality disorder. However, I will support you any way I can through this time of crisis in your life, in hopes of helping you get well.

[A poster who jokingly calls himself "YHWH" attempts to provoke an answer to the original question.]

YHWH: Hitler massacred millions of innocent people, and Anne Frank... er... lied once when she was eight years old and slapped an obnoxious schoolyard bully. Therefore, they were both sinners, deserving of eternal damnation.

manonfire: Well, I don't know for certain about Anne Frank. She may have accepted Jesus Christ on her death bed. But you are correct in that sin is sin in God's eyes. Sin is not what keeps you out of God's kingdom. It's not accepting Jesus Christ as your personal Saviour.

manonfire, AARM 26 Comments [9/9/2007 6:43:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 33080


The cure is to not be a faggot, to not use needles/drugs, and to not treat the women of ones own nation (people) as hoes. Keep it righteous. The only cure for America in nuclear fire.

Kephrem, Wu Tang Corp 54 Comments [1/2/2008 1:38:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 52016

[Protesters stand outside a Dallas church during a sermon titled "Why Gay is Not O.K."]

They were singing "Jesus Loves Me"

Yes, He surely does, but He does not Love the SIN they're living under of which he calls an abomination, and that they must be put to death. Lev. 20:13

What about this is hard to understand?

1Angel4u, Rapture Ready 45 Comments [11/12/2008 12:02:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: KatAutumn
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 136158

Judge Jack Robison appears to be channeling a higher authority recently in Comal County, Texas. Robison interrupted jurors during deliberations to inform the panel that God told him to acquit Gloria Romero-Perez of trafficking a teenage girl for sex. It appears that divine judgment did not track well with the jury, which proceeded to find Perez guilty as charged.

Perez was accused of paying $6,000 (£4,300) to smuggle ta 15-year-old girl to the US from Honduras. She then received money from an older man who had sex with the girl and had a child by her.

Obviously, if this account is true, Robison needs to be stripped from the bench. He was reelected as a Republican to the 207th District Court without opposition. His current term expires on December 31, 2018.
He received is B.A. from Missouri State University and his J.D. from St. Mary’s University of San Antonio. He was reprimanded in 2011 for jailing a grandfather who called him a fool for his ruling on the custody of the man’s granddaughter.

Judge Jack Robison, Jonathan turley 18 Comments [1/22/2018 6:32:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: JeanP
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 44209

Atheists complain about the converting of people?
Such as tribes around the world yet we have brought them to Jesus Christ and they have been saved. We have given them everlasting life instead of belief in false gods. Atheists don't understand the spiritual significance nor do they understand the importance of missionaries of the past and present.

We've delivered a few small cultures to everlasting life. How many people have you saved lately?

Lizbrownaus, Yahoo Answers 44 Comments [8/4/2008 1:48:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 112077

here you are. There you are! I knew it, I just knew one of you morally bankrupt Eugenics apologists would swim on by. And proving my point in a spectacular fashion, I might add, being so blind that you deny the very thing you support.

Let me tell you something that will likely go in one ear and out the other: Abortion is not a basic human right. I don’t know where you people pull that out of. Maybe it’s comes out of the asses your heads tend to be shoved inside. A fetus, an unborn human, is not part of the mother’s body. It is a separate human, with a unique set of DNA, a unique fingerprint, and a unique appearance. Yes, she is dependent on her mother for survival, just as any child is dependent on an adult for the same. For what is a womb but a place where the growing child gets food and shelter, just like a born child is dependent on his parents for the same. The only difference, the only difference, is time. Would you justify killing a toddler because he’s dependent on his parents for survival? By following your logic, you would. But then again, logical consistency was never the strong suit of the Pro-Choice movement.

Time does not matter when it comes to life. What right have you to kill a child because it is still developing? What right have you to declare that dependence on another is grounds upon which to kill someone? Unborn fucking birds get more goddamn protection from wanton killing than our own unborn children. Even nature shows us the value of the unborn for fucks sake!

And what twisted logic drives you to the conclusion that protecting an innocent life, even a “potential” one (if you want to be stubborn about the term), somehow gives a woman fewer rights than a corpse? Can you even read what you’re typing? A woman can’t terminate her child, so suddenly she’s worse off than dead people?? What the hell kind of logic is that? I’ll tell you what it is, It’s emotionally-contrived drivel. A false and pretentious non sequitur used to justify the murder of children by the thousands.

And congratulations for not reading my post. I never directly compared Abortion to the Holocaust, though perhaps the parallel isn’t that far fetched. I did, however, compare Eugenics to the Holocaust. You’re here, defending women who have murdered their unborn children for genetic reasons, which is the EXACT definition of Eugenics. Clearly, the fact that you’re here debating this tells me you embrace the logic that leads to it. Abortion for most other reasons is flat out murder, but justifying it on the basis of genetics takes to straight into Eugenics. The Holocaust was justified under the same Eugenic propaganda. Namely: This group or that group is genetically inferior and therefore less than human. Ergo, their legal rights are slim/non-existant.

Your last paragraph is the fucking linchpin. Magically, after 24-weeks, suddenly the “mass of tissue” is a person. Can you pinpoint for me the exact magical thing that one one-hundreth of a second prior to the 24th week disqualified it as a living being? As being alive? As having the basic human right to live? That’s a real basic human right for you. LIFE. And nothing trumps the right to life.

If it contains human DNA, it is a human, and therefore inherits the inalienable right to life from the moment that new set of DNA is formed. Mothers should take role models from nature, as every single species that I’m aware of goes to some lengths to preserve the life of their unborn. Even fucking ants do all they can to secure the safety of their fertilized eggs. What kind of twisted, evil creatures are you that you can’t even match the moral integrity of a fucking insect!?

You. Disgust. Me. You attempt to defend the undefendable twice over in your little post, while simultaneously denying the fact that you’re openly supporting the single most arrogant and destructive chain of logic ever created by mankind; that one group of humans is superior to another by virtue of uncontrollable circumstances.

Fuck you and your fascist, eugenic, murderous bullshit! I’m done with you. Go sit in a corner and contemplate how an ant is a better example of morality than you.

justanotherconservative, tumblr 39 Comments [8/21/2015 3:42:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 18397

I hate nature. I dont mind global warming, it is too cold now, besides after global warming is global cooling. Even the most radical global warmers say that humans may barely be effecting the earth but not sure because the earth goes on diff. paths every trillion yrs. or some crap.

70 degree weather in Chicago will not kill nobody. In charlotte we been below avg. except the past week. We hit All time record los about 6 times the past 2 months.In MID SEPTEMBER, or early october{ forgot date} it was in the TEENS with VERY COLD WIND chill and cooling radiation making it feel like the single digits. Worse of all I was at a race. are car got Ice on it.

Today and yesterday it was in the 70's in Charlotte. Usually it is in the high 40's, but the AVG. is 57 degrees for december. We been on the cool side. Are cold season is from Late JAN. through FEB.

Whatever that had to do with the topic, back to it.
No i am not eco-family. I hate the enviroment. I like 85- 100 degree weather. and I am not willing to pay Way more money to drive a car that runs off sugar, ir walk to school .

BCHS, Christian Forums 57 Comments [12/19/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: somnium
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 2335

[After someone explains the Strong Nuclear Force]Seems like a pretty good arguement to me. Like I said, gluons have never been observed, measured, or proven to exist. They were made up by Athiests to try to explain the phenomina of why the nuclei stay together. Gluons do not exist.

tacoman528, Christian Forums 8 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 95817

When Obama led the charge to strike down DADT, I said to my husband that this was a move toward changing the composition of the military from largely conservative to liberal (and loyal to him). As it stood, the military would not have been obedient to him should he want to utilize them for a nefarious purpose. I maintained that gays are so in-your-face about their sexual preferences, that it would drive away those who love the Lord. Soon after, we start seeing gay pics of military members here and there. Then we hear about a military-hosted "gay pride" event in (of all places) Kandahar, Afghanistan. In addition, I know of a man who was forcibly raped by a group of males and sodomized (Sodom and Gomorrah anyone?). Well, Obama got his change.

Unfortunately, they are not done with their change. Lately, Christians have come under attack in the military. A chaplain and Lt. Col. has been censored by the military and atheists are calling for him to be punished just because he used the phrase "no atheists in foxholes."

Folks, as a Christian and one who served in the Air Force under former President Reagan, I am appalled. I would have never believed that things could get this bad. The gays are being used as a tool in the belt of this administration to put Christians on notice. Once he purges the military, I have to wonder if he will go after churches. And he claims to be a Christian himself..? Thoughts..?

Eleora, Rapture Ready 35 Comments [8/4/2013 3:30:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: Robert
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 52138

I truthfully don't think you people (evolutionists) are thinking logically here at all.

For one thing, what happens to a pen when you throw it up into the air? Yes it has all this great trusted energy as its going up, but than it eventually comes crashing down.

The calculations for disorder done in the opening paragraphs of this forum suggest that the sun allows for more order. However I think that this is just an temporary illusion. In the long run (just like the pen) things become completely disordered and do not have any more energy to appear ordered. Such as water running upstream, or ice melting and crystallizing, metabolism, digestion, condensation, or a seed and an embryo.

These things are just temporary illusions. Thus in the overall scheme of things, they are becoming disorder.

Life (such as a seed or embryo) has only the exact amount of thrusting energy it needs to allow it to grow and serve its purpose. This "information" was ALREADY previously assigned to it in the blueprint of its DNA (assigned by the creator). There is no mechanism that shows us that DNA can evolve... meaning it has no available assigned energy left other than to procreate and pass on its genetic material. A living thing only has enough time and energy to be born, live and die.

Conclusion... Entropy is eventually closing in on all of us. The Universe tells us this! It is steadily loosing gas. This means less stars are being born and eventually the lights will all go out.

Additionally, the Human geno can only replicate offspring so many times before things go haywire. That is why we should not have kids with our brothers or sisters.

All these little technicalities concerning entropy or the labeled 2nd law of thermodynamics are just inconsistencies that serve for nothing. It serves no purpose in arguing about these technicalities especially when one opens their eyes and truly LOOKS - our resources are diminishing.

Anita, Pharyngula 46 Comments [11/12/2008 6:52:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Negentropyeater
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 111297

It's refreshing to hear honest researchers simply report on the data and candidly admit where the evidence appears to lead. But this honesty comes at a terrible price. You would think that the scientific arena would promote objectivity and serious consideration of all ideas. But that's not what we find. In fact, it's just the opposite. It is the goal of every researcher to get published. But in academia, peer review is used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication. And under this flawed system, the acceptance of a new find trumps its actual validity: "We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong." (Richard Horton, editor of the British medical journal The Lancet).

"The interposition of editors and reviewers between authors and readers may enable the intermediators to act as gatekeepers. Some sociologists of science argue that peer review makes the ability to publish susceptible to control by elites and to personal jealousy.The peer review process may suppress dissent against "mainstream" theories. Reviewers tend to be especially critical of conclusions that contradict their own views, and lenient towards those that match them. At the same time, established scientists are more likely than others to be sought out as referees, particularly by high-prestige journals/publishers. As a result, ideas that harmonize with the established experts' are more likely to see print and to appear in premier journals than are iconoclastic or revolutionary ones." (Wikipedia, "Peer Review," various sources, references 41-48.)

Under such restrictions, as you would expect, researchers are forced to go along if they want to get along. Otherwise their careers are over before they've even begun. And it is within this environment that for some bizarre reason intelligent design has been absolutely barred from all discussion.

Guillermo Gonzalez is one of the astrobiologists who co-wrote the book, "The Privileged Planet". He was an assistant professor in the department of physics and astronomy at Iowa State University. When I checked into his background a little deeper I was disappointed to learn (but certainly not surprised) that after publishing his views in the book that he co-authored, his tenure was subsequently denied by the university when it came due. "Academic tenure is primarily intended to guarantee the right to academic freedom: it protects teachers and researchers when they dissent from prevailing opinion, openly disagree with authorities of any sort, or spend time on unfashionable topics. Thus academic tenure is similar to the lifetime tenure that protects some judges from external pressure. Without job security, the scholarly community as a whole may experience pressure to favor noncontroversial lines of academic inquiry. The intent of tenure is to allow original ideas to be more likely to arise, by giving scholars the intellectual autonomy to investigate the problems and solutions as they see fit, and to report their honest conclusions." (Wikipedia). After many appeals he has since moved on and currently resides at Ball State University in Indiana as an assistant professor in the department of physics and astronomy.

Two years prior to his consideration for tenure, approximately 130 members of the faculty of Iowa State University signed a statement opposing "all attempts to represent Intelligent Design as a scientific endeavor." Similar statements were issued by faculty at the University of Northern Iowa and at the University of Iowa. A total of approximately 400 professors signed the three petitions. Here are a few of the statements made:

"Intelligent Design has become a significant issue in science education, and it has now established a presence, even if minimal, at Iowa State University. Accordingly, if you are concerned about the negative impact of Intelligent Design on the integrity of science and on our university, please consider signing the "Statement on Intelligent Design by Iowa State University Faculty" below. We, therefore, urge all faculty members to uphold the integrity of our university of "science and technology," convey to students and the general public the importance of methodological naturalism in science, and reject efforts to portray Intelligent Design as science."

Wow. Does that sound like objective scientists to anybody? Banding together to pre-emptively strike down any and all theory of intelligent design, regardless of evidence. A Creator is just too unthinkable for these "scientists" regardless of where the evidence leads. Even the TV show, Ancient Aliens, is more objective than this bunch and regularly exposes the ridiculously flawed version of history we are required to believe. They, too, however, have an unthinkable attitude toward God, and so attribute our creation and assistance to aliens. The responsibility for the overwhelming evidence for our design has to belong to someone, right?

How very strange that any honest research that leads to logical conclusions pointing to intelligent design should be such an affront to the establishment, and so, be discredited straightaway. Once upon a time we formed theories based on evidence. Today we force the "evidence" to fit the theory and discard what doesn't fit. This inexcusable bias and intolerance to truth is, alas, the reality of the "science" of today. Shameful. We really have to do our own homework and fully utilize the Internet. Mainstream channels are unreliable and you simply won't find the truth on T.V. Hats off to the folks who are risking everything by resisting these academic bullies, sacrificing promotions and careers to reach us with the facts.
We can make up our own minds from there.

The Last Trump, Christian News Network 21 Comments [7/30/2015 2:16:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 124637

I'm tired of seeing feminist cunts and bluepill fags tell us it's our personality.

If that was the case, then why do the assholes over at /r/theredpill get laid so frequently?

Either it's our persssssonalityyyyyyy or everyone who posts at /r/theredpill is a liar.

Pick one normiescum. Just fucking pick one and stay consistent.

NoHopeLeft25, /r/incels 21 Comments [2/18/2017 10:48:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 5358

A minister gave a speech on this recently and it was that that made me realise why i believed it. I believe the bible is Gods word because it says it is. I believe it is the ultimate truth etc because it says it is... I also believe the old testament to be the true inspired word of God because Jesus himself often quoted from many of the books... I believ the new testament to be inspired by God because Jesus said the spirit will lead us to all truth or something like that.

middo, Christian Forums 4 Comments [11/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 92116

You guys are all crazy and going to hell. What a shame because I have noticed that you all seem like good people. God was never a man. And you will never come close to ever measuring up to the dirt Jesus scrapped off his sandals when he walked the earth as a man. None of us ever will so how can you have the audacity to think that you can be "gods"? God is perfect, sinless. So was Jesus. That's why God sent him to die for our sins, then 3 days later he resurrected him. Joseph Smith was a clown who fooled a lot of people. God made us to glorify him. That is our purpose in life. When we die, those of us who followed Jesus' instructions, and teachings will get to heaven to glorify and worship God, NOT TO RULE PLANETS! Read the bible, the real bible, find some sense and repent. Hopefully not all of you will end up in the fire "where there will be crying and gnashing of teeth" for all eternity.

Laura, Mormon DNA 66 Comments [1/16/2013 4:39:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 37
Submitted By: Idan
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 96969

Who profited from available contraceptives ? Women or men ? It will be the latter. Sex without responsibility. And if woman got pregnant they could explained to be blamed and abortion was still illegal "you should have taken the pill, you daft hag !" and both sex outside marriage (for women only.. of course) let alone abortion carried a huge stigma and desperate women tried to have all sorts of illegal abortions. And the man.. freed of his responsibility got away with it more than before because then it would have ended up in a shotgun marriage.
Who profited from the new "beauty ideals ?" The fashion industry did.. leaving many insecure about their own looks and aspiring to ever more unrealistic looks.
Who benefited from the abolition of grading as based on ability and publishing what the best schools were ? The rich who moved in and who snatched the homes closest to the better schools, forcing the poor out.
Who benefited from the country culture ? Phonies like Warhol who made good money out of it ?
Who benefited from tearing down traditional neighbourhoods and building miles after miles of a new concrete jungle ? Entrepreneurs.
Who benefited from all the festivals ? Entrepreneurs.
Who benefited from the "live now, pay later"that the liberals came up with ? Well.. at the end of the day the banks since people got themselves in debt where a generation before the word debt was seen as a curse.

What the 1960s and liberalism have done is not liberating people: it's wanton destruction without providing a real alternative to the old world. It's quite the opposite of "liberation". DId the decolonisation liberate Africa btw ? Hardly.. some African areas were still relatively wealthy in the early 60s. By the 1970s they were dirt poor and in perpetual chaos all because of hasty decolonisations and a lack of common sense.

And you may not like to hear it but there it is ? Relaxed immigration laws ? And more women entering the workforce ? Who benefitted ? Industry did as wages could be slashed. In my grandfather's day (50s, early 60s) people earned a living wage enough to feed a family. Today both husband and wife have to work and their only just make ends meet.

Free Tristania, Nationstates 23 Comments [10/10/2013 3:36:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: Zyr
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 49979

My son, who is 15, has a school friend (same age, I believe) which he talks to and invites over frequently, and I am just fine with this. But recently I found out (from a parent) that this friend is gay.

The last thing I want is my son to be corrupted into homosexuality. Now my son has never given me reason to believe that he is gay, but it saddens me that I had to go to another parent for this information, instead of my son telling me. Plus, lately it seems that he has been distancing himself from me, so you can never be too careful.

So the last time the friend came over (a few days ago), I kindly asked him to leave my home. The friend complied, but needless to say my son was very frustrated with me. I told him that it was just something he'll understand when he gets older, and that he'll appreciate me doing this eventually. But despite this he was still angry (stubborn teenagers), but he'll come around eventually I hope. It's been a few days now and he still seems a little upset.

Do you think I did the right thing? We go to Church regularly, so I thought by now he'd know that homosexuality is a sin. What should I do if my son stays upset?

(Thank you for taking the time to read this! Normally if I have questions I go to websites such as Yahoo Answers, but I often notice that Christians are constantly persecuted there. It feels much better posting on a website like this among other Christians that I can trust, so any responses will be appreciated!)

[Read: I'll post on a biased website so I can get the answer I'd like.]

Reply With Quote

bless&believe, Rapture Ready 76 Comments [10/14/2008 8:56:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 17784

The N.I.V is a communist plot

Canadian Malcontent, JREF Forum 38 Comments [12/5/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh