There is much scientific evidence of a world-wide flood. You can't ignore the evidence.
[2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Text formatting help
I'm not a spambot
I can since all that evidence has been refuted by real scientists.
7/24/2008 9:22:56 PM
I don't ignore the evidence that actually exists. That your flood never happened
7/24/2008 9:50:02 PM
Evidence? Bigfoot has more evidence than your magic flood.
7/24/2008 9:53:32 PM
No, but you can.
4/21/2009 5:58:53 AM
Different preachers saying that the flood happened, that does not constitute scientific evidence. Out here in the real world we need tangible evidence, contemporary finds on several continents.
4/21/2009 7:00:51 AM
Ok, show us.
4/21/2009 8:21:14 AM
That's right, you can't ignore the evidence. Especially if none is presented.
Please, what is all this evidence for a "global flood"? Is it "Waterworld"? Did a Kevin Costner movie inspire this? Because, right now, I'm going to tell you, that Costner movies are not scientific evidence.
Simply put, there isn't enough water on Earth to flood the planet. If the icecaps melted to nothing, is all the rivers, lakes, tributaries and whatnot pooled into one place, if every cloud in the sky came down and the very moisture in the air condensed, there still would not be enough water to flood the entire planet. What you are suggesting is not science. It is magic. And that is the crux of your religion. You believe in magic, and call it "God".
4/1/2011 7:15:36 PM
Oh really? My rebuttal:
You can't ignore the evidence. My argument is Zeppelin. Q.E.D.
I rest my case.
8/6/2011 12:45:48 AM
But you can ignore the evidence which repeatedly has shown that such an event could not and did not happen.
8/6/2011 1:47:02 AM
Wow. Did someone tell the ancient Egyptians and Chinese about this?
It's almost like they didn't know.
8/7/2011 2:39:56 AM
The only 'evidence' is from Creation Scientists (which is an oxymoron). There is no evidence of a world wide flood. There is evidence of plate tectonics that push once sea level or below up high after millions of years, but no evidence of your imaginary flood.
8/7/2011 3:52:37 AM
Mister Kettle to mister Pot. This is mister Kettle to mister Pot over.
8/7/2011 5:47:09 AM
You can't find the evidence.
8/7/2011 8:51:55 AM
produce your evidence and I will evaluate it. I'm waaaaaaaiiiiiting.
8/7/2011 10:06:50 AM
3/12/2012 9:53:13 AM
There is evidence of water all across the world, but that's just plate tectonics.
10/15/2012 3:31:21 PM
If there is much scientific evidence, then your must be keeping it very secret, as no scientist has ever found any of it.
10/16/2012 1:53:48 AM
I can easily ignore what can't be shown to exist.
10/16/2012 2:37:36 AM
8/11/2014 6:58:45 AM
"There is much scientific evidence of a world-wide flood."
Science is the
of fundie Christainity: based purely on 'Faith'.
"You can't ignore the evidence."
Show it to us, and that Nobel Prize is yours for the asking! [/hyper-sarcasm] Thus a simple question, Beckers:
won such to date, then?
Aye, that's the argument - and 'be
fs' - annihilating rub indeed.
8/11/2014 7:28:39 AM
This evidence of which you speak... On its way is it ? The truck carrying it has broken down? Got lost? It's in the post? Big kids have stolen it?
8/11/2014 7:33:42 AM