Quote# 143221

Look at how well gay men fit into the needs of our elites' childish, utopian and damaging world view. What characterizes gay men?

Atomized individualism.

Sterile sexual hedonism.

Alienation from families, communities and nations, along with their traditions.

A void where an identity would have gone in a normal man, hence the need for "identity shopping" from a market with ideologically curated choices.

No children to support, hence more disposable income for consumerism.

A high time preference, hence no regard to thinking about the long-term consequences of today's decisions.

A willingness to engage in self-destructive sexual encounters with strangers in seedy venues, including ones of other races, which breaks down organic boundaries between the races.

A constituency for socialized health care because their lifestyle accelerates the deterioration of their bodies early in life.

If gay men didn't exist, our elites would practically have to invent them as the nearly ideal model for the kind of New Man they want to create.

White nationalists want normal white people to flourish securely in their own countries.

Which means that they recognize that coddling the white people with broken sexuality conflicts with this goal.

In other words, think of white nationalists as pro-white humanists who want to enforce reasonable standards, including the willingness to say no to the misfits, defectives and losers with screwed-up lives. It sucks for the misfits, defectives and losers, of course, but we have to look to the greater good here.

Albionic American, StoneToss 1 Comments [4/11/2019 11:51:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: WarGoatHK417

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom

Zinnia

Atomized individualism.

First I've heard of this term. This is different from regular individualism how? Actually, what even is regular individualism? The definition and whether conservatives think it's good or bad keeps changing.

Sterile sexual hedonism.

If by "sterile" you mean "unsatisfying", then nobody's promoting that, some people do it because they have nothing better. If you mean "free of disease and unwanted offspring" then hell yeah.

Alienation from families, communities and nations, along with their traditions.

That's called "the side effect of unrestrained capitalism".

A void where an identity would have gone in a normal man, hence the need for "identity shopping" from a market with ideologically curated choices.

This is somehow worse than the "enforced ideological non-choice" they used to have? No wait, being forced to conform to inaccurate stereotypes is "natural", I forgot.

No children to support, hence more disposable income for consumerism.

So the money spent on children just vanishes into the aether and doesn't contribute to the economy? Okay then. Unless you're claiming the "elites" want to promote the sales of luxury goods over increasing the population for some reason.

A high time preference, hence no regard to thinking about the long-term consequences of today's decisions.

I'm going to interpret this as "having more time for fun means less desire to plan for the future." If so, citation needed.

A willingness to engage in self-destructive sexual encounters with strangers in seedy venues, including ones of other races, which breaks down organic boundaries between the races.

No one is promoting this, and the only "organic boundaries between the races" was geographic distance prior to the existence of long-distance travel, and even then the boundaries were fuzzy. Unless you think racism is hardwired into the brain or something, which is clearly not true.

A constituency for socialized health care because their lifestyle accelerates the deterioration of their bodies early in life.

Preventing or treating long-term health problems when you're young accelerates the deterioration of one's bodies? 1.) Citation needed 2.) Why would the "elites" want unhealthy (and thus less productive) workers?

If gay men didn't exist, our elites would practically have to invent them as the nearly ideal model for the kind of New Man they want to create.

I don't even know where you're going with this. I can think of three very different things off the bat, and they're all counterproductive to the supposed "elites".

...The rest of it is just a form of social darwinism which presupposes that white people are inherently superior despite the existence of a lot of individuals which aren't, and/or white people function better in an all-white society.

4/12/2019 3:49:31 AM

1 | top: comments page