Why is it that science gets away on ideas and theory with out any real proof
Such as? While it is true that the transition from a "scientific theory" to "scientific fact" may take years, even decades at times, it is never, at any time, considered above and beyond rational and learned criticism. The reason for this transitional period is simply that this universe is immense, and us humans are tiny and insignificant by comparison, hence it takes many minds over many years to carve the truth out of the rock of raw observation and conjecture.
Arcealogys dug up a seal of the prince that put the prophet Jeremiah down the well.
But that only proves the existence of this prince, even if it is specifically stated upon this seal that the prince put a fellow named Jeremiah down the well, who is the same guy from the Christian Bible.
Ancient Greek wrote about the beheading of John the Baptist.
Which may, at best, prove that a person named "John the baptist" was executed in those times. How can such an event prove the legitimacy of the text that is, in present times, excepted as "The Bible".
There have been so many things that prove the Bible is historically accurate.
Sadly, the two that you mentioned certainly weren't the ones.
Would you believe if you saw a miracle
"A miracle" is nothing more than a buzzword from the dark ages for the observation of unexplained phenomenon by the intellectually lazy.