1 2 3 4 5 10 15 19 | bottom
Quote# 130879

Mothers friend tried to avoid introducing her daughter to her subhuman son for the purposes of arranged marriage

Not Indian, but Mum wanted to get me into a pseudo arranged marriage with some rich family because even she was being affected by my inceldom (she's afraid I will end up marrying a hooker). When the other mother saw me, she went cold on my mother (even though they talk quite often). She has been avoiding my mother ever since. My poor mum thinks she did something wrong but I know the truth: my looks.

Inceldemographic, /r/incels 12 Comments [8/22/2017 10:52:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Death Cult Award

“...some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.”

Quote# 130878

Modern females are corrupted beyond repair.

Feminism has destroyed the most recent generations of females. There would need to be a major cataclysm that would wipe out a very large portion of the world's populations to cleanse the degeneracy caused by feminism. Surviving would require a more intelligent and patriarchal way of life.

actually modern females are their natural and true state the one god intended from the start

GTFO cuck

u r just butthurt because women ar eprogrammed to fuck chad only and u r not him. 80/20 is NATURE baby

Bro you wouldn't be sitting in your room posting this retarded shit from your smartphone over the internet if it weren't for our millennia-long struggle with our own nature. Without forced monogamy we would be sitting in trees flinging shit at each other.

Agreed. Through Western society itself seems to be corrupted beyond repair. The cultural revolutions of the 60s may have been seen to be a good thing, but this is when the road to hypergamy started.

Well, extreme hypergamy. Hypergamy has always existed on some level, even at times when most marriages were arranged. Then the parents would try to pair off their daughters to men in wealthy families.

It won't last long, our patriarchal, agrarian forefathers fucked up matriarchal hunter gatherers. It will occur again. Muslims will invade European countries. Fascism will increase in West as a consequence. When fascism increases, those degeneracy lowers.

I pray to St. Blackops2cel that Donald Trump starts a nuclear war.

I long for WW3, brother. Either I will be nuked in the opening atomic exchange, or I will be drafted and sent to a killing zone. If by some miracle I survive, I could take part in the rebuilding of human society.

There is no losing for us if WW3 happens. There is sweet relief if we die but if we survive the male population would be so depleted like the last world war we should get a female (you can never be certain as a subhuman).

Agreed, brother. Either way, hypergamy will end and necessity will provide sex for all.

Do you think its possible to just brainwash them again? If women are so malleable I think we could just inculcate the next germination to believe the sex is bad while marriage and loyalty are good.

Telling little girls this adds to the problem I think. When they realize that it was just manipulation, they throw themselves into feminist shit.

And how would 1-2% of the population have more influence on children than the majority? We're already being labelled as undesirables and creeps so imagine what would happen if we tried to approach children.

And how would 1-2% of the population have more influence on children than the majority

Convert to Judaism

Females are foolish creatures that easily conform to today's trends like sheeple

I utterly despise conformists

(bisexual_male_I'm mostly gay.)

We're at the peak right now. By century's end, everything will have gone to hell.

So if it helps, the current social order is a very transient thing.

Various incels, /r/incels 9 Comments [8/22/2017 10:52:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 130876

Most of the time, scientists are not liars and are genuinely trying to discover and understand the laws of the universe. But whenever scientists are confronted with anything that has to do with God or evolution, then scientists on the whole always lie to us and they are brazen about it.

For example, until 1956, scientists falsely claimed that humans and apes had the same number of chromosomes and therefore humans evolved from apes. But the fact is, humans actually have 23 pairs of chromosomes while apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Apes, gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans, etc. all have more chromosomes than humans.

During the first half of the 20th century, that fact would have seriously weakened “ape into human evolution theory” because there is no way to explain how apes, with 24 pairs of chromosomes, could have evolved into humans with 23 pairs of chromosomes. We all know that if we lose a pair of chromosomes, we cannot reproduce.

During the first half of the 20th century, there was a ferocious war between evolution theory and creationism and Darwin’s supporters were extremely hard pressed to “find the missing link.” Darwinians could not find the missing link so they simply fabricated one by faking the Piltdown Man skull.
Darwinians also were determined to hide any evidence that contradicted their beloved evolution theory. That is why atheist scientists simply concocted a lie and told us apes and humans both have 24 pairs of chromosomes.

An atheist scientist named Theophilus Painter took the lead and published a paper in 1921 claiming humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Other atheist scientists “confirmed” this in other scientific papers. It was not until 1956 that the fraud came to an end because evolution theory had gained enough support to not need to be buttressed by the 24 chromosome lie. The “apes and humans have the same number of chromosome lie” had done its damage to the truth - Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung all pointed to the “24 chromosome lie” as a reason for them to ban the teaching of creationism from German, Russian and Chinese schools.

We bet you did not know that atheists claimed that “apes and humans have the same number of chromosomes.”

It is worthy to note that even now, scientists are prevaricating about this matter and they insist they did not lie to us about humans having 24 pairs of chromosomes. Instead they tell us they made an “understandable mistake” and it was very difficult to accurately count all the way up to 24 pairs of chromosomes.

It is absurd for atheists to assert that the counting of just 23 pairs of chromosomes was so difficult that none of them could do it correctly for over 30 years. Guess what? They had no trouble counting the much larger number of chromosomes for other animals, such as dogs who have 39 pairs.

Unknown author, DarwinConsipiracy 13 Comments [8/22/2017 10:51:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130874

We are trained scientists and everything you read on this website is based on the latest scientific discoveries published in the most respected peer reviewed scientific journals.

Nothing we write on this website is based on the Bible or any religious beliefs.

But we are persons of faith and proud of it. In fact, we have no doubt we are better scientists because we embrace Divine Providence, as did all fifty-six Founding Fathers who signed the Declaration of Independence.

The only goal of this website is to use scientific methodology to seek the truth and the truth is there have recently been earth shaking scientific discoveries in genetics that now proven Darwin was wrong because:

“Ape to human evolution” is impossible - recent DNA tests reveal that ape and human DNA are far too different for humans to have evolved from apes.

“One species into another species evolution” cannot occur in bisexual animals becaue the laws of genetics and embryology preserve each species and prevent any bisexual species from evolving into another.

This website will provide you with details from peer reviewed scientific journals to support all this.

If you are wondering why you have not read about any of this, it is because a very powerful Darwin Conspiracy, led by atheists, has suppressed the truth about evolution theory and fed us lie after lie after lie for over 100 years.

The Darwin Conspiracy has both faked evidence, suppressed evidence and it currently constantly lies to promote Darwinism.

The Piltdown Man is an example of the power of the Darwin Conspiracy and how insidious the conspiracy has been.

In 1912, Darwin's “ape to human evolution theory” was at its most critical crossroads – Darwnians had to either come up with the “missing link” or evolution theory would become extinct. For decades, critics of “ape to human evolution theory” had pounded it by insisting that unless it comes forward with evidence of the “missing link,” then “ape to human evolution theory” should be put to death.

In the fall of 1912, the Darwin Conspiracy was formed and on December 18, 1912, the Geological Society, with the assistance of co-conspirator British Museum of Natural History, unvieled a faked skull that they claimed was the “missing link.” Their forgery led to headlines all over the world proclaiming “Missing Link Found – Darwin's Theory Proved.”

The faked Piltdown Man saved Darwin's Theory of evolution from being quickly extinct, and for the next forty years, atheists incessantly cited the fake Piltdown Man skull as irrefutable evidence for “ape to human evolution theory.”

Faking evidence is bad enough but the British Museum and other Darwin Conpirators went much further. They not only faked evidence but the British Museum insisted on being “keeper of the Piltdown Man skull” and refused to permit anyone to examine the Piltdown Man skull. In effect, the British Museum said “We have the evidence but we will not allow anyone to examine or verify our evidence and you just have to take our word for it.”

The British Museum claimed they were afraid the Piltdown Skull would be somehow contaminated or harmed if any one examined it. But the real reason no one was allowed to even look at it from a distance is that it was so obvious a fake.

For over three decades, the British Museum arrogantly denied any requests to examine the fake Piltdown Man skull. Most of the scientific community did not object because they were atheists and part of the Darwin Consipiracy

But then, Darwinians ran into a problem that forced the British Museum to change its stance.

By 1949, most Darwinists supported the “Man Came Out of Africa Theory” of human evolution which said that humans evolved from apes in Africa. But this theory was directly contradicted by the Piltdown Man skull because that faked skull would support the theory that humans came from England, or Europe instead of Africa.

In fact, in 1949, the fake Piltdown Man skull stood in the way of “Man Came Out of Africa Theory” and several prominent Darwinists, including Louis Leakey (who discovered “Lucy”) convinced the British Museum to allow them to examine the Piltdown Man skull.

A History Channel documentary revealed that Louis Leakey said that the Piltdown Man skull was so obvious a forgery that he could tell the skull was a fake from over fifteen feet away because the coloring of the jaw and skull were different. This fact proves the British Museum and all of its hierarchy knew it was a fake and also that it was easy for any expert to know the skull was a forgery and that is why the museum refused to allow anyone to examine it.

This is an example of how a very powerful Darwin Conspiracy, led by atheists, fakes evidence, suppresses the truth and spreads lies in order to promote Darwinian evolution theory.

We are here to combat the Darwin Conspiracy that prevents you from easily learning about the latest scientific data and information that are related to evolution theories. We promise to do our best to provide you with only what is factual and true, without bias.

Unknown author, DarwinConsipiracy 13 Comments [8/22/2017 10:51:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130871

Evolutionists do not want us to teach in our public schools the science that shows the validity of creation. They want us to teach only their (with apologies to Rudyard Kipling) "Just So Stories."

Personally, I believe that we should teach evolution side-by-side with creation giving equal scientific emphasis and have our students learn to think critically. Let us show them both and allow them to decide for themselves which one they will believe because origins is a faith position. Evolutionists reject this two model approach to teaching about origins because they inherently know that they will lose every time.

If they will not allow the teaching in our public schools of the science to support creation and adamantly defend the teaching of evolution only, that is fine with me - as long as we teach the students more about evolution than the evolutionists do. If we teach students ALL about evolution then they will realize that evolution is intellectually bankrupt.

The solution to evolution is education!

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about the implications of the Laws of Science, such as the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics, and how these Laws disprove evolution. Please allow us to teach the truth about the whole and complete nature of natural processes, like photosynthesis and metamorphosis, and how these could not possibly come into existence by random chance. Please allow us to teach the truth about what is really in the ground, like the out of order layers and polystrate fossils, as opposed to what evolutionists say is in the ground.

Please allow us to teach the truth about the hoaxes and frauds that have been authenticated and perpetuated by evolutionists then later had to be retracted. Please allow us to teach the truth about: Piltdown Man, Java Man, Peking Man, English Peppered Moths, the Horse Series, Pithecanthropus alalus, Galapagos Finch Beaks, embryonic recapitulation and the Monera.

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about how the acceptance of evolution is the foundational justification to promote: human racism, homosexuality, abortion, euthanasia, lawlessness, pornography, and all the other immoral and unethical activities within our society.

Yes, I am convinced! We need to teach more about evolution in our public schools, not less!

With this admonition in mind, I want to give you a Primer on the Scientific Reasons that Evolution is Wrong. The following are only thirty basic points and are by no means the total list that we might make. This is just a list that you may refer to when you want a quick way to look up what is wrong with evolution.

1. The evolution of one kind into another kind is not happening in a measurable way in the present, nor can it be proven to have occurred in the past.

2. No new kinds of organisms are being observed coming from previously existing organisms. (We discover new kinds that we have never cataloged before, but this only shows our ignorance of their existence.)

3. No new structures or organs have been observed coming into existence. All observed structures or organs are fully formed when first observed. (The only observed changes to current structures or organs come from their decay and degradation.)

4. There are distinct gaps between the known kinds of organisms. One kind is not observed to change into another kind. We do not observe the "missing links" because they are missing, not there, don't exist.

5. Life only comes from life and reproduces after its own kind. Life does not come from non-living material. Life does not spontaneously generate itself.

6. Mutations, the supposed driving mechanisms of evolution, are random in nature and are neutral or harmful. They do not accumulate beneficially. Mutations produce the wrong kind of change and will not provide for the upward progressive increase in intelligence or complexity required by evolutionists.

7. We observe stasis, not change, in nature. Extinction is a proof of creation. We do not find change in the fossil record nor can we measure it in the present. Animal and plant kinds that exist today retain the same appearance but are smaller in size than their known predecessors.

8. The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced ("younger" and "older" layers found in repeating sequences). "Out of place" fossils are the rule and not the exception throughout the fossil record.

9. Polystrate fossils, fossils which penetrate two or more layers of the fossil record (most often trees), are common throughout the fossil record. In rare cases even large animal skeletons have been found in vertical position rather than in a horizontal position.

10. Life forms are found to be complex even in the "oldest" layers of the fossil record. For example, various species of Trilobites are found to have very sophisticated eyesight. Yet evolutionists say that these creatures supposedly evolved into existence when the first multiple celled life forms began to evolve some 620 million supposed years ago.

11. Nature does not provide us with the proof for the "Tree of Life" so glibly talked about by evolutionists. We do not find life starting as simple and then branching upward and outward as it becomes more and more complex. We do not find that life forms follow the pattern of a single tree trunk with many branches. The physical evidence provided by nature gives a picture of an extremely large orchard with all plant and animal types represented from the beginning with their own individual trunks and branches producing the variations within kinds that we have today, but no new kinds progressing from previous kinds.

12. There are no transitional forms found in the fossil record. In spite of all the reports people may have heard, we have never found the fossil of a plant or an animal which is a true intermediate form. The "missing links" are missing because they are missing.

13. Be wary of artists renderings. An artists depiction, conception or illustration is imaginary. Simply because we see an artists illustration of a cow becoming a whale doesn't make it so. Human desire and imagination are not evidence.

14. Ancient man was not primitive. Ancient human cultures had more complex languages than we do today. The engineering feats of the past cultures are well recognized and in some cases have not been duplicated in modern times. There never was a Stone Age, Bronze Age or Iron Age. Man has used stone, bronze and iron tools in all ages of past human activity. Indeed, there is nothing new under the sun.

The observed Laws of Science contradict the various theories of evolution.

15. The law of Cause and Effect not only describes that for every effect there must have been a cause, it also tells us that the cause must be greater than the effect. No one can create anything greater than themselves. You do not get an increase in intelligence or complexity without the input from a greater intelligence.

16. The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics work contrary to evolutionary belief. The First Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Energy Conservation) proves that the universe cannot be the reason for its own existence. According to the First Law the universe cannot have been anything less than it is, and if it cannot have been anything less than it is, it had to come into existence whole and complete. If the universe came into existence whole and complete, then it had to be created. Simply adding energy to a system will not cause an increase in intelligence or complexity. The addition of undirected energy to a system accomplishes nothing, except possibly for the destruction of that system.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Entropy) proves that evolution cannot happen. The Second Law stipulates (a poor attempt by scientists to describe The Curse of Genesis Chapter 3 and Revelation) that in all activities some of the energy becomes unavailable for further useful work. The universe is running down, not up.

17. The concept of a "Big Bang" producing the universe is absolutely illogical. Explosions do not produce ever increasing order and structure. Explosions produce disorder and chaos. Explosions break things down or destroy what was previously ordered.

18. There is no substantiated method in nature which would allow stars to be "born." The Gas Laws prove that the pressure of hot gases expanding outward from a center is far greater than the gravitational force drawing them towards a center. Stars could not evolve into existence.

19. The Law of Biogenesis (the Law of Life Beginnings) accurately states that life only comes from life, and that life only reproduces after its own kind. Life cannot spontaneously generate and life forms do not change from one kind into another kind.

20. The input of undirected energy accomplishes nothing. The input of undirected energy will destroy a system, not build it up. Only the input from a greater intelligence will cause a beneficial increase in order and/or complexity.

21. Not only must there be the input from a greater intelligence in order to produce an increase in complexity and/or intelligence, that intelligence must have a preconceived plan of action. No master craftsman would start to build without first having a plan, a blueprint.

22. In order for evolution to be true atoms must form useful molecules such as enzymes, amino acids and proteins by random chance. It is mathematically impossible for these molecules, much less the far larger DNA molecule, to form by random action in nature. It cannot happen!

23. Natural selection and survival of the fittest are supposed to be the driving forces of progressive upward evolution. There are no selective benefits for a supposed transitional form. There would be no advantage for a creature to have a half-evolved eye or a half-evolved wing. Indeed, the existence of such structures would be detrimental and serve only to eliminate, not perpetuate, such disfigured organisms from a given population.

24. The presumed intermediates required by evolution do not exist. The missing links are missing because they are missing. Reptilian scales do not/cannot become feathers. These structures originate from different cells within the skin tissue. Reptilian lungs do not/cannot change to become avian (bird) lungs. Air flows in and out of reptilian lungs just as in humans. Bird lungs have a flow through design.

25. Living organisms are incredibly complex and have specific design features. In order to make this point please consider the following partial list: woodpecker tongue, Bombardier Beetle chemistry, insect metamorphosis, Giraffe heart and arterial system, Gecko feet and human eyes (or human brains for that matter).

26. Single-celled organisms such as bacteria, amoeba and algae have the same degree of complexity within them that multiple-celled organisms have within them. Single-celled organisms have a skeleton, respiratory system, digestion and elimination systems, circulatory system, reproductive system, command and communication system.

27. Life forms are irreducibly complex. To code for RNA production within a cell you must already have whole and complete DNA. To make DNA you must already have whole and complete RNA. In addition, it requires about 70 proteins to fabricate a DNA molecule, but you must have whole and complete DNA to fabricate those proteins.

28. When we see design we know that there is/was a designer. The human mind intrinsically knows the difference between randomness and design. When we see a plastic hair comb, one of the simplest structures ever designed and consisting of only one part, we know that it was designed and made through intelligent effort. A plastic hair comb does not come into existence by random chance.

If we see three stones sitting on the bottom of a clear stream we know that they got there by the random action of the water current. If we see the same three stones piled up one on top of the other sitting on the bank of that stream we know that an outside intelligence placed them there.

We see design throughout nature. For good health blood must clot when it gets outside the body, but must not clot inside the body. In addition, it must stop clotting and not continue to clot once exposed to the outside. The molecular motors which turn the cilia of cells look exactly like little electric motors complete with bearings, shaft and housing. Our bodies must make decisions to accept or reject foreign substances or our immunological system does not work. Our bodies must also manufacture effective countermeasures without killing us at the same time.

29. Charles Darwin stated that the existence of vestigial and retrogressive organs and structures in the human body were essential proofs of evolution. It has now been determined that there are NO vestigial or retrogressive organs or structures in a human body!

30. Evolutionary theories remain incapable of explaining the existence of sex, symbiosis or altruism.

I reiterate that the solution to evolution is education! If we teach the true facts of science and teach our people to think critically they will never believe the Just So Stories of the evolutionists.

Besides, what is so dangerous about the facts that support creation?

A belief in creation destroys the works of the Devil!

That is what is so important about it and why evolutionists cling to their faith position concerning it. Evolution is a religion of conveniences. The acceptance of evolution is the only way in which people may mentally justify that there is no God. The acceptance of evolution is the only way in which they may mentally justify that they may lead a sinless life with Jesus Christ. The Bible declares that this is manifest delusion.

Unknown author, Creation Worldview Ministries  8 Comments [8/22/2017 10:51:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130869

I am really intrigued by the number of athiests who feel compelled to post on a Christian website,…come on guys, post to any of the suedo scientific sites that will have you. If just looking around doesn’t convince you that a huge intelligence made you and everything you see, there is little hope for you. Incidently, we Christians have the only thing that non believers will never have; a genuine hope for better things to come.

The agnostic and athiest world has NO hope of anything other than the forever dirt lunch. For those of you non-believers that are still with me, …hook up with a believer and see if you can learn the world of FAITH and begin to see a future for yourself. No more commentary is necessary,….this has been worn to a nub.

JOSEPH, United Church of God 7 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130868

No, it is evolution that is based off of zero real evidence. By contrast, the Bible is verifiable, had many many eye witnesses, and even those who lived in Jesus’ day and HATED Him could not deny the truth He preached and the miracles He performed because they saw it with their own eyes. I hope you did well on your test, but whether you believe what was on the test or not is irrelevant compared to what you believe about the God who made you and His Son who paid for your and my sins.

That is your real test, what will you believe, where will you make your stance? You need to decide if God exists or not, are you really so sure that you’re willing to bet your soul for all of eternity on the chance of an unproven theory from the 1,850’s when there is factual truth in all of creation in support of the Word of God?

Robert76, United Church of God 3 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130867

Can we prove that evolution is false without using the Bible? Certainly we can! Evolution is a scientific theory that stands or falls on the physical evidence. In fact, one can be an atheist, a person who doesn’t believe in God, and still not believe in evolution!

Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, as taught at school, is a biological explanation of how creatures have supposedly “evolved” or developed progressively through natural selection and variation (now known as mutation) over eons of time from the tiny cell to the largest creatures on earth today. What is taught in classrooms is not mere micro evolution—small changes within a species—but macro evolution, the change from one type of creature to another quite distinct life form.

What many evolutionists are trying to convince you of is that there is no need for a Creator since, as they say, evolution can substitute as the mechanism for creating and transforming life. They teach that life arose from non-life and evolved from simpler creatures to more complex life forms. In other words, the tiny cell eventually became an amoeba, then a lizard, then a monkey, and finally— you !

In order to remember key points that disprove Darwinian evolution—the “molecules to man” theory—we’ll use the acronym FALSE. (A few of these points also disprove the compromise of theistic evolution—the notion that God employed macroevolution over eons in forming the creatures we see on earth today.)

A fossil is the preserved remains of a living thing. The fossil record around the earth extends an average of one mile deep. Below this level we come up with a blank slate as far as living, complex creatures are concerned.

I collect fossils of what are deemed the earliest type of complex creatures with hard bodies—trilobites. No previous ancestors of these arthropods have been found. Similar to some marine “bugs” we see today on the seashore that disappear into the sand when the waves retreat, trilobites had hard shells, all the basic organs, and complex eyes like those of flies, with hundreds of sophisticated lenses connected to the optic nerve going to the brain. Trilobite fossils are found around the earth, and in all cases the level of rock beneath them does not reveal other creatures with similar features.

As one source states: “The dominant life form was the now-extinct sea creature known as a trilobite, up to a foot long, with a distinctive head and tail, a body made up of several parts, and a complex respiratory system. But although there are many places on earth where 5,000 feet of sedimentary rock stretch unbroken and uniformly beneath the Cambrian [layer], not a single indisputable multi-celled fossil has been found there. It is ‘the enigma of paleontological [fossil studies] enigmas,’ according to Stephen Gould. Darwin himself said he could give ‘no satisfactory answer’ to why no fossils had been discovered. Today’s scientists are none the wiser” (Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe , 1982, pp. 26-27).

Question: If, after almost two centuries of digging beneath all the world’s continents, no previous ancestor of this first hard-bodied creature has been found, how then did the ubiquitous trilobite evolve? There should be some previous ancestor if evolution were true.

It’s like finding an exquisite watch on the seashore and yet never finding any previous primitive models of the watch on earth. If you reasoned as an evolutionist, you would deny there was a need for a watchmaker at all, maintaining that time, water, sand, minerals and actions of the elements are sufficient to producing a fully functional watch that runs. This is part of the reason it takes more faith to believe in evolution than in a Creator!

Further important evidence from the fossil record is the absence of transitional forms between species. Darwin was concerned that the thousands of intermediate stages between creatures needed to prove his theory were not in evidence, but he expected they would eventually be found. Yet those thousands of missing transitional forms are still missing!

Another reference explains: “If throughout past ages life was actually drifting over in one continual stream from one form to another, it is to be expected that as many samples of the intermediate stages between species should be discovered in fossil condition as of the species themselves … All should be in a state of flux. But these missing links are wanting. There are no fossils of creatures whose scales were changing into feathers or whose feet were changing into wings, no fossils of fish getting legs or of reptiles getting hair. The real task of the geological evolutionist is not to find ‘the’ missing link, as if there were only one. The task is to find those thousands upon thousands of missing links that connect the many fossil species with one another” (Byron Nelson, After Its Kind , 1970, pp. 60-62).

The absence of transitional forms is an insurmountable hurdle for theistic evolutionists as well. It also fits with our next point.

When there is no real evidence, evolutionary scientists simply make assumptions.

If evolution were true, then where is the evidence of different types of animals now “evolving” into other types? Where is the evidence of cats, dogs and horses gradually turning into something else? We do see changes within species, but we do not see any changes into other species. And, as mentioned, we see no evidence of gradual change in the fossil record either. Yet evolutionists continue to assume that transitional forms must have existed.

In Darwin’s landmark book On the Origin of Species there are some 800 subjective clauses, with uncertainty repeatedly admitted instead of proof. Words such as “could,” “perhaps” and “possibly” plague the entire book.

Evolution is still called a theory—a possible explanation or assumption—because it is not testable according to the scientific method, as this would require thousands or millions of years. Evolutionists will counter that a theory is not a mere hypothesis but is a widely affirmed intellectual construct that generally appears to fit all the facts. Yet evolution in no way fits all the facts available. Evidence does not support it—and in many respects runs counter to it.

The law of biogenesis as taught in biology class states that only life can produce life.

You’ve probably heard the famous question: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? It’s a real dilemma for an evolutionist to answer. An egg comes from a chicken, yet the chicken comes from an egg. How can there be one without the other?

To complicate matters even more, the chicken has to come from a fertilized egg that has the mixture of two different genetic strains from both its parents. So the problem of the origin of life and initial reproduction is still a mystery that evolutionary science cannot adequately answer.

Yet for someone who believes in special creation by a Creator, there is no dilemma here. First God made the male and female chickens, which produced the first fertilized egg—and the rest is history.

When one living thing needs another different living thing to survive, it’s called a symbiotic relationship.

A good example of this is the relationship between bees and flowers. The bees need the nectar from some types of flowers to feed while these flowers need bees to pollinate them. Both depend on each other to exist and survive. The question for evolutionists is: How did these plants exist without the bees, and how did the bees exist without these plants?

Again, atheistic scientists are stumped. Theistic evolutionists are perplexed as well. Yet if you believe in a Creator who specially created the various forms of life on earth, the answer is simple—both were created at about the same time.

All living things are exquisitely engineered or designed. Qualitatively, a bacterium is as majestically built for its purpose as a human body is for its function. Yet evolution says it’s only an illusion of design—that there is no real designer behind it. Reality is not an illusion! Living things are multi-functional, which means they do many complex things at the same time, something evolution with its step-by-step process has never been able to demonstrate.

One example of a living thing with exquisite engineering is the tree. It provides breathable oxygen for us while processing carbon dioxide, which would in high amounts in the air be toxic to us. It supplies wood, housing for birds, roots to limit erosion, fruit and seeds to eat, is biodegradable and gives shade. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “A healthy tree provides a cooling effect that is equivalent to 10 room-size air conditioners operating 20 hours a day.” How could something so complex arise from a random, undirected evolutionary process?

Again, you need more “faith” to believe in blind evolution than in an all-knowing Creator who designed the marvelous tree in the first place.

Now you have five proofs that evolution is F-A-L-S-E and that special creation is true—and we didn’t even use the Bible. Remember the acronym FALSE when you read or hear about evolution—and do take time to read our Creator’s great book of truth! It has much to say regarding origins.

Mario Seiglie, United Church of God 3 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130866

Trump has fallen into line, lock step with Clinton’s ambitions. After all, Muslims are only untermensch and need our guidance or our help into the afterlife.

Squash ‘em like bugs because we are the heroes. “Thank you for your service” say the crawling politicians and also say the idiot citizens who should, in fact, be stringing up those same politicians and protecting our military from criminal adventures.

Predominately white, English-speaking, well trained and equipped somehow they have become the ‘victims’ of Muslim self defence.

It’s not fair? When 100 die for every 1 of ours. O thats right! They don’t have to find the cash, so they aren’t paying.

The emperor has no clothes and the Western world doesn’t utter a word.

Shame be upon us.

Steve Oz, Real Jew News 2 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130863

Adam Ford, Adam4d 13 Comments [8/22/2017 10:48:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 130862

Adam Ford, Adam4d 11 Comments [8/22/2017 10:42:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 130861

Adam Ford, Adam4d 13 Comments [8/22/2017 10:41:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 130857

Responding to a comment made by another member: "There is a supernatural hatred of both Jews and Christians in the world and country. There is nothing logical about it.

It's amusing to see the left claim it is a right-wing problem given all the antisemitism [sic] on its side from Muslims and blacks like Al Sharpton. The left is vehemently anti-Israel."

Jesus said it would happen.

It is caused by their hatred of God/Jesus/The Holy Spirit and the Holy Bible.

I will stick with God/Jesus/The Holy Spirit and the Holy Bible, over the liberals, democrats, leftists, evolutionists,
homosexuals, transgenders, feminists, Antifa's, Black Lives Matter groups, prochoicers, Muslims, KKK, White Supremacy groups, Non Believers, false teachers, blind guides, anti-Semitism groups, Communists, Nazi groups,

These groups have NOTHING to offer, but, sin, looting, rioting, protesting, hatred, anger, bondage and death.


dlo_3us2001, Realabortiondebate 18 Comments [8/22/2017 5:52:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 130856

(Commenting on an article posted entitled "CA Governor Jerry Brown Tried To Build A Liberal Paradise, But Now Residents Are Awakening To A HARSH Reality" - http://www.dcstatesman.com/ca-governor-jerry-brown-tried-build-liberal-paradise-now-residents-awaking-harsh-reality/)

People are leaving [California] BECAUSE:

Liberals are planning to secede from the USA. NO THANKS. I want to keep my USA citizenship.

Liberals are planning to go with Single Payer Health Plan, which will cost those over 65 double for their federal health through Medicare AND for the Single Payer Health Plan that every person will have to pay in CA. NO THANKS.

Liberals are planning to force Californians to buy solar for every house or business they own. NO THANKS.

Liberals are planning to STEAL your money anyway they can, through higher DMV's tags, taxes, higher gas prices, higher minimum wages which increases the price of burgers, pizza, dinners out, merchandise at the malls and stores.

We can't afford to keep giving our money away....so the baby boomers are bailing out.

So are some of the younger parents too. A young couple on YOUTUBE moved to BEND OREGON. They said they didn't want to raise their childreb [sic] in California.



dlo_3us2001, Realabortiondebate 9 Comments [8/22/2017 5:52:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 130854

One of my favorite movies growing up was Titanic. The sweeping scores, the beautiful scenes, and the cinematic replication of the ship and its inhabitants - what is there not to enjoy from this fictional retelling of the Titanic's maiden and last voyage?

One of the memorable scenes from this film is a moment in which the main character, Jack, and impoverished artist makes his way to the front of the ship with his friend. They go the very front of the ship on the main deck, Jack stands on the railings and declares, "I'm king of the world!" It's an iconic moment for the film, because two hours later, this man is no longer on top of the world.

We hear a line like "I'm king of the world," and it seems pretty harmless. However, this is a line I declare in my heart almost everyday, especially when I'm feeling particularly proud or things are going my way. Like, the main character of Titanic, I'm brought low by circumstances not long after, and my tune changes. I am not king of the world.

This line is actually an act of rebellion against God.

I'm not king of the world. I can't even control whether a day will be an encouraging day or a hard day. But I often believe a lie in my heart that I'm the king of the world, and that I can control things.

As we're learning about God and how He is the true King of the world, I'm encouraged and comforted when things seem out my control and dominion. It's because they are out of my control. However, if God is King and Sovereign over this world, I can trust that everything, my good days and hard days are under his control.

In these moments, I'm reminded of a passage from the book of Acts:
The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man, nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything. And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place, that they should seek God, and perhaps feel their way toward him and find him. Yet he is actually not far from each one of us. (Acts 17:24-27)
God made the world and everything in it and He is the Lord and King of heaven and earth. When things are going well or life is hard, I want the cry of my heart to be, "God's king of the world!" and find comfort in that truth.

Maudi, She Laughs Without Fear 11 Comments [8/22/2017 5:51:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 130852

Firstly, the New Right is based off the Nouvelle Droite from Europe, an ethnic nationalist reaction against demographic changes in the west.

There is no connection between "Kosher Conservatives", i.e Republicans, evangelical christians, British Conservative Party, libertarians with this. It grew in Europe in the 90's and 00's as an existential crisis about migration, ageing populations, removal of traditional architecture, Americanization, and populist dislike of conservatives and liberals. It spread to the US in the late 00's online

Trumpists only partially overlap. Most Trumpists are Republicans, who cannot be "New Right'. Early on a lot of New Rightists supported Trump out of hate of Republicans and his few decent ideas, such as saying the Iraq war was bad and comments against globalism (alt-right is anti-war and doesn't support the US military)

Most Rightists have given up on him even before the election. He came out in support of globalism, supports mega-capitalism, supports pollution, has a Judeo-Christian zealot as VP, gone on neocon forades in Syria (All new-righters support Assad). The alt/new right is against military intervention, nation building, excess consumerism, obesity, fossil fuels (American-style) Judeo-Christianity, Americanization of culture, neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and of course cultural left-wing stuff.

The alt-right wants a world in which Europe is inhabited by whites practicing native traditional culture, higher birth rates, the USA is isolationist (and possibly split up) and doesn't spread pop-culture, green energy, third position economics (no excessive capitalism or socialism), rebuilding traditional architecture, education and academia are pro-Western

Signaferte, Nymag 9 Comments [8/22/2017 5:43:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 130850

Not a homophobe here.

Your arguments are tired, though. The time has come to put misinformation in the past. Homosexuality is not genetic. The very idea is ridiculous and should have died in the crib.

Albanism is genetic. There are albino lab rats. We can produce them at will.

There are no gay lab rats, nor will ever there be.

Anorexia is not genetic. Homosexuality is not genetic. These are trauma-induced psychoses, and, like any psychosis, can be treated. Of course, we don't treat homosexuality anymore, but not because no one wants treatment. It is all politics.

econobombshell, Reddit - r/TodayILearned 10 Comments [8/22/2017 5:42:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 130849

Reminder: It's Over

When i was a bluepill i used to use okcupid. I took my best pictures, some from my hobbies, some visibly with other people to not look like a total loner. I tried to write my description properly and avoid general shit that say nothing. I liked on a lot of girls in my general area (read: continent), not just the best looking but also lower. My requirements weren't that high: don't be morbidly obese, be single and without children.
In 1 year i got 1 match. I messaged her with something more than "hi" then she unliked me. If you are sub 8, don't waste your time.

Lol you were bluepill as fuck. It makes me laugh all these average and ugly dudes putting so much effort into their profiles when Chad can literally upload a quick selfie, write absolutely nothing and fuck almost everyone he wants. At least now you have accepted the truth.

Watch out, data and facts trigger normies. Excellent post though.

Why even bothering trying at this point

you know for a fact that some noncel is going to look at the tinder graph, see that the average looking dude received 2 right swipes, and will type a condescending remark about how that proves we're wrong because "it's proof not all girls go for the good looking guys!"

various incels, r/Incels 5 Comments [8/22/2017 5:42:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 130847

"If you want to tear down racist monuments, you need to start with the living monument dedicated to white supremacy: Planned Parenthood."

Glenn Beck, Twitter 9 Comments [8/22/2017 5:40:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 130846

Some memories of my youth that should have been telltale signs for an incel future

Sixth grade:

Girls were playing a game where they tapped the crotch of dudes in class and other classes to mark them as theirs until another girl tapped them. As weird as it was, I really wanted to be part of it, but they only did it to the popular boys.

High school:

All of the boys and girls swapping their first school pictures with one another, but nobody wanted to give me one, or get one from me. I tried to give the girl I liked a picture and she threw it on the ground.

Still high school:

A girl in an unmonitored class (no teacher) started hitting me after I told her she was acting like a bitch. I started fighting back, and three chads/normies stood up and told me that if I hit her they'd hit me, forcing me to take her punches. For two years I was called a "bitch" for being beat up by a girl.

More high school:

Some normie stole an English test without the answers sheet, and asked if I could write the answers. After the entirety of the school took the test, some got caught with the answers I created, and tried to rat me out. I lied and said it wasn't me, but the boyfriend of a girl who got caught beat me up after school in an attempt to force me to confess to the school. Nobody ever mentioned the normie who stole the test. Jokes on them though: I told the school I created the answers, but didn't steal the test, and ratted out the normie who stole it. The guy ended up breaking out in tears in front of the gym teacher who was pressing him for answers. He got expelled, and I only got a warning (but I think my mom dying at the start of the school year might have provided me some leniency).

More high school because fuck it:

Boys and girls snickering in class when I told them how my mother died after they forced me to tell them, because they thought I was lying about it to score sympathy points.

There is much more, but the more I begin to remember the things I surpressed, the more I realize how true this place is.

Remember kids, if you don't want to end up like this loser, unloved and rejected, shower daily and work on your pEr$0nality.

In my country it is customary for men and women to greet by a kiss on the cheek. Not always, but it's common between people who see each other everyday, nothing romantic or anything about it. In high school, girls would do that to everyone with the sole exception of me, they'd only maybe say hi from 5 meters away if they didn't ignore me completely. Really that's how I should have realized back then that I'm seen as someone completely disgusting.

Holy fuck. Sigh. I am terribly sorry man. It's fucking over. This is our lives forever. I was reading something from yesterday about the universe might repeat itself and all this will happen again. We are cursed for always and eternity. I don't know why. Nothing can ever save us. We are stuck in this living hell forever.

So even death can't save us... that's actually the one thing I hope can take this misery away from me, so I'm going to choose not to believe what you wrote about it repeating. Fuck this.

Damn dude that's rough. Sorry about your mom. My mom was the only female to ever show any type of love to me.

Huh, I always thought my middle school was the only one that played that "game". In my old school the day after the nut tap the popular guys grabbed the girls' boobs. Pre-teens groping each other as a part of a """game"""

Kids are sexualizing each other from a young age, and it's around that time the bullying begins.

Fuck school... one of the worst years of my life and incredibly pointless and monotonous

You go there to learn how shitty humanity is

Rough stuff dude.

A girl in an unmonitored class (no teacher) started hitting me after I told her she was acting like a bitch. I started fighting back, and three chads/normies stood up and told me that if I hit her they'd hit me, forcing me to take her punches. For two years I was called a "bitch" for being beat up by a girl.

Damn, that fucking sucks. That's why we gymcel.

various incels, r/Incels 9 Comments [8/22/2017 5:40:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 130845

Most Southerners by now have seen the constant media coverage of the “Syrian Refugee Crisis,” where tidal waves of undocumented, Muslim immigrants have waltzed through the very heartland of white, Christian Europe. The liberal media have aided these people at every turn, making claims that these are just innocent refugees, trying to get clear of the fighting.

Yet, there remain several curious facts about these “refugees”:

First: 75% of them are young men, in their 20s and 30s, with very few women and children to speak of. Odd, right? You’d think if these were heads of households fleeing a scene of destruction, that they’d take their families with them. Yet most don’t have families with them.

Second: they don’t simply walk next door, across the Turkish border where there is no fighting, and hunker down. No, they walk all the way across Turkey and Anatolia, until they cross Europe’s Southern borders.

Once they cross those borders, do they stop there, where there’s also zero fighting, like real refugees would? No sir!

Even though by that time, they’ve been free of fighting for thousands of miles, they trek further, all the way up to Germany, the UK, or even Sweden.

Puzzling, right? Well, not if you happen to know the true explanation as to why hundreds of thousands of third world Muslims are trekking to just those three countries … Free Goodies

The real reason that this Islamic army is descending upon the hapless, white populaces of Christian Europe is quite simple. Merkel’s government in Berlin has offered very lucrative, financial benefits to any third-worlder who bothers to cross their border! Does that sound familiar? It should! For that’s precisely what Washington, DC, in all its corruption, is offering to hordes of Latinos. Simply cross the South’s border and voila: free healthcare, tuition, social security, voting status, drivers’ licenses, and other enormously lucrative benefits to each and every one … all at YOUR expense!

The hard truth is that both of these scenes, in Europe, and here in the South, on many occasions aren’t cases of “refugees” seeking shelter, or immigrants looking for an honest life. No, these are armies of invaders, because, make no mistake, these are invasions, plain and simple.

The radical, leftist governments of Western Europe and Washington DC are both acting against their own white populations, to ethnically replace them with third world populations willing to work for next to nothing. These governments care neither about their oaths of office nor the safety and well-being of their people.

They care only about bending over backwards to give away Western, Christian civilization to those who had nothing to do with building it!

The most disturbing aspect is that other than a few heroic political leaders, few others (with power) have the will to do what must be done to stop it.

Wait though! If you were thinking, “Well, at least we’re not getting flooded with Muslims like poor Europe is. It’s a good thing that wouldn’t happen here in Dixie…,” then I’m afraid I have some very bad news for you, friend.

President Obama is not content to merely destroy half the Middle East with pointless wars paid for with borrowed Chinese money—no. He’s now hell-bent on shipping hundreds of thousands of Syrian Muslims into the very heart of Dixie.

It’s true; the plans have already been revealed to bring thousands into the upstate region of South Carolina. Others are planned to be shipped into various parts of Tennessee and elsewhere.

Ask yourself these questions:

Do you think that bringing in several hundred thousand new human souls into our Southland is a good idea, when we don’t even have enough jobs for our own people?

Do you think that bringing in several hundred thousand Muslims into our Bible Belt is a good idea?

Can’t you just picture it: minarets, instead of steeples, springing up in the deep South, as you and your loved ones awaken to hear a Muslim call to prayer from the local mosque … just down the street from you?

Does this sound like a great future?

The Federal Government says it is, and they say you’re gonna like it, that you have no other choice.

Upon this point though, the League of the South disagrees with Washington in spades, and we’ve been doing something about it.

Several years ago, when treacherous corporations (and sadly, some liberal churches) conspired to bring Muslims to Murfreesboro, Tennessee, the League of the South stood alone, fighting back and condemning this unspeakable attack on the Christian, white South.

There were so many third world Islamic peoples brought into the quaint, picturesque town of Murfreesboro, that they even built a large mosque in the city.

We were not amused.

We organized a rally and called out the traitorous politicians who supported the ethnic replacement of their own Christian, Southern populace with third world, Islamic workers. We held up signs that said, “No Jihad in Tennessee,” because we knew the truth: sooner or later, when enough Muslims are allowed into a community, a radical, violent element will follow it. Always.

Sadly, we were vindicated in July 2015, when Mohammad Abdulazeez went on a shooting rampage, killing five servicemen in Chattanooga, Tennessee. While this killing shocked many in Tennessee, it did not shock us. How many more Southerners will have to die before we take back our Southern lands from those who insist upon replacing us?

The Federal Government calls Islam a “religion of peace;” the League of the South calls it a hateful, dangerous abomination that belongs nowhere in our Southland!

The Federal Government calls their act of bringing in hundreds of thousands of Muslims “an act of love.” The League of the South calls it an act of war on our Christian people!

The Federal Government says that Muslims will “culturally enrich” the South. The League of the South has seen about as much “cultural enrichment” that Muslims have forced upon other nations as we can stand!

We at the League of the South call upon Southerners to admit some very uncomfortable truths:

The truth is that this is no longer “the land of the free,” and Southerners won’t be free while under Washington DC’s occupation.

The truth is that DC is forcing the South (against its will) to take in these third world Islamic elements and at our people’s expense.

The truth is that Dixie’s sons and daughters have loved a country (the US), that has not and does not love them back.

The truth is that white Southerners are being ethnically replaced by millions of second and third world immigrants, who are driving down our wages, taking our jobs, and even committing violent acts against our own people. Enough is enough!

We declare that the South has already been overrun by too many foreign invaders as it is, and we don’t want or need any more of them!

We declare that if the South was a free and independent country, we could control and secure our own borders, here and now!

We declare that the South is our homeland, and no one else’s, because our people landed here and built this civilization from nothing.

We declare that since we built it, we should take true ownership of it by deciding who comes here and who doesn’t. Sounds great, right?

The problem is that as long as we remain shackled to a liberal, progressive country, headquartered by radicals in Washington, DC, we will never be allowed to decide our own immigration, border, or citizenship policies.

Washington will decide all those things for us, and you can bet your last dollar that they’ll continue to force these alien invaders upon us until you and your loved ones have been made minorities in the lands your fathers built. Does that sound like “freedom” to you? It sure doesn’t to us, either!

The only way to stop DC from replacing us in our own lands is to secede from this oppressive, liberal construct and assert our independence as a sovereign, Southern country in the 21st century.

It can be done, and unless you want to see minarets adorned with crescent moons in your town … it must be done. Our Southern children and grandchildren have no future if they remain shackled to the United States.

We are making our voices heard and reminding our people that they are not alone. We are here fighting for them and their futures, but we need your help!

The Southern people would be much freer, safer, and happier in a country of our own. This is our dream, and we are fighting every day to make it a reality.

Do you share this dream with us? If so, then will you fight for it with us? Join us today! We’re the folks you’ve been looking for!

Unknown author, League of the South 12 Comments [8/22/2017 5:40:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130843

Said it before, I’ll say it again; moslems should NEVER be in police, hospitals, anywhere in food preparation, government, or let’s face it–anywhere in the western world! They are here to kill us and/or take over! Most people are just terribly slow learners!

Peter35, Bare Naked Islam 4 Comments [8/22/2017 5:37:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130842

It was Over in Elementary School (Heartbreaking Story)

I'm not going to lie amd say my childhood was terrible, but it was obvious that it was over even then. Aside from having a borderline abusive father who I would have nightmares about, here's some examples.

Sometimes on the playground everyone in my grade would get together and play a huge game as a class. Whenever this happened, the entire grade would unite as one and gang up on me as a grade.

I also remember how some teachers would allow the child answering a question to lick who was next to answer. Despite eagerly waving my hand in the air, the other kids would always pick everyone but me. No matter what. This caused me tears.

I think the best example, although unintentional, is this. The following is an example of the universe mocking me. Around Christmas time, everyone was supposed to bring in a gift, then put that gift with others. Going in alphabetical order, each person in the class would walk over and take a gift. The catch is that there would always be 1 or 2 kids who didn't bring a gift, and I had a last name that was quite low in the alphabetical order list. So while all the other kids got to go home smiling with a new gift provided to them by a peer, I got nothing.

Inceldom was my destiny.

Me too, I was always ostracised even in primary school. Me friends were all fakes and didn't invite me to their birthday and I wrote something once and my teacher said the person who wrote that is a terrible student to the whole class. I really should have accepted my incel fate when I was 11

Every normie you pass by should be grateful you let them escape with their lives

Fuck man, I remember the same thing in my elementary school years. In fourth grade we had a secret santa and I brought this nice ass gift. 9 or 10 year old me had spent $30, which was a fortune to me at that time. Guess who ends up being the only kid not to get anything

Never be nice to anyone except for fellow Incels.

Yup. People underestimate just how much impact being bullied constantly making through school has.

IMO, it explains why some incels are actually decent looking. Almost all of them were late bloomers, and therefore bullied to hell and back due to it. You lose all confidence, you become shy and turtles with your emotions, you lose all interest in having a social life, and you become completely socially inept.

I'm less than average but still probably less ugly than some incels here who are 100% alone because of their look. I wasn't socially inept before being bullied, I was a loner but still had a lot of friends. Once I entered high school I had already developed a huge social anxiety problem I did not have before.

various incels, r/Incels 6 Comments [8/22/2017 5:34:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 130841

If I were to be run down or blown up by a Muslum maggot, I would want my remains plastered on all media with the words Muslum or Islam attached to it. Same thing with my loved ones. And no teddy bear vigils! I would want a Koran burning held at the site, if possible. Action on removing these followers of Allah out of our countries!

Az gal, Bare Naked Islam 4 Comments [8/22/2017 5:34:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130840

The War of Northern Aggression, 1861 to 1865, was a war where the South democratic rights were treated with contempt by the northern Yankee.

The vast majority in the South wanted to succeed from the Union, a Union that had been screwing them for sometime. Their will was suppressed, a people should have their democratic desires respected if the majority in a state want to succeed they should be allowed.

Yet the brutal Yankees suppressed and destroyed the great south. Our soldiers should be remembered for the great sacrifice, outnumbered 4 to 1 in manpower, 10 to 1 in GDP, no control of the sea and major nations such as France and the UK siding with the Yankees, they fought well.

Never forget that confederate spirit, it will never die.

Hank Junior, Bare Naked Islam 18 Comments [8/22/2017 5:33:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 19 | top