Now, I want to get one thing straight.
Sure, he's a fundie moron, but for fuck's sake, you can't fire the bastard just because he handed out a few Chick tracts. That's not fair.
All they have to do is put them in the bin if they don't like them, right?
As an aside, why don't I imagine them doing this to Muslims? Or, why can I see us getting angry that a Muslim was unfairly treted for basic freedom of speech, but not for a Christian?
If you ask me, it seems that they genuinely were sacking him becuase of his religion, not becuase of his time-wasting; no-one would fire you for slacking (a little) the first time, not unless they were some complete asshole.
Chirsitains do seem to get more frag than Muslims. And it's fucking idiotic morons such as yourselves that give the rest of the atheists and agnostics a bad name.
Dawkins is impartial, so why can't you lot be? I mean, if we're going to slag off one religious group, we should do it to the rest :p
--
EDIT: Yeah, sure, if he started THRUSTING them into people's faces, that'd be different. But did he? And, what if it was in the lunch hour?
Some supervisors are really assholes - and I know; MINE is a Scientologist.