Quote# 18704

Atheists have successfully hoodwinked a large segment of society. This has been done under the guize of science. Evolutionary science's main goal in the past 100 years has not only been to divert people away from God, but to divert people away from their own common sense. This has been done for purely political reasons. This group of mental terrorists have no desire to uncover the truth. Their main goal has always been to justify their atheist existence and to mold and shape society as they see fit...(ie...soicalism, communism.)

But the problem is, their "science" goes against every drop of common sense...starting with something called the Law of Biogenesis. This law states two things: 1) that living things must come from other living things. 2) that living things can only produce other living things like themselves.

Thus, to get a cat, there must be a living thing giving birth to that cat. And not only that, but that living thing, by law, cannot be a chicken or a dog. It must be a cat. To get a starfish, there must first be a starfish (or two). To get a snail, there must first be snails. To get a human there must first be humans. And no one has proven otherwise. Yet evolutionists like to say that this is not case. In fact, to them, this law must have been broken millions of times over the course of history. Of course it's opinions like these which are the consequence of them permenantly living in fairytale land.

But it gets worse for the atheist. The first law states that only living things can come from other living things. This means the theory of atheistic evolution is false because at some point, life would have had to emerge from something non-living. But until someone can make life starting from scratch...(ie...no DNA, no proteins, no nucleotides, no RNA, etc)...nothing but the elements on the periodic table, then you guys have absolutely no authority to claim anything. You have no authority to claim that intelligence came from non-intelligence. You have no authority to claim that an intelligent code did not come from an intelligent sender. You have no authority to claim that the human mind was not the result of intelligent thought. And you certainly have no authority to claim that humans came from monkeys.

All evolutionist scientists/authors have got is the authority to crown themselves as the kings of mythological fiction-writing. And that's all the theory of evolution is: A big, fat, impossible myth based on a fraud premise that's not backed up by even one shred of evidence. The only real evidence they have going for them is the fact that most atheist scientists agree with -- and promote -- the giant atheist propaganda machine otherwise known as ToE.

supersport, CARM 38 Comments [12/28/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom

Greg

And God is a living thing? BLASPHEMY I SAY!!!! Oh, and by the way, I produce many nonliving things unlike myself. That is why I use a bathroom. Although I'm not too sure about you. Apparently, you excrete by typing stuff on the internet.

12/28/2006 9:36:02 PM

szenah

If evolution is false because at some point life emerged from something non-living, so is creationism.

12/28/2006 9:38:25 PM

whitewater55

Yes, SS has struck again.
Pulling \"facts\" from your rectal cavity does not truth make.
The \"atheist/satanic/scientific conspiracy\" boggles the mind.
It has obviously boggled yours.

12/28/2006 9:39:15 PM

Old Viking

Supersport, you're getting yourself all upset.

12/28/2006 9:45:57 PM

Mary Sunshine

So the omnipotent God is incapable of \"making life starting from scratch\"? Sure sounds like a half-assed god to me...

12/28/2006 9:48:36 PM

Napoleon the Clown

How the fuck are evolutionists terrorists? Last I checked, it was your ilk that threatened hellfire and damnation for non-belief, and I'll be damned if that isn't terrorism.

12/28/2006 9:54:50 PM

Zadic

Science doesn't know how the first microscopic life, which everything evolved from, came into existence. There are some ideas being passed around, but until further evidence comes into play scientists aren't ruling anything out. That includes the unlikely possibility that a higher power created it so calm down you insane nut.

That said, the idea of a higher power assumes that a sentient and all powerful being came from nothingness to turn nothingness into the universe that we see around us. So, you're contridicting yourself if you believe that happened as it's not only less believable since you're creating a mountain to explain a smaller mountain, but it requires much of what you ranted about to happen in order for this higher power to exist.

Btw, shut up with the authority nonsense. The only ones who claim authority over ideas are religious nuts. Scientists merely provide the information which they have collected through observation. Just because you are too stupid to learn to use the same advanced tools which allowed them to observe those things, does not make it a lie. Also, atheists didn't create the Theory of Evolution, the Theory of Evolution helped to enlighten people to a more realistic possibility than the many thousand year old; \"God did it,\" reply.

12/28/2006 10:24:59 PM

Papabear

(pulls out the boilerplate)
Shut up you stupid, ignorant, (additional, more colorful insult to be added here) Fundie. Evolution doesn't work that way.


Until you prove that God exists, you have absolutely no authority to claim anything.


Religions have already won all the awards for big, fat, impossible myths based on frauds and false premises which are not backed up by even one shread of evidence.


The ToE is not atheist propaganda. Many religious persons understand and accept the ToE.


Here's your hat. Now, get lost.

12/28/2006 10:27:35 PM

Tiny Bulcher

Can anybody make up scientific laws just like that? Only I have some new ones I'd like to enact (chiefly to do with money and sex).

12/28/2006 11:01:26 PM

anevilmeme

Laws of Biogenesis? What fundie made this shit up?

12/28/2006 11:41:55 PM

sinner

And that's all the creationism is: A big, fat, impossible myth based on a fraud premise that's not backed up by even one shred of evidence.

12/29/2006 12:06:09 AM

Nedraed

I wonder if he realised later that half of the creatures he used as examples of needing two to make offspring are hermaphrodites...

12/29/2006 12:07:31 AM

Adrian

I get the impression that this guy is foaming at the mouth while writting this.

12/29/2006 12:08:52 AM

John

the giant atheist propaganda machine otherwise known as ToE

ToE has nothing to do one way or another with the existence of God. ToE certainly conflicts with a literal interpretation of the Bible. But hard as it may be for supersport to believe, there are actually plenty of people, outside his own bigoted circle of friends, who believe in God without believing that the Bible is 100% literally fact. Not everyone who's not a Baptist or Muslim or orthodox Jew is automatically an atheist.

12/29/2006 12:27:51 AM

Marnanel

Doesn't everyone want to \"mould and shape society as they see fit\"?

12/29/2006 1:07:55 AM

Ed

There is no such thing as a scientific law, you smug asswipe, let alone a \"Law of Biogenesis.\" Laws imply that something is definite and absolute, and science doesn't deal with absolutes; there's always a chance that someone will find a better explanation for things.

Also, it's spelled \"guise.\"

12/29/2006 1:17:18 AM

CousinTed

It seems that creationists have developed a new strategy: Pull new \"laws\" out of their asses and hope for the best.

12/29/2006 1:24:23 AM

Hensley

In supersport's search for proof to his claims he follows this simple fundie rule:
When you have no evidence to the bullshit your writing, just compare your opposition with communism and terrorism.

12/29/2006 3:25:53 AM

PhantasyElementz

So it's either:

Science: Hmmm... we're not completely sure yet. Let's figure this out!

Or

Faith: And God said POOF! Hooray!

12/29/2006 4:59:26 AM

Redhunter

Evolutionary science's main goal in the past 100 years has not only been to divert people away from God, but to divert people away from their own common sense. This has been done for purely political reasons.


So LaMarck, Darwin, and Mendel were politicians in a global cover-up to steal the common sense of the world?

Dude, Wut teh feck?

12/29/2006 6:30:28 AM

Prince Macho Belly

The first Law of Biogenesis: Never talk about Biogenesis.

12/29/2006 7:44:16 AM

Adrian

That's just- oh, it's supersport! Well, that's still deeply fucktarded.

12/29/2006 9:04:42 AM

NotMe

Thus, to get a cat, there must be a living thing giving birth to that cat. And not only that, but that living thing, by law, cannot be a chicken or a dog.


Or what? The baby animal get's taken away by child protection/animal welfare workers? Or do the parents get a fine? And why do you think the ToE deals in the origins of life? It deals in the origins of species, there is a difference.

12/29/2006 9:40:32 AM



One, biogenesis doesn´t exist, and is a product to counteract science, because you have to admit that, in the realm of progress, a seminomad people in the middle of the world, have contributed with NOTHING. Second, you have NO IDEA of science. One, by your reasoning, where was the first living thing, and second, where does science says that WE PRODUCE STONES, FOR EXAMPLE?. Please, at least, if they are unable to counteract something that affects their weak beliefs, at least be honest to admit you have no idea what you´re talking about.

12/29/2006 10:15:30 AM

Tzelmel

He's right. We have no authority to claim intelligence came from non-intelligence. I mean, he's about as non-intelligent as you can get...

12/29/2006 11:15:33 AM

1 2 | top: comments page