1 2 3 4 5 10 11 | bottom
Quote# 121389

SamHB, you're free to deny obvious bias against outspoken Christian athletes. But be aware that determined denials ultimately lose credibility.

Do you even deny that Tim Tebow was criticized more harshly, and more unfairly, than other quarterbacks? If you take your denial to that level, the loss in credibility will be complete. If, however, you admit that liberals criticized Tebow more harshly than others, then why do you deny it with respect to Gabby Douglas? Notice that you never provide an alternative plausible explanation for the unfair criticism of Douglas.

You say that liberals do not criticize their Christianity specifically, but it obvious why they criticize other things instead. If any liberal criticized someone directly for being a Christian, then the liberal would lose support. Liberals are not that dumb.

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 15 Comments [8/31/2016 6:47:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 121386

There is no law which requires a wife to obey her lawful husband, and so our society is filled with delinquent mothers without a man in the home because of divorce. Many women are becoming lesbians because they cannot relate to men anymore. Feminism has lobotomized them. All across the U.S. millions of young women in their early 20's with multiple children are looking for a husband. American women have become cantankerous nowadays, belligerent, difficult to live with because of feminist indoctrination which makes them oversensitive, intolerant and ultra-paranoid concerning their “rights.” The U.S. military is turning society's little girls into killers on the battlefield. It's a shame. Meanwhile America is dying for a lack of godly mothers and fathers. Public schools teach children their ABC's and 123's so they can work in a factory the rest of their life. A college degree means nothing these days if you expect to get a decent paying job with it. Whereas only 4% of people had a university degree in 1900, about 70% of people have college degrees in 2013... so what's the use of having a college degree if everybody has one? They are becoming worthless!

david j.stewart, jesus-is-savior.com 15 Comments [8/31/2016 4:29:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: PETF(People eating tasty fundies)

Quote# 121385

Attention #ISIS??? PLEASE KILL @JustinTrudeau FIRST. He's fucking gay. You don't know what that means. It's Ok.

Milo Infidel, Twitter 12 Comments [8/31/2016 4:29:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 121384

Like virginity, rape should be taken less seriously today: abortion, DNA testing eases the consequences of rape

We do not claim that rape is inoffensive and harmless. Rather, our point is that the advent of birth control, abortion, and DNA testing changed the consequences of sexual behavior. Just as virginity became almost irrelevant, rape has lost most of its terrible life changing consequences:
•Rape does no more make a women unmarriageable
•Rape does no more force a woman to give birth to an unwanted baby fathered by the rapist (there is always abortion)
•Rape does no more leave the actual or future husband unsure about paternity, if he is the father (DNA testing) nor put a husband at special risk of having a wife pregnant from a rapist (abortion, birth control)

Of course, constant feminist brainwashing, how terrible rape is, takes its toll. Constantly suggesting victims how terrible their ordeal was, becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy

Human Stupidity, Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception 22 Comments [8/31/2016 4:29:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 121374

The dictionary defines "modest" as: "Not offensive to sexual mores in conduct or appearance." The Greek word for "modest" means "of good behavior." You will one day be in horror to realize how many rapes, wife beatings and sexually perverted sins you caused because of the sinful desires you stirred in men's hearts. We see these whores in society today, with their bodies immodestly exposed, and they know exactly what they're doing. And it's wicked, dirty-rotten sin! Jesus taught in Matthew 5:28 that you don't have to actually commit fornication to BE GUILTY in God's eyes. Societies' immodestly dressed women are GUILTY in every sense! It's not just innocent fun, it's wickedness.

david j.stewart, jesus-is-savior.com 13 Comments [8/31/2016 4:25:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: PETF(People eating tasty fundies)

Quote# 121372

It’s Wednesday evening, and Mulhall has come to the Hub in Kilkenny to hear controversial South African pastor, Angus Buchan. Prior to the event, some 40 people marched to the gates of the venue to protest the fact that Buchan has preached in the past that homosexuality can be cured through prayer.

Rosemary Parle from Kildare and her friend Hilary Anderson from Lisburn describe themselves as Disciples of Christ. They have arranged their holiday together especially to coincide with Buchan’s appearance in Kilkenny. Why?

“It shows how much God loves Ireland. That’s why Angus is here, because God wants us to hear good news, among all the bad news,” Parle explains.

“Unfortunately, Ireland has become so liberal in its thinking that we have strayed from the teachings of the Lord and taken on a humanistic view instead. A homosexual lifestyle goes against the covenant of marriage.”

Even though marriage between same-sex couples in Ireland is now legal?

“That’s not marriage,” Parle says. “Marriage is one man and one woman. Their bodies fit together. I’m sorry to sound crude, but it’s true.”

A group of friends have come from Carlow. Before Buchan ever takes the stage, Maria Doyle says she has already got everything she came for.

“We’re meeting our family,” is how she puts it. “Say someone went away to Australia, and then they came home. The whole family would come together to celebrate. That’s what it’s like here.”

What do they think of Buchan’s views on homosexuality? “Homosexuality is a sin in God’s eyes,” her friend Julie Power explains. “Not the fact that two men love each other. The act. Sex together.”

By the time the event begins, the Hub, which has seating for 1,400 is full, including several children. Buchan jumps on stage and bellows, “I love the Irish, I really do! You are the most passionate people I have ever met.”

The crowd go mad. Camera phones flash.

“The Bible tells me to love my wife,” Buchan says. “I love my wife. If I love my wife, she will gladly submit to me.” He says this twice. The crowd roar.

These are some of the other things Buchan says:

“Abortion is legalised murder.” (This gets the loudest cheer of the evening.)

“You must discipline your children, and children, you must respect your parents.”

“Believers go to Heaven, not good people.”

“I will pray tonight that God will give a baby to all those people who can’t have babies, I have done this all over the world.”

Every sentence ends in a shout. In between cheering, the audience are totally silent.

Angus Buchan, Rosemary Parle & Julie Power, The Irish Times 8 Comments [8/31/2016 4:25:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 121370

[1925 vs 2016. 90 years later and we’re still policing women on what they wear to the beach.]

So, in 1925 women had to cover up and perhaps didn’t have a choice there. 2015 we have people trying to control a violent religion that oppresses women and forces them to completely cover themselves. If you think that these are the same thing then youre wrong. These are extreme measures to try to control an ideology incompatible with western values. Incompatible with the ideas that even would have inspired this post to begin with.

Im not sure whether or not I agree with the measures. One one hand I think that it genuinely does deter Islam and on the other I would want people to be able to make the choice. I do not however think that we need to be tolerant of extreme ideas that hurt others.

moderationinallthings, Tumblr 34 Comments [8/30/2016 4:21:30 PM]
Fundie Index: -1
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 121367

Have you heard the latest Democrat scam? Have you heard about the agriculture department's financial grants to lesbian farmers? You think I'm making this up? See, this is how they do it. All right. I hadn't intended to get into this right off the bat. Let me find it here in the Stack because it's something that's happening. It's actually real, and there is a strategic reason for it. Here it is. Are you ready for this? It's two pages. Let me pull 'em out here. It is from the Washington Free Beacon. That's the website.

Headline: "Feds Holding Summits for Lesbian Farmers -- USDA wants to change image of farmers from 'white, rich male.' The US Department of Agriculture is holding summits to promote the role of lesbian farmers as a part of its 'Rural Pride' campaign. The agency is working with singer and LGBT activist Cyndi Lauper for a 'day of conversation' about the struggles of gay and transgender individuals in rural America. [USDA] says its wants to change the perception of what it means to be a farmer in America away from the 'white, rich male.'"

Now, I understand farmers are not "rich." This is part of the disinformation campaign. "Rich, white male" is how the left describes pretty much any constituency group that they're opposed to. What the point of this is, folks... It's not about lesbian farmers. What they're trying to do is convince lesbians to become farmers.

You sit in there and laugh. Okay, go ahead and laugh at it, but I'm telling you what they're doing. They are trying to bust up one of the last geographically conservative regions in the country; that's rural America.

Rural America happens to be largely conservative. Rural America is made up of self-reliant, rugged individualist types. They happen to be big believers in the Second Amendment. So here comes the Obama Regime with a bunch of federal money and they're waving it around, and all you gotta do to get it is be a lesbian and want to be a farmer and they'll set you up. I'm like you; I never before in my life knew that lesbians wanted to be farmers.

I never knew that lesbians wanted to get behind the horse and the plow and start burrowing. I never knew it. But apparently enough money can make it happen, and the objective here is to attack rural states. They're already attacking suburbs, and that has been made perfectly clear by what happened in Milwaukee. They're going after every geographic region that is known to be largely conservative. They never stop, folks. They are constantly on the march.

Rush Limbaugh, Rush Limbaugh.com 31 Comments [8/30/2016 3:39:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: Skybison

Quote# 121366

Jinn possession of flats/buildings is common in ksa [Kingdom of Saudi Arabia].They remain empty for years to be rented and its quite famous that Jinns start to reside there.Second fact is as the Jinns mostly reside in deserts,jungles ,mountains & highways, but they do also live among human neighbourhood.Islam explains everything and also the solution.It is not always that the Sheikh can be able to convince them to leave the residential flat & situation ends by leaving the house and change it.It is advisable to do Istikhara & to consult neighbours when deciding to rent a house or flat if they r aware of any previous problems with the past inhabitants.
Witchcraft / Blackmagic is another phemonenon in which the sorcerer deals with these creatures by obeying them and ends by associating with Allah (shirk), then only the devils among jinnkind help the sorcerer and his/her clients.
It is important to differentiate the two entities, otherwise suspicions & insinuations will lead to superstitious nature of most muslims and they will be doubful when there exists some psychological problem or workout is needed to solve the commom problems we face in daily life.
May Allah bless the Ummah with Guidance , understanding & to solve these mysteries with Quran & Prophetic Method.Ameen

Dr.Mohammad Atif, Arab News 14 Comments [8/30/2016 3:38:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: TimeToTurn

Quote# 121365

Prior to the legalization of gay marriage, gay activists said that under no circumstances would an affirmative ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court on this issue result in a diminution of religious liberty. They were either wrong or they lied. No matter, no one now disputes that there is a determined effort to use gay rights as a club to smash the religious liberty protections afforded by the First Amendment.

Kate Drumgoogle was fired from Paramus Catholic High School in New Jersey last January after school authorities learned that she violated her contractual obligations. Now she is suing the school, the principal, and the Archdiocese of Newark claiming victim status; a judge has ruled that the case can move forward, denying a request to dismiss it. Drumgoogle was given the opportunity to resign, but she refused. The case has received nationwide attention, and that's because Drumgoogle is "married" to another woman, Jaclyn Vanore.

Drumgoogle was a guidance counselor and a basketball coach. When she took the job, she never disclosed her marital status, yet she agreed to abide by the school's Ministerial Policies and the Code of Ethics; they require adherence to Catholic teachings, among them being the stipulation that marriage is the union of one man and one woman.

No one knew of Drumgoogle's gay marriage until the sister of the woman she claims to be married to posted the information on social media. Elaine Vanore sent pictures of the ceremony to the Paramus Catholic Facebook page, the school's alumni page, and the page of school president James P. Vail. She did so following an argument she had with her sister, Jaclyn, the "wife" of Drumgoogle.

This case is not an anomaly. Dozens of lawsuits have been filed by gay employees against their Catholic employer, all alleging discrimination. The real issue here is that these gays have purposely violated their contract—an agreement to which they voluntarily consented—though no one would know this by following media accounts of these disputes. They have turned this into a persecution campaign by the Catholic Church.

It's not just gay activists who are trespassing on the religious liberty prerogatives of Catholic schools—the Obama administration is doing the same. Last year, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a complaint against a Georgia Catholic academy because it fired a gay teacher who planned to marry his boyfriend.

Every time something like this happens, we hear how indefensible it is to discriminate against gays as it is blacks. The conventional wisdom does not take into consideration a critically important difference: homosexuality, as opposed to the status of being a homosexual, is the issue; there is no analogue with race.

Gay teachers in Catholic schools are not being driven out because they are gay: they are being dismissed because they publicly flout Catholic teachings on the subjects of sexuality and marriage, and because they violated their contractual responsibilities.

Following the Bible, the Catholic Church rejects homosexuality; it also holds that marriage is a monogamous institution between a man and a woman. And just like secular institutions, it expects that the terms of its employment contracts should be honored.

The big mistake is conflating behavior (homosexuality) with an ascribed status (race): Behavior is an achieved status having nothing to do with a fixed status. As with all behaviors, homosexuality is subject to moral approval or disapproval. These judgments take on greater weight when they are grounded in Judeo-Christian precepts, the very foundation of the United States.

It should be further noted that the Catholic Church rejects "unjust discrimination," thereby acknowledging situations where just distinctions are warranted. So, too, does the larger society: there are many laws that treat people differently based on age (driving and voting), veteran status, handicapped conditions, and the like. The private sector does the same, as evidenced by height requirements for certain rides at amusement parks and "ladies night" privileges at pubs.

Regardless of how one feels about these matters, there is one overriding concern that should be controlling: the First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion.

Bill Donohue is President and CEO of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, the nation's largest Catholic civil rights organization. He was awarded his Ph.D. in sociology from New York University and is the author of seven books and many articles.

Bill Donohue, CNS News 30 Comments [8/30/2016 3:38:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 121364

Oh I believe you brother. My best friend is a full-blooded Filipino man who is an admirer of Adolf Hitler as well. He told me he wishes for Duterte to just "get it over with and declare martial law already". Back when Marcos declared martial law, the only people crying are the oligarchs and the spoiled city students of Metro Manila. The provinces benefited greatly. The people as a whole, will benefit from a president who is unafraid to make very difficult calls and do what needs to be done for his people, no matter what the cost.

MasculineHapa, Reddit 19 Comments [8/30/2016 3:37:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 121363

Evolution has been disproven. There is absolutely no basis for believe in it. Only racists believe in evolution. Hitler did. You didn't know who [Michael Faraday] was, and you didn't know that he was a Darwin contemporary. You also didn't know that evolution has yet to be proven (as evolutionists themselves will admit), and you didn't know that Darwin based his entire theory of evolution on the fact that he thought blacks looked like apes and that they must have "evolved". You can read about it in his books. Hitler cited him for his bigotry, too. You don't know science, and you don't know basic history.

Guest, Christian News Network 23 Comments [8/30/2016 3:36:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 121361

Polygamist leader Lyle Jeffs has escaped his home confinement — but his lawyer thinks there’s a possible supernatural explanation for it.

Salt Lake City news station Fox 13 reports that Jeffs’s defense attorney Kathryn Nester submitted a filing in court this week explaining that she is, at the moment, unable to contact her client. She then proceeded to explain that she had no idea what had become of him and speculated on some far-fetched scenarios to explain his disappearance.

“As this Court is well aware, Mr. Jeffs is currently not available to inform his counsel whether or not he agrees to the Continuance,” she wrote. “Whether his absence is based on absconding, as oft alleged by the Government in their filings, or whether he was taken and secreted against his will, or whether he experienced the miracle of rapture is unknown to counsel.”

Jeffs, who is the leader of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (FLDS), has been charged for his role in a food stamp fraud and money laundering scheme. He escaped his pre-trial home confinement this past June and has not been heard from since.

Kathryn Nester, Raw Story 22 Comments [8/30/2016 3:34:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 121360

(responding to story "Lawsuit filed against Chicago over abortion clinic “bubble zone”):

Pro-aborts and abortuary deathscorts cannot afford (insert picture of blood drenched money) to let the truth out.

But, the Truth WILL out!

WorldGoneCrazy, Live Action News 10 Comments [8/30/2016 3:34:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 121357

7 Ways to Discipline Your Wife

Discipline toward your wife should always start with the gentlest approach first and only move toward harder forms of discipline if the gentle approach does not yield results. Warnings should always be given before harder types of discipline are implemented. You should always pray and seek the Lord’s guidance before bringing these types of discipline on his wife.

Here are 7 ways you can discipline your wife if a gentle rebuke does not work:

#1 For Disrespect

If your wife is speaking in disrespectful and demeaning ways in public in front of others (whether this is toward you or others) this might require a public rebuke of her tone and actions.

#2 For Overspending

If your wife is spending money against your wishes – this may require confiscation of her credit cards and ATM cards. Of course this can be done in measured amounts. Perhaps you might just take away one or two cards that she has abused and if her spending continues to get out of control you would move toward removing the ATM card as well. This does not necessarily mean she would have no money, but you could give her a cash allowance each week.

#3 For failing to care for your children or contradicting your authority with your children

If your wife is failing to do her duties as a mother toward your children or she is continuing to contradict your authority with the children then perhaps you might put off buying that new car for her and have her continue driving her older car for a while as long as it is safe for her to drive. If you have to purchase another car – you could downgrade the type of car she will be able to get or buy her a used one instead. Maybe you put off the purchase of that new dishwasher she has been wanting.

#4 For too much TV watching

If your wife is watching too much TV you could cancel the cable or satellite TV and just have antenna service.

#5 For too much online time

If your wife is spending too much time online (like Facebook or other social outlets or online shopping) then if she does not respond to your warnings about this you could change your internet code on your router so that her devices will not have access to the internet.

#6 For neglect of the home

Maybe your wife is not watching too much TV or spending too much time online but she is still neglectful toward her duties in your home. If your wife is being neglectful of her duties to care for your home then you might put off that new living room furniture set you have been talking about or those new window dressings she has been wanting.

#7 For sexual denial

If your wife is un-submissive in the sexual arena and chronically denies your sexual advances (without legitimate medical or psychological reasons for doing so) then perhaps that upcoming trip you were going to take her on gets canceled. Maybe that wardrobe upgrade your wife was looking forward to gets downsized or canceled. The Bible says a man has to supply his wife with clothing, but it does not say it has to be the expensive clothing she wants!

Some of these disciplinary procedures may affect the family as a whole, but sometimes it is necessary to do this in an attempt to bring your wife to repentance.

These are just some examples of non-abusive ways that a Christian husband can discipline his wife in a way that honors God and his design for the home.

God not only give husbands the power to discipline their wives, but he also gives them to the duty to do this. Men should not discipline their wives out some sort of power trip or prideful arrogance. Instead men should discipline their wives from a place of love in order to bring about holiness and order in their homes. Even if a wife rejects her husband’s discipline as Israel did God as her husband – he should still discipline her and pray that God will bring his wife to repentance.

Larry Solomon (a pen name), Biblical Gender Roles. 33 Comments [8/30/2016 3:33:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 41
Submitted By: solomongrundy

Quote# 121355

Oh, I have the goods ;) ... God is proved by facts, science and logic. At the same time atheism (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) is easily destroyed by the facts and I'll list a few:

Nature (Bees making honey, flowers blooming, speciation, reproduction. gravity, time/space/matter) repeats daily, every 10 secs on every street corner; while the lies of atheism (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) do not repeat period AND THEY SHOULD because atheist scientists list them as "nature." They don't repeat like other things of nature, because they don't exist and never did exist.

Since the big bang never happened, what does the evidence for the big bang point to instead? The fact that God created the Heavens from one point and expanded them (documented in his word over 3500 years ago):

"He alone STRETCHES OUT the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea." Job 9:8.

” … who STRETCHES OUT the heavens like a curtain, and SPREADS THEM like a tent to live in.” - Isaiah 40:22

"In the beginning (time [past, present, future]) God (intelligent force [Father, Son, Holy Spirit]) created (action) the heavens (space [height, width & depth]) and the earth (matter [liquid, solid, gas])." – Genesis 1:1

NOTHING CAN ONLY PRODUCE NOTHING. It's impossible that purposeless mindless unguided NOTHING created EVERYTHING from NOTHING. Everything came from God. There is no other option.

"Time" does not help evolution as "time" does not add new information to the genome (DNA) to make a life form

Any person that can create time, must be timeless. Does someone "timeless" have a beginning? No. THEREFORE God is "timeless" or eternal. He designed/created time/space/matter/energy ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

The only option for the design/creation of the high-complexity/high function human being, is a brilliant divine God. It's impossible that MINDLESS UNGUIDED processes (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) designed/created anything.

God is THE ONLY ONE that has life, intelligence, morality and value to give us AND the tools (divine power & divine brilliance) to give it. LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, MORALITY AND VALUE CAN COME FROM NOBODY ELSE as God designed/created us in his image:

Genesis 1:26.. “Then God said, "Let us (Trinity: Father, Word, Holy Spirit) make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."

Life could not of been created in stages and survived, because along w/ the ability to reproduce, life had to have all bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intact to survive and progress. This fact proves life was created SUDDENLY as depicted in The Book of Genesis, while at the same time destroys atheism (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution).

jacuzzi37, Christian News Network 24 Comments [8/30/2016 3:06:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 121353

“Science, fundamentally, is a game. It is a game with one overriding and fundamental rule. Rule No.1: let us see how far and to what extent we can explain the behaviour of the physical and material universe in terms of purely physical and material causes, without invoking the supernatural” (Chemical evolutionist Richard Dickson)
That's the sort of science that has brainwashed many a persons into believing we are nothing more than meat that has arisen from protoplasmic sludge and that we have no more significance than a cockroach. At the same time, falling into satans trap (Jesus refers to him as the father of all lies) causing men to reject Gods merciful offer of grace and thus being damned for all eternity.

George, Christian News Network 10 Comments [8/30/2016 3:05:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 121351

You may think I am joking but I am not. I cannot watch a woman preacher without lusting after her in some way or another even if it is for only a few seconds and that is the reason I believe that women should not be on the stage in front of men preaching. A woman does not lust after men but men lust after women and you cant listen to a sermon while checking her out, it is just wrong.

James of Arc, Christian Forums 35 Comments [8/30/2016 3:05:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 121342

God does NOT bless sin.

The only industries that thrive in the hood are the ones that cater to single unwed mothers. In other words: businesses that cater to fornication. Sadly, this also includes many churches! Think about it: what do beauty supply stores, liquor stores, day care centers, hair salons, nail shops, income tax businesses and churches all have in common?

They all cater to low income single women and unwed mothers. And by definition an unwed mother is someone who indulges in fornication - which is how she typically ends up as an unwed mother. The single women aren't any different. Most of them are living lifestyles of fornication too. They either hide it by getting abortions, or they simply haven't got caught slipping yet.

The 'hood caters to single mothers and SIN. Which is precisely why it has become a death trap for so many: especially black men.

The hood is really just reward for rebellion against God. Women these days have rebelled against God's assigned authority: Male Leadership. This is why they value the man's penis, but not his position as leader. They value his 'head' but not his headship. Let that one sink in for a moment.

In their often extreme pride and arrogance, many of these women actually expect God to bless their lifestyles of fornication and rebellion. They expect for God to make their lives better, when they're not even repentant for their own lifestyles of sin. No repentance for fornication, none for adultery, none for being lascivious, none for abortion.

It's the kids that end up suffering the most, because they are the fruit of that fornication. They're fornication babies and for all intents and purposes, bastards.

This doesn't mean God rejects those children; for He already declared 'he that comes to Me I will in no wise cast out.' But it does mark these kids of fornication as outside of the protective covering that comes from a home that is led by a man.

The man has been assigned headship by God. It's an anointing that each man carries, whether saved or unsaved. Not even Satan can violate or step over that assigned authority.

Now you know why Satan wants to remove men from homes so badly. He can only gain access to the home and therefore the children when the man is not present. Headship which equates to leadership belongs to the MAN - not the woman. A special blessing rests on families that are led by a man. Heterosexual man, that is. (It's a shame we even have to differentiate nowadays).

This is why single parent households ran by women are so disastrous to the black community. These are the leading cause of most of the crime, poverty, high incarceration and high school dropout rates. But at the center of it all is one word - rebelliousness. And that rebelliousness finds its biggest expression via sex outside of wedlock - aka FORNICATION.

While I agree that much of this can be laid at the feet of men as well; I'm an absolute realist: most of the men who mess around with women from the hood are hood dudes themselves.

Hood dudes are basically guys who were raised by single moms too - who rarely ever knew their own fathers - and now they are here repeating the process into the next generation.

Hood dudes aren't men who've abandoned their families. They simply never were a family in the first place. Mom was just a sex fling who wanted to get pregnant (why else take that risk of getting pregnant when a woman has over a dozen different ways to prevent pregnancy). And dad was just a guy from the neighborhood in search of an easy lay.

That's not a family. That's called fornication. And you can't expect a man who's a sinner to suddenly start acting like a saint, just because he's had sex with a woman. That's what whoremongers do - frequent whores! After all: a man can't be a whoremonger unless he's among whores, right? Hence the definition of the word.

Decent men, the marrying type, aren't hanging out in the hood all day, or sponging off of some woman and her kids.

Decent men are busy earning a living and being productive with their lives.

The only men you see constantly in the hood are:

• guys needing a place to stay because they're too immature to stand on their own two feet economically at the moment;
• drug addicts, winos, bums;
• broke gay/bisexual dudes who are known to be gay, who also have HIV (this is where many black women catch it from);
• drug dealers

All other men do their best to steer clear from the hood. Because they realize the urban black community operates as a deadly matriarchal society - something that is antithetical to real manhood. And no real man can be comfortable for long in a matriarchal environment. Sooner or later he's going to break camp too, just like the other decent men before him. Unless he fits that category mentioned above.

BOTTOM LINE: the hood with all its crime, death, brutality, violence, failure and poverty is the direct result of the judgment of God on all those women who don't want to do things God's way. It's an environment for spiritual rebels. And it won't get any better - not until there's wide scale repentance. You cannot violate God's divine order unrepentantly without expecting lots of negative repercussions.

The only kinds of businesses that tend to thrive there are ones that cater to a single unwed mother demographic. Which again includes many churches. Why else are so many churches filled with single unwed mothers every Sunday, with very few single men present? I posit that it's for the exact same reason why you find mostly women in beauty supply stores, daycare centers and nail shops: because those are places that cater to women in sin by making money off or attempting to ease their suffering.

If churches really wanted to be effective, they would preach a strong message of repentance from sin, living godly lives and exhibiting holiness. But here's the rub: most women currently attending church don't want to hear that! They'll attend church, become members, even pay tithes - so long as you don't touch their precious sexual sins! Once you start calling out their sins, they'll start exiting the church, and most likely end up down the street attending a rival church: all out of rebellion!

I'm just being real.

Many churches deliberately keep black women single by refusing to address their real problems and root issues.

The root issue these women have is sin - in particular sexual sin. And pastors know this. Which is why they'll often do slick things like verbally attack men with strong messages of stepping up to the plate, yet treat women with kid gloves.

This is easily understood when looking at it from a business perspective. Men aren't a church's main financial demographic. Women are. So it's easy to sacrifice a handful of men in order to make the women happy.

Male-bashing has always proven to be an effective sales tactic when marketing to women. And it's no different in a large number of churches.

It's time for a genuine Holy Ghost revolution in the black community today! I hesitate to even call these areas 'communities' because a community is built upon solid families. And when there are few husbands and fathers present in the home, that's not a family at all. It's an anomaly.

Strong families cannot be built upon the backs of women. That's out of divine order and will never fly. Just look at the black communities today where women are the 'backbone' for all the proof and evidence that you need. These areas are a wreck today - because only God's way works!

We must stop championing ignorance and dysfunction and start promoting a strong, robust spirituality that can anchor us to solid morals. Only with this type of foundation can we build real communities that are strong relationally, economically and politically. Our children deserve better than this.

Mack Major, Eden Decoded 29 Comments [8/29/2016 3:27:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 121340

Arguing with women is a losing proposition.

You're only going to make them hate Asian men more.
Our arguments could not be more logically sound.

But Asian women, like all women, have the ability to believe their own lies if it's beneficial to them.

It is advantageous for them to depress the value of Asian men. They can hold out for higher quality

Asian men when they have white men as leverage, or vice versa.

The best strategy for Asian men is to individually and collectively raise our sexual value with non Asian women.

Simultaneously, we should demand 100% race loyalty history for marrying Asian women.

If every Asian male in America does those 2 things, our situation will improve without a single verbal argument being made.

That would more closely resemble patriarchy, which actually does work to keep women in line. Look at Muslims.

We are the least patriarchal because our women have the most freedom.

Right now they have the freedom to fuck the whole football team and still marry a clueless

Doctor/engineer/Harvard Asian male provider when they're used up.

Whites, blacks, Hispanics would never marry a girl of their race who had exclusively fucked 40 Asian guys first.

macnjack, Reddit 17 Comments [8/29/2016 3:26:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 121339

The thought process of an atheist is a list of irrational beliefs and a way to put off God. Be amazed at the evidence around us at www.AtheistMovie.com

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 46 Comments [8/29/2016 3:26:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 121337

Two prominent religious leaders in Russia have provoked outrage after suggesting female genital mutilation could help reduce sexual promiscuity.

The scandal erupted on Wednesday when Vsevolod Chaplin, a former spokesman for the Russian Orthodox Church, rushed to the defence of Ismail Berdiyev, a senior Muslim cleric from Dagestan who said “all women” should be subjected to the practice to eliminate sexual depravity.

Mr Berdiyev, chairman of the Coordination Centre of North Caucasus Muslims, made the controversial comments when asked to comment on a report into the practice published earlier this week.

“All women should be circumcised so there would be no debauchery on earth, so that sexuality is minimised,” Mr Berdiyev, a prominent figure in Dagestan, told a correspondent from Interfax, a Russian news agency.

“The Almighty created woman to bear and raise children,” he added. “[Circumcision] would not affect that. Women would not stop giving birth. But there would be less promiscuity.”

He went on to clarify that although Islam does not prescribe the practice, “it is necessary to reduce female sexuality. If it was done to all women, it would be very good.”

Mr Berdiyev was commenting on a recent study that found female genital mutilation is common in remote mountain villages in Dagestan, a predominantly Muslim region in Russia’s north Caucasus.

Research by the Russian Justice Initiative, an NGO, found that in areas where the practice continues female genital mutilation tends to be carried out on girls up to three years old, without anaesthetic and often in unsanitary conditions.

The researchers said most cases they came across involved removal, or part-removal, of the clitoris and labia.

Archpriest Chaplin, one of the most prominent Orthodox priests in Russia, rushed to the mufti’s defence after outraged headlines splashed across Russian media and social networks.

“What feminist howling!” he wrote in a Facebook post defending the right of minorities to preserve religious traditions.

“Circumcising all women probably isn’t necessary. Orthodox women don’t need it because they are not promiscuous,” he wrote.

“Of course God created women to bear and raise children. Feminism is a lie of the 20th century,” he added.

Ismail Berdiyev and Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, The Telegraph 50 Comments [8/28/2016 5:28:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 121336

We may reasonably suppose that the first six civilizations were founded by high IQ peoples. Their homelands are now all occupied by low IQ peoples, as for example Egypt and the Indus Valley. And any smart people currently in the vicinity of the Indus valley are descended from foreign invaders who conquered a low IQ population that had lost or was losing the capability to operate cities and irrigation.

The Maya created writing and the positional number system, and used it to accurately predict the motions of the moon and sun. Their descendents were for the most part homeless nomads, their largest city being two hundred mud huts. Their great cities were abandoned, even when they commanded key resources. The descendants of the Maya are obviously incapable of operating a great civilization, indeed, without white rule, could not even have cities, or political units larger than tiny tribes with poorly defined territories. They wound up running naked through the jungle with pointy sticks to the extent that they had any jungle.

You would think that positive eugenics is natural in a civilization. The smartest people get to the top, command and effectively utilize all the good stuff, so have more surviving children. And sometimes it does work like that.

But if the smart people are the ruling and fertile people, they will proceed to ensure that their smart children get all the top jobs. This will disturb the topmost rulers, who would like to have limitless freedom to appoint obedient people to the good jobs, regardless of ability, and more importantly, regardless of family. In particular, they would like the freedom to not appoint the sons of powerful rival families. If you have a bunch of fertile smart industrious men inserting their kids into the top jobs, then you wind up with aristocratic or semi aristocratic system. The Bishop is succeeded by the Bishop’s son, which bothers the pope no end. The colonel is succeeded by the colonel’s son, which bothers the general, which bothers the King. One drastic solution, popular in China, is to give the top jobs to eunuchs. You want a top job, have to give up your man parts. Note the striking similarity with today’s political correctness, which requires metaphorical castration of males, and prefers literal castration of males.

Affirmative action for women makes a lot more sense when we recall that working women, unlike working males, do not reproduce, therefore will not be succeeded by their children. If you are a ruler, able (aristos) fertile patriarchal families are a problem, working women and eunuchs are the solution. And if the very smartest women are not all that bright, all the better, will be less capable of plotting against you. So the smartest females do not reproduce. Even if working women are substantially less productive than working men, working men are threat, working women are not a threat. Similarly any measures to prevent the affluent white male children of affluent white males from getting ahead. Such measures are rationalized in the name of social justice, but such measures give the most powerful more power.

From the point of view of the emperor, eunuchs are a better solution than working women, since eunuchs are substantially smarter than women, and have zero offspring, not merely near zero offspring.

A system of rule by the best (aristos) will, if the best are fertile, tend to become hereditary or semi hereditary. Thus patriarchy plus meritocracy will give rise to aristocracy, because affluent patriarchs have numerous sons, the meritocrats start running the system as a job placement program for their numerous sons, and the Pope will not be happy. Conversely, when the King tries to do stuff to make it less hereditary, he is apt to make the best less fertile.

One would suppose the mandarinate to be eugenic, and indeed China, unlike other civilizations, has not become a low IQ wasteland. But mandarin exam was corrupted to select for grinds rather than smarts. Any test can be gamed. The more that scoring high in the test matters, the less predictive of accomplishment it is. Thus selecting people on the accomplishments of their family and recent ancestors is apt to produce more accurate predictions than over reliance on an examination system. If the outcome of an IQ test has little direct effect on your career, it will accurately predict accomplishment. If you hand out nice jobs on the basis of an IQ test, considerably less so. If nice jobs are handed out on the basis of the test, the test is apt to become a marathon of rote memorization, which is what happened with the Chinese mandarinate exam. But for obvious reasons, emperors were unenthusiastic about handing out nice jobs on the basis of family accomplishment, for accomplished families are rivals.

Fertility in our civilization is of course massively dysgenic, because women are artificially placed in the workforce and education, with the most able women being most forcefully helicoptered into courses and jobs far beyond their ability.

As “Smart and Sexy” demonstrates, our mandarinate exam (the SAT and LSAT) has been jiggered to avoid selecting too heavily for ability. If, however, our mandarinate exam was fixed as proposed in “Smart and Sexy”, and if we had patriarchy, our civilization, like the Chinese, could avoid becoming a desolate wasteland of low IQ savages running through the woods with sharp sticks. And it would not be hard to make our mandarinate exam better than the traditional Chinese mandarinate exam.

The Chinese communist party currently selects on test results, on family accomplishment, and on individual accomplishment. This is likely to give substantially better results than the traditional Chinese mandarinate exam. Unfortunately they also are affirmative actioning women, probably for the same reasons we are, and this is producing significant dysgenesis in China.

Jim, Jim's Blog 17 Comments [8/28/2016 4:06:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 121335

Ultra-Orthodox Jewish rabbis have banned women from going to university, The Independent has learned.

The strict Satmar sect issued the decree, seen by The Independent, warning that university education for women is “dangerous”. Written in Yiddish, the decree warns: “It has lately become the new trend that girls and married women are pursuing degrees in special education. Some attend classes and others online. And so we’d like to let their parents know that it is against the Torah.

“We will be very strict about this. No girls attending our school are allowed to study and get a degree. It is dangerous. Girls who will not abide will be forced to leave our school. Also, we will not give any jobs or teaching position in the school to girls who’ve been to college or have a degree.

"We have to keep our school safe and we can’t allow any secular influences in our holy environment. It is against the base upon which our Mosed was built.”

The decree was issued from the sect’s base in New York and will apply to followers of the faith group around the world.

Satmar Rabbis, The Independent 34 Comments [8/28/2016 3:56:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 121334

Jesus spent a large portion of His time on Earth casting out demons. There were instances when He would cast a demon out of someone before He could heal them from their sickness or disease.

He even rebuked a fever inside of someone before the person could be healed.

"So he bent over her and rebuked the fever, and it left her. She got up at once and began to wait on them." Luke 4:39

To rebuke someone means to yell at them to show your disapproval; it means to give a severe reprimand or to scold harshly. You don't rebuke inanimate objects or non-living 'things.' You only rebuke something that is alive like a human - or an animal that has basic intelligence and understanding.

So in order for Jesus to rebuke a fever, the fever would've had to be something that was both alive and intelligent enough to understand and respond to the rebuke.

This is interesting, because it suggests that some illnesses, sicknesses, symptoms, ailments, viruses and diseases are actually intelligent living creatures hiding within a person's body, with the ability to think, act and respond.

Maybe the reason why there seems to be no cure for cancer yet is because we fail to understand the nature of what a cancer actually is. Perhaps instead of poisoning the cancer out of someone's body via chemo, we need to focus first on casting the cancer out of the person via Christ.

In other words: instead of treating cancer like an esoteric *it* - start treating cancer like a living intelligent thing that has the capacity to respond to those who rebuke it with confidence in the authority of Jesus Christ.

After all: if a fever can be *rebuked* out of a person, certainly cancers can too.

Mack Major, Facebook 25 Comments [8/28/2016 3:48:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 | top