1 2 3 4 5 6 | bottom
Quote# 140009

Years ago, I had sex with my friend's much younger sister and it set her on a path to becoming a huge slut

Before anything else, let me just give you the story of what happened. I was 16 at the time, so was my friend. Me, the friend, and another girl were at the friend's house and thought we were alone. We were fucking around and watching porn on her computer and laughing about it and shit like that. We came to a video of a girl eating out another girl in front of a whole party. We watched that one for like a half hour and we all thought it was hot. We joked about it and "reenacted it", like not actually eating pussy but licking our shorts and just being stupid like that. Anyway, later that day I was alone with the friend's sister and she told me she was watching us the whole time and she loved it. She told me she wanted us to do what the girls in the video were doing. I guess she asked me cause she knew i was bi and a pretty big slut anyway.

I dont know why exactly, but I was fucking excited about it. I thought it was going to be a lot of fun teaching this girl about licking pussy. So I got some good porn together later and gave it to her and told her to watch it and get comfortable with it and get comfortable with herself and we'd talk later. Apparently she watched that stuff every night for a week and just devoured it. She talked to me a week later and said she had the house to herself for a whole weekend. Her parents, sisters, and brother were all away at different places and her parents were ok leaving her for 2 days alone.

So we had our chance and I came over Saturday at like noon. We watched some of the porn together and talked about it and made sure she was comfortable and excited, and she definitely was. Over the next hour or so we kissed, made out, got naked, and I let her do and look at whatever she wanted. Eventually, she wanted to get her mouth on my pussy and I walked her through how to eat me out. After some coaching, she was able to get me to orgasm and she was so fucking happy. She wanted me to do the same to her and I did for a bit but for some reason couldn't get her to orgasm. Maybe she was just nervous or whatever. It was a crazy day.

After all that, she started the habit of making out with all her girl friends, because it was fun or sexy or for attention or whatever. She loved the attention from boys a little too much and started having sex way more than a girl her age should and she's not slowing down to this day. Her sis still has no idea what turned her sister into a bi slut at that age.

And I didn't mean to leave her age to the end but I just realized i didn't say it. That day was a week before her 12th birthday. Maybe you think I'm a monster or twisted perv right now and fuck maybe I am. I don't know. I feel kinda bad about the whole thing but honestly I think i feel worse about the fact that i don't feel as bad as i should about it. I'm a little worried i'm really messed up and want to hear other people tell me what they think.

tiffmck, reddit 4 Comments [8/23/2018 8:29:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138615

8 Factors That Are Destroying Healthy Relationships Between Men And Women

Corey is an iconoclast and the author of 'Man's Fight for Existence'. He believes that the key to life is for men to honour their primal nature. Visit his new website at primalexistence.com

Most men, even if they’re still swimming in ocean of blue pills, have some awareness that something has gone awry with the relationship between men and women. Statistics prove this as well as divorce has been epidemic for a while now with record-number of children growing up with single parent around the world while young people are having less sex than before. And whether you be a feminist or part of the manosphere, I think both sides can agree on one thing: that a war between the sexes have been heating up in the recent years.

Why is all this happening? While men and women tend to play the blame game to avoid taking any responsibility, there are greater forces at play. The fact is, the continuing transformation of our society is making the antagonism between the sexes inevitable. Feminism is just a symptom, not the cause of our problems.

Before we look at why today’s sex relations are in a dismal state, consider the single factor that makes relationships prosper: Mutuality based on different but compatible roles.

All relationships work best when two parties have something different to share for their mutual benefit. For example, humans and horses have enjoyed a close relationship together throughout history (unlike, say, humans and bears). The relationship works because in exchange for food, protection, and care that humans provide, the horses offer themselves as transportation.

The relationship between men and women was also mutually beneficial for the entirety of human existence with men offering their services in exchange for having the women bear their children. But now, with the advent of modern society and its conditions, things have changed drastically.

1. “Equality”

At least these men had their male privilege.

“Equality” for women is the most abominable lie to have ever perpetuated on mankind.

Men have always provided for women. Men hunted for food, labored to build everything, and fought battles to defend their tribe. To say that men oppressed women throughout history is an insult to all those who sacrificed themselves in the factories, the coal mines, and the trenches. If women didn’t have certain rights that feminists like to cherry-pick, it’s because women weren’t drafted to fight wars. In exchange for their toil, the only thing men asked of women was to be supportive in their roles as wives and mothers.

But fast-forward to today, now that women have “achieved” social and political “equality” and even various advantages just for being born a female, many women today no longer feel that it’s necessary to exchange values with men for mutuality. It’s like when humans developed automobiles and didn’t need horses anymore. The difference is, humans and horses don’t need to be together; men and women do.

However, men’s sexual desire—which is greater than that of females—is still alive and kicking. So what we have today is a situation where women have gotten their social equality while sexual inequality persists for men (which is why many men choose to give up sex entirely to level the playing field). This is what happens when you standardize human beings into economic units.

2. Education and career over family

Stressed out from balancing between work and family? Yup, it’s the men’s fault that you tried to do both.

To maintain their advantage over men, women today are dedicating themselves to their education and career. Western women, in particular, have been so thoroughly sold on the idea of status and consumerist orgy that they are no longer interested in relationships. More and more women today are delaying marriage (if not outright rejecting it). And when they do get married, they are using it as a means to trap men into donating their sperm and cash, only to bail out when they want to.

3. Slut culture

Wow, what an achievement! I’m sure your failed parents are just as proud.

The advent of contraception and the decimation of whatever feminine decency that was left has turned the vast majority of young Western women into drunken sluts. The increasing number of sluts is diminishing the availability of quality women that men want to start a family with and has social implications for the society as a whole.

4. Government supplanting men

The only way women were able to “liberate” themselves from their supposed oppressors was by latching themselves on to a new alpha provider: the government. As said before, men form relationships with women by exchanging values, with his strength to provide and protect being his greatest asset. But now, the government (along with corporations and education system) fulfills those roles that men previously occupied. And not only that, but the government is deeply involved in the affairs of marriage, sending professional white-knights to extort and arrest men who’ve been used up and thrown away by women.

It also doesn’t help that the government is increasingly monopolizing violence, one of the most important value that a man possesses. And that leads to my next point.

5. Too few wars, too many men

I doubt these men had to think of ways to entertain women like a monkey to get their attention.

The recurring theme across patriarchal societies of the past and present are violence and warfare. And the most commonly associated traits of masculinity are also traits of warriors such as strength, bravery, aggression, discipline, and so on. It’s quite simple: the more violent the environment is, the more masculine men become. And the more conflicts and wars there are, the more the women depend on men—thus keeping the collective value of male population high.

It’s no coincidence that Western societies have started to feminize as they endured decades of relative peace since the end of WWII. The lack of warfare also means that there are now more young men per woman (practically 1 to 1) than there normally would have been under a warring society. Excess of men—who are also emasculated and feminized—means that the collective value of average men has dropped to a historical low, upsetting the balance of sexual marketplace in the process. Only the top 5-10% of men with the warrior traits and wealth are able to enjoy a semblance of a balanced relationship with women—and even they have to play the game.

6. The decimation of Western women

Declining marriage rates? Don’t worry, some simps will try to put a ring on their fingers.

Many Western women have been corrupted by our toxic materialist society. They are fatter, uglier, more narcissistic, more entitled, hedonistic, superficial, less faithful, and seem to think that having bitch attitude makes them hip. Women can afford to stoop low because their sex drive isn’t the same as men’s, while they couldn’t care less for love and companionship when they’re too busy with their travels and careers.

And because of all the thirsty men, women’s collective sexual market value hardly suffers while the value of those who are merely average becomes inflated beyond their real value. You only need to check out the gross discrepancies between the sexes in dating sites and apps to see how bad things are.

7. Anti-male culture

Men are all rapists waiting to be hatched out of their facade, men merely uttering a word to a woman is a harassment, men are always “mansplaining” to women, men are insecure cry-babies, men open their legs too much when they sit, men and their toxic masculinity need to be controlled, men have to do more for women, men are dominating in tech fields because of sexism, men shouldn’t say this, men shouldn’t do that, etc, etc… And of course, if men push back, they’re “misogynists.”

And we’re we still wondering why relationships are getting harder to form these days?

8. Lack of shared values

As social beings, we humans need more than economic incentives and passions to form a relationship for a family to prosper. There must be shared values.

With traditional family values under constant attack from all directions, the bonding between males and females have been reduced to mere hook-ups and economic unions. To make matters worse, many from both sides are resorting to predatory behaviors to exploit one another for either money (for women) or sex (for men), augmenting the distrust between the two sexes. Others, who either don’t want to play games or have become overtly hostile to the opposite sex, have given up on relationships entirely. This is the end result of atomization and extreme individualism under a system that destroys all values for the sake of economic advancement.


The destruction of sex relationship is having a negative effect on society as a whole and is transforming the demographic landscape of many Western nations. Unlike what the aesthetically-challenged feminists and the man-children crying their own way believe, men and women are not adversaries. You don’t have to be a traditionalist to see that the sex relations have gone awry due to the development of modern society and its destructive cultures.

Many Western men have already checked out or gone out to find traditional women elsewhere. But that is merely adapting to the situation; it doesn’t solve the problem at a societal level. The continuing antagonism of the sexes will eventually spread around the world. Unless the current course is somehow reversed, we can only wait and see how far the damage will run its course.

Corey Savage , Return of Kings 9 Comments [8/23/2018 2:09:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139991

[LifeFuel]JFL: Void sleepwalks off of a balcony after meeting up with 5 random chads to be gang sexed
final moments of British holidaymaker Kirsty Maxwell, 27, show her return from hen do then lie in bed... two hours before she fell to her death from Benidorm hotel balcony

• CCTV footage has captured the final moments of British woman Kirsty Maxwell
• She is filmed staggering along a corridor in the Payma Apartments in Benidorm
• The newly released footage was taken hours before she plunged to her death
• The chilling video has been aired on a BBC documentary called Killed Abroad

The real suicidefuel is that her husband is like a 6-7/10 and basically her inbred Anglo-gene looksmatch. And she was getting gangbanged to death and now her betabux husband has to stand up for her after her death. JFL at this existence. This is what ascension looks like boys.

please tell me theres footage somewhere of this cavernous roastie splattering on the pavement :feelskek:

Submitter's note: According to the article, the five men from whose balcony the woman fell do not seem to have interacted with her much. No mention of gangbangs. Yes, they are making juicy scandalous embellishments to the bloody Daily Mail!

Various incels, incels.me 3 Comments [8/22/2018 9:47:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139982

Polygamist upset with govt move to raise minimum marriage age

KOTA BARU: A 41-year-old rubber trader, who caused widespread outcry for marrying a Thai girl 30 years his junior, has expressed regret over the government’s plan to set the minimum marriage age for women to 18.

“My marriage has affected everyone and prompted the government to increase the minimum marriage (for women). I feel really bad,” he told the New Straits Times Press when contacted today.

Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail last month said the government would amend the Child Act 2016 and the Islamic Family Enactment to raise the minimum marriage age for women from 16 to 18.

This came after the couple’s marriage was exposed on June 18 when his second wife took to Facebook and posted about the couple’s solemnisation at a mosque in Thailand’s Muslim-majority south in Narathiwat province.

This has sparked an outrage among Malaysians, with many calling for action to be taken against the man and that the minimum legal marriage age to be increased in an effort to curb child marriages.

According to the Islamic Family Law Enactment, the minimum legal age for marriage is 18 for male and 16 for female.

The man was fined RM1,800 by Gua Musang Lower Syariah Court today for marrying without approval and also getting into a polygamous marriage without consent.

The child bride returned to Thailand earlier this month after “immense pressure from Malaysian media”, a senior Thai official was quoted as saying on Aug 11.

The 11-year-old, who is undergoing mental health counselling because of the intense level of attention, is believed to be the trader’s third wife.

“It has been almost two weeks since I saw her face and all I can do is look at our wedding picture whenever I miss my third wife,” the trader told NSTP.

He said his longing for his young wife, known only as Ayu, intensified today as neighbours celebrated Aidiladha with their loved ones.

“I spoke with her over the phone but I still miss her very much. All I have left are our pictures together, which I keep with me all the time,” he said.

The trader said the girl, who is currently under the care of the local social welfare department, was happy and in good health.

“My wife told me not to worry about her safety because her parents are staying close to her.

“I was also informed that her parents will bring her back to their hometown in Narathiwat today,” he said, adding that he has no plans to look for his young wife anytime soon.

Meanwhile, the controversial marriage has prompted the Narathiwat Islamic Religious Council (MAIN) to tighten regulations on marriages involving Malaysians, especially those in polygamous relationships.

“After this, couples must provide to the kadi (judge) a letter from their respective religious authorities allowing a person to marry a polygamist before the (marriage) ceremony can be held.

“This is to ensure that problems do not arise after the marriage,” the source said.

Anonymous, New Straits Times 4 Comments [8/22/2018 9:42:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139980

IT cuck father of a hole doesn't understand the bigger picture

This cuck of a father fails to realize what's in front of his face. Incels are barely a danger to his precious hole. In fact she will be the aggressor. She will demonize us because of our gender and our looks. She may end up fat and condemn anyone who dares not date her because of fat but will only go for a man 6'0" and up. Either way, she will end up a stuck up cum dumpster. She will be a hole passed around by numerous men during school, college, thereafter up until she settles for a betabuxx.

He should be worried about his daughter's inevitable actions in the future, not the assumed actions of people she will avoid anyway. He should be concerned that by the time her 20th birthday comes around, she will have likely swallowed pints of semen and will have lost her pair bonding abilities due to promiscuity. She will have manipulated and actively sought to ruin the lives of people she doesn't even know purely based on the way they look. Something that isn't acceptable anywhere else in society unless its directed towards an ugly short male. He fails to see that women aren't condemned because of their gender, modern femenism and SJW faggotry has made women celebrated and therefore can do no wrong. Don't forget, as far as society is concerned, men being raped/murdered is funny and just something that happens. Women being raped/murdered makes people lose their shit.

FrailPaleStaleMale, incels.me 5 Comments [8/22/2018 9:41:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139978

Do you want to pounce on girls in public?

If I'm out and see an even halfway attractive girl my impulse is to grab her, tear her clothes off, feel her up, and slobber all over her fun bits.

It's a very real, very concrete urge. I have no interest in talking to girls, hanging out with them, or anything; all I want to do is tackle them on sight, then touch and taste their flesh.

So, are all guys like this?

The End, incels.me 8 Comments [8/22/2018 9:40:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139977

Normies say Tinder is not real life. I think otherwise.

Normies always say that "Tinder is not real life". I have one thing to say. If I left swipe a girl on Tinder then that means she is so ugly that I do not even want to date/fuck her. Otherwise I would definitely swipe right. Swiping left is equivalent to rejecting a girl who might have been interested in meeting me. But I dislike her so much that I don't care about that. And I am sure no one on this forum will left swipe a girl who they want to date in the future. Would you? However, foids only swipe the best looking males right as we all know. What about the other ones? They don't give a fuck about them. They don't care if those guys have a good personality or shower 10 times a day.

But what happens in real life? Do all foids get the chads/chadlites they were swiping right earlier? Somebody who was not worth your time earlier is now your bf/betabuxx or whatever. How can they agree to spend time with someone that they were so repulsed by earlier that they didn't even give them a chance(swiped left)? When I go to the bars and gogos in Thailand, there are many girls inside. There are some I would not want to take to my hotel. Why? Coz I don't find them attractive. And I am pretty sure I would not date those women irl too. Any girl that I would date is definitely attractive enough in my book that I won't rule her out. Ruling someone out is an extreme thing. That means they are so undesirable that I don't want anything to do with them.

Let us say you go to a candy shop. To decide which candy you want to buy you chose to try them first. (Since candies are things to eat you can't just look at them and pick). You find that some candies taste awful. You don't want to buy them. You take the ones you like and then you leave. Tomorrow let us say you go back to the same shop to buy more candies. But this time only the candies that you earlier rejected for tasting bad are available, rest are out of stock. What will you do? Will you buy those candies? If you buy those candies then you are just forced to do so. And you will always despise the taste. And you will wish that you get the tasty candies.

This is what applies to women too. They might chose to settle with betabuxes and ugly men for status/money or just coz they can't find anyone else. But these men are like the candies with bad taste they rejected earlier. But then normies might say that most foids are only looking for hookups etc and not serious dates or long term partners on Tinder. Well that just proves that Alpha fuxx and Beta buxx is true. In any case, normies are wrong. Tinder shows your true worth as a partner. If you are not getting matches on Tinder then that indeed means that you are undesirable and any relationship you get will be betabuxxing.

11Gaijin, incels.me 1 Comments [8/22/2018 9:40:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139954

The government punishes married couples in dozens of ways financially for getting married (including at tax-time, those receiving disability benefits, if your spouse receives state care, et cetera). In every state, by law, the government is a legal 3rd party entity in all licensed marriages. Yes, you are also married to the state!

In addition, the feminist LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered) courts these days unfairly crucify men in divorce court. Lesbian judges are common now. Women don't think reasonably when they do men's jobs, because they were created by God to be emotional, submissive and sweet. So instead women become cruel and unjust in men's roles. Men on the other hand were created by God to be decisive, logical and to dominate. Feminism errantly teaches women to recognize a man's natural desire to dominate as being “abusive.” If you have a controlling father or husband, you ought to thank God that he is being the man God created him to be. There's no dog any more territorial than a man.

A man by nature wants to know who, what, where, when, how and why. That's his God-given right over his own wife, children and property. Why do you think Karl Marx (real Jewish name, Mordecai Levi) said that he could sum up Communism with one statement: Abolition of private property! Do you know why? It's because if you don't own any land, then you have no rights over that land or what happens on that land. Land ownership equals rights. Every real man wants to own his own land and be the boss of his property. The divorce rate has skyrocketed in America because of women's rights, because God-ordained masculine authority is viewed by feminists as oppressive. Yet, feminist hypocrites portray women on TV as being authoritative over men, and women who are able to physically over-powering men. It's not reality.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [8/21/2018 12:19:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139952

Re: Finally let myself be completely naked in the women's locker room, and it was so incredibly liberating. • r/asktransgender

How on earth does no one see a problem with this? This guy is bragging about (1) hanging out in a women's locker room where women typically are naked and (2) upping the ante and subjecting said women to his dick.

And then all the comments are about how brave and badass he is, to force his dick on a bunch of naked women.

He says it's liberating to force his dick on women.

I'm hitting peak trans right now.

Two spot on comments from a trans identified person that were deleted:

I think it makes us look odd too because the association with trans women is that we do not like how we were born and when someone openly flaunts in a setting around a bunch of naked women it raises...questions.

Yeah disregard other peoples trauma just so you can feel validated! How great!

Yeah, that person is pretty astute. Whenever anyone brings up the question of self ID trans women exposing themselves the answer always is, we hate out dicks and don't want to look at them either!

I had a peak at his profile. He has also posted a full frontal nude recently on a sub for nudes (he was the only one I saw that wasn't anonymous/ face obscured). He's definitely a exhibitionist and likely getting off on showing people his dick.

Beyond the many, many selfies in skimpy attire (and heavy makeup, at weird angles he apparently considers flattering), what sticks out to me is the number of pre-transition selfies he has and shares. This is a person who is and always has been utterly obsessed with looking at himself. I am completely unsurprised that someone like this has escalated to forcing women to look at him naked. I am also unsurprised that the response from most of that sub is a mix of jealousy and admiration. Male socialization, 'i want people to 'admire' me, no matter how involuntary, behold my greatness (and you'd better fucking call it great)' is textbook.

This is why it correlates so heavily with narcissism. Narcissism will always be more prevalent in men than in women.

That is definitely the vibe I got -- he felt "liberated" ie, loved parading himself around in view of all these women -- like, it seemed like some kind of weird fantasy he had, to impose himself that way.

You can't do stuff like that at the office or the grocery store (unless you want to risk arrest). You need access to women's spaces, and to call yourself a "woman." Sickening.

Lol real women, no matter how great their bodies are, hate being naked in front of other women. No one struts around naked in the showers.

They're all fetishists.

They are doing this shit because it gets them off, and they are bullying society into accepting their inappropriate sexual behavior and fetish.

Some of them probably extra get off on making women physically uncomfortable too, and of course having the excuse of "but no I am woman too" let's them rationalize their abusive behavior.

The deleted comments from “transphobes” are actually from trans people who think this is not cool.

I feel bad for them, almost as much as I do for the targets of his exhibitionism. Violating women’s consent is part of how he gets his jollies, obviously, and he also doesn’t care about throwing other trans people under the bus as long as he gets attention. I think he is hoping it will blow up into a big controversy with him at the centre of it. What a vile, pathetic person.

That guy in your link that says he's making it harder for the rest of them to access our spaces. He's not wrong. But at least he's trying to police the penis-wagging.

That's exactly why I want to see this happen all over, ASAP.

We can talk until we're blue in the face about how this will effect us, but all that talk is doing nothing. We need women to see this firsthand. We need the public to be visibly educated on the realities of the situation.

They need to see the truth, that MtT want to keep their penises and want to shove their penises down our throats literally and figuratively.

various TERFs, r/GenderCritical 4 Comments [8/21/2018 12:17:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 139947

How To Stop Incels From Killing People

The busy bees at the media have been highlighting how “dangerous” incels are, often linking them to the manosphere [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. These journalists fail to mention that incels have either outright rejected manosphere ideas, especially when concerning game, or have been inoculated against its teachings by their own media colleagues.

Incels are killing solely because they are failing to bond romantically or sexually with women in an intensely competitive sexual market that constantly rubs sex and nudity in their faces. The solution is rather simple: give them free sex from whores.

What is an incel?

It’s first helpful to determine the basic profile of an incel. Typically, he does not have a hands-on masculine father teaching him the ways of life and women. He was teased in school, though not aggressively bullied, and has few friends. He is not good in sports or any other activity that would help give him a sexy aesthetic. He has no skills beyond programming or playing video games. His educational upbringing taught him that any display of masculine behavior is harmful to females, which he has internalized to his own detriment. More severely, he is introverted and has practically no ability to talk to females or attract them.

A decade ago, this type of “herbivore” male become a cultural phenomenon in Japan. In America, it’s now becoming the default man. Within a few years, more than 50% of all men will be on the incel spectrum.

An incel primarily wants a loving relationship with an attractive woman. Secondly, he wants sex with any woman. A male who gets laid but doesn’t experience love may be depressed or unhappy, but he’s unlikely to possess the urge to kill. The ones who do end up killing have received neither relationships nor sex. They feel utterly forsaken by society. To remind society that they do in fact exist, they resort to getting attention in the only way they know how: killing. Shooting up people is the same for an incel as a female uploading a perfect selfie. It’s a way of saying please recognize my existence and validate me for it.

Incels must be provided free prostitutes

I therefore advocate for a government program called Complimentary Heterosexual Affections Directive (CHAD). Incels will be given a mobile QR code for a complimentary legalized sex session every six months, a time interval that would outright eliminate their urge to kill. The whores that are a part of this program would be given special training to make the incels feel special by calling them “handsome,” “powerful,” and “confident,” compliments they have never heard in their lives. The whores would rock their worlds to such an extent that the incels will patiently wait to live in freedom another six months to fornicate again.

The details of the CHAD program would be simple. First, the government would provide an online questionnaire that incels take to qualify for the program. It would not be too strict: if a man hasn’t been laid in at least six months and wants a free whore, it’s better for society to provide it for him to dampen his rising urge to be noticed through a mass shooting.

Whores would apply to the program and work from home or in a designated government brothel that is placed in high population areas. After a sexual experience, the incel would give his government whore a rating on a 1-5 star system. Whores who ever dip under 3 stars would be eliminated from the program, ensuring that the government only hires the best whores for the incels since this is literally a life or death matter.

Single women will pay for the incel’s whores

She’s funding the free whores program

Structuring CHAD as a government program will allow women to have “skin in the game”—they’ll be reminded that their choices in sex partners have both financial and mortal consequences. The program will be entirely funded through taxes on the products that enable women to have casual sex with attractive men—birth control, dating apps, and smartphones.

After CHAD is implemented, anyone who wants to buy an iPhone will have to provide government identification that reveals their sex. If the buyer is female and unmarried, an automatic 100% tax will be added. Women will also be taxed $5 for every Tinder match they receive, and each birth control pill purchased by an unmarried woman will come with an extra $1 tax that goes directly to fund CHAD.

Whenever a girl uses her phone to get attention from attractive men, scores a new Tinder match with a hot guy, or pops a birth control pill that let’s her have sex without wanting to reproduce, her mind will flash with the realization that her easy-earned money is going towards incels she refuses to bang. If women are choosing nice guy incels for sex, those incels will not need to use the whore program and thus the tax will be reduced. It’s fine if women want to forsake the bottom 50% of the male population for sexual relationships, but they will have to pay for it so those men don’t kill other citizens. We have to stop the high standards of modern women from causing additional deaths.

An easier and cheaper solution than the CHAD program is to teach men game, particularly the Roosh Program. It instructs an incel to hit the gym, read some books, build up social experience, stop being a wimp, and finally embrace the masculinity that has been smothered for so long. Game may be getting harder in the West, but there are still worthwhile options in South America, Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia.

Game saves lives

This man will not kill anyone

The fact that Jewish organizations, feminist authors, and the media continue to attack me means that they don’t really care that people are getting shot up. Give me an incel on the verge of killing and I’ll hand you back a sexually sated Stan who lives in Thailand for three months of the year, or a beefed-up Oscar who found a dive bar where he can bang porkers on the weekends with barely any effort. Maybe these situation aren’t exactly ideal for Stan or Oscar, but it’s better than rotting in jail or being killed by the police in an exciting shootout that gets millions of views on YouTube.

Of course our cultural elites with not help implement the CHAD or Roosh program. As much as they whine about how older women can’t find any “good men,” and how hard it is for mentally ill trannys to get laid with in a climate of “transphobic” discrimination, they much prefer for incels to fuck off and die. A Silicon Valley executive named Ellen Pao even suggested they never be hired in the first place, which could lead to their starvation. We’re only a year or two off from op-eds in the New York Times suggesting Incel Concentration Camps. Are you a man who women don’t want to sleep with? Off to the gulags! You won’t even be allowed to masturbate.

The reaction of the elites clearly shows that there will be many more incel shooting sprees in the future. They will desperately try to link these killings to pro-masculine dissidents such as myself, but we know that if a man is allowed to find my work and implement it, he would never want to kill in the first place. Let us all hear the incel rallying cry: Give me love, give me whores, or give me game! Otherwise, he just may go crazy.

Roosh V, Roosh V 13 Comments [8/21/2018 5:20:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139929

[Soy] /r/short's mod tags a literal cuckold post with the "Awesome!" flair.

HomoheroBishii, incels.me 7 Comments [8/20/2018 8:59:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139924

[b][Blackpill] [Sciencepill] [Evolutionpill] Why women prefer Chad[/b]

It's very simple.

Men are designed to impregnate as many females as possible. We are all men here and if we had the chance we would fuck every hot woman walking past us in the streets. We would breed them all. It is evident as we are designed ready to spread our seed every 5-10 minutes or so, and some men have no refractory period at all. In the past the strong Chad could easily overpower women and rape them, but that wasn't necessary as the women naturally flocked to him. But when it was necessary to rape a female from another tribe he could easily do so and the woman would be stuck with his child.

But women have to spend 9 months pregnant. Women in the past (default state of humanity) didn't have access to maternity and childbirth assistance. They would more often than not die, as they were a big fat slow-moving target, or simply died during childbirth. Thus they wanted to make sure to at least carry Chad's seed to term, even if she dies her genes live on in Chad's son. She obviously did not want to carry an incel's seed to childbirth to then die and have an incel born.

Just like in our other ape cousins (we humans are apes as well) as well as other species, the Chad alpha males control harems and gets exclusive rights to breed with all females, keeping the incel virgin beta males from breeding. Likewise did our ancient human ancestors do. The Chad alpha male(s) would have privileged breeding and sex rights, meanwhile the beta males would be lucky to get pity sex if anything.

Women (and men) are still like this today. Because even if we are living in concrete jungles, you can't go against nature, buddy boyo.

diogenes, incels.me 7 Comments [8/20/2018 2:28:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139907

Could deepfakes be a partial solution in the future

As we know, foids are obsessed with showing off. You can find their photos anywhere so obtaining the material wouldn't be hard. This deepfakes thing that made the news ages ago could be a potential solution to combat women and their degenerate activities. Not only would it diminish their individual value after you create any custom material using their image, but it could also be used to blackmail or embarrass them. An absolute bonus is that foids would never in their life want us to have real visual material of them getting fucked, they hate knowing we think about them during fap time as it is. Considering you'd have hundreds of thousands of bodies to choose from, it not being their body wouldn't matter so much.

If I had a computer good enough, i'd probably look more into it and would probably use it to intimidate, blackmail or embarrass some roasties whenever possible. It would be good to mix it up, instead of using something like a knife or a machete to threaten these whores, I could just use CGI shit every now and then to humiliate and degrade them even more than they already do so themselves.

FrailPaleStaleMale, incels.me 7 Comments [8/18/2018 2:59:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Evil Has A Bad Sense Of Humour Award

Quote# 139896

Heroic Bitch Who Pushed Other Bitch Off a Bridge Said That Shit was Lolz as Fuck

You know, I can really respect this mindset.

Pushing some bitch off a bridge is fucking hilarious.

Why is it illegal?

If we’re going to legalize marijuana, surely we can legalize pushing sluts off of bridges.

Fox News:

An 18-year-old woman said she “didn’t think about the consequences” before pushing her 16-year-old friend off a bridge that was 60 feet high — equivalent to six stories — in Washington state last week.

Her friend, Jordan Holgerson, suffered several broken ribs and an injured esophagus and trachea after falling into the river.

“I thought she would be fine,” the teen, Taylor Smith, told ABC News’ “Good Morning America” on Friday. Smith has been charged with reckless endangerment, according to ABC News, a charge that is punishable by up to a year in jail and up to $5,000 in fines.

Earlier this month, a video that showed Holgerson being pushed off a bridge at the Lewis River at Moulton Falls Regional Park in Vancouver went viral on social media before it was removed.

That shit was ultimo lolz.

Gotta admit.

I hate women and don’t think they’re funny, but that was truly hilarious.

Pushing stupid bitches off of bridges is like, a classic joke. Like a fart joke or a joke about someone’s dick.

It is eternal.

It will always be hilarious to push some bitch off a bridge.

If there is one thing we need more of, it is more stupid skanks getting pushed off bridges.

Andrew Anglin, Daily Stormer 20 Comments [8/18/2018 1:13:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 139892

Monogamy as a sub-5 male is just prostitution with extra steps

I have spoken against the incel community's passion for monogamous societies in the past, but I will continue on my crusade against "polygamy caused inceldom".

A lot of incels want to return to a time where women were not allowed to work, and where they had to marry a man just to survive. But what they don't realize is that this doesn't end inceldom. Just because a women would rather marry you than starve to death in the streets, doesn't mean you are somehow "not incel".

In my opinion, inceldom is about the unability to have a female desire to be in a sexual relationship with you, and just because they don't want to be homeless, doesn't mean they want you.

Women will forever lust after Chad, women will forever fantasize about being gangbanged, women will forever hate you and your ugly face, women will forever, atleast in their mind, mock your short stature. No amount of taking away women's rights will change this.

This is one of the brutalest blackpill, that no matter whether we live in some feminist lib-left 24/7 pride parade or some Nazi empire, this will never change. Biology trumps all.

fellofix, incels.me 4 Comments [8/18/2018 8:37:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139890

there is no demand for men at all

lets look at the dating market from an economical standpoint.
you have a chain of supply (lets say men) and consumers which are woman.
now according to the blackpill chads get 80% of all sex. which is debatable.
well if that was true, you wouldn't have incel chads. (a rare phenomena but can still happen from time to time).
iv seen incels who are 1-8 on the looks scale. i mean, the variation of this can occur at almost every level of looks if we measure it on a scale
check websites like pof,match,tinder,loveme etc. the guys who post there are not all losers. alot of them have great jobs, good cars and decent looks.
but still, they would be lucky to get a reply back from a female. why? because there is no demand.

all of the blackpill theory stands on the basis woman are equally interested in relationships as men are. which is a claim that needs to be re-examined

jet112, incels.me 4 Comments [8/18/2018 8:37:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139878

Ofc. If you are ugly you are creep regardless what you do. You cross eyesight, omfg you are a creep staring at them. Need consent to say hi!

If you are good looking you can "rape" them anytime! That's modern feminism logic 101. Heck they might even found out they are into rape and S&M, I mean 50 Shades of Gray was popular for a reason...

ForLoveOfMe, MMO Champion 7 Comments [8/17/2018 12:33:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139871


Roastie is a word for insufferable women that makes fun of something women can't change without extremely invasive surgery: their labia. Implying their labia looks like roast beef. This is in response to women who height shame men as men cannot change their height. The difference is that men generally don't give any actual fucks about women's labias and it's just a joke feminists claim to be upset about. While women give enormous fucks about the height of men, usually refusing to date any men shorter than them. Again, height being something men can't change without even more invasive surgery than a labiaplasty.

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 9 Comments [8/17/2018 12:06:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139875

Men brought and are bringing us progress

Such a Spiegel (a German magazine) can be a rewarding source. Not only the article from Sundayevening is based on a Spiegel article. The article “The Gearloose Dilemma” sounds like the title of a “Big Bang Theory” episode and indeed, it is about technology, or rather about the ones who brought us technological progress: Men!

[Long list of inventions by year]

I am really astounded that no one at Der Spiegel noticed that there is not a single woman on the list. Oh, where are they, the female spearheads in technology, science and research? Who brought our society to where we are now? Men have at all turned towards problems to solve them and to bring society forward. Where are the female Zuckerbergs (Facebook), the female Larry Ellisons (Oracle Databases), the female Bill Gates (Microsoft), the female Jeff Bezos (Amazon)?

And before some Informatics-SJW screams “Ada Lovelace” (1815-1852, daughter of Lord Byron, co-worker of Charles Babbage and known as the first programmer): Compared to Alan Turing or Konrad Zuse, she is a rather small light.

Her great “accomplishment” was to write a computer program for the calculation of Bernoulli-numbers for a machine by Charles Babbage that was never built.

Alan Turing, on the other hand, developed the most important model of computing in theoretical mathematics in the form of the “Turing Machine”. A Turing machine models the workings of a Computer in a particularly easy and mathematically well-analysable way.

Conrad Zuse build over 200 computers throughout his life, among them, during World War 2, the famous Z3, the world’s first programmable computer

But at least, a computing language was named after Ada Lovelace which was supported by the American military and which today probably no one uses anymore outside of weapon systems and in critical high-security environments. (In contrast to C/C++, which was already developed by Bjarne Stroustrun in 1979 and is one of the most important programming languages even today.)

@Original German:
Männer brachten und bringen uns den Fortschritt

So ein Spiegel kann eine dankbare Quelle sein. Nicht nur der Artikel vom Sonntag Abend basiert auf einem Spiegelartikel. Der Artikel „Das Düsentrieb-Dilemma“ ist auch eine dankbare Basis für einen kleinen Blogeintrag. „Das Düsentrieb-Dilemma“ klingt wie der Titel einer Folge „Big Bang Theory“ und tatsächlich geht es um Technik, beziehungsweise darum, wer uns den technischen Fortschritt gebracht hat: Männer!

Ich wundere mich wirklich, dass dem Spiegel gar nicht aufgefallen ist, dass keine einzige Frau in der Liste ist. Wo sind sie nur, die weiblichen Speerspitzen in Technik, Wissenschaft und Forschung? Wer hat unsere Gesellschaft dahin gebracht wo sie heute ist? Männer haben sich zu allen Zeiten Problemen zugewandt um diese zu lösen und die Gesellschaft voranzubringen. Wo sind die weiblichen Zuckerbergs (Facebook), die weiblichen Larry Ellisons (Oracle Datenbanken), die weiblichen Bill Gates (Microsoft), die weiblichen Jeff Bezos (Amazon)?

Und bevor jetzt irgendeine Informatik-Emanze „Ada Lovelace“ schreit (1815–1852, Tochter von Lord Byron, Mitarbeiterin von Charles Babbage und als erste Programmiererin bekannt): Im Vergleich zu Alan Turing oder Konrad Zuse war sie doch eher ein kleines Licht.

Ihre „große“ Leistung war, dass sie lange vor dem ersten Computer ein Computerprogramm zur Berechnung von Bernoulli-Zahlen für eine nie gebaute Maschine von Charles Babbage geschrieben hat.

Alan Turing dagegen hat mit der „Turing Machine“ das wichtigste Rechnermodell der theoretischen Informatik entwickelt. Eine Turingmaschine modelliert die Arbeitsweise eines Computers auf besonders einfache und mathematisch gut zu analysierende Weise.

Conrad Zuse hat in seinem Leben mehr als 200 Computer gebaut, darunter während des 2. Weltkrieges die berühmte Z3, den ersten programmierbaren Computer der Welt.

Aber immerhin hat man nach Ada Lovelace eine Programmiersprache benannt, die vom amerikanischen Militär gefördert wurde und die heute vermutlich jenseits von Waffensystemen und in hochsicherheitskritischen Umgebungen kaum noch einer nutzt. (Im Gegensatz zu C/C++, das von Bjarne Stroustrup schon 1979 entwickelt wurde und noch heute eine der wichtigsten Programmiersprachen ist.)

mgtow klartext, mgtow klartext 3 Comments [8/17/2018 11:15:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139872

Women's Rights Are Destroying America!

Feminism, the "right to commit adultery," is an abomination before God!

- Granting women legal rights precipitated a fifty fold increase in the US divorce rate.

- Implementing the "family law act of 1970" caused the divorce rate to jump almost 40% in just one year.

- 21 million Americans died as a direct result of this increased divorce rate, including one million divorce related suicides and one million divorce related homicides in the 20th Century alone.

- 8 million of these deaths were due solely to the 44% increase in the premature mortality rate of the children of divorce.

- Altogether, feminists cost 55,000,000 American Lives in the Twentieth Century.

- Our divorce rate is four times higher than countries like Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan--and Afghanistan!

- Feminism, the "right to commit adultery", is an abomination before God!

In the four minutes it will take you to read this page, eighteen more fellow Americans will be divorced, and nine will die as a direct result of that divorce, which means that giving American women legal rights was tantamount to mass genocide. The US Surgeon General reports that divorce is a bigger health risk to men than smoking tobacco. The Centers for Disease Control report that divorce triples the risk of suicide. Twelve different scholarly studies demonstrate that divorce significantly increases the premature mortality of fathers, mothers, and the children of divorce.

Divorce and illegitimacy put almost half of the nation's children in fatherless households where they are up to 73 times more likely to be fatally abused. One child of divorce dies prematurely for each 15 divorces in the US. The increased divorce rate in the US killed 21 million Americans in the 20th Century alone. Each additional one hundred divorces nationwide parallels five additional suicides, ten additional murders, twenty additional rapes, and three hundred more men in prison. The fifty fold increase in the US divorce rate paralleled a ten fold increase in the murder rate and a seventeen fold increase in the incarceration rate.

Divorce contributed to the increase in the percent of US managers and administrators who are women from 19% to 43%, which decreased the purchasing power of the average American family by two thirds. It caused a $7 trillion increase education spending at the same time that SAT Scores decreased 98 points, putting the US DEAD LAST in TIMSS. It contributed to the US having the industrial world's only negative Personal Savings rate, reducing the net worth of the average American household to a negative $77,000 each. It contributed to our record high personal and corporate bankruptcy filings.

Worldwide, each additional one hundred divorces parallels two additional suicides, one additional murder, six additional rapes, thirty three additional armed robberies, and puts one hundred more men in prison.

Feminism, the "right to commit adultery", the unwarranted demand for legal rights for women, the root cause of divorce, an abomination before God, must be outlawed and female criminals must be punished. Blind dumb feminists cannot point to one single economic or social statistic with pride and say "It was all worth it".

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 7 Comments [8/17/2018 11:14:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139870


Over a hundred years ago a bunch of rich women were upset that they could not move up in official positions of power in work or politics. So they got men to give them the vote and affirmative action for political office. Through legislation women made it even easier for themselves than men to climb traditionally male dominance hierarchies! Only problem is that they aren't sexually attracted to men who are lower in dominance hierarchies of status and money than they are. So as women gained dominance in traditional male hierarchies, they complained a bunch about there being 'no good men'[1] aka the dwindling amount of men wealthier or more powerful than them to give them tingles. As less men gave them tingles more incels were created and more men were sent their own way. And as women gained more dominance in society they complained more about beta males, and "rape" etc...
They even created campaigns against these increasing amount of men lower on the social hierarchy than them they are not sexually attracted to like the:

Anti Catcalling Movement: aka 'Men poorer than me better not hit on me in public'

Anti Manspreading Movement: aka 'Public transport users (people poorer than me, or people who have not yet proved they are higher status than me) should not make me think of their junk'

Metoo movement: aka 'Autistic and socially isolated ugly men who can't read social cues should be locked up or ridiculed as much as rapists'[2]

Female Contempt for an Obvious Outcome of Feminism: Househusbands

A matriarchal world where women make more money than men would seem to necessitate an increase in house-husbands. The male liberation movement, a subset of feminist MRAs in the 60s wanted a dramatic increase in househusbands. However even in the most feminist countries, women will still expect the man to work or else a breakup, even if she makes enough to provide for the family in an uber-welfare state. This is of course, insanely pointless. Early 20th century anti-feminist and Marxist Belfort Bax' quote still remains true, "Among all the women’s rights advocates I am not aware of one who, in her zeal for equality between the sexes, has ever suggested abolishing the right of maintenance of the wife by the husband."[3]

Even in a country where feminism is intitutional and mainstream, where equal-pay laws are in place, and where women have more total personal wealth than men, "the key factor in the decision to divorce is whether Hubby has a job. If he doesn’t, even if his job loss is involuntary, his odds of being ditched by his wife skyrocket"[4]

As Eggman puts it, "Talk to any US woman and they'll tell you about men offering and actually buying them all sorts of things, when was the last time a woman offered to buy you a house or car, now that we have gender equality and all?"[5]

A 100% Completed Feminist World Be Better for Incels Than Partial Feminism... Theory

So far we see that feminism literally creates incels, but there may be a silver lining in a 100% feminist universe compared to a partial feminist universe, in that feminists feminize societies to the point where all men are so beta that it's not hard to become a chad or to get a woman to agree to be asked out. Since no men ask women out in the 100% feminist universe once men are so beta.

The Eradication of Feminism is Best for Incels... Theory

Because feminism has created more incels, many if not most self-identified incels are trad-con, patriarchal, and don't subscribe to the previous theory and think matriarchies won't be sexually generous. They should argue for a generous patriarchy with strictly socially enforced monogamy as not all patriarchies are alike. In most if not all modern patriachal countries, polygyny arises and men hoard women, causing inceldom as well. And in patriarchal muslim countries, the hoarding of women in harems, inflates the bride-price so high that there exists a vast underclass of singe men who are susceptible to the promise of either real life brides or virgin brides in the afterlife through terrorist organization like al-Qaeda or ISIS. It is for this reason that people joke about incels and muslims terrorists on incel boards. Some incels also believe that the only kind of pro-natalism that can be achieved to wipe out inceldom would be through a racial supremacist movement, which partly explains why people like Richard Spencer pander to incels.

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 3 Comments [8/17/2018 11:13:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139869


Shaming things men can't change is a popular femoid hobby

Femoids, short for female humanoid organisms, are flakey creatures who have bullied or ignored you your entire life. That is unless they were somehow making money off you as a teacher or counselor or barber or wife etc... It is rumored they are capable of friendship, but most women also dispute this. One popular femoid hobby is feminism, the process by which they lie to men that their ever increasing sexual freedom will trickle down below sub 8 PSL rated males.


Women tend to react as negatively to women as men do to women in dating. This is seen with lesbians on social anxiety boards and FTM transsexuals that try to date women. Dykes find out how hard it is to get past a woman's hind-brained paranoia about strangers and new people, and end up bitterly single.

The value of femoids

Femoids are very good at lying very often and not feeling bad about it. This makes them very good at child-rearing and being a lawyer but a bit more than misleading during dating or while giving dating advice. The easiest and most heroic act of compassion and generosity for women would be to put effort into relationships with incels. However it is unknown whether or not incel groupies actually exist or can exist due to a lack of natural sexual generosity among the female species. Femoids are also very good at extracting personal wealth from men when given the freedom to. Femoids now own more total personal wealth than men in the United States.

Origin of the term

Women were upset that autists were being autists (not new) and complained incels were using the scientific term 'female' instead of 'woman' in incel forums. In response to the complaint being dumb, as you can't always substitute 'woman' for 'female', many incels stopped using the word 'female' and chose a more dehumanizing term, 'femoid', to make fun of women hating the word 'female' and to make fun of their own autism.

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 4 Comments [8/17/2018 11:13:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139868

Pussy cartel

The pussy cartel refers to women's artifically inflating the value of sex via price-fixing.

Sex is worth maybe $5 of women's time and effort. But women know men will go insane without sex, so they collectively deny it to men. They force (non-attractive) men to invest hundreds if not thousands of dollars in time, gifts, dinners, just for the possibility that they will get sex.

Effects of prostitution on sex prices

• Men would be less easily manipulated by sex. If men could simply pay for sex instead of having to win a girl's affection, then the average woman would have much less sexual control over the average man.
• The value of sex would go down. Men are less severely incel in societies where prostitutes are legal, so prostitutes charge less. Low quality escorts cost hundreds of dollars in countries like the US where prostitution is illegal. This is outrageous price for something that costs the woman nothing and requires no skill. In countries where Germany where prostitution is legal, prices are much lower. "Bulgarian and Romanian women sometimes charge less than €10 [$13]," she says. "One woman here will even do it for a Big Mac."[1]

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 3 Comments [8/17/2018 11:13:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139867

(Redirected from Wife)

Redirect to:

-> Pussy cartel

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 0 Comments [8/17/2018 11:13:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139866

The reason why foids keep wanting to join sites like Incels.me

is not JUST so that they can get a bunch of gullible orbiters to serve as their loyal band of cucks, offering them resources, protection, validation, emotional support, etc. in vain hope of getting sexual favors in return. It's not JUST that they want to divide the community by instigating a clash between foolish white knights and men who want to rightfully put foids in their place and call them out on their bullshit.

It's also because they want to gain acceptance for the idea that their inability to get a commitment from Chad is as severe a problem as incels' inability to get any pussy AT ALL. They want to elevate their own petty grievances, at not being able to lock down a guy who's way out of their league, as being as extreme a torment as what incels receive. This will put them in a position where if incels actually start to attract any sympathy, they can divert that away from incels toward themselves, by saying, "I'm miserable too, but it's even worse for me, because I'm A GIRL, which makes me all the more sensitive and pitiable than men, who are strong and can suck up whatever life throws at them! Tee-hee!"

Foids know that in a community where both incels and foids are talking about their suffering, men will focus primarily on helping the foids ("women and children first," and all that) because it's so ingrained in male nature to help the damsel in distress, while leaving men to look after their own needs.

Foids also want to gain acceptance for the idea that if they've made bad choices in the past that have fucked up their own lives and that of their kids, they should be forgiven and allowed to socialize with the same kind of men whom they fucked over by making those very choices (to choose Chad over incels). They want to further humiliate incels by making them have to be around the same people who STILL, to this day, will not open their legs to them. In their view, if incels are gullible enough to fall for their claims of just wanting to show some solidarity and support (which is really just more empty platitudes; if females won't offer their holes, everything else just amounts to, "I'm sorry you have to go through that"), then they deserve what they get.

This is the whole reason for IncelTears's existence -- if foids can't attack the community from within, they'll gather some Reddit cucks together and attack it from the outside. They have managed to assemble a community of tens of thousands of men who are trying to virtue signal to impress them. These men have sunk to a new low, devoting their time and effort to pleasing these foids, at the expense of their fellow man, just for a pat on the back and some Reddit karma. If you're going to be a cuck, you should at least get SOME pussy now and then, when your wife's boyfriend is off fucking some other broad. For this reason, the Internet white knight is even more pathetic than the IRL white knight.

Lastly, foids want to trivialize male inceldom as being no worse than what they go through. They want to imply that being a being a 25-year-old KHHV is no worse than being a girl who has to settle for a sub-8 man who's willing to take care of her and give her an easy life just because she has a pussy. If they can trivialize male inceldom, then if incels call for any social changes to elevate their status to something higher than being a slave to serve the feminine imperative, foids will be in a position to shame them for being unreasonable and oppressive, because they've already established that foids are getting fucked over by male behavior equally as much as incels are getting fucked over by feminism.

In reality, everyone is suffering under the current state of affairs, but it's not in foids' nature to be able to work with men to try to change society for the better. They're always going to want to try to manipulate the situation for their own advantage, because that's what foids do. Relations between the sexes are always sexual; there's no avoiding that. When foids are around, men are going to get distracted by trying to strategize how they can put their dick in a foid, and foids are going to divide up whatever men are around into Chads and non-Chads, open their legs to the Chads, and manipulate the non-Chads into serving as their cuck orbiters.

Any non-Chad who doesn't cooperate with the feminine imperative, and instead tries to put a stop to her manipulative behavior, she will try to exile from the community, so that she can eliminate an adversary who might otherwise get in the way of her selfish agenda. This is why so many females want to become moderators. Even if they seem at first like they might be okay, it's never going to end well, because foids always abuse whatever power they're given over men, much more than men do when given power over foids.

Nathan "Leucosticte" Larson, incels.me 4 Comments [8/17/2018 11:13:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
1 2 3 4 5 6 | top