Quote# 137140

[Blackpill] Women HATE the fact that this forum has women's nature SUSSED

Admittedly, there is a lot of edgyposting, hyperbole and venting on this forum, and a lot of CuckTears mistakes that for how everyone here feels 100% of the time and acts when interacting with people. "Even if you don't say misogynistic things IRL, cuz you say them online, you must feel them, thus you must display them unknowingly when outside. I know how you behave better than you do!" etc. There are some basement-dweller theories here, some bad anatomy posts, overgeneralizations and lot of latching onto an idea and running with it and denying events that don't agree with your adopted world view, e.g. "Since women only want chads, any woman dating a subchad is cucking him with alphas on the side derp derp derp".

All that aside, when you break the looks redpill and our knowledge of women down to their base elements, it's generally true what we say:

- Women deny and downplay how much looks play a part in their mate-selection because they respond to our arguments emotionally or with their personal anecdotes rather than looking at the general trend/biology.
- Women generally fuck around with goodlooking guys in their youth and then maybe settle for a safe beta guy when it becomes clear that Chad doesn't commit.
- Women can date up and date a lot of guys due to the male sexdrive, hypergamy, supply-and-demand.
- Being an ugly man and trying to date women is life on max_difficulty mode.
- Women find it harder to pairbond if they have been promiscuous in their past.
- The dating market is skewed in women's favour (Tinder, male thirst, sexual harrassment laws, feminism), etc.


And more.

All of that is based on facts, biology, observable reality, and the consensus of so many men. We know this. We are not bluepilled. We are not controlled opposition. And cucktears and women hate this. They would not have a problem with us if we were discussing which coffeeshops to take women to on dates, which compliments to pay women, which classes to join to get access to women. No. What they hate is us having women SUSSED, FIGURED OUT, UNDERSTOOD. It's like we've exposed their true nature. We have unzipped the "tall man" suit to discover it's actually two ugly midgets one standing on the other.

Women hate men discussing how to get better access to sex (that's PUA's goal although it fails pretty much) and what women's true nature is like (MGTOW, looks redpill). Now I didn't watch that Mel Gibson movie What Women Want, but my impression is that women generally liked it, thus, I guess that it was some bluepill about women just wanting a loving, caring guy. If the movie had shown how women will do anything for Chad, then women would feel exposed and would have hated it. if it showed "cheatcodes" to get women into bed (so they can lie there having orgasms), they would have found it misogynistic.

And because women can't for them life of them logic, they can't counterargue our fundamental points. They instead pick out the edgy posts and strawman the whole community to death with their emotional posting and basic sarcasm.

TLDR: Women wouldn't hate this place so much if our theories were wrong, bluepilled and painted them in a better light. They need to get fucked right in the pussy.

FACEandLMS, incels.me 11 Comments [3/9/2018 12:19:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom

Malingspann

- Men deny and downplay how much looks play a part in their mate-selection because they respond to our arguments emotionally or with their personal anecdotes rather than looking at the general trend/biology.
- Men generally fuck around with goodlooking girls in their youth and then maybe settle for a marriage-willing average woman when it becomes clear that Charlize doesn't commit.
- Men date up and down and date a lot of women due to the female sexdrive, hyperactivity, supply-and-demand.
- Being an ugly woman and trying to date men is life on max_difficulty mode.
- Men find it harder to pairbond if they have been promiscuous in their past.
- The dating market is skewed in men's favour (slut-shaming, male sexism, sexual harrassment), etc.

3/9/2018 12:45:41 PM

Kanna

If I cared what you thought, I suspect I'd be offended...but not as long as you continue to communicate in your SEEKRIT LANGWICH in your treehouse.

3/9/2018 1:08:42 PM

Skide

" They need to get fucked right in the pussy."

You wish.

The rest is basically another daily re-statemewnt of your dogma so that everyone of you can confirm their dedication to it and the dissenters to be banned.

3/9/2018 1:19:55 PM

Doubting Thomas

Why don't you take all your pills, no matter what color they are, and shove them up your ass? You think you've got women figured out but it's clear from what you idiots post that none of you have a clue.

3/9/2018 2:08:02 PM

KingOfRhye

male thirst


OK, I've seen this one a few times now....is this like their new way to say "horniness" or something?

3/9/2018 2:12:56 PM

Pharaoh Bastethotep

@Malingspann:
- Men generally fuck around with goodlooking girls in their youth and then maybe settle for a marriage-willing average woman when it becomes clear that Charlize doesn't commit.

Surely, you mean Stacey?

3/9/2018 3:31:21 PM

Anon-e-moose

Admittedly, there is a lot of edgyposting, hyperbole and venting on this forum


...yet despite that, you haven't realised that men not like you has the manbaby's nature sussed.

You're all actually so far inside that collective closet, your passports have visa stamps for Narnia in them. And why?

Strange how you have no problem talking to each other - albeit online: males - than doing the same, and in RL, with those whose chromosomes are slightly different.

That's what I've sussed from what the likes of you have said. That, and your obsession with 'Chad'. [/Freud]

Years ago, I got to talking with someone at a dealers table at a convention when that person reached out for a book by a certain group of authors/artists, I happened to mention how that had some twists which one can really get their mental teeth into; said person coincidentally* mentioned that they were from the same locale and, coupled with their taste in books, we hit it off. I've been in a relationship with her since.

If it worked for me, what's your excuse?

A journey of a thousand miles begins with but a single step: or a life can be changed with just a few words. But then, you'd have to leave your cucksheds to be able to take said step, Louis.

That's how mine was changed. No 'Sussing' required. Talking to a woman as one would a man: as we're both human beings.

*- Said book, a manga by CLAMP. Specifically "xxxHOLiC". One of the main characters being Yuuko the Dimensional Witch. Her catchphrase being 'There is no such thing as Coincidence in this world: there is only 'Hitsuzen'.

And as that Japanese word translates as 'Inevitability', then I never needed to 'Suss' in the first place: so what does that say about your entire way of thinking, o manbabies...?!

3/9/2018 5:15:37 PM

Citizen Justin

If they had women's nature sussed they wouldn't be incels.

3/9/2018 7:09:04 PM



And the edgy shit is keeping you incel

3/9/2018 7:45:19 PM

Malingspann

@Pharaoh Bastethotep

Possibly; I just figured that "Charlize" (from Charlize Theron) could be a female incel's counterpart to "Chad".

3/10/2018 3:29:54 AM

Wayte

The "edgy" posts are no worst then shit incels have been saying for more then a decade, and long before "hurr uhm just trollin" became a catch-all excuse for any level of shittiness

3/10/2018 11:41:50 AM

1 | top: comments page