1 5 6 7 | bottom
Quote# 125954

Females don't have personalities

I know one femoid organism who has diagnosed autism and had literally no interests outside playing insipid Xanga games. Talks in a monotone, long awkward pauses where her brain seems to be on idle, etc.

She got married 3 years ago and just shat out her first runt (male, so likely a future spergcel).

This makes me fucking furious. Normshits are always saying to improve your personality - what bullshit! A female have the personality of a vegetable and still get laid, get married, have kids, etc.

As a matter of fact, most FHOs have only the most basic pumpkin spice latte of personalities. No deep interests, no passions, no unique take on life, no strong ambitions other than the most generic normie shit (money/house/kids/travel). They can still get a boyfriend at the drop of a hat.

This includes the "nerdy" "gamer girl" "feminist activist" "kinky" "polyamorous" pussy equipped redditwhores who post here. They dont have any original instrinsic personality, they have a bunch of cliques they identify with. No real depth, substance, originality or thought put into it.

Females are garbage.

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 12 Comments [4/2/2017 7:30:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125952

Women have no ambition

Women's life goals:

(A) be Instagram famous

(B) have a Chad boyfriend to take photos with in Bali, Paris and Ibiza

(C) short internship or job that produces nothing of value (which she will also quit after 3 months after finding a sugar daddy and blaming it on being "burned out from work") in a comfortable air conditioned office in some company with a flashy name like EY partners (flashy like their handbag brands) so she can brag about her "Career" and wear sexy office clothes everyday (boss only hired her because she is hot)

yup, that is all!

Inceldemographic, /r/incels 17 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125951

For Incels: female "friends" cannot help you.

1) They cannot emphasise with our situation: They phenomena of being sexually repulsive to the opposite sex is completely unfathomable to them. Why do you think they constantly undermine our situation:

Being a virgin is not that bad, no one cares that you are.

Sex isn't all that.

Sex shouldn't be important to you, get yourself a hobby.

I think you have bigger problems than getting laid, a girlfriend won't save you.


If those retards had two brain cells to rub together then they'll know that undermining someone's problems is the WORST thing you should do in trying to "help" them.

2) They won't have sex with you or set you up with their friends either (and it's a known fact that every female knows at least one slut that's in-discriminatory with her choices). Deep down they see us as sexually-repulsive subhuman garbage.

3) As such they would be a constant reminder of someone you can never have. Like a piece of meat just out of reach from a caged lion. Someone so close but yet so far, someone you can never be with. This will destroy you mentally and spiritually.

4) They will ghost you: Whether this is real life or on reddit. It's no different from online dating after a few messages they disappear out of nowhere. Incels have already reported the females that offer support disappear (probably to fuck their new Chad). That feeling of abandonment will further crush you.

Ignore the normies on this board, their nothing but snake oil salesman that want to see us fail and blame and laugh at us when we do.

dontcryimalreadydead, /r/incels 4 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125950

Men who compliment women are a disgrace

They just empower these bitches so that they have even higher standards. Fuck these men. Women do not deserve validation from the opostie sex because they are bisexual cunts.

thegambler953, /r/incels 9 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125949

"Feminists want Islam because the Burkha eliminates competition from better looking women."

No. That is only a small part of it, and most Muslim countries do not mandate the burkha.

They just crave the treatment of women under Islam. They get gina tingles from it, so it is all driven by the female hindbrain.

Anon, Dalrock 2 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125948

What would your ideal sex slave be like

• 5' tall with a lolita build

• Intact hymen

• Cute face

• Watches anime and plays vidya while sitting on my lap (erection)

• Never had, or will have contact with men other than me

• Willing to do FFM threesomes with me, and will actively find chicks for us to fuck

• Enthusiastically submits to any sexual demands I make

• Squirts female ejaculate like a firehose

• Extremely devoted, loyal and self sacrificing and does all the domestic slave chores like cooking and cleaning

• Raises all our children with a minimum of input from me and never gets fat no matter how many times impregnated

• Cute innie pussy that smells/tastes of berries and cream, that has never been devastated by Chad or Tyrone

• Willing to raise our female descendants to be free sex faeries who will rescue the men of r/incels from their subhumanity

Why do females like this not exist IRL? Just lol at whoever devised this nightmarish universe.

EveryDayIsANightmare, /r/incels 21 Comments [4/2/2017 7:29:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125945

[On misogyny in the atheist community]

Since only feminists use that word, I'm gonna assume it was feminists saying it. So my thoughts drive me into assuming this is bullshit.

Every time women are under represented somewhere, by feminist reasoning it is always because of misogyny.

You see western women defending Islam customs in atheist sites, what do you expect? Comprehension?

Tiago Gomes, Facebook 5 Comments [4/2/2017 7:28:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125941

If I'm the one putting food on your table, giving you a bed to sleep in and a roof over your head, and being willing to sacrifice my life for your safety - figuratively speaking - you better believe you are going to follow my rules. That is not up for debate, at all, and not least because there's nothing you could do about it anyway. I don't need any further "moral basis" and you are not in a position to negotiate or make demands. If you consider that "enslavement", then find another country to live in.


The difference between you and me, I guess, is that I don't mind everything collapsing. You'd suffer far more than I would and you'd learn a valuable lesson. Liberal Western civilization has lost its way and run its course in any case, so we're overdue for a change in direction, and if necessary rebuilding. If the builders of civilization aren't being given their due respect and acknowledgment, then I'd rather see it destroyed. Threats of collapse mean absolutely nothing to me.

LeoSiles, NY Mag (comments) 7 Comments [4/2/2017 7:27:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: ScrappyB

Quote# 125933

Women shouldn't be allowed to vote or hold positions of power for one simple reason. Most women make decisions based on EMOTIONS instead of FACT.

As we are now seeing, a government heavily influenced by women will be overrun with bleeding heart social programs (expanding welfare state) even in the wake of much bigger problems (faltering economy).

The FACT is that we don't have the money for these social programs. However, since women have been allowed in to the political world, the EMOTIONAL response allowing these social programs has been HUGE!


unknow, Debate.org 10 Comments [4/2/2017 8:20:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: PETS(People Eating Tasty Sexists)

Quote# 125923

Men, not you slick, built the world while you and the cabal of tramps crying about us leaving you to fend for yourselves were blaming us for your own idiocy and poor choices. When it all crumbles that isn’t going to save you, and those tramps will be begging one of those useless vermin to save them with the only thing they have to offer, REAL newsflash kid it isn’t her personality because she doesn’t have one. Oh and all those ingrates from the third world won’t be much help either, suck it up buttercup and enjoy the pain and suffering you wanted.

We don’t want you, don’t need you, and could care less what you think!

Everything you see when you drive down the road, including the road, was built by men, not women. All of the world’s cities, neighborhoods and roads were built by man-ual labor, not fem-ual labor.

All of the rights and privileges today’s women hold over men’s heads in exchange for the those two circles and a triangle were bought and paid for through the trafficking, exploitation, usury and disposal of men.

What we built, we will tear down. Men are the key to women’s survival. You can mass murder all the babies you want. You’ll only be cutting off your nose to spite your entitled, narcissistic and callous face – in an effort to destroy those that gave you everything upon which you rely for female advancement over men. Ga head. Make my day. Gunslinger time.

MGTOW is why you sometimes bolt upright in bed at night following a mind shaking nightmare.

We’re here, we couldn’t care less what you think, we know all your mind games and can’t wait for your feeble rebuttal. Come at me. I dare you.

T0000009, We Hunted The Mammoth 10 Comments [4/2/2017 3:25:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Hu's On First

Quote# 125921

I am a woman (aged 30), and I have to agree that we (women) are too emotional and not rational or logical enough to have the right to vote. Most women are intelligent but we allow our emotions to take over and we don't often think straight. I have never voted because we should not have the right to vote. Men are often naturally more level headed, rational and logical and understand politics better that women do.

Julie83, Debate 17 Comments [4/2/2017 3:20:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: PETF

Quote# 125907

LOL I learned something the other day you might find interesting. In the original stories, Helen of Troy, “The most beautiful woman in all of Greece”, was only about 10 years old. I imagine she was supposed to look something like Miette from The City Of Lost Children.

Fronk, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 7 Comments [4/1/2017 11:37:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 125899

On the subject of Angry Harry, one of my favourite memories of his blog is when he wrote about the thrill he gets from seeing a long e-mail or comment left from a feminist hag and he just clicks delete even without reading the first sentence

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 9 Comments [4/1/2017 8:47:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: xavier

Quote# 125896

Multiple, means anything more than 1. Why don't you put the number of countries dominated by female entrepreneurs right next the number dominated by male entrepreneurs and you'll see how useless your point is. You'd be hard press to find a company like Apple, Shell, Fedex, Oracle etc that employes tens of thousands of people that was founded by women. That's simply the truth. And even if you did, for every one you could find there are thousand more founded by men.

"You're putting the entire responsibility for reproduction and families on women. You're reducing me to my uterus, basically, while men are allowed to be actual human beings. And next you're going to tell me that my sole worth is in my appearance and sexiness, because that's the only way I could attract a man."

Huh? A women that puts motherhood above career is not allowed to be a human? So being a corporate slave/workhorse while outsourcing parenting to a nanny is a more noble endeavor than being a mother? What can be more noble than raising a child?

"Women as passive baby receptacles isn't even actual evolution or reality in nature, just wishful thinking"

It isn't? Until men evolve a uterus, you'll just have to be wrong here.

"Our society moves faster than evolution, now. We survive and reproduce at an unsustainable rate because we're brilliant: we've figured out how to utilize all of the intelligence of our species, black or white, male or female, through movements towards social equality. Now we can take advantage of all of the inventions and progress that could have been made by anyone, without relegating them to slave's status."

None of this amounts to anything if a society can't even sustain its population. Germany is now down to 1.4 children per family. In a few hundred years, places like Germany and Sweden will be a Muslim countries because the native born gave up on having kids. The only way these liberal, feminist societies can sustain their numbers is by mass immigration from countries that DON'T have feminist values(i.e. women actually see family and motherhood as a communal duty). If a society can't sustain itself, something is broken.

"Women have changed our society for the better. The first investigative journalist was a woman (Nellie Bly). The idea for public defenders came from a woman (Clara Foltz). Women invented computer programming languages (Ada Lovelace) AND wireless transmission (Hedy Lamarr). Kevlar? Windshield wipers? CCTV? All women. The entire genre of science fiction began because of a woman's novel (Mary Shelley)."

You REALLY don't want to get into is a tit-for-tat over what sex has been the most inventive. You will lose this argument. Trust me on this. For every invention by women, there have been thousands more by men. If men and women were equal in this endeavor then 50% of ALL inventions should be by women. But they never will be for the same reason that women athletes don't compete with males: biology.

"How about we acknowledge that women are incredibly worthwhile human beings, and so are men, and start giving people reasons and incentives to raise families together? Without sabotaging either one's life."

We already had this for tens of thousands of years. It's feminist that came along and taught women that having children is tantamount to slavery and they'd be better served working for (male-dominated companies) and being childless corporate slaves instead.

Osjajeo, The Economist 2 Comments [4/1/2017 8:44:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125895

Ain't gonna be no morning after pill in the kingdom. You black, Hispanic, and native woman are going to bare children and your going love it. And your going to be sharing your man rather you like it or not

Asar'el Ben Israel, Facebook 10 Comments [4/1/2017 8:43:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 125886

There are two societal cataclysms set to collide in the West, and unless we foresee them, as CH has foreseen them, and actively prevent their efflorescence, the West is doomed.

The Sexbot Revolution (it’s happening), in conjunction with the introduction of the male Pill, will upend the sexual market and bring chaos to long-established and evolved implicit rules of conduct. The biggest impact will be a reduction in the asking price of women (in normie terms: a lot of sub-hottie women will have to date below their league if they don’t want to be alone). Sexbots, and other realistic simulacra of sex with a hot woman, will occupy the attention and, ahem, energy of a mass of omega and beta males who will prefer the intense experience of release with their Minka Kelly lookalike bots over uninspiring sex with the human plain janes and fatties who would normally be their lot.

What sexbots and VR tech (yolodecks) will essentially create is a massive unemployment crisis among Western women. These castaways will struggle to find love and marriage (which is a woman’s prime purpose in life). Omega males and those marginal rejects on the left hand side of the beta male curve will also be out of the sexual market, but their joblessness won’t hit them as psychologically hard as it does beta women, because the men will be the jobless equivalent of “not seeking work”, content to wile away their recreational time (by then almost all their time) in the uncannily supple bosoms of their sexbots.

Alpha men will take up the IRL slack and collect large de facto, and by that time de jure, harems of girlfriends, wives, and mistresses. It won’t be long after sexbots become affordable that there will be changes in law to permit polygyny (one alpha man, many women). Polygyny is Africa, if you need a picture in your head.

After a while, there will be sexbots for women, though the technology to make a realistic male sexbot will have to be far more advanced, given that lonely women will want them mostly for romantic pillow talk, intuitive understanding, and household chores.

***

The Robot Revolution (it’s been happening) will squeeze the sexual market from the other end. Just as mass Dirt World immigration has gutted the wages of working class men and fueled the opioid epidemic in their towns, the mass immigration of robots into the job market will place more downward pressure on the wages of blue collar men and in most cases drive them completely out of work, with no hope of new market niches opening up that don’t require high IQ and educational attainment to realistically enter.

Eventually, like with male sexbots filling the sexual market vacuum left by female sexbots, carnally-neutral industrial robots will move into pink collar and even some white collar occupations, putting a lot of “Gay Mulatto’s people” out of work. In fifty years, robots will be doing accounting, legal, administrative, HR, data entry, reporting, and maybe even programming jobs. That’s a lot of “new economy” jobs removed from human circulation by robots. It won’t be just service industry grunts or farmhands who bear the brunt of automation.

Think of it this way: industrial and commercial robots replace repetitive motion and repetitive thinking tasks, sexbots replace repetitive relationship and repetitive reproduction tasks.

Any repetitive motion or thinking task can be automated, and will be if the FREE MARKET is left to its invisible hand devices. The same goes for sexbots putting metaphorical pink collars out of work.

The Luddism counter-argument that usually comes up when this topic stirs libertardians from their vape dens falls immediately flat on close inspection. Automobiles (proto-robots) put a lot of horses out to pasture, with no chance for job retraining because horses aren’t very smart and can’t be taught C++. These excess horses were killed for dog meat and soap, or returned to the wild to fend for themselves. There are limits to market niche exploitation and economic mobility; each new and improved automation revolution ratchets up the cognitive demands on those “put out to pasture” by the robot technology.

As robots take over ever more low-, mid-, and high-skill jobs, the humans formerly employed in those jobs simply won’t have the IQ horsepower or suitable temperament to adequately retrain themselves in the chaotically reoriented job market that will be created in the wake of the robot economy. It’s pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking to presume a longshoreman can be retrained to, say, program robot algorithms. And all those lawyers and paralegals who lose their jobs to automation will have a tough time trying to learn principles of electrical conductance.

The ones who will be spared the negative externalities of the robot and sexbot revolutions will be those whose creativity, fluid intelligence, spontaneity, and incomparable sexuality can’t be sufficiently mimicked by artificial substitutes. Perhaps street artists will be lucky enough to avoid joblessness in our robot overlord future, whatever income pittance they must accept for their artistic vision, and be free to carry on snarking about “Trumpkins” and “redneck methheads”.

Alpha males won’t have to worry about sexbots; for them, the sexbot revolution will create a pornucopia of delights as they are besieged by desperate women who literally can’t find a man because three quarters of them are locked in their bedrooms completely satiated from week-long sessions with their Ivanka Trumpbots. Slender hot babes will still have a real man to call their own….as long as they’re ok with him calling additional women his own. I’m not saying this to spite anyone; I’m a messenger of sexual market reality, and I’m telling you this is what’s most likely to happen when armies of hot babe substitutes are introduced into the field of courtship. Sexbots will skew the sex ratio and that has mate choice implications that greatly amplify the affects of vidgya gaming and YouFap.

The Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance won’t have to worry about job-stealing robots (at first), unless AI progresses to the point that Skynet makes human class distinctions irrelevant (in the “wipe all the classes out” way). So don’t expect our queer leaders to do anything to stop the robot, or sexbot, invasions. If anything, they’ll encourage the sexbot and robot takeover, assuming its the best intervention to mollify the uppity masses.

The remaining mystery is what, exactly, all those jobless Westerners will buy with the money they’re not making. Mass joblessness means sexbots rotting on the shelves. The 1% will become the 0.0001% and there won’t be enough wealthy investors to keep the robot revolution moving forward. There will have to be an injection of money from somewhere, and that will mean the government printing money like it’s going out of style, to pay all those now-expendable humans a guaranteed basic income. Inflation will, must, return with a fury.

Alternatively, robots will decrease the price of almost all consumer goods so dramatically (due to low extraction and production overhead and zero human labor costs) that everything one could want will cost pennies, and we will have a society like the Wall-E spaceship, all needs catered and pleasures serviced by round-the-clock robots and sexbots, as we get fatter, weaker, stupider, lazier, more feminized, and less rebellious toward the disappearance of meaning from our lives. Government will exist primarily to regulate the profits that the top 0.00001% — those who own the robot-operated factories and distribution centers — can skim from their enterprises, because there will be democratically-elected incentive to keep the prices of goods affordable for people making no more than the Fake Money from their Fake Incomes provided to them by Uncle Samantha.

What I am predicting, then, is a total fertility and financial collapse in the West not long after the robot and sexbot revolutions metastasize and Occupy Main Street. Robots will herald financial collapse from debt spending and money printing. Sexbots will herald fertility collapse from marriage abandonment and a mass exodus of men and women from the dating scene. Literally, currency and seed will be spilled fruitlessly into an empty abyss.

Cataclysms colliding. The people who voted for Trump, in their unarticulated way, are the first angsty salvos against this coming collision. Nationalism, race, and family are the only bulwarks that can stop the dystopian juggernaut, and that’s why the elite are in a frenzy to stump what Trump represents.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 14 Comments [4/1/2017 8:36:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
1 5 6 7 | top