Atheism on trial. Exhibit one: The Universe. Case closed.
www.AtheistMovie.com
image
33 comments
@pip: "How do we best discredit the Atheists?" or something along those lines, I would expect. Of course, it's not like they actually have an argument that hasn't been debunked a dozen times over by now, so I expect this "question" to fall flat everywhere except among those who are already true believers.
@Warren McIntosh
And the Answer is 42!
Anyway, though...I'm an atheist, but I believe that there might very well have been some sort of "creator" but we have no way of knowing it until we die....if then. (call that agnosticism, or agnostic atheism, maybe)
So, you've destroyed jack shit, Ray.
Oh, man, I'm not nearly drunk enough (can you ever be?) to deal with banaman's condescending stupidity today...
What will it take for that dumbass to stop trying to spread his infectious disease named "idiocy" throughout the world?
...SIGH. Okay, I'll bite, Ray. What's the question that will destroy us all? Because if it involves bananas, don't. Just don't.
Who created the Creator, Bananaman?
What's that? He doesn't need a creator?
How come the Universe does, then?
If you present scientific evidence for gods, and for your god in particular, then we might re-evaluate our position. That's much more than, for example, the Hambone is prepared to do.
Ray's getting really desperate isn't he?
Whatever the "One Scientific Question" may be I'm positive it leads to a false dichotomy based upon scientific ignorance.
Do you suppose Ray will even understand that the burden of proof is his?
I'm guessing that "one question" will be the Kalam, except Ray will find a way to make it idiotic. I look forward to King Crocoduck, Messianic Manic, and Thunderf00t easily answering your one question in their response videos, a platform which you don't get to edit the replies.
Ray Comfort on trial. Exhibit one: Ray's stupid fucking movies. Case closed.
Ray Comfort's movie destroyed with one simple question...
Is Ray Comfort a fucking idiot?
You can't prove the existence of God with the "cosmological argument", Aquinas' version or Craig's version. The best you can do is argue that something supernatural happened 14 million years ago - and even that is only an argument from personal incredulity, or in Craig's case, an elaborate Zero's Paradox.
pip:
Great! a documentary about bananas.
by the way, what's the question?
You haven't paid him any money, so you don't get to know what the question is.
However, some reviews give away the question - it's simply a repackaging of the old argument that goes 'this looks really complicated, therefore it must be designed, so who designed it if not God?' You know, the one that was first posed at least 200 years ago, was soundly refuted then, and has been refuted again every time it has been posed since then. The only thing that is new(ish) is that ol' Ray-Ray says that it is DNA that is complicated, so must have a designer.
Exhibit one: The Universe, which resembles the Biblical description in no way!
Exhibit two: Rays entire argument is the debunked and worn bare Intelligent Design crap. How's that, if true, prove YOUR God Ray? Fine I guess Vishnu did it, case closed huh?
Exhibit three: God NOT showing himself, I know that doesn't disprove his existence but the Atheists will walk free out of that trial being thrown out for lack of evidence. Same as it always was. And what are we on trial for Ray? Not believing your fairy tale nonsense, well, we'll let God sort that out.
I really feel sad for creationists
They use psychological defense mechanism after psychological defense mechanism to block out all the evidence that goes against their beliefs, since it hurts too much to accept that the principles they were indoctrinated in their whole lives are nonsense
Not that it matters, these miserable regressives will disappear into the annals of history soon enough.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.