1 2 3 4 | bottom
Quote# 140542

The Jews made up that 5h1t about the world being controlled by a bloke who lives somewhere up in the sky and them being that bloke's chosen people (magical thinking + narcissism). The Jews made that ridiculous decision to completely ignore the fact that human beings are one of the most highly territorial species on the planet, spread themselves across an alien continent (Europe) infiltrating other peoples' territories in their millions without a by your leave, and when the inevitable backlash occurred (which they refer to as the 'holocaust'), instead of admitting they'd made a mistake, explained it by inventing a fictitious illness called 'antisemitism'.

Habitually making things up and refusing to accept responsibility for the consequences of one's own mistakes are traits that are usually associated with psychopaths. Jews mutilate their baby sons' penises. They have an irrational fear of eating pork. It's blatantly obvious that the Jews are a tribe of mentally ill people. It's so F'ing obvious, I can't believe it isn't more widely acknowledged.

The existence in the world of a tribe of mentally ill people doesn't have to be a problem. It's only a problem if you allow them to infiltrate your civilisation, take it over then set about destroying it. That's exactly what we've allowed them to do. I'll never understand why. Pandering to mentally ill people isn't an act of kindness, it's an act of cruelty. When Jews first started trying to infiltrate European countries, kind and compassionate European leaders would have said 'No, we're not letting you infiltrate our territory. If we do that, it's guaranteed to end badly for you'.

Of course, that isn't what happened. That tribe of mentally ill people were given enough rope to hang themselves. They made good use of it. Anyone agree/disagree with this analysis? I welcome feedback on my posts, in agreement or otherwise.

Bulldog789, Stormfront 2 Comments [9/20/2018 2:38:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140540

FYI, Creepy Joe Biden is now calling Trump supporters “dregs of society“. A bit more bite to it than thecunt’s “deplorables”, but the intended message is the same: “we don’t reason with those we consider our inferiors”. These are fighting words, dripping with dehumanizing bile. When the elites use terms like this to describe regular working stiff Americans, it is proof their hearts are blackened and they would laugh if you were killed, your children raped, and everything you hold dear reduced to ashes.

How would you compromise in good faith with enemies like that? You wouldn’t. The time for op-eds and lecterns and agitprop would end and give way to the clarifying battlefield.

...

The key will be just how disloyal White women are to their White men, which is equivalent to asking how disloyal White women will be to their nation, for a nation is the sum total of men’s collective purpose and ambition, and America is the sum total of White men’s collective vision.

If our women embrace pussyhat careerist shrike catladydom, their loyalty will evaporate, and America’s end is fated. If somehow they return to the fold, it buys their men time to rescue America from an Abattoir of Babel demise.

I thought Trump would buy us that time, and he still may, but with each day and each new low the Media-Deep State-Democortez Axis of Annihilation plumb my doubt grows that Trump can prevail. He has done much; it may not be enough. From where I stand, I don’t see White shitlibs coming around to reason any time soon, maybe not even when the rivers of blood flow. I see flickers of hope, of delayed realization from a few, but they won’t make the difference. We need an awakening that shakes the foundations of our institutions, rends post-WW2 orthodoxy, and shatters the neoliberal belief in Globohomo.

Pray for it, because what will emerge from a thwarted awakening is the stuff of nightmares.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 3 Comments [9/20/2018 2:35:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 140526

Africans only respect ONE thing: A loaded gun in their face. I speak from experience as I tend to work in african countries regularly.
If you have africans in your country and are unarmed they see no reason to give you any respect.

Bloodmane1987, YouTube 0 Comments [9/20/2018 2:22:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Sikan

Quote# 140514

[OP of thread "WE WILL NEVER FORGET 9-11-18 ~ The Night of The Long Noses"]



Picture depting the World Trade Center where each building is named after subreddits baned for hate speech, such as ChadRight and BillionShekelSupreme.

engine_town_rattler, Reddit. - r/fragilejewishredditor 3 Comments [9/20/2018 2:16:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 140503

Sara Gibbs: So we are now in a position where antisemitism is endorsed & endemic on the right & the left, where those pointing it out are demonised, dehumanised & accused of being part of some sinister conspiracy, & most ordinary people don’t care. History tells us what happens next.

Being Jewish has always been a background rumble for me. A nice, but not front & centre, part of the mosaic of who I am. I’ve always felt English first & foremost. Now I feel othered in my own country. I have never felt so unwelcome.

Rex Oper: So when r u leaving? Can arrange a whip around for one way economy class to TLV.



Rex Oper, Twitter  0 Comments [9/20/2018 2:12:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 140497

A fervent supporter of Jeremy Corbyn has been kicked out of the teaching profession for declaring ‘every sane human is anti-Semitic’.

Harpreet Singh ranted on Facebook that Israel should be ‘wiped off the planet’ and ‘of course we hate Jews’. Of the Labour leader he wrote: ‘God bless Jeremy Corbyn. He is a modern day saint. And I mean it. If one of your loved ones was at the mercy of Israel, you would feel his morality, his conviction & his commitment to The Truth’.

The 48-year-old, a former head of maths at Sandye Place Academy in Bedfordshire, was suspended from his job after colleagues reported him. He was banned from teaching anywhere in England by the Teaching Regulation Agency after being found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct over the ‘offensive/racist comments’.

Harpreet Singh, Mail on Sunday via Twitter  1 Comments [9/18/2018 2:59:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 140496

I don’t ever want to deal with non whites on any level, any more than I absolutely have to. If I worked, and worked around them, I’d be polite and speak as little as possible. I actively avoid them in real life. I want nothing to do with them. I don’t care how they feel, I don’t care what they think or want, or what they think about me. I don’t care about them and I never will.

Dr. Dew D. Ball, PhD, Disqus 3 Comments [9/18/2018 2:58:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140492

Re: Why are many Jews pro-gay marriage?

The reason is that if corruption spreads amongst the gentiles, the curse of God will be upon them and they will be worthy of destruction, something positive for the religious ones among the jews. They hate it amongst themselves though, and while they've always had this mentality, they never spread corruption save that it surfaces the most within themselves first and foremost above everyone else.

Second, when populations are rotten to the core, they are ripe for manipulating and taking control of. You see that is what has happened in the USA, before when it was a more religious society, they had more control over their affairs. After they took advantage of the civil rights movement and left blacks in the dust, you now see the country is dominated by interest, its populace are all economic slaves, and moral corruption is very widespread in their society such that even basic systems like family are completely fallen apart. Who is ultimately benefiting and pocketing all the wealth? Banks. And who owns them? Israel, in the end, the treasure cave where all that money/weaponry is stashed.

Ali, Ummah 3 Comments [9/18/2018 2:57:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140484

We want whiteness banished to history—to an other-space of that which is unknown and impossible. There is no way in which whiteness can move that is freeing or liberating for Black people, so there is no way for white people to free or liberate.

Whiteness is indivisible from white people. To identify as white is to claim the social structure of whiteness, is to always wade in the waters of anti-Blackness. Sociologist Anthony Giddens criticizes our general conceptualization of social structure for having “a tendency to view structure and symbols as somehow alien to the actors who produce, reproduce, and transform these structures and symbols” (The Structure of Sociological Theory, Turner 1991: 523). It is this tendency that so easily clouds our understanding of whiteness and motivates us to embrace white allyship. Black liberation would mean the destruction of whiteness, but whiteness is upheld by all white people. White people cannot escape upholding it.

Constitutive of progressive white people and spaces has always been the question; “How can I, as a white person, work affirmatively in the struggle for Black liberation?” People have engaged this question as a genuine possibility throughout history; of there being a way, however not-yet-understood, for white people to do whiteness well, and, in doing so, aid Black people in getting free. But on a very real level, Black liberation would radically necessitate the refusal of anyone knowing themselves as white. It would mean the actual end of white selves, including the well-meaning white selves seeking the answer to how they can address racism. Black liberation means that white people can only destroy their own whiteness or be destroyed with it. White people cannot exist as white and do anything to address racism, because whiteness in action is racism.

But as much as this argument is a stance against whiteness, it is also a deep affirmation of the totality of Blackness; a declaration that Blackness is enough. More than considering the place or non-place of whiteness, we are concerned with the dream-work of Black folks, that reflexive work we do and have always done trying to better know how to love and be with and in community with ourselves and each other. That work has forever been Black, has never needed whiteness, has best succeeded when we refused whiteness.

There is no answer to the question of what white people can do for Black liberation, but racism veils reality so easily and efficiently. It is anti-reality. It makes the impossible seem not only possible, but a worthwhile endeavor. It truly does keep you, as Toni Morrison said, “from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and over again.”

The dilemma of what white people should do to address racism has the same exhausting function of racism, because this dilemma is racism. Because for white people “to do” anything means that whiteness must be centered in a way that would perpetuate its oppressive essentiality.

There is nothing redeeming or redeemable about whiteness—by definition. Only the radical negation of it is helpful or freeing. And it is not enough for us as Black people to encourage or allow white people to try their hand at addressing racism. It is necessary instead to adopt a politic of exclusion. This is to build upon Malcolm X’s claim in The Autobiography of Malcolm X that “Where the really sincere white people have got to do their ‘proving’ of themselves is not among the black victims, but out on the battle lines of where America’s racism really is,” (X, Haley 1964: 383–384) with the vital understanding that Black victims exist everywhere whiteness does.

Therefore, white people should move comfortably in neither Black spaces nor white spaces. Even those who are well-meaning should drive themselves into the ground trying to figure out how to occupy a positive whiteness—because it is impossible. Only in this frenzy, when the sense of order that is critical to whiteness turns to chaos in every place, can the motivation to destroy it overcome the compulsion to reform it.

Contending that whiteness has no value or role in the struggle for Black liberation is an immense claim, but it is a necessary one if we are to be free. The sooner we take seriously that Black people are the best articulators, dreamers and fighters for the future in which we are liberated, the closer we are to the manifestation of freedom. Important to remember is what is made possible for Black people, is made possible for all people. There is no need to consider how whiteness can operate in this. It can’t. It shouldn’t. It won’t in any future in which we are free.

The question of “doing whiteness well” is a question which centers a discussion about Black liberation on the actions of white people. We know that white people maintain hegemonic presences in all institutional forms of power. So, to have a conversation about white people working for Black liberation is to have a conversation predicated on the need for white people to wield institutional power and influence to help Black people. In this context, white people maintain systemic power, and Black people are the recipients of their benevolence. That white people might maintain power in shaping and dreaming up Black liberation is counterrevolutionary. Black liberation must always center on the assault against and defiance of these institutions. “We do not negotiate with terrorists.”1)

Indeed, when we’ve seen white people try to do whiteness well, try to operate their spheres of power and influence well, we’ve also seen the martyrdom of Black women murdered by police to bring white people to reckon with their sins. We’ve seen white men starting campaigns professing the beauty of Black women, only to soon after realize it came hand in hand with the violent claiming of and sense of entitlement to Blackness and Black bodies.

This is all to say, importantly, that whiteness cannot be done well, cannot be done without violence or without being in opposition to Blackness and Black freedom. But the extent of this lies far beyond ashy campaigns and disturbing open letters begging other white people to atone for their sins using the blood of Black women. We must critically engage the possibility that whiteness is only violent to Blackness, is only and can only ever be antithetical to Black liberation.

That we conceptualize whiteness as having a positive operation in the fight for Black liberation is perhaps the single greatest success of the normative functions of a colonialist State. That is to say, we have been successfully hoodwinked to believe that which harms us most vitally might also be able to save us.

“Rather than emerging from a scientific perspective, the notion, ‘race,’ is informed by historical, social, cultural, and political values,” writes Teresa J. Guess in The Social Construction of Whiteness: Racism by Intent, Racism by Consequence, “thus… the concept ‘race’ is based on socially constructed, but socially, and certainly scientifically, outmoded beliefs about the inherent superiority and inferiority of groups based on racial distinctions.” What this means is that race is designed as a hierarchal structure, and whiteness is constructed for no other purpose than to occupy the space of racial superiority. Therefore, to exist and act as white is to reinforce the dominance of whiteness.

Indeed, there would be no white race, no “race” as we know it, if whiteness weren’t positioned in violent dominion. That is the only thing it can do. Whiteness cannot operate in any way that does not first perpetuate white supremacy.

This, of course, is not to say that white people have not been the conduits for necessary Black liberation work. White people surely played integral roles in the freedom rides, abolition movement and the Civil Rights movement. But those roles were meticulously crafted by the toils, lives, death and suffering of Black people. The energy forced through those conduits was painstakingly produced by Black folks. To credit it as anything else is to fall prey to the same tempting veil of racism that motivates us to seek the impossible from our white allies. White people playing a role in liberation work are always merely actors, and the work done with them always done entirely in spite of their whiteness, not because of it.

All ways of addressing Black liberation for which white people are praised is always work Black people—Black poor and working class women, trans, non-binary, disabled and queer people especially—have already done and been doing and have made possible for white people to know.

Even John Brown, the white abolitionist who was executed in 1859 after leading an insurrection against pro-slavery forces, furthered the legacy of the likes of Nat Turner and other Black folks who fought and died for their own freedom before him. We must be sure in recognizing that dying for freedom did not begin with Brown, was not his legacy to create. Though perhaps in death, in a significant sacrifice of self, he and those like him have shed light on what it could mean to give up whiteness for good. When whiteness is so seeped into your being, might giving it up necessitate a threat to one’s safety and existence?

And where do white people exist in safety? In settler colonial societies, positions of power are designated and protected for whiteness. Perhaps the only action white folks can take—barring physical disappearance—in the struggle for Black liberation, for them to successfully put an end to their own whiteness, is the absolute absolving of their places and power. Their literal disappearance from the State and its institutions. It is worth exploring what this would mean for the the persistence of capitalism and the State. Is demanding the destruction of whiteness from the State to demand the destruction of the State, which was created by and has only ever known itself in service to (and in tandem with) whiteness? Which, each together, have only ever worked to maintain capitalism, anti-Blackness, and the disappearance of Indigenous people?

As John Stanfield writes in Theoretical and Ideological Barriers to the Study of Race-Making, “Racism and race-making are part and parcel of the manner by which major industrial, European-descent nation states such as the United States have originated and developed” (Stanfield 1985:161-162). This is how capitalism, anti-Indigeneity and anti-Black racism are intrinsically tied. None can exist in any way that is good for Black people. The presence of each is specifically predicated on Black subjugation.

After whiteness is obliterated, at that point, what the people who now identify as white should do is a giant theoretical exercise: what comes after whiteness? How does someone become not white? That is the legitimate and critical work of many. But our focus is always on Black folks figuring out new and better ways to get free—independent of white people and capitalism and the entirety of western empires. We are confident that our dreamings of freedom can crumble whiteness, capitalism and empire without giving deep consideration to the question of “what do we do with it”. We’re only interested in the work of building past it.

Kevin Rigby Jr. and Hari Ziyad are Black, queer, non-binary dreamers who, in some reality not yet here, are married, gendered or ungendered without colonial restriction, and free.

Kevin Rigby Jr. and Hari Ziyad, RaceBaitR 7 Comments [9/18/2018 2:51:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 140481

Shades of (white) privilege: a sociologist compares the experiences of Swedish female expats in America and Singapore

(Jorggo)
We know this already but it helps to have it written in paper for people who still deny white privilege doesn't exist.

Also, something I found problematic in the article highlights one of the key issues that relates to WMAF/dating.

The article states that Swedish women didn't enjoy a premium for their whiteness in Singapore like they did in America and were considered to be below Chinese women. This tells me that Asian men in Singapore don't put white women above Asian women. That seems to be reciprocated by the Swedish women as well. "They showed the least bit interest in the Asian men and in fact they felt less feminine".

However, the opposite was true for the Swedish men and the Chinese women. It's interesting that even when unintended, the issue of WMAF still manages to pop its head in.

White women seem to feel more masculine in Asia and I feel this may also translate to them feeling more masculine around Asian men because they see how "feminine" Asian women are so of course it's only plausible for them to think that they're more masculine in comparison.

I always thought it was weird whenever I saw white women in Asia, they would 9.9/10 be with white men but not the same for the white men. Granted I couldn't verbalize it at the time but it still made a disconnect in my brain.

I don't really have a point to make here just that I never took into account that XFs may be dissuaded from pursuing AMs because they feel more masculine which probably makes our already dire situation worse.

(ferdyberdy)
I could never date white women. I found the few that I associated and went out with to be very indulgent, impractical, only had short term goals and almost always gave in to their emotions.

Yes which is what caused you to make the broad conclusion you led with. It’s a bit hypocritical to do that when we experience the same broad brushing.


What broad strokes/conclusion mate? I referred everything to specifically "the few that I associated and went out with" and because of that "I could never date white women" <- is that the broad conclusion? that I do not find white women suitable partners?

I'm not going to be dishonest and say I'm ready to try my luck and put up with one more just for internet points.

Here is another broad brushstroke for you. Also, as an Asian can you really honestly say that you find marrying into white culture appealing?

I am married to an Aussie. She and her family is awesome. No gender race or culture is monolithic. Just as I wouldn’t want to be prejudged for my race or culture I don’t do it to others.


Is it prejudice just because I have chosen to make a practical decision on this?

The cultural differences are well documented. I'm not from China but I just put it there because the scores were similar to my country (at least in comparison to Australia).

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/australia,china/

I prefer to marry into a culture that has more long term orientation/planning and less indulgent. Perhaps those traits are awesome (pretty subjective word by the way) to you, but it is not to me.

If its prejudgement to avoid wasting my time by gearing my dating preferences towards a partner and a culture that is more likely to yield qualites that I seek in a partner then guilty as charged.

I never said it applied to all white girle by the way. Just enough to warrant me moving on to avoid wasting my time.

(Your gonna get downvoted becuase alot of chan lurkers around here worship the ground mayo girls walk on.)


I do not blame them if they find such traits attractive. Someone has to at the end of the day and there is a reason why it perpetuates in culture.

I'm not particularly wealthy so I do not have the funds or the time to try my luck with girls who are less likely to value long term stability over immediate gratification. No amount of political correctness will change how frequent each trait is found in either culture.

An interesting insight into white social signalling.

It appears that all they are after is still only validation and relevance. Self-actualization has no value of no one knows about it. Any altruistic endeavours (feminism for example) they appear to support seems just be an effort to fulfil that need for validation and acknowledgement.

(TehInternets)
To most whites "self actualization" is a byword that means travel and taking pictures in 3rd world locations, showing off their minority "friends" or taking part in safe, prescribed activities carefully curated to look prestigious. Contrary to popular belief whites are neither adventurous, free thinking nor individualistic.

None of these activities have anything to do with the "self". White culture is not about feeling but pretending.

The ideal is light-skin but not pink-skin.

Pretty easy to see why white women in Asia do badly. They age faster, they are less feminine, less thin, they are excessively narcissistic and have a superiority complex which I really think is just penis-envy. Blonde nordic women are seen to represent the apex of these traits so they are largely ignored by men.

various commenters, r/aznidentity 1 Comments [9/15/2018 3:56:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 140465

I'm a woman and I'm sliding further right every day.

I was raised in California by a very liberal mother. I was force fed feminism in the 9th grade by a very pushy feminist teacher. I was a Bernie supporter in 2016.
There were several factors that brought me to the right. The first couple were when BLM interrupted Bernie's speech. I saw how weak willed he was and thought to myself "how is this man going to handle adversaries on a global scale when he cowers immediately to the demands of a couple young black women?"

The next was when Gloria Allred insisted that women who do not vote for Hillary are betraying fellow women. She was pushing groupthink - herd mentality that immediately infuriated me. I knew something fishy was going one.
The biggest unfurling of my liberal ideals were the DNC hacks. I read email after email. I saw the immoral consolidation of power against Bernie Sanders and by the end of it I could no longer belong to the DNC. Having a basic understanding of OPSEC, how the internet works, and computers I never once believed in the Muh Russia narrative. It was a leak, not a hack.

The Women's March completely ridded me of my Feminist brain cancer. These adults were throwing child like temper tantrums for absolutely no reason. They looked absolutely retarded in their pussy hats, and everything was very cringe. I just couldn't anymore.

After that, I started to evaluate the type of information I've fallen for my whole life. I started looking into alternative political stances. Just like everyone else I started with the light stuff - Sargon of Akkad, Jordan B Peterson, Steven Crowder and Paul Joseph Watson. But it wasn't enough. They were able to comment on the symptoms of a sick society, but never looked in depth towards the cause. Peterson hinted at it, with Postmodernism and Marxist idealogies being wide spread through out Western Society. But not far enough and I wanted answers.

I tried to avoid the JQ. Really did. But everything always led back to it. I watched the documentary this sub talked about - Defamation. After that the redpill was swallowed and I could no longer go back. I'm currently reading Culture of Critique and all of the sources are sound from what I've found.

I want my people to survive. I want Western Culture to flourish and not die out. We all know there's a decline to the Western World, and I personally think that without it the world will be a darker place. I don't want my future children to be handed such a world.

Brap Sugoi, Reddit 4 Comments [9/14/2018 3:41:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 140462

Some background info: My political ideology has radically shifted since 2016. I used to be a feminist and was a Bernie supporter before Trumps election. Everything started coming into question after after the DNC leaks. I have some knowledge about IA and networking, so it was impossible for me to buy into the Russia narrative. After the Pussy Hat marches after the election, I found that I could no longer call myself a feminist either because the behavior was appalling and I didn't think Trump warranted any of the hatred he was receiving. Fell into the Alt-lite Sargon/Peterson club, and continuously dug until redpilled on the JQ and essentially went full 1488. I don't even think women should be allowed to vote anymore.

My husband has always been a Moderate Republican. He's a great guy, really smart, but he's also very forgiving of people and is the type that just wants to get along. I've been trying to redpill him on various topics - he was receptive of the JQ but seems tired of my jokes. He's definitely more of a Civic Nationalist, and we've had long discussions on Race and IQ and why some cultures are worse than others due to IQ and evolution.

He doesn't buy that IQ is a proper measure of intelligence since culture can influence the outcome of the tests. He still thinks economics are at play when it comes to black vs white violent crime and poverty. He seems to not care very much if humanity becomes a mixed amorphous race, despite me arguing that the West will be dead, and Western culture erased.

He bought heavily into Peterson's Individualist propaganda and I can't convince him that in dire times collectivism is completely necessary.

I've made some ground on these topics but not nearly enough. I don't have enough resources to back up my arguments as I tend to forget to save the studies I stumble upon.

More background: My husband has a really sweet Black Aunt who treated him kindly during a really hard time in his life when nobody else would. He also has mixed cousins. I too really like his aunt, but I'm trying to get across averages of populations and their behaviors don't reflect her own (she genuinely acts really white).
I'm here to ask about what more I can say to convince him that Individualism is only feasible during times of peace and that we need to Collectivize during times of strife. Any resources on Race Realism would be incredibly valuable as well.

Brap_sugoi, Reddit 4 Comments [9/14/2018 3:39:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 140447

Conversely, females of the brown and black species-races can't stop putting out and crapping litters of goblins. Anyway, i think that Jewish population hovers at 2 percent per region, is because this helps to keep the jew network in place, and helps to keep them 'obscure' and seen as 'merely harmless little jew oddkins', while also ensuring that their reach of influence is as global as possible. If jews completely hemmed themselves into one ethnostate, then it could easily be surrounded, and another 'loller cost' would inevitably happen (allegedly). Also, if they remain spread out (and/or also stealth about who is and isn't a jew) then it is likely that, in the event that we whites wake up and defend ourselves as a species-race, then there is less chance of them being entirely rooted out and done away with, both in terms of species-race, and in terms of reach of power and influence.

After all, if one is not able to be readily pegged as a jew by anyone else, but one knows that oneself is a jew anyway, then once the pieces stop falling, the process of infiltration and long-spanning shenanigans can begin, all over again. This allows them to (to a degree) hide out in white or mildly arabic nations, and foist the consequences of their actions onto the host populace (usually whites) within the region. White inborn ideology and nobility is also exploited, and words are arranged to distract and imp-lie what the jew wishes to misconstrue or make happen. The Jew in modern times is a big fan of things like political discourse, psycho-ology, and ed-jew-cation, because with these arcane things, the jew now knows that they can speak spells of implication, and make white people do their bidding, take their blame, and even become geno-suicidal. This now frees up alot of effort on the part of jews, and allows them to think up, and enact even greater vile actions of ruination upon their hated blood enemy, we Whites.

Imagine it from the jewish perspective (viciously disgusting, i know, but, just for a minute ?); you have no morality, no higher purpose other than wanton revenge, and to rule the world right back into the ground it was built on, and suddenly, circa ww1 and ww2, after thousands of years of getting (inexplicably and repeatedly) one-upped, you discover that your enemies Big Magic, also works on him, even more so than you or the brown and black races. Suddenly, with your enemies grimoires of education and development, he is at your complete mercy; make him dance funny, sing your race's songs and poems, and yes, even make him throw himself on his own sword. All it takes, is the right sorts of words, to cast his own spells upon him. What sort of devilish fun would jew-you have, now that your most intractably hated foe, has become your most entertainingly useful newest minion ?

cosmicgirl, Stormfront 0 Comments [9/14/2018 3:24:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140446

The Jews only care about money. Literally. The Jews had Jesus Christ crucified by the Romans. The Jews had no interest in following Jesus Christ. Jesus wasn't interested in money. He was only interested in souls. Getting people saved. The Jews had no interest in being saved.

The Jews love money. The Jews focus 100% on money and power. Just look at the central and international banking system. Now many White People act like money loving Jews. We change that by focusing on the collective. The whole individual liberty, social liberal, and libertarian thing did nothing but turn our race into a bunch of greedy capitalist pigs. We should realize that Christianity is morality and it will help save the White Race. Deo Vindice !

WhiteCSA, Stormfront 0 Comments [9/14/2018 3:09:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140445

Who cares. Superman was never White to begin with. His ancestors came from Krypton, not Europe. He is an illegal alien, quite literally. The whole point of Superman is that White people can't solve their own problems, that they need an alien to come and solve their problems for them. Besides, superman was created by Jews Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster. Superman was specifically created to corrupt White thinking by getting young, impressionable children to worship a superhero of an alien race.

In addition, the idea of a hero with a dual identity, one heroic and one mild mannered, was stolen from Johnston McCulley's character Zorro. Zorro is a true White heroic character. He is also a true Hispanic heroic character (albeit created by an Irishman), as Hispanics were originally White, and some still are.

Nikola Bijeliti, Stormfront 2 Comments [9/14/2018 3:09:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140411

I honestly think it [WW3] would be better at this point. If the choice is between Nazis rising and the left recklessly allowing so many Muslims into the country, it turns out just as well for my gay ass either way. I still have more respect for Nazis than Muslims and their enablers -- at least the Nazis don't hate themselves like the left does.

Buce-Nudo, /r/conservative 3 Comments [9/12/2018 1:45:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: pyro

Quote# 140405

He's a Jew, that's why he's executing the Israelis ethnic cleansing in Palestine territories. God will definitely bring them to naughtiness

KingAlsalam, Twitter 1 Comments [9/12/2018 1:44:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140401

Most people tend to only notice what is pointed and spelled out to them.

When the media is leading people by the nose to believe that Corbyn is this hate-filled racist anti-semite threat to the very existence of Jews... that is what most people will believe. Most people pay little attention to politics until the media thrusts it in front of them and says 'look at this, and think this'.

Nonetheless, I think this still represents the best opportunity to red pill people about how the Jews operate. I don't have much idea about how to reach the masses to spell it out though. Newspaper comments sections are usually moderated pretty tightly on this issue, unsurprisingly.

dirtydog, Stormfront 1 Comments [9/12/2018 1:44:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140400

Once the standard parliamentary and party procedures failed to oust Corbyn, they are now upping it a gear.

I firmly believe this is a coordinated attempt by wealthy and influential Jewish figures to topple Corbyn. Unfortunately they seem to be winning. Corbyn hasn't completely caved into them but hasn't been a rock of resistance either.

Corbyn has the party membership behind him. Providing he surrounds himself with loyal people he could purge the party without too much trouble.

Britannic Nationalist, Stormfront 2 Comments [9/12/2018 1:43:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140399

Serena Williams and Tiger Woods are proof the masses of people will watch any Ape the Jews turn into a Sports prodigy.

When will Whites wake up and boycott this sort of degeneracy?

Heidlerr, Stormfront 4 Comments [9/12/2018 1:43:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140175

Regarding Andrew Gillum, who is black, winning the Democratic nomination in the Florida governor's race

The last thing we need to do is to monkey this up by trying to embrace a socialist agenda with huge tax increases and bankrupting the state.

Ron DeSantis, Yahoo 3 Comments [9/12/2018 1:41:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 140398

‘Not Allowed To Receive African Guests’: Discrimination At Guangzhou Hotels

Juliet Hatanga arrived at the Tokai Hotel ???? in Guangzhou’s Xiaobei ?? neighborhood at around 5 p.m. on July 20. The Ugandan national had traveled to the city from neighboring Foshan and was planning to spend “four or five” nights at the hotel, according to a Ugandan community leader in Guangzhou, who asked to remain anonymous.

Unfortunately, when trying to check in at the hotel, Hatanga was informed by staff at the front desk that Ugandan nationals were no longer allowed to stay in the area’s hotels.

Hatanga — who works as a principal magistrate in her home country — contacted staff at the Uganda Consulate General in Guangzhou, who in turn put her in touch with locally based Ugandan community leaders.

“I picked her up and took her to Starbucks for a coffee and told her to calm down,” one Ugandan community leader, who asked to remain anonymous, told me. “I then called the consul general [of Uganda] and I briefed him on what was happening.”

Hatanga was eventually able to check in to a hotel in Tianhe ??, a Guangzhou district located roughly 10 minutes from Xiaobei.

The rejection of Hatanga’s reservation is being linked by Ugandan community leaders to notices that were posted at numerous hotels and serviced apartments in Yuexiu District ??? in early July. The notifications, while all worded differently, stated that the hotels were not allowed to receive guests from African countries, usually accompanied by apologies “for the inconvenience.”



One notice, posted by Waifiden Apartments ??????? and dated July 6, states the building “will not receive foreign guests from all African countries,” as seen in the image below.



A receptionist at the Tokai Hotel, when visited by reporters on July 29, said that guests from Nigeria and Uganda had been turned away in previous weeks at the request of the police. The hotel staffer assured us that the ban on African guests had been lifted and that “everything is back to normal.”

This, at least, seemed true enough. I visited several other hotels in the area, including Zhong Hai Hotel ???? on Huanshi Zhong Lu ???? and Donfranc Hotel ????? on Luhu Gongyuan ????, and all were now accepting African guests.

But who had ordered the posting of the original notices?

Authorities at the Yuexiu Public Security Bureau told us that no warnings were issued to hotels in the district in regards to African guests. They continued to state that any actions taken against citizens of African nations by Yuexiu hotels were done without the involvement of the bureau.

According to Uganda’s Sunday Monitor newspaper, the situation in Guangzhou has worsened for Ugandans due to “many suspects involved in crime, especially drug trafficking, being found to be holding Ugandan passports.” (The story goes on to state that many foreigners arrested carrying a Ugandan passport are actually Nigerian citizens.)

The Monitor report also claims that many restaurants specializing in African cuisine have been forced to cease operations at the behest of Chinese authorities.

In response to the reports, the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the Republic of Uganda issued a statement denying that hotels were instructed by authorities to reject Ugandans and Nigerians, according to Uganda’s New Vision newspaper.

“The situation that some Africans including Ugandans were refused to check into budget hotels in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China was purely resulted from the self-made decisions of isolated hotels,” reads the statement, as published by New Vision on July 28. “Local government has instructed the involved hotels to stop the improper practices immediately and gave grave criticisms and education to these hotels. At present, there is no hotel in Guangzhou which refuses to accommodate Africans.”

The release goes on to note that officials with the Guangdong government met with the consul generals of both Uganda and Nigeria and that steps have been taken to ensure similar problems do not occur in the future.

When contacted for comment, a staffer at the Uganda Consulate General in Guangzhou said that no one was available to speak on the issue and directed us to the statement issued by the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the Republic of Uganda. Staff at the Consulate General of Nigeria in Guangzhou denied any knowledge of Nigerian citizens being denied accommodation in Guangzhou.

Xiaobei is an area in Guangzhou’s Yuexiu District that is often referred to as “Little Africa” due to the large number of African expats, traders, and travelers that live and work in the neighborhood.

According to statistics released in January by the city’s police bureau, Guangzhou is home to 15,000 Africans — a 25 percent drop from 2009. Many believe this number to be on the low side, though, as it fails to include illegal immigrants and those who overstay their visa, according to Xinhua.

unknown hotel staffers, Supchina 0 Comments [9/11/2018 12:21:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 140392

I am Swiss and I think Jews are Jealous of our country, because we make money, we are strong and we are beautiful and we don't have inbreeding depression. We're the complete package and I have no doubts Israel has several nukes ear-marked for us.?

ZadfrackGlutz Zesozose, YouTube 1 Comments [9/11/2018 11:42:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 140387

[A comment on a video entitled "Heidegger & the Seduction of Fascism"]

4 minutes in and nothing about the seduction of fascism. Just Jews giving their opinion on reality or Heidegger. They just can’t handle that the most influential and brilliant philosopher of our time loved uncle Adolf, which speaks volumes they don’t want to hear, so they obfuscate with solipsism. Communists died protesting, yes, some where students, but most of their organisers where Jews. It’s as if they wished him to be a commie. (((Of course)))?

aristochat3, YouTube 3 Comments [9/10/2018 10:38:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 140374

I do not think we will be fighting marxists, but Individualists. Civic nationlists/gloablists/collectivists vs. ethnic nationalists/collectivists. Marxists will be long gone by then.
The multi-racial civic collectivist actually IS what the marxists tried to achieve. The New World Citizen, a globalistic Übermensch, without racial or national identity, history, heritage and past. A new rootless cosmopolitan class that has no stake in any traditional world view whatsoever. Of course that won't work, just look at brazil. But they advertise it to the leftists as overcoming "race" and racism, by mixing all races, then offering them a common moral framework. There will be those who see racial identity as a value in itself and those who rather believe that race has no value and gather around a common set of abstract and questionable values, like a world constitution and universal egalitarianism. The marxists only played a role in opening up societies(see Soros Open Society Foundation), opening the borders, making Illegals into legal citizens, shaping public opinion, saving "refugees", forcing people to tolerate each other, all so this mix up can happen. They've been a tool of the globalists, useful idiots, nothing more. Divide an conquer. If globalists are unable to integrate the US, land of freedom, into their plans for the planet, well... flood them with immigrants who will vote against the natives interests.
Whatever the case. How to prepare to face the future:
Whatever it will be we will be looking at more of a civil war/conflict type of scenario. At least the clash of civilizations. The most dominant group will win. And this will be the group with the greatest spiritual and cultural strength aswell as man power.
So I say it woud be benefitial to actually plan for a multi generational conflict. This is going to take a loooong time. The reconquista took about 400 years, so... start fucking people.
1. Move to the countysite and build (energy/food and control) independent traditionalists communities.
2. Have as many children as possible.
3. Form many secret brotherhoods fighting for white interests all over the western world that are able to collaborate.
4. Infiltrate politics on all levels.
5. Slowly reconquer the cities.
6. Move into the media on all levels. Shape public opinion.
7. In the cities, build white fraternities where the white students can study together for their common goals.
8. Perform soft Eugenics, for example selective breeding to increase IQ and bodily health. In civilization we must take the place of nature otherwise we will all be living as cripples, riddled with diseases in the future.
9. Form a new kind of spiritual world view, morality and traditions, sth. that is timeless and binds all together.
All in mine craft of course.

shakethenuttree, r/ChadRight 3 Comments [9/10/2018 7:51:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: hydrolythe
1 2 3 4 | top