WARNING: Disturbing, Graphic Content Ahead

Child and infant rape with BDSM, Legally binding pedophile apologia

Quote# 141129

This post has one of the highest proportions of "legitimately serious possible triggers" to words I've seen: Count(triggers) / Count(words) hardly ever hits closer to 1 than this, so I'm not even going to try to list them; the "award" alone should give enough caution of what lies below. There are at least a couple things that cross over into other hotbeds of psychological traumatization, ones barely tangentially related to any form of child abuse or rape. I put what I thought were the worst parts in light grey, and I decreased the font size (partially for length and partially as a subtle, mild deterrent). If you decide to start reading this, and it starts fucking with you mentally, or even if you start wondering if what might come next will, then just stop. I should have. –shy

Court says ‘pedophilia does not apply’ — because perpetrator is a woman

Female pedophiles. She-monsters.

No such thing. Probably not. A woman can’t be a pedophile. Probably not. The clinical research is thin. Maybe the experts will change their mind, by and by. That happens a lot in the imprecise science of psychiatry.Although one expert’s mind was not changed by this:

A toddler sits at the woman’s feet, his small hands holding on to either leg. In this position, the woman — naked below the waist — masturbates using a baby bottle. The toddler, giggling, then grabs the bottle and drinks from it. The woman looks directly into the camera and smiles. That was one video seized by police from the Toronto home where the woman lived with her husband. On another video, the same woman is lying in bed with the same toddler. Both are naked. She begins to lick the child’s anus. Looking at the camera, she smacks her lips. A third video: The little boy is seated naked on a change table. The woman puts the child’s penis into her mouth. The child giggles.

In all, investigators discovered 25,066 child pornography images on more than 50 electronic devices when they executed a search warrant on April 25, 2016, including 111 child porn movies.

The couple is also shown engaging in BDSM (bondage/domination/sadism/masochism) activities with other couples. Police also found a contract signed by the “Slave” and her “Master,” an agreement containing rules and tasks to be completed by the woman as the submissive member in the relationship. They’d met through a website called “Bondage.com.” That’s who Jason Dickens and Dylan McEwen were, a man and woman joined in holy BDSM during a 2007 “collaring” ceremony — literally collaring — followed a year later by an ordinary wedding in front of family and friends.

Last week, Dickens, a former actor on Degrassi High, pleaded guilty to several child pornography offences, including two counts of making child porn, with an agreed statement of facts read into the record. Earlier this year, McEwen also pleaded guilty to sexual assault and two child pornography offences. She was sentenced to six years. But what the presiding judge would not do was declare McEwen a dangerous offender, which the Crown had sought and with impassioned urgency. In rejecting the long-term offender order, Justice Kathleen Caldwell weighed the various criteria that must be met, primarily a “substantial risk of reoffence.” Caldwell determined that McEwen wasn’t such a risk, relying heavily on the evidence and psychiatric report prepared by a forensic psychiatrist with expertise in paraphilia and sexual deviancy.

Dr. Mark Pearce was agreed upon as an expert witness by both the Crown and the defence when he testified in February. He diagnosed McEwen as a masochist and low-risk to reoffend [sic]. Caldwell accepted Pearce’s conclusion that McEwen derived sexual arousal not from acts committed against children but from the “extreme humiliation” of her involvement in those acts, which fed her masochism, described as on the moderately severe end.

The judge wrote (and read aloud in court): “Dr. Pearce testified that the current research suggests that women do not suffer from paraphilic disorders apart from masochism. This fact lends further weight to the conclusion that pedophilia does not apply to you.”

Crown Attorney Lisa Henderson, the judge noted, had “rigorously challenged” Pearce on this assertion.

“(I) agree that at first blush it appears illogical that women do not suffer from other paraphilic disorders,” Caldwell continued. “Sometimes, however, that which appears reasonable is anything but and vice versa. I accept the doctor’s evidence on this point. He did agree that this conclusion might change in the future as psychiatry continues to develop, but I cannot base my conclusions on speculative potential that have yet to develop.”

In this particular case, McEwen was her husband’s slave, committed to do his bidding. Court also heard, however, that McEwen had initiated at least one of the toddler videos without her “Master” present. And in at least two earlier instances, McEwen had obtained child pornography from two men she’d met online before she’d even met Dickens.

As for the risk-assessment testing, Caldwell acknowledged that such testing hasn’t been validated as being accurate in predicting risk with female, as opposed to male, sex offenders. They don’t really know what they’re talking about, the experts, because they haven’t looked at the phenomenon closely enough.

As an aside, at the Dickens trial, court heard that in 2003 a London-area woman offered him her 14-year-old daughter for sex after they’d connected online. Dickens took the teenager on a movie and date night, then had sex at the girl’s home while her mother sat beside them. Sex with teens and children had clearly been a feature of the couple’s role-playing, in their video commentary to one another, the child porn retrieved from their home and posters also discovered depicting female children, labelled with such descriptors as “15-year-old f--- slut” and “whore.”

In an interview this week with the Star, Pearce emphasized the scarcity of research literature on female sex offenders: “I’m not saying there’s no such thing as a female pedophile , but it is almost an exclusively male disorder. That’s not to say no woman has it. There may be some outliers. But women (sex offenders) usually offend for other reasons, not because of an innate sexual attraction to children. [...] These are damaged, needy, lonely women, not necessarily pedophiles.”

There was immense frustration at 720 Bay — in the attorney general’s office — over McEwen dodging the dangerous offender designation. But there will be no appeal.


Justice Kathleen Caldwell & Dr. Mark Pearce, The Star 9 Comments [11/2/2018 12:03:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom

Thanos6

"These are damaged, needy, lonely women," says Pearce, "not necessarily pedophiles."


Prove that male pedophiles aren't damaged, needy, lonely men.

11/2/2018 1:03:54 PM



How can anyone with a lick of sense find a woman's colossal kiddie porn stash including videos of her blowing a baby and then say "Nah, female pedophiles aren't a thing."

Maybe the whole reason there isn't a lot of literature on female sex offenders is because people like you very pointedly dismiss them. Which feeds into future dismissals. A rapist is a goddamned rapist. Come on Canada, you know better. Karla Homolka ring any damned bells?

11/3/2018 5:45:56 PM

Dizzy Dream

So they find videos of her molesting her baby and don't consider her to be a paedophile.

WTF is wrong with these people?

11/4/2018 10:05:13 AM

SpukiKitty

Looks like these guys had their brains replaced with yogurt, too.

I wouldn't be surprised if these two freaks were secretly nonces, themselves.

I'm all for a more Liberal, less-authoritarian, rehabilitative approach to Law Enforcement but THIS IS RIDICULOUS!

There is such a thing as "Too Lenient"!

************

I watched on YouTube an episode of the Canadian news show The Fifth Estate (which is kind of like the Canadian answer to 60 Minutes). It was about that "1 Lunatic, 1 Ice Pick" weirdo. Before he filmed himself killing and dismembering that Chinese exchange student guy, he cranked out videos where he killed kittens.

A bunch of folks formed an online animal welfare group decided to research and get this guy arrested for the kitty-stuff. They figured out his name, where he lived and everything and alerted several police and animal control groups in Toronto and Montreal....but the Fuzz did nothing to stop the fuzzball-killer.

They feared that he would move on to killing people. He did. Only THEN did the cops do something!

It's like cops at the time thought animal abuse was no big deal or that this online group was just a bunch of internet chuckleheads. Maybe they have a "Priority List" in which big stuff like murder, rape and robberies come first while a weird dude who kills kittens is "small potatoes".

I don't know....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyb4fOBMWds
....Here's the Fifth Estate video in question (though it ends abruptly in a weird, premature way).

************

This new case with the baby-diddler is another case of "Cops going 'DERP!'" but this is even worse since it's a woman with a human infant (not that murdering kittens isn't pure evil in itself)!

Is it case overload? Is it cops secretly agreeing with the perp's actions? Is it a case of "no big deal"? I don't get it? How can people be SO STUPID?!!!

*************

NOTE: Killing cats and kittens is EVIL!

Also; I did not read the OP because I don't want to be upset.

11/4/2018 12:04:45 PM

white bloodcel

I'm just astonished, I can't believe this is the consensus among psychiatric researchers? What about all the women who buy kindle porn about werewolves or incest or whatnot? Or write fan fiction about Sherlock Holmes and Watson being asexual and in love with each other? And I personally know a woman who has a bunch of odd fetishes.

Prove that male pedophiles aren't damaged, needy, lonely men.


That is an excellent retort. Just because someone is all that doesn't mean they can't be a pedophile.

11/5/2018 1:32:24 PM

Chloe

She's a pedophile. She made kiddie porn. She has purchased or received kiddie porn. She's a pedophile.

11/5/2018 2:13:54 PM

Passerby

In this particular case, McEwen was her husband’s slave, committed to do his bidding.


There comes a point where "I was following orders" ceases to be an acceptable excuse for evil. And this is an evil with very few comparisons.

Court also heard, however, that McEwen had initiated at least one of the toddler videos without her “Master” present. And in at least two earlier instances, McEwen had obtained child pornography from two men she’d met online before she’d even met Dickens.


And this utterly disqualifies that previous attempt to skew blame.

In an interview this week with the Star, Pearce emphasized the scarcity of research literature on female sex offenders


I would say sit down and start writing then, Mark, if I didn't think you were a blemish on your profession and one of the contributing factors to the continued dismissal of abhorrent crimes that scar children for life who could only further damage and endanger them by putting the minimizing excrement in your head onto paper where it may poison others.

These are damaged, needy, lonely women, not necessarily pedophiles.


The same is true for most sex offenders that prey on children. Problem is, they're still sex offenders. They're still preying on children. And preying on children makes them complete monsters. Nothing you have said does anything to lessen the indication they would go out and do it again.

Another problem is the way you chose to phrase that along with your general dismissal of the significance of a woman's agency in sex and relationships makes me think you were about to say "a real man giving them a good hard fuck on the regular should fix them" and that would be the last fucking straw.

11/5/2018 5:07:36 PM

pyro

@Passerby

She's in a BDSM contract. She already is getting fucked on the regular, or her Dom isn't doing his job.

11/6/2018 7:31:20 AM

Big fancy speech I guess

This has to do with the double standard on female rape, and the corresponding double standard on female abuse-society thinks women are to weak & pathetic and/or PURE & PERFECT to pose a serious threat like men-and that only men have the capacity for “dirty” things such as sexual desire and violent urges/impulses,although both things can be acceptable under the right circumstances, that is, in the case of sex, sexual activity that is consensual (children can’t consent to adults) and controlled consensual violent activities such as sports, although safe expression of sexual desire is far easier than safe expression of violent impulses, of course, anyway,
Society believes that women are “above” such taboo feelings, and therefore only a man would commit abuse/ and or rape,however women and men are equal, and therefore equally capable of wrongdoing and the wrongdoing of men and women should be treated equally-unfortunately,double standards persist in our society
Also this is legitimately horrifying WTF

11/19/2018 4:43:01 PM

1 | top: comments page