Quote# 141053

It is settled science that, at human conception, a new human organism comes into existence.
Minimal morality dictates that it is wrong to execute the innocent.

Unless the pro-abortion crowd can prove beyond ANY doubt (say-so claims by "experts" do not count as proof) that the human organism in the womb is NOT a person / human being - which proof has never been supplied - then pro-aborts find themselves on the wrong side of a holocaust of immense proportions.

The burden of proof to show that there are certain humans who are not persons falls on the pro-abort. History is replete with human rights atrocities in which certain humans were wrongly declared to be non-persons. This is why pro-aborts have much in common with those who gassed Jewish people because they were "sub-human," and those who owned and whipped Black people because they were "less than animals." You will notice that most arguments put forth by the pro-abortion crowd necessarily and inherently dehumanize the human in the womb. That is their only "hope."

Open-minded seekers, on the other hand, who are willing to follow the science need only adopt a minimal morality to understand that abortion is wrong. They do not have to be religious, highly degreed, rich, or privileged. They only need to know it is wrong to execute the innocent. The fact that some pro-aborts actually make straight-faced defenses for the death penalty for innocents, as well as for executing BORN children, is a sign of death-speration on their part, as they cling to their abortion cult for any and all reason, however irrational.

WorldGoneCrazy-NotMurderedYet, The Daily Caller 9 Comments [11/4/2018 11:40:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom

Malingspann

Unless the pro-abortion crowd can prove beyond ANY doubt (say-so claims by "experts" do not count as proof) that the human organism in the womb is NOT a person/human being - which proof has never been supplied


WorldGoneCrazy (gets evidence supplied; shuts eyes, sticks fingers in ears): "Fertilized egg morphing into egg-sized baby! Fertilized egg morphing into egg-sized baby! Fertilized egg morphing into egg-sized baby!"

11/4/2018 11:56:02 AM

Anon-e-moose

a new human organism comes into existence.
Minimal morality dictates that it is wrong to execute the innocent


Hosea 13:16

Unless the pro-life crowd can have their 'Ultimate Arbiter of Morality' found guilty in a kangaroo court and executed, then Ice Cream Boy can stick his head in a catering-size tub of room temperature Haagen-Dazs and do Bud Brigman impressions (from the Fluid Breathing Suit scenes in "The Abyss"). As he has proved that he is not human.

Because his 'God' certainly isn't.

11/4/2018 12:17:31 PM

Bob J

I'm amazed that WorldGoneCrazy's fingers allowed him to type, "Open-minded seekers"

11/4/2018 12:53:30 PM



"It is settled science that, at human conception, a new human organism comes into existence."

And the bible clearly shows that life begins at first breath, not conception. So whatev...

11/4/2018 1:18:45 PM

ChrisBP747

Actually, conception is far away from even ensuring the possibility of a human child developing. Often the fertilized egg doesn't embed into the uterus and is flushed out shortly thereafter.
By the way, the actual halfway decent argument of the pro-life group (horrible name by the way, implying that the other group is somehow anti-life) is that potential life also has certain rights (to a degree). Since nature doesn't care for our human need of having clearly divided steps, every point in the embryo's development is just as much a trivial one to use as THE point at which a human being begins to exist as the other (well, most people agree that the development of the nervous system is probably a point at which it has clearly happened, but even that is contentious). Arguing though that a fertilized egg EQUALS a human baby is just plain stupid and wrong. Even worse, it's blood libel against anyone who remembers that the mother, as an actual, realized human being also has rights. It's a difficult topic for sure, but man oh man, pro-lifers really aren't subtle about their wish to punish women for having sex. And these arguments of yours wouldn't fly at all in any serious bioethics classes, that's for sure.

11/4/2018 1:52:51 PM

Happy Atheist

'The fact that some pro-aborts actually make straight-faced defenses for the death penalty for innocents, as well as for executing BORN children, is a sign of death-speration on their part, as they cling to their abortion cult for any and all reason, however irrational.'

I'm sorry, who has ever said this?

11/4/2018 2:54:20 PM

Swede

Most of those human organisms get flushed out in early miscarriages. So early, the woman didn't even know about the conception; it's just a normal period bleed to her.
Minimal morality dictates that these are barely more of a life than sperms are. If it's wrong to execute these innocents, then it's wrong to masturbate as a man, Crazy.

NO-ONE is pro-abortion, dolt. We're pro-choice. Any woman should have the right to carry on with a pregnancy or terminate it, whichever she chooses, just as YOU have a right to donate blood or not donate blood, whichever you choose.

Is THIS your idea of a person/human being, Crazy?



GOD is the Holocaust-er, idiot! HE is supposedly the one who created our reproductive systems, and the one who decided that somewhere between 50 and 85 percent of all fertilized eggs are to be flushed out in early spontaneous abortions.

How many unwanted babies have you adopted, Crazy? How much money have you donated to Planned Parenthood, which takes care of many of the children that are NOT aborted? How much blood, kidneys, etc, have YOU donated to the ones who need them in order to NOT DIE? History is replete with people seeing women as property, things, bodies to be used and abused and discard. WOMEN have been seen as non-persons for centuries, you blithering idiot!

YOU, clearly, see women as "subhumans", Crazy. You are as close-minded as it's possible for a person to be.

Pro-choice people say that embryos in the womb are not legally alive, as they are technically "brain-dead".
When they turn into fetuses and develop a nervous system and BECOME legally alive; at that point, most people agree that they have as much a right to the womb they grow in, as the woman has. In most countries, only abortions due to severe medical problems with the fetus, or to save the woman's life, are allowed after that limit.

Who the F**K made any defense for executing BORN children? Most pro-choice people are against the death penalty and against war, and for regulation of guns (at least similar regulation as are carried out for cars and for abortions).

Again, how many unwanted children have YOU taken care of, Crazy? Get back to us when you've put your money where your mouth is. OK?

11/4/2018 3:39:25 PM

KingOfRhye

Are you fucking kidding me? "Death-speration"?

11/5/2018 7:29:27 AM

NonProphet

Oh, it's WGC. I still can't tell if they're delusional or just a habitual liar-for-attention.

11/6/2018 7:19:47 PM

1 | top: comments page