Sunshine Girl1 week ago
I have tried to argue till I was blue in the face how absolutely ridiculous evolution is. It's amazing the depths people will go to just to deny God. And, this saying is more prevalent now than ever before, "United we stand, divided we fall!" WAKE UP AND RISE UP?°?
Reply 106
____________
Katone Vi1 week ago
I argued and broke COUNTLESS of evolutionists (thank you Kent Hovind!!!!)... but no matter how many arguments i've broke and how many times I've shut them up completely, they will still say, "Well, I don't know this enough since I am not an expert in this field, but many scientists can answer your counter arguments"?
14 comments
...so where were you when the defence needed you in Kitzmiller vs. Dover nearly a decade and a half ago? Since that precedent-setting - and Constitution-defining - decision by Judge John E. Jones III, that ship sailed, never to return.
And as the defendants relie on a scientist: Michael Behe, and his testimony was all but laughed out of court - via the copypasta howler that was 'cdesign proponentsists' - then you're shit out of luck in thinking your 'Belie fs' can withstand the rigours of the ultimate crucible of Reality: a court of law.
Because when a Professor of Biochemistry basically lies for the sake of Cre(a)ti(o)nists such as you, then we broke you before you started, kid.
United you FALL . What's left for you to survive in that river in Egypt, to save your drowning 'Belie fs' after 'Simulation Theory', never mind 'Teach the Controversy' after (Un)'Intelligent Design': straw subatomic particles?!
I have tried to argue till I was blue in the face how absolutely ridiculous evolution is.
And you ducked to let it pass over your head when anyone tried explaining to you that evolution DOESN'T say anything like "The universe came into existence from nothing purely by coincidence" or "Life arose by chance", it's ONLY about how lifeforms have developed and diversified and are still doing so AFTER life arose.
This is how you get points in the creation world: Claim you've defeated 'evolutionists" without one example of even defeating, or having a decent argument. After all these are people who will say they can't prove there's a god, that only proves there is.
Thanks Kent Hovind.
" It's amazing the depths people will go to just to deny God."
Evolutionary theory doesn't deny god. Any gods. If a deity directed evolution, there's no evidence for it, but no evidence against it.
"I argued and broke COUNTLESS of evolutionists"
You could break evolution by finding evidence that the theory cannot explain. A rabbit giving birth to a wolf, say. THEN providing a SCIENTIFIC theory that explains the evidence where Evolutionary theory cannot.
Arguing using stupidity will probably make you blue in the face, yes, as it's completely futile.
Yep, someone wants to divide you from normal people alright, by pushing stupid shit like "evolution is a hoax" on you, which you gobble up without question. Wake up, honey!
Kent Hovind ended up in jail for tax fraud. Most of what he said was probably also fraud.
Honey, if people shut up at your "arguments", it's because they are baffled at the amount of imbecilic bleating one person can spew.
I find it hilarious that Reactionaries always have to lie and make-up stuff to prove their points as "fer reals".
If one has to lie and make up stuff then what you're selling is obviously bogus.
Frums, Bigots and Bigoted Frums don't care about truth, they care about controlling, dominating and tormenting others and hoarding all the resources. They worship Mammon and The Demiurge/Devil (by 'Devil' I mean the Christian understanding of it, not the modern Luciferian/Dark Neo-Pagan/LaVeyian understanding of it....that said, LaVeyian Satanism endorses selfishness and Randianism, which is stupid and many in some Satanist paths are wingnuts themselves. To me, true Satanism & Luciferianism should be 'Liberal'. 'Might Makes Right' is soooooo 'Status Quo').
To describe the Devil as "Supreme Being of Hate & Evil", I'll just use the term "Devil", not Satan or any other name. "Lucifer" to me describes a good enlightened being and the Shadow-Side of Deity. "Satan" is simply Elohim's Angel of Testing whom the Christians turned into the new "Angra Manyu" to Elohim/YHVH's "Ahura Mazda".
Also; I'll just refer to the Hebrew Deity as "Elohim" (It's more vague, universal, androgynous, both singular & plural. 'YHVH' is an aspect/name for it).
they will still say, "Well, I don't know this enough since I am not an expert in this field, but many scientists can answer your counter arguments"
Do you have an answer for this?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
