dbznarutofan2008 #fundie

dbznarutofan2008 #fundie imdb.com

1: Just because it seems inconsistent to the logical mind doesn't mean it really is.Hilarious how you atheist tards seem to think the universe has to bow to your limited human logical understanding.How arrogant.

2: I think maybe liberal atheist tards can quit whining about barbarianism the day they stop calling women killing their unborn a choice.Until that time perhaps you should STFU

3: Oh of course the bible was changed,written by different people etc..all because the 'suits' told me so.You tards really will believe anything as long as the authoritarians tell you so eh?

guess you're not so different then us lowly ol dumb theists eh? :P

28 comments

old comment by UHM

1: Logic is based around human observations of the real world around them. Ancient civilisations like the Greeks might not have understood how a tree grows, but they did understand that the same tree could not exist and not exist at the same time. If you don't believe the rules of logic apply, you are dismissing the common sense that tells you not to run over a highway during rush hour.
2: How about you people shut up about killing murderers on less than solid evidence? How about you start campaigning to stop the drone program that has literally killed school children? How about you support gun control so your children won't be shot in school by a random psycho? How about you stop grinning happily everytime a gay person gets AIDS and call it "God's judgement"? Maybe some liberals are hypocrites, but they have a much shorter list of shortcomings than you sadistic twats.
3: Science=Authoritarianism? Is that what you are saying? There's being a skeptic and than there is being paranoid, guess what side you are on.

"guess you're not so different then us lowly ol dumb theists eh? :P"
We are all stupid, but some people are much more moronic than others.

old comment by Swede

1. We're not the ones who think the Universe has to bow to our limited imagination. We accept it as it is, and we want to know everything there is to know about it.

2. I'm a socialist atheist, not a liberal. You can quit whining about killing lumps of cells, when you have stopped promoting the death penalty. No, I won't shut up until everyone has access to safe and affordable contraceptives and abortions. The choice is also about choosing to KEEP a pregnancy, regardless of marital status, etc. Choice is all about having alternatives.

3. No authoritarians or 'suits' told me. I can read all the different versions myself, both on the net and IRL. I can read the Bible itself, and see that each book is in a different style (if it's written by one being, he's got severe multiple personality disorder). I can go to museums and read the original Hebrew, Latin and Greek manuscripts (I won't understand much of the Greek and none of the Hebrew, but they ARE there). What did you pastor (i.e. authoritarian) tell you, dearie?

Oh, I'm definitely different THAN you, you ignorant fool. I know many intelligent theists, but you're not one of them.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"guess you're not so different then us lowly ol dumb theists eh? :P "

Yes, that's nice dear...:

(*Performs 'Patronise You no Jutsu': pats dbznarutofan2008 on head OVER 9000 times*)

image

And the title of that particular thread this quote comes from is extremely telling (especially the forum it originates in): 'I really I hope this movie doesn't tank because of prejudicing atheists"

Oh, y'think so?! [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Almighty

Budget $81 million
Box office $484,592,874

As opposed to, say... the sequel:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Almighty

Budget $175 million
Box office $173,418,781

Now, little Narutard: Can you do the maths? I can. The original Jim Carrey film was more of a 'What If': as in 'What would you do if you were God?' It made nearly six times it's expenditure, profiting greatly. The sequel - more heavy on the religious, Biblical aspects - didn't even return on it's (very large) budget; 'Tank'? It became one of the biggest bombs next to "Waterworld". Now, what was the title of that forum thread again, o Narutard...?!

Don't count on bookmakers such as William Hill or Paddy Power taking bets on "Noah" being a 'success'. I refer you to "Evan Almighty". The Atheistic cinemagoers aren't as 'tard-ed' - certainly 'dumb' - as you think... oh yeah, that's right: you don't think. Period.

I can confidently predict that not even the 'Ark' built for "Evan Almighty" will be able to save Russell & co. when that film equally sinks; you'll certainly need Kevin Costner to save the credibility of you Bibliotards, 'faith'-wise. One word: Perception. >:D

@Mister Spak

'liberal atheist tards'

So sayeth the Narutard.

He's gonna need a lot of Mirror Polish, eh?

old comment by fmitchell

The supreme irony is that this guy condemning us for our ignorance and gullibility is merely parroting what his pastor/minister/preacher/snake-handler said.

1. Shockingly, the scientific method has conquered many concrete problems that stumped the theological mind.

2. Human embryos are little different from chicken embryos for their first several weeks (so don't eat eggs, you murderer!).

3. A preponderance of Biblical scholars, religious and not, can point to textual and historical evidence that the books of the Bible were written by different people at different times, and only assembled into one book in the 4th(?) century at the Council of Nicea.

@#1610098, Swede

I've always said "different from", Britons usually say "different to", and people on the West Coast apparently say "different than". It's a regional thing, I think. There's no One True English.

old comment by UHM

@Swede: "Choice is all about having alternatives."
Exactly. And social democrats or socialists like us will argue that part of having the alternative is also economic stability if you decide to keep said baby, ergo wellfare, kindergarten places and nannies. Unsuprisingly, the international statistics on abortion rate (abortion/1000 women between the age of 15 and 44) in countries were abortion is legal support this argument - together with comprehensive sex education:
The US has an AR of 20.8, Sweden 20.2 and the UK 17. On the other end of the spectrum are Austria 1.3 (!), Belgium 7.5 and Germany 7.8.
Welfare expenditure of the GDP in 2012: US 19.4, Sweden 38.2, UK 25.9, Austria 32.4, Belgium 32.7 and Germany 33.2.

There is of course also culture to consider, but it seems one of the best ways to limit abortions are to make the possible future mother feel supported by a socialy responsible society and not one were you can't turn on the TV without hearing a long-winded version of "Fuck the poor."

old comment by Hasan Prishtina

1. The point is not to think we have all the answers, but to understand how much we don't know. Fundamentalists fall firmly into the first camp.
2. I don't call making women suffer death because they have to give birth to a fetus that will kill them civilized. Nor do I think jailing women for miscarrying or bearing a stillborn baby civilized, either.
3. The "suits" are theologians and other scholars who've spent their lives learning the languages and civilizations of the Bible and, if they discover they are wrong, change their opinions. Authoritarians, on the other hand, tell you there's only one truth, theirs, which is valid for ever, no matter what the evidence says. Again, that sounds like fundamentalism to me.

old comment by Canadiest

1: We don't think that, we don't even seem to think that. We seem to pay more attention to scientific discovery then Christians but at 56 I can state confidently what I know about the Universe before I die will be diddily squat squared.

2; I usually stay away from the Abortion question except to state this: It's legal, controlled by law and the last thing that should influence any changes to laws is the Barbarous backward superstitious nonsense of the church. Might be different if you could show you have a higher moral ground but you can't.

3; The "suits" in this case have Biblical/Torah scholars in their ranks and are in agreement with secular historians who specialize in myths. The Bible books are the works of many men and many are built from previous books. Many of the oldest books (and the Jesus story)have much in common with Sumerian, Egyptian and Babylonian myths.

At any rate I'm not giving one second of time to what an Evangalist, Baptist or Mormon has to say about Biblical history as they've all proven to know as little about the book itself as their flocks. I think you buy a teachers edition of the Bible and wing it down South encorperating American ego-tripping into as many verses as you can.

"guess you're not so different then us lowly ol dumb theists eh? :P"

One major difference, Atheist don't accept an unproven God from unproven claims from a book because a church says you must.

dbznarutofan2008 #fundie imdb.com

28 comments

Confused?