1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | bottom
Quote# 126156

I can assure you that I'm not a homosexual, because the Bible does not allow for homos to exist in tandem with godly men and women, if there are any godly people left. The Bible plainly says that the vagina isn't godly or good, and women who abuse their flesh and dress like harlots are no better than men who abuse their flesh and are arrogant. I don't understand why anyone praises this liberal organ of Satan.

Elvis is King, FSTDT 12 Comments [4/9/2017 12:18:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126155

[In response to someone saying misandry is wrong]



misandry-mermaid, Tumblr 12 Comments [4/9/2017 12:18:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 126151

What I keep bringing up is that while physical underperformance is to be expected, women also are completely inferior in mental sports like Chess.

98% of all Chess Grandmasters are male. The 2% that are women reside at the bottom of the sample distribution. This is CHESS. It is the activity with the lowest possible barrier to entry, and women don’t even need men to practice with at all – they can just keep practicing with each other and keep improving. Yet, it does not happen. 98% of Chess Grandmasters are men, and that will not change.

That is I think even more damning than any physical sport.

Furthermore, the distribution of Chess Grandmasters by gender is probably a good indicator of gender contributions of useful work in a knowledge-based economy. Can anyone argue that a gender that produces only 2% of Chess Grandmasters can make a valuable contribution in the most high-cognitive fields?

Anon, Dalrock 4 Comments [4/9/2017 12:17:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126137

Putting one's willy in underage girls is wonderful, but let's be clear about what MRA is: our focus should be on fighting back against the state for hurting us in unfair and oppressive ways. Where you want to put your willy is really a personal rather than political matter; it just happens that one of the leading causes of injustice against men is perpetrated via prohibitions on underage sex, along with a corrupted definition of rape and so on, and that is why we talk about sex with minors so much

Eivind Berge, EIVIND BERGE'S BLOG 19 Comments [4/8/2017 2:00:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 126133

boys? you mean sex toys that are rude and don't even vibrate? no thank u

anxius, Tumblr 18 Comments [4/8/2017 1:59:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 126112

I realize that what I'm teaching is not popular these days, but in the old days of America when people still feared God and lived by the Bible, women behaved themselves and homes were much happier than today. Feminist women are quick to point out that women in the old days of America were oppressed, couldn't vote and were often viewed as commodities instead of women. That is Hollywood brainwashing. In the old days, men attended to business, while the women kept the home. Women were were better off in the old days of America, baking homemade pies and caring for her children.

Those who think women have it better today are insane, turning a blind eye to the 51,000,000 abortions, the millions of American women getting breast enlargements to boost their self-esteem and increase career-opportunities, women freezing their eggs in hopes of having a family in their 40's or 50's after achieving a successful career, working women are too busy to have a family... IT'S ALL CRAZY!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [4/8/2017 5:02:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: P.E.T.S

Quote# 126104

The Bible speaks in Proverbs 7:10 of the attire (clothing) of a harlot (prostitute). Anyone with sense knows what the attire of a harlot is, which includes a female wearing any of the following in public: miniskirts, halter tops, low-cut blouses, tights, see through dresses, lingerie, short skirts, bikinis, G-strings, bras, and any type of undergarments or panties.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 21 Comments [4/8/2017 5:01:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126085

I highly recommend that you read William Guy Carr's numerous books. Satanists teach that Satan had sex with Eve in the Garden of Eden. Satanist's entire belief system is rooted in human debasing sex-perversion. Thus, Satanism and sex are inseparable. With this disturbing truth in mind from Cmdr. Carr, it will become obvious to you just how evil and dangerous the sensual, promiscuous and sexualizing music videos of Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus, Carrie Underwood, and hundreds of other Satanic servants are!

Taylor Swift's Music & Videos Degrade Girls Into Sex Objects, Promoting Satanism

As an example of a very bad role model, and an evil whore, entertainer Taylor Swift (whose net worth is now $200,000,000) greatly harms young people with her music and videos. Taylor Swift is a spoiled brat, a disgrace to America, and another puppet of the Illuminati. Swift's music videos SEXUALIZE young teenage girls, teaching them that everything is all about sex, sex, sex.

Case in point is her despicable 2011 video “Better Than Revenge.” I cannot link to the video in good conscience, because it is so sexually promiscuous. The video features four beautiful teenage girls, all wearing tight mini-skirts, skin-tight pants, and they are shaking their rear-ends to seduce the viewer. One girl is filmed falling into a bed. At the end of the video, all four girls are in a bed. The girls are all wearing tight bras, literally shaking their breasts for the camera. From beginning to end Taylor Swift's video is SEXUALIZATION!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 8 Comments [4/7/2017 7:23:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 126078

Are women biologically programmed to reward cruelty, evil and domination?
Of course any complaints that girls go for bad boys and jerks instantly labels one a nice guy beta males. To the extent that it is possible, I actually consider myself somewhat of an impartial outside observer. I was an omega jerk in JR and high school, and to an extent my whole psycho personality, worked and I had girls literally chasing me. A lot of it might have been self-delusion but some measures were objective. After that I was in nearly complete isolation in college. So I've never played the role of the bitter nice guy. I have NEVER done anything nice for a girl or anyone my entire life! So I think I have some claim to impartiality, and my position that my deep depression and heart anguish is purely on a metaphysical level.

I read a lot of PUA seduction Game literature. At first my logic was it pays to learn all tools of rhetoric, persuasion and oratory even if I intended to put it to different uses than PUA.

Anyway to put it at its simplest. In cavemen times women were just plaything rape slaves for the strongest ape. And that is what evolutionary psychology in chimpanzee and gorilla behavior proves. Now there might have been some brave women who defended their freedom to the death, but their selfish genes were lost to history. And the genes that all modern women have inherited is those who submit to the cruelest caveman with biggest club.

I don't know for me it is pretty hellish to live in a world where all men are sadists and all women are masochists.

According to PUA science male physical attractiveness barely matters at all, the only thing women find attractive is brute domination and sadism.

For the last year I've completely cut myself off from humanity. Who wants to live in a world of pure evil? Only evil is rewarded! Cruelty is the only virtue. What good is morality and ethics?

So I'd like an outside opinion do you feel that women are biologically programmed to reward cruelty, evil and domination?

Does the dating world going back to the new paleolithic age make life worthless?
Murdoch's theoretical journal which is the official ideology of America and thus the entire world has endorsed the evopsych worldview: The New Dating Game | The Weekly Standard

Now I'm sure no one will believe me, but this is NOT about me being a single virgin loser guy who can't get a date. More its about what kind of world we live in where evil is always rewarded. I can't live in a universe like that. Why bother to get a job and support oneself and live in brutal ruthless dog eat dog world of evil? My parents are going to throw me out in August since I wont get a job or school.

Its true I've always been kind of an anti-sexual puritan but evopsych just makes it more vicious. The Darwinian-Nietzschean struggle for existence means eat or be eaten, kill or be killed, harm or be harmed. I wish simply to neither dominate nor be dominated. But that is far too much to ask in this world on both counts.

I have no harmed anyone, except maybe my parents. My dad says I should be "altrusitic" and recover for my mom's sake.

First off my parents committed a massive injustice on me by bringing me into this cruel world just to satisfy that monster gene- Moloch.

Second them keeping me alive, is just their genes following their selfish interest to reproduce. I represent a major investment in their genes survival. My fall means a major decrease in their genese reproducing. So that is all there is to their so-called generosity to me. The longer they keep me fed, the longer the opportunity there is for me to pass their genes on. Granted thats a pretty miniscule chance for grandkids hiding and crying in the basement, but its higher than the chances if I starved on the street.

So what gratitude should I have to the selfish gene? The "altruism" in feeding and housing me is just the flip side of the selfishness of birthing me into an incredibly hellish universe.

Humanity wants to drive itself off a cliff. I listed my objections. Much wiser men than me have listed them in thick textbooks. Humanity wont listen to the wise men and certainly not to me. So fine. I have said my peace. Let humanity drive off the cliff, but I want no part in the adventure.

I feel nothing for disgust for humanity. But thats what the Darwinian struggle for existence. Brutality is the only virtue. I'm what the Nazis would call life unworthy of life. Even if your content to be a lifelong virgin girls rewarding "bad boy" traits still affects the world you live in. I could not be more repulsed by humanity which is why I have cut myself off in complete isolation for nearly a year now. Would life be better, and free of despair if I saw other humans as unthinking moving objects instead of minds ?

From studying evopsych I have grown deeply disturbed and hateful of humanity. A bunch of sadistic beasts, red in tooth and claw, angling for domination. I wish to never see another human being ever again. I've cut myself off for over a year hiding in the basement till my parents throw me out.

Maybe it be better if I was unaware of humans possessing other minds. If I viewed them as rocks, chairs, hurricanes, viruses. Then I would have no more hate towards victimizers and sympathy towards victims than I hate cancer or a hurricane. Or pity for a dead tree. Just look at humans as moving objects on the landscape.

Would that make things better?

Well in essence this IS about relationships. That is where evolutionary psychology is most obvious in daily life. While it is true I have no human relations, I'm still affected by the sexual stock market, the same way someone who owns no stock can be ruined by a crash.

Psychologists are humans like the rest of us, driven by the reptilian urges for sex and power and domination. There career choice is just there way of gaining domination in the Darwinian game. So I don't see therapists as some elite priestly caste free from evopsych. I don't want to be "fixed" into better being able to play the evolutionary game.

Since everyone here accepts the basic premises of evopsych, I ask how do YOU folks deal with it? Or do you all just accept the game, and try to be the winner? IF thats the case, then maybe your right and there can not be any dialogue between me and humanity.

I don't understand how the rest of humanity can endure such a world and assume its because they must ALL be blood-thirsty vampires themselves.

Although why glorify women as the victims? According to evopsych even when given freedom they will reward cruelty.

So there are no victims in this monstrous world just wolves eating wolves.

How do you endure this world? And what is your advice for me?

What good would having a girlfriend do me? Is the chimpanzee in me supposed to rejoice that as low as I may be in the hierarchy, I still have someone below me who I can hurt, torment, dominate and abuse?


I have no problem being driven out of the sexual marketplace. The problem is what "service" are we competing for? And it seems in the sexual market it is who can be the most brutal and cruel. Evopsych says getting a girlfriend comes down to demonstrating cruelty, domination, brutality, and sadism.


That is all I see in male-female relations and PUa science backs up my personal observations.

Mopenhauer, halfsigma 6 Comments [4/7/2017 7:22:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Mayasmom

Quote# 126077

If you can stand it, I advise any incel to spend a few minutes perusing some female-oriented romantic literature, movies, manga, etc.

Do this, and try and note the personality traits of the male characters. I'm not just talking about the inevitable white knighting male lead character who saves the dumb annoying "quirky" female lead. Look at ALL the male characters. You'll notice certain themes and patterns.

1) Any man who is short or low-to-average attractiveness is fucking invisible. They are jokey side characters, comic relief, the nonthreatening best friend who never gets to fuck the lead female - that, or completely insignificant.

Lesson: This is the best any of us will ever do IRL. Females will see you as friend material, never fuck material. If they do get in a relationship with you (not likely) they will be pining for a tall handsome Chad all the while.

2) Men who ARE significant to the female's romantic arc will have the following traits: hard as nails, stoic, ambitious, unafraid of violence, dominant, a born leader, barks orders at people, strong jaw, large hands, is always grabbing the female lead or physically imposing himself on her (would be assault if a beta did it), faces down other males with a steely glint in his eye, is possessive and sexually jealous, yet will steal other men's girls at the drop of a hat, has good taste and dresses well in accordance with some recognizable stock male fashion trope.

Think about the traits of the male character females view as potential candidates for sex. And now apply some basic logic. What kind of person is this man? He's violent, he's brutal, he takes what he wants by force if necessary, he does and gets whatever he wants regardless of the risk to himself or others, he has no care for the rules or norms of society, he will fight to the death over a female, he will steal mates whenever possible. This person is a fucking degenerate, if everyone was like him, society would not last a day. He is a powderkeg, a walking time bomb who brings violence, chaos and disorder in his wake wherever he goes.

Yet this is what females are attracted to, in their heart of hearts. Fifty Shades. Twilight. Romantic comedies. Shoujo. K-drama. Insipid western medical dramas where the staff all sleep with each other. If it's female oriented this type of male character will abound, and devastation (social, sexual, often physical) will be the result.

Females prefer chaos and drama to stability, order and virtue. They want men fighting over her, the ability to maintain a harem of men with different traits (the noble protector, the dark selfish hedonist, the kind provider) who can give facilitate her experiencing different feelings when she's in the mood for them. Being universally wanted, breaking up other people's relationships while having the moral deniability of it being the fault of the men involved who just can't help but want her...

These things are sick, and yet, it is what FHOs desire. This is why men spent so long creating a system where the laws and customs of society and older, wiser heads determined who and when a female would marry, rather than just letting the FHO's selfish impulses run wild. The world is going to shit as a result of women's liberation and sadly, there is nothing that can be done to stop it.

As usual, the moral of the story remains the same: Lie down and fucking rot.


u/EveryDayIsANightmare, r/incels 13 Comments [4/7/2017 7:22:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: sister of battle

Quote# 125961

Have you heard of unbiased, peer reviewed academic research?

Take genealogy, history. Take the Bible and the Koran: All over history, men have married 15 year olds, 12 year olds, as the norm. Check anthropology: at what age do women in Hunter-Gatherer societies marry? And what age men do these women prefer? 12 year old boys or over 20 or over 30 year old powerful experienced men?

Then look at Charlie Chaplin. Rock stars in the 1970’s. Hugh Hefner. Men who get admired by adolescent girls.

Then check psychology: Show men the photos or video clips of 15 year old girls, tell them they are 19 (to overcome the ingrained fear of jail bait). See if they are interested or if they find these girls repulsive. You can even check with contraptions that measure penile growth, excitement.

This is how one does science. Your knee jerk reaction can not change past history.

Sadly, through feminist world dominance, feelings like yours did change the history of the last 50 years and of I dont know how many years ahead.

But, as long as it does not become criminalized, a few people like me will insist on telling the truth.

Human Stupidity, Political Correctness (PC), Taboos, Dogmas, Religion make even the Intelligent blind, irrational, "stupid". 7 Comments [4/7/2017 7:18:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 125927

As readers here are well aware, all feminists are really interested in is preventing male sexual access to young, good looking females, and in so doing, raising their own pitiful sexual market value. They will seize upon isolated cases of sexual murder to push through legislation that further restricts the free sex market, whilst encouraging the import of millions of Islamic rapefugees in order to produce a genuine rape culture, as well as inevitable growing Muslim political influence, that will lead to young women dressing conservatively and fearful to go out alone.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 3 Comments [4/7/2017 7:15:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: xavier

Quote# 125901

It is sinful rebellion for a wife to seek her own independence apart from her husband's authority. Men are controlling by nature, territorial and protective of what's theirs. This is my land, stay off it. This is my family, you talk to me first. That's a normal attitude for any man. If you want an equal relationship, then you are desiring a homosexual intellectual relationship.

Feminism is insane, wrongly labeling husbands as “controlling” for wanting to know where his wife is at. A man has every God-given right to inquire concerning his wife's whereabouts, activities, friends at all times. If you don't like that, then you have an unbiblical attitude. The sinful world rejects the Bible as being God's inspired Words. The heathen world doesn't recognize the Biblical right of a married man to “RULE OVER” his wife (Genesis 3:16). Feminists are rebels, who completely reject the Bible's teaching of wifely submission to her husband. A godly woman obeys her husband, giving him veto power over everything in her life.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 8 Comments [4/7/2017 7:15:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 125831

My wife mostly does what I tell her but sometimes she gets scared of sex with me. I'll admit I can be rough and I have kinks I'm into. But when I'm horny, I don't have time for her to say no

So I enforce the fact that in marriage, there is no saying no when it comes to sex. There is no rape. I reminded her of this very thing last night when she tried to tell me no. The sooner she understands, the faster she'll so crying and accept my cock up her ass, her pussy, her mouth, in her fucking ear. Whatever mood that strikes me.

Women need to learn their place in a man's world.

Anonymous, Raw Confessions 14 Comments [4/7/2017 7:11:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125785

What do you guys have against 16 year olds

Everyone dates them in the EU. Humans aren't robots that magically turn into adults. American men are stuck with used up grannies and apparently enjoy it.


Anonymous, Rifftrax Movie Requests 5 Comments [4/7/2017 7:09:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: TB Tabby

Quote# 125778

Escaping Inceldom feels a lot lot applying for jobs

Every time I read the job description for an entry level position they require the equivalent of 5 years of work experience in the field plus grade A social skills.

BradTheIncel, /r/incels 8 Comments [4/7/2017 7:09:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125777

Developing social skills? Kek, that's the difference between Chad and incels, good looks made Chad be accepted in society and naturally developing social skills while being liked by everyone, that's why there's no "shy" "weird" good-looking guy

Fucking bluepillers.

whywouldanyone, /r/incels 2 Comments [4/7/2017 7:08:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126074

(Submitter's note: Does anyone know how to draw tables here?)

The 1-to-10 scale is used to rate women's physical attractiveness. Tuthmosis states, "I use halves (.5s) to achieve a little more precision. The idea is that a girl who’s almost at that next level—but doesn’t quite have it takes to get the rating outright—will get a .5. I’ll also occasionally grant (or deduct) halves for “intangibles”—things like extraordinary sweetness (or bitchiness), a sexy vibe (or awkwardness), or a personal preference (though I’m quick to disclose the latter)."[1]

Tuthmosis has argued that the scale is pointless because "It seems we have to account for taste after all. . . . Guys rate their own catches high and others' low. Big-ballerism is rampant. . . . Most guys can't extrapolate. . . . Conversely, guys are easily fooled by camera tricks. . . . It's mental masturbation that breeds pointless arguments."[2] General Stalin notes, "Unfortunately, and I hate to say it, the 1-10 scale is difficult in practice. Generally men can agree whether or not a girl is attractive or not, but to get specifics on how attractive, as Tuth said, calls upon a lot of discretion. Using objective and universal characteristics like symmetry, physical fitness, hip-to-waist ratio, hygiene, etc. are decent points to go on, but everyone has a particular level of preference and ego that makes true objectivity impossible. Men have been referencing the 1-10 scale for an awful long time so I don't see it going anywhere and everyone has a general understanding of it. Dispute over specifics is where men just get into a pissing contest."[3]

MrXY writes, "A 7 is a girl I would describe as being 'pretty'. A 6 to me is 'cute' and an 8 is 'beautiful'".[4]

General Stalin writes:[5]

6/10 is average OK looks. Bangable and respectable but nothing to write home to mom about (not that you should be writing letters to your mom about your conquests)

7/10 is sort of perfect "girlfriend" territory. Where the girl is good looking enough to keep you interested in the long term, but not too good looking where she has a crazy ego or you get anxious about having to mate guard when you go out.

8/10 is where a girl is good looking enough to be able to start making money on her looks. Could be a stripper, bartender, IG hoe, fitness chick, etc. These girls are often crazy, especially where they live a fine line between normal and glamorous life style.

9/10 is a stunner. Model good looks. Gets tons of attention everywhere she goes because of her beauty. Can make a good living off of her looks alone. Most women at this level of physical beauty tend to shack up with wealthy/famous men because they can.

10/10 doesn't exists. No one is perfect. The idea of a "10" would be a girl that has something that a 9 has that makes her specifically more attractive per your personal tastes. Maybe you really fucking love gingers and this girl is a 9 who happens to have long red hair and freckles. There is your 10.


Hume's cheat sheet

L D. Hume notes that the appropriate level of investment in a girl?? depends on her rating:[6]
Rating Suitability for
Long term relationship Short term relationship Fuck buddy Booty call One night stand
1-4 No No No No Rarely
5 No No No No Sometimes
6 No No Sure I guess Yes Yes
7 No Yes Yes Yes Yes
8-10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Scale

0

Tuthmosis states, "No Such Thing. Has a dick."

1

Tuthmosis states, "Hideously Unattractive. A monster. Disfigured or irretrievably mutilated. Has two heads, is missing an eye, etc."

2

Tuthmosis states, "Very Unattractive. Disproportionate, morbidly obese."

3

Tuthmosis states, "Unattractive. Ugly, fat, and/or old."

4

Tuthmosis states, "Almost Bangable. But definitely doesn't pass the boner test. Still not good-looking." According to L.D. Hume, girls 4 and lower on the scale are suitable only for one night stands, and even then only when blackout drunk or when one has had sex with fewer than five girls in one's life and is trying to gain experience.

5

Tuthmosis states, "Merely Bangable. Barely passes the boner test. You’d be pretty embarrassed to be seen with her." Hume notes that having sex with such girls is "Almost always a result of excessive, yet not blackout amounts of alcohol. The 'last call at the club' slut coupled with a dry streak."

6

Tuthmosis states, "Almost Cute. She might be cute if one or two things were different, but they’re not. You may not be super-embarrassed to be seen with her, but you certainly wouldn't be proud, and you definitely wouldn't willingly bring her around to anything." Hume describes this as "actually the most dangerous category. The 6s are the most likely to finagle you into a relationship. The sheer number of 6s means you are bound to run into some that have a decent personality, or amazing blowjob skills. Your male hamster will start spinning, thinking about how her tight body overlooks the weird haircut and acne she has. Or how her cute face overrides her baby fat."

7

Tuthmosis states, "Solidly Cute. Zero embarrassment, even some nascent pride in being seen with her. You could bring her to things without looking bad, or losing any of the luster on your game." Hume notes that they are suited for short-term but not long-term relationships:

As to why they are not suited for a long term relationship, the reason is simple—there is just better out there in the world. There are 8s and above. So why, even though she is a cute girl and may have the personality traits to go along with it, settle for a 7? It’s a very very tough thing to advise against and even harder to put in practice. I’ve fallen into the trap myself several times.

The answer of course lies in something that most men have yet to experience. The feeling of dating an 8, which is exponentially better (though admittedly harder to pull off) than a 7. I’ve dabbled in this before and it does make a difference. Try to keep the 7s at bay for the short term relationships and everything below. Instead, use the time you would put LTR’ing a 7 into bettering yourself for the 8.


8

Tuthmosis states, "Hot-Cute. Would be straight-up proud to be seen with her or bring her to things. This is often the sweet spot for long-term relationship material."

9

Tuthmosis states, "Smoking Hot. This is a girl who can easily monetize her beauty. You’re going out of your way to be seen with her."

10

Tuthmosis states, "Perfection. A theoretical abstraction that only exists in the laboratory." Athlone McGinnis agrees.[7] According to Donovan Sharpe, tens don’t get hit on as often, are much more pleasant than you think, are extremely insecure, are so-so in bed, and are people too.[8]

Alternative Scales

philosophical_recovery notes, "The 1-10 as a rating scale will be debated until people stop using it. It's been pointed out before that a much better scale is something more like WNB->WB->WHR->WI, or, Would Not Bang -> Would Bang -> Would Hit Raw -> Would Impregnate".[9]

The late comedian Patrice O'Neal devised a thirty-point scale, with 0-10 being degrees of "ugly looking women", 11-20 being degrees of "alright looking women", and 21-30 being degrees of "beautiful women."[10]

Roosh mentioned both the 1-10 scale and the "binary scale" (with 0 being WNB and 1 being WB) in an early article.[11]

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 12 Comments [4/6/2017 12:43:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126073

The ages of women and their characteristics and experiences at these ages are as follows.

Age 18

According to Heartiste, "This is the age — from teenager to mid-20s — when a woman is in her nubile prime. Physically and emotionally she is at her horniest, her most feminine, and, not coincidentally, her most discriminating. She’s on the prowl for an alpha male, and specifically for a charming jerkboy whose devil-may-care attitude speaks so forcefully to her deep desire to submit to a top tier man with limitless lover options."

He also notes, "Hard to believe, but it is often easier to bed a very young woman than an older woman, if you are an older man. This is because 20-40% of women are specifically attracted to older men. It is hard-wired in them, and this hard-wiring can be reinforced by poor family upbringing resulting from divorce of parents or absentee fathers. Single moms are the greatest source of future generations of slutty daughters the world has ever known. . . . You can bang an 18-21 year old surprisingly quickly because they have little ASD (anti-slut defense). This is because they do not have the long history of sluttiness common to older women which needs to be rationalized away by posturing as a paragon of chaste virtue. A young woman simply won’t perceive sex with you as an admission of sluttiness. She is innocent to herself as well as to you."[1]

Roosh notes, "She is child-like and mostly intolerable. Her speech sounds like another language. She will only have sex when completely trashed, and has few redeeming qualities beyond her body. Says a lot of things that make you think you’re wasting your time. Best game to use: jealousy."[2]

Age 21

Hank Moody notes that a girl 21-25 "appreciates that I'm not writing her odes about my undying love and affection, and seem to want to keep things casual. They're getting hit up at every angle, and they're confused about whether they want to fuck the bartender or the lawyer. Then they realize they can do both with little ramification. I like being seen around town with them. Horrible conversationalists, and I have to dumb down my text messaging. Most of their texts are 'lol ur funny..' Society has told these girls that they can be total whores with no consequences, and eventually some good looking rich guy will scoop them up."[3]

Age 22

The four-year carnival called college is coming to a close. During this time, she’s enjoyed the absolute ride of her life: non-stop parties (as a true Carousel rider), trips, and gorging herself on the buffet of cock available to an American college girl—without the uncomfortable social stigmas of generations past. At a time where previous generations of women were getting nervous if they hadn’t snared a husband, today’s girl is “just getting started.” At this age, today’s girl is irretrievably drunk on her power. Any cautionary advice will be greeted with hubristic ridicule and disbelief.

Age 23

Roissy notes, "The 23-27 year old feels she is at her attractiveness peak, despite her peak having passed a few years earlier. This is because she is surrounded by many more high status men than she was while in college (or working at the Piggly Wiggly) who are expressing sexual interest in her. This social dynamic will work to inflate her ego beyond the bounds of her actual beauty ranking."[1]

Age 25

The first alerts—which go unheeded—that this ride isn’t forever start to rear their heads. The combination of a few harsh pump-and-dumps, and the knowledge that some of her smarter friends are getting hitched, start to impart a hard edge on her personality. Still, with ample beauty left over, most girls will continue to draw from the bank account with impunity. Heartiste writes, "During this age window — late 20s to late 30s — a woman is powerfully aware of the beginning of decline in her number one asset: her beauty. Physically, she is noticing small changes in herself — the first nascent signs of decay — that, assessed from a distance relative to womanhood as a whole aren’t so horrifying, but compared to what she was herself just a few years earlier will split her id wide open. Urgency compels her (if she’s psychologically healthy) to escape the single lady lookatme scene and start seriously buckling down to achieve the goal of snagging a man who will commit to her and, hopefully, help her become part of a family. Naturally, this pressure to settle limits her options and the longer she waits, the more her “Mr. Right” will deviate from the Mr. Right of her teenage dreams."

According to Roosh, "After you wear the t-shirt a couple of times, the fabric loses elasticity. You no longer get excited when wearing it because people have already seen you in it. Your eye starts to wander on new t-shirts (25-29 years old)." Also, according to Roosh's T-shirt analogy, "When you leave the loaf out, it gets a little hard. You have to heat it up with a toaster first, but it still won’t taste fresh. (25-29 years old)"

Roosh also writes, "single women over 25 are emotionally damaged in some way, are alpha widowed, or are professional daters who are incapable of making the proper relationship sacrifices."[4]

Age 26

Hank Moody notes that a girl 26-30 is "Still hot enough to be seen around town with, but they start throwing serious girlfriend vibes - particularly public displays of affection. Sex is practically thrown at you after a few months of dating. You're that good looking rich guy who is going to scoop them up. They know the biological clock is ticking fast, and their family is pushing them to 'settle down.'"

Age 27

Rollo notes, "By the age of 27 women’s SMV decline has begun in earnest. That isn’t to say that women can’t remain stunningly attractive and vivacious in their post-peak years, but comparative to the next crop of 22-23 year olds, the decline progressively becomes more evident. Competition for hypergamously suitable mates becomes more intense with each passing year. The age’s between 27 and 30 are subliminally the most stressful for women as the realization sinks in that they must trade their ‘party years’ short term mating protocol for a long term provisioning strategy."[5]

Age 28

Roissy notes, "28-30 year olds are a mixed bunch. Some are riding a wave of career and social success that has nowhere to go but down, and their bloated egos reflect that. Others, less conventionally successful, are emotionally frazzled by the disappearing act of their heady youth and by the intractability of their singledom. You will find some of the cuntiest, and sweetest, girls in this age range."[1]

Age 29

After repeated pressings of the snooze button, it starts getting harder to ignore the clangor of the alarm clock. Having gotten her fill on the party lifestyle—and starting to feel, if not fully understand, the diminished effectiveness of her fading looks—she declares herself “ready to settle down.” Regrettably, the combination of having very little beauty-capital remaining and impossibly high standards—the product of years of enjoying the high life at the expense of her future solvency—will conspire to keep her single.

Age 30

According to Roosh, "If you leave the bread out for too long, mold develops. You can cut away the mold, toast the bread, and still be able to eat it, but you won’t enjoy it. You’d have to be starving. (30-34 years old)"

Hank Moody notes that a girl 30-36 "Is either divorced or has never been married for a reason. Anthropomorphizes their dog or cat. Struggles with depression issues. Sex is thrown at you. They know that the good looking rich guy is never going to come, and you're simply here for sex and conversation. At this point they would settle for almost any beta willing to commit and risk a geriatric pregnancy."

Heartiste notes that "a man marrying an over-30 woman is investing everything he has in a rapidly depreciating pleasure provider that has already lost a lot of its aesthetic value."[6]

The over-30 woman has likely amassed an impressive knob count. When you marry a 30+ woman, you’re marrying her 30+ cockas. Hope you like getting phantom cucked! As magically prehensile as your penis may be, she’ll never look up to it in cross-eyed awe like she did with her first cock when she was younger, hotter, tighter, and inexperienced.

The over-30 woman is bitter from a wasted prime spent on failed relationships she hoped would lead to marriage. Now that you’re marrying her, she should be grateful, but she's not. . . . .

There’s another, subtle, reason to refuse the wedded diss of marrying the over-30 woman. Now, naturally, if you marry an under-30 woman, the day will come, ostensibly, that she’ll be your over-30 wife. But you’ll have something that chagrined men who married women on the cusp of sagging cups don’t have: Years of very fond, very monopolized, very supple memories. If you maritally snag a 21-year-old minx and occupy her sugar walls for the next ten years, the spermatomically bonded cervix-splattered glue of all those splendid tumbles of passion accrue into something larger than the sum of your individuated speckles. All that young woman heat, heat which will never be replicated with the older version of your wife, captures into limbic amber a network of interlocked, superconductive emotions with the power to sustain lovingrapture a good ways past the poignantly brief era of peak wife ripeness, onward into the elevator muzak era of bland marital inertia (50 years, plus or minus).

You marry an over-30 woman and you’re left grasping at a grease truck menu of curdled, pear-shaped memories and wrinkled recollections for sustenance.


According to trav777, "a woman at 31 is looking for a marriage and kid as a BUCKET LIST ITEM. She is not looking for a husband or a partner or obligations. If she were into that more than herself, she’d have landed a decent man 10 years prior."

Relampago Furioso notes that at 30, the thousand cock stare often develops.[7]

Age 31

Roissy notes:[1]

In some ways, women in the 31-34 age range are the toughest broads to game. (By “toughest”, it is meant “most time consuming”.) It’s counterintuitive, yes, but there are factors at work besides her declining beauty which mitigate against the easy, quick lay. For one, it is obviously harder to meet single 31-34 year old women than it is to meet single younger women. Marriage is still a pussy-limiting force to contend with for the inveterate womanizer, but Chateau apprentices are hard at work battling the scourge of mating market disturbances caused by the grinding and churning of the marriage machine.

But the bigger reason 31-34 year olds are harder to game than any other age group of women has to do with the wicked nexus of entitlement and self-preservation that occurs at this age in women. When you combine a disproportionate sense of entitlement fueled by years of feminism, steady paychecks and promotions, and cheerleading gay boyfriends with suspicions of every man’s motives and a terrible anxiety of being used for a sexual fling sans marriage proposal, you get a venom-spitting malevolent demoness on guard against anything she might perceive as less than total subjugation to her craving for incessant flattery and princess pedestaling.


Age 32

The magical years are officially gone, and the long descent to complete invisibility to the opposite sex is well underway. Thanks to social programming (e.g., Sex in the City and the myth that “a woman’s sexual prime is in her 30s”), she can rationalize that her “Mr. Right” will arrive any minute. However, she’s likely to become little more than a second- or third-stringer in a player’s long roster of options. A few of these women will get bailed out by blue-pill betas, who still buy into the marriage trap, and don’t realize (or care) they’re buying a used car with the odometer rolled back. But this marriage is almost certainly doomed to divorce-failure, since nothing can ever compete with her 15-year prime-time binge. She will be nagged by dissatisfaction the moment her last party–her wedding–ends.

She enjoyed the Sweet 15, but she’ll enjoy little more.

GBFM writes that with 32-year-olds, it's necessary to get a "leaf-blower to get all the dust off".

Age 35

According to Roosh's T-shirt analogy, "Eventually, holes develop in the fabric. It has been used too many times. Now it is only good to clean the toilet bowl before finally being placed in the trash. (35 and up)." Also, according to his bread analogy, "If you leave it for even longer, mold takes over and completely destroys the bread. There is no way to excise the toxic portions. You must throw it away before the mold makes you sick. (35 and up)" Relampago writes:[8]

Women “expire” at age 35 for numerous reasons. Their fertility declines sharply at this age. Their beauty declines, no matter how much makeup they cake on. If not already married to her, from this moment forward she offers nothing to a partner but a well-used piece of anatomy and a manipulative, even predatory disposition towards men and their finances.

The expiration date may fluctuate around age 35 for a couple of reasons, i.e. good genetics or a sweet personality (usually being faked) but this age is a good baseline for the “expiration date” for females.


Age 40

Heartiste writes, "The final romantic life cycle for women (ages 40-death), this stage is the longest and, sadly from the perspective of one who adores women when they are at their most womanish, the dreariest, though it does offer as consolation a tranquilizing serenity that can safely usher a woman through her middle years without resort to painkillers. In this cycle, a woman still harbors those tingles for the alpha jerk, but they are sufficiently suppressed by biomechanic winding-down and stone cold circumstance — her wilted bloom — to allow the flourishing of her other female needs. Those other needs center around her desire to a) not be abandoned to a cold cruel sexual market and b) enjoy at least facsimiles of reciprocal love so that she does not feel abandoned within her relationship."

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 11 Comments [4/6/2017 12:43:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126072

A pump-and-dump is the term for a "one night stand" from a masculine perspective; that is, quickly meeting then having sex with a girl followed by breaking contact with her without remorse. Slutty women are sometimes referred to as "pump-and-dump material". In the manosphere, the pump-and-dump is controversial because men naturally want woman to have sex with them easily but at the same time cannot respect a woman who gives up sex with next to no commitment.

It is advisable to take precautions when planning for sex with pump and dumps, including but not limited to, ensuring contact information is not exchanged and/or she does not know your last name since the risk of a false rape accusatibon is increased.

Woman who have been pumped and dumped on multiple occasions begin to take on characteristics of Thousand cock stare. More pump and dumps tend to wear heavily on the female psyche and instances of it are generally kept secret from her friends.

A pump-and-dump is nothing more than a one-time answer to a physical necessity, requiring no maintenance and a very low investment of time. It is the lowest rank of "relationship", lower even than fuck buddy.[1]

Variants
Smash-and-dash
Hit it-and-quit it
Fuck-and-chuck
Nail-and-bail
Bash-and-dash

Kings Wiki, Kings Wiki 4 Comments [4/6/2017 12:42:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126062

People who are angry and hateful like you turn off people of feminism. Same thing with the lgbt ppl who say hateful things about heterosexuals but then turn around and then wonder why they don't have very many allies....




Pretty sure we have lots of allies, gay allies are everywhere. What a failure of a comparison.

Also if some dudebro is so turned off by my distrust of men then he was never going to hear me out when it comes to patriarchal violence and rape culture. I didn’t turn him off of feminism, he was never going to listen in the first place. It’s not a loss that I didn’t have to waste my time holding his hand.

GeekAndMisandry, tumblr 18 Comments [4/6/2017 12:41:16 AM]
Fundie Index: -8

Quote# 126047

An investigation by The New York Times has found a total of five women who have received payouts from either Mr. O’Reilly or the company in exchange for agreeing to not pursue litigation or speak about their accusations against him. The agreements totaled about $13 million.

Two settlements came after the network’s former chairman, Roger Ailes, was dismissed last summer in the wake of a sexual harassment scandal, when the company said it did not tolerate behavior that “disrespects women or contributes to an uncomfortable work environment.”

The women who made allegations against Mr. O’Reilly either worked for him or appeared on his show. They have complained about a wide range of behavior, including verbal abuse, lewd comments, unwanted advances and phone calls in which it sounded as if Mr. O’Reilly was masturbating, according to documents and interviews.

The reporting suggests a pattern: As an influential figure in the newsroom, Mr. O’Reilly would create a bond with some women by offering advice and promising to help them professionally. He then would pursue sexual relationships with them, causing some to fear that if they rebuffed him, their careers would stall.

Bill O'Reilly, The New York Times 10 Comments [4/5/2017 1:07:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Penguis

Quote# 126042

In Eastern Europe I don’t get the achingly painful sense of regret at seeing a pretty 14 year old girl and thinking that by the time she is legal, she will already be losing her youthful charm and beauty. The fact is, in the UK, and even in countries such as France and Germany, the majority of girls are burnt out, bitter, overweight slags by the time they reach 18. Because of diet, lifestyle, and genetics, even pretty 14 year olds do start to lose it by the time they are off to university. In Eastern Europe, puberty arrives a little later, lasts longer, and everywhere you turn there are 20 year old women who are ravishingly beautiful, have perfect skin, possess the long slim legs of ballerinas, and who wear elegant fashions with a graceful air

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 7 Comments [4/5/2017 1:04:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: jim beam

Quote# 126041

A few of you may have noticed that I’ve required commentators to log in. This cuts down on the schizoid paedophile and/or feminist trolls I’ve been suffering from lately, as well as ‘ephebophiles’ just using the comments section here to dump their own incoherent rants. In other words, 90%+ of the comments here.

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 6 Comments [4/5/2017 1:04:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: jim beam

Quote# 126037

Women are sexually fluid

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/1180409/this-is-the-fascinating-reason-women-have-evolved-to-become-bisexual/

Females do not have a sexual orientation. They just have sex with whoever turns them on wether he is a man, a woman, a shemale or whatever. They are not necessarily attracted to either men or women. They do not specifically crave a penis or a vagina. They just go with whatever gets them wet at the moment.

thegambler953, /r/incels 11 Comments [4/5/2017 12:12:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | top