Quote# 36371

"Its a slippery slope, when you start legitimizing sexual perversions in culture, where will it end? there are women who have sex with dogs. So what will be next, animal human marriages? Will animal-human sex be the next thing they want legalized?! and what about the whole NAMBLA/LGBT thing? and after that pedophilia/pederasty rights?! NO! stop it now!"

"look up pederasty on wikipedia, its totally sanctioned by the LGBT! its even a LGBT portal!"

TimothyRed1990, YouTube 46 Comments [3/17/2008 3:20:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom


Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason.

3/17/2008 3:21:36 PM

Seamus D


3/17/2008 3:36:26 PM


Your Google search archive would make an interesting read.

3/17/2008 3:40:11 PM


3/17/2008 3:44:04 PM

Jake Steel

Five bucks says this guy is also a rape apologist judging by how the concept of consent seems to be lost on him.

3/17/2008 3:48:00 PM


what a total fuckin loon

3/17/2008 3:48:27 PM


Judging by his user name, we have another eloquent teenage fundie on our hands. I mean,

"stop it now!"


3/17/2008 3:57:18 PM


No, THAT'S a slippery slope.

3/17/2008 4:04:41 PM


that's a FALLACIOUS slippery slope.

Informed consent, BITCH.

3/17/2008 4:08:05 PM

Dr. Quasius

I like how you lump NAMBLA and LGBT in together. Because they are totally the same thing.


3/17/2008 4:21:13 PM


OMG. There are women who have sex with MEN. What's next? Sex with animals? And then where does that lead? Sex with clowns, potted plants, old sneakers, ham sandwiches, and WORSE.

Outlaw heterosex before our society collapses on itself!

3/17/2008 4:23:26 PM

We've been in Wikipedia. They have disavowed NAMBLA since the sixties(and it doesn't work since the nineties at least, according to the same source). Ok, which part of CONSENTING ADULTS you don't understand?

3/17/2008 4:25:16 PM

Grand Archblasphemer of York

The whole slippery slope argument forgets to acknowledge the fact that the reason why gay marriage should be legalized is because it is a union between two CONSENTING ADULTS! Animals cannot consent, and children are not adults. Gay relationships are consistent with the relationships we are already acquainted with and that we acknowledge, bestiality and pedophilia are not (for the reason that it is animal abuse and taking advantage of innocent and naive children respectively, causing possible harm for beyond what could possibly occur in a homosexual relationship confined to the nature of sexual activity alone...).

3/17/2008 4:31:18 PM


Slippery slope?

1. If a perversion is between two consenting adults its not a perversion. People have a wide variety of fetishes because they are people.

2. Animals do not have the same legal rights as humans. They are not regarded as being capable of giving consent since they are animals. I would happily eat a dog should my life depend on it. I am a lot less likely to eat a human under similar circumstances. People who have sex with animals are not going to marry animals. Because animals cannot give consent. However should we bring in intelligent aliens then we would allow it.

3. Pedarasty is illegal in most countries. We are trying to differentiate between a relationship and abuse. If a 14 year old boy (sexually mature since I was sleeping with girls by this age) decided to pursue a relationship with a 18 year old boy a distinction should be made. Voluntary sex is different from involuntary sex. For example the netherlands has a clause where parental knowledge is important. I.e its not statutory rape.

3/17/2008 4:35:30 PM

Mister Spak

Its a slippery slope, when you start legitimizing fundieism in culture, where will it end? It will end with hanging women for being raped.

3/17/2008 4:39:02 PM


And of course, as everyone knows, Canada has ceased to exist as a country since thumbing their nose at God and allowing gay marriages.
Oh. Wait. No it hasn't.
Mind you those laws against bestiality and pederasty/pedophilia are still in place.

3/17/2008 4:41:03 PM


Yeah. I did look it up. Turns out that LGBT doesn't support it.

3/17/2008 5:06:38 PM


Sex with dogs is completely legal, just looked down on.

3/17/2008 5:43:02 PM


Yeah, I bet if they let 'dem negros start marrying white women what next, gorillas can marry women?

Where does it end?!

3/17/2008 5:54:49 PM

Doctor Whom

No LGBT organization with which I've ever been involved has tried to protect people caught in kiddy fiddling. Now, certain churches, on the other hand ....

3/17/2008 6:10:41 PM


3/17/2008 6:14:13 PM


Kids, sniffing lighter fluid is bad. See exhibit A above.

3/17/2008 6:39:30 PM

Just because the pederasty article is a "LGBT portal" on Wikipedia doesn't mean that the LGBT community supports it. It just means that Wikipedia considers it part of that category.

3/17/2008 6:49:15 PM

Old Viking

I once had sex with an attractive privet hedge. It was an interesting experience, but I wouldn't do it again.

3/17/2008 6:58:25 PM

Septic Sceptic

The wiki article on racism has a link to genetics. Are we to infer that genetics is a racist field?

3/17/2008 7:47:35 PM

1 2 | top: comments page