1 2 3 4 5 7 | bottom
Quote# 128584

The topic of this post could easily bloom into an oceanic algae field of effortful analysis, but I intend to keep this particular foray succinct.

Libchicks HATE HATE HATE Meaty Intruder Trump because he is iconic maleness.

It’s Trump’s unapologetic masculinity — and by association the happy masculinity of his supporters — that gets under the speckled hides of the Femcunt Fuggernaut.

The general direction of Western Civ over the last decades has been away from masculinity and toward androgyny. Femininity is under attack as well, but so far has avoided the kind of vitriolic (((propaganda))) that’s been leveled against all forms and expressions and attitudes of masculinity.

Trump is a direct rebuke to the anti-masculinity and anti-male agenda. Precisely, the anti-White male agenda. He is the distillation in one man of everything that drives bitterbitches crazy with hatelust.

He speaks his mind.
He never grovels for approval.
He refuses to regurgitate the symbolic catchwords of feminist and antiracism cant.
He loves women with sexually explicit vigor and remorseless objectification.
He has a child with a much younger, beautiful model wife.
He has multiple children by former wives he has continually traded up for fresher pussy.
He uses his wealth, charm, and power to seduce women.
He tacitly reminds women that they are complicit in his seduction, welcoming his advances when they are young and not in the employ of hillary clinton’s shadow orgs.
He holds a mirror up to women’s rapacious, animalistic sexual natures.
He is a chad who loves being a chad.
He is a doer instead of a talker.
He builds, rather than blathers.
He is a Gizmo, not a Paperwork and Lawyering drone.
He has Game.
He mocks liars, gossips, and degenerates.
He fights, and shames cowards.
He has ridiculed feminist beliefs and representatives and come away unscathed, even stronger than before.
He reminds women that their own men — their very own beta male bootlickers — may think the same things as Trump and pursue the same pleasures if they had Trump’s stones and Trump’s options.

Iconic Maleness embodied by Trump is the hot branding phallus that penetrates the hunchbacked ids of bitter women and the manginas who are fated to settle for them. Trump and his Trumpericans spotlight and magnify the romantic failures and futility of the Nasty Women and the Girly Boys. It’s no wonder they hate him; he’s a Big Beautiful TruthWall looming high above the muck and blocking their desperate ego-soothing escape into self-deluding fantasy.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 1 Comments [6/27/2017 9:52:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 128558

A woman ruined my gymcelling attempt for LITERALLY NO REASON

I'm ugly but my only redeeming feature is that I am 5 foot 11 inches

So I figured let me go and get ripped, surely that will work. I been doing this for the past month with small results.

Today I was on the treadmill and there was a chick, 7/10 on the one next to me. All the others were occupied. As soon as I got on she took one look. I thought for once, maybe she's admiring me. LOL. She made a disgusted face. Seeing it, I made an angry face but I wasn't staring at her.

Fucking bitch literally fucking says "muscles wont do anything for you" like she had a fucking bad day and took it out on me. I'm shaken at this point so I go "Why don't you mind your business you stupid cunt" At this point I seem very angry on the outside, but on the inside I'm crying

Fucking cunt gets off the treadmill. Calls security and says I called her a cunt and other shit (Idk what she said but she definitely made shit up). The guard (big guy who usually stands near the door, IDK if he's a guard or what but he sure looked like one) asked me what the problem was, made me get off the treadmill and started scolding me near the lobby/shoe rack.

I was literally shivering at this point. Wore my shoes and went off. I don't ever wanna see that gym again but I HAVE A FUCKING 3 MONTH MEMBERSHIP and those cunts definitely arent giving me my money back

GiftMeARope, /r/incels 10 Comments [6/27/2017 10:22:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128557

[LIFE FUEL]I made a young slut prostitute cry

LMAO. I'm ECSTATIC right now

I know a guy who's basically a pimp and like half an hr ago, out of rage, I called and asked for a hooker. I mentioned young and blonde. She arrived like 20 minutes ago.

Once we exchanged info she just wanted to get over with it. Took her top off and was wearing a lacy bra underneath. Had a nice ass under her jeans shorts. She looked at me and made a disgusting face. At this point I got a little pissed.

She is EXACTLY the Stacy you imagine. the one who shuns incels. The one who makes up lies about us because we're subhuman. The one who would NEVER, EEEVEVVVEEERRRRRRRR EVER touch you in any other situation.

Conversation went soemthing like this: Me: Why that face? Her: Ugh.. just shut up

Now she looks away and sits on my lap. Literally looks away from me. I don't care, and I wrap my arm around her waist. Her skin feels like awesome soft rubber even though she's a fucking slut. I feel mixed emotions.

I spoke to her about why she needed money and she opens up totally. She basically said her dad kicked her out and stopped supplying her with money after she spent shit tons of his money without him knowing. AND she slutted around with one of his golf friends(probably 40 year old past-his-prime Chad). Of course, she didnt say it like that. She acted like her dad was a comic book villain but I could clearly see the story. Power of the black pill. I feel sorry for her dad but good for him, kicking the ungrateful slut out.

I'm sitting there actually wondering how this bitch can be so ungrateful and retarded.

Me: How old are you? Her: 20 Me: Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh do you go to college? Her: No Me: When did you realize your life was going downhill? Her: .............. ......... excuse me? at this point she gets up

I get up too and pull her closer. She seems pissed but lets me. So while I was feeling up her tits and grinding against her as she was disgusted I go "You don't seem very smart, what if this is how you spend the rest of your life?"

She yelled FUCK YOU and her voice cracked(she was about to cry). Wore her clothes. I was like "Don't cry" while laughing and she burst into tears and left

This is basically the gist of it. My mind is so hazy from enjoying the physical contact and being a sadist that I can barely get my thoughts together.

I am officially not only physically, but mentally a subhuman too. My personality is dogshit now. But it doesnt fucking matter. LOL. This is not me being bitter, fellow cels. This is one day I'm actually happy. I didn't have sex, but I will call that pimp and ask for THIS EXACT girl to fuck tomorrow.

I'm thinking of putting it on Youtube(not the sex, me trolling the whores) but Im not sure if it's illegal and I don't want trouble with the pimp.

By the way, bitch saved me $400 by leaving which I WILL be spending tomorrow :) Fuck this incel life.

GiftMeARope, /r/incels 14 Comments [6/27/2017 10:21:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128556

I just don't understand why normies bully us when they are the ones that should be treating us like kings and thanking us.

Think about it. If incels were never born or if we all decided to commit mass suicide, guess who would be the new incels? YUP, NORMANS. Since beauty is comparative, if we didn't exist, the new subhumans would be today's normies. By me breathing and staying alive, I am giving Normans a chance to succeed in life.

They all want us dead, but they don't know the consequence of that. The new bottom of the barrels would be the 5-7s. Forget sub 8, sub 10 would be a suicide sentence.

So how about you normies show some respect and acknowledge what we are doing for you huh? Your little girlfriend would leave you as soon as we all die since you would be the new subhumans. So show us some fucking respect and be grateful that we exist so you don't have to face what we face.

failednormie, /r/incels 10 Comments [6/27/2017 10:19:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128555



BlackpilledIncel, Imgur 6 Comments [6/27/2017 10:18:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128563

Feminists hate male virgins

Heard it from the mouth of a feminist today.

A guy in my calculus class got a pefect grade on a test and this feminist who sits in front of me said to her friend: "he must be a virgin anyway"

This was after the professor praised the guy.

acenosk, /r/incels 8 Comments [6/27/2017 5:01:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128559

[Summary: False dichotomy between "looks are completely irrelevant" and incel crackpottery. Conspicuously silent on numerical results. Also a "wonderful" demonstration of neochauvinists' failures at understanding biology and a nightmare to format.)

The Black Pill backed up by hard data and facts.

Preface:

All cursive text is not my own, they are quoted from the articles sourced under every title.

Black Pill Edition: Female nature
____
The relevance of personality as a petulant farce

____
Small Appetizer
____
Before we start with the more serious studies let me present you a small appetizer to stimulate the intake of the Black Pill.
____
A couple of years ago OkCupid conducted an interesting experiment. January 15th, 2013 was proclaimed by OkCupid as “Love is Blind Day” to celebrate the launch of a blind dating app released on that same day.

During “Love is Blind Day”, pictures were removed from OkCupid for a total of 7 hours and so data was gathered and the way people interacted with each other visibly changed!


As you can see, there was more and deeper conversation with an increase in exchange of personal information. A vast improvement for everyone! So, it seemed.

Here’s what happened next:

When the photos were restored at 4PM, 2,200 people were in the middle of conversations that had started “blind”. Those conversations melted away. The goodness was gone, in fact worse than gone. It was like we’d turned on the bright lights at the bar at midnight.

Summarized in this graph.

Starting from the moment OkCupid released the photos, conversations died down almost immediately. The conversation life expectancy dropped nearly 30% just two messages later in the thread when the photos were back on.



There was another also another smaller experiment, that can be summarized by this excerpt:

We took a small sample of users and half the time we showed them, we hid their profile text. That generated two independent sets of scores for each profile, one score for “the picture and the text together” and one for “the picture alone.” Here’s how they compare. Again, each dot is a user. Essentially, the text is less than 10% of what people think of you.

The second graph.

The text makes almost no difference on how you’re viewed.



Lastly, there was also the experiment where Okcupid let people predict personality based on profiles. In this case a beautiful picture strongly correlates with a beautiful personality when you let people be the judge. Third graph.

Conclusion:

Photos have a greater impact on the course of a conversation than the intimacy of that same conversation, which displayed the personality of both correspondents. The text added to your profile meant to introduce your characteristics, plays an insignificant role next to the photo. Your personality will be established in advance primarily based on your photo.

source: https://theblog.okcupid.com/we-experiment-on-human-beings-5dd9fe280cd5


What is beautiful is good, really good.
____
It's commonly known that "looks matter", but have you asked yourself the question: How much do they matter? Especially in regards to the widely and heavily emphasized personality?

Let us take a look in some more professional studies who have pondered this same question.
____
In the year 2015, a study in Italy (subject: social psychology) researched the effects of attractiveness, status and gender on the evaluation of personality.

quote:

Present research examines the combined effects of attractiveness, occupational status, and gender on the evaluation of others’ personality, according to the Big Five model.



I chose this particular study, because it's recent and the first of it's kind. A myriad of older studies have already concluded that perceiving a person as good looking fosters positive expectations about personal characteristics (1).

The effects of attractiveness are strong and pervasive. As Langlois et al. (2000) underline in their meta-analysis, attractiveness is a noteworthy advantage for both children and adults in almost every domain. Based on the “what is beautiful is good” effect (Dion et al., 1972), several studies (Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991); Feingold, 1992; Langlois et al., 2000) demonstrated that this phenomenon functions as a stereotype, making the perceived link between appearance and personality larger than the actual link

In short, attractive people are perceived as having far better personalities even when that isn't the case.

Indeed, people seem to assume that positive interpersonal qualities and physical attractiveness are systematically linked (i.e., a “halo effect”) (Andreoni & Petrie 2008; Callan, Powell, & Ellard, 2007; Smith, McIntosh, & Bazzini, 1999).



Off topic personal note:

It’s not that incels have bad personalities, they are perceived as such because of their looks. Now you’ll say that we possess misogynistic and violent attitudes but ask yourself, was this behavior preempted by the way we were treated or did we grow towards it?


Now to the final closure of this particular study.

In general, results are in line with the ‘beauty is good’ effect (Dion et al., 1972), as people seem to believe that physical attractiveness implies positive personality traits, but the effects of attractiveness are different for men and women.

The results came in as predicted, with the exception that there were differences for men and women. Attractive men were perceived as more extroverted and open minded than attractive women, creating an advantage for attractive men.

In other words, it’s better to be an attractive man than to be an attractive woman.

For Extraversion the effect of attractiveness is the same for women and men but is stronger for male targets. Attractiveness has a positive effect on Conscientiousness only for women whereas it increases Openness only for men.

Thus, overall the “beauty is good effect” seems to be greater for men.

I will not go too deep in the status aspect because it was stated as rather controversial.

source for the cursive text: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873083/


Female nature
____
Excellent genes or providing ability
____
The covering of personality serves as a foundation to grasp in a clearer manner for what I am going to say next. Now, what does a woman want when looking for a mate?

Let's look at this from an evolutionary perspective.
____
Physical attractiveness and especially masculinity indicate good genetic quality, which is important for healthy offspring while ability to provide amplifies the survival rate of offspring because it needs sufficient resources to survive as well(2).

The reason why masculinity plays an enormous role in the mating choices of the human female, is because masculinity in itself greatly enhances physical attractiveness. However, a female's desire for strong masculine features may be influenced depending on whether she wants a long term relationship or a short term one on which I'll come back later.

From an evolutionary view, extremes of secondary sexual characteristics (more feminine for women, more masculine for men) are proposed to be attractive because they advertise the quality of an individual in terms of heritable benefits; they indicate that the owners of such characteristics possess good genes. In other words, such traits advertise the possession of genes that are beneficial to offspring inheriting them in terms of survival or reproduction

Females may choose less masculine faces in some cases (for LTR) because they will often associate masculinity with infidelity, masculine men will not be perceived as good long term partners(3). A woman needs a loyal provider to raise offspring. Masculine men are still preferred for copulation however, because they possess the best genes to pass on.

Increasing the masculinity of face shape increased perceptions of dominance, masculinity and age but decreased perceptions of warmth, emotionality, honesty, cooperativeness and quality as a parent.



YOUR PERSONALITY IS ASSESSED THROUGH YOUR FACE

This may be well and good, but women want men who possess certain personality traits too. Someone who they can form an emotional connection with is what they claim. Funnily enough, the way your personality is judged is through your face. You will not be liked for your personality but in fact for your face. People do not care for who you are but what you look like. As you already know: “The better your face, the better your so called personality”.

Personality traits are reported cross-culturally to be among the most important factors in partner choice by both sexes [1,118]. If desired personality is so important, it would appear likely that personality attributions elicited by a face would affect its attractiveness. For example, women who value cooperation and good parenting may avoid masculine-faced men. Thus, instead of feminine faces being attractive and this attractiveness driving positive personality attributions, it may be that the personality attributions are driving the attractiveness judgements.

They are essentialy saying that your personality equals your face. Personality = Face

The meme is confirmed true.

One study has indeed demonstrated that a desire for some personality traits influences judgements of facial attractiveness [121]. Individuals valuing particular personality traits find faces appearing to display these traits attractive.

Even when it’s not related at all, if your face looks like a certain desired personality it will be attractive to the person who desires that personality.

Being aware of this prospect makes women pickier than thought before. At first women emphasizing the importance of personality made them seem much less shallow since anyone, regardless of looks can possess a certain personality. Now it is not really a certain personality they are desiring, but a certain face that looks like that personality.

Thus, desired personality influences perceptions of facial attractiveness in opposite sex faces, changing the result to: ‘what is good is beautiful’ [121].

source for the cursive text: : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130383/



THE INFLUENCE OF THE MENSTRUAL CYCLE

It's possible one could be thinking that none of this poses an actual problem because different women want different personalities, thus different faces. Following from that, most men should still have a shot.

Things are a little trickier than that, unfortunately.

During ovulation, when a woman is most fertile and the best moment for impregnation; her desires for masculine features increase significantly and so her chances for cheating in her quest for a sexy masculine man(4).

Women prefer the smell of dominant males, more masculine male faces and men behaving more dominantly when at peak fertility than at other times in their menstrual cycle.

That’s not at all, during peak fertility they also prefer more masculine bodies and more masculine voices.

The perfect strategy for a female is to be impregnated by a masculine dominant man and be provided by less masculine more loyal and less dominant men.

Cyclic preferences could influence women to select partners when most likely to become pregnant that possess traits that may be most likely to maximize their offspring's quality via attraction to masculinity or serve to help acquire investment via attraction to femininity.

source for the cursive text: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0018506X07000360

For reference, from masculine to less masculine.

If you understand this, it’s far easier grasp how it comes that 8000 years ago when there was no civilization; 1 man used to reproduce for 17 women. I can only hypothesize the female copulated with the dominant masculine males while being provided by ignorant less masculine men(5).

Final conclusion:
____
You are not desired for your personality as man. You are desired for your looks, genes or ability to provide.

Fun addition:

It's been posted here some times before, but just to be sure.

http://www.webtoons.com/en/drama/lookism/list?title_no=1049

Black pilled fun to read manhwa.

ElliotsSecondAscent, /r/incels 6 Comments [6/27/2017 4:06:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 128545



Anonymous, Whisper 7 Comments [6/26/2017 9:24:27 PM]
Fundie Index: -1
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 128523

A video on how to spot a trannies
https://youtu.be/zq7zebz4E1Y

Jeremiah Weeps, youtube 5 Comments [6/25/2017 11:16:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: ,P E.T.S

Quote# 128521



Atavisionary, Twitter 9 Comments [6/25/2017 11:16:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 128520

[For the uninitiated, autism (including the low-functioning variety) is associated with high synaptic densities, so deriving intelligence from synapse count is fundamentally dubious]



Atavisionary, Twitter 6 Comments [6/25/2017 11:16:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 128510

A video about women in the workforce
https://youtu.be/MNURDy_uGu8

Davis M.J. Aurini, youtube 3 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: P.E.T.S

Quote# 128506

The illusion of female equality exists due to their cocksleeves

Females are the inferior gender and they would be treated inferior to men if it wasn’t for their meat holes. They are inferior in every way. They are only better at being cock sleeves. Their main value is in that. The only thing they have over men is that. The only thing that makes them get equal or better treatment are their cock sleeves but make no mistake. They are below us. Since their sleeves are denied to us they have no value or worth to incels. Females are inferior. They need a gynocentric society and movements to stack everything in their favor to appear equal. If you think of females as equals you are already cucked. Why can they get away with this? Why does this illusion work and nobody does or says anything? It’s because of their cocksleeves. If female sexual resources wouldn’t be so overvalued or if they didn’t have vaginas would they be treated equally to men? The answer is no. They don’t sleep with lesser men to keep sex overvalued to keep their power and monopoly going. The only reason they get somewhat equal treatment is due to their cocksleeves. They appear somewhat equal to beta morons due to their cocksleeves. Their only value is as an object. Females always were objects and always will be objects. Females consciously or subconsciously like being objects because they get equal treatment out of it. Lesser men are getting played if they believe any of these illusions. They love being objects to chad but not lesser men that’s why we are all here.

Canino1997, R/incels 14 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 128505

Rape is taking back power from females and stopping female entitlement

Even the option of prostitution is female entitlement. Incels that go to a prostitute are enablers. The most common way a female has power over a man is with their vagina. Females cling on to that power with everything they have. They are monopolizing sex. Females are monopolizing sex because deep down they know that they are objects and that they have no other advantages over men. Having a vagina is their default value. If you go to a prostitute you are engraving your subhuman ness. You say that no female would touch my genitals unless I pay her. You are accepting defeat. The females win if we go to a prostitute. They will successfully have power over you if you go to a prostitute. You will be a part of their monopoly they have on sex. This is why rape is such a big problem. The act of rape takes away their power. They feel powerless while being raped because they lose their power over lesser men if they get raped by lesser men. This is why rape is considered such a big crime. Females convinced the world that rape is such a big crime just to keep their power. They have convinced the world that rape is a crime just to be able to play out their sick monopoly they have on sex without repercussions. This sick monopoly they have on sex is the reason why we incels suffer. Men are being driven to prostitutes out of desperation that other females are responsible for. Prostitution is not an option for most of us because of that. Prostitution is accepting defeat and becoming part of their sick monopoly. Prostitution is giving power to females. Rape is taking power away from them. Females have the power in the sexual marketplace by default. They can try to go for chad. Men don’t have that kinda power if a 4/10 male would go for a 9/10 female she would say no and everybody would laugh at him. In the reverse case, chad is more likely to say yes. This is where the common incel belief that chad is taking away all girls come from. Every female has power over lesser man because of the double standard in dating and female entitlement. I want to eliminate that double standard. The legalization of rape would even the odds and end the sick female monopoly they have on sex.


Canino1997, R/incels 4 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 128504

Electroshock Collars to stop female entitlement

Electroshock Collars to stop female entitlement. After the female child is 4 she will have to get an electroshock collar around her neck. They will never take the collar off even when she gets married. Just the control of the collar will change from male parent to the husband if she leaves the house and gets married. Every time the female tries to take entitlement or behaves entitled the male presses the button and she will get shocked. If she talks about feminism or anything remotely entitled she will get shocked. It is possible to condition people with electro shocks. This will stop female degeneracy and entitlement. Their evil nature will be suppressed this way and the world will become a fairer place without female entitlement. This will solve inceldom indirectly. The world will be a better place in the long run. The horrors of the sexual revolution and feminism will be rolled back. Females will know their place again. Growing up they will be conditioned to be submissive and they will know their place. They will not be tainted by feminism or entitlement.

Canino1997, R/incels 19 Comments [6/25/2017 11:14:03 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 128503

It should be legal for incels to rape females if they use protection and the female is unconscious

Inceldom is a deprivation of a basic human need. If an incel does rape an unconscious female with protection, the female wouldn’t even know that she was raped. Even if she found out it wouldn’t be that bad. No violence or anything would be used against the female because she would be unconscious. She wouldn’t even remember it. Rape to a female would do way less harm than inceldom does to a man. Overall suffering would be reduced. If a man is an incel long enough to rape a female, then he is the victim, not the villain. No starving man should have to go to prison for stealing food, and no sexually starved man should have to go to prison for raping a female. Without food, the body of a man dies. Without sex, the soul and mind of a man will die. If a man is an incel long enough he will end up going insane sooner or later. This way the females would not remember or know that they were raped. Men would be able to keep their sanity and the suffering of us incels would be ended. In my opinion, it should be legal for incels to rape unconscious females if they use protection to create a better world with no suffering.

Canino1997, R/incels 12 Comments [6/25/2017 11:13:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 128496

About 15 years ago, when I was already in my 30’s, I met a German mother and her 14 year old daughter in London, and they invited me over to Germany to visit them, which I did. I was careful not to so much as kiss the girl on her cheek, even though both were making it clear that I could bang her and expected me too. The girl even started claiming it was making her depressed and I wouldn’t touch her because she was ‘fat’ (she wasn’t – and she was really pretty). Anyway, they actually fell out with me because of it. The regrettable irony is, I was unaware that it would have been entirely legal for me at the time to have had sex with the girl. It only became ‘illegal’ when Jacquie ‘pig’ Smith closed the ‘loophole’ when she was Labour Home Secretary (the same Jacqui Smith who was forced to resign because of corruption).

theantifeminist, Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights 5 Comments [6/25/2017 12:52:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 128491

i don’t like…….being a woman….. around men and men thinking that they can talk to me or look at me

gonegal, Tumblr 4 Comments [6/25/2017 6:19:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128482

[When you claim to be a top-tier womanizer but have absolutely shit taste]

A telling anecdote about the state of America’s girls and women:

" In 15 years as a BSA leader I never heard dads speak so proudly as when saying that their daughters were tomboys."

I’ve heard the same thing from dads of daughters. One psychological urge at work here is the desire of fathers who secretly wished for sons to impart their unrequited longings onto their daughters. “Butching up” a daughter is a facsimile, however poor, of having the real thing… a son.

Another reason for this glorification of grrlpower and imputation of male sex roles onto daughters by beta dads is, it must be said, a subconscious kowtowing to the reigning feminist shrikegeist. The culture is so steeped in feminist idiocy and the attendant ugly woman project of training girls to grow up into ballbusting men (and of shaming men to become supplicating nancyboys) that it seems perfectly reasonable and normal for the regular dad on the suburban street to crow about reshaping his daughter into an androgynous weirdo with a penchant for throwing balls… but still like a girl.

If things are to change for the better, a full frontal assault by real-thinking men AND women is needed. The goal is to establish positive feedback loops to fight back the poz before it metastasizes.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 7 Comments [6/25/2017 6:17:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 128481

Yes, and as you say, also because it feels bad calling women out for anything in this culture.

But, at the same time, many of these guys *want* their daughters to be this way. They *prefer* daughters who have moxie, are sassy, push around boys and take no prisoners, and are focused on their own achievement. If they didn’t want this for their daughters, they wouldn’t mostly bend over backwards to make their daughters like this in countless ways while they are raising them. The pushy, moxie’d, un-feminine young women didn’t materialize from the ether, they were raised to be that way, and mostly with the full cooperation and enthusiastic support of their fathers.

That’s a big part of the “weak men are screwing things up” mindset — they *want* their daughters to be like this, and therefore they want the boys to be even stronger. The idea appears to be a marriage of super heroes — wonder woman can only have Superman as a husband, because no mere mortal man can handle wonder woman, so the problem is that most guys are weak because they aren’t Superman for my daughter’s wonder woman. This is the mindset. As men, we need to hold the fathers of these young women to account for what they are doing to the culture, and their critical role in the cultural destruction and outright vandalism that is taking place.

Novaseeker, Dalrock 3 Comments [6/25/2017 6:17:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 128480

The sphere consensus is that female hypergamy leads to polygamy. A couple stays together only until the infant is up on its feet and can move around. 80% of women pursue 20% of men…

If 1:1 pairing up was natural, then the average man would have no trouble getting and keeping the average woman even now..

I separately contend that the condition of poverty that existed for 99.9% of human existence buried a lot of these female traits. Modern prosperity, ironically, has elevated women into a Peter Principle of civilizational uselessness….

Of course, an article at Heartiste exhibits that which I have been saying for years :
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/06/24/comment-of-the-week-women-are-anti-civilizational/

The diametric opposition between unrestricted female nature and the core pillars that any successful, prosperous, and free society is built on is worthy of profound and punctilious study.

Anon, Dalrock 6 Comments [6/25/2017 6:17:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 128478

Everyone is supposed to get a degree, but it is especially important for women and minorities to get them. Currently, this bubble consists of 1.3 trillion dollars in debt and rising. Propaganda is also mainly focused on taking advantage of the demographics who, with less innate critical faculties, are least likely to get through the system unharmed. As much as low-IQ minorities and women get on my nerves, I do not approve of those taking advantage of their deficits for personal gain.

...

One thing I would like to point out about this interaction is the sex of the two interviewees. While right leaning women and left leaning men are common enough as to not be remarkable, it is worth remembering that there are somewhat strong sex differences in political attitudes, among other things, over the population. Men more naturally fall into right-wing and/or libertarian positions whereas women more often fall into progressive, paternalistic, and big government positions. Evolutionary psychology suggests that women have preferences for paternalistic, big government because in the ancestral environment lack of security was almost always their biggest trouble. They had to rely on males almost entirely for physical security and also had to depend substantially on males for resource security (i.e. food). Given any say in how society is structured, women will tend to choose arrangements which appear to provide that security regardless of circumstance. This pattern is observable by looking at the increases in government spending in various jurisdictions immediately after women’s suffrage was approved. A number of US states enacted women’s voting at different times prior to the 19th amendment and in every instance taxes and expenditures increased substantially.

...

Proof enough that attractive women like our bimbo are best seen and not heard.

However, physical and resource security doesn’t just arise out of the ether. It has to come from somewhere and has to be paid for by someone. As usual, it is men who had to bear this increased burden. This resource transfer is largely equivalent to state-enforced cuckoldry so as the level of this burden increases so does the number of men who opt-out of the system entirely. This explains to some extent why more men tend towards less government and less taxes. It isn’t that men don’t value security, its that they know the costs of ensuring the security of the incompetent will disproportionately fall on them and thus lower their own prosperity and happiness. It also ultimately lowers evolutionary fitness for the successful which many may be able to sense at some level.

While it is useful to be aware of possible evolutionary explanations for the poor political choices of women, that doesn’t mean directly perceived advantages should be ignored (or be considered mutually exclusive). As I mentioned in a recent article, women tend to incur more debt to get a degree (and in general), and more often choose degrees which are less likely to confer employable skills:

...

With this pattern of economic and educational foolishness, it is not hard to understand why many women favor more wealth transfers with respect to student loans. More wealth transfers here softens or eliminates the financial costs of poor decisions on the part of the poor little ladies. It is hardly surprising when a group of people selfishly vote in their own interests regardless of the costs to others or society as a whole. However, as I have mentioned before more than once, this only works in the short term. Eventually the guys figure out the scam and once the game is up they withhold their resources as much as possible, which can turn out to be quite a bit. The ironic result of these policies that ostensibly increase female well-being is that there will be substantially less resource and physical security for everyone.

As a closing note, I do agree that to a substantial extent it is quite unfair to dupe naive kids into taking on massive amounts of non-dischargable debt for the often worthless product that is today’s university degree. Especially for women who can’t really be expected to have the same level of critical thinking skills as men for biological reasons. If these loans are to be forgiven, I think the best way to handle the cost is to take as much of the money as possible from selling off the property and endowments of the universities. Considering the holdings of universities this could easily be worth tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars. Since the universities were the ones actively encouraging this fraud, they should be the ones expected to make things right. Not to mention this would largely destroy the institutions most responsible for propagating the far-left narratives destroying our civilization. No reason not to kill two birds with one stone.

Atavisionary, Atavisionary 2 Comments [6/25/2017 6:16:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 128473

What kind of -cel are you?

MarriedAndLookin4Fun:
I'm:
* Gymcel
* Suicel
* Acnecel
* Narcissist-cel

ppdthrowawa:
Gymcel, heightcel, ethnikcel, bignosecel

throwawayfreak44:
* bloatcel
* doublechincel
* skinnycel
* gymcel
* weirdcel
* sickcel
* degeneratecel
* poorcel
* scumcel
* subhumancel

dont_count_on_me:
* Workcel
* Baldcel
* Uglycel
* shortcel
* Copecel

TheEngineer19:
* Uglycel
* Autismcel
* Heightcel (5'6")
* Jawcel
* Chincel
* Teethcel (Teeth are wonky)
* Acnecel
* Framecel

GeneticSewage
framecel, recessed chincel, negative canthal tiltcel, lowiqcel, scleral showcel, severe acnecel, presbyopiacel, latepubertycel, needtoenditcel

Assorted incels, r/incels 16 Comments [6/25/2017 6:15:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128472

Two types of love an FHO can give

Motherly love and romantic love
That's it.. If she isn't your mother and doesn't want to fuck you she wishes you were dead

NewLoadsOfFun, r/incels 6 Comments [6/25/2017 6:15:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 128464

COTW winner Jack Ragnar does a 180 on cuckventional wisdom and as a result grazes a deep and abiding truth about the sexes.

" I had a conversation about flirting with my sister. This came up. Women at their core want to find out who the better man is. They would by default go with the winner of “you and him fight”. However men are not all on board with this idea. Such games are anti-civilization, and the costs are high. If men refuse, and choose to work out their differences in a more civilized and subtle way, women have to gain the information about men in a more covert fashion. So we get shit-tests, status seeking, etc.

Women are literally anti-civilizational. Their instincts if left unchecked (ala modern women), will bring out the most violent aspects of men. Men despite their capability for violence and destruction are not on average destructive. Women, if left to their devices would have us living in grass huts."

The white kight/cuck aphorism they love to cling to is that women are the civilizers of men, by dint of being the gatekeepers to sex and therefore having the leverage to demand men behave themselves.

But what if the civilizing force runs the other way? Any man who has experience with women has seen that the fair sex can entertain malice and destructiveness the equal of any man, but without the sensationalist physical violence that grabs headlines and puts the spotlight on male wickedness. There’s a better case to make that men are the sex with the drive to civilize, and that women, constrained as their sex is by the hypergamous need to identify the strongest man in the tribe, exert de-civilizing forces on the sexual market that if left unregulated can and do lead to cultural collapse.

Jack is onto something yuge, and we here at CH have toyed with the same idea of unrestricted female sexuality as a herald of national decline. The entire story may be more nuanced than this, but it’s a necessary and useful widening of the discourse to at least begin to cast suspicion on the shibboleth that women civilize men and not the other way around. When all is said and done, CH will have pushed open the Ovaton Window so wide the sunlight will scorch dying feminist wombs from Berkeley to Bonn.

CH & Jack Ragnar, Chateau Heartiste 2 Comments [6/25/2017 6:12:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
1 2 3 4 5 7 | top