"THE GLOBAL DARWINIST DICTATORSHIP MUST APOLOGIZE TO THE ENTIRE WORLD;"
Okay.
"- For CONCEALING FOSSILS unearthed from below the ground,"
I'm sorry you've never been to a museum, where these 'concealed' fossils are on display. Or never looked on-line at all the 'concealed' fossils that are for sale.
"- For keeping 100 MILLION FOSSILS, that have remained unchanged for millions of years, hidden away from the public eye,"
I'm sorry we haven't found those 100 million fossils you so desperately need to validate your superstitious beliefs. And I'm sorry that you mistakenly believe that such a set of fossils would pose the slightest problem to the theory of evolution when 'living fossils' such as the coelacanths and horseshoe crabs do not.
"- For never admitting they have NOT EVEN A SINGLE INTERMEDIATE FORM FOSSIL,"
I'm sorry that you would require someone else to lie to set your mind at ease. It must be very troubling for you that reality does not conform to your expectations.
"- For concealing for years the fact that IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR PROTEINS TO FORM BY CHANCE,"
I'm sorry that you think that proteins formed by chance, an education is a wonderful thing and it is a pity that you missed out.
"For FABRICATING FAKE SKULLS and producing them as evidence of the imaginary evolution of man,"
I'm sorry that you must resort to libel in order to pretend your views have value. Within your own belief system, false witness has serious consequences, I'm sorry you feel you must risk incurring them.
"- For portraying the Piltdown Man hoax, MADE BY ADDING AN ORANGUTAN JAW TO A HUMAN CRANIUM and filing down its teeth, as an intermediate form and for deceiving people by exhibiting it in a museum as alleged evidence of evolution for the next 40 years,"
I'm sorry you don't understand that Piltdown man was detected and exposed as a fraud by scientists who noticed it had become increasingly out of sequence with the story told us by other fossil hominids.
I'm sorry you don't realise that this completely contradicts your earlier points about suppressing evidence. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
"- For inventing the hoax intermediate Nebraska Man FROM A SINGLE WILD PIG TOOTH, producing false reconstructions to give people the impression that such a being had ever existed, and deceiving them still further BY PRODUCING PICTURES OF THIS NON-EXISTENT ENTITY’S WHOLE FAMILY,"
I'm sorry you mistake the imaginings of journalists as 'scientific pronouncements'. The output of Weekly World News must be very confusing for you.
"- For the way they for years depicted Haeckel’s FORGED EMBRYO DRAWINGS, produced with the aim of proving the lie that human embryos possess gills, as evidence for evolution,"
I'm sorry your sources are so out of date. Many modern textbooks show an analogous series to Haeckel's made from actual photographs. And yes, the photos still show structures (pharangeal pouches) resembling 'gills', sorry.
"- For the way they are still displaying THE SEQUENCE FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE HORSE, WHICH EVEN THEY ADMIT TO BE FALSE, in museums,"
I'm sorry there is not room in most museums to show the full evolutionary tree from Eohippus to Equus, it's fascinating. I'm sorry that you can't see that given the necessity of presenting an overview, admitting to such is a sign of scientific honesty.
"- For dishonestly depicting moths THEY GLUED ONTO TREE TRUNKS as “industrial revolution moths that had evolved by way of natural selection,”"
I'm sorry you can't tell the difference between a picture taken for illustrative purposes and an experiment. It must be very confusing for you when you look in a guide to garden plants and wonder how all those flowers grew when they were not attached to stalks.
"- For depicting the Coelacanth, WHICH STILL LIVES IN DEEP SEA WATERS TODAY, as an intermediate form,"
I'm sorry that you don't understand science. Coelocanths were once considered a probable step from fish to amphibians because of certain similarities to tetrapods not shared by lungfish. The capture of live coelacanths was a wonderful opportunity to test our hypothesis. In fact neither lung fish nor coelacanths seem to have a distinctively closer relationship with tetrapods (Naoko Takezaki, Felipe Figueroa, et al. - Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1512-1524 (2004)) and it seems likely that the three groups diverged from each other at about the same time.
"- For CONCEALING fossils of complex life forms dating back to the Cambrian Period FOR NO LESS THAN 70 YEARS, out of concern these would totally discredit evolution,"
I'm sorry you think the Cambrian explosion somehow falsifies evolution, and that you image the Burgess Shale finds were concealed by scientists when in fact it was scientists that recovered and discovered them.
"- For ADDING FEATHERS TO FOSSIL DINOSAURS and trying to pass this off as an intermediate form when they were unable to find any genuine intermediate form fossils to prove Darwinism,"
I'm sorry you are ignorant of the many fossil archaeopteryx that disprove your assertion so completely, they are really amazing things to look at. As for Archaeoraptor, I'm sorry you can't tell the difference between a greedy fraudster and a scientist, or National Geographic and the scientific literature. It must be very hard for you to function day-to-day, being such a poor judge of people. I'm sorry you didn't know that it was scientists who detected and exposed this fraud as it makes you look ridiculous for claiming they were deceitful.
"- For persisting in the FRAUD THAT LIFE FORMS GRADUALLY EVOLVED FROM THE PRIMITIVE TO THE MORE ADVANCED, even though they know perfectly well that the first organisms with characteristics of a similar complexity to those of present-day life forms appeared suddenly and simultaneously in the Cambrian Period, some 530 million years ago,"
I'm sorry that you believe evolution is some sort of "ladder to perfection". That is a very outdated concept and it is a shame you have not had time to catch up with the last century of evolutionary thought. I'm sorry that you think Cambrian fossils had placentas, fur, lungs, wings and other 'recent' developments. That all complex organs from the Cambrian era can be found today does not prove your point, that innumerable complex organs of today did not exist in the Cambrian era disproves it.
"- For portraying mutation experiments as evidence for evolution, despite knowing full well that mutations do nothing but harm organisms, and for years reiterating THE LIE THAT MUTATIONS LEAD TO EVOLUTION,"
I'm sorry that you think that bacteria aren't antibiotic resistant, that quinine is still a good treatment for malaria, etc. You must get sick a lot. I'm sorry that you don't know that most mutations are in fact neutral, or that studies of 'gut-bug' E.coli have demonstrated that only about 1/15th of new mutations actually changed the function of anything, and that 1/10th of those functional changes allowed the host to out compete its rivals, i.e. were advantageous. It must be very depressing to be outsmarted by a test-tube full of bugs.
"- And for so long teaching students in all schools and universities the deception that “chance causes evolution” AS A SCIENTIFIC FACT."
I'm sorry you didn't get the chance to actually go to university, perhaps if you had studied harder. If you had you would have known that they don't, in fact, teach that things evolve by chance, but by a number of mechanisms, but principally natural selection. Of course, if you take the wider definition of evolution to be change of allele frequencies in a population over time that it it is obvious that the odds of exactly the same frequency of all alleles persisting from one generation to the next is vanishingly small. So in this case evolution could be caused purely by chance.
Finally, I am sorry you are a fundtard. It is apparently an incurable condition since it has long since evolved resistance to the normal methods of treatment (information, education, large doses of reality, etc.). The best we can hope for is that you will not infect others with your condition, unfortunately - being a fundtard - it is unlikely we will get your cooperation with that.