"Tell me exactly how you prove that a fish came out of water? How did it "know" it needed legs? How did it change its entire genetic structures and break all? the laws of genetics? How did it grow lungs. This is an utter logical fallacy. The only way for a fish to be able to breath air is if it was born that way."
How do you account for Mudskippers? And Coelacanth? Seems they evolved from the likes of Tiktaalik, the transitional form between fish and amphibians. Just as birds evolved from reptiles, via the transitional form of Archaeopteryx.
And early hominids - ultimately becoming Homo Sapiens - evolved from the transitional form of Darwinius masillae, the 'Missing Link' found earlier this year.
I'm afraid Creationism is looking less and less credible as the years go by and the gaps are filled. And you know what happens to gods once gaps are filled, don't you? Just ask Amun-Ra, Zeus and Jupiter: who worships them any more?
And frankly, it didn't really need Kitzmiller vs. Dover to destroy Intelligent Design (although it helps!). No, there's just one species that in itself completely fucks up ID, Genesis, or whatever - the Duck-billed Platypus. If your 'God' supposedly 'created' every living thing on this planet, then the Platypus proves one of two things: either God was on industrial-strength halucinogens to have come up with this animal, or it proves that God doesn't exist.
The Platypus is Genesis's logical fallacy. Thus the religion of Creationdelusionism. You can't explain how this species could have been created by a perfect, infallible God, yet you believe so?