1 2 3 4 5 9 | bottom
Quote# 138337

Message to Psycho Killers with Asperger's Syndrome

I understand what Asperger's can do to people. I have one son with severe autism and another son with Asperger's. I also have years of experience at trying to talk sense to young people with Asperger's.

I have tried to help these victims understand how they have been brainwashed into believing that Asperger's is something to take pride in rather than seeing that they had their brains mangled by mercury in vaccines. I have offered to help them cure themselves by teaching them how to remove the mercury from their brains. Sadly, I think I have only been able to reach a few of them who I know did seek help.

The propaganda from our own government who causes the Asperger's by allowing the mercury to remain in vaccines is intense. Obama appointed a psychopathic liar named Ari Ne'eman to national positions where he helps set policy regarding autism. Young Mr Ne'eman, who calls himself autistic in spite of the fact that he is only diagnosed with Asperger's campaigns vigorously and dishonestly to discourage people from curing any form of autism. Mr Ne'eman thus helps our corrupt government to encourage deranged psycho killers who murder babies to remain mentally ill instead of seeking the cures that have been available since 2000.

The largest increase in these brain damaged kids happened among those born in 1991 when the HepB vaccine was initiated on the day of birth. They turned 21 this year. Millions more are quickly coming of age and I fully expect more crazed acts of violence from them. These kids are largely friendless, will probably never have consensual sex unless they pay a hooker and consider themselves rejects from society. Their lives are miserable. Sometimes they snap.

I can't say I can understand why they would decide to shoot little children but I do understand their anger and frustration at their mental conditions. Most don't know that it's possible to cure their condition because that information is suppressed by our government and the liars like Ari Ne'eman who they hire to promote a bunch of untrue nonsense about autism and Asperger's. These Aspies, as many of them call themselves, have been misled to believe that their social ineptitude is genetic. They have been taught through bogus IQ tests that they are more intelligent than the rest of us and they believe it. They think that remaining brain damaged is a good idea since they don't even know that they were poisoned by mercury which eats their brain cells and lowers their IQs.

I don't suppose I will be successful now at convincing any Aspies to try chelation to remove the mercury from their brains and try to better their lives. Maybe I can reason with them though in case a future psycho killer reads this.

If you're an Aspie who is considering mass murder to take your frustrations out on the world, please don't hurt any innocent children. Be aware that your brain damage was caused by doctors who shot mercury into you, politicians who refused to stop the poisoning due to bribes from the Pharmaceutical Industry and liars like Ari Ne'eman and his band of associated psychopaths from Neurodiversity and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN) who discouraged people from curing you. These are your enemies. These are the people who destroyed your lives. Please leave the little children and other innocent people alone. And, if you want to try to improve your lives instead of going nuts and suiciding yourself, ask me how to cure Asperger's. I'll be happy to help you.

John Best, Hating Autism 5 Comments [6/23/2018 6:37:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138334

Fact: Obama separated children from their parents. The conditions were horrible and children were thirsty and hungry, and in cages, sleeping on the floor.

Fact: Trump followed the same law as separating children from adults which makes sense when Obama did it as well since some of those adults are not parents but are traffickers and it takes time to sort out. Nevertheless, Trump is the one that didn't like it and signed an executive order to fix it. OBAMA DID NOT.

Fact: conditions under Trump were very different. Kids get good meals, beds, blankets, drinks, education, games, clothes, outings to the zoo, egg.

Fact: it costs money. Democrats refuse to help allocate the funds in Congress...because they like the turmoil because they think if they can blame Trump, like you and Robert are doing, people are more likely not to learn the truth and vote for them.

It is much like the mayor of Puerto Rico who is now being prosecuted for hiding food and water, well...actually throwing away food. Why? So she could tell the people Trump,didn't care about them.

The lies about Trump and the glossing over of past administrations are not going to work with informed people.

Shar

sharaleigh23, Realabortiondebate 5 Comments [6/23/2018 5:54:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138331

I love watching society burn

Women and hypergamy may have unlimited power but seeing more and more men get fucked over is hilarious.

Your wife divorced you, destroyed your life and took your children forever? LOL. Shouldn't have shit all over "bitter angry men" who told you not to do that.

Young nu-male cuck can't even get a woman to hug him? Enjoy a lifetime of isolation until your eventual suicide.

That shit is hilarious. I love watching men who rejected the blackpill suffer endlessly.

mylifeistrash, incels.me 8 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138329

why you should never see a therapist

([pizzapastasandwich on r/TwoXChromosoms on "A guy just called me ugly. I know I am but why does it still hurt and how can I stop crying over it?"]
My therapist always told me just because someone called you a certain word such as ugly doesn’t mean it’s true. It’s just their opinion, it’s not a fact.

jfl at spending large amounts of money going to a therapist just to have them spit blue pill platitudes at you.

of course it's twox so femoids eat that deluded shit kind of thinking up of "everyone is beautiful" because "feeelz"

symmetry and proportions are what makes faces ugly or not, this has been exhaustively proved by blackpill and people like faceandlms

refmd, incels.me 2 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138328

(Poll; status 23rd June 2018, 5.51 UTM)
If all crime were legal would you...?
ER...........................................................Votes: 3 (23.1%)
Rape/Torture.........................................Votes: 3 (23.1%)
Rope......................................................Votes: 0 (0.0%)
LDAR................,....................................Votes: 3 (23.1%)
Watch society and the world burn.....Votes: 2 (15.4%)
Endless JBs on demand........................Votes: 2 (15.4%)

Various anonymous incels, incels.me 7 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138327

I wish “The Purge” was real.

Legally for 24 hours all crime would be legal. All the people who made me suffer would pay. I could shoot numales/cucks in their soy filled bathtubs, and slit roastie throats with barbed wire dipped in lemon juice.If ERing would actually be legal it would actually solve most of our problems. Virgin? Take a femoid by force.LTR? Chain her to the walls in the basement. Chad? Dismember his manhood to prevent his seed from spreading. Roasties? Lock them in a secluded room, deprive them of food and water. Forcing them to lick the sweat from my balls as sustenance.

Zaetheus, incels.me 7 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138319

Question: "How is eternity in hell a fair punishment for sin?"

Answer: This is an issue that bothers many people who have an incomplete understanding of three things: the nature of God, the nature of man, and the nature of sin. As fallen, sinful human beings, the nature of God is a difficult concept for us to grasp. We tend to see God as a kind, merciful Being whose love for us overrides and overshadows all His other attributes. Of course God is loving, kind, and merciful, but He is first and foremost a holy and righteous God. So holy is He that He cannot tolerate sin. He is a God whose anger burns against the wicked and disobedient (Isaiah 5:25; Hosea 8:5; Zechariah 10:3). He is not only a loving God—He is love itself! But the Bible also tells us that He hates all manner of sin (Proverbs 6:16-19). And while He is merciful, there are limits to His mercy. “Seek the LORD while he may be found; call on him while he is near. Let the wicked forsake his way and the evil man his thoughts. Let him turn to the LORD, and he will have mercy on him, and to our God, for he will freely pardon” (Isaiah 55:6-7).

Humanity is corrupted by sin, and that sin is always directly against God. When David sinned by committing adultery with Bathsheba and having Uriah murdered, he responded with an interesting prayer: “Against you, you only, have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight…” (Psalm 51:4). Since David had sinned against Bathsheba and Uriah, how could he claim to have only sinned against God? David understood that all sin is ultimately against God. God is an eternal and infinite Being (Psalm 90:2). As a result, all sin requires an eternal punishment. God’s holy, perfect, and infinite character has been offended by our sin. Although to our finite minds our sin is limited in time, to God—who is outside of time—the sin He hates goes on and on. Our sin is eternally before Him and must be eternally punished in order to satisfy His holy justice.

No one understands this better than someone in hell. A perfect example is the story of the rich man and Lazarus. Both died, and the rich man went to hell while Lazarus went to paradise (Luke 16). Of course, the rich man was aware that his sins were only committed during his lifetime. But, interestingly, he never says, “How did I end up here?” That question is never asked in hell. He does not say, “Did I really deserve this? Don't you think this is a little extreme? A little over the top?” He only asks that someone go to his brothers who are still alive and warn them against his fate.

Like the rich man, every sinner in hell has a full realization that he deserves to be there. Each sinner has a fully informed, acutely aware, and sensitive conscience which, in hell, becomes his own tormenter. This is the experience of torture in hell—a person fully aware of his or her sin with a relentlessly accusing conscience, without relief for even one moment. The guilt of sin will produce shame and everlasting self-hatred. The rich man knew that eternal punishment for a lifetime of sins is justified and deserved. That is why he never protested or questioned being in hell.

The realities of eternal damnation, eternal hell, and eternal punishment are frightening and disturbing. But it is good that we might, indeed, be terrified. While this may sound grim, there is good news. God loves us (John 3:16) and wants us to be saved from hell (2 Peter 3:9). But because God is also just and righteous, He cannot allow our sin to go unpunished. Someone has to pay for it. In His great mercy and love, God provided His own payment for our sin. He sent His Son Jesus Christ to pay the penalty for our sins by dying on the cross for us. Jesus’ death was an infinite death because He is the infinite God/man, paying our infinite sin debt, so that we would not have to pay it in hell for eternity (2 Corinthians 5:21). If we confess our sin and place our faith in Christ, asking for God’s forgiveness based on Christ’s sacrifice, we are saved, forgiven, cleansed, and promised an eternal home in heaven. God loved us so much that He provided the means for our salvation, but if we reject His gift of eternal life, we will face the eternal consequences of that decision.

Got Questions, Got Questions 28 Comments [6/22/2018 11:12:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 138311

[Re. the 2007 film, Bridge to Terabithia]

This movie is straight from Hell. To no surprise, they even deny the existence of Hell in the movie. While riding in the back of a pickup truck, Jess and Leslie begin talking about Hell. Jess is portrayed as being brainwashed, and believes that those who don't believe the Bible go to Hell. Leslie openly states that she doesn't believe people go to Hell for disobeying the Bible, arguing that God is too busy maintaining His creation to have time to, in her own words, DAMN PEOPLE TO HELL. Please keep in mind that this movie is targeted towards the youth, and clearly sends out a blasphemous message that open-minded people don't believe in Hell.

The entire movie is rooted in animosity against Christian churches, families, and beliefs. At one point in the movie, Leslie suggests that she would like to go with Jess to church on Sunday. Leslie is wearing pants, so Jess makes the statement... "Women aren't allowed to wear pants in our church." Leslie sarcastically responds by stating that she does own some dresses. At church, the old familiar hymn is sung, The Old Rugged Cross. It is shortly after this scene that Jess and Leslie are discussing Hell in the back of the pickup truck. Leslie makes the statement to Jess... "You believe what you believe because YOU HAVE TO, and hate it; I believe the same thing because I want to and it's so beautiful." Do you see the trickery in her words? She claims to believe the SAME thing as Jess, but she just denied God's judgment upon sinners, by refusing to believe that God would damn anyone to Hell. Clearly, she doesn't believe the same thing as Jess, but is made to appear as the wiser.

Terabithia Film Claims God Too Busy To Send Anyone To Hell

The Bible warns us in Proverbs 14:12, “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” Many people cannot grasp the reality of an angry God Who casts people into a burning Lake of Fire and brimstone, but that's exactly what the Bible teaches in Revelation 21:8, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Brimstone is sulfur. I don't know about you, but I'm not going to bet against God's Word. Here's some of the film's script, teaching children that God is too busy to send anyone to Hell...

Large excerpt from the Bridge To Terabithia script


As you just read, the Christ-rejecters at Walt Disney have much contempt and hatred against Christianity. Laura points to the trees and nature around her when she says “He's too busy running all this” in the preceding quote. God is not TOO busy! The Lord is not pressured, constrained by a demanding schedule or too busy to send people to Hell. Along with their support of gay-rights, Rock music and premarital sex, Disney refuses to believe that the Bible is true; specifically concerning the existence of a real Hell that burns with fire and brimstone, where Christ-rejecters will spend eternity (Revelation 20:11-15).

Walt Disney thinks they know better than the holy Bible—indoctrinating children to question, deny and hate the Bible for proclaiming the truth that God casts sinners who die in their sins into the Lake of Fire for all eternity. The Bible warns that anyone who died IN THEIR SINS (John 8:24) will be tormented, suffering God's angry vengeance (2nd Thessalonians 1:8-9; Romans 5:9). You had better obey the gospel, by believing the Bible's good news that Christ died for your sins, was buried and miraculously raised-up after three days. In fact, Laura in real life would have plunged straight into the fires of Hell in her unbelief! Hell is filled with liberals, Modernists and freethinkers who despise and reject the Word of God. God commands all humanity to repent, it's not an option!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [6/22/2018 9:30:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138308

It's a double standard. Men are seen as sexual beast unable to control themselves and if a guy finds himself in a situation like this, this outcome is to be expected of him. Any other outcome would mean he wasn't really a man. Women on the other hand are seen as sexually in control. Both of themselves and of the man or men they are sleeping with. If one ever went on a sexcapades like this, banging two older guys at one time, she would be labeled a slut.

I see no problem with the kid banging his teachers. And it's not just because I'm a guy. One of the main reasons I see no problem with this is because the two women are physically, and hopefully mentally, mature. Meaning if a child were to come from this encounter, and let's hope that doesn't happen, they could properly raise it. If roles were reversed and a teenage girl was knocked up by two guys, she wouldn't be physically or mentally capable to deal with the child, at least properly. And I know this sounds weird, but in a way it was better that he had sex with older women than it would have been if he had sex with girls his age. I'm not saying he's not, and he probably is, but it seems less problematic.

Templar 331, MMO Champion 6 Comments [6/22/2018 8:12:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 138306

[at 23:30]

Jesus Christ doesn’t live in the throne room all the time. He actually has His own mansion. He deserves it. He had to come and live as a man and put up with all that, right? He died for us, so I think He deserves His own place. He has a magnificent mansion that’s in the biggest field of flowers that all sing. They sing all the time. And I mean they have faces and they sing and they’re beautiful. And I’ve seen inside of the mansion.

… It’s a big place where there’s tables labeled with all kinds of desserts… Every dessert you’d ever want because Jesus likes sweets. And there’s dancing there all of the time. And He plans special parties when someone comes home. He will actually send someone in His Golden Chariot with an invitation to that individual which is given by one of His angels — his personal angels — and they will read off of this beautiful scroll that they are going to be the guest to honor. The honored guest at a party thrown by Jesus Christ…

… He loves flowers, dancing, and sweets. That’s His three favorite things, besides us.

Kat Kerr, Facebook 11 Comments [6/22/2018 8:11:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 138295

(= Regarding a pastor and his support for polygamy=)

"The Holy Trinity is a polyamorous relationship. "

Nonsense. Where does the Bible remotely hint at the idea that the members of the Trinity are sexually involved? How truly sick and twisted such an idea is.

"JH: The only people who have responded negatively are church assholes that have no knowledge of God. "

Oh, you mean like Jesus, who affirmed the exclusivity of man/woman marriage?

That's as far as I read of this blasphemous article.

Oh, you mean like Jesus, who affirmed the exclusivity of man/woman marriage?

That's as far as I read of this blasphemous article.

Mo, Patheos 2 Comments [6/22/2018 8:09:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 138309

Tangent002:
But hey, asylum seekers who make it to the US will be detained, separated from their children, and prosecuted as criminals.

Guest Verified:
Asylum seekers are not separated from their children. Illegals are separated from the children they are bringing over unless they can prove they are family members. Out of the 12,000 brought across thus far this year, 10,000 were brought with human traffickers or pedophiles. You should read what the New Yorker, Washington Post, and Breitbart said about this when it happened under the Obama administration. That's why Sessions' suggestion of DNA testing doesn't sound all that far fetched. Who knows how many missing children may suddenly be found?

Guest Verified, Christian News Network 8 Comments [6/22/2018 7:47:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 138302


Actually, Gardner's determination to identify instances of simple numerical accounting among primitive peoples as viable demonstrations of the "universality" of logical-mathematical reasoning constitutes an egregious downgrading of the very meaning of this form of intelligence. This intelligence has been characterized by stages of development from a sensorimotor stage, through pre-operational and concrete operational stages, to a formal operational stage. In the chapter where Gardner's writes that Piaget "painted a brilliant portrait of development in one domain — that of logical-mathematical thought," he forgets that adolescents in traditional cultures (not educated by the West) barely reach and cultivate the final stage of development in Piaget's theory, the stage of formal operations, in which young adolescents exhibit a capacity to figure out the "implications that obtain among a set of relative propositions" (to use Gardner's own words, 19).

No just in primitive cultures, but outside the West, the logical-mathematical intelligence barely exhibited its full potential. Mathematics is essentially a European accomplishment. Gardner says that "it is left to the greatest scientists to pose questions that no one has posed before, and then to arrive at an answer" (149). Does he know that Europeans and North Americans account for 97 percent of scientific accomplishment?

The history of logic, too, is overwhelmingly European. The magisterial eleven-volume work, Handbook of the History of Logic (2004 –2012), which was written from a "global perspective," and contains four chapters in the first two volumes on Indian and Arabic logic, cannot but dedicate all the other chapter and volumes to the West since almost all developments in logic came from this civilization.

Europeans have also been the best in "linguistic intelligence." Most of the examples of great poets, essayists, and novelists Gardner mentions are Western. We all know that humans have an innate capacity for language, but Europeans have developed the literary capabilities of their languages to the highest degree. Take the novel; it is really a European invention. The word “novel” came into use at the end of the 18th century in England as a transliteration of the Italian word “novella.” The roots of the novel can be traced back to i) Spanish picaresque tales (1500s) with their strings of episodic adventures held together by the personality of the central figure; ii) Elizabethan prose fiction and the translation of ancient Greek romances into the vernacular, iii) French heroic romance (mid 17th century) with its huge baroque narratives about thinly veiled contemporaries who always acted nobly and spoke high-flown sentiments. What British novelists added in the 1700s was a more unified and plausible (down-to-earth) plot structure, with sharply individualized and believable characters, and a less aristocratic (or more “middle class”) style of writing. The novel, in these respects, was invented in Europe, particularly after 1750 (Watt 2001). It was “associated from its inception,” in the words of Roy Porter, “with individualism and a certain political liberalism” (2000: 283). England played the leading role in this genre, cultivating a new sensibility for authenticity, personal experience and feeling, a spirit of nonconformity towards rigid and “insincere” conventions, a fascination with the inner depths of the self. Samuel Richardson’s Clarissa was one of such novels, as was Pamela and Sir Charles Grandison by the same author; as well as Sarah Fielding’s The Adventures of David Simple (1744), Henry Brooke’s The Fool of Quality (1765), Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe (1719) and Moll Flanders (1722), Lawrence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy (1759–67) and A Sentimental Journey (1767).

Same goes for musical intelligence. All humans have this intelligence but it is empirically beyond question that the European world produced most musical styles, the most sophisticated forms of musical notation, and a new polyphonic music where sounds could be seen as a phenomena moving through time, written on a paper using a codified and standardized system of notation for all sounds and rests. Europeans developed into their current forms almost all the known musical instruments. All the greatest classical composers in history are Western.

We are told that "spatial intelligence" refers to an ability to think in terms of physical space, as do architects and navigators. Drawing, jigsaw puzzles, maps, all rely on this intelligence, as well as models, graphics, charts, photographs, drawings, 3-D modeling, multimedia. Again, it so happens to be the case that almost all the greatest navigators, explorers, and geographers in history were European. The invention of modern maps, the cartographic revolution, was strictly European. Europeans are responsible for the development of models, charts, photographs, and the like. Gardner tries to downplay this reality by saying that "the capacity to make one's way around an intricate environment, to engage in complex arts and crafts, and to play sports and games of various types seems to be found everywhere" (p. 200). But most of what he says about spatial reasoning relies on Western instances. His appeals to spatial reasoning outside the West for the sake of pushing the notion that all cultures are equal constitute a downgrading of the very meaning of intelligence.

Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence is about body awareness, using the body effectively and graciously, body language, hands-on-learning, making tools. Again, Europeans cultivated the highest instances of this form of intelligence. Europeans, for starters, are better athletes in most sports. Gardner says that "of all the uses of the body, none has reached greater heights...than the dance" (p. 222). Well, Europeans invented most of the dance forms in history, including the dances which reached the greater heights in difficulty and creativity, ballet and modern. They are also the greatest dancers and the greatest hands-on inventors.

Europeans have exhibited the highest levels of "naturalistic intelligence" in their far higher understanding of nature, their sensitivity towards plants and animals, their unique love for pets and for street animals. The creation of national parks is a Western achievement.

Ricardo Duchesne , Eurocanadian  5 Comments [6/22/2018 12:28:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138301

As an Oklahoma Comanche, I consider myself an "Indian"—an American Indian.

I am not a Native American, nor a First Nations, nor an Aboriginal, and least of all an Indigenous person.

I`m simply a descendent of savage hunters with the most lethal war skills and artful horsemanship known in American history.

I could refer to myself as "nerm" or "num," which, if pronounced half-way correctly, indicates I am of the Comanche people. "Numunu" is what we call ourselves in our own language. But who would know what I`m talking about except Comanches?

White people have called all our tribes "Indians" for over four centuries. And even when they referred to us as Sioux, Comanche, Nes Perce, Coeur d`Alene, most of those names were what some European explorer heard one tribe calling some other tribe.

Few of us are called by our own name in our own language. So what? Names of European countries also get changed quite a bit in other languages: Germans, "Deutscher" are called "Tedeschi" in Italian, for instance. Our Indian peoples are distinguished from one another in historical treaties by the use of these foreign names.

The quest for Ideological Correctness—through terms like Native American, First Nations, Aboriginal, or Indigenous—is ill-fated if not ludicrous. Why swap one European name for another? Why exchange a classy, descriptive French name, such as Coeur d`Alene ("heart of the awl"—indicating able hagglers) for an English derivative of a Latin abstraction like "aboriginal," a vague chronological distinction, or a Spanish derivative like "indigenous," originally meaning poor and naked?

"Indian" is the oldest, most sensible term. When Columbus used the term "Indios" when he wrote to Queen Isabella in 1492 it was because he thought he`d arrived on the western shores of India. What else would he call the people he encountered in the world new to him?

Columbus used no such phrase as "una gente en Dios," as modern revisionists like to say. These contortionists propagate this myth to suggest that we are spiritually superior beings, so impressive that Columbus called us "a people in God." But what he called us was "naked as when their mothers bore them."

That term "Native American," like so many things, appeared for the first time in the 1960s, as part of the legal definition of who is considered an American Indian. It involved land squabbles, of course, and the stakes have always been high. When other groups wanted in on the definition through the term "Native American," many "American Indians" objected strongly, to the agreement of some responsible scholars.

In general, however, academic trends list with the social winds. Name-changing, as other university fads, is generally the work of Marxist racial agitators, ever anxious to overturn "the establishment" as a means of clutching at power. Changing the names of things, usurping their meaning, or removing names entirely, are favorite tactics of these leftists. Thus "Negro" became "Colored," then "Black," then "Afro-American" and now "African American."

But then American states, counties, rivers, schools and teams weren`t generally named after Negroes, so that particular name game had its limits. Indian names are the next target. And that name game is just beginning.

But count me out. Don`t call me Native. Call me Savage, Redskin, Injun, Comanche, Red Devil. Don`t worry about being sued. You can`t victimize me with names. I`m not black, I`m red.

"Indian" is what Americans have always called us, and it is the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant with whom we have had mostly to do. The victory was his, not the Negro`s, the Hispanic`s, the Communist`s, or the Arab Muslim`s. Why should I care what they call me?

By the way, I am thinking of suing a certain Michael Weiner—for renaming himself with my honorable, sacred name, Savage!

David Yeagley, VDARE 14 Comments [6/22/2018 12:28:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138300

America today is making the same mistake we Indians made nearly four centuries ago. America is letting in too many foreigners. And we Indians could end up losing this country all over again. It may come as a surprise to many white people who have been brainwashed by the media to see Indians as the ultimate liberals, but there are few groups in America today who take a dimmer view of mass immigration than the American Indian.

According to ProjectUSA.org, the U.S. population will double within the lifetimes of our children, as a direct result of the massive, uncontrolled influx of foreigners who began flooding our land after passage of the 1965 Immigration Act.

All Americans will suffer. But Indians will suffer most of all.

I`m not talking about competition for jobs, land, housing, energy, water and other finite resources—though these are all important. I`m talking about something deeper. The demographic destruction of Anglo-America will bring the final catastrophe on our people.

What catastrophe? The catastrophe of waking up one day and realizing that white people no longer control this country.

Now why should an Indian care about that? After all, white people are supposedly our enemies.

Well, yes, they were. But, as warriors, we found them to be worthy and formidable adversaries. Defeat is bitter. But when you respect your conqueror, it is a lot easier to swallow.

If Anglo-America turns this land over to blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Middle Easterners and other foreign peoples, for the Indian, it will be like losing this country for the second time. We have had generations to reconcile ourselves to white America. But we do not know these new people who are coming. We fought no battles with them, made no treaties with them, and have no reason to accord them any special respect.

If things keep going the way they are, we Indians could find ourselves bowing down to foreign peoples who never defeated our forefathers in battle—and who certainly never could!

We Indians—especially the more warlike tribes such as my people the Comanches—recognize a kindred spirit in the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. He is like us in more ways than he knows.

The Comanches were one of the most intolerant of all Indian peoples. We had no use for anyone else, white, Mexican or Indian. When we came thundering down on the southwest plains, we took the land we wanted and ran everyone else off. We created the life we wanted, at the expense of other people.

The white man did the same. Only he did it on a grander scale.

In the old days, Comanches were known to honor strength in other people. Comanche warriors even adopted white captive boys, if they happened to show courage and fight.

In many ways, Indians see the white man as a kind of adopted son—naïve, reckless and destructive, at times—but nevertheless cut from the same warrior cloth as we were.

We do not see blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Arabs and others in this light. These peoples may have their own virtues and traditions, but they have no history with us. They are strangers.

If they want to rule us, they must conquer us the way the white man did—on the battlefield, by force of arms. That is the only honorable way for a warrior.

The white man seems to have lost his spirit, and we Indians see it. We see that he is giving this country away to others. And this fills our hearts with fear. For we are part of the land he is giving away. He is turning us over to strangers the way medieval barons turned over their serfs when they sold their land.

But we are not serfs. We are warriors. And we will not be ruled by people who have never fought us.

The white man must regain his warrior soul and take back his land.

In that fight, I will stand by his side and offer whatever strength I have to ensure his victory. Ha tu vi chat! *

David Yeagley, VDARE 4 Comments [6/22/2018 12:28:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138299

Violence in Charlottesville, Va., on Aug. 12 led Colorado Springs officials and residents to take a closer look at VDARE, an immigration advocacy group with ties to the rally's white nationalist organizer that had booked a conference at Cheyenne Mountain Resort.

Under pressure from threatened boycotts, online criticism and Mayor John Suthers, the resort last week announced it had canceled the planned gathering next April.

Despite the cancellation, VDARE is standing behind its controversial contributor, Jason Kessler, the blogger who organized the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville that resulted in the death of a counterprotester who was killed when a reported neo-Nazi allegedly rammed his car into a crowd.

"If it hadn't been Charlottesville, they would find some other excuse," VDARE leader Peter Brimelow told Colorado Politics in an e-mail exchange Thursday.

Brimelow, who is the editor of VDARE.com, told Colorado Politics last week his organization was not involved at Charlottesville "in any way."

"We have a totalitarian left in this country," Brimelow said. "They would shut down the president if they could, so they might try to shut us down next April, but they might also find something more interesting to do."

Two days later, Cheyenne Mountain shut them down.

The tony resort said it canceled the conference but wouldn't say why, only, "We remain committed to respecting the privacy of guests at the resort."

In an e-mail exchange with Colorado Politics Thursday, Brimelow answered some questions:

How would you characterize the way VDARE has been pulled into the Charlottesville situation?

"Typical lying communist propaganda, connived at by the Establishment Left."

Any regrets about working with Jason Kessler?

"No. What Kessler wrote for us is justified on its own merits (although obviously far too edgy for your paper. That's why we have an audience). I'm not going (to) wimp out like the (Daily) CALLER.

"Kessler's not the problem. This purge has been coming for a long time - e.g. we all lost Google Adsense in the spring and the $PLC has been campaigning against us re PayPal for years. It's obviously co-ordinated like the Trayvon Martin scam - there's probably some listserve group somewhere like Journolist, If it hadn't been Charlottesville, they would find some other excuse.

"The amazing thing is that the GOP Establishment, Conservatism Inc. get mau-maued every time. Except the God-Emperor (President Donald Trump), bless him."

Are there any "next steps" in Colorado? Another location maybe? Court?

"Various possibilities have come out of the woodwork, including lawyers. We'll book somewhere else but don't know where or when yet (although CO in 2018 spring may still be possible)."

Peter Brimelow, The Gazette 2 Comments [6/22/2018 12:27:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138297

Your question is beautiful in its simplicity and in its profoundness. Let's change your question, for a moment, to "What, if anything, in the Bible can we believe as true?" Well, if we are to decide which passages in the Bible are true we must first have some sort of benchmark by which we can measure them.

We should not accept or deny any passage simply because it seems to us to be too incredulous or too desirable. (i.e. deny the 7 day creation or accept Jesus resurrection) That is not a benchmark. That is simply an emotion. We need a good source of credibility. So consider this: Is God, Himself, a good source of credibility? If God stood before you and gave you an answer would you believe it? My answer to that is "Yes."

Countless times in the Old Testament specific people relay to us what God has told them. But I assume that, for many readers today, these individuals lack credibility because there are no corroborating witnesses to verify that God actually said these things to them. So maybe we cannot trust the Old Testament to be true. Please read on.

The New Testament features God speaking to people in a very different form than in the Old Testament ... PERSONALLY, FACE TO FACE, as the man Jesus. God took the form of a human being to address man in a very direct manner. Why should we believe that this happened?

Because it was reported, not by one individual, as in the Old Testament, but by many, we can give the existence of Jesus credibility. The gospels of John, Mark, Mathew and Luke are independent verifications of Jesus' time on this Earth; as well as are the 13 books written by Paul. But why should we believe these guys? We should believe them because of how much they suffered for sticking to their stories.

You see, the Apostles all followed Jesus with fervor while things were going well. But, when Jesus was arrested, they all fled in fear of persecution. They abandoned Him. Even refusing to know Him when confronted. Not one of them attended His crucifixion or even his funeral. But 40 days later they were ALL back out in the public preaching His message. For the rest of their lives they continued preaching, against the threat of death by the Roman government. Each one of these men underwent excruciating torture and death rather than retract their testimony that Jesus rose from the dead or rather than stop preaching his message. To me, that is proof that Jesus did, in fact, raise from death and appear, as indicated, to over 500 people. If Jesus can do that He should be given some credibility in what He says. And, here is the kicker ... HE SAID THAT HE IS GOD.

So we have multiple credible eye witnesses, that all died rather than retract their statements, verifying that He raised from the dead. We have Him establishing to us that He is God. So I think we can believe anything He says. And most of what He says is verified by multiple reports from multiple men. But what about everything else in the Bible?

Well, let's look at the rest of the New Testament. Jesus told the 11 apostles (Judas was no longer with them) that He would put the Holy Spirit in them to guide them in their teachings. For me, that verifies the rest of the New Testament. What about the Old Testament?

Multiple times Jesus referred to Old Testament passages, verifying their truthfulness. I believe that this means all of the Old Testament is true.

So that is the LOGIC that I use to support my belief that every word in the original Bible manuscripts is true and infallible. But consider in the book of John, chapter 20 verse 29, when Jesus, after raising from the dead, stood before His apostle Thomas. Thomas couldn't believe that it was Him until Thomas put his finger into Jesus' wounds. Consider what Jesus then said to Thomas: "Is it because you have seen me that you have believed? How blessed are those who have never seen me and yet have believed!"

So I caution you to rely too heavily on logic and proof. Just search the word "faith" in an online Bible and see how much Jesus emphasizes the importance of faith over proof.

God Bless You.

Brian LeCrone, Quora 10 Comments [6/22/2018 12:27:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 138290

[On Melania Trump's "I Really Don't Care, Do U?" jacket]

Beautiful on the inside as well as the outside, Melania wore this jacket on her way to visit border babbies. She was obviously sending a message to phonyfuck virtue signaling self-righteous sanctimonious shitlibs screeching hysterically about a twenty year old border apprehension policy that temporarily separates children from parents until the parents’ fake asylum claims have been reviewed…AND FOUND WANTING.

For this epic troll, the MOAB of trolls, I award Melania the coveted Shiv of the Week.

*hands golden shiv to melania*

*melania lightly grips it in a delicate feminine hand, running the pointer finger of her other hand along the edge of the blade, the sparkles of the shiv matched in luminescence by her hot rod red fingernail polish*

“do you think i didn’t pick up a thing or two watching my husband deal with scum in rat-infested new york?” she purrs.

Melania is the only First Lady about whom I’ve wondered what she’s like in bed. Sensuous, I bet.

Between Corey Lewandowski’s WOMP WOMP and Melania’s triggerjacket, it almost feels like we’ve turned a corner in the battle between the degenerate freak mafia and the MAGAmen, and we shitlords are now on offense, beating the freaks back to their hug boxes.

...

FYI it’s very easy to push the already mentally ill over the edge. A WOMP WOMP here, a jacket there, and a ‘umble blog outpost of realtalk dedicated to opening hearts and minds playing the background score, and mass shitlib suicides are not far off.

...

White shitlibs aren’t as SMRT as they like to imagine themselves. Their abstraction-weighted intelligence leaves them vulnerable to the reality-grounded concrete intelligence of the Chad. Cucks are beginning to learn this lesson: be more like Trump and less like an insecure lackey trying to win the admiration of your enemies.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 11 Comments [6/22/2018 12:19:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138287

It’s not accepted within scholarship. If you had actually read up on this you would actually be well aware of this issue with your claims.
And in terms of evolution, no matter what your priest tells you. Evolution has never been observed.

Mark Jones, Premier 9 Comments [6/22/2018 12:18:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138279

(=Note: This applies to Exodus, as well as Mochael Bussee's family, but Frank Worthen is the only named fundie with specific words attributed to him in this article. He's also the "father" of ex gay ministries and passed away in 2017=)

When Michael Bussee and other Exodus International co-founders and early members admitted that Exodus’ reorientation counselors had failed to change their sexual orientation, one might expect Exodus to have compassionately asked what it had done wrong, help counselees find competent therapists, and take responsible action to ensure that any future counseling actually worked.

And considering that Exodus boasts that it supports families and friends, one might expect that Exodus helped Bussee’s parents, siblings, and wife adapt.

That’s not what happened.

Bussee’s siblings kept their kids away from him and deprived his mother of a family Thanksgiving dinner. His mother felt worse than when his father died, and said she wanted to drive her car off a cliff. Bussee’s sister said she would pray that God makes him miserable for the rest of his life — just as Exodus president Alan Chambers and Focus on the Family activist Mike Haley do today. Bussee’s wife and her church sought to prevent him from having any custody.

Exodus exiled Bussee, and continues to exile whistleblowers and to threaten counselees with ostracism and prayers for damnation.

How Exodus treated Bussee then, it continues to treat people today:

"In terms of Exodus’ response, I got this very loving letter from Frank Worthen of Love In Action telling me that I was cursed, I was an anathema, that I had forfeited my salvation and he ended the letter with very graphic descriptions of the flames of hell that awaited me and he said that his heart was going to be grieved to see me pushed into the fiery pit by the angels on the final day. He’ never apologized for that."

A small group of fellow Exodus ministry leaders came to my house and sort of begged me to turn back. And I told them that there was no turning back, that I had never changed, that I was never really ex-gay and I was just accepting the truth about myself. But they made that one attempt, I think they felt biblically obligated to plead with me one last time but then after that nothing.

So when [my partner] Gary and I left we were pretty much abandoned."

Support is slowly building from LGBT groups and affirming therapists for people who are abandoned by Exodus — but no one tells them that.

"I didn’t get a warm welcome from the gay community because I didn’t know there was a gay community to become a part of so it was a very isolating kind of experience. I’ve talked to people who are considering, even now after 30 years of marriage, after presenting themselves as ex-gay that are considering coming out and leaving Exodus, but they’re terrified of that abandonment they know they’re going to experience. And they’re terrified of the rejection by family and friends and it’ a real fear."

Frank Worthen, Truth Wins Out 2 Comments [6/21/2018 1:48:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138276

What do you think of using Gandhian tactics? Like saying, "I'm going on a hunger strike until I'm given jailbait pussy" and then doing a new YouTube video every day about the progress of the hunger strike, until dying of hunger?

I've gone on many hunger strikes. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.

Leucosticte, Incelocalypse 11 Comments [6/21/2018 1:46:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 138274

God pity the shameful David Gates song “IT'S SAD TO BELONG” which contains the adulterous lyrics, “Yes, it's sad to belong to someone else when the right one comes along.” Today's internet dating websites advertise on television, enticing people to open an account and find out who's interested in you (maybe a rich doctor? or maybe a trophy wife?). No wonder our nation is so adulterous! David Gates is a wonderful singer, composer and musician. Yet, the music of Gates' super popular 1970's band BREAD and David Gates' solo albums are worldly. Many people are familiar with the blockbuster song, “IF,” both written and sang by Gates. Gates hit song “IT'S SAD TO BELONG” caused MUCH divorce around the nation.

Gates is still performing concerts and in response to public criticism from Christians about his song, he jokingly tells audiences today to make sure you marry your second spouse first. Sadly, there is much truth to what he is saying. Most people select their automobiles more carefully than they do a wife or husband. I think most people who experience marriage difficulties wonder at times if they should have married someone else, but such thinking is sinful if dwelt upon, because it will eventually lead to adultery and divorce. America has deteriorated spiritually into a decadent culture of wickedness. Abortion just didn't happen. Only after the 1950's Playboy philosophy targeting men and the 1960's feminist indoctrination targeting women did sexual immorality become prevalent in the United States. Rock 'N' Roll music was the catalyst, promoting a selfish religion of immoral sex, substance abuse and rebellion. Even the west coast's BEACH BOYS admitted to trying to make “WITCHCRAFT MUSIC.”

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 6 Comments [6/21/2018 1:46:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138272

Today's Laugh 6-20-18:



(Podium labelled "GASBAG Chamber of Commerce)

Hillary Clinton (presumably): "Those poor undocumented migrant kids. Nazi this. Nazi that. Blah blah."

Aside, to child labelled "America's Poor": "Get away, kid. You don't suit my politics."

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 12 Comments [6/21/2018 1:46:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 138273

AVES Adventures: I’m a Christian and I hate when people say “that’s not what God intended” I believe God loves everyone and trying to limit his love is awful. That’s not only turning away people from the lgbtq+ community but that’s not excepting ur brothers and sisters. I love everyone and believe that the “Christians” who say that are filled with so much hate. People apart of the lgbtq+ community are strong people that I respect bc they have to deal with so much hate daily. Happy pride month everyone!???????

BleuKitsune: Yes God loves every sinner on this Earth. The liars, thieves, prostitutes, murderers etc. That doesn't mean he's going to look the other way when you go against his will just because he loves you.?

Park Jihoon's Lost Abs and the lost AgustD: Yes He loves them but I feel sorry because they can't enter the kingdom of heaven if they don't change , well only god can change a person.

BleuKitsune and Park Jihoon's Lost Abs and the lost AgustD, Youtube 7 Comments [6/21/2018 9:33:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138266

A brief synopsis of the Blackpill for the new guys

The older members will obviously notice the level of bluepilled and cuck posts from the newest members (May onwards) is much higher. It's to a point now where it's obvious some people are whitenights, some are MGTOWs, some are normies doing it for LOLs, and some are quite obviously trolls and outright cucks trying to convert people away from the blackpill.

But for new people who actually want to understand the blackpill it's critical that you know the conclusion of the blackpill: "IT'S OVER"

'It's over', means that no matter what you think, it's over. Therefore, one cannot be blackpilled and hold on to gradiose notions of male rights or male equality. If it's over, then concepts like male rights and equality are utterly illogical.

The blackpill means that your looks determine upwards of 90% (maybe I'm cucked for thinking it's that low; strict adherence to the blackpill would put it at 100%) of your success in sexual interaction with females. So, if you don't have the minimum standard of looks (not entirely sure what X/10 the cutoff is; debate still rages) then you literally get no sexual interactions. ZERO!

A vital part of a man's identity is defined by his sexual interactions with women. So, when he consistently gets ZERO sexual interactions there is a point at which something dies inside that man. He basically accepts that it's over. At this point, his looks now limit his entire being, because, not only have they precluded him from meaningful sexual relations, the lack of said relations has caused a critical retardation in his development as a man in general.

How can a man be confident when he never gets sex no matter what he has tried due to his looks? How can he be happy? How can he be optimistic about the future? How can he be positive about society? How can he have love for others when noone loves him? And as the time goes by, how can he even exist without every minute of his existence being an experience of limitless pain and despair? So you see, the lack of sex is simply the catalyst for a series of much deeper circles of hell that the incel slowly progresses through. Until slowly piece by piece his entire heart has turned black and any capacity for positive emotion has been removed.

At this point, it truly is over for that individual. So, you see it it utterly pointless to talk of the multitude of injustices that men face. The true blackpilled incel has moved way beyond the ability to care about such trivialities. His daily struggle is now simply to decide between coping or roping whilst hoping that the system totally collapses. The system that has never shown him any love, never given him a reason to feel positive. If anything, the truly blackpilled embrace the continual injustices committed against men because each injustice takes the system closer to collapse. And a total collapse is the only possible way to convert "IT'S OVER" to "IT'S NOT OVER YET".

platypus, incels.me 4 Comments [6/21/2018 6:22:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
1 2 3 4 5 9 | top