Quote# 12804

[Of course gays can live with out sex. Anyone can. The question is why they should. Emphasis in original]

Because nobody should have SSA [Same Sex Attraction]. Nor does anybody that has it, want it. Regardless of whether or not people accept it as nomal.

To develop SSA, is like being robed of your sexuality, having your identity stolen. Its not the same as being Born black. If two gay couples who were in love with eachother, woke up one day as hetrosexuals, their marrige, their desire to have gay sex, and their love for eachother would end. They would nolonger see eachother the same way, since these things were based only upon the fact that they had a disorded nature, and had given in to that diordered nature.

Loboto-Me, Catholic Answers Forums 29 Comments [7/5/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom

Napoleon the Clown

Because nobody should have OSA [Opposite Sex Attraction]. Nor does anybody that has it, want it. Regardless of whether or not people accept it as nomal.

To develop OSA, is like being robbed of your sexuality, having your identity stolen. Its not the same as being Born black. If two straight couples who were in love with eachother, woke up one day as homosexuals, their marrige, their desire to have straight sex, and their love for eachother would end. They would nolonger see eachother the same way, since these things were based only upon the fact that they had a disorded nature, and had given in to that diordered nature.

Sound better?

You don't know what you're blathering about. Now shut the fuck up.

7/6/2006 9:35:02 AM

LJ

\"If two gay couples who were in love with each other, woke up one day as heterosexuals, their marrige, their desire to have gay sex, and their love for each other would end.\"

Napoleon points out the absurdity of this quite well but I wanted to illustrate how stupid this sound so:

Let's follow how this would play out.

All the people that are homosexual just wake up one morning and said I'm straight, well, funny that. Sorry dear, I must be leaving you now as I am now heterosexual, I am heterosexual as well, let us part ways.

and the other side of the coin.

All the people that are heterosexual just wake up one morning and said I'm gay, well, funny that. Sorry dear, I must be leaving you now as I am now homosexual, I am homosexual as well, let us part ways.

Sorry I could see someone with the screen name of loboto-me having the above scenarios play out perfectly in their head.

7/6/2006 2:17:59 PM

David D.G.

Weird. An extended version of this post also appears here from a poster called freesoulhope. Can we somehow clear up who actually posted this, and maybe even merge the comments?


~David D.G.

7/6/2006 2:37:41 PM

Hadanelith

Just how stupid are you?

7/6/2006 2:48:43 PM

Dante's Virgil

Married heteros wake up all the time and fall out of love and desire with each other. It hardly requires a change in sexual preference.

7/6/2006 3:30:39 PM

YPhantom

SSA? The Social Security Administration?

7/6/2006 4:10:07 PM

Papabear

\"Because nobody should have SSA [Same Sex Attraction].\"

Says you.


\"Nor does anybody that has it, want it.
Regardless of whether or not people accept it as nomal.\"

This assertion is patently false. I think many homosexuals at peace with who they are. Those who aren't are probably most tortured by the rejection people like you direct at them.


\"To develop SSA, is like being robed of your sexuality, having your identity stolen.\"

Robed? Loboto-Me, you seem like you might be \"robing\" you sexuality in a white sheet and hood.


\"Its not the same as being Born black.\"

That much at least is true. One is skin color and one is sexuality.


\"If two gay couples who were in love with eachother,\"

Two gay couples? Is this some group marriage thing?


\"woke up one day as hetrosexuals, their marrige, their desire to have gay sex, and their love for eachother would end.\"

That is also true. If homosexuals became heterosexuals they would no longer be homosexuals. Deep logic, Loboto-Me.


\"They would nolonger see eachother the same way, since these things were based only upon the fact that they had a disorded nature, and had given in to that diordered nature.\"

BZZZT! I'm sorry, your answer is incorrect. No major professional organization in the mental health field classifies homosexuality as a disorder.

7/6/2006 4:37:54 PM

Hayzoos4eva (Catbert18 in disguise)

@YPhantom:
SSA? The Social Security Administration?


Ya thats right the socal securety adminustratin is for commies and homoes thats y they both hav the same acrunim.

i used 2 be a homsexul but im not anymor, at lest i try not 2 be, sumtimes i get liquored up and i sin, but everybody sins, and jesus will 4giv me even if my wife's not too happy. She threatens to leave me for the maleman, but i tell her thats adultery and thats against the bibbl and she listens and we'r happy mostly

7/6/2006 4:55:18 PM

Amigone201

If two gay couples who were in love with eachother, woke up one day as hetrosexuals, their marrige, their desire to have gay sex, and their love for eachother would end.
Yes, and? Your point being?

7/6/2006 5:53:48 PM

NotMe

Its not the same as being Born black. If two gay couples who were in love with eachother, woke up one day as hetrosexuals, their marrige, their desire to have gay sex, and their love for eachother would end. They would nolonger see eachother the same way, since these things were based only upon the fact that they had a disorded nature, and had given in to that diordered nature.


I can make an awful lot of sense out of this.

But on the same level you can say that black people who wake up white are no longer black. This argument doesn't hold.

7/6/2006 6:43:25 PM

ez-c

Am I understanding him right?

\"Gay people shouldn't have sex because no one wants to be gay.\"

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I would assume that gay people would want to have gay sex rather than have straight sex (which seems a tautology).

If he means \"gay people shouldn't have sex because one day they may realize they're straight\", then that's just idiotic. First, see my previous statement. Second, are there any gay people out there who think being gay is like flipping on a light switch?

He may also mean \"gay people shouldn't have sex because nobody should be gay\". If that's the case, he's living in the fantasy world in his head - not in reality.

7/6/2006 6:49:29 PM

Amigone201

Domo arigato, Mr. Loboto!

7/6/2006 8:35:16 PM

Crosis

<<< Because nobody should have SSA >>>

Says you.

<<< Nor does anybody that has it, want it. >>>

Dollars to doughnuts there's someone on this very site who is living disproof of your asinine statement.

The rest is equally insane, based largely on the stupidity of the first two sentences.

<<< Loboto-Me >>>

You've had at least two of them, haven't you?

7/6/2006 8:48:53 PM

g-21-lto

\"Nor does anybody that has it, want it.\"

Speak for yourself!

\"To develop SSA, is like being robed of your sexuality, having your identity stolen.\"

Assuming you meant robbed, er, no, it's not like that at all. It's more like just realizing that you have an attraction to the same sex. (Then again, I was lucky enough to not have any religious or other sorts of hangups about it.)

7/7/2006 12:17:52 AM

Papabear

Libs R Lame doesn't seem able to compose a paragraph without butt-kicking in it.

7/7/2006 5:07:06 PM

Crosis

<<< The overwhelming majority of American society is opposed to the attempt by Libs to destroy the institution of marriage. >>>

Explain how granting the legal benefits of marriage upon a same-sex couple removes said benefits from your legal marriage.

Hint: it doesn't.

And you might want to check your figures. I don't think you're anywhere near an \"overwhelming majority\" - probably still the majority, sadly, but not by as much as you'd like to think.

<<< but still the stupid Libs keep trying to destroy society. >>>

Again, explain how extending rights long enjoyed by the majority to a minority \"destroys society\". Unless by \"destroy\" you mean \"improve\", you're wrong.

7/7/2006 6:57:25 PM

Ragutis

Well, Libs R Lame, it's not about what the majority of Americans want, it's about what's right. If majority opinion were the criteria, blacks may still be legally inferior citizens and women prohibited from voting. Very simply, gays are being denied basic civil rights every citizen is entitled to.

7/7/2006 7:20:20 PM

nicolle

so if i woke up one morning, and i was lesbian instead of bi, i'd have no desire to sleep with my boyfriend anymore. so what. would that be any different?

7/8/2006 1:59:25 AM

Catbert18

Yes, because historically, the majority of the population has been terrific at protecting the rights of minorities.

7/8/2006 2:36:53 AM

Hadanelith

Just a little definition for you: 53% (according to the latest poll in New York) is by NO MEANS an overwhelming majority. Before you contest, may I point out that figure care from NPR today (yes, I'm sad, but I had nothing else to listen to on the way home).

7/8/2006 5:10:03 AM

miri_rose

I'm pretty happy with my \"Same Sex Attraction'. I'd say I want it; I'd certainly be upset if I woke up one day without it.

7/8/2006 6:33:15 AM

Redhunter

The same question occurs to me everytime one of you 'i hate gays' opens your mouth, \"Why the fuck would you care?\"

Do the world a favour, go donate your time to the homeless, or to a rape shelter, or pick up trash on the interstate. Something constructive, please. You could be doing something useful instead of trying to get that old brain to work. Face it, it's seized, it's not going to work without a major overhaul.

7/10/2006 8:34:47 AM

Mister Spak

I've been robed by homos.

7/25/2006 3:01:41 AM

Giga Guess

"Because nobody should have SSA [Same Sex Attraction]."
Why not? Love is love.

"Nor does anybody that has it, want it."
Actually, it's more that people feel pressured to repress it. You wanna know who the main perpetrators of that are...?

"Regardless of whether or not people accept it as nomal."
So even if we accept it, we don't want it. Did you read this before you hit send?

"To develop SSA, is like being robed of your sexuality, having your identity stolen."
Apparently not. Ask any out gay man/woman. They feel more whole after coming out than they ever did going through the motions of heterosexuality. Few would say anything different.

"Its not the same as being Born black."
No, it's not. It's tough for a black guy to fake being white, but many gays are able to fake being straight. But it quickly becomes a hollow, meaningless existence.

"If two gay couples who were in love with eachother, woke up one day as hetrosexuals, their marrige, their desire to have gay sex, and their love for eachother would end."
And the same would happen if someone woke up beside his wife and realized that he was gay. What's your point? And also, ask many, many gay men or women who have divorced because they came out. There are quite a few that retain a strong relationship with their former spouse. Why? Because, while they may not have a sexual attraction, there's often still an affection there, that demands a relationship, nevertheless, even if it's just a strong friendship.

"They would nolonger see eachother the same way, since these things were based only upon the fact that they had a disorded nature, and had given in to that diordered nature."
I still have no idea what you're getting at. So because people break up, we should just abolish relationships altogether? Seriously, I have no idea what you're saying here, can I buy a vowel?

10/25/2007 5:27:43 PM

Lithp

Uhh...SSA, as you call it, IS your sexual attraction. You even use the words "sex attraction" in it, so surely you do not deny it.

"SSA", or homosexuality as is the actual term, you pseudogramatical moron, IS their sexuality.

Forced celibacy would be a robbing of it.

And your 2nd post makes perfect sense, for a hypothetical. Too bad gays CAN'T just wake up one day and become heterosexual.

Dumbass.

10/25/2007 8:29:47 PM

1 2 | top: comments page