Quote# 124660

What debate? What conversation? That's what progs call it when they lecture a deplorable on why he is so very deplorable. They are going to have to accept reality: equality is false, "equality" means abdicating the moral responsibility to judge what is better and what is worse, it means preferring the worse to the better, which is bad under every possible system of ethics. Treating unequal people equally is unjust. [edit cut...] Replacing the former nation with others will predictably lead to the US becoming as non-functional as Brazil, India, or South Africa. No amount of pretending equality is going to change the genetic facts.

[edit cut ...]. Non-whites were ~10% of the US in 1965, now ~40%. More than half the children under 10 are now non-white. That displacement will only accelerate as Whites are driven from power by the treason of their politicians, their academics, their clergy. Then Whites will be treated as they are in Zimbabwe or South Africa and civilization will sputter out.There is nothing to debate, our essential interests are irresolvably opposed.

Multan, Information Processing 4 Comments [2/19/2017 8:24:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


These fuckers are just so monumentally bad at understanding statistics. 10% up the population going up to 40% of the population does not represent a numerical decline in the number of white people.

It's like you've got three white guys in a room, and its 100% white, and then a black guy walks in it goes down to 75% white, and these idiots think it means a 25% reduction in white people.

2/19/2017 9:50:13 AM


There is no displacement of white people. There is just addition of people who are not as white.

"White" has not always been "white": https://www.facebook.com/fusionmedianetwork/videos/1631996516826320/

2/19/2017 10:02:34 AM


2/19/2017 11:38:38 AM

Gabriel LaVedier


That's one of my favorite points to make. Asking racists or HBD people who constitutes white. Answers vary by place and time. The best is the example of H. P. Lovecraft who was of the hyper-restrictive "Anglo-Saxon" set going slightly more crazy on finding he was about 25% Welsh and writing a story where a guy finds out he is part albino ape. Blood purity is stupid as fuck in general, but gets exponentially more stupid each time a restriction comes up, mostly by virtue of the psychopathic reactions to learning of personal impurity.

2/19/2017 4:49:29 PM

1 | top: comments page