The Bible does not reference pornography, so does that make it moral?
Song of Solomon. Even reading between the lines, it's blatant porn.
The Bible is the Word of your 'God': literally so, as fundies like you are wont to say.
Therefore thank you for admitting that your own 'Bible' isn't moral, so this fact this alone annihilates your right to so much as think of Taylor Swift as anything else than being utterly sinless and more than infinitely superior to your inferior subhuman - and creator of sin (Isaiah 45:7) - 'God' is the least of your problems.
Hosea 13:16. Therefore your war criminal of a 'God' is literally Hitler. And you don't have the right to think otherwise.
@Ellie
it was grape juice and not wine
What Bible version do you use? KJV, NIV? Or any of the myriad 'versions' that so many fundies like you regard as heresy, and the only 'True' Bible is the KJV? Just as another who is Taylor Swift-obsessed - David J. Stewart (the convicted paedophile) is a KJV-onlyist.
Enquiring minds need to know.
...oh, and one doesn't need to be Freud to figure out your J-boy: who was a gay as they come; what was stopping him from proving us wrong? Reading between the lines means that he - and therefore your 'God' - is gay. And you don't have the right to think otherwise. Why?
Because point out chapter & verse in your Bible - the specific version - where it says 'Asexual'.
It'll be the perfect practice for what'll come next, re. the 'Miracle' at Canaan. Because the only possible way you'll be able to get out of it is by admitting that we Atheists are right, and your J-boy - and therefore your 'God' - doesn't exist. There isn't a single shred of secular peer reviewed evidence to prove that he did, so you might as well admit that we Atheists are right: as we have been all along.
And I suspect that - like the DJS you've modelled yourself on: Taylor Swift*-obsession and all - you're a KJV-onlyist too.
*- Bettie Page in the 1950s. Therefore you don't have the right to think about criticising anyone/anything you subjectively think is 'wrong'. Don't forget that.
...oh, but you do keep forgetting about the one person who destroys your deluded notion that the 50s were perfect. Because you wouldn't have the right to think about so much as mentioning Taylor Swift, never mind objecting to her in any way, shape or form: in more ways than one, if you didn't.
Compared to Bettie Page, Taylor Swift has done nothing wrong. And you don't have the right to think of criticising her.
@#2019223
the king is dead
Nah. He just went home. [/"MiB"] X3
Just as Freddie Mercury didn't die, he simply became too Fabulous for this realm of existence.
And David Bowie didn't die, he simply became too Credible for mere mortal eyes & ears to comprehend.
