Quote# 127289

[[Child molestation survivor: A child's brain is not developed enough to make that decision. Idfc if I said yes.]]

guilt trips and assumptions regarding my actual position rarely work on me. i oppose paedophilia not on moral grounds but practical grounds instead. sex is merely extensive genital contact, particularly in the pelvic regions. your opinion can be subject to further ridicule because you imply that sex must be 'practical' and procreative; i appear to have found someone who believes in abrahamic natural moral law.

ReclusiveChicken, Deviantart 10 Comments [5/18/2017 11:08:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Username:
Comment:



1 | bottom

Mister Spak

"sex is merely extensive genital contact, particularly in the pelvic regions."

Do you have genitals in other regions?

5/19/2017 6:11:55 AM

Swede

If sex is "merely extensive genital contact, particularly in the pelvic regions", why not restrict this contact to consenting adults? Or, if it has nothing to do with feelings or brain-activity at all, why not do it with a flesh-light or a real-doll?

We normal, sane humans see sex as interaction with other humans, caresses of the whole body, laughter, excitement, relaxation. There are many emotions involved, at least in us that have emotions, and children are not really able to cope.

I believe in human rights. Including the bodily autonomy of children, and protection from manipulative adults.

5/19/2017 7:02:11 AM

Thinking Allowed

Nature has no morals. Therefor your claim of "Abrahamic natural moral laws" is moot.

Also with the screen name of ReclusiveChicken, that tells me Mom hasn't kicked you out of the basement yet and the only genital contact your getting is when your hand goes there.

5/19/2017 7:24:12 AM

shy

lmao @Mister Spak

5/19/2017 10:12:28 AM

Doubting Thomas

sex is merely extensive genital contact


And something which can "merely" traumatize a child for life.

5/19/2017 10:42:30 AM

heleninedinburgh

Do you have genitals in other regions?


Does being a dickhead count?

5/20/2017 4:23:06 AM

ReclusiveChicken

normal human rights are things to be disregarded. practices which prevent it will do far more than crying about some social force which any psychopath may disregard. i do not disregard the fact that it is traumatising.

you have failed in your arguments against me and my position. that thread is the gift that keeps on giving and i win again.

5/20/2017 11:50:32 AM

The Angry Dybbuk

"...normal human rights are things to be disregarded."

...until you require the force of law to secure your own rights against predation by sociopaths; then they matter.

5/20/2017 11:01:31 PM

Passerby

Winning an argument and not caring about being wrong are two different things.

5/21/2017 12:49:06 AM

Titania

"Abrahamic natural moral law" - that's definitely a contradiction in terms!

Also anyone who defends child molesters is as bad as them - and deserves the same treatment. That site had some good suggestions.

5/22/2017 7:49:41 PM

1 | top: comments page