Occam’s Razor leading us to God
image
Well, I think Occam’s Razor (why we have to use it, I don’t know), itself leads us to existence of God.
The existence of me, myself, a conscious being is a big problem which has to be answered. The only way we can explain is that, there is one being, existed without the existence of anything else. Nobody uses Occam’s Razor this way. I do not know why! The question is always like this: “God exists or we created him.” resulting “we created him.” But this does not answer who created “me”? What is “me”? There is no easy answer to this.
What about “It is, because it is.”? Well, then “God is, because He is!”
“Nothingness results in existence.” Well, then what is a “result”? What is “resulting”? Are you sure you can understand the notion “nothingness”. Do you think anybody can? Nothingness is nothing! There is nothing in nothingness! (Can we even say that?) What a fallacy to think there is (I just said “There is”! Then it is not nothingness!) a resulting force in nothingness. (“In nothingness”, whatever it means!) This makes the nothingness God!
Well, we have to accept that there is an eternal being!
This leads us to that, this being, which can exist only depending his self, has to be perfect, because a perfectness like not having a beginning cannot be compared to anything else in any sense. Being not comparable to anything means being perfect then anything. (How true that is!) The notion ‘part’ is a part of our universe, which also our limits our thinking, and does not apply to the One. So, we come to that He is One, He is not like anything and He is above everything. Why? Whatever exists depends on Him to exist, so they can lose their existence by His will. Having a dependency for its own existence is the biggest weakness! Anything except God is like that.
“If there is God, why I do not see him?”
How can you see him? God is not imaginable and is not imprisoned in time and space? Seeing is a physical event done by eyes, ears, tongue, nose, skin! How can we think that, we can imprison God into such senses? In this sense, also the question “Where is God?” is illogical itself. We cannot even say God is inside the universe or outside. The notion “place” is a creation itself.
Thinking! Thinking is enough proof of God. I can think and nothingness cannot result in a concious thinking being! That is obvious and clear. My consciousness can only be given by One who is conscious.
Let’s come to the poetry of the existence, physics! Who wrote it? Why there is a consistency? Why this consistency never falls apart? What is the secret behind that a proton is connected to an electron, in the same way, with the same equations, everywhere? Or let me ask the question this way, an experiment (science is only experiments!) resulting in the same equations is the guarantee of this equations? Anybody who read some philosophy of science knows that science cannot give us facts, it cannot answer the question “what?” and “why?”, it only ‘tries’ to answer “how?”. It cannot tell you why there is a relation between A and B, tell you how the relation works. Science has no aims of truths or facts, it is not the way. If you ‘believe’ in science, you have a religion of the ’cause and effect’ god. Cause and effect relations are not provable, unless they are absolute, which is only the case when we accept the existense of God and know that He is the only Cause for any single thing. If after A, comes B, it is because every single time God wants so.
That is all clear, believe or not believe.
No power, no force but God. That is the simple, absolute truth.
(I would write more, but I think it is enough for the one understands.)