klyneal #fundie disqus.com

And I never said there was a Constitutional right to discriminate.
Which is EXACTLY what the gay couple did.

The Bakery didn't refuse to sell to them. They were long time customers, which you dishonestly ignore.

The Bakery owners had sincerely held religious beliefs, beliefs that have existed for thousands of years. That gay couple had no right attacking the bakery owners for their sincerely held religious beliefs. All they had to do was to go down the street to another bakery.

So yea, the gays had no constitutional right to discriminate against the Christian bakery.

CHRISTIANS HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TOO.

My statements stand.

The fact that Christians abolished slavery is very relevant. Give credit where credit is due and tell the truth. THat's pretty relevant, wouldn't you say? Christians were the ONLY ones that did NOT perpetuate slavery since they were the ones that abolished it. A little common sense here please! wow.

ALL THESE CASES (referring to a list of Supreme Court cases that said marriage is a fundamental right) defended TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE, which is EXTREMELY RELEVANT. Traditional marriage IS by definition, marriage between a man and a woman. AND the very foundation that civilization depends upon for it's existence.

Gay marriage is NOT traditional marriage. So they have no right to discriminate against, attack, or try to force change on an institution that already exists.

Like I said, they can find their own "institutions." Don't discriminate against Christian institutions or traditional ones.

28 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.