Colin Rafferty:
If you disagree, please tell me why. I'll start: supporting rounding up people by religion and executing them is different from supporting people making their own reproductive choices.

Oboehner:
You rounding up people by religion and executing them now too?
How is brutal murder a "reproductive choice"?

Colin Rafferty:
No, I'm not. I'm explaining how abortion and the holocaust are different.

Oboehner:
Oh I get it, the Holocaust was killing people based on ethnicity, but abortion is just killing people for convenience.

Colin Rafferty:
No, that's not what abortion is.
"Hey, you're taking too long ordering your Big Mac. I'm going to kill you to move forward. It's more convenient for me."
I mean, if you just want to see how much hyperbole you can use to describe something, that sounds like fun. But it's not an actual discussion.

Oboehner:
Don't see the difference between killing to "move forward" and killing to avoid responsibility.

Colin Rafferty:
So if someone saw me shoplift, and I killed him to silence him, that's "abortion". Because I'm killing to avoid responsibility.
If you want to frame "abortion" as something that it's not, and then argue against that, the term is "strawman argument".

Oboehner:
A living human with a beating heart is brutally murdered because mommie dearest wants to do something else, you're calling that a strawman? I believe creating strawmen is more your forte.