You believe I shouldn't have killed and raped a 12 year-old girl when I was 12 myself, but guess what? Not doing that was a major mistake, since it is what modern Western girls are attracted to. Anything but death is an insult to them.
So who's the 12-year-old girl you killed and raped to attract the woman you're supposedly dating, then? Since that's apparently the best way to attract modern Western women, and you've supposedly managed to attract someone despite not changing your views, this obviously means you had to have done so. So who was it?
EDIT: now for some actual effort
Those claims you make a) aren't confirmed in the citations you respond to. That's why you get called out by me. If I commented on a post where Elon Musk said Tesla will recover and said that this shows Elon Musk is gay nobody would take me seriously when talking about this anymore
I take it you've never heard of the concept of "implications" before. It is, to quote dictionary.com, "the conclusion that can be drawn from something, although it is not explicitly stated." Basically put, you do not have to directly state something for people to draw a conclusion that it is a thing. Yes, a comment that Elon Musk is gay based on nothing more than him having gone on record stating that Tesla will recover would be a non sequitur, closer to a middle-schooler (the well-adjusted kind, not one of the "incel" cult) calling anything and everything gay because he's still 13 and thinks vulgarity and offensiveness in themselves are a one-way ticket to comedy without having to add anything meaningful himself to make the joke an actual joke. (By the way, this is an example of an analogy, "a similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based", because I know you're going to say this is another non-sequitur and gloss over the point otherwise.)
On the other hand, when I make comments on your personal life, I make them based on what I can glean from what you say. Hence things like, from this very quote, all of us now assuming you are too lazy to even wash your own ass because of you stating, right up there in the quote we're commenting on right now, that only "entitled, boring straight white guys wash their ass". You make shit up like that I'm "insane scum who should be lined up against a wall and shot" simply because I disagree with your ideas on how a sensible human being should interact with other sensible human beings. When I assume you don't work and are still single this is because of your comments showing disdain for taxes going towards feminist policies and programs and you have been caught lying on many, many occasions so when you suddenly turn around and claim "hey, yeah, totally got a girlfriend now btw" we're obviously going to take that with a grain of salt until you're able to actually prove it beyond simply stating so, which given your track record for pretending your word is concrete proof of anything and everything you said is about as likely as JFK getting his second term as President. The closest you've come to actually recognizing implications in what I say was when you saw my post directly talking about "separate seven-digit kill counts for Nazis, demons and zombies" and actively namedropping a game, and have now felt the need to bring up the fact that I do, in fact, enjoy video games like a not-insignificant percentage of the world population every time you come back to stalk me as if playing video games is worse than being a raging sociopath.
b) don't apply to everybody calling themselves incel - there are huge difference and several "schools" of thought. On any incel community I ran even something like mentioning "normies" or whatever or excluding women was strictly forbidden, just like lookists were banned. The differences are enormous.
And if your communities and anyone other than you and fschmidt in them were worth mentioning, someone other than you from one of them would have been quoted here by now. The other "incel" communities that actually make any attempt at communicating, rather than just letting you do all the talking, are the ones that have decided hive-minded cults are the way to go, ergo my assumption that everyone who identifies as an "incel" thinks the same way because they keep espousing the same opinions using exactly the same lingo in exactly the same way. I can tell you apart from the greater "incel" community without having to confirm that a quote is from you because you don't use the phrases they do and you at least understand cause-and-effect and that we believe what we believe about you based on what you yourself have said (even if you swear up and down you never actually said it), but start digging into that greater community and the usernames are literally the only way to tell that there's more than one of them. I know you know how to work this site's search function, considering how often you home in on my posts specifically, so try looking up quotes from r/incels or incels.me and just see how hard they're trying to whine with one vision and one purpose.
You gloss over this and my offer to prove to you that I don't live in a mental hospital (which I recently discovered is something you said you believe for some female "fundie" as well here, which shows just how easy it is to make these accusations) because you are insane scum who should be lined up against a wall and shot.
It is easy, yes. Here, I'll prove it.
I made my case about Anna Diehl because she went on record stating that if you are a cop, "it’s not your job to maintain justice in this world". Broken down, the statement is basically "it's not your job to do what your job pays you to do", which first lead me to believe that she does not work herself because she is exactly the sort of crazy fundie that would cry "persecution" over things that are not, in fact, persecution - such as a refusal to actually do her job because she's decided it's God's will to just leave whatever she's supposed to be doing in His hands. Since she is also the exact sort of crazy fundie that would live with other crazy fundies who would restrict her access to the Internet because crazy fundies tend to be sexist on top of everything else, I further got the idea that, since she has been able to freely communicate her hyper-Calvinist views on the Internet rather than starving to death in a ditch, she probably lives in the crazy house. She later also went on record stating that "human bosses reward independent thinking among their employees", which anyone who is even slightly aware of what it's like to actually work knows is exactly the opposite of how things are in the work force, so that at least confirms that she does not work.
Simple, yes, but you can see that it's pretty valid. I, of course, am using the royal "you" rather than you specifically, because you'll once again get a headache trying to read past five words, call it a non-sequitur and ignore it or just use it as further vague "proof" that I'm somehow the insane one here.
