Quote# 126423

"I want Mr. Right"

And these females have a list of 100+ things they want in a man and will reject anyone who doesn't have all of these things (unless a skilled Chad comes along).

But da standardz of beautyz are so unfair for wimmins!!!111

TimRattayGotScrewed, /r/incels 20 Comments [4/18/2017 11:21:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
Username:
Comment:



1 | bottom

Bimaac

Ignoring that "incels" have an equally long list of criteria before they'll even consider dating a woman.

Because they're a shallow bunch of assholes.

Just curious, did Tim-Tim get banned? His drivel has been posted several times and he hasn't shown up trying to defend himself.

4/18/2017 12:03:45 PM

RenegadePromQueen

So will you date me, then?

I'm reasonably attractive, in good shape, ridiculously smart, and professionally successful.

I'm also divorced and 35.

Yeah, ... thought not. I'm so relieved!

4/18/2017 2:29:36 PM

Musicalbookworm

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you don't understand how basically anything works. I don't object to some dude not finding me sexually attractive. I object to beauty standards (for both men and women) applying to things where looks really shouldn't matter. I know not meeting them can lessen my chance of landing a job or a raise. Don't even get me started on the role of looks in politics, especially for female politicians. As for that list women have, unless your teenagers, the list is a wish list that every human know is not going to be fulfilled. The list is also prioritized. My deal breakers are all about values and outlook on life. Looks never really entered into it.

4/18/2017 4:20:24 PM



Yeah and every incel expects there partner to be a pornstar virgin that does all of the house work and never speaks. You know someone that doesn't exist.

4/18/2017 4:47:08 PM

SpukiKitty

MY! WHAT A BIG MIRROR YOU HAVE!!!

4/18/2017 9:07:10 PM

Crimson Lizard

Standards of beauty aren't bad in themselves... it's being reduced to nothing but our looks that bothers women. Beautiful women are objectified, ugly women are ignored. Judging you by your looks would be wrong, you cry, but somehow it's okay to judge other people by their looks? (Yes, infant, women are people, no matter what your daddy told you.)

4/19/2017 8:10:02 AM

Doubting Thomas

When I was looking for a girlfriend/potential wife, I had a list of things I wanted in a lifetime partner too. Some things were compromises because they obviously weren't as important as others. I think it's only logical and realistic to know what you want in a relationship partner.

The thing is, though, if you keep holding onto the requirement to look like a high school cheerleader or a supermodel while being a virgin as the number 1 and most likely only criteria, you'll likely be disappointed for the rest of your life and will pass up a lot of nice, decent women. But it's your loss, really.

4/19/2017 8:25:15 AM

Bimaac

>(Y)ou'll likely be disappointed for the rest of your life and will pass up a lot of nice, decent women. But it's your loss, really.

I think the fact that these women are going to avoid having this little douchenozzle for a boyfriend or husband is a good thing, Thomas.

I keep saying that if you showed the drivel that "incels" spew forth to anyone who works with battered women, it would set off more red flags than Soviet-era Russia.

4/19/2017 8:53:14 AM

Rattay

>Ignoring that "incels" have an equally long list of criteria before they'll even consider dating a woman.

What? For the vast majority of us, our only real demand is, "don't be hideous."

>So will you date me, then?
I'm reasonably attractive, in good shape, ridiculously smart, and professionally successful.
I'm also divorced and 35.
Yeah, ... thought not. I'm so relieved!

As long as you're actually a female and don't have any kids, why not?

I find it hilarious you refer to yourself as "ridiculously smart," though; not only because women are never very smart, but also because of the reaction a man would get for making the same comment on his own intelligence.

>I don't object to some dude not finding me sexually attractive.

The fact acceptance broads do.

>Beautiful women are objectified, ugly women are ignored.

Complete nonsense. You have to be *really* ugly - like bottom 1% in attractiveness females - to be ignored...and even then, chances are a couple of guys you're not interested in will have hit on you at some point before you hit 25.

This is one of the sticking points on incels - you people just do not acknowledge the ASTRONOMICAL difference in how easy it is for women to get sex/relationships in comparison to men. In terms of scale, women are like the "one percenters" when it comes to their advantage. Any woman who isn't insanely hideous can join a dating website and get dozens, if not hundreds, of messages/matches without even doing anything. An average or even above average man can join the same websites and not get a single message or match, or get only 1 or 2.

Bottom 1% women may be more or less ignored. Bottom 80% males are ignored.

>Judging you by your looks would be wrong, you cry, but somehow it's okay to judge other people by their looks?

When did I cry about that? What I constantly complain about is people LYING about the fact that this is what women do. We are inundated with this garbage about how "women don't care about looks as much as men," "women care more about personality," if you're ugly you can make up for it with a good personality," etc. And it's all complete bullshit.

>I keep saying that if you showed the drivel that "incels" spew forth to anyone who works with battered women, it would set off more red flags than Soviet-era Russia.

Boo hoo, "battered women." They're strong and independent yet they apparently aren't strong and independent to, you know, LEAVE...if it bothers them so much, anyway. Getting hit for being an obnoxious, oftentimes violent cunt - which is the majority of the time they are hit, don't kid yourself - is something we take for granted as men. We run our mouths or act obnoxious, we could get our ass kicked.

Next time, maybe try not throwing vases or lighting his things on fire.

4/21/2017 11:56:41 PM

Pharaoh Bastethotep

Professor Dunning-Kruger is back! Let the pigeon chess begin!

What? For the vast majority of us, our only real demand is, "don't be hideous.

In other words, you view women as nothing but interchangable life support systems for a vagina. What a wonderful person!

women are never very smart

There are so many famous counterexamples I could give, but instead, I'll just point out that you have demonstrated yourself to be not qualified to judge anyone's intelligence.

This is one of the sticking points on incels - you people just do not acknowledge the ASTRONOMICAL difference in how easy it is for women to get sex/relationships in comparison to men. In terms of scale, women are like the "one percenters" when it comes to their advantage. Any woman who isn't insanely hideous can join a dating website and get dozens, if not hundreds, of messages/matches without even doing anything. An average or even above average man can join the same websites and not get a single message or match, or get only 1 or 2.

Assuming this is actually true... why do you attribute this to physical appearence - which one would expect to be of less importance than in real life - rather than other factors, e.g. dating site demographics?

Bottom 1% women may be more or less ignored. Bottom 80% males are ignored.

Where the hell do you idiots get those numbers? Actually, in reality, about 80% of people marry at least once, and a similar percentage reproduces

What I constantly complain about is people LYING about the fact that this is what women do. We are inundated with this garbage about how "women don't care about looks as much as men," "women care more about personality," if you're ugly you can make up for it with a good personality," etc. And it's all complete bullshit.

1. Even if incel pseudoscience were true, it is not a lie if you honestly believe it to be true. Oh wait, you are a psychopath - to you, honesty is a lie.
2. Cui bono?
3. You would not know a good personality even if you were in telepathic contact with someone who has one.

Boo hoo, "battered women." They're strong and independent yet they apparently aren't strong and independent to, you know, LEAVE...if it bothers them so much, anyway. Getting hit for being an obnoxious, oftentimes violent cunt - which is the majority of the time they are hit, don't kid yourself - is something we take for granted as men. We run our mouths or act obnoxious, we could get our ass kicked.

Next time, maybe try not throwing vases or lighting his things on fire.

And you wonder why women do not flock to your wonderful character (or rather, take it as evidence that the world is out to get you and retreat deeper into your fantasy world where you are the only one who realises the Truthâ„¢).

4/22/2017 11:22:25 AM

Rattay

>In other words, you view women as nothing but interchangable life support systems for a vagina. What a wonderful person!

Not sure how you got that from me saying that our only rule for considering women is that they not be hideous.

>There are so many famous counterexamples I could give, but instead, I'll just point out that you have demonstrated yourself to be not qualified to judge anyone's intelligence.

Not sure why someone who isn't nearly as intelligent as me is saying this, other than your beloved "Dunning-Kruger effect."

>Assuming this is actually true... why do you attribute this to physical appearence - which one would expect to be of less importance than in real life - rather than other factors, e.g. dating site demographics?

Maybe do a little research on this and find out.

>1. Even if incel pseudoscience were true, it is not a lie if you honestly believe it to be true. Oh wait, you are a psychopath - to you, honesty is a lie.

George Costanza logic.

>And you wonder why women do not flock to your wonderful character (or rather, take it as evidence that the world is out to get you and retreat deeper into your fantasy world where you are the only one who realises the Truthâ„¢).

Code pink. http://i.imgur.com/I6pKNFY.jpg

4/22/2017 2:36:23 PM

Pharaoh Bastethotep

Not sure why someone who isn't nearly as intelligent as me is saying this, other than your beloved "Dunning-Kruger effect."

Thanks for proving my point.

4/22/2017 2:47:36 PM

Bimaac

Thank you Tim-Tim.

You know what they say about giving someone enough rope. Something you've done in spades.

You've revealed to everyone what an utterly irredeemable piece of shit you are. And please continue to see abusive relationships in childish black and white terms; ignoring all the other factors that may play a role in a woman choosing to stay with their partner. But hey, you're probably counting on that since that's the only way you're going to keep a woman in your life. A lot of abusers groom their partners and you've revealed that you're innocent looking, something I'm willing to bet you're counting onto help you manipulate someone into staying with you when you show your true colors.

But, again, the fact that you're "incel" tells me that women can spot what a complete piece of shit you are a mile off.

I'm willing to bet if your average "incel" volunteered at a women's shelter, they would be asked to leave within an hour because they were making the women there uncomfortable with his presence because he reminded them of the boyfriend or husband who put them there in the first place.

4/24/2017 6:18:02 AM

Rattay

>And please continue to see abusive relationships in childish black and white terms; ignoring all the other factors that may play a role in a woman choosing to stay with their partner. But hey, you're probably counting on that since that's the only way you're going to keep a woman in your life. A lot of abusers groom their partners and you've revealed that you're innocent looking, something I'm willing to bet you're counting onto help you manipulate someone into staying with you when you show your true colors.

"Women can sense your misogyny, etc.!"
"Women are just as smart as men!"

------


"Women who are "stuck" in abusive relationships are innocent victims, manipulated into staying by men!"


"I'm willing to bet if your average "incel" volunteered at a women's shelter, they would be asked to leave within an hour because they were making the women there uncomfortable with his presence because he reminded them of the boyfriend or husband who put them there in the first place."

Hahahaha. Oh, yes, I'm sure we would remind them of Chad.

Captain White Knight strikes again.

"So what if she was throwing $1,000 vases at you and kicked your dog?!?! That's no reason to SLAP herrrrrrr!"

4/24/2017 2:51:01 PM

Bimaac

Again Timmy, I'm sure if you saw the average abusive husband/boyfriend, it would be like looking in a mirror.

I have a feeling if you ever found someone who had lowered her standards to the point where she had broken out a pick-ax, you would doubtlessly look for even the slightest provocation to hit her.

I'll again state my position that you're perfectly illustrating that old adage about giving someone enough rope to hang themselves. Between your posts here and on your circle-jerking echo chamber on Reddit, you've showed your true colors plus the fact that you've checked all the boxes on the "I'm a Misogynist" list. The fact that you're a cliché just makes you even sadder.

And you wonder why no women wants anything to do with you? Besides the whole potential abuser/stalker/workplace shooter vibe you give off, the fact that emotionally, you're still a teenage boy who thinks that high school has shown him how the world works and he's got it all figured out.

Oh, and "Captain White Knight"? That's fucking rich coming from the "incel"; amongst the biggest bunch of crybaby professional victims on the Web.

4/25/2017 5:41:10 AM

Rattay

Calling someone a "misogynist" isn't an argument, I'm sorry to say.

You think women should be held to a different standard than men when it comes to being physically confronted. I don't. Ironic that you would say you believe in "equal rights," while I openly acknowledge women are inferior.

4/25/2017 2:33:38 PM



"Women are evil and the world is unfair because I sat at a desk sorting mail keeping all conversation minimal and infrequent and none of the women around me dragged me into a closet for a quickie..."

Is much less of an argument.

4/25/2017 5:05:50 PM

Bimaac

>You think women should be held to a different standard than men when it comes to being physically confronted. I don't.

You know Rattface, I can't help but feel that if you ever find a woman who's lowered her standards to the point where she's broken out the pick-ax or you develop enough superficial charm that someone will actually date you, you'll doubtlessly look for even the slightest provocation to hit her and justify it by saying you were defending yourself. I have a feeling when she calls the cops on you, they're doubtlessly going to disagree and I sincerely hope the ones who arrest you are the types who take guys like you off to a nice secluded spot so they can "resist arrest".

And if that happens, please, call them "white knights" and "cucks" so they can say you continued to "resist arrest" and have to pepper spray and tazer you a couple times to "subdue the suspect".

I can't help but feel that if you were confronted by another guy, you'd run with your tail between your legs. Hell, you'd probably get your ass handed to you by a middle-aged soccer mom who had taken a couple self defense courses at her local community center.

There's such a thing as using reasonable force and I have no doubt in my mind, your idea of "reasonable force" is beating her until she's unconscious.

4/26/2017 5:40:30 AM



You think women should be held to a different standard than men when it comes to being physically confronted. I don't.

Hardly. I don't think it's acceptable for men to threaten or smack other men around for daring to talk back to them either, particularly not when there's a significant difference in mass. Despite the assumptions of the ones who like to employ those tactics and probably wouldn't even risk a physical altercation if the difference didn't exist size doesn't always translate to an advantage as any good martial artist proves but still there's the principle of the thing.

A fight's a fight, though, and in the event I'm attacked by a woman (a far different thing from provoking a conflict by glowering at her to have my own way) I use as much force as is needed to defend myself as I would for any man including lethal or crippling blows if it comes down to it. You on the other hand would probably think you need to teach them a lesson and attack while they're down which is completely unacceptable and again motivated by you thinking you hold the advantage.

4/26/2017 10:45:49 AM

Bimaac

>Calling someone a "misogynist" isn't an argument, I'm sorry to say.

Hey, if the shoe fits, and it definitely does for you and your fellow "incel" manbabies, wear it, Rattface.

5/26/2017 6:20:36 AM

1 | top: comments page