Nature: The Fascist
Fascism is the application of science not only to matter, energy, nature and the animal kingdom but to human beings as well. It has been said that nature is the ultimate fascist. You see, fascists believe that humans are an animal on this planet like any other and we must follow the laws of nature like any other. You’re probably thinking that modern leftists do too. No, they don’t. They don’t and they don’t even realize it.
The glaring hole, the massive blind spot, the fatal flaw, the ultimate act of double thinking hypocrisy of the modern Marxist Western world is refusal to address or even acknowledge that the inescapable laws of nature and evolution create biological variety. To vary is to be unequal. Every time I’ve asked one of them to address this they shut down and become a broken record spouting the word “racist” like some priest trying to exorcise a demon.
In the same breath these people will acknowledge evolution as absolutely true, say there is no god and declare all human beings perfectly equal to one another. They will acknowledge that there are different breeds of other species and that you can breed better or worse offspring of any species through selective breeding. We’ve been doing this to the animals we’ve domesticated for millennia. They have no issue with the reality of natural selection and survival of the fittest. However, somehow when it comes to human beings we are magically exempt from all of this. Thousands of years of divergent evolution be damned. We’re all equal, shitlord! And they claim they’re not religious. Heh.
27 comments
In the same breath these people will acknowledge evolution as absolutely true, say there is no god and declare all human beings perfectly equal to one another. They will acknowledge that there are different breeds of other species and that you can breed better or worse offspring of any species through selective breeding.
Evolution is true. There may or may not be a god. All humans are equally human.
Also, comparing breeds to "races" is stupid. "Races" don't have a lot of variation between them, and the idea is mostly predicated on arbitrary phenotypic markers. But there is no absolutely perfect breed, nor any absolutely perfect race.
No, as a general rule and given that a person is not a jerk, then that person should be treated as an equal even if the person may not be as athletic or as intelligent or have the same religion as you.
For instance, you come across as a jerk, so you can safely be treated as an ignorant nobhead, a sort of subhuman aberration, a kind of canon-foddery internet cartoon being.
You're using two different kinds of equality.
Equality of treatment under the law and to fundamental rights as a sentient creature are not predicated on equality of ability.
That being said tests that are adjusted to avoid being biased towards one group or another show remarkably little variation between human "races" when compared to variation between humans within those groups when it comes to most things.
Everyone having equal rights does not mean that everyone is the same.
If I and Stephen Hawking would both apply for a scholarship in astrophysics, there is not question that he would get the job, because he is much better at it than I am. But that does not mean that we don't have both the right to apply in the first place. See how that works?
Is =/= ought Yes we are all born unequal, now tell me how does that follow that we should not have equal opportunities and rules? I could go waay deeper into why we MUST but frankly, I`m not gonna lower myself to discussing a degenerate neonazi trash.
There is no genetic basis for the existence of different races of humans. Darwin himself was one of the first to recognize this. Now, you could argue that certain human cultures in the modern world are ill conducive to innovation and learning, but the fact that an African raised in a "white" environment will reproduce "white" culture while a white person raised in a ghetto environment will reproduce that culture indicates that culture is not hardwired into DNA. Also, read up on some history. If you rewind the clock seven hundred years, you would not think of Europe as the place that would one day conquer the world.
They have no issue with the reality of natural selection and survival of the fittest. However, somehow when it comes to human beings we are magically exempt from all of this. Thousands of years of divergent evolution be damned. We’re all equal, shitlord! And they claim they’re not religious.
First of all, "survival of the fittest" isn't a true evolutionary idea. It's more correctly known as "natural selection." Nor does it say that the stronger organisms have a moral right to kill the weaker ones.
We are all equal under the law, according to the Constitution. It just means that everyone will be treated equally and nobody given special treatment. It doesn't speak to a person's self-worth or moral character.
Can members of different human "races" produce fertile offspring together? Yes? Then, by definition, we all are the exact same species and as such, are all equal human beings. NEXT!
"Thousands of years of divergent evolution be damned. We’re all equal, shitlord!”
Unless you’re gay that is.
No, you colossal jackass, we're saying that everyone has to be treated equally .
We don't base our morality on evolution for the same reasons why you don't kill a woman's kids in front of her so that you can then impregnate her: Empathy. Most of us try to rise above the law of the jungle, thank you very much.
Well, if you're going to use a measly millennium as your yardstick, you're not gonna see a great amount of natural evolution. But still, we have people who are smart and people who are dumb. We have people willing to learn and people stubbornly clinging to their ignorance. Any schoolteacher can point out the differences in little kids, right from kindergarten age. But let me guess what you are trying NOT to say. You think that you are on the high side of those differences, and you feel that someone of another race/ethnicity/gender is automatically on the bottom. You would be wrong.
Yes humans are in a sense animals, but did you ever think that we are more than that because we have the ability to use reason and logic?
Well you obviously don't but the majority of humans have that ability.
If you want to follow the laws of nature then get your ass off the internet and live naked in a cave around a campfire and make paintings. Maybe then you will be like animals.
Okay Mr. Survival of the fittest, I seem to recall the Fascists lost WWII, and the only Fascist regimes on the planet are wildly corrupt backwaters.
Evolution is true, but the survival of the fittest refers only to the capacity to breed. Evolutionarily speaking, bacteria are the ultimate form of life if you absolutely must rank the success of living species by survival of the fittest. In reality, the only barometer of successful evolution is whether or not the species is extinct. We can only judge a species in hindsight and only in a binary, this is extant, this is extinct.
Life is too varied to be ranked by other metrics. Selective breeding is different because it has a set goal in mind, and doesn't normally produce animals that are successful outside of the goal (dogs and cats are woefully inept compared to wolves and wild cats if removed from human settings)
Seeing as how your "glorious nationalists" are a relic of the early 20th century, by your own logic, you must therefor adopt democracy and globalization. They are after all, the most successful policies.
>Fascism is the application of science not only to matter, energy, nature and the animal kingdom but to human beings as well.
This is probably one of the most wrong sentences I've ever had the misfortune of reading.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.