Quote# 125553

My issue with non-offending pedophiles is that the only thing differentiating some of them from offending ones is lack of opportunity and/or threat of incarceration.


Who says? I'm a non-offending pedophile and I've had more opportunities than I can count. Threat of incarceration is part of it, but not that big of a part.

The main reason I don't offend is because morally I will never hurt I child. I love children, I don't want to hurt them or cause them pain. I never so much as raise my voice to a child.

The only condition under which I would even consider having sex or sexual contact with the child is if I believed that the child wanted it (of their own free will) and would enjoy it (and probably also only if the child initiated it). I have never had that occur. If it did I would not consider it molestation and I would have no moral issues if I had sex with the child, but I probably would not do so for fear of incarceration (and also from concern that the child would be harmed in the long-term by societies negative views and perceptions of child sexuality and adult/child sex).


If you ever touch a child, even if you think they want it for whatever fucked up reason you can conjure up, I hope said child's mother finds you and puts a bullet in your skull.

You aren't human.



Many children are sexual (this is widely acknowledged by child psychologist), many (most) children participate in sexual play by themselves and/or with other children.

It is not unthinkable that a child would be interested in sexual play with an adult. I don't have to conjure up reasons when it is well known fact that many children are interested in sex.

I am just as human as you, and apparently a quite a bit more accepting human at that.

pfta2a, reddit 9 Comments [3/19/2017 3:50:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Username:
Comment:



1 | bottom

Psycho Tits

I think this guy doesn't understand that children cannot consent. Not ever. Even if they have an interest in sexuality, and express an interest in you, that doesn't mean they understand the consequences of a sexual relationship.

This is why it's good this guy has never acted on his urges, but bad that he doesn't have any openly viable counselling options to treat his affliction.

The fact people address pedophelia in whispers rather than openly has left the pedo OP in a situation where he knows pedophelia is wrong but cannot actually fathom why, and nor does he have any legitimate avenue for addressing his problem.

I actually did search for licensed and trained therapists who treat pedophiles. This happened after I ended up with a pedophile as a client who needede help finding a job.

I wrote an a local psychiatrist who specialises in the study of pedophelia and asked him where a pedophile who wanted counselling can go. He gave two names, both of forensic psychiatrists who work primarily with serial killers.

First of all, then, the pedophile either has to come up with $200 an hour or he can try having his insurance pay for treatments by a guy whose area of specialisation is serial murder. (Gee I cannot imagine what could possibly go wrong there.)

Secondly, since this guy sent me two names located across the country, there's the need for phone / Skype consultations as opposed to face-to-face meetings. I'm just sure people who have been trained not to post their credit card information on a private chat would be all for having discussions about their pedophelia over Skype.

3/19/2017 4:14:14 PM

Kanna

The thing that bothers me is no so much that you lust after children, it's the fact that you've just written many paragraphs of justification for your sexual preference. Sorry, but although you say you'd never harm a child, those many excuses give me cause to worry.

3/19/2017 4:47:11 PM

Uilleam

Even if they express a desire for it, child sex is a damaging enough experience that you should never, ever consider them to have given consent. In fact, I'd say a child who openly desires sex with an adult is probably damaged in the first place.

3/19/2017 5:42:45 PM

Anon-e-moose

I'm a non-offending pedophile


You're still a subhuman, regardless.

Post-Jimmy Savile & Operation Yewtree says so.


3/19/2017 7:11:46 PM

Mister Spak

This isn't fundie. The OPs respondent is more fundie that he is.

3/20/2017 5:36:31 AM

Doubting Thomas

I guess I should give him points for not acting on his urges and realizing that children don't want sex or initiate it, but it's frightening that the only reason he doesn't act on his urges is because he doesn't want to go to jail. Frightening, because if he ever thinks he can get away with it, he'll act on it. And he's yet another pedo who doesn't realize that children can't consent to sex.

3/20/2017 5:52:54 AM

PETF

He hasn't touch any childern,but that doesn't make it less creepy.

3/20/2017 9:08:00 AM

Demon Duck of Doom

In another quote you admit to grooming a kid, so forgive me if I take your claims of not practocing with a grain of salt.

3/20/2017 10:18:34 AM

Frogflayer

The only condition - I'm sorry, there are no conditions

3/22/2017 9:06:04 AM

1 | top: comments page