[Thread: "Ethnic cleansing of the English"]
in my own opinion,i think that the reason for the englisc ethnic cleansing is because the musslims,blacks etc.are scared of the englisc.so are other none Germanic countries(Obama ass has bascicaaly spit on the relationship between England and America).so what are theses goverments and other races afraid of?its simple,the ENGLISC ARE THE BULIDERS OF NATIONS.if it where not for the englisc there would be no usa,or austrillia and other countries in the anglosphere..the englisc have been fighting and whooping ass sense day one.and that scare goverments and also other races.......just my 2 cents.
35 comments
Two cents is really not worth much these days, is it?
Started with a tautology and got worse after that.
"if it where not for the englisc there would be no usa,or austrillia and other countries in the anglosphere"
@LDM: It's supposed to be a more native writing of the word "English". Apparently sound shifts are racial-mixing or something.
UHM:
The /sk/ to /?/ sound shift had already occurred at the time the Anglo-Saxons started using the Latin alphabet (it was imported from Ireland in the 9th century). Between the importation of the Latin alphabet and the Norman invasion, the spelling <sc> was used for the /?/ (ModE <sh>) sound in Old English.
These racist muppets, loathing as they do the Normans, have decreed that their "racial" identity should be spelled "Englisc" as a gesture of defiance against the French oppressor. (That the Dukes of Normandy were descended from a man called Hrolfr has apparently escaped their notice.)
UHM:
The /sk/ to /?/ sound shift had already occurred at the time the Anglo-Saxons started using the Latin alphabet (it was imported from Ireland in the 9th century). Between the importation of the Latin alphabet and the Norman invasion, the spelling <sc> was used for the /?/ (ModE <sh>) sound in Old English.
These racist muppets, loathing as they do the Normans, have decreed that their "racial" identity should be spelled "Englisc" as a gesture of defiance against the French oppressor. (That the Dukes of Normandy were descended from a man called Hrolfr has apparently escaped their notice.)
I'm very thankful for this comment.
Without it, I never would have googled "englisc", and discovered that there is an Old English version of wikipedia.
"simple,the ENGLISC ARE THE BULIDERS OF NATIONS.
Clearly, they are not the 'buliders' of legible prose.
The Normans were of Scandinavian stock, therefore whiter than your flash-in-the-pan "Englisc." Neener neener. Also, Celts and Gaels still have a living language, while Old English is kaput.
@1574087
why are you typing it in the Latin alphabet? It should be ??????.
If tjlowery wants to be a proper Englisc-man, he would use runes, the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc specifically.
No more Latin alphabet for you, tjlowery87!
From now on you must use these...image
@Doubting Thomas
He also seems to fear proper punctuation, capitalization, and spacing.
the ENGLISC ARE THE BULIDERS OF NATIONS.if it where not for the englisc there would be no usa,or austrillia and other countries in the anglosphere
Err... no, back in the day, the "Englisc" were too busy fighting off the Danes to worry about building any nations. The Anglosphere didn't exist during the Viking era. [/snark].
This might interest you. >:D, XD
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danelaw
Ok, now we have the explanation for 'englisc', can someone run through why the problems with 'buliders' 'bascicaaly', punctuation and grammar are somehow part of its 'cultural heritage'?
Your two cents aren't just worthless, they have negative value.
You now owe me a dollar, asshole.
"Hi, there! I'm tjlowery87, an guy who can't spell the word 'English' correctly because I'm a huge moron!"
I know these EDL-types think they're so "authentic" with their "ancient spellings" but it just looks stupid.
"Hi, I'm an authentic American, hence my spelling 'Congress' with two Fs....I think those are 'Fs', right? 'Congreff'?"....only for one to retort in some other tongue, like Sequoia, Hopi or Lakota.
"Just my 2 cents."
And worth every penny.
What is with their "Englisc" misspelling? Shouldn't it be "English?"
in my own opinion,i think that the reason for the afrikan ethnic cleansing is because the musslims,whites etc.are scared of the afrikans.so are other none Afrikan countries(Reagan ass has bascicaaly spit on the relationship between South Afrika under Mandela and America).so what are theses goverments and other races afraid of?its simple,the AFRIKANS ARE THE BULIDERS OF HUMANITY.if it where not for the afrikans there would be no usa,or britain and other countries in the world..the afrikans have been the first people sense day one.and that scare goverments and also other races.......just my 2 cents.
Oh, I see. "Englisc" is like the black supremacists' "Afrika."
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
