can a rat eat a dinosaur
dude study creation theory and come back
ive studied creation and evolution
creation is much more full proof
evolution is mabeys and mights
55 comments
creation is much more full [fool?] proof - evolution is mabeys and mights"
Religion and science are like that. Religion says "this is how it is - trust me". Science makes everyone prove what they say, and change it if there's new evidence.
The problem is there are hundreds of different religions and they all have their own version. Which one is right? Everyone says "mine"!
How is it that someone can spell 'evolution', 'creation', and 'theory', but can't spell the word 'maybe'?
Is it a prerequisite on My Space that the users be unable to construct a sentence or spell or generally be able to use their brains in any manner?
It's been said before but it bears repeating (because I think it's funny every time):
"MySpace - you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and stupidity."
Well three problems with your introduction.
Modern rats and dinosaurs lived at very different times. Second, the smallest carnivourus dinosaur Comsognathus was about the size of a chicken, and ate small shrew like-mammals for dinner. Third, you're sixteen, you don't know shit about anything.
But as David said, we have fossils. We win. Always.
"Can a rat eat a dinosaur" Whoa, I'm convinced now.
Must be one of those ROUS...
Who are you going to believe, scientists and other rational people, or NIB, a Hovindite who can't spell, capitalize or punctuate?
can a rat eat a dinosaur
Hmmm. I think you're onto something there. [/sarcasm]
Believe it or not, small rodent-like creatures likely co-existed with dinosaurs and given the opportunity they would probably not be picky about dead dinosaur meat. I think that what you wanted to ask is whether a rat can attack, kill and THEN consume the dinosaur; in which case you are an idiot. How is that "proof" of anything apart from your gullibility?
Sgeo:
His english is so incoherent it's impossible to tell what he thinks his claims are.
A few hours of questioning will reveal his thoughts, when translated into coherent english, make no more sense than the original mangled english.
Oh, my, I think I get it. He heard that dinosaurs went extinct, then small mammals took over, and he thinks the dinosaurs went extinct because rats ate them. Now I feel slimy that I even figured that out.
creation is much more full proof
Freudian slip or bad spelling?
You know, I have very little problem with most creationists.
It's the ones that try to insist that it's founded on proof that I dislike. This guy being a prime example.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.