"I was thinking"
'Was?!'
image
[/Spartan Laconic Wit]
"it seems plausible; could large dinosaurs have been employed to move the massive stones required to build the pyramids?"
Better sit down, cunt-tit-joy5, as what I'm about to say may traumatise you:
"The Flintstones" is not a documentary.
As for said stones being moved, it was down to pure human manpower (specifically stones on sledges dragged by ropes; the runners periodically lubricated with water to make such movement a little easier).
'Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry'? I'm sorry, but I think your department needs more funding, to be considered a credible ministry. Considering the priority in funding goes like this: Health, Social Security, Defence, etc, etc, even your dept. is way below the spending hierarchy than the Ministry of Silly Walks! [/Monty Python] And as for 'Research'...:
image
Anything you say is a sad apology for what's supposed to pass for facts. And I'm not sorry to tell you that. Otherwise, this is your current location, CARM:
image
Facts destroy 'faith'. One word: Evidence.
...oh, and despite what the Bible says (Moses, and all that jazz), there's very little (if any) evidence that the ancient Egyptians used slaves, least of all for construction of the pyramids/temples, but there is much archaeological evidence to suggest that they brought in the agricultural workers during the flooding of the Nile (who wouldn't be able to work the land, natch) - a form of 'National Service', if you will - for the construction of such. They were paid in shelter, food and beer (with the mini-cities that sprang up near the construction site providing educational facilities for the families' children; the wives prepared the workers' meals, and there were medical facilities too. These became centres of culture in their own right). Thus the pharaoh had his pyramids/temples built, and the people he ruled who built such were assured their own place in the afterlife.
The more you know.